throbber
Proc.NatL Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 79, pp. 4020~4024, July 1982
`Biochemistry
`
`Genes encoding Escherichia" coli aspartate transcarbamoylase:
`The pyrB-pyrl operon
`(transcriptional regulation/cloning pyrB and pyrl genes/map position of gene encoding regulatory chains/intercistronic region)
`C. DAVID PAUZA*, MICHAEL J. KARELS, MARC NAVRE, AND H. K. SCHACHMANt
`Department of Molecular Biology and Virus Laboratory, Wendell M. Stanley Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
`
`Contributed by Howard K. Schachman, Apri/9, 1982
`
`In both Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi(cid:173)
`ABSTRACT
`murium there is approximately balanced synthesis of the six cat(cid:173)
`alytic and six regulatory polypeptide chains of the regulatory en"
`zyme aspartate transcarbamoylase (carbamoylphosphate:L-as(cid:173)
`partate carbamoyltransferase, EC 2.1.3.2). This control is achieved
`by the contiguous pyrB and·pyrl genes, which encode the catalytic
`and regulatory chains, respectively. Evidence for this single tran(cid:173)
`scriptional unit was obtained by a study of various deletion mu(cid:173)
`tations and from the DNA sequence of the intercistronic region
`between pyrBand pyrl. One pyrB deletion, pyrB748, produced
`a normal level of regulatory chains even though.it removed a sub(cid:173)
`stantial portion of the pyrB gene. Another deletion, pyrB740,
`shares a similar terminus at one end within pyrB, but the promoter
`region is removed.· ln·this deletion mutation, there is no produc(cid:173)
`tion of the regulatory polypeptide, indicating that a single region
`adjacent to pyrB·controls transcription of pyrl as well. Molecular
`cloning and subsequent DNA analysis demonstrated that the pyrB
`and pyrl genes are contiguous with pyrl as the distal gene in the
`operon. The cistrons are separated by a IS-nucleotide untrans(cid:173)
`lated region containing a sequence capable of interacting with the
`16S ribosomal RNA and allowing translation of the pyrl cistron.
`
`It has been known for many years that the allosteric enzyme
`aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase; aspartate carbamoyl(cid:173)
`transferase; carbamoylphosphate:L-aspartate carbamoyltrans(cid:173)
`ferase; EC 2.1.3.2) from Escherichia coli is an oligomer com•
`posed of six catalytic (c) and six regulatory (r) polypeptide chains
`(1-6). Moreover, there is approximately balanced biosynthesis
`of the chains in both E . coli (7) and Salmonella typhimurium
`(8). These observations led to the suggestion that the structural
`genes for the c and r chains (pyrB and pyrl, respectively) are
`organized as an operon (8) and that biosynthesis invol~es a
`polycistronic messenger RNA (7). However, precise knowledge
`of the location of the pyrl gene and definitive evidence that both
`genes are subject to the same transcriptional control have not
`been available.
`ATCase of both E. coli and S. typhimurium is composed of
`two trimeric catalytic (C) subunits and three dimeric regulatory
`(R)subunits (1~6, 9, 10). Isolated C trimers of molecular weight
`100,000 are catalytically active but insensitive to· the feedback
`inhibitor, CTP, and the activator, ATP (1), whereas the freeR
`dimers of molecular weight 34,000 are devoid of catalytic ac(cid:173)
`tivity but still bind both CTP and ATP with high affinity (1).
`When C and R subunits are mixed, reconstituted ATCase of
`molecular weight 300,000 is formed in high yield, and the com(cid:173)
`plex exhibits the allosteric properties of native ATCase (1).
`Several lines of evidence indicate that the pyrl gene is in
`close proximity to the pyrB gene. Single deletions in S. typhi(cid:173)
`murium eliminate production of both c and r polypeptide chains
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertise·
`ment" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. § 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`(8). In addition, specialized A phages capable of transducing the
`pyrB gene also encode the r chain (11), but the distance between
`pyrB and pyrl is uncertain. Although the genes for the biosyn(cid:173)
`thetic pathway (pyrB, pyrC, pyrD, pyrE, and pyr:F) respond
`in a coordinate manner to uracil starvation (12), they map at
`different positions (13). The increase in ATCase activity, re(cid:173)
`flecting the elevated and balanced expression of pyrB and pyrl,
`is at least 10-fold greater than that of the other enzymes (12, 14).
`Support for the suggestion that pyrB and pyr.l are part of the
`same transcription unit stems from two independent sets of
`experiments. Perbal and Herve (7) determined the kinetics of
`incorporation of radioactively labeled amino acids into the c and
`r chains during and immediately after uracil starvation, and on
`the basis of the results they proposed that synthesis of both
`types of polypeptide chains was directed by a polycistronic
`messenger RNA in E. coli. Further evidence for an operon
`structure was provided by Syvanen and Roth (8) in their dem(cid:173)
`onstration of the polarity of pyrB chain-terminating mutations
`on the synthesis of r chains in S . typhimurium.
`In order to eliminate uncertainty regarding the organization
`of the pyrB and pyrl genes and the control of their expression,
`we have analyzed the effect of pyrB deletion mutations on the
`synthesis of the r polypeptide chains. These studies have shown
`that pyrl is subject to the same transcriptional regulation as
`pyrB even in the absence of the pyrB product. In addition, we
`have determined the position of the pyrl gene by DNA se(cid:173)
`quence analysis of the intercistronic region between pyrB and
`pyrt These results establish that the contiguous pyrB and pyrl
`genes constitute a single transcriptional unit encoding the c and
`r chains of E. coli ATCase.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Bacterial Strains and Their Construction. All S . t!Jphimu(cid:173)
`rium strains listed in Table 1 are derivatives of LT2 except
`TR3200, which was derived from LTI. The pyrH700 mutation
`results in a partially defective UMP kinase; as a consequence
`the levels of UDP and UTP are reduced, resulting in greatly
`increased production ofATCase (9, 15-17). Mutation pyrB655
`is a deletion that removes all of pyrB (8). The F393 episome is
`derived from F128 (F' pro lac) of E. coli K-12 and contains the
`E. coli pyrB (17). Media, transductional methods, and conju(cid:173)
`gational transfers were described earlier (17). High-titer phage
`P22lysates for mapping experiments were concentrated 10-fold
`to yield titers of about IOn plaque-forming units/ml; they were
`stored in T-2 buffer (18).
`
`Abbreviations: ATCase, aspartate transcarbamoylase; c, catalytic poly(cid:173)
`peptide chain; r, regulatory polypeptide chain; C, catalytic subunit; R,
`regulatory subunit; Pyr+,Jyrimidine-independent; kb, kilobase.
`*Present address: Medic Research Council Laboratory of Molecular
`Biology, Cambridge, England:
`t To whom .reprint requests should be addressed.
`
`4020
`
`Merck Ex. 1050, pg 1314
`
`

`
`Biochemistry: Pauza et al
`
`Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79 (1982)
`
`4021
`
`Genotype
`
`Table 1. Bacterial strains
`Strain
`.8. typhimurium
`HS2230 argl2002 fol-101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700
`HS2231 arg/2002 fol-101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700/
`F393tac• pro• argF280 (P22 pyrB•)
`HS2255 argl2002 fol,101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700/
`F393tac• pro• argF282::Tn10 (P22 pyrB740)
`HS2256 argl2002 fol-101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700/
`F393lac+ pro• argF282::Tn10 (P22pyrB•)
`HS2273 argl2002 fol-101leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700/
`F393tac• pro• argF282::Tn10 (P22 pyrB748)
`HS2278 argl2002 fol-101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700/
`F393lac+ pro• (1>22 pyrB754)
`fol-101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655 pyrH700/
`F393tac• pro• argF282::Tn10 (P22 pyrB748)
`fol-101 leuD798 proAB47 pyrB655/
`F393 lac• pro• argF282::TnlO (P22 pyrB748)
`TR3200* amtA1 proAB47 pyrB655 trp-130
`
`HS2306
`
`HS2307
`
`E. coli
`AT2535t pyrB59, argH2, thi-1, his-1,purF1, mtl-2, xyl-7, malA1,
`ara-13, lacY1 or lacZ9, rps-18, 9 or 14, ton.A2 or ton-
`14, tsx-23 or tsx-25, Ar, A-, supE44
`* Kindly provided by J. R. Roth.
`t Obtained from the E. coli·Genetic Stock Center (New Haven, CT).
`
`Isolation and Mapping of Deletion Mutants. Deletion mu(cid:173)
`tants HS2255 (pyrB740), HS2273 (pyrB748), and HS2278
`(pyrB754) are spontaneous derivatives of HS2256 obtained by
`selecting for pyrB mutants as suppressors of arginine auxotro(cid:173)
`phy (17). These deletion mutants are completely auxotropic for
`pyrimidines. Mapping was performed by transductional crosses
`using high-titer P22 stocks grown on point mutants and select(cid:173)
`ing for the ability of the deletion mutants to form pyrimidine(cid:173)
`independent (Pyr+) transductants in spot tests on selective me(cid:173)
`dia. Endpoints were confirmed by crosses using 100-200 11-l of
`high-titer P22 stocks and 100 11-l of recipient cells that had been
`concentrated 10-fold after overnight growth in nutrient broth
`supplemented with a 2% vol of E medium (at 50 times the nor(cid:173)
`mal concentration). The crosses were scored after 48 hr at 37"C.
`In crosses in which recombination was possible at least 100 col(cid:173)
`onies resulted, whereas negative results were indicated by a
`complete absence of Pyr+ transductants.
`Preparation of Cell Extracts. Bacteria for assays of R subunit
`were grown to late logarithmic phase in 25-ml cultures of E
`medium supplemented with 0.25% glucose, uracil at 20 WU
`ml, and required amino acids at 100 1£g/ml. Extracts were pre(cid:173)
`pared as described by Syvanen and Roth (8). Protein concen(cid:173)
`trations in the extracts were 0.8-1.5 mg/ml.
`Preparation of Radioactively Labeled C Subunit. 1251-La(cid:173)
`beled C subunit was prepared by the method of Syvanen et aL
`(19}, using 0.5 mCi (1 Ci = 3. 7 X 1010 becquerels) of Na125I
`(Amersham) and 40 11-g of purified C subunit from E. coli ATC(cid:173)
`ase. The specific activity of the labeled protein was 4.2 x 106
`cpm/1£g.
`Assay for R Subunit in Cell Extracts. The amount of R sub(cid:173)
`unit in the extracts was measured by the procedure (assay II)
`of Syvanen and Roth (8). Cell extracts (50 11-l) were treated with
`0.2&..~tmol of neohydrin (K & K) to dissociate any ATCase into
`free R and C subunits (1). After 2 min the bisubstrate analog
`N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate was added to yield a concen(cid:173)
`tration of 20 1£M, followed by the addition of 1.5 ~£mol of 2-
`mercaptoethanol and 125I-labeled C subunit. The amount of
`125I-labeled C subunit was varied between 2 and 8 11-g (1.5 X
`lOS cpm per tube), depending upon the amount of R subunit
`
`found to be present in the extracts in preliminary experiments.
`This procedure was followed in order to obtain the maximal
`sensitivity consistent with a broad range of detection. The re(cid:173)
`constitution of ATCase was achieved by incubating the mixtures
`of subunits for 30 min at 30°C. In all experiments the labeled
`C subunit was in excess of any unlabeled C subunit in the ex(cid:173)
`tracts, and not more than 50% of the 125I-labeled subunit was
`converted to radioactively labeled ATCase. Unlabeled ATCase
`and C subunit were added as markers and the samples were
`subjected to electrophoresis in 5-cm polyacrylamide gels (5%).
`After electrophoresis the gels were stained and sliced, and the
`distribution of radioactivity in ATCase and C subunit was
`determined.
`Plasmid Construction. Restriction endonucleases were ob(cid:173)
`tained from New England BioLabs and used according to the
`supplier's specifications. The bacterial strain AD llm5, carrying
`the ,\specialized transducing phage ykl4m5 (.\d pyrB argl valS)
`as a prophage (20) was kindly provided by Aki Kikuchi. Bac(cid:173)
`teriophage DNA was isolated by the procedure ofWu et al (21).
`Plasmid DNA was isolated by the alkaline-NaDodS04 extrac(cid:173)
`tion method ofBirnboim and Doly (22), and the DNA was pu(cid:173)
`rified further by centrifugation in a CsCl/ ethidium bromide
`gradient (23).
`A molecular recombinant plasmid containing the pyrB gene
`was constructed by digestion of ykl4m5 and pBR322 (24) DNA
`with the restriction endonucleases Pst I and EcoRI and sub(cid:173)
`sequent ligation of the fragments with phage T4 DNA ligase.
`Plasmids were used to transform strain AT2535 (carrying the
`pyrB59 allele) made competent by treatment with CaC12 (25).
`The resulting transformants were selected as Pyr + tetracycline(cid:173)
`resistant colonies. One isolate was selected and the 7. 4-kilobase
`(kb) plasmid, pDP7, was purified and analyzed by restriction
`endonuclease digestion and electrophoresis in 0. 7% agarose
`gels.
`The size of the DNA fragment containing the pyrB gene was
`reduced by digesting plasmid pDP7 with EcoRI and treating
`the linear DNA with Bal31 double-stranded exonuclease (26)
`for 30 min at 30°C. Incubation of the resulting DNA overnight
`with T4 DNA ligase yielded plasmid pDP8, which was used to
`transform AT2535 cells, selecting for pyrimidine prototrophy.
`Isolates were screened to ensure that they were tetracycline
`sensitive because exonucleolytic digestion of pDP7 from the
`EcoRI site should result in the loss of tetracycline resistance
`(27). The ability of plasmid pDP8 to encode both c and r poly(cid:173)
`peptides was tested as follows: A derivative ofTR3200 (carrying
`the pyrB655 deletion) containing pDP8 was constructed. Cel(cid:173)
`lular extracts were prepared and subjected to electrophoresis
`in 5% polyacrylamide gels. The mobilities of the enzymically
`active proteins were determined by using the activity stain de(cid:173)
`scribed by Bothwell (28). As little. as 1 ng of active protein (ATC(cid:173)
`ase or G subunit) can be detected readily by this procedure.
`Sequence Determination. A DNA fragment approximately
`650 base pairs in length was derived by digestion of pDP8 with
`the restriction endonuclease Msp I (Fig. 1) and was labeled at
`the 5' termini with [ -y-32P]ATP (Amersham, >5,000 Ci/mmol)
`and polynucleotide kinase (P-L Biochemicals). The DNA
`strands were separated according to the procedure of Maxam
`and Gilbert (29). In other experiments the plasmid was digested
`with Bgl II, and the 3' ends were labeled with the large frag(cid:173)
`ment of DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim) and a-
`32P-labeled deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (Amersham,
`>3,000 Ci{mmol) followed by digestion with Pvu II. There(cid:173)
`sulting 950-base-pair fragment was isolated by polyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis (29). Nucleotide sequences of the Bgl II/
`Pvu II fragment and both strands of the Msp I ·fragment were
`
`Merck Ex. 1050, pg 1315
`
`

`
`4022
`
`Biochemistry: Pauza et al
`
`Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79 (1982)
`
`Pst I
`
`pyrB
`
`P~ull
`
`0.5 kb
`
`t
`
`pyr/
`
`II
`
`Jnct
`
`FIG. 1. Structure of region of plasmid pDP8 containing pyrB and
`pyrl. The plasmid was derived from pDP7 (containing pyrB and pyrl
`on an EcoRI/Pst I fragment from the .\ specialized transducing phage
`yk14m5) by linearization of the molecule by EcoRI digestion, treat(cid:173)
`ment with Bal 31 double-stranded uonuclease, and ligation with T4
`DNA ligase. Only the segment containingpyrB and pyrl is shown. The
`junction with pBR322 after Bal31 digestion is indicated by Jnct, and
`the restriction sites utilized to produce fragments for nucleotide se(cid:173)
`quence determinations are shown. Arrows represent the sites cleaved
`by Msp I to yield the fragment containing 650 base pain. The fragment
`produced by Bgl IT/Pvu IT contained 950 base pairs.
`
`determined by the method of Maxam ·and Gilbert (29) with the
`modifications described by Smith and Calvo (30).
`
`RESULTS
`Mapping of Deletion Mutations. Twenty-four pyrB deletion
`mutants have been isolated as part of the construction of a de- .
`tailed recombination map of the pyrB locus; only three are de(cid:173)
`scribed here. These deletions, pyrB740, pyrB748, and.pyrB754,
`were mapped by transductional crosses with point mutations
`whose map positions had been determined independently (31)
`and are shown in Fig. 2; In this map, pyrB554 is the most pro.
`mater-proximal point mutation that has been mapped (31).
`Deletions pyrB740 and pyrB748 fail to recombine with point.
`mutations from pyrB554 through pyrB717. However these two
`deletions recombine with all point mutations from pyrB727
`through the end of pyrB. A pyrB754 strain is able to form Pyr+
`transductants when donors carry point mutations from pyrB554
`through pyrB731, but pyrB754 ·does not recombine with
`pyrB713 or pyrB730. These re!mlts are summarized by the map·
`shown in Fig. 2.
`The deletion pyrB754 extends at least to argF on the F393
`episome because it has simultaneously become Pyr- and tet(cid:173)
`racycline sensitive. (the transposon TnlO in argF of the parent
`strain confers tetracycline resistance). Because of the deletion,
`argF has become 100% linked with pyrB by P22-mediated
`transduction (342 of 342 Pyr+ transductants had become argi(cid:173)
`nine independent), as contrasted with the original cotransduc(cid:173)
`tion frequency of 7% (for pyrB554, only 24 of 342 Pyr+ trans-
`
`<t on on
`
`pyrB
`
`740
`748
`
`pyri
`
`754
`
`FIG. 2. Map of pyrB.deletions. Relevant point mutations from the
`fine structure recombination map of the pyrB gene obtained by three(cid:173)
`factor crosses (31) are presented at the top. Shown below are the three
`partial deletions of pyrB utilized ·in this. work; endpoints are def"med
`by the nearest point mutations. Both pyrB740 and pyrB748 have their
`right endpoints between pyrB717 and pyrB727~ Because pyrB727 re(cid:173)
`combines with pyrB748 at. a lower frequency than with pyrB740, the
`end of deletion pyrB748 is probably closer to pyrB727 than is the end(cid:173)
`point of pyrB740. Deletions pyrB740 and pyrB748 fail to recombine
`with pyrB554, the most promoter-proximal point mutation that has
`been mapped. Deletion pyrB740 continues leftward through the pro(cid:173)
`moter for pyrB, whereas deletion pyrB748 does not (see text). Point
`mutation pyrB231 has been shown to correspond to amino acid residue
`125 in the c polypeptide chain (32). Mutation pyrB754 deletes the car(cid:173)
`boxyl-terminal coding region of pyrB, all of pyrl, and the flanking re(cid:173)
`gion at least to argF. Transcription is from left to right.
`
`Table 2. Production of R subunit in various strains
`
`R
`subunit,•
`Relevant genotype
`Strain
`p.g/mg
`HS2230
`<0.2
`argl2002 pyrB655 pyrH700
`argl2002 pyrB655 pyrH700 /F' pyrB+
`HS2231
`12.9
`HS2255
`<0.2
`argl2002 pyrB655 pyrH700/F' pyrB740
`HS2273
`argl2002 pyrB655 pyrH700/F' pyrB748
`11.7
`HS2278
`<0.2
`argl2002 pyrB655 pyrH700/F' pyrB754
`7.5
`HS2306
`pyrB655 pyrH700/F' pyrB748 ·
`<0.2
`HS2307
`pyrB655/F' pyrB748
`• Amounts Qf R subunit per mg of cell protein in the cell extracts were
`determined by the procedure of Syvanen and Roth (8). Amounts less
`than 0.2 p.g/mg were below the level of detection.
`
`ductants were arginine independent). These results confirm the
`extent of the deletion pyrB754.
`Production of R Subunit in pyrB Deletion Strains. The dif(cid:173)
`ferent strains containing deletions in pyrB were assayed for the
`productionofRsubunit(asdescribedinMaterialsandMethods)
`in order to determine which regions were necessary for pyrl
`expression. Table 2 summarizes the results of these assays in
`terms of the amount of R subunit- in crude .extracts.
`HS2230, carrying only the deletion pyrB655, produced no
`detectable R subunit, as expected from the results of Syvanen
`and Roth (8). In contrast, HS2231, with a normal pyrB gene on
`the episome, produced a large amount of R subunit-because of
`the effect of the pyrH700 mutation (17). Deletions pyrB7 40 and
`pyrB754 eliminated the production of R subunit.* However,
`a large quantity of R subunit was produced in HS2273, which
`carries the deletion pyrB748. This mutation does not interfere
`with the normal control ofR subunit synthesis, as shown by the
`results with HS2307. In this pyrH+ derivative virtually no R
`subunit is detectable. The effect of pyrH700 on the production
`of R subunit in the absence of the pyrB product is consistent
`with the increase observed in ATCase production in pyrB+
`strains caused by pyrH700 (17). The overproduction of R sub(cid:173)
`unit in HS2273 ·is due primarily to the pyrH700 allele rather
`than argl2002, as shown by the comparison of the amounts of
`R subunit in the extracts of HS2306 and HS2307:
`Structure of pDP8. The plasmid pDP8 was mapped by diges(cid:173)
`tion with the Pst I, Bgl II, and Pvu II restriction endonucleases.
`The extent of the Bal 31-induced deletion was estimated by
`digestion with Hin£1 and Taq I, placing the endpoint between
`nucleotides 851 and 1,005 of pBR322 (33). Nucleotide sequence
`determinations (34) show the junction to be at nucleotide 874
`of the pBR322 sequence .(27). The total size· of the deletion. is
`2 kb, indicating that pDP8 is 5.4 kb. Polyacrylamide gel elec(cid:173)
`trophoresis of cellular extracts from a TR3200 derivative con(cid:173)
`taining pDP8 revealed a single band when the gels were stained
`for enzyme activity (ref. 28; see Materials and Methods). The
`protein responsible for the activity had the electrophoretic mo.
`bility of native ATCase rather than free C subunit. Thus the
`ability of pDP8 to direct the synthesis of intact ATCase in the
`TR3200 background was the result of the presence of both pyrB
`and pyrl genes in the plasmid.
`Sequence of the Intercistronic Region. The nucleotide se(cid:173)
`quence of parts of the pyrB and pyrl structural genes and the
`intercistronic region between them is shown in Fig. 3. Begin(cid:173)
`ning with the initiation trinucleotide; ATG, the predicted se-
`* Similar results were obtained for nine additioaal deletions. Five dele(cid:173)
`tions extend in the same direction as pyrB740 with right endpoints
`at five widely separated locations in pyrB. The other four delete dif(cid:173)
`ferent amounts of the promoter-distal end of pyrB.
`
`Merck Ex. 1050, pg 1316
`
`

`
`Biochemistry: Pauza et al
`
`Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA 79 (1982)
`
`4023
`
`AI a-Leu-Val- Leu-Asn-Arg-Asp-Leu-Vai-Leu-Stop
`
`Met-Thr-His- Asp-An-Lys-Leu-GI n-Val
`
`GCA-tTG-GTT-CTG-AAT-CGC-GAT-CTG-GTA-CTG-TAAGGGGAAATAGAGATG-ACA-CAC-GAT-AAT-AAA-TTG-CAG-GTT
`
`FIG. 3. Partial nucleotide sequence of the 650-base DNA fragment containing parts of pyrB and pyrl and the intercistronic region. The sequence
`reads from the 5' direction on the left to the 3' direction on the right. Amino acids shown above the DNA sequence represent the carboxyl-terminal
`region of the c chain and the amino-terminal region of the r chain.
`
`quence of amino acids (shown above the DNA sequence in the
`5' -to-3' direction) is identical to the amino terminus of the r
`polypeptide chain determined by Weber (2). The nucleotide
`sequence preceding the termination codon, TAA, is thought to
`constitute the coding region for the carboxyl terminus of the c
`polypeptide chains for the following reasons: First, the terminal
`amino acid corresponding to the trinucleotide CTG is leucine,
`which has been identified as the carboxyl-terminal amino acid
`in the c chains {2). Second, the 650-base-pair Msp I fragment
`contains a nucleotide region encoding the peptide Arg-Leu(cid:173)
`Asp-Pro-Ser-Glu-Tyr-Ala-Asn-Val-Lys, described by Landfear
`et aL {35) as the amino acid residues from positions 207 to 217
`in the c chains. This nucleotide sequence is in the same reading
`frame 192 base pairs from the carboxyl terminus in Fig. 3. Third,
`a DNA fragment adjacent to the Msp I fragment described here
`has a nucleotide sequence {34) that would encode a peptide
`identical to the 38 amino acid polypeptide whose sequence was
`determined by Wall and Schachman {32).
`Although the complete nucleotide sequence of the pyrB gene
`and the amino acid sequence of the c chains are not as yet avail(cid:173)
`able, the evidence cited here is sufficient to warrant the con(cid:173)
`clusion that the nucleotide sequence in Fig. 3 includes regions
`of the pyrB and pyrl structural genes as well as the intercistronic
`region.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Studies aimed at demonstrating an operon encoding the c and
`r chains of ATCase (7, 8) have been hindered by the lack of direct
`information concerning the linkage of the pyrB and pyrl genes
`and the inability to isolate regulatory mutants of the cis-domi(cid:173)
`nant type. From a study of various deletion mutations we have
`established that a region genetically linked to pyrB regulates
`the production of both c and r polypeptide chains in a single
`transcriptional unit. Moreover, the structural organization of
`the pyrB and pyrl genes was determined by analysis of the DNA
`sequence of the intercistronic region.
`The pyrB748 mutation, as seen in Fig. 2, removes a large
`portion of the pyrB gene. Nonetheless there is normal synthesis
`of the r polypeptide. In a pyrB748 strain carrying the unlinked
`pyrH700 mutation there is a large production ofR subunit (Ta(cid:173)
`ble 2) despite the lack of synthesis of C subunit. In contrast, the
`synthesis of R subunit is very low in a pyrB748 strain lacking
`the pyrH700 mutation (strain HS2307). These observations on
`the production of R subunit are very similar to those for R pro(cid:173)
`duction in comparable backgrounds of pyrB+ strains, in which
`the R subunit exists as ATCase {17). We conclude from these
`results that the normal function of the regulatory region for pyrl
`is unaffected by pyrB748 and that possible trans effects of the
`c polypeptide on pyrl expression are highly unlikely.
`As shown in Table 2, both pyrB754 and pyrB740 mutations
`eliminate production of the R subunit. In the case of pyrB754
`the absence of the r polypeptide is attributed to the deletion
`of the pyrl structural gene {Fig. 2). In pyrB740, however, the
`pyrl structural gene is intact. Thus the elimination ofR subunit
`production must be caused by the removal of the promoter of
`the pyrB-pyrl operon in the pyrB740 deletion with the con(cid:173)
`sequent lack of pyrl expression.
`The DNA sequence determination {Fig. 3) reveals that the
`pyrB gene is promoter-proximal to pyrl in E. coli and that pyrB
`
`and pyrl are contiguous genes. These results account for the
`polarity data of Syvanen and Roth {8) for S. typhimurium and
`the observations with the various deletions discussed above.
`Additional sequence information {34) confirms the gene order
`shown in Fig. 1 with the pyrB cistron closer to the Pst I en(cid:173)
`donuclease recognition site and transcription away from that
`site. Because pyrB was isolated on a Pst I/EcoRI fragment from
`the transducing phage ykl4m5 (see Materials and Methods) and
`a 16.4-kb EcoRI fragment of this phage contains both the pyrB
`and argl genes {34), the Pst I end of the cloned fragment must
`be closer to argl. Therefore, as reported for S. typhimurium
`{8), transcription proceeds away from argl, in the so-called
`counterclockwise direction on the E. coli chromosome {36).
`The IS-nucleotide untranslated region separating pyrB and
`pyrl differs from those for trpE-trpD {37) and trpB-trpA {38),
`whose products are needed in stoichiometric amounts to form
`anthranilate synthase and tryptophan synthase, respectively.
`For both of these pairs of genes the intercistronic region con(cid:173)
`tains only two untranslated nucleotides. Oppenheim and Yan(cid:173)
`ofsky {39) suggested that the small intercistronic regions would
`allow "translational coupling" of the genes by a mechanism in
`which one of the ribosomal subunits remains associated with
`the mRNA throughout translation of both structural genes,
`thereby leading to stoichiometric production of the polypep(cid:173)
`tides. In the case of the pyrB-pyrl operon the intercistronic
`region
`
`***** *
`T-A-A-G-G-G-G-A-A-A-T-A-G-A-G
`
`contains six nucleotides {indicated by asterisks) that have a se(cid:173)
`quence complementary to that of the 16S ribosomal RNA con(cid:173)
`sidered to be important in the initiation of translation. This re(cid:173)
`sult suggests that translational coupling probably does not occur
`in the pyrB-pyrl operon by the same mechanism as in the trp
`operon, even though the products of these genes are all needed
`in stoichiometric amounts to form the oligomeric complexes.
`Our findings demonstrate that the pyrB and p.yrl genes are
`contiguous and are transcribed under the control of the same
`promoter. They are separated by a short intercistronic region
`containing the translational terminator for pyrB and a potential
`ribosome binding site for pyrl. These results unambiguously
`establish that pyrB and pyrl make up an operon encoding the
`catalytic and regulatory chains of ATCase. Completion of the
`nucleotide sequence for this operon should yield additional in(cid:173)
`formation on the structure of ATCase and the regulation of its
`synthesis.
`
`We thank Peter Bullock for valuable advice and Lily Wu for excellent
`technical assistance. This work was supported by National Institute of
`General Medical Sciences Research Grant GM 12159 and by National
`Science Foundation Research Grant PCM76-23308.
`
`1. Gerhart, J. C. & Schachman, H. K. (1965) Biochemistry 4,
`1054-1062.
`2. Weber, K. (1968) Nature (London) 218, 1116-1119.
`3. Wiley, D. C. & Lipscomb, W. N. (1968) Nature (London) 218,
`lll9-1121.
`4. Meighen, E. A., Pigiet, V. & Schachman, H. K. (1970) Proc. Natl
`Acail. Sci. USA 65, 234-241.
`5. Rosenbusch, J. P. & Weber, K. (1971) J. Biol Chern. 246,
`1644-1657.
`
`Merck Ex. 1050, pg 1317
`
`

`
`4024
`
`Biochemistry: Pauza et aL
`
`Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA 79 (1982)
`
`6. Cohlberg, J. A., Pigiet, V. P., Jr., & Schachman, H. K. (1972)
`Biochemistry 11, 3396-3411.
`7. Perbal, B. & Herve, G. (1972}]. MoL BioL 70, 511-529.
`8 .. Syvanen, J. M. & Roth, J. R. (1973}]. MoL BioL 76, 363-378.
`9. O'Donovan, G. A. & Gerhart, J. C. (1972) ] . BacteriaL 109,
`1085-1096.
`10. O'Donovan, G. A., Holoubek, H. & Gerhart, J. C. (1972} Nature
`(London) New BioL 238, 264-266.
`11. Feller, A., Pierard, A., Glansdorff, N., Charlier, D. & Crabeel,
`M. (1981} Nature (London) 292, 370-373.
`12. Beckwith, J. R., Pardee, A. B., Austrian, R. & Jacob, F. (1962}
`] . MoL Biol 5, 618-634.
`13. Taylor, A. L., Beckwith, J. R., Pardee, A. B., Austrian, R. &Ja(cid:173)
`cob, F. (1964}]. Mol Biol8, 771.
`14. Yates, R. A. & Pardee, A. B. (1957)]. B# Chern. 227, 677-692.
`Ingraham, J. L. & Neuhard, J. (1972} ] . BioL Chern. 247,
`15.
`6259-6265.
`16. Justesen, J. & Neuhard, J. (1975)]. Bacterial123, 851-854.
`17. Jenness, D. D. & Schachman, H. K. (1980) J. BacteriaL 141,
`33-40.
`18. Hershey, A. D. & Chase, M. (1952}]. Gen. PhysioL 36, 38-56.
`19. Syvanen, J. M., Yang, Y. R. & Kirschner, M. W. (1973}]. Biol
`Chern. 248, 3762-3768.
`20. Kikuchi, A. & Gorini, L. (1976}]. Micros. BioL Cell. 27, 1-10.
`21. Wu, A. M., Ghosh, S., Echols, H. & Spiegelman;W. G:{l972)
`] . Mol Biol 61, 407-421.
`22. Birnboim, H. C. & Doly, J. (1979} Nucleic Acids Res. 7,
`1513-1523.
`23. Bazaral, M. & Helinski, D. R. (1968)]. MoL Biol36, 185-194.
`
`24. Bolivar, F., Rodriguez, R. L., Greene, P. J., Betlach, M. C.,
`Heyneker, H. L. & Boyer, H. W. (1977} Gene 2, 95-113.
`25. Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C. Y., Boyer, H. W. & Helling, R. B.
`(1973} Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3240-3244.
`26. Legerski, R. J., Hodnett, J. L. & Gray, H. B., Jr. (1978) Nucleic
`Acids Res. 5, 1445-1464.
`27. Sutcliffe, J. G. (1978) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. BioL 43,
`77-90.
`28. Bothwell, M. A. (1975} Dissertation (Univ. of California, Berke(cid:173)
`ley, CA).
`29. Maxam, A. M. & Gilbert, W. (1977) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA
`74, 560-564.
`30. Smith, D. R. & Calvo, J. M. (1980) Nucleic Acids Res. 8,
`2255-2274.
`31. Jenness, D. D. (1980} Dissertation (Univ. of California, Berkeley,
`CA).
`32. Wall, K. A. & Schachman, H. K. (1979} J. BioL Chern. 254,
`11917-11926.
`33. Sutcliffe, J. G. (1978} Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 2721-2728.
`34. Pauza, C. D. (1981} Dissertation (Univ. of California, Berkeley,
`CA}.
`35. Landfear, S. M., Evans, D. R. & Lipscomb, W. N. (1978} Proc.
`Natl Acad. Sci. USA 75, 2654-2658.
`36. Bachmann, B. J. & Low, K. B. (1980} Microbiol Rev. 44, 1-56.
`37. Nichols, B. P., Miozzari, G. F., van Cleemput, M., Bennett, G.
`N. & Yanofsky, C. (1980}]. Mol Biol142, 503-517.
`38. Platt, T. & Yanofsky, C. (1975) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72,
`2399-2403.
`39. Oppenheim, D. S. & Yanofsky, C. (1980} Genetics 95, 78.5-795.
`
`Merck Ex. 1050, pg 1318

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket