throbber
FROM THE ANALYST’S COUCH
`Rheumatoid arthritis market
`Claire Mount and James Featherstone
`
`In patients who suffer from rheumatoid
`arthritis (RA), the body, for unknown reasons,
`directs a hostile autoimmune response against
`joint cavities, which results in progressive,
`painful destruction of joint tissues. World-
`wide, approximately 1–2% of the population
`is thought to be affected by RA, and one in
`three patients is likely to become severely
`disabled within 20 years. Onset often occurs
`between the ages of 25 and 50 years and is
`three times more prevalent in women than
`men. There are currently three major product
`classes being used for the treatment of RA that
`offer significant clinical and quality-of-life
`improvements for sufferers.
`
`Treatment trends
`Early therapeutics treated the symptoms of the
`disease and maintained the patient’s quality of
`life, and were generally non-steroidal anti-
`inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as aspirin,
`naproxen and the cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2)
`inhibitors, all of which reduce pain and inflam-
`mation. However, the recent high profile volun-
`tary withdrawal of Merck's COX2 inhibitor
`Vioxx, due to the increased risk of cardiovasu-
`lar events, and the temporary withdrawal of
`Novartis’ Prexige, casts a shadow over the entire
`COX2 inhibitor class. Steroids were often used
`in conjunction with NSAIDs to further reduce
`inflammation, and this combination offered
`the most potent short-term anti-inflammatory
`activity. However, clinical benefit seems to
`diminish over time, which is problematic given
`the chronic nature of RA.
`During the past 20 years, the poor prognosis
`for chronic RA sufferers has spurred a more
`aggressive approach to the treatment of RA,
`and has led to the development of disease-
`modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS)
`that attempt to halt disease progression. The
`most popular DMARD is methotrexate, origi-
`nally used in the treatment of cancer, and
`others include gold salts, antimalarials, sulpha-
`salazine, tetracyclines and cyclosporine. These
`are generic products and together consistently
`generate approximately US $600 million per
`year in sales. Evidence of early structural dam-
`age in RA has lead to a shift in the treatment
`paradigm, and physicians now prescribe
`DMARDs at disease onset; moderate-to-severe
`RA suffers are given NSAIDs, corticosteroids
`and DMARDs concurrently.
`
`Although methotrexate is effective in the
`majority of RA patients, many cannot tolerate
`the side effects of the drug, and roughly 50%
`of patients eventually fail treatment, subse-
`quently becoming eligible for more recent treat-
`ment innovations, such as biologic response
`modifiers. Leflunomide (Arava; Aventis) was
`launched in 1998, and was the first drug specif-
`ically approved for RA in more than a decade.
`Leflunomide is similar in mechanism and
`side effects to methotrexate and is used as a
`second-line agent in patients that have failed
`methotrexate therapy.
`The most successful of the novel RA thera-
`pies are the tumour-necrosis factor-α (TNFα)
`inhibitors such as etanercept (Enbrel; Amgen),
`infliximab (Remicade; J&J/Centocor) and adal-
`imumab (Humira; Abbott). Overall, TNFα
`inhibitors generated more than US $4 billion in
`sales in 2003, and growth in excess of 30% in
`2004 is expected. The market is projected at US
`$7 billion by 2007, as approximately 30% of the
`moderate-to-severe patient population will be
`receiving anti-TNF therapy, with increasing
`penetration in mild-to-moderate patients.
`Amgen’s second biologic RA treatment,
`anakinra (Kineret), an interleukin-1 receptor
`antagonist (IL-1ra), was approved for the treat-
`ment of RA in 2001, although uptake has been
`
`Rural Africa 0.0026% Japan 0.2%
`China 0.3%
`Italy 0.33%
`Spain 0.5%
`Norway 0.5%
`Sweden 0.5%
`France 0.53%
`Finland 0.8%
`United Kingdom 0.81%
`USA 1.0%
`
`Figure 1 | Population prevalence. The prevalence
`of rheumatoid arthritis is relatively constant in many
`populations at between 0.5 and 1%. There are,
`however, exceptions, indicating the need for further
`elucidation of both genetic and environmental risk
`factors and their interactions.
`
`N E W S & A N A L Y S I S
`
`‘Cub’, courtesy of Daniel Michalik, danielmichalik@mac.com
`Photographer, Mark Johnston. All work is 100% recycled cork
`
`slow due to inferior efficacy compared with
`anti-TNFα therapies. Kineret is generally
`restricted to use in the 30–40% of cases in
`which patients fail to respond to anti-TNFα
`therapies and is then given as a monotherapy
`or in combination with methotrexate or other
`non-TNF-targeting DMARDs.
`
`What’s in the pipeline?
`The RA market is set to become more competi-
`tive in the medium term with the introduction
`of a number of drugs based on new mecha-
`nisms of action that have potential advantages
`over existing TNFα inhibitors, including
`longer half-lives and reduced dosing schedules.
`The most advanced pipeline products are
`new-generation TNFα inhibitors such as
`UCB/Celltech’s CDP-870 pegylated TNFα anti-
`body fragment, and Biogen Idec/Genentech/
`Roche’s MabThera/Rituxan, which is currently
`approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s
`lymphoma. CDP-870 is produced in Eschericha
`coli, which reduces the cost of goods to approxi-
`mately one-quarter of that of the other TNFα
`drugs, and MabThera has a highly differentiated
`dosing regime that could reduce the cost of
`treatment to less than half that of existing bio-
`logic therapies, which is currently upwards of
`US $10,000 per patient per year.
`Other development programmes include
`Roche’s atlizumab (Actemra) treatment, a
`humanized anti-IL-6 receptor antibody; Bristol-
`Myers Squibb’s CTLA4Ig (Abatacept), a soluble
`immunosuppressant antibody that is the first
`in a new class of co-stimulation blockers; and
`BMS’s 561392 (DPC 333), a TNFα-converting
`enzyme inhibitor which, based on its mecha-
`nism of action, has the added advantage of
`being orally available.
`In the longer-term, small-molecule inhibi-
`tors of proteases and enzymes will begin to
`emerge as RA treatments. Examples include
`Angiotech Pharma’s protease inhibitor Paxceed;
`Wyeth’s cell-cycle inhibitor CCI-779; J&J’s
`(Scios) p38 MAPK inhibitor SCIO-469; and
`AtheroGenics TNF-response-genes modulator
`AGIX-4207. These products could be comple-
`mentary to anti-TNFs or target refractory
`patients, and be easier to administer. Other
`key areas of interest include further anti-TNF
`agents, novel cytokines, angiogenic molecules,
`cell adhesion molecules and IL-1β-converting
`enzyme inhibitors.
`
`▲
`
`NATURE REVIEWS | DRUG DISCOVERY
`
`VOLUME 4 | JANUARY 2005 | 1 1
`
`Medac Exhibit 2046
`Koios Pharmaceuticals v. Medac
`IPR2016-01370
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`N E W S & A N A L Y S I S
`
`RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS MARKET | MARKET INDICATORS
`
`Table 1 | Performance of key marketed brands and products 2003/2008*
`Key products
`2003
`2008‡
`Marketed brands
`Arava
`Enbrel (Amgen)
`Enbrel (Wyeth)
`Remicade (Johnson & Johnson)
`Remicade (Schering-Plough)
`Kineret
`Humira
`Remicade (Tanabe)
`Development products
`CTLA4-Ig (Abatacept)
`CDP870
`*Figures in US $ millions. ‡Estimated.
`
`287
`1,300
`299
`1,169
`378
`68
`280
`2
`
`0
`0
`
`385
`2,808
`545
`2,068
`815
`150
`2,537
`66
`
`340
`225
`
`Rituxan
`
`Antibody against CD20
`
`Phase III Genentech/
`Roche/
`Biogen Idec
`
`Table 2 | Selected rheumatoid arthritis (RA) products in clinical trials
`Product
`Target/mechanism
`Status Company
`Comments
`Abatacept
`Inhibits T-cell activation
`Phase III Bristol-Myers
`First in new class of co-
`Squibb
`stimulation modulators;
`also being (CTLA4Ig)
`tested in combination
`with Enbrel
`Currently used in
`treatment of B-cell
`lymphoma; for patients
`refractory to other
`DMARDs; IV infusion
`every 12 weeks
`IL-6 significantly
`increased in RA
`Once per month dosing
`due to longer half-life;
`cheaper manufacturing
`
`R1569/MRA
`
`CDP-870
`
`Antibody against IL-6
`receptor
`Antibody against TNF
`
`Phase III Roche/Chugai
`
`Phase III Celltech/UCB
`
`Pegsunercept Pegylated TNF receptor
`type I
`Antibody against IL-15
`
`AMG 714/
`HuMax-IL15
`Paxceed
`
`SCIO-469
`
`Phase II Amgen
`
`Phase II
`
`Phase II
`
`ISIS
`
`Phase II Amgen/
`Genmab
`Small-molecule protease Phase II Angiotech
`inhibitor
`Pharma
`Small molecule p38
`J&J (Scios)
`MAPK inhibitor
`ISIS 104838 Antisense molecule
`against TNFα
`Antibody against
`vitronectin receptor
`
`Vitaxin
`
`Phase II MedImmune
`
`Oral administration
`
`In patients with
`suboptimal response to
`other drugs
`Oral administration
`
`▲
`
`The treatment of RA is dominated in volume by
`older, generic drugs, but the market for new
`biologics is growing rapidly (FIG. 2). Indeed, with
`roughly 165 million sufferers worldwide, and
`given that only an estimated 15% of US patients
`with RA are currently being treated with bio-
`logics, the market has tremendous potential for
`growth.Although penetration of the anti-TNFs
`is likely to increase in the near-term, growth of
`this class should ultimately begin to tail off,
`particularly following the approval of the non-
`TNF-targeted competitors including MabThera
`and MRA; in addition, novel drug targets are set
`to influence the future of RA treatment in the
`next decade (TABLE 1). New product classes have
`made significant improvements to the treat-
`ment of RA and promising developmental
`candidates have led to much optimism sur-
`rounding the chance to control disease pro-
`gression (TABLE 2). With significant unmet
`clinical need, there is room for further growth
`in the RA market. The current growth potential
`2003–2008 is predicted to be a 12% increase,
`with a market size of US $10 billion by 2008.
`
`Claire Mount and James Featherstone are
`Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology Consultants
`at Wood Mackenzie, 5th Floor, Tower 42,
`Old Broad Street, London EC2N 1HN, UK.
`e-mail: claire.mount@woodmac.com
`doi:10.1038/nrd1611
`
`Online links
`
`FURTHER INFORMATION
`The Arthritis foundation: http://www.arthritis.org
`National Institutes of Health: http://www.nih.gov/
`National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society:
`http://www.rheumatoid.org.uk/
`Access to this interactive links box is free online.
`
`10,469
`
`9,320
`
`8,121
`
`6,906
`
`5,537
`
`4,370
`
`3,018
`
`2,441
`
`1,844
`
`1,559
`
`13
`
`12
`
`11
`
`10
`
`0123456789
`
`Sales (US $ millions)
`
`1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
`Figure 2 | Forecast growth rates for the
`rheumatoid arthritis (RA) market. 2003–2008
`forecast compound annual growth rate = 24.4%.
`The RA market is expected to expand rapidly, driven
`by technological advances, increased competition
`and significant unmet need.
`
`AGIX-4207
`
`Antegren
`
`CCI-779
`
`Humira
`
`Phase II Atherogenics
`
`Phase II Elan/Biogen Idec
`
`Small molecule that
`modulates TNF-
`response genes
`Antibody against
`adhesion molecules
`Small-molecule cell-cycle Phase II Wyeth
`inhibitor
`Antibody against TNF
`
`Developed for Japanese
`market by Eisai
`DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; IL, interleukin; IV, intravenous; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
`kinase; TNF, tumour-necrosis factor.
`
`Phase II Eisai/Abbott
`
`12 | JANUARY 2005 | VOLUME 4
`
`www.nature.com/reviews/drugdisc
`
`Page 00002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket