`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`KOIOS PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MEDAC GESELLSCHAFT FÜR KLINISCHE
`SPEZIALPRÄPARATE MBH,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01370
` Patent No. 8,664,231
`____________________
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s February 8, 2017,
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 14), Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument
`
`on the issues raised in the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent
`
`8,664,231, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Patent Owner’s Response,
`
`and Petitioners’ Reply to Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`Per the Board’s Scheduling Order, oral argument is currently set for
`
`November 7, 2017. Petitioner requests 60 minutes per side for the oral
`
`argument.
`
`The issues to be argued are:
`
`• The instituted grounds of unpatentability, namely whether:
`
`o claims 1, 2, 4–6, 11–13, 17, and 22 are unpatentable as
`anticipated by Grint;
`
`o claims 7–10, 14–16, and 19–21 are unpatentable in view of
`Grint, Arthur, Moitra, and Insulin Admin.;
`
`o claim 18 is unpatentable in view of Grint and Alsufyani;
`o claims 1–6, 11–13, 17, 18, and 22 are unpatentable in view of
`Wyeth; and
`
`o claims 1–6, 11–13, 17, 18, and 22 are unpatentable over Wyeth,
`Brooks, Arthur, and Moitra;
`
`• Any issues identified in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`• Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`• Any other issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including
`
`issues raised in papers yet to be filed, such as Motions to Exclude; and
`
`• Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Additionally, Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual
`
`equipment to display possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use
`
`of a computer, projector and screen.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ William P. Rothwell
`
`William P. Rothwell (Back-Up Counsel)
`Reg. No. 72,522
`NOROOZI PC
`2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`william@noroozipc.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`Date: October 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01370
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served electronically via e-
`
`mail on October 2, 2017, to the following counsel of record for Patent
`
`Owner:
`
`James F. Haley (Lead Counsel)
`Brian Gummow (Back-up Counsel)
`Service E-mail address
`
`james.haley@hglaw.com
`brian.gummow@hglaw.com
`IPR2016-01370_Medac@ropesgray.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ William P. Rothwell
`
`William P. Rothwell (Back-Up Counsel)
`Reg. No. 72,522
`NOROOZI PC
`2245 Texas Drive, Suite 300
`Sugar Land, TX 77479
`william@noroozipc.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: October 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`