throbber
630
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND jOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`Sept. 22, tsrr
`
`In Stage 1 melanoma of the limbs, delayed dissec-
`tion of lymph nodes (i.e., performed at the time of ap-
`pearance of regional metastases) is as effective in the
`control of the disease as immediate dissection. Since
`the proportion of positive nodes ranges from 20 to 25
`per cent, the “wait-and-see” policy avoids unneces-
`sary postoperative complications in three fourths
`of the patients. for whom the “prophylactic” dissec—
`tion would result in negative histologic findings in re-
`gional nodes. Delayed dissection is advisable as long
`as the patient can be kept under strict clinical con-
`trol.
`
`We are indebted to the surgical and pathological stalls ofthe in-
`stitutes listed for their eta-operation, particularly to Dr. A. Lame.
`London, chairman of the pathologists’ panel for the care taken in
`the diagnostic confirmation of cases and for his cwrdination ofthe
`panel’s work, and to Dr. A. Breslow, Washington. D.C.. and Dr.
`E. P. van der Esch. Amsterdam. Netherlands, for the reclassifica-
`tion at cases according to maximum thickness and levels of inva-
`SlOn.
`
`REFERENCES
`l. Breslow A: Tumor thickness. level of invasion and node dissection in
`stage I cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 182572-575, I975
`2. Goldsmith HS. Shah JP. Kin DH: Prognostic significance of lymph node
`dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Cancer 26:606-609.
`i9'l'0
`3. Holmes EC. Clark W. Morton DL. et al: Regional lymph node metasta-
`ses and the level at invasion of primary melanoma. Cancer 37:199-20l.
`I‘J'ltfi
`4. Wanebo HJ. Former JG. Woodrufl’l. et all Selection of the optimum
`surgical
`treatment of state i melanoma by depth oi microinvaston:
`use of the combined microstage technique (Clark-Brestow). Ann Stirs
`182302-35.
`l9'i‘5
`S. Rodenth DC: Basic principles of Surgery: malignant melanoma. Mel-
`anoma and Skin Cancer: Proceedings of the International Cancer Con-
`ference. Sydney.
`|9T2. Edited by W McCarthy. Sydney. Blight. [972. pp
`497-416
`6. Davis NC: Cutaneous melanoma:
`Probl 5ng l3(5)1l-63. 19M
`7'. Morabito A. Marubini E: A computer program suitable for fitting tine-
`ar models when the dependent variable is dichotomous: polichotomous
`or censored survival and non-linear models when the dependent vari-
`able is quantitative. Comput Programs Biomed 5283-295. 1976
`8. Clark WI-l Jr, From L. Bernardino EA. et alt The histogenesis and bio-
`logic behavior of primary human malignant melanomas of the skin.
`Cancer Res 29:705-727. I969
`
`the Queensland experience. Curr
`
`USE OF PLASMA PHARMACOKINETICS TO PREDICT AND PREVENT
`METHOTREXATE TOXICITY
`
`RONALD G. STOLLER, M.D., KENNETH R. HANDE, M.D., SAMUEL A. Jnooas, M.D.,
`STEVEN A. ROSENBERG, M.D., AND BRUCE A. CHABNER, MD.
`
`Abstract To correlate the pharmacokinetics and tox-
`icity ol methotrexate. we measured the drug's clear-
`ance from plasma alter 395 high-dose, six-hour intu-
`sions given to 73 patients. After 375 infusions. 48-hour
`methotroxato levels tell within 2 standard deviations of
`the mean for nontoxic infusions. and myelosuppres-
`sion did not occur. Methotrexate concentrations ex-
`ceeded the range for nontoxic patients (mean 1:2 stan-
`dard deviations) after 20 infusions. Serious myolosup-
`pression occurred after six of these 20 infusions. in-
`cluding live of 12 infusions associated with 43-hour
`
`drug concentrations above 9 x 10-7 M. In seven pa-
`tients with 48-hour concentrations above 9 x 10-"r
`M. the absence of toxicity could be attributed to sub-
`sequent rapid clearanoe of the drug; tour of these
`patients also received large doses of supplemental
`leucovorin (50 to 100 mg per square meter every
`six hours). Determination of methotrexate concentra-
`tion in plasma thus identified patients at high risk of
`toxicity. a group that may benefit from Supplemen-
`tal
`leucovorin rescue.
`(N Engl J Med 297:630634.
`1977)
`
`METHOTREXATE. an effective agent in treat-
`ment of leukemia, choriocarcinoma and other
`tumors,
`is one of the most versatile antineoplastic
`agents because its toxicity in high-dose regimens can
`be prevented by the reduced folate, leucovorin (5-for-
`myltetrahydrofolate).‘ High-dose methotrexate regi-
`mens (50 mg per kilogram or more) with leuCovorin
`rescue have produced responses in metastatic osteo-
`genic sarcoma2 and other tumorsJ and have length-
`ened the reiapse-free interval when used as an adju-
`vant after surgical excision of nonmetastatic osteo-
`genic sat‘coma.‘I
`High-dose methotrexate therapy has not been with-
`Out serious complications. Although the majority of
`
`From the Clinical Pharmacology. Surgery and Medicine branches of the
`National Cancer Institute. National Institutes of Health (address reprint re-
`quests to Dr. Chabner at Rm. (SN-119. Bldg.
`l0. National Institutes of
`Health. Bethesda. MD 20014).
`
`such infusions cause only minor side effects. severe
`and prolonged myelosuppression and mucositis have
`developed in approximately 10 per cent of patients,
`and fatalities directly attributable to drug toxicity
`have occurred in 29 of 498 patients (6 per cent) treat-
`ed with high-dose methotrexate. according to a re-
`cent survey of cancer treatment centers in the United
`States.5 Experimental studies have implicated metho-
`trexate-induced renal dysfunction and delayed drug
`clearance as a probable mechanism of toxicity,” and
`initial attempts to monitor drug levels in patients re-
`ceiving high-dose therapy have demonstrated de-
`layed drug clearance in toxic pattients.°-7 These con-
`siderations
`suggested that
`routine monitoring of
`methotrexate levels in plasma might permit early de-
`tection of patients at high risk of development of tox-
`icity. The following study substantiates the value of
`monitoring plasma methotrexate 48 hours after drug
`administration.
`
`Medac Exhibit 2055
`
`Koios Pharmaceuticals v. Medac
`
`IPR2016-01370
`
`Page 00001
`
`Medac Exhibit 2055
`Koios Pharmaceuticals v. Medac
`IPR2016-01370
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Vol. 297 No. 12
`
`METHOTREXATE PHARMACOKINETICS — STOLLER ET AL.
`
`I531
`
`MEIER!th AND METHODS
`
`Leucovorln Rescue
`
`From November, 1974, to january, 1977, 78 patients at the Na-
`tional Cancer Institute received 395 infusions of high-dose metho-
`trexate for treatment of metastatic tumors (38 patients) or as adju-
`vant therapy for osteogenic' sarcoma (40 patients). Their median
`age was 25 years, with a range of 10 to 70 years. Treatment proto-
`cols required that all patients receiving high-dose methotrcxate
`have a normal blood urea nitrogen [less than 25 mg per 100 ml) and
`normal serum creatinine {less than 1.2 mg per 100 ml) before each
`course of therapy. In addition, all patients had a white-cell count
`greater than 4000 cells per cubic millimeter and platelet count
`greater than 150,000 per cubic millimeter before treatment, except
`for Patient 3 {Table 1), who had a platelet count of l6,000 cells per
`cubic millimeter before treatment.
`Myelosuppression due to methotrexate was defined as a fall of the
`white-cell count to 2000 cells per cubic millimeter or less, or a fall in
`platelet count to 75.000 cells per cubic millimeter or lower. Drug-re-
`lated renal toxicity was defined as a 50 per cent or greater rise in se-
`rum creatinine. the peak value exceeding the normal limits of 1.2
`mg per l00 ml.
`
`Mothottexate tntuelon
`
`The regimen previously reported by Jaffe et al.‘ was used in this
`study. Methotrexate was supplied by Lederle Laboratories, Pearl
`River, New York, or Ben Venue Laboratories, Bedford. Ohio, and
`was administered in 500 to 1000 m1 of 5 per cent dextrose in water
`containing 25 meq of sodium bicarbonate.
`Methotrexate in doses of 50, 100, 150, 200, or 250 mg per kilo-
`gram was infused intravenously over a six-hour period. All patients
`received intravenous hydration with 3 liters of fluid per square me-
`ter per 2-1 hours and 80 meq of bicarbonate per square meter per
`24 hours. Hydration was begun 12 hours before and was continued
`for 36 hours after the start of the infusion. Urinary pH was tested
`before and periodically during the 24 hours after the start of the
`infusion. Methotrexate was not begun until the urinary pH was
`greater than or equal to ID, and additional intravenous bicarbo-
`nate was recommended if the urinary pH fell below 1.0 during in-
`fusion.
`
`Leucovorin, 15 mg per square meter, was given intravenously two
`hours after the completion of methotreitate infusion and was re-
`peated every six hours thereafter for a total of eight doses. At 48
`hours from the start of methotrexate infusion plasma samples were
`obtained for methotrexate determination. Plasma methotrexate
`concentrations were determined either by the dihydrofolate reduc-
`tase inhibition method using enzyme from either lactation?!” caret
`(New England Enzyme. Boston. Massachusetts) or from metho—
`trexate-resistant rnurine L1210 cells,’ or by the competitive pro-
`tein-binding assay. "‘ Both assays are highly specific for tight-bind-
`ing inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase and yield equivalent re-
`sults when tested against known standards or the same patient sam-
`ple. Pharmacokinetc data from the first 14 nontoxic infusions were
`used to initially define a normal range {mean :i:2 SD.) for 43-hour
`plasma methotrexate concentration. A normal 48-hour plasma
`methotrexate range was later established for each dose level ad-
`ministered on the basis of data from the first 189 nontoxic infu-
`sions. Patients whose 48-hour level fell within this normal range
`were discharged from the hospital, whereas those with levels more
`than 2 SD. above the mean received leucovorin for an additional 48
`hours. During the initial 18 months ofthis study, leucovorin dosage
`was 12 to 30 mg per square meter every six hours when additional
`rescue was given. In the final six months of the study, higher doses
`of supplemental leucovorin, 50 to 100 mg per square meter every six
`hours, were used.
`
`Rasrmrs
`
`Initial pharmacokinetic studies were performed in
`14 patients who received 50 to 250 mg per kilogram of
`methotrexate withOut subsequent toxicity. Peak drug
`levels were 0.l mM to 1.0 mM during the infusion pe-
`riod and declined thereafter in a biexponential curve
`with half-lives of two and 10.4 hours (Fig. 1). Plasma
`methotrexate concentrations were 3 X 10" M or less
`
`in all patients 48 hours after the infusion was begun.
`We suspected that toxic patients w0uld display pro-
`
`Table 1. Toxic Episodes Due to High-Dose Methotrexate (MTX).
`SEIUM CnEnTININE
`SUPPLEMENTAL Lrumvonm
`Toxlctrv'
`Recov Elv‘l
`
`herons
`m
`
`AFTER
`m
`
`wnmz-cset
`COUNT
`
`PLA'IELET
`coon-r
`
`ornsn
`
`mg! £00 in!
`
`mgltn’ffl fir
`
`0.8
`
`1.2
`
`0.9
`
`0.8
`
`0.7
`
`0.6
`
`1.3
`(96 hr)
`
`2.6
`{24 hr)
`1.5
`[24 hr)
`
`0.8
`(48 hr)
`
`1.0
`(24 hr)
`0.5
`(IIB hr)
`
`6 (day 2-22)
`
`30 (day 2—13]
`
`15 (day 5-1 l]
`
`20 (day 2—1?)
`
`15 (chi)r 2-5)
`
`2.200
`(day 6)
`
`[.700
`(day '1'}
`500
`(day 6)
`
`[.6113
`[day ‘1'}
`
`2.300
`(day 6)
`[.100
`[day 4)
`
`54.000
`(day 10}
`
`23,000
`(day 13)
`500
`[day 8)
`
`60.1110
`(day '1')
`
`[5.000
`(day l l)
`No fail
`
`Urinary-
`tract
`infection
`Severe
`mucositis
`Septicemia
`
`Rash.
`severe
`mucositis
`—
`
`—
`
`On day 12
`
`On day 1?
`
`Patient
`died on
`day i3
`On day 14
`
`011 day 23
`
`On day 5
`
`PATIENT
`No.
`
`Doss
`
`43-Hr.
`PLASMA
`M‘l‘x
`
`mgflcg
`
`Myelosupptession:
`l
`50
`
`2
`
`3
`
`d
`
`5
`
`6
`
`50
`
`100
`
`100
`
`100
`
`150
`
`11M
`
`1.4
`
`2| .0
`
`6.9
`
`1.4
`
`0.25
`(72 hr)
`0.96
`
`Renal toxicity with moderate leukopenia:
`«u
`—
`163.000
`3.200
`T5 (day 2-21)
`2.7
`'l
`50
`0.96
`[.1
`
`
`(day 7](‘8 hr) (day [0)
`
`'White-oeil count <2000 t:ells,irnn'tJ or piatelet count 43.0120 cellsfrnm’.
`YWhitooeil count >201} oellsfmm’, platelet count }15.000 colts/math a disappearance of muonsitis.
`
`Page 00002
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`632
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`Sept. 22, 1977
`
`quent toxicity. The toxic patients demonstrated mark-
`edly delayed drug excretion when additional metho-
`trexate levels were determined at 72 and 96 hours
`
`(Fig. 1); in contrast, the nontoxic patients all had rap-
`id clearance of the drug,.as verified by serial determi-
`nations.
`
`Secondly, dosage of leucovorin may have influ-
`enced toxicity in that the severely toxic patients (Pa-
`tients 1-6, Table 1) all received supplemental leuco-
`vorin in low doses (12 to 30 mg per square meter ev-
`ery six hours) whereas four of the nontoxic patients re-
`ceived larger doses of supplemental leucovorin (50 to
`100 mg per square meter every six hours). Further ev-
`idence for the effectiveness of large doses of leucovor-
`in was provided by the course of Patient 7 (Table 1).
`In this patient renal failure associated with markedly
`delayed methotrexate disappearance from plasma de-
`veloped; he received leucovorin, 75 mg per square me-
`ter every six hours for 19 days, and had moderate
`
`l
`__l
`o Toxic Infusions
`- Non-Toxic infusions
`
`
`
`.fi'.
`
`ii.
`iii.
`
`10‘9
`
`100
`
`150
`
`200
`
`250
`
`DOSE, MG/ KG
`
`Figure 2. Relation of Plasma Methotrexate (MTX) Level at 48
`Hours to Toxicity.
`The geometric mean values of nontoxic infusions are shown
`at each dose level, with brackets defining 2 S.D.
`
`Page 00003
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLASMA[MTX],M
`
`10'6
`
`10'7
`
`10‘8
`
`
` 0 Toxic Infusions
`
`' Non-Toxic Infusions
`
`104
`
`..O.or
`
`
`
`PLASMA[MTx],M 8 m
`
`10" t
`
`_J.—I_ l
`l
`7
`8
`9
`6
`TiME,DAYS
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`Figure 1. Plasma Methotrexate (MTX) Disappearance Curves
`in Patients Receiving Six-Hour Infusions, 50 to 250 Mg per
`Kilogram.
`The disappearance profile for 14 patients monitored serially
`over 72 hours who had no toxicity is defined by the striped
`area. Patients in whom evidence of myelosuppression devel-
`oped (Table 1) had plasma levels as shown by open circles.
`Six nontoxic patients with 48-hour levels above 0.9 uM had
`the plasma levels as shown by the solid circles.
`
`longed retention of methotrexate; therefore, plasma
`samples were routinely monitored 48 hours after the
`start of therapy in an effort to detect patients at high
`risk of toxicity.
`In 375 of 395 infusions, plasma methotrexate con-
`centrations at 48 hours fell within the normal range,
`as defined by the geometric mean :l:2 S.D. for the non-
`toxic patients in this series (Fig. 2). None of these in-
`fusions associated with normal 48-hour levels result—
`
`ed in myelosuppression, mucositis, or other toxicity.
`After seven infusions,
`the 48-hour plasma level ex-
`ceeded the normal range but was less than 9 X 10'7
`M; in each case, the patient received supplemental
`leucovorin, 15 mg per square meter every six hours for
`two days, and no patient manifested toxicity.
`Forty-eight-hour
`levels of methotrexate greater
`than 9 X 10—7 M were associated with a high fre-
`quency of toxicity. In five of 12 patients having 48-
`hour values above 9 X 10”7 M severe myelosuppres-
`sion developed (Table 1). An additional toxic episode
`occurred in a patient with high levels that were first
`detected at 72 hours after infusion (Patient 5, Table
`1).
`than
`levels greater
`Six patients with 48-hour
`9 X 10‘7 M did not show toxicity. Two factors distin-
`guished the toxic patients from patients having simi-
`larly elevated drug levels at 48 hours but no subse-
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`Vol. 29? No. 12
`
`METHOTREXATE PHARMACOKINETICS — STOLLER ET AL.
`
`633
`
`granuiocytopenia as the sole manifestation of drug
`tox1c1ty.
`Myelosuppression in the toxic patients continued
`for five to 23 days and, in two (Patients 2 and 4, Ta-
`ble 1), was accompanied by severe oral mucositis.
`Other toxic sequelae included a diffuse erythematous
`rash in Patient 4, a urinary-tract infection in Patient
`1, and gross hematuria followed by a fatal episode of
`septicemia in Patient 3.
`
`Value of Serum Creetlnlne in Predicting Metholrexate Tox-
`iclty
`
`jacobs et al.’ have shown in monkeys that. as a con—
`sequence of its limited solubility at acid pH, metho-
`trexate may precipitate in acid urine, causing renal
`tubular obstruction and delayed drug excretion. Pit-
`man et al.5 have proposed that serum creatinine in—
`crease of 50 per cent might be used to detect patients
`at high risk of development of toxicity after high-dose
`methotrexate.
`
`In the present study all patients had normal serum
`creatinine values before treatment. Post-infusion cre-
`
`atinine values, monitored at 24 or 48 haurs, did not
`change or increased less than 50 per cent in 383 of 395
`infusions. Despite the unchanged creatinine, three of
`these infusions were associated with myelosuppres-
`sion. An increase of more than 50 per cent in serum
`creatinine occurred after 12 infusions; in four cases
`the peak creatinine value exceeded normal limits, and
`each of these infusions was associated with myelosup-
`pression. In the other eight patients, despite the 50 per
`cent increase after treatment, the absolute creatinine
`value did not exceed normal (1.2 mg per 100 ml), and
`none of these patients became toxic. Thus, if one re-
`lied on the criterion of an increase in creatinine of
`
`more than 50 per cent to an abnormal peak value, it
`would have been possible to predict toxicity in only
`four of seven toxic patients.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The use of high-dose methotrexate infusions,H al-
`though of great interest in cancer therapy, poses the
`potential of life-threatening toxicity for the patient.
`The present study has demonstrated that monitor-
`ing of plasma methotrexate levels 48 hOurs after infu-
`sion can identify patients at high risk of toxicity. Six
`patients who experienced myelosuppression had lev-
`els at 43 hours higher than 9 X 10" M, and had
`markedly delayed excretion of drug thereafter. A sev-
`enth toxic patient had an elevated level at 72 hours
`and delayed drug disappearance. In contrast, no pa—
`tient having a level less than 9 X 10" M at 48 hours
`experienced subsequent toxicity. Six patients with 48-
`hour levels higher than 9 X 10" M did not show tox-
`icity. The avoidance of toxicity by these six patients
`could be explained by either the subsequent rapid fall
`off in drug levels in all six patients or the high-dose
`leucovorin that four of the six received.
`
`Other studies have suggested that an increase in se-
`rum creatinine may be useful as an early sign of im—
`
`in the present series, a
`pending toxicity.“ However,
`rise in creatinine to abnormal levels was observed in
`
`only four of seven toxic patients. This finding sug-
`gests that if precipitation of methotrexate in renal tu-
`bules underlies toxicity, serum creatinine measure-
`ments may not be sensitive enough to detect this func-
`tional impairment in all cases. Alternatively, other un-
`identified factors, such as individual differences in re-
`nal tubular function or drug metabolism, might ac-
`count for the delayed drug excretion and toxicity.
`The management of patients with elevatedmetho-
`trexate levels and at high risk of toxicity has not been
`resolved. The present study provides evidence that
`large doses of leuc0vorin may prevent tOxicity. In none
`of five patients who received more than 50 mg per
`square meter of leucovorin beginning at 48 hours did
`severe mucositis or myelosuppression develop. In fur-
`ther support of this possibility, one patient (Patient 7,
`Table 1), who had evidence of renal failure and mark-
`edly delayed drug excretion, experienced only mild
`leukopenia when supported with leucovorin, 75 mg
`per square meter every six hours for 21 days.
`In experimental systems, the concentration of leu-
`covorin required to prevent tOxicity increases in di-
`rect proportion to the concentration of methotrex-
`ate, ” but the specific levels required to cOunteract spe-
`cific methotrexate concentrations are not known. Be-
`cause rnethotrexate concentrations above 1 X 10‘“ M
`
`inhibit DNA synthesis in bone marrow and intestinal
`epitheliur‘n,12 it
`is reasonable to continue leucovorin
`rescue in toxic patients until plasma methotrexate
`falls below this level. Measures designed to accelerate
`removal of methotrexate,
`such as hemodialysis,”
`charcoal filtration" or enzymatic cleavage,“ might
`have considerable value in patients with abnormal re-
`nal function, but have not been carefully evaluated in
`man as yet.
`,
`The foregoing results demonstrate the value of
`monitoring plasma methotrexate levels during high-
`dose chemotherapy. The specific correlates of toxic-
`ity, including critical plasma levels and duration of ex-
`posure, will probably differ from regimens employing
`other
`schedules of methotrexate administration.
`
`is clear that determinations of drug
`Nonetheless, it
`levels will be of value for identifying patients at high
`risk after methotrexate therapy.
`'
`
`REFERENCES
`
`2.
`
`4.
`
`1. Djerassi I. Farher S. Abir E. _et a1: Continuous infusion of methotrex-
`ate in children with acute leukemia. Cancer 20:233-242. 1967
`Jal'l'e N. Paed D: Recent advances in the chemotherapy of metastatic
`osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer 30116211631. 19’12
`3. Djersssi I, Rominger C], Kim 15, et a]: Phase 1 study of high doses of
`methotrexate with citrovorurn factor in patients with lung cancer. Carl-
`eer 30:22-30, 1912
`.laer N, Frei E III, Traggis D, et a]: Adjnvant methotrexate and citro-
`vorum-factor treatment ofostcogenic sarcoma. N Engl J Med 291:994-
`99?. WM
`5. Von Hoff DD. Pent: JS. Helman LJ. el al: The incidence of drug relat-
`ed deaths secondary to high dose methotrexate and eitrovorum factor
`administration. Cancer Treat Rep 61:145-748.
`I91?
`6. Stoller RG, iacobs SA, Drake JC. et a]: Pharmacokinctics of high-dose
`methotrexate (NSC-T40). Cancer Chemother Rep 6:19-24. 1915
`'1'. Jacobs SA. Stoller RG. Chabner BA. et a1: T-Hydroxymethotresatc as a
`
`Page 00004
`
`Page 00004
`
`

`

`
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND jOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`Sept. 22, 1977
`
`Iurinary metabolite in human subjects and rhesus monkeys reaching
`high dose methotresate. J Clin Invest 51:534-538. 1976
`8. Pitman SW. Parker LM. Tattersall MH. et al: Clinical trial of high-dose
`methotrexate {NSC-74D} with citrovorum factor (NSC-3590): toxico-
`logic and therapeutic observations. Cancer Chemother Rep 6:43-49,
`I975
`9. Berrino JR. Fischer CEA: Techniques for study of resistance to folic ac-
`id antagonists. Methods Med Res l0:297-307. 1964
`it]. Myers CE, Lippman M. Eliot HM, et at: Competitive protein binding
`assay for methotreitate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 'i'l:3683-3686. [91‘s
`ll. Pinedo l-IM. Zaherko 05. Bull JM. el al: The reversal of methotrexate
`
`cytotoxicity to mouse bone marrow cells by leucovorin and nucleo-
`sides. Cancer Res 36:4413-4424,
`[91"6
`I2. Chabner BA. Young RC: Threshold methotreitate concentration for in
`win inhibition of DNA synthesis in normal and tumorous target tis-
`sues. J Clin Invest 521804481], 19?]
`IS. Djerassi
`l. Ciesieika W. Kim .iS: Removal of melhotrexate by filtra-
`tion-absorption using charcoal filters or by hemodialysis. Cancer Treat
`Rep 61:751-752. I???
`14. Chabner BA. Johns DCI, Bertino JR: Enzymatic cleavage of metho-
`trexate provides a method for prevention of drug toxicity. Nature
`239:395-397. I972
`
`AUTOIM M UNE VITILIGO
`
`Detection of Antibodies to Melanin-Producing Cells
`
`KENNETH C. HERTZ, M.D., LAURA A. GAZZE, A.B., CHARLES H. KIRKPATRICK, M.D.,
`AND STEPHEN I. KA'rz, M.D., PHD.
`
`Abstract Vitiiigo, a disorder characterized by the de-
`struction of melanocytes. is often associated with dis-
`eases in which there are increased frequencies of au-
`toantibodies.‘ For this reason we investigated two pa-
`tients with vitiligo. alopecia universalis. mucocutane—
`ous candidiasis. and multiple endocrine insufficien-
`cies for antibodies to melanin-producing cells. Using
`direct
`immunoiiuorescence of normal and vitiligl-
`nous skin from both patients and indirect immunoilu-
`orescence with both patients‘ serum. we could not de-
`tect these antibodies. However. an immunofluores-
`
`cent complement-fixation test demonstrated a circu-
`lating antibody that bound to melanocytes In human
`skin. nevus cells and melanoma cells. Specificity of
`cellular fluorescence tor nevus and melanoma cells
`was shown on serial sections stained with hematoxy—
`Iin and eosin and was inferred for melanocytes from
`their distribution in human skin and their presence
`when the normal but not vitiliginous skin of both pa-
`tients was used as substrate. This antibody was char—
`acterized as an lgG that activated complement via the
`classical pathway. (N Eng! J Med 297:634—637, 1977)
`
`VITILIGO, a disease characterized by the loss of
`melanin pigment that follows the destruction of
`meianocytes, has been associated with hyperthyroid-
`ism, hypothyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, perni-
`cious anemia, diabetes mellitus, mucocutaneous can-
`didiasis and aiopecia areata. In addition to numerous
`case reports relating its occurrence with one or sever-
`al of these disorders,” larger studies have confirmed
`these assOciations.“' While the clinical associa-
`
`tions of vitiligo have led some to consider it a cutane-
`ous marker for internal disease,12 the presence of thy—
`roid, adrenal and gastric parietal-cell antibodies in
`many patients with both vitiligo and endocrine dis-
`ease has suggested a common, perhaps autoimmune,
`origin.'-’i‘-” The autoimmune theory of vitiligo is fur—
`ther strengthened by the increased prevalence of or-
`gan-specific autoantibodies in several,“”‘*5 but not
`all,“ large series of patients with vitiligo.
`To date, an antimelanocyte antibody in the serum
`of patients with vitiligo has not been found." In the
`two patients with vitiligo, alopecia universalis, muco-
`cutaneous candidiasis and multiple endocrine insuffi-
`ciencies described below, we demonstrated a circu-
`lating antibody to melanocytes, nevus cells and mela-
`noma cells. The antibody is identified by its comple-
`ment-fixing ability and has been characterized as an
`IgG.
`
`From the Dermatology Branch. National Cancer Institute, and the Labo-
`ratory of Clinical Investigation. National Institute ofAllergy and Infectious
`Diseases. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda. MD (address reprint re-
`quests to Dr. Hertz at the Department of Dermatology. University of Mia-
`mi School of Medicine. P.O. Box. 5208?5. Biscayne Annex. Miami. FL
`33152}.
`
`CLINICAL SUMMARIES
`
`CASE 1. A 34~year-old woman has had widespread candidiasis
`and total alopecia since the age of six. Hypoparathyroidism had
`been diagnosed at nine years of age, and the evaluation of an un-
`steady gait had led to the recognition of pernicious anemia at the
`age of 13. Her first menstrual period had occurred at the age of 15,
`but subsequent periods were infrequent, leading to the diagnosis of
`primary ovarian failure. Vitiligo began at the age onB and has been
`progressive; the most striking areas of involvement have been the
`face and extremities. Hypoadrenalism was diagnosed during her
`initial admission to the National Institutes of Health at the age of
`34.
`
`CASE 2. An 13-year-old woman has had candidiasis of her nails.
`total alopecia and vitiligo since three years of age. hypoparathy-
`roidism since six and hypoadrenalism since 10. Primary ovarian
`failure was diagnosed at the age of 16; approximately 50 per cent of
`her skin was vitiliginous at that time.
`
`Both patients have had extensive immunologic evaluations dis-
`closing impaired cellular immunity to Candida clbr'cnrrs in vivo and in
`vitro. Serum autoantibody studies showed Case 1 to have thyroid
`complement-fixing and adrenal antibodies but no thyroid-aggluti-
`nating or gastric parietal-cell antibodies. Case 2 had adrenal, gas-
`tric parietal-cell and ovarian antibodies.
`
`Mes-none
`
`Immunofluorcscent staining was performed
`Immunafluoreuence.
`with Previously described procedures and reagents." We examined
`biopsies of normal. vitiliginous, and border skin from both patients
`by direct immunofluorescence for in vivo bound IgG, IgA, IgM. lgE
`or C3. Serum samples from both patients were studied by conven-
`tional indirect immunofluorescence for the presence of circulating
`antibodies {lgCL lgA, IgM or IgE) and by an immunofluorescent
`complement—fixation te5t for circulating complement-binding fac-
`tors capable of reacting with melanin-producing cells in normal or
`neoplastic tissue. The complement-fixation test is a multistep pro-
`cedure involving sequential incubation of frozen sections of sub-
`strate with test serum, fresh human serum or guinea-pig serum as a
`
`
`
`
`Page 00005
`
`Page 00005
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket