throbber
Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` KOIOS PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`vs.
`Case No. IPR2016-01370
`Patent No. 8,664,231
` MEDAC GESELLSCHAFT FÜR
` KLINISCHE SPEZIALPRAPARATE
` MBH,
`
`Patent Owner.
` --------------------------)
`
`DEPOSITION OF THOMAS ZIZIC, Ph.D.
`New York, New York
`Friday, August 25, 2017
`
`Reported by:
`Shauna Stoltz-Laurie, RPR, CLR
`JOB NO. 19486
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Page 1 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`August 25, 2017
`11:33 a.m.
`
` Deposition of THOMAS ZIZIC, Ph.D.
` held at the offices of Ropes & Gray
` LLP, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New
` York, New York, New York, pursuant to
` Notice, before Shauna Stoltz-Laurie, a
` Certified Realtime Reporter and Notary
` Public of the State of New York.
`
`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` NOROOZI P.C.
` Attorneys for Petitioner
` 1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 450
` Santa Monica, California 90401
` BY: KAYVAN B. NOROOZI, ESQ.
` Kayvan@noroozipc.com
`
` HALEY & GIULIANO LLP
` Attorneys for Patent Owner
` 75 Broad Street, Suite 1000
` New York, New York 10004
` BY: JAMES F. HALEY, ESQ.
` Haley@hglaw.com
`
`12345
`
`6
`
`78
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`12
`
`34
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
` T H O M A S Z I Z I C , called as a
` witness, having been duly sworn by a Notary
` Public, was examined and testified as
` follows:
` EXAMINATION BY
` MR. NOROOZI:
`Q. Good morning, Dr. Zizic.
`A. Good morning.
`Q.
`Is that how you pronounce it?
`A. Zizic.
`Q. Okay. Thank you.
`And how long did you prepare for
` today's deposition?
`A.
`I met with Mr. Haley yesterday.
`Q. For about how many hours?
`A. Probably about six hours.
`Q. And some more time this morning as
` well?
`A. Not -- I can't say we really
` prepared this morning. I ended up doing a
` little preparation because it was delayed,
` but we didn't really prepare this morning.
`Q. What materials did you review in
` preparation?
`
`Page 5
`
`Zizic
`A. Everything --
`MR. HALEY: You can say generally.
` You can say only generally what you
` reviewed, not specifically.
` THE WITNESS: Okay.
`A.
`I basically reviewed all the
` materials that I stated in my report that I
` reviewed.
`Q. Did you review anything new that
` was not discussed or mentioned in your
` declaration?
`A. No.
`Q. Do you understand that in this
` particular deposition setting, because it's a
` deposition related to an inter-parties
` review, you're not permitted to discuss any
` aspects of your testimony or anything related
` to this deposition with counsel during
` breaks?
`A.
`I understand that.
`MR. HALEY: Except, of course,
` attorney-client privilege issues.
` MR. NOROOZI: During breaks, there
` is no communication about the subject
`2 (Pages 2 to 5)
`
`Page 2 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`Zizic
`
` MR. HALEY: Okay.
`Q. All right. Dr. Zizic -- right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Dr. Zizic, you say in your
` declaration, in tab A at the bottom of page
` 25 if you use the numbering at the bottom of
` your declaration, that you've actively
` practiced rheumatology full time at Johns
` Hopkins until 1985; is that correct?
`A. That is correct.
`Q. Did you continue to practice
` rheumatology full time after 1985?
`A. Yes. Up until 1985, I was on the
` full-time faculty, and all of my income went
` to the university.
` In 1986, I joined Dr. Peter Holt,
` and I presently am still in practice full
` time with him.
`Q. When you say full time, what do you
` mean by that?
`A. Full time.
`Q. Well, in addition to your
` rheumatology practice, you have other
`
`1
`
`23
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
` professional pursuits, true?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And when you say that you practiced
` rheumatology full time, do you mean that
` you're in your office treating patients five
` days a week, eight hours a day?
`A. No. I'm probably there three days
` a week on average, sometimes ten and 12 hours
` a day.
`In paragraph one of your
`Q.
` declaration, you say that you have treated
` thousands of patients for rheumatoid
` arthritis, right?
`A. Most certainly.
`Q. And are you still actively treating
` patients for rheumatoid arthritis?
`A. Yes.
`Q. How often?
`A. Probably 50 to a hundred patients a
` year.
`Q. And you prescribe them with
` medication?
`A.
`Including Rasuvo, which Medac
` provides us samples.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
` matter of the testimony.
` MR. HALEY: Except attorney-client
` privilege issues.
` MR. NOROOZI: I'm not sure I
` follow what you mean by that. You mean
` that if I ask a question that may
` implicate privilege issues, you --
` MR. HALEY: Right. And then we can
` have a discussion about that to make
` sure that there's a privilege or not
` privilege direction. That's what the
` rules say.
` MR. NOROOZI: Sure. That's fine.
`Q. Let me talk to you about your
` professional background a bit.
` Now, one second. Do you have any
` materials with you yourself today?
`A. No.
`Q. All right. Taken a look at your
` declaration recently?
`A.
`I did.
`Q. Let me give you a copy of your
` declaration that's already been marked as an
` exhibit in this proceeding. Your declaration
`Page 7
`
`Zizic
` has been marked as Exhibit 2092.
` MR. HALEY: Counsel, do you have a
` copy for me?
` MR. NOROOZI: I don't. I only
` have one copy of everything. If you
` want, we can take a quick break and
` print one out.
` MR. HALEY: I'll see if I can find
` a copy. (Perusing documents).
`Q. Dr. Zizic, do you know if there is
` a copy of your declaration that you were
` looking at this morning, by any chance, that
` you could give to counsel?
`A.
`I have a marked-up copy.
`MR. NOROOZI: So, Jim --
`MR. HALEY: I thought I brought
` one. Just a second.
` MR. NOROOZI: Okay.
` THE WITNESS: You know what? It's
` on the desk, because you put your phone
` number on the other side of it.
` MR. NOROOZI: Take a quick pause.
` (Mr. Haley left the room, then
` rejoined the proceedings.)
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`3 (Pages 6 to 9)
`
`Page 3 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
`Q. Right.
`And what about the methotrexate
` product; do you prescribe that as well?
`A. The what?
`Q. There is another methotrexate
` auto-injected product made by a company named
` Antaris, and it is called Otrexup,
`O-T-R-E-X-U-P. Have you heard of that
`product?
`A.
`I have not. They have not called
` on our office.
` Medac calls on our office and
` provides us with samples of all the various
` dosages, depending on where the patient
` graduates to.
`Q. The first time that you heard about
` the Rasuvo product was through a Medac rep?
`A.
`I don't know that for a fact.
`I mean I -- I don't know how I
` heard about Rasuvo first. I know Dr. Schiff,
` and I know Dr. Whitelefter (sic) as well here
` in Boston, and he was a former resident, so I
` know a lot of people that use methotrexate
` all the time.
`
`Page 11
`
`Zizic
` I don't know when I first heard
` about Rasuvo.
`Q. How do you know Dr. Schiff?
`A. Professionally, through meetings.
`Q. Have you ever collaborated with
` him?
`I have not.
`A.
`Is he a clinician and researcher
`Q.
` held in high regard in the rheumatology
` community?
`A. You know, I --
`MR. HALEY: Object, form.
`-- I don't know how he's held in
`A.
` the general rheumatology community.
` I know that I disagree with his
` opinion in terms of this case, so --
`Q. With some of his opinions, or all
` of his opinions?
`A. No, some of his opinions, as stated
` in my report.
`Q. Now, in paragraph one, when you
` talk about your experience treating patients
` you mention rheumatoid arthritis but you
` don't mention psoriasis; is that right?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Zizic
`A. No, I don't mention psoriasis.
`Q. And have you treated patients with
` psoriasis as part of your practice?
`A. Of course. Psoriatic arthritis,
` some of whom have psoriatic skin disease
` without arthritis, but I certainly do treat
` psoriatic arthritis.
`Q. And is that still an active
` component of the patient population you see?
`A. Yes. Not as prevalent as
` rheumatoid arthritis.
`Q. Do you prescribe methotrexate to
` patients with psoriatic arthritis?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And do those prescriptions differ
` in any way, including with respect to dosage,
` compared to your typical rheumatoid arthritis
` patient?
`A. Not any systematic difference.
`Q. And do you also actively treat
` patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis?
`A. Very few. We have a number of
` pediatric rheumatologist at Hopkins. When I
` first started we didn't have any pediatric
`Page 13
`
`Zizic
` rheumatologists, so I saw all of them along
` with the rest of the full-time faculty, but
` not now.
`Q. How long has it been since you've
` deferred to other specialists for treating
` juvenile rheumatoid arthritis?
` MR. HALEY: Objection to form.
`A.
`I can't really answer that, because
` some of the patients that I saw when they
` were juveniles are now adults, and I'm still
` taking care of them, so I don't know how to
` answer that quite.
`Q. Well, with respect to new patients,
` how long has it been since you've deferred to
` other specialists for the treatment of JRA?
` MR. HALEY: Objection, form.
`A. Under 16, probably 30 years, 25
` years, somewhere in there.
`Q. And does that mean that you have
` not taken on new juvenile rheumatoid
` arthritis patients in the past 25 to 30
` years?
`A. That's probably fairly accurate. I
` can say that I hadn't (sic) taken on a few
`4 (Pages 10 to 13)
`
`Page 4 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
` because of colleagues who wanted me
` specifically to see the patient, but for the
` most part, that's true.
`Q. Are you familiar with any
` systematic differences in the way that
` methotrexate is a prescribed, including with
` respect to dosage, for patients with juvenile
` rheumatoid arthritis?
`A. Yes.
`Q. What are they?
`A. Well, in general, you're looking at
` milligrams per meter squared to be able to
` compensate for the difference in size and
` therefore the dosage that you administer. So
` until they get to more than 75 pounds or more
` than 16 years of age, you generally are doing
` it milligrams per meters squared rather than
` the way we treat adults.
`Q. Does that approach result in -- on
` average higher dosages being given to
` patients with JRA than patients with
` rheumatoid arthritis?
`A.
`I don't know that I can say that
` directly. I mean because you're going up to
`Page 15
`
`Zizic
` a maximum. You still start at a lower dose
` for JRA, and work up, you don't go up to the
` maximum, ten milligrams or 15 milligrams per
` metered squared. So I can't answer that.
`Q. Now, before July of 2006 --
`MR. NOROOZI: Withdrawn.
`Q. Have you ever personally
` administered methotrexate to a person?
`A. You mean me given the injection?
`Q. Yes.
`A. No.
`Generally a nurse does that.
`Q. Have you ever personally formulated
` a methotrexate solution for injection?
`A. No.
`Q. Have you prescribed methotrexate
` for injection to your patients?
`A. Of course, yes.
`Q. And you've done that with
` specificity as to the administration format,
` true?
`A. Dose and administration format.
`Q. Before July 26, did you prescribe
` the administration of methotrexate for the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Zizic
` treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases
` in intramuscular administration form?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Before July 26, did you prescribe
` the administration of methotrexate for the
` treatment of inflammatory autoimmune disease
` in subcutaneous forms?
`A.
`I have.
`Q. Regularly?
`A. Regularly.
`Q. And was there a point in time when
` you switched from prescribing the
` intramuscular form to the subcutaneous, or
` did you consistently prescribe both around
` the same time period?
` MR. HALEY: Objection, form.
`A.
`I think there was a gradual trend
` for more subcutaneous than intramuscular over
` that period of time before and more so even
` presently, particularly since Rasuvo has been
` present. But there are variables at which
` one you're going to prescribe, sometimes the
` patient doesn't want to give themselves sub-Q
` injections, so they come in to the clinic and
`Page 17
`
`Zizic
` get an IM injection, or sub-Q.
`Q. Now, prior to July 26 did you
` prescribe methotrexate to patients for the
` treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases
` in subcutaneous form in a self-administrable
` syringe or some other type of injection
` device?
`A.
`I don't remember using an injection
` device prior.
`Q. Well, let me be specific, because
` when I said injection device I mean any type
` of -- any type of injection, including a
` prefilled syringe. Do you follow me on that?
`A.
`I do.
`Q. And even a vial and syringe, where
` the patient draws their own methotrexate.
` Are you with me on that?
`A.
`I'm with you.
`Q. All right. Now, prior to July 2006
` did you ever prescribe methotrexate for
` treating inflammatory autoimmune diseases to
` be administered subcutaneously to patients in
` a form where the patient would administer
` their own methotrexate?
`5 (Pages 14 to 17)
`
`Page 5 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
`A. Yes.
`Q.
`In what formats, in what sort of
` injection approaches?
`A. Subcutaneous.
`Q. And using what type of device, a
` prefilled syringe, or a vial and syringe and
` draw method? How would you describe it?
`A. Prime --
`MR. HALEY: Objection, form.
`THE WITNESS: I'm sorry.
`MR. HALEY: Objection, form.
`-- primarily vial and syringe.
`A.
`Q. Why would you make such a
` prescription?
`A. Well, there were 25 milligram per
` cc's in two-cc vials, there were ten
` milligram per cc, and there were 25 milligram
` ten -- in ten-cc vials so that patients at
` home could administer the weekly injection
` until the next clinic visit, and so it was --
` they have a preservative for sub-Q, and so it
` was meant for that.
`Q. Well, would you prescribe
` self-administration because of the
`
`Page 19
`
`Zizic
` convenience benefits to the patient?
`A. Well, more than convenience.
` There's several aspects to it.
` One was the fact that it's
` generally less painful than the IM injection
` because methotrexate is irritating.
` And it was also more convenient for
` them in terms of not having to come in to the
` clinic.
` And less costly to the healthcare
` system: They didn't have a nurse visit every
` week. They didn't have to worry about
` transportation costs or taking off time from
` work or whatever.
`Q. When you would prescribe
` methotrexate prior to July 26 would you
` simply prescribe concentration amounts that
` were available on the market as FDA-approved
` products?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Did you ever prescribe, prior to
` July 2006, a methotrexate solution that would
` have required reconstitution?
`A. No. I didn't use any compounding
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Zizic
` or -- with my patients. It wasn't necessary.
`Q. Regardless of dosage format,
` whether intramuscular or subcutaneous or
` anything else, you never asked anybody to
` formulate a methotrexate solution for one of
` your patients in a concentration that was
` above 25 milligrams per milliliter?
`A.
`I did not.
`Q. Did you ever ask anybody in your
` entire career to formulate methotrexate in
` any concentration for any of your patients?
`A. No.
`It was available so that you could
` give them what they needed.
`Q. Meaning that you prescribed
` methotrexate in already-constituted liquid
` vials or some other approach where the
` solution was already prepared?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And the solution came prepared in
` the product itself?
`A. Correct.
`Q. Are you aware of any physicians or
` other colleagues, including pharmacists
`
`Page 21
`
`Zizic
` pharmacologists that you've worked with in
` your career, who have reconstituted
` methotrexate?
`A. Early on in my career, in terms of
` chemotherapy for leukemia or osteosarcoma,
` but not for rheumatic diseases.
`Q.
`It's true that once the
` methotrexate solution arrives already
` constituted, its concentration cannot be
` increased, it can only be decreased, right?
`A. That is correct.
`Q. However, when the methotrexate
` comes in powder form, lyophilized for
` reconstitution, its concentration can be
` selected within a wide range depending on how
` much liquid you use to reconstitute it,
` right?
`A. That is correct.
`Q.
`In your declaration, you talk about
` toxicity risks potentially associated with
` cytotoxic drugs, correct?
`A. Correct.
`Q.
`In your declaration, you don't cite
` to any study or article from prior to July
`6 (Pages 18 to 21)
`
`Page 6 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
` 2006 that shows that concentrations of
` methotrexate above 25 milligrams per
` milliliter administered either
` intramuscularly or subcutaneously cause
` toxicity, true?
`A.
`I'm not aware of it being given in
` concentrations above that.
`Q. Well, before we get there, I just
` want to get a direct answer to my question so
` I understand what's in your declaration. Is
` that fair?
`A. That's fair.
`Q. All right. In your declaration,
` you don't cite to any studies that show that
` administering methotrexate in concentrations
` above 25 milligrams per milliliter either
` intramuscularly or subcutaneously causes
` toxicity to the patient, true?
`A.
`I am not aware of any studies that
` were done on concentrations above 25
` milligrams of methotrexate per cc given
` intramuscularly or subcutaneously, period, so
` there's no articles I can cite to you,
` because to my knowledge, they don't exist.
`Page 23
`
`Zizic
`Q. Now, when you say 25 milligrams per
` cc you mean 25 milligrams per milliliter. Is
` that the same thing?
`A. Cc's and milliliters are the same
` thing, yes.
`Q. You're not aware of such studies,
` right?
`A. No, it's not true. I have it in my
` declaration.
`Q. Okay. So I'm sorry, if I could
` make sure you answer the question in a way
` that's clear.
` (Technical failure interruption,
` and a brief recess was taken.)
`Q. All right, Dr. Zizic, we were
` discussing whether you have cited to any
` studies in your declaration that show that
` either intramuscular or subcutaneous
` administration of methotrexate in any
` particular concentration, because of its
` concentration, not dosage, causes toxicity in
` parents. Do you recall that question?
`A. You stated it a little differently
` that time.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Zizic
`Q. And what's the difference in this
` articulation compared to last time?
`A. Well, you're stating now to citing
` papers that state because of concentration
` and not its dosage.
` But be that as it may, I'm
` understanding your question.
`Q. And you also understand that my
` question is specific to the paper being
` directed specifically to methotrexate and
` only two dosage formats, either intramuscular
` and subcutaneous, right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And with that understanding, is it
` your opinion that you have such studies in
` your declaration cited?
`A. Yes.
`Q. Could you direct me to where?
`A. On page eight, the Gaze paper, Case
` 13, noting "Infusion of methotrexate 100
` milligrams with resulting sloughing."
`Q. "Infusion of methotrexate 100
` milligrams" refers to the dosage of
` methotrexate, correct?
`
`Page 25
`
`Zizic
`It refers to the dosage, the
`A.
` amount, yes.
`Q. And so where on page eight in your
` discussion of Gaze do you show that Gaze
` talks about concentration of methotrexate
` causing toxicity?
`A. Well, that's not in the
` declaration.
`If you'd like to look at the paper,
` I can explain to you what it is saying.
`Q. Well, but as a starting point your
` declaration's discussion of Gaze, which is
` Exhibit 2095 and which is discussed here on
` page eight of your declaration, does not
` itself show a reference to Gaze that
` discusses concentration of methotrexate
` creating toxicity in parents, right?
`A.
`I don't agree with that.
`Q. Okay. So you have only the top
` half of page eight is talking about Gaze,
` right?
`A. Correct.
`Q. And there are two quotes from Gaze
` in the top half of page eight, right?
`7 (Pages 22 to 25)
`
`Page 7 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
`A. Correct.
`Q. The first quote is not specifically
` discussing methotrexate at all, right?
`A.
`(Reading) Well, methotrexate is a
` chemotherapeutic agent, so I don't know if I
` can agree it's not discussing it. It doesn't
` mention it specifically, but it is in the
` class of chemotherapeutic agents that he's
` talking about.
`Q. Well, and my question was the first
` quote from Gaze is not specifically
` discussing methotrexate, and you agree with
` that, right?
`A.
`It is not specifically mentioning
` methotrexate, which is a chemotherapeutic
` agent, however.
`Q. All right. Now, the second quote
` from Gaze is only talking about a dosage
` amount of methotrexate, not a concentration,
` right?
`A. Not as in here, not in here, that's
` correct.
`Q. All right. Now, do you recall,
` from the Gaze paper, what was the
`
`Page 27
`
`Zizic
` concentration of methotrexate associated with
` that 100 milligram dosage?
`A.
`I do recall.
`Q. And what was it?
`A.
`It was 100 milligrams in one liter.
`Q. And so what does that come out to
` in milligrams per milliliter?
`A.
`It would come out to be one-tenth
` of a milligram per milliliter in the entire
` solution.
`Q. And so the Gaze paper is talking
` about toxicity of methotrexate associated
` with a concentration of -- what was the
` amount?
`A.
`.1 milligram per milliliter.
`Q. Okay. And so that is one-250th the
` concentration of what you referred to in your
` declaration as a standard 25 milligram per
` milliliter concentration of methotrexate that
` you were familiar with, right?
`A. No.
`Q. The Gaze paper was discussing a
` concentration of methotrexate of .1
` milligrams per milliliter?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Zizic
`A. Correct.
`Q. And so if it were one milligram per
` milliliter, that would be a 25th of the
` standard concentration that you were familiar
` with, right?
`A. Right.
`But I don't think that you could
` look of extravasation in the soft tissues,
` where several hundred cc's could be present
` in the soft tissue that is also there for a
` prolonged period because it has to be
` absorbed through the capillaries, and it may
` even get trapped in some of the fascial
` planes. So you may have exposure for an
` extreme amount of time. So you can't -- you
` can't equate 25 cc's -- 25 milligrams per cc
` that you inject under the skin or
` intramuscularly, where it's going to be
` absorbed reasonably quickly, compared to
` hundreds of cc's that can get out of the
` extravasation into the soft tissue and be
` there for a prolonged period. So it's not an
` equatable -- it's not apples and apples. So
` I'm just -- you know, your example, your
`Page 29
`
`Zizic
` strict milligrams per cc, doesn't apply here.
`Q. So I think I understand you, and I
` just want to make sure that we're on the same
` page.
` MR. NOROOZI: Withdrawn.
`Q. There's a concentration of the
` methotrexate solution which is denoted in
` milligrams per milliliter, such as 25
` milligrams per milliliter. You're familiar
` with that, right?
`A. Of course I am, yes.
`Q. And there's another concept, which
` is a concentration of methotrexate that is
` either in the patient's tissue or in the
` patient's blood after administration. You're
` familiar with that, too, right?
`A.
`I am.
`Q. Those are two different concepts,
` right?
`A. They are not two different
` concepts. They are two different amounts
` that are -- the tissue's being exposed to.
`Q. Well, if we have a one-gram dose of
` methotrexate administered to a patient,
`8 (Pages 26 to 29)
`
`Page 8 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`Page 32
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
` whether it's administered in 25 milligrams
` per milliliter or ten milligrams per
` milliliter will not affect the concentration
` of methotrexate that is the patient's blood
` plasma or in their tissue, right?
`A. No, that is wrong.
`Q. "That is" --
`A.
`-- wrong.
`Q. Okay. So you're saying that if you
` apply the same dosage of methotrexate, the
` same dosage amount, one gram, if you apply
` that in a higher or lower concentration, that
` will impact the concentration of methotrexate
` that is in the patient's blood?
`A.
`It depends upon the rate of
` administration. It depends upon whether
` there are third spaces, such as pleural
` effusions, peritoneal, effusions where
` methotrexate going to get in and clear much
` more slowly. It depends upon the kidney
` function, renal clearance. So it depends how
` quickly you put in that thousand milligrams.
` If you put it in, as your example
` intends, in ten-milligram increments or a
`Page 31
`
`Zizic
` hundred-milligram increments, you could have
` a very significant difference in the plasma
` concentration that the cells are exposed to,
` based on the metabolism, the excretion --
`Q. Okay.
`A.
`-- and other factors, such as third
` spaces.
`Q. So I think my example may not have
` been clear. I think maybe there's a
` misunderstanding on my question. I'll try to
` clear it up.
` Let's assume an experiment. Are
` you with me so far?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And in this experiment, we're going
` to keep every variable constant except one.
` Are you with me there?
`A. Sure.
`Q. That's a good way to do
` experiments, right?
`A.
`If you can.
`Q. Now, when I said every variable
` constant I mean the same kidney -- right? --
` and the same rate at which the drug is
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`Zizic
` administered, and the same administration
` format, and every other relevant factor the
` same except for one factor, which is the
` concentration of the methotrexate in
` milligrams per milliliter. Are you with me
` so far?
`A. Okay.
`Q. Now, in scenario A, we have ten
` milligrams of methotrexate that's being
` administered at a concentration of ten
` milligrams per milliliter. Are you with me
` there?
`I am.
`A.
`Q. And so we know that that is going
` to be one milliliter of methotrexate, right?
`A. Correct.
`Q. All right. Now --
`MR. HALEY: Objection, form.
`Q. Okay. In scenario B, we're going
` to still administer ten milligrams of
` methotrexate. Are you with me there?
`A. Um-hm.
`Q. Except we're going to do it in 25
` milligram per milliliter concentration. Are
`Page 33
`
`Zizic
` you with me there?
`A. Okay.
`Q. Now, nothing else is different
` between scenario A and scenario B in terms of
` the patient, the administration format, the
` amount of time it's administered and so
` forth. Are you with me on that?
`A.
`I am.
`Q.
`Is it your testimony that the
` concentration of methotrexate that will be in
` the patient's blood in scenario A will be any
` different than the concentration that will be
` in their blood in scenario B?
`A. Assuming you're giving .4
` milliliters in scenario B, is that the
` assumption I'm supposed to make?
`Q. The .4 milliliters will be the
` consequence of the fact that you're giving
` ten milligrams at 25 milligrams per
` milliliter, right?
`A. Correct.
`Q. Okay.
`A. You didn't tell me how much you're
` going to put in, though. How much are you
`9 (Pages 30 to 33)
`
`Page 9 of 53
`
`KOIOS Exhibit 1039
`
`

`

`Page 34
`
`Page 36
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Zizic
` putting in in scenario B?
`Q. Well, it's ten milligrams --
`A. Right.
`Q.
`-- at 25 milligrams per
` milliliter --
`A. Right.
`Q.
`-- which, as you said, is .4
` milliliters, right?
`A. Yes.
`Q. And so we're putting in the same
` dosage of methotrexate in two different
` concentrations, resulting in scenario A
` having a one-milliliter injection of ten
` milligrams of methotrexate, and scenario B
` having a .4-milliliter injection of ten
` milligrams methotrexate, correct?
`A. Correct.
`And this is administered
` intravenously; is that what you're saying?
`Q. Let's assume it's administered
` subcutaneously. Will there be any
` difference, in your view, in the
` concentration of methotrexate that is in the
` patient's blood between scenario A and
`
`Page 35
`
`Zizic
` scenario B?
`A. There may or may not be.
`Q. You can't say one way or another?
`A. Well, it would either be the same
` or slightly less in the .4/25 milligrams per
` cc, because you may cause some irritation and
` spasm of the pre-capillary arterials in the
` area, so you may have a little bit of delay
` in absorption in scenario B as compared to
` scenario A, but that would be the variable
` that you're not able to control for, because
` you've got a different concentration, two and
` a half times stronger, that the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket