throbber
Influence of reactor wall conditions on etch processes in inductively
`coupled fluorocarbon plasmas
`M. Schaepkens, R. C. M. Bosch,a) T. E. F. M. Standaert, and G. S. Oehrleinb)
`Department of Physics, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 12222
`J. M. Cook
`Lam Research Corporation, Fremont, California 94538-6470
`共Received 25 June 1997; accepted 30 January 1998兲
`
`The influence of reactor wall conditions on the characteristics of high density fluorocarbon plasma
`etch processes has been studied. Results obtained during the etching of oxide, nitride, and silicon in
`an inductively coupled plasma source fed with various feedgases, such as CHF3 , C3F6 , and
`C3F6/H2 , indicate that the reactor wall temperature is an important parameter in the etch process.
`Adequate temperature control can increase oxide etch selectivity over nitride and silicon. The loss
`of fluorocarbon species from the plasma to the walls is reduced as the wall temperature increased.
`The fluorocarbon deposition on a cooled substrate surface increases concomitantly, resulting in a
`more efficient suppression of silicon and nitride etch rates, whereas oxide etch rates remain nearly
`constant. © 1998 American Vacuum Society. 关S0734-2101共98兲03504-0兴
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`Etching of trenches or contact holes into silicon dioxide is
`an indispensable process in modern integrated circuit fabri-
`cation technology. A high oxide etch rate and etch selectivity
`of oxide to silicon and nitride are important requirements
`that need to be met in order for etch processes to be appli-
`cable in industrial manufacturing. Etch processes employing
`low pressure high density fluorocarbon discharges are ex-
`pected to meet
`these demands, and have been studied
`extensively.1–6
`Low pressure high density fluorocarbon plasma processes,
`however, have been found to suffer from process drifts.7 At
`low pressure, plasma-wall interactions are of significant im-
`portance in determining the discharge chemistry. Process
`drifts have been attributed to changes in reactor wall
`conditions.8,9 In order to limit changes in reactor wall condi-
`tions and to create a stable and reproducible process environ-
`ment, it is common in semiconductor processing to ‘‘sea-
`son’’ a reactor. A fundamental understanding of
`the
`important mechanisms operating in the conditioning proce-
`dure is lacking, however.
`This article presents results of a study of the influence of
`reactor wall conditions on the stability of etch processes.
`Results obtained during the etching of oxide, nitride, and
`silicon in an inductively coupled plasma source fed with
`various feedgases, such as CHF3 , C3F6 , and C3F6/H2 , will
`be reported. Explanations of the observed effects will be pre-
`sented.
`
`II. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
`The high-density plasma source used in this work is a
`radio frequency inductively coupled plasma 共ICP兲 source of
`planar coil design. This plasma source has also been referred
`
`a兲Permanent address: Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513,
`5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
`b兲Electronic mail: oehrlein@cnsibm.albany.edu
`
`to in literature as transformer coupled plasma 共TCP兲 and ra-
`dio frequency induction 共RFI兲 source. A schematic outline of
`the ICP reactor used is shown in Fig. 1. It is similar to the
`one described by Keller et al.10
`The apparatus consists of an ultrahigh vacuum 共UHV兲
`compatible processing chamber in which the plasma source
`and a wafer holding electrostatic chuck are located. The cen-
`ter part of the ICP source is a planar, 160 mm diameter
`induction coil that is separated from the process chamber by
`a 19.6 mm thick, 230 mm diameter quartz window. The coil
`is powered through a matching network by a 13.56 MHz,
`0–2000 W power supply. The results presented here were all
`obtained at an inductive power level of 1400 W.
`A plasma confinement ring that can hold multipole mag-
`nets is located below the quartz window. For this work, no
`magnets were placed into the confinement ring, but the ring
`itself confines the plasma. The confinement ring has poor
`thermal contact with other parts of the reactor and its tem-
`perature cannot be controlled independently. In the rest of
`this article, the confinement ring will be referred to as the
`reactor wall 共since this is the surface that the plasma is in
`contact with兲. The inner diameter of the confinement ring is
`20 cm.
`Wafers with diameters of 125 mm are placed on a bipolar
`electrostatic chuck during processing. The chuck is located 7
`cm downstream from the ICP source and allows the wafer to
`be RF biased and cooled during processing. A helium pres-
`sure of 5 Torr is applied to the backside of the wafer during
`the experiment to achieve a good thermal conduction be-
`tween the wafer and the chuck.11 The electrostatic chuck is
`cooled by a refrigerator. A variable frequency RF power sup-
`ply 共500 kHz–40 MHz, 0–300 W兲 is used to bias the wafer
`for etching experiments. The experiments reported in this
`work were all performed at 3.4 MHz.
`Substrates placed at the center of a wafer can be moni-
`tored by in situ ellipsometry. Plasma diagnostics like a re-
`tractable Langmuir probe and optical emission spectroscopy
`
`2099
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16(cid:132)4(cid:133), Jul/Aug 1998
`
`0734-2101/98/16(cid:132)4(cid:133)/2099/9/$15.00
`
`©1998 American Vacuum Society
`
`2099
`
`IP Bridge Exhibit 2014
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01376
`Page 0001
`
`

`

`2100
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2100
`
`FIG. 1. Schematic of ICP source setup.
`
`FIG. 2. Nitride etch rate and oxide etch rate as a function of the time that the
`plasma was switched on 共1400 W inductive power, 6 mTorr operating pres-
`sure, ⫺100 V self-bias兲.
`
`共OES兲 can be used for gas-phase characterization. With the
`retractable Langmuir probe it is possible to make a scan of
`the ion current density over 70% of the wafer. The values
`reported here were measured in the center of the reactor, 2
`cm above the wafer surface.
`The process chamber is pumped using a 450 l /s turbo-
`molecular pump backed by a Roots blower and a mechanical
`pump. The process gases are admitted into the reactor
`through a gas inlet ring located just under the quartz window.
`The pressure is measured with a capacitance manometer.
`Pressure control is achieved by an automatic throttle valve in
`the pump line.
`The ICP chamber is connected to a wafer handling cluster
`system that allows all sample transport to occur under ultra-
`high vacuum conditions. Processed samples can be trans-
`ported from the ICP reactor to a surface analysis chamber for
`X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy 共XPS兲 without exposure to
`air.
`
`III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`A. Investigation of process drift
`
`It was found in an earlier study by this group that oxide
`could be etched at a high rate and at the same time selec-
`tively to nitride in a C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/15 sccm兲 discharge at
`high inductive power 共1400 W兲 and low operating pressure
`共6 mTorr兲 when a sufficiently high RF bias power 共200 W
`corresponding to ⫺100 V self-bias兲 is applied to the wafer.12
`In that study, however, the samples were etched for only a
`relatively small time period. When etching for longer times,
`it was observed that etch rates of both oxide and nitride were
`dependent on the time that the plasma was switched on; see
`Fig. 2. The nitride etch rate decreases significantly as a func-
`tion of processing time, whereas the oxide etch rate remains
`at a near constant value. This results in an increase of oxide-
`to-nitride selectivity with etching time.
`Two time-dependent processes were initially suggested to
`be responsible for the changes in etch characteristics as a
`function of time, namely 共1兲 fluorocarbon contamination of
`the reactor walls during processing and 共2兲 increasing tem-
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 16, No. 4, Jul/Aug 1998
`
`perature of the reactor. In order to distinguish between these
`processes,
`the following experiment was performed; see
`Fig. 3.
`Blanket nitride samples were etched at the same condi-
`tions and the rates are plotted versus processing time. Results
`for three consecutive etch experiments are shown. The first
`experiment was performed starting with a reactor that has
`been cleaned with an oxygen plasma prior to the experiment.
`The reactor is initially at room temperature. In between ex-
`periments the reactor was allowed to cool down, but no oxy-
`gen plasma cleaning was performed.
`It can be seen that during each run there is a significant
`decrease of the nitride etch rate. The initial value of the etch
`rate in each run stays at a constant level. This experiment
`
`FIG. 3. Nitride etch rate as a function of processing time for three consecu-
`tive etch experiments. The first experiment was performed starting with a
`reactor that has no fluorocarbon material deposited at the walls 共reactor was
`cleaned with an oxygen plasma兲. Between the etch experiments the reactor
`was allowed to cool to room temperature, but no oxygen plasma cleaning
`was performed 共1400 W inductive power, 6 mTorr operating pressure, ⫺100
`V self-bias兲.
`
`IPR2016-01376 Page 0002
`
`

`

`2101
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2101
`
`FIG. 4. Wall temperature as a function of processing time. The triangles are
`experimental data; the curves show the model.
`
`shows that the heating of the reactor is the process that is
`dominant in producing the observed effect.
`
`B. Time dependence of the reactor wall temperature
`
`The time dependence of the wall temperature has been
`measured by attaching a thermocouple to the confinement
`ring. The resulting data for both a 600 and 1400 W C3F6/H2
`共40 sccm/15 sccm兲 plasma at 6 mTorr operating pressure is
`plotted in Fig. 4. Similar experiments were obtained using
`different fluorocarbon gases, such as CHF3 and C3F6 . The
`time dependence of the reactor wall temperature changed
`little with feedgas chemistry.
`A simple model that describes the time dependence of the
`wall temperature T has been developed. In the model it is
`assumed that the power dissipated in the wall results from
`collisions of ions with the wall. The ions have an energy
`equal to the sheath voltage between the floating wall and the
`plasma. The energy loss factor for the wall is assumed to be
`Stefan-Boltzmann radiation. The resulting differential equa-
`tion is
`m(cid:149)c(cid:149)dT/dt⫽ICD(cid:149) A(cid:149)V sh⫺e(cid:149)␴(cid:149)A(cid:149)共T 4⫺T RT
`4 兲,
`where m is the mass of the confinement ring, c is the heat
`capacitance of the anodized aluminum confinement ring,
`ICD is the ion current density, A is the area of reactor wall,
`V sh is the sheath voltage between the floating wall and the
`plasma, e is the emissivity of the anodized aluminum con-
`finement ring, ␴ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, and T RT
`is the room temperature.
`The ion current density was measured by Langmuir probe
`measurement. The sheath voltage was calculated to be 15 V
`by using an estimated value of 3 eV for the electron tempera-
`ture. Values between 0.4 and 0.5 for the emissivity were
`determined from the cooling rate of the wall after the plasma
`was shut off. The differential equation was solved numeri-
`cally, resulting in the curves plotted in Fig. 4. The agreement
`between the model and the experimental data is satisfactory.
`
`共1兲
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`FIG. 5. 共A兲Passive deposition rates are measured as a function of time on a
`non-cooled wafer. Three fluorocarbon feedgas chemistries are compared,
`i.e., CHF3 共40 sccm兲, C3F6 共40 sccm兲, and C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/15 sccm兲 at
`1400 W inductive power and 6 mTorr operating pressure. The processing
`time is proportional to the wafer temperature. For C3F6 the 600 W data are
`also included. The temperature/time correspondence is different in this case.
`共B兲 The etch rates of fluorocarbon films deposited at the same conditions at
`which they are etched are measured as a function of RF bias power at 1400
`W inductive power, 6 mTorr operating pressure plasmas fed with various
`fluorocarbon gases, i.e., CHF3 共40 sccm兲, C3F6 共40 sccm兲, and C3F6 H2 共40
`sccm/15 sccm兲.
`
`C. Temperature dependence of plasma–wall
`interactions
`
`In order to study the temperature dependence of the pro-
`cesses occurring at a non-biased wall that has poor thermal
`contact, an experiment was performed on a non-biased wafer
`that is lifted above the chuck by three small Teflon studs.
`The thermal conductivity between the cooled electrostatic
`chuck and the wafer is poor in this case. The only energy
`loss factor is the Stefan-Boltzmann radiation from the wafer
`to the chuck. Apart from a dissimilarity due to differences in
`heat capacitance of the wafer and the confinement ring, the
`behavior of wafer and wall will be similar. The temperature
`of the wafer will increase with time until it reaches a maxi-
`mum after which it will no longer change.
`Figure 5共A兲 shows the results of this experiment per-
`formed in discharges fed with CHF3 共40 sccm兲, C3F6 共40
`sccm兲, and C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/15 sccm兲 using 1400 W induc-
`tive power and 6 mTorr operating pressure. The fluorocarbon
`passive deposition rates are plotted as a function of process-
`ing time 共i.e., increasing substrate temperature兲. The initial
`deposition rates are similar to the deposition rates obtained
`with a clamped wafer when a helium backside pressure is
`applied; see Fig. 5共B兲. As the processing continues, and thus
`
`IPR2016-01376 Page 0003
`
`

`

`2102
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2102
`
`function of RF bias power is plotted in Fig. 5共B兲. It shows
`that C3F6 has a lower threshold RF bias power for etching
`than C3F6/H2 even though the passive deposition rates 共i.e., 0
`W RF bias power兲 are similar. It also shows that CHF3 has a
`higher threshold RF bias power than C3F6 , even though the
`passive deposition rate is significantly lower. From this com-
`parison it can be suggested that, in fluorocarbon etching, the
`RF bias power and the substrate temperature play a similar
`role, i.e., an energy source for enabling chemical reactions. It
`further shows that the transition from deposition to etching is
`strongly dependent on the feedgas chemistry. The reason
`why CHF3 and C3F6/H2 deposited fluorocarbon films require
`a higher threshold RF bias power or a higher substrate tem-
`perature is due to differences in chemical composition. The
`F/C ratios of the CHF3 and C3F6/H2 fluorocarbon films are
`lower than the F/C ratio of C3F6 fluorocarbon material due to
`the fluorine scavenging effect of hydrogen.12,14
`
`D. Temperature dependence of the gas phase
`chemistry
`
`The results from Sec. III C indicate that fluorocarbon spe-
`cies that are precursors for deposition on low temperature
`surfaces do not deposit on hot surfaces and remain in the
`plasma. The 共low temperature surface兲 deposition precursor
`density thus increases. This is consistent with results from
`Chinzei et al.,15 who reported that in a C4F8 ICP no polymer
`deposition occurs on surfaces at temperatures higher than
`200 °C. The density of CF and CF2 radicals, as measured by
`mass spectrometry, is one order of magnitude higher in a
`200 °C heated reactor in comparison to a reactor at 30 °C.
`Hikosaka et al.16 also reported mass spectrometric results
`showing that, as the temperature of their quartz wall in-
`creased, the CF3 radical density increased due to a reduced
`surface loss of these species. They additionally found an in-
`creased CO density due to enhanced etching of the quartz
`wall at higher temperatures and a decrease in F density
`which they ascribed to the enhanced F absorption on the
`quartz wall. Fluorine absorption by an aluminum wall has
`also been reported by Chinzei et al. In mass spectrometry
`measurements Maruyama et al.17 observed that for CF4 plas-
`mas an increase in the CFx radical density occurs as the wall
`temperature goes up. O’Neill and Singh9 who performed ul-
`traviolet 共UV兲-absorption spectroscopy in order to examine
`the CF2 radical density in a C2F6/CF4 plasma also reported a
`steady increase of this density as processing proceeds. They
`ascribed this effect to increasing polymer deposition on the
`wall, but also mentioned that the reactor wall temperature
`may play a significant role.
`Figure 7 shows optical emission spectra taken on a 1400
`W, 6 mTorr, 40 sccm C3F6 discharge in both a relatively cold
`共60 °C兲 and a hot 共300 °C兲 reactor. Significant intensity dif-
`ferences can be observed in the emission from various car-
`bon containing species. In Fig. 8 the peak intensities of CF2 ,
`C2 , CO and also those of atomic fluorine and oxygen are
`plotted as a function of reactor wall temperature. The inten-
`sities are normalized to their value in a hot reactor.
`It shows that the initial value, i.e., in a cold reactor, of the
`
`FIG. 6. 共A兲Simulated correlation between the ellipsometric angle ⌿ mea-
`sured on a crystalline silicon wafer and the real part of the refractive index
`of the silicon. 共B兲 Ellipsometric angle ⌿ measured as a function of time on
`a non-cooled crystalline silicon wafer in a C3F6 plasma at 1400 W inductive
`power and 6 mTorr operating pressure.
`
`the temperature of the substrate increases, the deposition rate
`decreases until a point in time where no net deposition takes
`place. Beyond this point the deposited fluorocarbon material
`will be removed until no fluorocarbon is left on the c-Si
`wafer. It thus shows that on a surface with a temperature
`above a certain value no net deposition will take place.
`The temperature rise of the non-cooled wafer is quantified
`by measuring the ellipsometric angle ⌿ on the hot, clean
`c-Si wafer after the C3F6 experiment from Fig. 5. The ⌿
`angle is strongly related to the real part of the refractive
`index, Re共n兲, of the silicon.13 The correlation between ⌿ and
`Re(n) is calculated using an ellipsometry simulation routine,
`and is plotted in Fig. 6共A兲. Using the temperature coefficient
`of Re共n兲 of silicon at 632.8 nm, ␦n/␦T⫽4.52⫻10⫺4 K⫺1, it
`can be calculated from the data in Fig. 6共B兲 that the tempera-
`ture of the wafer, after all fluorocarbon material has been
`removed, is at a value around 360 °C. This temperature cor-
`responds well with the stable wall temperature in a 1400 W,
`6 mTorr plasma; see Fig. 4.
`In Fig. 5 it is shown that the point where the net deposi-
`tion rate is zero occurs earlier in time 共i.e., at a lower tem-
`perature兲 for C3F6 共40 sccm兲 than for either CHF3 共40 sccm兲,
`which has a much lower initial deposition rate, or C3F6 共40
`sccm兲 with 15 sccm H2 added to it, which has a similar initial
`deposition rate.
`The results from this experiment allow an interesting
`analogy to be made between substrate temperature and RF
`bias power when etching fluorocarbon material deposited on
`a cooled wafer. The etch rate of fluorocarbon material 共de-
`posited at the same condition as etching is performed兲 as a
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 16, No. 4, Jul/Aug 1998
`
`IPR2016-01376 Page 0004
`
`

`

`2103
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2103
`
`FIG. 7. Comparison of optical emission spectra measured on a C3F6 plasma
`at 1400 W inductive power and 6 mTorr operating pressure. The left panel
`shows the spectrum measured in a cold 共60 °C兲 reactor and the right panel
`shows the spectrum measured in a hot 共300 °C兲 reactor.
`
`FIG. 9. Ion current density as a function of reactor wall temperature 共1400
`W inductive power, 6 mTorr operating pressure兲.
`
`intensity of carbon containing species is around 50%–60%
`of the final, hot reactor value. The fluorine intensity is ini-
`tially 10% higher than its final intensity. This indicates that
`the concentration ratio of carbon containing species, i.e.,
`deposition precursors, over atomic fluorine, i.e., etch precur-
`sor, increases as the reactor temperature increases.
`The increase in the CO intensity coincides with a decrease
`of the atomic oxygen signal. The CO formation can therefore
`be explained by an increased carbon density in the plasma
`reacting with atomic oxygen.
`At a constant pressure, the particle density decreases as
`the reactor temperature increases. Therefore, the electron
`mean free path and thus the electron temperature will in-
`crease. The constant emission intensity at
`temperatures
`higher than 200 °C may therefore correspond to a decreasing
`radical density. A change in the electron temperature, how-
`ever, should not influence the relative intensity of F emission
`
`FIG. 8. Emission intensities measured in a C3F6 plasma at 1400 W inductive
`power and 6 mTorr operating pressure. The intensities of the various species
`are normalized to their value in a hot reactor.
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`to CF2 and C2 , i.e., the gas phase F/C ratio, assuming ap-
`proximately similar excitation cross sections for these spe-
`cies.
`
`E. Temperature dependence of the ion current
`density
`
`The ion current density has been measured as a function
`of reactor wall temperature in CHF3 , C3F6 , and C3F6/H2
`discharges; see Fig. 9. The ion current density decreases as
`the wall temperature increases. The ion density may decrease
`more significantly as a function of reactor wall temperature
`than the ion current density does, assuming that the electron
`temperature increases. A higher electron temperature leads to
`an increase in the ion acoustic velocity, which results in a
`higher ion current density for a given ion density.
`The decrease in the ion density can partially be explained
`by the fact that the overall particle density goes down as the
`temperature of the reactor walls increases.
`
`F. Temperature dependence of plasma-surface
`interactions
`1.Fluorocarbondeposition
`The results previously presented suggest a time depen-
`dence of the fluorocarbon deposition on cold surfaces, such
`as cooled substrates. Figure 10 shows the passive fluorocar-
`bon deposition measured as a function of reactor wall tem-
`perature in a C3F6 共40 sccm兲 and C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/12 sccm兲
`plasma at 1400 W inductive power and 6 mTorr operating
`pressure. The deposition rate shows a maximum as a func-
`tion of wall temperature. This can be explained as follows.
`Initially passive deposition will take place on the walls at
`the same rate as on the wafer. As the walls heat up, the
`passive deposition rate on the walls will decrease and ulti-
`mately fluorocarbon removal will occur. The deposition pre-
`cursor density in the gas phase increases at the same time,
`raising the passive deposition on the cooled wafer. After all
`the fluorocarbon material has been removed from the walls,
`the deposition precursor density in the gas phase and thus the
`
`IPR2016-01376 Page 0005
`
`

`

`2104
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2104
`
`FIG. 10. 共A兲 Threshold RF bias power for etching, 共B兲 passive fluorocarbon
`deposition rate, and 共C兲 the fluorocarbon refractive index as a function of
`reactor wall temperature in a C3F6 共40 sccm兲 and a C3F6 /H2 共40 sccm/12
`sccm兲 plasma at 1400 W inductive power and 6 mTorr operating pressure.
`
`passive deposition rate at the wafer will decrease again 共but
`still be higher than the initial rate兲. This is consistent with
`results reported by Tsukada et al.,18 who reported that poly-
`mer deposition on the coldest surface is faster than on other
`surfaces. The reason that the maximum in the deposition rate
`occurs at a higher temperature in C3F6/H2 than in C3F6 is
`consistent with the data in Fig. 5, which show that a higher
`temperature is needed to remove fluorocarbon deposited in
`C3F6/H2 .
`The refractive index of the deposited fluorocarbon mate-
`rial shown in Fig. 10 has been shown to be inversely propor-
`tional to the F/C ratio.1 The maximum in deposition rate
`coincides with a maximum in the refractive index. Figure 10
`also shows the temperature dependence of the threshold RF
`bias power, defined as the RF bias power at which net fluo-
`rocarbon deposition is prevented by ion bombardment, but
`no net substrate etching occurs. The data show that the etch-
`ing of the fluorocarbon material is increasingly difficult as
`the fluorocarbon deposition rate increases and as the F/C
`ratio decreases. A maximum in the RF threshold bias power
`is observed at the same temperature as the maximum in the
`deposition rate and refractive index occurs.
`
`2.Oxideetching
`Figure 11共A兲 shows the oxide etch rates monitored for
`longer time periods than in Fig. 2 for C3F6/H2 discharges at
`1400 W inductive power, 6 mTorr operating pressure at
`⫺100 V self-bias voltage, and different H2 additions. In the
`temperature regime up to 200 °C, the oxide etch rate is fairly
`temperature independent.
`It
`is also independent of
`the
`feedgas chemistry. The slight decrease in the etch rate can be
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 16, No. 4, Jul/Aug 1998
`
`FIG. 11. 共A兲 Oxide etch rates and 共B兲 nitride etch rates as functions of wall
`temperature measured in C3F6 共40 sccm兲, C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/12 sccm兲, and
`C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/15 sccm兲 discharges at 1400 W inductive power and 6
`mTorr operating pressure at a RF bias power of 200 W 共i.e., ⫺100 V
`self-bias兲.
`
`explained by the decreasing ion current density since the
`oxide etch mechanism has been shown to be mainly ion
`driven.6,19 For higher temperatures a strong dependence on
`feedgas chemistry is observed, which cannot be explained by
`direct reactive ion etching of the oxide. When 15 sccm of
`H2 is added to 40 sccm of C3F6 , the etch process goes into a
`deposition mode at a temperature of around 250 °C. For a
`H2 addition of 12–40 sccm C3F6 the etch rate displays a
`minimum. For pure C3F6 , the oxide etch rate is temperature
`independent.
`The minimum in the etch rate at 12 sccm H2 addition is
`consistent with the maximum in the passive deposition rate
`as a function of temperature. It is also consistent with the
`maximum in the fluorocarbon refractive index 共minimum in
`F/C ratio兲. The minimum in the etch rate occurs also at 15
`sccm H2 addition, but then as a maximum in the deposition
`rate 共under biased conditions兲.
`The fact that for pure C3F6 no minimum in the oxide etch
`rate is seen, although there is a maximum in the passive
`deposition rate, indicates that the oxide etch mechanism is
`more complicated than just reactive ion sputtering.
`An explanation for this behavior can be found by observ-
`ing that the oxide etch rate as a function of self-bias voltage
`exhibits: 共1兲 fluorocarbon deposition, 共2兲 fluorocarbon sup-
`pression, and 共3兲 oxide sputtering.6,12,14 In the fluorocarbon
`deposition regime net fluorocarbon deposition takes place.
`As the RF bias power is increased and a larger self-bias
`
`IPR2016-01376 Page 0006
`
`

`

`2105
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2105
`
`voltage develops, the fluorocarbon suppression regime is en-
`tered and oxide etching occurs. The sputtering mechanism is
`however suppressed by the presence of a relatively thick
`steady-state fluorocarbon film. As the RF bias power is fur-
`ther increased, the oxide surface becomes free of fluorocar-
`bon material and chemical sputtering can occur. The etch
`rate is then proportional to the square root of the ion energy.
`The dependence of the oxide etch rate on RF bias was
`examined for different fluorocarbon feedgas chemistries. The
`passive deposition rate is similar for both C3F6 and C3F6/H2 ,
`but the RF bias threshold power for etching and the RF
`power at which the sputtering regime is reached are higher
`for C3F6/H2 . This is consistent with the etching of fluorocar-
`bon material, as shown in Fig. 5. For sufficiently high RF
`bias powers the oxide etch rates in C3F6 and C3F6/H2 are
`similar. At that point the sputtering regime is reached and the
`etching is mainly dependent on the ion flux to the surface.
`Figure 9 showed that the ion current densities for C3F6 and
`C3F6/H2 are fairly similar.
`In Fig. 10 the temperature dependence of the RF threshold
`power required to induce oxide etching in a C3F6 共40 sccm兲
`and a C3F6/H2 共40 sccm/12 sccm兲 discharge is shown. It
`shows a maximum, similar to the fluorocarbon deposition
`rate. This can be understood since at the etch threshold point
`the deposition and etching processes balance each other. If
`the deposition rate increases, one needs to compensate for
`this by increasing the bias. The opposite holds for a decrease
`in the threshold value.
`
`3.Nitrideandsiliconetching
`Figure 11共B兲 shows the nitride etch rate as a function of
`reactor wall temperature for C3F6/H2 discharges at 1400 W
`inductive power, 6 mTorr operating pressure at ⫺100 V self-
`bias voltage, and different H2 additions. Figure 11共B兲 is con-
`sistent with Fig. 2. It shows that the nitride etch rate depen-
`dence on the reactor wall temperature is different from the
`oxide etch rate dependence. This can be explained by taking
`in account results obtained when nitride samples were etched
`as function of the RF bias power for C3F6 and C3F6/H2 . For
`RF bias powers where oxide was being etched by a sputter-
`ing mechanism, the nitride etching was suppressed, and the
`degree of suppression depended strongly on the feedgas
`chemistry. Similar results were obtained for silicon sub-
`strates with the difference that these were suppressed to an
`even lower level.12,14,20
`
`4.Model
`
`In Figure 12 all the above information is combined. It
`shows schematically the influence of increasing wall tem-
`perature on the oxide etch rate as a function of self-bias
`voltage in both the C3F6 and the C3F6/H2 cases. As the pas-
`sive deposition rate increases, the RF bias threshold shifts to
`a higher value. For the C3F6 case etching at 100 V self-bias
`共⫽200 W RF bias power兲 still occurs through the mechanism
`of oxide sputtering. No temperature dependence can there-
`fore be observed; see Fig. 12共A兲. For C3F6/H2 , however,
`
`JVST A - Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
`
`FIG. 12. Schematic view of the oxide and nitride etch characteristics for
`various wall temperatures for 共A兲 C3F6 processing and 共B兲 C3F6 /H2 pro-
`cessing. The thick solid curves represent the oxide etching, and the dotted
`lines the nitride etching. The sputtering curve 共thin solid line兲 is also in-
`cluded.
`
`etching has shifted into the fluorocarbon suppression regime,
`resulting in a temperature dependent etch behavior; see Fig.
`12共B兲.
`Joubert et al.21 used oxide etch rate versus self-bias volt-
`age curves similar to the ones presented in Fig. 12 in order to
`explain reactive ion etching 共RIE兲 lag effects. Since differ-
`ential charging at the bottom of etched features occurs, ions
`entering the feature are retarded, resulting in a decreased etch
`yield or even deposition. It is expected that the reactor wall
`temperature effect will enhance the RIE lag effect signifi-
`cantly.
`The wall temperature dependence of the nitride etch rate
`can also be explained using the information presented above.
`Figure 12 also schematically shows the effect of increasing
`wall temperature for both C3F6 and C3F6/H2 on the nitride
`etch rate. As the passive deposition rate increases, the RF
`bias threshold shifts to a higher value, and the etch rate val-
`ues at a certain self-bias voltage are being suppressed. This is
`the case for both C3F6 , Fig. 12共A兲, and C3F6/H2 etching, Fig.
`12共B兲, at 100 V self-bias 共⫽200 W RF bias power兲, resulting
`in a temperature dependent etch behavior. The same expla-
`nation holds for the silicon etching data.
`It can thus be suggested that the increased reactor wall
`temperature results in a more efficient suppression of the
`substrate etch rate due to enhanced fluorocarbon deposition
`which leads to a thicker steady-state fluorocarbon film. The
`
`IPR2016-01376 Page 0007
`
`

`

`2106
`
`Schaepkens etal.: Influence of reactor wall conditions
`
`2106
`
`FIG. 13. The silicon etch rate and the thickness of the steady-state fluoro-
`carbon film measured as a function of reactor wall temperature. As the film
`thickness increases, the silicon etch rate decreases 共1400 W, 6 mTorr, ⫺100
`V self-bias兲.
`
`suggested mechanism is supported by the data in Fig. 13,
`which show the silicon etch rate and the steady-state fluoro-
`carbon film thickness 共determined by ellipsometry兲 as a
`function of reactor wall temperature in a C3F6/H2 plasma at
`1400 W inductive power and 6 mTorr operating pressure.
`The silicon etch rate decreases as the fluorocarbon film thick-
`ness increases until the process moves from an etching mode
`into a deposition mode. This is consistent with results from
`other studies that report that the etch rate of a substrate is
`inversely
`proportional
`to
`the
`fluorocarbon
`film
`thickness.12,14,20
`
`G. Temperature dependence of process uniformity
`
`In the above it has been shown that the fluorocarbon
`deposition rate is a key parameter in the selective oxide etch-
`ing process. The temperature dependence of the process uni-
`formity is now investigated by measuring the fluorocarbon
`deposition rate as a function of position on the wafer 共using
`ex situ spatially resolved ellipsometry兲. In Fig. 14 the fluo-
`rocarbon deposition rate profile obtained in a C3F6/H2 共40
`sccm/15 sccm兲 discharge at 1400 W inductive power and 6
`mTorr operating pressure in a reactor with a wall tempera-
`ture of 100 °C is compared to the profile obtained at 300 °C.
`The fluorocarbon deposition rate in the 300 ° C

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket