throbber
INTERNATIONAL
`
`STANDARD
`
`ISO
`
`9241-14
`
`First edition
`1997-06-01
`
`
`
`Ergonomic requirements for office work
`with visual display terminals (VDTs) —
`
`Part 14:
`
`Menu dialogues
`
`EX/gences ergonomiques pour travail de bureau avec terminaux a écrans
`de visualisation (TE V) ——
`
`Partie 14: Dialogues de type menu
`
`
`SONY Exhibit 1023
`SONY v. Creative
`IPR2016-01407
`IPR2016-01407
`Reference number
`‘50 924144319975)
`
`SNY Exhibit 1023 SONY V. Creative
`
`
`Licensed to Wunney Walsh (cwalsh@wolfgreenfield,com)
`ISO SloTeOr—G‘WOS756 / Downloaded: 2017-03—29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`Contents
`
`Page
`
`1
`
`Scope —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— --
`
`1
`
`2 Normative reference ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— -— 2
`
`3
`
`Definitions —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 2
`
`4 Application oflSO 9241—14 ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 5
`
`4.l Appropriateness of menu dialogues ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- 5
`
`4.2 Applying the recommendations ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————w— 6
`
`4.3 Evaluation of products ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 6
`
`5 Menu structure ——————————————————————
`
`———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-- 6
`
`5.1 Structuring into levels and menus (overall structure) ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 6
`
`5.2 Grouping options within a menu ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- 7
`
`5.3 Sennencni” of options within groups ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————- 8
`
`6 Menu navigation ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 9
`
`6.1 Navigational cues AAAAAAAAAAA 7»
`
`~ ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-— 9
`
`6.2 Rapid navigation ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——lO
`
`7
`
`Option selection and execution ——————————.————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——l
`
`7:1 Selection methods ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------—l
`
`1
`
`l
`
`7.2 Alphanumeric keyboard ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————~-l3
`
`7.3 Function neys ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————l5
`
`7.4 Cursor key selection ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--l 5
`
`7.5 Pointing ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— «‘16
`
`© $01997
`
`All rights reserved. Unless othenivrse specified, no part oi this publication may be reproduofi or
`utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
`including photocopying and
`microfilm, without permission in writing from the publisher.
`International Organization for Standardization
`Case postale 56 - (EH-1.211. Geneve 2O - Switzerland
`lnternet
`central@iso.ch
`X.4OO
`c:ch; a=400net; p=iso; ozisocs; szcentral
`Printed in Switzerland
`
`innnnnrt {A mini; Crnnniiow I Pnrufinoi: ‘Aln'hk /~.mlg~l«mumizfiflvwetinw
`xvvrlvvv iv Hm. vnuvnnvvu l vvuiuiuy vvaioll \cwaionwwvn iccnnciu
`ISO Store Order: OP-205756 / Downloaded: 2017-83-29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`Abwu
`.uuru/
`
`

`

`© ISO
`
`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`7.6 Voice ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--17
`
`8 Menu presentation .................................................................................................._.1 8
`
`8.1 Option accessibility and discrimination __________________________________________________________________________1 3
`
`8.2 Placement —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————"20
`
`8.3 Text option structure and syntax ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------_-23
`
`84 Graphic option structure and syntax -------------------------------------------------------------------------------25
`
`8,5 Auditory option structure and syntax ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————--25
`
`Annex A (informative) Sample procedure for assessing applicability and adherence ——————————————————————"27
`
`Annex B (informative) Examples of applying ISO 9241-14 ...................................................._-46
`
`Annex C (informative) Bibliography ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------—_48
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (cwalsh@wolfgreenfield.com)
`ISO Store Order: OP-205756 / Downloaded: 201103-29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`in
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`Foreword
`
`© ISO
`
`is a worldwide federation of national
`ISO (the International Organization for Standardization)
`standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally
`carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a
`technical committee has been established has the right
`to be represented on that committee.
`International organizations, governmental and non~governmental, in liaison with lSO, also take part in
`the work.
`ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (lEC) on all
`matters of electrotechnical standardization.
`
`Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to member bodies for
`voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75% of the member
`bodies casting a vote.
`,w“ “.2 A...
`I““Ir-v
`Cl lldllUlld
`
`I
`l Standard ISO 9241-14 was prepared by the Technical Committee ISO/TCI59,
`w
`Ergonomics, Subcommittee 8C4 Ergonomics of human—system interaction.
`
`lSO 9241' consists of the following parts, under the general title Ergonomic requirements for office
`work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
`
`Part 1: General
`
`Part 2." Guidance on task requirements
`
`Part 3: Visual display requirements
`
`Part 4." Keyboard requirements
`
`Part 5.' Workstation layout and postural requirements
`
`Part 6: Environmental requirements
`
`Part 7: Requirements for display with reflection
`
`Part 8: Requirements for displayed colours
`
`Part 9: Requirements for nonkeyboard input devices
`
`Part 10: Dialogue principles
`
`Part I 1: Guidance on usability
`
`Part 12: Presentation of information
`
`Part 13: User guidance
`
`Part 14: Menu dialogues
`
`Part 1' 5 : Command dialogues
`
`Part 16: Direct manipulation dialogues
`
`Part 1 7: Farm-filling dialogues
`
`Annexes A to C ofthis part of ISO 9241 are for information only.
`
`_
`IV
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (Gwalsh@v"“‘gro afieldcom)
`ISO Store Order: OP~205756 / Downloaded: 2017- 3-29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`

`

`© lSO
`
`Introduction
`
`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`International Standard ISO 9241 deals with several aspects of the use of VDTs. Currently,
`individual parts can be grouped in the following categories:
`
`the
`
`ISO 9241—1: Introduction
`
`ISO 9241—2: Guidance on task requirements
`
`ISO 9241—5 and —6: Workstation and environment
`
`ISO 924l—3,-4,— 7,- 8 and -9: Ergonomics pertaining to hardware
`
`ISO 9241—10 through -I7: Ergonomics pertaining to software interfaces
`
`ISO 9241—14 is concerned with the ergonomic design of menu dialogues. In menu dialogues, the
`dialogue system presents one or more groups of options to the user, the user chooses one or more
`options, and the computer executes the desired process denoted by the option(s).
`
`ISO 9241-14 serves the following types of user:
`
`0
`
`0
`
`-
`
`the user interface designer, who will apply ISO 9241-14 during the development process;
`
`the buyer, who will reference ISO 9241—14 during the product procurement process;
`
`evaluators responsible for ensuring products meet the recommendations in ISO 9241-14,
`
`0 designers of user interface development tools to be used by interface designers;
`
`-
`
`end users who will gain from the potential benefits provided by the standard.
`
`ISO 9241-14 consists of a number of recommendations, some of which are conditional, concerning
`menus. Conditional
`recommendations are recommendations that should be met only within the
`specific context for which they are relevant (e.g., particular kinds of users,
`tasks, environments,
`technology). These recommendations were developed primarily by reviewing the existing relevant
`literature and empirical evidence, then generalizing and formulating this work into recommendations.
`The source ofthe evidence for the individual recommendations can be found in annex C.
`
`Differences in the relative importance of the task, user, environment, and technology in the design
`process are inevitable and have led to the "if —
`then" structure of many of the conditional
`recommendations. For example, "If rapid search time is important, then place as many options and
`levels as possible on a single menu panel." This method provides practical, usable and unambiguous
`guidance during user interface design.
`
`Designers and evaluators using ISO 9241-14 need to know that they are developing an interface that
`will meet the recommendations provided in this part. Likewise, the buyer needs a means to determine
`how a product matches the recommendations in ISO 9241—14. The elements can be tailored due to the
`"if — then" structure in ISO 9241-14. Additionally,
`it
`is not the intent of ISO 9241—14 that every
`recommendation should be applied, only those that are relevant.
`
`The application of ISO 9241—14 is expected to improve the overall quality of the menus, but this
`standard (like any other standard) will not guarantee the quality of the interface. Quality depends on
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (cwalsh@wolfgreenfield.com)
`ISO Store Order: OP—205756 l Downloaded: 2017-03—29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`© ISO
`
`Specific usability criteria as set by the user, buyer or other menu dialogue consumer which may
`include specifications based on this standard,
`
`that lSO 9241—20 describes dialogue principles that are relevant {or the design of
`It should be note
`menu dialogues. These principles should provide the designer and evaluator with additional
`Inform an
`.4 A
`A
`A
`H
`i
`on concerning the ergonomic rationale for the various recommendations in ISO 92 1—14 and,
`therefore, assist
`in making tradeoffs. However,
`it may be necessary to base tradeoffs on other
`r\r\
`(“Any hn n no
`n
`\«Uuoruwlauuna GD WU
`
`,
`Vl
`
`I :N‘nfifia “a \AIAl‘ fwfifinzau I FAUARN, \Aln|..l.. 1A.“..Ihkmwmirhwhnvz;
`LNG: iqcu LU vvun uizci Incuu l your u my VVGIDII \bvvaloll wvvungnccnu
`|SO Store Order: OP—205756 / Downloaded: 2017-03-29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL STANDARD © ISO ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display
`terminals (VDTs) ——
`
`Part 14:
`
`Menu dialogues
`
`1 Scope
`
`This part of ISO 9241 provides conditional recommendations for menus used in user—computer
`dialogues to accomplish typical office tasks. The recommendations cover menus presented by various
`techniques including windowing, panels, buttons, fields, etc. These recommendations can be utilized
`throughout the design process (e.g., as guidance for designers during design, as a basis for heuristic
`evaluation, as guidance for usability testing).
`
`Interface design depends upon the task, the user, the environment, and the available technology.
`Consequently, ISO 9241-14 cannot be applied without a knowledge of the design and use context of
`the interface and it
`is not intended to be used as a prescriptive set of rules to be applied in their
`entirety. Rather,
`it assumes that the designer has proper information available concerning task and
`user requirements and understands the use of available technology (this may require consultation with
`a qualified ergonomics professional as well as empirical testing with real users).
`
`Although this is an International Standard, some of the conditional recommendations are based on
`Latin‘based language usage and may not apply, or may need to be modified, for use with a different
`language. For example, in right—to—left languages those conditional recommendations oriented towards
`Ieft-to-right
`reading may need to be modified and adapted.
`In applying those conditional
`recommendations that assume a specific language base (e.g., alphabetic ordering of menu options,
`compound titles), care should be taken concerning the intent of the standard when translation is
`required to a different language.
`
`The recommendations relate to the three major design components of user interfaces, i.e., dialogue,
`input, and output.
`
`Dialogue design determines the way in which a user is guided by the system to make inputs and
`influences the amount of control the user has over the dialogue. The dialogue should be designed to
`support the user in his/her actual work without the user being bothered by additional work caused by
`system peculiarities. Menu dialogue design is covered in this part of ISO 9241 in terms of designing
`the menu structure, providing facilities for menu navigation and defining the selection methods for
`menu options.
`
`information into the system using various input
`Input design is concerned with how users input
`devices. Menu options can be selected by means of one or more input devices such as an
`alphanumeric keyboard, function keys, cursor keys, pointing devices and voice (other devices are not
`excluded) depending on the task at hand and dialogue requirements, as well as on individual
`preferences. ISO 9241-14 provides conditional recommendations for the use of each of the input
`devices listed above.
`
`Output design is concerned with how data should be presented consistently and perceptibly distinct on
`the display. ISO 924le4 provides conditional recommendations for the placement of options and
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (cwalsh@wo|fgreentieldcom)
`ISO Store Order: OP—205756 / Downloaded: 2017-0329
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`1
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`© lSO
`
`option groups, the structure and syntax for textual, graphic and auditory options and presentation
`techniques to indicate option accessibility and discrimination.
`
`Providing users with the capability to alter the interface to suit their own needs has become a popular
`approach to software interface design. This is often a desirable feature of the interface. However,
`providing users with customization capabilities is not an acceptable substitute for ergonomically
`designed initial menus (i.e., default menus).
`it should be noted that customization of the menus may
`result in deviations from ISO 924l-l4. Therefore, customization options also should be evaluated
`with resoect to the
`180 9241714.
`
`2 Normative reference
`
`The tollowmg standard contains provisions which, through reierence in this text, constitute provisions
`oft' is part oflSO 924i. At the time of publication, the edition indicated was valid. All standards are
`subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on this part of ISO 9241 are encouraged to
`investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the standard indicated below.
`Members oflEC and ISO maintain registers of currently valid International Standards.
`
`ISO 9241-8:—,1 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTS) —
`Part 8.“ Requirements for displayed colours.
`
`3 Definitions
`
`For the purposes ofthis part oflSO 924i, the following definitions apply.
`
`3.1 accelerator keys: Key combinations (sometimes called "shortcut keys") which invoke a menu
`option without displaying the menu on which the option appears or intermediate menus.
`
`3.2 cascading menu panels: Menu panels in a menu hierarchy displayed so that each submenu
`originates adjacent to the choice selected from the higher level menu (suggesting a "cascading"
`effect).
`
`3.3 critical option: Option with significant positive impact on system or task performance, or which
`can halt or reverse significant degradation to system or task performance (e.g. save the user or the
`system from disaster).
`
`3.4 destructive option: Option which can seriously degrade system or task performance, or destroy
`work or data (e.g. deleting a file).
`
`3.5
`
`hierarchical menus: Series of menus which are structured in a hierarchical or "tree—like"
`
`manner, where the selection of an initial option leads to another menu containing additional options,
`which may lead to another menu, etc, until the desired results are obtained.
`
`3.6 level: Nesting order within a menu hierarchy. The first choice level (initial, or main menu) in the
`hierarchy would be level 1, the next choice level (obtained by a selection ofa level i option) would be
`level '2, etc.
`n 4..
`A.
`A”
`a o . n . ‘ rr‘
`y‘
`“
`,nm AA
`m4
`: Uh» “sun. 1
`lUl a 1 LAal 11.1 u U] a LW
`NO] h l
`C
`F
`I
`l
`l
`‘ r
`C
`
`‘ La "ANA W,....,A.t4.|
`rim: same menu panel.
`
`,
`
`.
`.,
`Aral—“y Air
`IL;
`I
`I
`G-iC‘v’E IIiCi'an. 1y unapli‘lyCCi Oi
`
`if several groups of options are presented on a menu panel, but a selection from any of these groups
`NOTE 2
`would lead to a lower level menu, these groups would be considered as at the same level.
`
`
`
`‘ To be published.
`
`h)
`
`l r‘AIIr‘w‘fi" A,r1.r1L- IA..ianl~/2\.HAI(~—AAA
`(«An inl
`r“ AI
`innnnn
`LWWG to not amused, WWW, iiw. (“menwmwwcn
`|SO Store Order: OP-205756 / Downloaded: 2017-03—29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`n.
`
`{Alit:
`
`

`

`© ISO
`
`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`3.7 level of experience: The relative amount of experience of (different) user segments of the user
`population.
`
`NOTE: The experience level of the user on computer systems as well as the experience level with the task
`domain are important considerations when deciding upon appropriate menu dialogue techniques.
`
`3.8 list: Horizontal or vertical presentation of "data" items in a display which usually changes
`according to the states of the application.
`
`NOTE: Although in some cases items can be selected from a list, only where items in the list are arranged or
`structured to optimize item choice such lists are considered menus. Additionally, those lists of items which
`exceed the display area (often called "scrollable menus") should be considered lists and not menus. (Lists are
`covered in ISO 9241—12.)
`
`3.9 menu: Set of selectable options.
`
`NOTE: Menu options may be presented to the user by means of visual display devices (textually or
`symbolically), or audibly. A menu may contain multiple option groups, but unless only one choice is allowed
`u'
`across groups, each group would be considered a menu. Highlighted words, symbols, or other material in texts
`(sometimes called
`implicit" or "embedded" menus) are not considered menus within the context of
`ISO 9241—14.
`
`3.10 menu access: Method by which the user obtains the menu.
`
`NOTE: Typical means for accessing menus include:
`
`-
`
`keying in keywords or command words or their abbreviations (e.g., command-line input);
`
`-- pressing an appropriate key or button (e.g. function key, mouse button);
`
`0
`
`-
`
`locating and selecting a specific position or object on the screen with a pointing device (or directly with the
`finger);
`
`vocal request.
`
`3.11 menu bar: Horizontal set of options, usually located at the top ofa work area or window, which
`invoke lower—level pull—down menus or initiate specific actions.
`
`3.12 menu map: Graphical representation ofa menu structure.
`
`3.13 menu option: Selectable choice presented (textually, symbolically, or auditory) within a menu
`paneL
`
`3.14 menu panel: Portion of the menu structure presented to the user at a given point in time
`
`NOTE 1: Menu panel also pertains to the portion of an auditory menu (sequence of options) presented to a user
`in a time segment.
`
`ln figure 2,
`In figure l. two complete levels of the menu structure are displayed on a menu panel.
`NOTE 2:
`although the full top level ofthe same structure is displayed. only the lower level ofCategory B is displayed.
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (cwalsh@wolfgreenfieldcom)
`ISO Store Order: OP~205756 / Downloaded: 2017'03—29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`3
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`© ISO
`
` Menu Title
`Category A
`Category B
`Category C
`i
`Al Option
`Bl Option
`Cl Option
`l
`5
`A2 Option
`B2 Option
`C2 Option
`5
`l
`A3 Option
`B3 Option
`C3 Option
`|
`i
`“t ny.
`4 l"\.. A“
`I \
`l
`
`
`
`!
`
`
`B1 Option
`
`Category C
`
`l
`
`
`
`
`
`
`84 Option
`
`
`Figure 2 — A pull-down menu panel with the "Category B” option selected and displayed
`
`3.15 menu structure: Relationships among a set of menus.
`
`EXAMPLE: Hierarchical tree structure‘or network structure.
`
`3.16 multiple selection: Selection of more than one option at a time from a menu before execution.
`
`3.17 navigation: Orientation within a met
`f
`menu panel an movemen
`
`3
`u structure, movement from option to option within a
`” Su' r‘Onv-a
`fr-
`. v
`\«l I
`C
`n.
`anel within a me
`
`3.18 network menus: Series of menus structured as a network (consisting ofa set of nodes and
`of links connecting the related nodes) providing redundant pathways to either all or some 0
`menus within the structure.
`
`EXAMPLE: in a financial informationsystem, consumer spending option categories that can be accessed both
`the financial and the consumer higher-level menus.
`
`3.19 option designator: Code, abbreviation, or a portion of the option name used to designate
`uniquely each option on a menu.
`
`NOTE: An option designator may be explicit or implicit.
`
`An explicit designator is an option code or abbreviation, set apart (usually to the left) from the option name,
`typed in for selection.
`
`EXAMPLE: P Print
`
`An implicit designator is the portion of an option name which can be used for keyboard selection (egr. indicated
`by highlighting this portion),
`
`EXAMPLE: print
`
`4
`
`the n
`thiihwxbnfi
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield .’ Courtney Walsh (cwam. .Qv-w..3.ec..
`lSO Store Order: OP—205756 / Downloaded: 2017-03—29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`

`

`© lSO
`
`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`3.20 option execution: Action used to execute the selected option(s) (i.e., the requested function is
`performed).
`
`NOTE: Option selection and execution may be performed by the same user act (e.g., key press). (Also see
`"option selection", below.)
`
`3.21 option group: Group of options within a menu.
`
`NOTE: Menus and menu panels may contain more than one option group.
`
`3.22 option label: Name displayed in a menu to identify a specific menu option.
`
`3.23 option selection: Action by which the user indicates his/her choice of one or more options from
`the menu. (Also see "option execution" above.)
`
`3.24 pop«up menu: Menu displayed ("popped-up") at a specific location on the screen (e.g., near an
`object or next to a pointer) when a particular condition occurs, a button is engaged, or a command is
`executed.
`
`3.25 pull-down menu: Menu displayed ("pulled‘down") by selecting an option from a horizontal
`menu (typically from a menu bar) at the top of the screen or window.
`
`NOTE: Pull-down menus can have multiple levels.
`
`3.26 screen button: Labelled screen graphic, intended to represent control buttons, typically selected
`by means ofa pointing device or cursor keys, and executed by a pointing device button or the "Enter"
`key.
`
`NOTE: Screen buttons may represent menu options or commands.
`
`4 Application of ISO 9241—14
`
`4.1 Appropriateness of menu dialogues
`
`Menu dialogues are especially appropriate for one or more of the following conditions, which have
`been grouped to reflect user, task and system issues. The applicability of menus becomes greater as
`more conditions are met.
`
`a) User and organizational characteristics
`
`1. Training needs to be minimized.
`2. Users have little or no typing skills.
`3. Users have little or no experience with the application.
`
`b) Task characteristics
`
`1. Use of the system application is infrequent and the user typically needs guidance as to available
`options,
`
`2. A limited number of choices are relevant for accomplishing the task within a specific context.
`(Some task sequences may, however, be such that a menu dialogue is not appropriate.)
`
`3. The primary task requires the use of non«keyboard pointing devices.
`
`4. Default or current options must be displayed to perform the task effectively.
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (cwalsh@wolfgreenfield.com)
`lSO Store Order: OP—205756 / Downloaded: 2017-03-29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`5
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`© ISO
`
`5. The command set is too large to commit all commands to memory in the overall application.
`
`c) System capabilities
`
`l. The system has a limited keyboard,
`
`I\)
`
`4«~.
`S stem res onse time to acknowledge the activation of the menu choicei’s‘i is annro riate for the.
`P
`_
`t
`I
`.
`.
`task (eg. within 2 s).
`
`4.2 Applying the recommendations
`
`General ergonomic design objectives are provided in each of clauses 5 through 8. The individual
`
`
`i at ajhieving
`r
`"
`'
`objectives should be applied within the specific context
`for which they are relevant (e.g., particular kinds of users, tasks, environments, tecmology). The
`format
`for
`the individual
`recommendations is: statement of the recommendation, example (if
`appropriate), and notes (if appropriate). In addition, those clauses in clause 7 (Option selection and
`execution) that provide recommendations concerning a particular selection method also contain notes
`at
`the beginning of the subclause pertaining to the appropriateness of that particular method.
`Examples provided for the various recommendations generally depict an implementation that
`embodies the recommendation. Some examples also indicate preferred solutions.
`
`if judged to be
`their applicability and,
`recommendations should be evaluated for
`lndividnal
`applicable, should be implemented in the relevant menu dialogue unless there is evidence that to do so
`would cause deviation from the design objectives or would result
`in an overall degradation in
`usability. When determining applicability, the recommendations generally should be evaluated in the
`order presented in the relevant clause or subclause. ln judging whether applicable recommendations
`have been met, evaluators should evaluate the product or observe representative users of the product
`in the context of accomplishing the user's tasks via the menu system. Sample procedures which
`support the determination of applicability and for determining whether a recommendation has been
`followed are provided in annex A.
`
`4.3 Evaluation of products
`
`If a product is claimed to have met the applicable recommendations in this part of ISO 9241, the
`procedure used in establishing requirements for, developing, and/or evaluating the menus shall be
`specified. The level of specification of the procedure is a matter of negotiation between the involved
`parties.
`
`Users of this part of ISO 924] can either utilize the procedures provided in annex A, or develop
`another procedure tailored to their particular development and/or evaluation environment.
`
`5 Menu structure
`
`Usually the number of options is too large to present them efficiently in a single menu panel.
`Therefore it
`is often necessary to design a menu structure (hierarchical, network, or other logical
`p
`structure) and to place options into groups. it should be noted that while option categorization may
`or
`A AnlAnmo aA «LA "Na"
`U1
`sunny uLngu Ml LU [MC UbCl .
`lbu u. uni nqu n
`c.
`appear logical to the designer, that
`atem‘rI'7a.‘t'rm me" not new 0
`-'" b
`
`5.1 Structuring into levels and menus (overall structure)
`
`Subclause 5.] covers overall structure, 5.2 pertains to the grouping of options and their presentation in
`menu panels, and 5.3 concerns the sequencing of options within a group.
`
`CD
`
`"iprr‘n W“vA|f<¢flAv\‘:r‘le ~~M\
`an
`u
`n
`'
`I
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield .’ Courtnc Walsh (evvalshQVVUJWW.nmmcum,
`ISO Store Order: OP—20575é / Downloaded: 2017-03—29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`

`

`© ISO
`
`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`Menu structures should reflect user expectations and facilitate the user's ability to find and to select
`menu options relevant for the task and should support the user's flow of work.
`
`5.1.1 Conventional categories
`
`If options can be arranged into conventional or natural groups known to users, options should be
`organized into levels and menus consistent with that order.
`
`NOTE: In an inventory system, office machines, furniture and expendables are the first level options and each of
`these are broken down into options representing the specific inventory item types.
`
`EXAMPLE: Office machines is broken down into computers, typewriters, printers, copiers.
`
`5.1.2 Logical categories
`
`If options have no conventional grouping or structure, but can be grouped or ordered in a manner
`which is unambiguous and easily learned by the user population, options should be organized to
`minimize the number of levels and maximize the number of options per menu.
`
`EXAMPLE: Placing "object" options in one group and "action" options in another is an example of structuring
`into logical categories based on functional relationships.
`
`NOTE: The number of options placed in a given menu depends both on the display space available and the
`discriminability of the individual options.
`
`5.1.3 Arbitrary grouping
`
`lf options cannot be grouped into categories which are unambiguous or apparent to users (typically,
`because users are unsure of how the desired option will be described), options should be arranged
`consistently (e.g., alphabetically, numerically) into groups of four to eight options per level. Breaking
`options into small groups may facilitate search strategies when option comparisons take time (e.g.
`when options are lengthy or the user is unsure of how the desired option will be described).
`
`EXAMPLE: An infomiation system (e.g., a text-TV information retrieval system) where users are not sure of
`how information ofinterest will be described.
`
`NOTE: Although many levels can result using the above approach in some cases, the effect of such depth is less
`important in arbitrary grouped options than in logically grouped options.
`
`5.1.4 Search time considerations
`
`lf rapid search time is important, as many Options and levels as possible should be placed on a single
`visually displayed menu panel. Individual options and option groups should be visually distinct. (Also
`see 8.2.)
`
`NOTE: Since scrollable lists (sometimes called "scrollable menus") would increase search time, consider not
`using them where rapid search time is important.
`
`5.2 Grouping options within a menu
`
`Menu options should be grouped within a menu to reflect user expectations and facilitate option
`search.
`
`Licensed to Wolf Greenfield / Courtney Walsh (cwalsh@wolfgreenfield.com)
`ISO Store Order: OP—205756 / Downloaded: 2017«O3-29
`Single user licence only, copying and networking prohibited.
`
`7
`
`

`

`ISO 9241-14:1997(E)
`
`5.2.1 Logical groups
`
`© ISO
`
`If the menu contains a large number of options (eight or more) and these options can be logically
`grouped, options should be grouped by function or into other logical categories which are meaningful
`to users.
`
`EXAMPLE: Grouping the commands in a word processing system into such categories as customize, compose,
`edit, print.
`
`(JR
`
`.2] Arbitrar" groups
`
`If 8 or more options are arranged arbitrarily in a menu panel, they should be arranged into equally
`distributed groups utilizing the following equation:
`
`8'
`
`: 1viii
`
`where
`
`g is the number of groups,
`n is the number of options on the panel.
`
`EXAMPLE: Given 19 options in a menu panel, arrange them in four groups of about five options each.
`
`5.3 Sequencing of options within groups
`
`Options should be sequenced within an option group to facilitate option search and task performance.
`
`it may be necessary to compare the relative appropriateness of the
`NOTE: Except for consistency (5.3.1),
`sequencing approaches (ie. perform "tradeoffs") for the users and tasks for which the menu system is intended.
`
`5.3.1 Consistency
`
`Options should be placed consistently in the same relative order within the option group. (Also see
`5.2.1.)
`
`EXAMPLE: Options in a menu panel are ordered "file, edit, insert, print" a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket