throbber
Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 55 Page ID #:415
`
`Ryan E. Hatch (SBN 235577)
`rhatch@linerlaw.com
`Jason L. Haas (SBN 217290)
`jhaas@linerlaw.com
`LINER LLP
`1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90024.3518
`Telephone: (310) 500-3500
`Facsimile:
`(310) 500-3501
`Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SIGNAL IP, INC., a California
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,
`INC., a California corporation;
`HONDA OF AMERICA MRG, INC.,
`an Ohio corporation,
`Defendant.
`
`AND RELATED CASES
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`(Related to 2:14-cv-02962-JAK
`(JEMx); SA CV14-00497-JAK (JEMx);
`8:14-cv-00491-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-
`02963 JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-02457-
`JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03106-JAK
`(JEMx); 2:14-cv-03111-JAK (JEMx);
`LA CV14-03109 JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-
`03105-JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03107-
`JAK (JEMx); 2:14-cv-03113-JAK
`(JEMx); 2:14-cv-03108-JAK (JEMx);
`2:14-cv-03114-JAK (JEMx))
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`Markman Hearing: March 16, 2015
`Time:
` 10:00 a.m.
`Crtrm.: 750
`The Hon. John A. Kronstadt
`Trial Date:
`TBD
`
`IPR2016-01382 - Ex. 1008
`Toyota Motor Corp., Petitioner
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 2 of 55 Page ID #:416
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`II.
`
`Page
`CONSTRUCTION OF TERMS UPON WHICH PARTIES AGREE .............1
`PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EACH DISPUTED CLAIM
`TERM AND IDENTIFICATION OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE................3
`A.
`‘927 Patent ..............................................................................................3
`B.
`‘375 Patent ............................................................................................11
`C.
`‘486 Patent ............................................................................................18
`D.
`‘601 Patent ............................................................................................20
`E.
`‘007 Patent ............................................................................................30
`F.
`‘374 Patent ............................................................................................39
`G.
`‘775 Patent ............................................................................................42
`IDENTIFICATION OF MOST SIGNIFICANT TERMS..............................46
`A.
`Signal’s Statement.................................................................................46
`B.
`Defendants’ Statement ..........................................................................46
`IV. ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF TIME NECESSARY FOR THE
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING .........................................................48
`A.
`Signal’s Statement.................................................................................48
`B.
`Defendants’ Statement ..........................................................................48
`V. DESCRIPTION OF EXPERT WITNESS PROPOSED TESTIMONY ........48
`A.
`Signal’s Statement.................................................................................48
`B.
`Defendants’ Statement (not including VWGoA and Bentley) .............48
`C.
`VWGoA and Bentley Statement...........................................................49
`
`III.
`
`i
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:21)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 3 of 55 Page ID #:417
`
`Pursuant to Standing Patent Rule (“S.P.R.”) 3.4 and the Court’s Minute Order
`of September 15, 2014 (Dkt. 38 in Case No. 2:14-cv-02454) (“Minute Order”)
`Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc. (“Signal”) and Defendants American Honda Motor Co. and
`Honda of America Mfg., Inc. (collectively “Honda”), Nissan North America, Inc.
`(“Nissan”), Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (“Mitsubishi”), Mazda Motor of
`America, Inc. (“Mazda”), Subaru of America, Inc. (“Subaru”), Kia Motors America,
`Inc. (“KMA”), BMW of North America, LLC (“BMWNA”), Volvo Cars of North
`America, LLC (“Volvo”), Mercedes-Benz USA LLC (“MBUSA”), Volkswagen
`Group of America (“VWGoA”) and Bentley Motors, Inc. (“Bentley”), Jaguar Land
`Rover North America, LLC (“JLRNA”), and Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
`(“PCNA”) (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby submit their Joint Claim
`Construction and Prehearing Statement for U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,714,927 (“the ‘927
`Patent”), 5,732,375 (“the ‘375 Patent”), 6,434,486 (“the ‘486 Patent”), 6,775,601
`(“the ‘601 Patent”), 6,012,007 (“the ‘007 Patent”), 5,463,374 (“the ‘374 Patent”),
`and 5,954,775 (“the ‘775 Patent”) (Collectively “Patents-in-Suit” or “Asserted
`Patents”).
`CONSTRUCTION OF TERMS UPON WHICH PARTIES AGREE1
`I.
`The below chart reflects the constructions agreed to between Signal and the
`Defendants accused of infringing the patents and claims noted in the first column of
`the chart. Defendants take no position on (and do not agree to any construction for)
`claims that are not asserted in their particular cases.
`
`1 Defendants VWGoA and Bentley take no position on the constructions offered in
`this Section I. VWGoA and Bentley contend only that certain terms in the asserted
`patents are indefinite, as set forth in Section II below. VWGoA and Bentley further
`contend that the other terms in the patents asserted against them require no
`construction other than “plain and ordinary meaning.” Rather than repeat the phrase
`“plain and ordinary meaning” in each section below, VWGoA and Bentley simply
`note their position here. VWGoA and Bentley reserve the right to contend that any
`specific construction proposed below by any party is incorrect.
`1
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:22)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 4 of 55 Page ID #:418
`
`Terms (& Claims)
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`“blind spot”
`
`(‘927 Patent, Claim 1)
`
`
`
`“relative vehicle speed”
`
`(‘927 Patent, Claim 1)
`
`“alert signal”
`
`(‘927 Patent, Claim 1)
`
`An area on a side or on a side and to the rear
`of the host vehicle not visible to the driver
`through the mirrors
`Speed in relation to another vehicle.
`
`A signal for alerting the driver
`
`“detecting target vehicle
`presence and producing an alert
`command”
`
`Detecting that the target vehicle is present at
`least partially in the blind spot and producing
`an alert command
`
`(‘927 Patent, Claim 1)
`
`“total threshold force”
`
`(‘375 Patent, Claim 1)
`
`A minimum force that allows airbag
`deployment based on the total force sensed by
`the entire sensor array
`
`“providing an alarm”
`
`Providing a warning for the driver
`
`(‘486 Patent, Claims 21 & 28)
`
`“traction motor”
`
`An electric motor used to propel a vehicle2
`
`(‘601 Patent, Claims 8, 10-11,
`15, 17)
`
`“force”
`
`(’375 Patent, claim 1)
`
`Pressure that is indicative of weight
`
`“vehicle torque demand”
`
`Torque requested by the driver
`
`(’601 Patent, claim 8)
`
`“means for storing
`identification codes from the
`
`Function:
`
`2 BMWNA agrees to the construction of “traction motor,” but takes no position on
`the constructions of the terms agreed upon by Signal and the other defendants.
`2
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:23)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 5 of 55 Page ID #:419
`
`Terms (& Claims)
`
`Agreed Construction
`
`transmitted sign up messages
`for comparison with
`subsequently transmitted data
`messages to differentiate data
`transmitted from various tire
`locations”
`
`(‘374 Patent, Claim 3)
`
`“yaw rate sensor”
`
`(’486 Patent, Claims 27, 34)
`
`“storing identification codes from the
`transmitted sign-up messages for comparison
`with subsequently transmitted data messages
`to differentiate data transmitted from various
`tire locations”
`
`Structure:
`
`the processor 24 and its associated non-
`volatile memory.
`
`Sensor that measures a vehicle’s deviation
`from a straight course
`
`II.
`
`PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EACH DISPUTED CLAIM TERM
`AND IDENTIFICATION OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
`A.
`‘927 Patent
`The ‘927 Patent is asserted in these actions against defendants Honda, KMA,
`Mazda, Nissan, Volvo, JLRNA, MBUSA, BMWNA, VWGoA, and PCNA.
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`Defendants’ Position
`
`1.
`
`“In a radar system
`wherein a host
`vehicle uses radar
`to detect a target
`vehicle in a blind
`spot of the host
`vehicle driver, a
`method of
`improving the
`perceived zone of
`coverage response
`of automotive
`radar comprising
`the steps of”
`
`Signal is of the view that
`this term does not require a
`construction by the Court,
`and should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning. However, if the
`Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the
`following:
`
`The preamble is limiting.
`
`Evidence: ‘927 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 1 and 3-7;
`
`KMA, Mazda, Nissan,
`Volvo, JLRNA, MBUSA,
`PCNA, BMWNA: The
`preamble is limiting.
`
`Honda: Preamble does not
`limit claim to radar.
`
`Field of the Invention;
`Abstract; Figs. 3d, 4, cols.
`2:28-32; 2:62-65; 3:52 –
`4:21; 4:35:44; claim 1.
`
`3
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:24)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 6 of 55 Page ID #:420
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`2.
`
`“variable sustain
`time”
`
`(Claims 1 and 2)
`
`1:23-27, 31-39, 45-67; 2:1-
`6, 15-34, 41-59, 62-65; 3:2-
`13, 41-51, 57-4:21; 4:22-
`49; 4:56-61; 5:1-25,
`Claims.
`
`Prosecution history of the
`‘927 Patent, e.g. at Notice
`of Allowance
`(SIG00001331 –
`SIG00001333), e.g. p. 6.
`
`Dictionary definitions of
`Blind Spot, SIG000001704.
`
`Dictionary definitions of
`Radar, SIG000001710.
`
`Signal is of the view that
`this term does not require a
`construction by the Court,
`and should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning. However, if the
`Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the
`following:
`
`A variable period of time
`for which the alert signal
`persists
`
`Evidence: ‘927 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 1 and 3-7;
`1:23-27, 31-39, 45-67; 2:1-
`6, 15-34, 41-59, 62-65; 3:2-
`13, 41-51, 57-4:21; 4:22-
`49; 4:56-61; 5:1-25,
`Claims.
`
`Honda, JLRNA, KMA
`Mazda, MBUSA, Nissan,
`PCNA, Volvo: “a variable
`period of time for which the
`alert signal persists after a
`target vehicle is no longer
`detected”
`
`Additional clarifying
`statement: The ’927 Patent
`distinguishes “variable
`sustain time” from a
`separate concept of “hold”
`time. A “hold” time is the
`minimum time for which
`the signal persists after a
`target vehicle is no longer
`detected. The “variable
`sustain time” is used when
`the alert signal time has
`been equal to or greater
`than the threshold time. The
`minimal “hold” time is
`
`4
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:25)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 7 of 55 Page ID #:421
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`Prosecution history of the
`‘927 Patent, e.g. at Notice
`of Allowance
`(SIG00001331 –
`SIG00001333), e.g. p. 6.
`
`used when the alert signal
`time is less than the
`threshold time.
`
`Abstract; Figs. 2, 3a-3d, 4,
`5, 7; cols. 1:45-55; 2:1-6;
`2:15-34; 3:52 – 4:44, 5:1-
`16; claims 1, 7-12.
`
`File History: Notice of
`Allowance at 2.
`
`Deposition Transcript of
`Dr. Petros Ioannou
`(Rough). See, e.g., 41:7-
`11, 45:17-22, 47:6-14,
`49:2-50:19, 88:22-94:14.
`
`IBM Dictionary of
`Computing, p. 728 (1994)
`(“variable . . . (9) Contrast
`with constant.”); The IEEE
`Standard Dictionary of
`Electrical and Electronics
`Terms, p. 1174 (6th Ed.
`1996) (“variable . . . (3) A
`quantity or data item whose
`value can change . . .
`Contrast: constant.”);
`American Heritage
`Dictionary ((variable): 1b.
`Inconstant; 3. Mathematics
`Having no fixed
`quantitative value); Oxford
`Dictionary ((variable): Not
`consistent); Collins
`Dictionary ((variable): “1.
`Liable to or capable of
`change; 2. Lacking
`constancy; 3. Having a
`
`5
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:26)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 8 of 55 Page ID #:422
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`range of possible values; 6.
`(of an electrical component
`or device) designed so that
`a characteristic property,
`such as resistance, can be
`varied”); Cambridge
`Dictionary ((variable):
`“likely to change, or
`showing change or
`difference as a
`characteristic”); Oxford
`Amer. Eng. Dictionary
`((sustain): “cause to
`continue or be prolonged
`for an extended period or
`without interruption”);
`American Heritage
`Dictionary ((sustain): “to
`keep in existence; maintain,
`continue, or prolong”)
`Collins Dictionary
`((sustain): “to maintain or
`prolong”); Cambridge
`Amer. Dictionary
`((sustain): “to cause or
`allow something to
`continue for a period of
`time”).
`
`Deposition Transcript of
`Dr. Petros Ioannou
`(Rough), 39:19-42:24;
`49:7-50:19; 81:16-84:18.
`
`BMWNA: “the length of
`time for which an alert is
`sustained once the alert
`lasts longer than a threshold
`time. The length of the
`sustain time varies with the
`
`6
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:27)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 9 of 55 Page ID #:423
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`relative speed between the
`host and target vehicles”
`
`Claims 1, 2
`Abstract
`Figs. 3a-3d, 4, 5
`Col. 2, ll. 15-34
`Col. 4, ll. 4-21, 32-49
`Col. 5, ll. 1-44
`
`Expert Deposition
`Transcript of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou (Rough), 25:10-
`94:12.
`
`Honda, Mazda, Nissan,
`Volvo, JLRNA, MBUSA,
`PCNA: Indefinite under
`§ 112, paragraph 2.
`
`Expert Declaration of Azim
`Eskandarian, D.Sc.
`Cols. 2:32-34; 4:4-7; 4:8-
`21; 5:17-25.
`
`Declaration of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou; Deposition
`Transcript of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou (Rough), 25:10-
`94:12
`
`Honda: Alternatively,
`“wherein the alert signal
`remains active when a
`target vehicle is beyond the
`range that the object
`detection system can
`detect”
`
`3.
`
`“wherein the zone
`of coverage
`appears to
`increase
`according to the
`variable sustain
`time”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`Signal is of the view that
`this term does not require a
`construction by the Court,
`and should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning. However, if the
`Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the
`following:
`
`Wherein the zone of
`coverage as perceived by
`the vehicle driver appears
`to increase according to a
`variable sustain time.
`
`Evidence: ‘927 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 1 and 3-7;
`1:23-27, 31-39, 45-67; 2:1-
`6, 15-34, 41-59, 62-65; 3:2-
`13, 41-51, 57-4:21; 4:22-
`49; 4:56-61; 5:1-25,
`
`7
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`(cid:28)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 10 of 55 Page ID #:424
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`Claims.
`
`Prosecution history of the
`‘927 Patent, e.g. at Notice
`of Allowance
`(SIG00001331 –
`SIG00001333), e.g. p. 6.
`
`Expert Declaration of Dr.
`Petros Ioannou, e.g. at ¶¶
`20-25; Eskandarian Decl., ¶
`25; ‘927 Patent, 2:32-34,
`4:4-7.
`
`Expert Deposition
`Transcript of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou (Rough), 25:10-
`94:12.
`
`4.
`
`“a threshold time”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Signal is of the view that
`this term does not require a
`construction by the Court,
`and should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning. However, if the
`Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the
`following:
`
`Cols. 4:18-20; Fig. 4. See
`generally Declaration and
`Deposition Transcript of
`Dr. Petros Ioannou
`(Rough).
`
`VWGoA/Bentley:
`Indefinite
`
`The claim term fails to
`inform those skilled in the
`art of the scope of the
`claimed invention with
`reasonable certainty. There
`is an absence of any
`intrinsic evidence that
`would support construction
`of this term.
`
`For example, the term as
`used in claim 1 is
`inherently subjective, and
`depends on the perception
`of the user. The patent fails
`to define when or how the
`claimed zone of coverage
`“appears to increase
`according to the variable
`sustain time.”
`JLRNA and Mazda:
`
`“amount of time that must
`be exceeded or equaled to
`trigger the variable sustain
`time”
`
`Abstract; Figs. 5, 6; cols.
`2:15-34, 4:22-64; 5:1-16;
`claims 7-12.
`
`8
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:19)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 11 of 55 Page ID #:425
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`Amount of time that must
`be exceeded or equaled
`
`Evidence: ‘927 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 1 and 3-7;
`1:23-27, 31-39, 45-67; 2:1-
`6, 15-34, 41-59, 62-65; 3:2-
`13, 41-51, 57-4:21; 4:22-
`49; 4:56-61; 5:1-25,
`Claims.
`
`Prosecution history of the
`‘927 Patent, e.g. at Notice
`of Allowance
`(SIG00001331 –
`SIG00001333), e.g. p. 6.
`
`Dictionary definitions of
`Threshold, SIG000001712.
`
`File History: Notice of
`Allowance at 2.
`
`Deposition Transcript of
`Dr. Petros Ioannou
`(Rough). See, e.g., 88:22-
`94:14.
`
`Oxford Dictionary
`((threshold): “2. The
`magnitude or intensity that
`must be exceeded for a
`certain reaction,
`phenomenon, result, or
`condition to occur or be
`manifested”); American
`Heritage Dictionary
`((threshold): “4. The point
`that must be exceeded to
`begin producing a given
`effect or result or to elicit a
`response.”); Collins English
`Dictionary ((threshold): “5.
`a level or point at which
`something would happen,
`would cease to happen, or
`would take effect, become
`true, etc.; 6. The minimum
`intensity or value of a
`signal, etc., that will
`produce a response or
`specified effect”);
`MacMillan Dictionary
`((threshold): “1. A limit at
`which an arrangement
`changes. For example a tax
`threshold is the level of
`income or profit at which
`you start to pay a tax; 1.a. a
`level at which something
`
`9
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:20)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 12 of 55 Page ID #:426
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`happens. For example, you
`hearing threshold is the
`level of sound that you can
`hear, and you pain
`threshold is the level of
`pain that you can feel
`without suffering or
`complaining”); Merriam-
`Webster Dictionary
`((threshold): “a level, point,
`or value above which
`something is true or will
`take place and below which
`it is not or will not”)
`
`Honda, Mazda, Nissan,
`Volvo, JLRNA, MBUSA,
`PCNA:
`
`Indefinite under § 112,
`paragraph 2.
`
`Expert Declaration of Azim
`Eskandarian, D.Sc.
`
`Cols. 2:32-34; 4:4-7; 4:8-
`21; 5:17-25.
`
`Declaration of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou; Deposition
`Transcript of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou (Rough). See, e.g.,
`25:10-94:12
`
`VWGoA/Bentley:
`Indefinite
`
`The claim term fails to
`inform those skilled in the
`art of the scope of the
`claimed invention with
`
`5.
`
`“improving the
`perceived zone of
`coverage”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`Signal is of the view that
`this term does not require a
`construction by the Court,
`and should be given its
`plain and ordinary
`meaning. However, if the
`Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the
`following:
`
`Improving the perceived
`zone of coverage,
`compared to an
`interrupted signal.
`
`Evidence: ‘927 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 1 and 3-7;
`1:23-27, 31-39, 45-67; 2:1-
`6, 15-34, 41-59, 62-65; 3:2-
`13, 41-51, 57-4:21; 4:22-
`49; 4:56-61; 5:1-25,
`
`10
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:21)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 13 of 55 Page ID #:427
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`Claims.
`
`Prosecution history of the
`‘927 Patent, e.g. at Notice
`of Allowance
`(SIG00001331 –
`SIG00001333), e.g. p. 6.
`
`Expert Declaration of Dr.
`Petros Ioannou, e.g. at ¶¶
`20-25; ‘927 Patent, Fig. 3c,
`3d, 3:52-4:7.
`
`Expert Deposition
`Transcript of Dr. Petros
`Ioannou (Rough), 25:10-
`94:12.
`
`reasonable certainty. There
`is an absence of any
`intrinsic evidence that
`would support construction
`of this term.
`
`For example, the term as
`used in claim 1 is
`inherently subjective, and
`depends on the perception
`of the user. The patent fails
`to define when or how the
`claimed “perceived” zone
`of coverage is improved.
`
`‘375 Patent
`B.
`The ‘375 Patent is asserted in these actions against defendants Honda, KMA,
`Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, BMWNA, and VWGoA.
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`6.
`
`“force
`distribution”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`Honda, Mazda,
`Mitsubishi, Nissan:
`
`“a pattern of pressure
`distribution measured by
`sampling a plurality of
`seat sensors”
`
`Cols. 1:59-2:3; Abstract.
`
`A distribution of force or
`pressure on the seat
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`11
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:22)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 14 of 55 Page ID #:428
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`Honda, KMA, Mazda,
`Mitsubishi, Nissan:
`
`“on the top surface of the
`seat, just under the seat
`cover”
`
`Abstract; Fig. 2; cols.
`1:59-61; 2:4-6; 2:8;
`3:21-32; 4:65-5:8; 5:31-
`33.
`
`‘007 patent, col. 1:31-45.
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`“on the passenger
`seat”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Located such that weight on
`the passenger seat can be
`detected.
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`‘007 Patent, 1:39-43. ‘007
`Patent, 1:31-42, citing U.S.
`Pat. No. 5,474,327; U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,474,327, 4:37-5:3.
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`
`7.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`12
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:23)
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 15 of 55 Page ID #:429
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`8.
`
`“seat area”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`9.
`
`“sensor array”/
`“array of force
`sensors”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`Area of the seat.
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`‘007 Patent, 1:39-43. ‘007
`Patent, 1:31-42, citing U.S.
`Pat. No. 5,474,327; U.S. Pat.
`No. 5,474,327, 4:37-5:3.
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`Honda, KMA, Mazda,
`Mitsubishi, Nissan:
`
`“area of the bottom seat
`cushion”
`
`Abstract; Figs. 2, 4, 7, 8;
`cols. 1:59 – 2:3; 2:12-21;
`3:21-32; 3:48-67; 4:17-
`5:33; Mar. 27, 1997
`Examiner Office Action;
`July 3, 1997 Applicant
`Amendment and
`Response; Sept. 10, 1997
`Notice of Allowance;
`U.S. Patent No.
`5,474,327; U.S. Patent
`No. 6,012,007.
`
`Honda, KMA, Mazda,
`Mitsubishi, Nissan:
`
`“an ordered or
`symmetrical grouping of
`[force] sensors arranged
`in rows and columns”
`
`Ordered grouping of [force]
`sensors.
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`13
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:24)
`
`Abstract; Figs. 1-4, 7, 8;
`cols. 1: 59 – 2:20; 3:21-
`47; 3:66-4:2; 4:17 –
`5:11; Mar. 27, 1997
`Examiner Office Action;
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 16 of 55 Page ID #:430
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`Dictionary definitions of
`Array, SIG000001703.
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`July 3, 1997 Applicant
`Amendment and
`Response; Sept. 10,
`1997 Notice of
`Allowance; U.S. Patent
`No. 5,474,327; U.S.
`Patent No. 5,570,903.
`
`Webster’s II New
`College Dictionary
`(1999), pg. 62 ((array):
`“a rectangular
`arrangement of
`quantities in rows and
`columns, as in a
`matrix”); Merriam-
`Webster’s School
`Dictionary (1999), pg.
`48 ((array): “Regular
`order or arrangement;
`An imposing group:
`large number; A group
`of mathematical
`elements (as numbers or
`letters) arranged in rows
`and columns.”)
`
`10. “seat area
`threshold force”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`Honda and Mazda: “A
`minimum force different
`than the total threshold
`force that allows airbag
`deployment based on the
`forces measured by the
`sensors in only one of
`the seat areas.”
`
`A minimum force that allows
`airbag deployment based on
`the forces in one of the seat
`14
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:25)
`
`Abstact; Figs. 2-9; Cols.
`3:48-67; 4:1-16; 5:12-
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 17 of 55 Page ID #:431
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`30; Claims; Prosecution
`History at Response
`(SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g., p.
`SIG00000706.
`
`Honda:
`
`“comparing the pressure
`in each seat area to
`identify if pressure is
`concentrated in one
`area”
`
`Abstract; Figs. 4, 7, 8;
`cols. 1:59 – 2:3; 2:12-21;
`3:21-32; 3:48-67; 4:17 –
`5:30; Mar. 27, 1997
`Examiner Office Action;
`July 3, 1997 Applicant
`Amendment and
`Response; Sept. 10, 1997
`Notice of Allowance.
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`areas.
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`Dictionary definitions of
`Threshold, SIG000001712.
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`11. “determining the
`existence of a
`local pressure
`area when the
`calculated total
`force is
`concentrated in
`one of said seat
`areas”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Determining if pressure is
`concentrated in one seat area
`
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`
`‘375 Patent, 4:18-29.
`
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`15
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:26)
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 18 of 55 Page ID #:432
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`12. “calculating the
`total force of the
`sensor array”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`
`Dictionary definitions of
`Local, SIG000001708.
`
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning. However,
`if the Court determines that a
`construction is necessary,
`Signal proposes the following:
`
`Calculating the total force
`sensed by the entire sensor
`array.
`
`Evidence: ‘375 Patent,
`Abstract; Figs. 2-9; 1:44-2:21,
`63-3:10; 3:21-47; 3:51-4:17;
`4:18-29, 30-5:37, Claims.
`
`‘375 Patent, 4:9-15.
`
`Prosecution history of the ‘375
`Patent, e.g. at First Office
`Action (SIG00000492 –
`SIG00000499), e.g. p. 40;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`
`Mazda, Mitsubishi,
`Nissan:
`
`“calculating the total
`force sensed by the
`entire sensor array”
`
`Honda:
`
`“calculating based on the
`value from each sensor
`in the entire sensor
`array”
`
`Cols. 1:65-2:3; 3:48-50;
`Fig. 4.
`
`16
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`(cid:20)(cid:27)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 46 Filed 01/30/15 Page 19 of 55 Page ID #:433
`
`Terms & Claims Plaintiff’s Position
`
`Defendants’ Position
`
`13. “concentrated”
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 25;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 26;
`Response (SIG00000695 –
`SIG00000712), e.g. p. 27;
`Notice of Allowability
`(SIG00000723), e.g. p. 10;
`Reasons for Allowance
`(SIG00000724 –
`SIG00000727), e.g. p. 6.
`Signal is of the view that this
`term does not require a
`construction by the Court, and
`should be given its plain and
`ordinary meaning.
`
`‘375 Patent, Abstract; Figs. 2-
`9; 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket