`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`U.S. Patent No. 8,664,231
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`KOIOS PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`MEDAC GESELLSCHAFT FUER KLINISCHE
`SPEZIALPRÄPARATE MBH,
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-01370
`Patent Number 8,664,231
`____________
`
`Before JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, TONI R. SCHEINER,
`and ERICA A. FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`HENRY HUANG
`
`Pursuant to Rule 42.10(c), and as authorized in the Board’s Notice of Filing
`
`Date Accorded to Petition (Paper 6), Patent Owner medac Gesellschaft für Klinische
`
`Spezialpräparate mbH (“Medac”) respectfully requests pro hac vice admission of
`
`Henry Huang as a back-up counsel in this proceeding.
`
`I.
`
`Time for Filing
`
`This Motion is timely because it is being filed no sooner than 21 days after
`
`service of the Petition in this proceeding, which occurred on July 20, 2016.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`U.S. Patent No. 8,664,231
`
`The following statement of facts demonstrates that there is good cause for the
`
`Board to recognize Henry Huang as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Huang is an experienced litigation attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Mr. Huang has been
`
`practicing law since 2007 and has extensive experience litigating patent
`
`infringement cases in different District Courts across the country. Among his
`
`experience in patent litigation matters, Mr. Huang has participated in a variety of
`
`patent-related hearings and pleadings concerning, inter alia, patent validity and
`
`infringement issues. Mr. Huang has also worked on post-grant proceedings at the
`
`USPTO, including reexaminations, inter partes reviews, and covered business
`
`method reviews. Mr. Huang is familiar with U.S. Patent No. 8,664,231 (“the ’231
`
`Patent”) and the issues involved in this case. Petitioner does not oppose Mr. Huang’s
`
`admission pro hac vice.
`
`III. Declaration of Henry Huang
`
`As directed by the Board, this Motion is also accompanied by the Declaration
`
`of Henry Huang in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission (Exhibit A)
`
`attesting to the requirements laid out in the Board’s Order Authorizing Motion for
`
`Pro Hac Vice Admission in Case IPR2013-00639 (Paper 7). For the foregoing
`
`reasons as well as the reasons contained in the attached declaration, Medac
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`U.S. Patent No. 8,664,231
`
`respectfully requests admission of Henry Huang as counsel pro hac vice.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 20, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`HALEY GUILIANO LLP
`
` /James F. Haley, Jr./
`
`James F. Haley, Jr., Lead Counsel
`Registration No. 27,794
`james.haley@hglaw.com
`T: 646-973-2502
`
`Brian Gummow, Backup Counsel
`Registration No. 63,933
`brian.gummow@hglaw.com
`T: 646-973-2513
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`U.S. Patent No. 8,664,231
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION
`
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF HENRY HUANG and EXHIBIT 2100 have
`
`been served in their entirety by filing these documents through the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E), as well as providing courtesy copies via e-
`
`mail to the attorneys of record for the Petitioners listed below:
`
`Lead Counsel:
`
`DeAnn F. Smith, Reg. No. 36,683
`Foley Hoag LLP
`155 Seaport Blvd.
`Boston MA 02210-2600
`T: 617-832-1230
`F: 617-832-7000
`dsmith@foleyhoag.com
`
`ipr2016-01370@foleyhoag.com
`Back-up Counsel: William Rothwell, Reg. No. 72,522
`Noroozi PC
`2245 Texas Dr. Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`T: 281-566-2685
`F: 844-975-7074
`william@noroozipc.com
`
`Kayvan B. Noroozi
`Noroozi PC
`1299 Ocean Ave., Suite 450
`Santa Monica, CA 90401
`T.: 310-975-7074
`kayvan@noroozipc.com
`
`
`Dated: October 20, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Crena Pacheco/
`Name: Crena Pacheco
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
