`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
` SULLIVAN, LLP
`John M. Neukom (SBN 275887)
`Email: johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com
`Andrew M. Holmes (SBN 260475)
`Email: drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com
`Ognjen Zivojnovic (SBN 307801)
`Email: ogizivojnovic@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 875-6600
`Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Fortinet, Inc.
`
`Richard L. Seabolt (SBN 67469)
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`One Market Plaza, Suite 2200
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.957.3212
`Facsimile: 415.354.3317
`
`L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Matthew S. Yungwirth (admitted pro hac vice)
`S. Neil Anderson (admitted pro hac vice)
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`1075 Peachtree Street, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`Richard C. Kim
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`750 B Street
`Suite 2900
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619-744-2200
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`Ruckus Wireless, Inc. and NETGEAR, Inc.
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Jonathan S. Kagan (166039)
` (jkagan@irell.com)
`Talin Gordnia (274213)
` (tgordnia@irell.com)
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CHRIMAR SYSTEMS INC., et al. ,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Case No. 3:16-cv-00186-SI
`
`(Concurrently Filed in Case No. 3:16-cv-
`00624-SI; 3:16-cv-00558-SI; 3:16-cv-00897-
`SI)
`
`DEFENDANTS’ PRELIMINARY CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTIONS AND PRELIMINARY
`IDENTIFICATION OF EXTRINSIC
`EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`(Case No. 3:16-cv-00186-SI)
`
`
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-1
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`NETGEAR, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`FORTINET, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`1. PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND IDENTIFICATION OF
`INTRINSIC SUPPORT
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-2, Defendants Ruckus Wireless, Inc., NETGEAR, Inc.,
`
`Juniper Networks, Inc., and Fortinet, Inc. (collectively, the “Defendants”), hereby provide their
`
`preliminary claim constructions with respect to the asserted claims 31, 35, 36, 40, 43, 52, 56, 59,
`
`60, and 65 of U.S. Patent No. 8,155,012 (the “‘012 Patent”); claims 1, 31, 37, 59, 69, 72, 73, 106,
`
`112, 134, 142, and 145 of U.S. Patent No. 8,902,760 (the “‘760 Patent”); claims 1, 5, 31, 43, 70,
`
`72, 75, 83, 103, 104, 111, 123, and 125 of U.S. Patent No. 8,942,107 (the “‘107 Patent”); and 1, 2,
`
`7, 26, 29, 38, 40, 47, 55, and 69 of U.S. Patent No. 9,019,838 (the “‘838 Patent”) (collectively, the
`
`“Asserted Claims”) and intrinsic support for those constructions.
`
`Defendants’ proposed terms and claim elements for construction are limited to the patent
`
`claims identified in Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar
`
`Holding Company, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) Patent Local Rule 3-1 and 3-2 Disclosures. Defendants’
`
`proposed constructions are based upon information currently available to Defendants. One or
`
`more of these claim terms and phrases are indefinite and otherwise improper under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 112(2), and Defendants reserve all rights to assert those defects as to each such claim term or
`
`phrase. Additionally, as discovery progresses, Plaintiffs produce documents that have or will be
`
`requested, and additional information becomes available, Defendants reserve the right to amend
`
`their proposed constructions following their meet and confer with Plaintiffs in preparation for
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`(Case No. 3:16-cv-00186-SI)
`
`
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-2
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`filing a Joint Claim Construction Statement, pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-3. Defendants
`
`reserve the right to supplement, revise, modify, or otherwise finalize the proposed constructions,
`
`positions, and/or information in this disclosure to take into account additional information that
`
`comes to light, including without limitation as additional contentions are made, facts are
`
`ascertained, analyses are made, and proposed constructions are provided by Plaintiffs.
`
`Subject to the above limitations and reservations of rights, Defendants submit the
`
`following proposed constructions as set forth in Attachment A for the Asserted Claims.
`
`As for the remaining terms and phrases identified by Defendants in their Patent Local Rule
`
`4-1 Disclosures, Defendants agree with Plaintiff that those terms and phrases do not require the
`
`Court’s construction at this time.
`2. PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-2 and the Court’s Civil Minutes Order, Dkt. No. 68,
`
`Defendants provide below a preliminary identification of extrinsic support for their claim
`
`construction positions, including with respect to confirming the plain and ordinary meaning of the
`
`terms identified in their Patent Local Rule 4-1 disclosures (to the extent that Plaintiffs construes
`
`those terms contrary to their plain and ordinary meaning as would be understood by one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art): CMS-4-2_00000001 - CMS-4-2_00008343. Defendants also expressly
`
`reserve the right to rely on any extrinsic evidence that Plaintiffs rely upon and/or to supplement
`
`this disclosure if Plaintiffs propose a construction or applies a different meaning of the terms than
`
`the plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Defendants may also rely upon the testimony, statements, and/or deposition exhibits of the
`listed inventors and/or prosecuting attorneys of the Patents-in-Suit1 for claim construction
`purposes. In summary, such testimony could include an explanation of the meaning of the claim
`
`terms in the context of the subject matter of the Patents-in-Suit, a description of the state of the
`
`technology relating to the claimed invention at the time the applications for the Patents-in-Suit
`
`were filed, a description of the qualifications of a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the
`
`
`1 The “Patents-in-Suit” refers to the ‘012 Patent, ‘760 Patent, ‘107 Patent, and ‘838 Patent.
`- 3 -
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`(Case No. 3:16-cv-00186-SI)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-3
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`applications for the Patents-in-Suit were filed, and how a person of ordinary skill in the art would
`
`interpret the identified claim terms or phrases at the time the applications for the ‘Patents-in-Suit
`
`were filed. Defendants may supplement their claim constructions following the completion of the
`
`depositions of the above-listed individuals or entities.
`
`Defendants may also rely upon the testimony and/or statements of their expert, Mr. Ian
`
`Crayford, regarding the proposed constructions, including the indefiniteness of any claims. Mr.
`
`Crayford’s resume is attached hereto as Attachment B. In summary, such testimony could include
`
`an explanation of the meaning of the claim terms in the context of the subject matter of the
`
`Patents-in-Suit, a description of the state of the technology relating to the claimed inventions at the
`
`time the applications for the Patents-in-Suit were filed, a description of the qualifications of a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the applications for the Patents-in-Suit were filed, and
`
`how a person of ordinary skill in the art would interpret the identified claim terms or phrases at the
`
`time the applications for the Patents-in-Suit were filed. Such testimony could also include an
`
`opinion that a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the applications for the Patents-in-Suit
`
`were filed would construe the claim terms as Defendants have proposed. Defendants also
`
`expressly reserve the right to rely on additional expert opinions in rebuttal of any opinions
`
`submitted by Plaintiffs.
`
`Finally, Defendants may rely upon declarations of other prior artists identified in
`
`Defendants’ Patent Local Rule 3-3 disclosures. Such declarations relate to the understanding of
`
`those of ordinary skill in the art regarding the plain and ordinary meaning of the disputed terms in
`
`the context of the subject matter of the Patents-in-Suit and a description of the state of the
`
`technology relating to the claimed invention at the time the applications for the Patents-in-Suit
`
`were filed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`(Case No. 3:16-cv-00186-SI)
`
`
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-4
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`Dated: August 19, 2016
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth
`Richard L. Seabolt (SBN 67469)
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`One Market Plaza, Suite 2200
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.957.3212
`Facsimile: 415.354.3317
`
`L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Matthew S. Yungwirth (admitted pro hac vice)
`S. Neil Anderson (admitted pro hac vice)
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`1075 Peachtree Street, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`Richard C. Kim
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`750 B Street
`Suite 2900
`San Diego, CA 92101
`Telephone: 619-744-2200
`
`E-Mail: rlseabolt@duanemorris.com
`E-Mail: wjameson@duanemorris.com
`E-Mail: msyungwirth@duanemorris.com
`E-Mail: rckim@duanemorris.com
`E-Mail: snanderson@duanemorris.com
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`Ruckus Wireless, Inc. and NETGEAR, Inc.
`
`
`/s/ Ognjen Zivojnovic
` Ognjen Zivojnovic
`John M. Neukom (SBN 275887)
`Email: johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com
`Andrew M. Holmes (SBN 260475)
`Email: drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com
`Ognjen Zivojnovic (SBN 307801)
`Email: ogizivojnovic@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
` SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Telephone: (415) 875-6600
`Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Fortinet, Inc.
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`By: /s/ Talin Gordnia
` Talin Gordnia
`
`Jonathan S. Kagan (166039)
` (jkagan@irell.com)
`Talin Gordnia (274213)
` (tgordnia@irell.com)
`Andrew E. Krause (294850
` (akrause@irell.com)
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`Facsimile: (310) 203-7199
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Juniper Networks, Inc.
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURES
`(Case No. 3:16-cv-00186-SI)
`
`
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-5
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`ATTACHMENT A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-6
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`“An adapted piece of Ethernet
`data terminal equipment”
`(’012 patent, claims 31)
`
`1.
`
`Attachment A
`
`Proposed Construction
`The preamble is limiting and
`“adapted” should be construed to
`mean “modified (through a retrofit
`or a design change)”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`Intrinsic Support:1
`'012 Patent: Title; Figures 1-8 & 10- 22; 3:18- 37;
`4:40- 67; 5:33-61; 6:1- 30; 6:48- 67; 7:17- 21 , 35-
`65; 8:11- 18, 49- 55; 9:1-60; 10:31- 51; 11 :20-61;
`& 16:57- 64; Claims 1, 24, 31, 67, 98, 108 & 139
`'012 Prosecution History:
`February 6, 2012 Corrected Notice of Allowance
`at 2;
`February 2, 2012 Notice of Allowance at 2;
`December 6, 2011 Amendment and Petition for
`Extension of Time at 2, 6-7,11, 13, 18-19, 23, 25-
`30;
`March 25, 2011 Response to Restriction
`Requirement at 3, 8, 9, 14, & 16;
`October 29, 2009 Fifth Preliminary Amendment at
`26 & 39;
`June 9, 2009 Fourth Preliminary Amendment at 2-
`6;
`April 30, 2009 Third Preliminary Amendment at 6,
`11, 14, 18, 22, 25-26, & 30;
`April 3, 2009 Response to Notice of Non-
`Compliant Amendment at 5, 11, 15, 19, 23, 26, 28
`& 30;
`Second Preliminary Amendment at 7, 13, 16, 21,
`26, 29, 30;
`
`
`1 Because there is a common specification amongst the four Asserted Patents, citations to the specification are made only to the ‘012
`Patent.
`
`- 1 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-7
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`PCT/US98/11622 at Abstract, 1, 5-12, 16-20, 24-
`26;
`JPH8-307476 at Abstract, 2- 6;
`PCT/IB96/00223;
`September 26, 2008 Application at Abstract, 5- 9,
`11-20, 22, 24-26, & 36.
`U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250: Claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 10,
`16, 21, 23, 24, 53, 54, 57, 59, 60, 89, 90, 93, 95, &
`96.
`'250 Prosecution History:
`September 23, 2003 Application at Abstract, 5-25,
`34-37 & Figure 4;
`August 6, 2007 Office Action at 3;
`February 5, 2008 Amendment at 2-3, 6-8, & 9-11;
`May 13, 2008 Notice of Allowance at 2-5, & 7;
`August 1, 2008 Amendment Accompanying RCE
`at 3, 8, 12-13, 18-19, 25;
`June 9, 2009 Request for Certificate of Correction.
`U.S. Patent No. 6,650,622: Claims 1, 3-4, 6, 11-
`14, 16, & 18-20.
`‘622 Prosecution History:
`August 9, 1999 Application at 5-17, 19-23, 31-40,
`42, 50;
`August 23, 2000 Response to Restriction
`Requirement and Preliminary Amendment at 2-4;
`December 20, 2000 Office Action at 4-5;
`March 20, 2001 Amendment at 13-15, 17-22;
`
`- 2 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-8
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`2.
`
`“Ethernet data terminal
`equipment”
`(’012 patent, claims 31, 35, 36, 40,
`43, 52, 59, 60, 65)
`“Ethernet terminal equipment”
`(‘107 patent, claims 1, 5, 31, 43, 70,
`75, 83, 103)
`
`plain and ordinary meaning, which
`is “device at which data
`transmission originates or
`terminates and that is capable of
`Ethernet communication, as
`distinguished from intermediate
`network elements”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`April 5, 2001 Substitute Amendment at 15-24;
`July 17, 2001 Office Action at 2-4;
`October 12, 2001 Amendment at 6;
`January 4, 2002 Office Action at 3-5;
`June 24, 2002 Office Action at 2-4;
`March 6, 2003 Office Action at 2-4;
`June 6, 2003 Amendment After Final at 2.
`
`Extrinsic Support:
`Webster's New World College Dictionary (3rd ed.
`1997) at 15.
`The Oxford English Reference Dictionary (2nd ed.
`1996) at 15.
`Random House Compact Unabridged Dictionary
`(Special 2nd e. 1996).
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`'012 Patent Title; Abstract; Figures 2-4, 7-8, 10,
`13, 18, 19; 3:18-37; 4:40-64; 5:1-12; 5:20-32;
`6:19-24; 6:59-67; 7:17-8:57; 10:65-11:25; 11:37-
`64; 12:13-17; 12:62-13:63; & 15:22-61; Claims 1-
`2, 6, 14, 16-20, 24, 27-28, 31-61, 64-68, 70-72, 91,
`98, 106, 108-148 (particularly, claims 1-2, 6, 14,
`16-17, 24, 31-32, 36, 44, 46-47, 67, 68, 98, 106,
`109, 139, & 147)
`'012 Prosecution History:
`August 20, 2013 Certificate of Correction;
`May 31 , 2013 Request for Certificate of
`Correction at 1- 3;
`
`- 3 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-9
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`February 6, 2012 Corrected Notice of Allowability
`at 2;
`February 2, 2012 Notice of Allowability at 2;
`March 25, 2011 Response to Restriction
`Requirement at 3- 15;
`PCT/US98/11622 at 2, Fig. 1;
`Japan Pub. No. 10-013576 (1/16/98) at 1;
`PCT/IB96/00223 at 3, 23;
`JP4180430 at Abstract;
`FR2682843 at 1;
`JP63018741 at 1.
`‘107 Prosecution History:
`JP1016053 at 1.
`‘107 Patent: Claims 1, 5, 31, 43, 70, 75, 83, 103
`U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250 at Claims 1, 16, 50, 86,
`97-99, 122, 126.
`'250 Prosecution History:
`September 23, 2003 Application at 35-39;
`February 5, 2008 Amendment at 2-8 & 10-11;
`May 13, 2008 Notice of Allowance at 2-8;
`August 1, 2008 Amendment Accompanying RCE
`at 2-3, 5, 8-14, 17-20, & 23-26;
`September 5, 2008 Notice of Allowance at 2.
`U.S. Patent No. 6,650,622 at Claims 1, 3, 10, 11-
`13, 15-16, & 18-20.
`'622 Prosecution History:
`
`- 4 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-10
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`August 9, 1999 Application at 32-50;
`May 23, 2000 Office Action at 2;
`Auust 23, 2000 Response to Restriction
`Requirement and Preliminary Amendment at 2-4;
`December 20, 2000 Office Action at 4-6;
`March 20, 2001 Amendment at 13-22;
`April 5, 2001 Substitute Amendment at 15-24;
`July 17, 2001 Office Action at 3-4, 6;
`October 17, 2001 Amendment at 4 & 6;
`January 4, 2002 Office Action at 3-5;
`June 24, 2002 Office Action at 2-3;
`October 23, 2002 Amendment at 9-11;
`March 6, 2003 Office Action at 2-4;
`June 6, 2003 Amendment After Final at 2, 12.
`US 9,049,019 Prosecution History:
`January 26, 2105 Amendment at 3-31.
`Extrinsic Support:
`McGraw-Hill Data Communications Dictionary
`(1993) at 24.
`IEEE Standard 802.3-1990 (e.g., at
`Chrimar_Defs0000626 – 627, 630).
`IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and
`Electronics terms, 6th ed. 1996 at 255-256.
`McGraw-Hill Electronics Dictionary at 110.
`
`3.
`
`“end-device”
`(’107 Patent, claims 104, 111, 123,
`125)
`
`plain and ordinary meaning, i.e.,
`“device at the end of the network”
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`'012 Patent: Title; Abstract; Figures 2-4, 7- 8, 10,
`
`- 5 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-11
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`13, 18, 19; 3:18-37; 4:40-64; 5:1-12; 5:20-32;
`6:19-24; 6:59-67; 7:17-8:57; 10:65-11:25; 11:37-
`64; 12:13-17; 12:62-13:63; & 15:22-61; and
`Claims: 1-2, 6, 14, 16-20, 24, 27-28, 31-61 , 64-
`68, 70-72, 91, 98, 106, 108-148 (particularly,
`claims 1-2, 6, 14, 16-17, 24, 31-32, 36, 44, 46-47,
`67, 68, 98, 106, 109, 139, & 147)
`'012 Prosecution History:
`August 20, 2013 Certificate of Correction;
`May 31 , 2013 Request for Certificate of
`Correction at 1-3;
`February 6, 2012 Corrected Notice of Allowability
`at 2;
`February 2, 2012 Notice of Allowability at 2;
`March 25, 2011 Response to Restriction
`Requirement at 3-15;
`PCT/US98/11622 at 2, Fig. 1;
`Japan Pub. No. 10-013576 (1/16/98) at 1;
`PCT/IB96/00223 at 3, 23;
`JP4180430 at Abstract;
`FR2682843 at 1;
`JP1016053 at 1;
`JP63018741 at 1.
`U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250: Claims 1, 16, 50, 86,
`97-99, 122, 126.
`'250 Prosecution History:
`September 23, 2003 Application at 35-39;
`February 5, 2008 Amendment at 2-8 & 10-11;
`
`- 6 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-12
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`May 13, 2008 Notice of Allowance at 2-8;
`August 1, 2008 Amendment Accompanying RCE
`at 2-3, 5, 8-14, 17-20, & 23-26;
`September 5, 2008 Notice of Allowance at 2.
`U.S. Patent No. 6,650,622: Claims 1, 3, 10, 11-13,
`15-16, & 18-20.
`'622 Prosecution History:
`August 9, 1999 Application at 32-50;
`May 23, 2000 Office Action at 2;
`August 23, 2000 Response to Restriction
`Requirement and Preliminary Amendment at 2-4;
`December 20, 2000 Office Action at 4-6;
`March 20, 2001 Amendment at 13-22;
`April 5, 2001 Substitute Amendment at 15-24;
`July 17, 2001 Office Action at 3-4, 6;
`October 17, 2001 Amendment at 4 & 6;
`January 4, 2002 Office Action at 3-5;
`June 24, 2002 Office Action at 2-3;
`October 23, 2002 Amendment at 9-11;
`March 6, 2003 Office Action at 2-4;
`June 6, 2003 Amendment After Final at 2, 12.
`US 9,049,019 Prosecution History:
`January 26, 2105 Amendment at 3-31.
`
`4.
`
`“distinguishing information about
`the piece of Ethernet data
`terminal equipment”
`(’012 patent, claims 31)
`
`“information to differentiate each
`piece of Ethernet data terminal
`equipment from each other piece
`of Ethernet data terminal
`- 7 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`'012 Patent: Figure 3; 1:23-26; 1:28-2:33; 2:56-57;
`3:10-14; 3:22-26; 4:24-31; 4:40-5:32; 5:53-65;
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-13
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`equipment”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`6:7-30; 6:35-36; 7:66-9:23; 10:27-30; 11:10-13;
`11:54-61; 12:48-13:63; 14:35-52; 15:33-42; 16:1-
`4; 16:44-46; & 16:57-64; and Claims 1, 3, 15, 18-
`20, 31 , 33, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 108, & 110-113
`'012 Prosecution History:
`May 31 , 2013 Request for Certificate of
`Correction at 1- 3;
`February 6, 2012 Corrected Notice of Allowance
`at 2-7;
`February 2, 2012 Notice of Allowance at 2-6;
`December 6, 2011 Am. & Pet. For Ext. of Time at
`7 & 12-25;
`June 9, 2011 Office Action at 2- 3; &
`March 25, 2011 Response to Restriction
`Requirement at 1, & 3-15.
`May 4, 2009 Third Preliminary Amendment at 7,
`13, 17, 21, & 25.
`April 3, 2009 Response to Notice of Non-
`Compliant Amendment at 7, 13, 17, 21, & 25.
`September 26, 2008 Application at 37, 39-41, &
`43.
`'250 Patent Claims: 33, 69, 74, 105, & 110
`'250 Prosecution History:
`EP0639916A2 at 5:28-32; 6:29-31; & 7:55- 8:3.
`February 5, 2008 Response to Office Action at 10.
`'250 Reexamination (No. 90/009,513) History:
`June 15, 2010 Response to Office Action at 26-30,
`52-54, & 74-76.
`
`- 8 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-14
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`5.
`
`“distinguishing information . . . is
`associated to impedance within the
`at least one path”
`(’012 patent, claim 31)
`
`“distinguishing information is
`represented by a change of
`impedance in the at least one path”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`'260 patent (incorporated by reference into the '012
`patent):
`Abstract; 5:27-32.
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`'012 Patent: Figures 19-22; 8:45-57; 12:62-13:63;
`14:14-15:20 & 15:33-16:64; and Claims 1, 3, 15,
`18-20, 31, 33, 45, 50
`‘012 Prosecution History:
`December 6, 2011 Amendment and Petition for
`Extension of Time at 25-30;
`June 9, 2011 Office Action at 2;
`March 25, 2011 Response to Restriction
`Requirement at 9-13, 16;
`October 29, 2009 Fifth Preliminary Amendment at
`25, 39;
`April 30, 2009 Third Preliminary Amendment at
`21, 30;
`April 3, 2009 Response to Notice of Non-
`Compliant Amendment at 22, 30;
`February 27, 2009 Second Preliminary
`Amendment at 24, 32;
`PCT/US98/11622 at 8;
`EP0852018;
`PCT/IB96/00223 at 21, 32, 37;
`PCT/US92/05936 at 15, 18;
`September 23, 2008 Application at 9-10, 25, 28,
`33-34, 36, & 45.
`
`- 9 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-15
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`6.
`
`“to convey information”
`(’107 patent, claims 1, 104)
`
`“to transmit a low frequency
`signal”
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250 at Claims 3, 4, 8, 17.
`'250 Prosecution History:
`August 6, 2007 Office Action at 2- 5;
`February 5, 2008 Amendment at 2-3 & 8-11;
`May 13, 2008 Notice of Allowance at 2-5 & 8;
`August 1, 2008 Amendment Accompanying RCE at
`25.
`U.S. Patent No. 6,650,622 at Claims 1, 3, 10, 12, 16,
`& 19-20.
`'622 Prosecution History:
`August 9, 1999 Application at 5, 7, 9, 21, 24, 28-31,
`34, 37, 39, 41, 44, 46, & 49-50;
`August 23, 2000 Response to Restriction
`Requirement and Preliminary Amendment at 3-4;
`December 20, 2000 Office Action at 6
`March 20, 2001 Amendment at 20-22;
`April 5, 2001 Substitute Amendment at 12-13, 15,
`17, & 20-24;
`January 4, 2002 Office Action at 3-5;
`June 24, 2002 Office Action at 2-4;
`October 23, 2002 Amendment at 4-7 & 9;
`March 6, 2003 Office Action at 2-4;
`June 6, 2003 Amendment After Final at 2-3 & 12.
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`’107 Patent: claims 1, 104; claim 1; 2:26-36; 2:63-
`3:7; 3:22-32; 6:13-25; 6:31-36; 6:54-63; 7:51-8:4;
`8:38-45; 8:48-51; 8:55-63; 8:65-9:5; 9:30-37;
`
`- 10 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-16
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`7.
`
`“BaseT”
`(’012 patent, claims 36, 56, 60)
`(’107 patent, claim 5)
`(’760 patent, claims 1, 31, 37, 59,
`69, 72, 73, 106, 112, 134, 142, 145)
`(’838 patent, claim 1)
`
`“twisted pair Ethernet in
`accordance with the 10BASE-T or
`100BASE-T standards”
`
`
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`9:41-44; 9:53-56; 9:57-59; 10:2-10:28; 12:1-
`12:18; 12:31-49
`’250 Patent: Abstract
`’250 Re-Exam Prosecution History:
`June 15, 2010 Amendment, Remarks at 24-30
`May 12, 2010 Examiner Interview summary
`June 15, 2010 Applicant Interview summary at 24-
`92
`’012 Prosecution History:
`February 2, 2012 Notice of Allowability at 2-7.
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`'012 Patent: 12:13-17; and Claims 36, 56, & 60.
`'107 Patent: claim 5
`'760 Patent: Claims 1, 31, 37, 59, 69, 72, 73, 106,
`112, 134, 142, & 145.
`'838 Patent: Claim 1.
`'012 Prosecution History:
`Dec. 6, 2011 Response to Office Action at 25-29.
`Mar. 25, 2011 Response to Restriction
`Requirement at 3-4, 6-12, 14-16.
`Oct. 29, 2009 5th Preliminary Amendment 5, 12,
`17, 22, 27, 30, 32-37.
`Apr. 3, 2009 Response to Notice of Non-
`Compliant Amendment at 2, 4, 10, 15, 19, 23, 26,
`27-29.
`WO98/57248 at 6-8, 13-15, 21, Fig. 3, Fig. 6c, &
`Fig. 10.
`
`- 11 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-17
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`JP H8-307476 at 2.
`WO96/23377 at 21, 26, 28, 32, 34, 37.
`Provisional App. No. 60/081,279 at 3, 11.
`WO99/53627 at 22-23.
`'107 Prosecution History:
`May 7, 2014 Office Action at 2-3.
`Jan. 15, 2014 Amendment and Petition for Extension
`of Time at 8, 24.
`July 15, 2013 Office Action at 5.
`Application at 26, 48.
`'760 Prosecution History:
`July 30, 2014 Notice of Allowability at 2.
`April 15, 2014 Revised Amendment and Petition for
`Extension of Time at 7-39, 41.
`WO 96/27967 at 28, 30.
`WO 96/28940 at 25, 27, Fig. 1.
`WO 96/28920 at 39, 41, 56, 59-61, Fig. 1, Fig. 6
`(Part I).
`Application at 26-27.
`'838 Prosecution History:
`March 4, 2015 Notice of Allowance at 2.
`November 24, 2014 Amendment After Final and
`Petition for Extension of Time at 2-4, 25, 36.
`May 22, 2014 Office Action at 4-5, 8.
`Jan. 24 2014 Amendment and Petition for
`Extension of Time at 6-8, 10, 25, 27-28.
`
`- 12 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-18
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`8.
`
`“powered-off” / “powered-off
`[Ethernet terminal equipment]” /
`“powered-off [end device]”
`(’107 patent, claims 103, 104, 107,
`111, 123, 125)
`(’760 patent, claims 72, 145)
`
`plain and ordinary meaning, i.e.,
`“without power”
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`July 24, 2013 IDS at 20, 22.
`U.S. Patent No. 5,460,260: Abstract, 3:31-37,5:51-
`54, clams 4, 11, 14, 17.
`U.S. Patent No. 7,457,250: Claims 50, 86, 122,
`126.
`’250 Prosecution History:
`EP 0639916A2 at 2:20, 6:15-cc.
`August 1, 2008 Amendment Accompanying RCE
`at 12, 17, 23-24, 26.
`Extrinsic Support:
`McGraw Hill Electronics Dictionary at 37.
`Desktop Encyclopedia of Telecommunications at
`120–131.
`10BASE-T IEEE 802.3i Standard (produced at
`Chrimar_DefsII0002557–2622).
`
`Intrinsic Support:
`’012 Patent: 1:60–65, 2:12–17, 3:3–10, 3:28–32,
`4:65–67, 5:33–40, 5:43–48, 5:58–61, 6:1–4, 8:17–
`25, 9:39–45, 12:48–50, 13:22–25, 14:14–38; and
`Claims 61, 64, 87, 128.
`’107 Patent: Claims 103–125.
`’760 Patent: Claims 18–20, 72, 91–93, 145, 165–
`167, 219.
`’838 Patent: Claim 88.
`’012 Prosecution History:
`December 6, 2011 Amendment and Petition for
`Extension of Time at 12–13, 16, 22, 25.
`April 3, 2009 Response to Notice of Non-
`
`- 13 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-19
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`Compliant Amendment at 4, 10, 15, 19, 23, 27, 29.
`WO 99/34591 at Abstract.
`EP 0852018B1 at 3, 32–34.
`WO 96/23377 at 21, 28, 37.
`WO 92/17968 at 12, 18.
`GB 2249919A at Abstract, 1, 3, 5, 10–13.
`Preliminary Amendment at 4–5.
`Application at 2, 6, 28, 30–31, 39–40, 43–44,
`Abstract.
`’107 Prosecution History:
`November 5, 2014 Amendment After Final at 15,
`21, 24–27.
`May 7, 2014 Office Action at 5–6, 17, 22.
`July 15, 2013 Office Action at 2–6.
`CN 2050662 at Abstract.
`JP 2226836 at Abstract.
`JP 4358493 at Abstract.
`JP 5012576 at Abstract.
`JP 6012579 at Abstract.
`JP 6261041 at Abstract.
`EP 0655839 at Abstract.
`WO 96/27967 at 9, 11.
`WO 96/28940 at 7–8, 10.
`WO 96/28920 at 7–8, 10, 54.
`CA 2183106 at 1–2.
`
`- 14 –
`-------------------------------------------------
`DEFENDANTS’ P.R. 4-2 DISCLOSURE
`(Case Nos. 3:16-cv-0186-SI, et al.)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`Chrimar Systems, Inc.
`Exhibit 2050-20
`IPR2016-01389 USPN 8,155,012
`
`

`

`No. Term / Phrase
`and Claim(s)
`
`Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support
`JP 10041964 at Abstract.
`JP 10066110 at Abstract.
`June 19, 2012 Response to Notice to File
`Corrected Application Papers at 1, Replacement
`Abstract.
`Application at 3, 5, 6, 10–12, 14–16–17, 20–21,
`27–28, 30–32, 37, 39, 49, Figs. 3, 5, 7.
`’760 Prosecution History:
`April 15, 2014 Revised Amendment and Petition
`for Extension of Time at 12–14, 18, 21–