throbber
Joint Bone Spine 73 (2006) 388–395
`
`Original article
`
`http://france.elsevier.com/direct/BONSOI/
`
`Methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis:
`clinical practice guidelines based on published evidence and expert opinion ☆
`
`Stephan Pavy a, Arnaud Constantin b, Thao Pham c, Laure Gossec d, Jean-Francis Maillefert e,
`Alain Cantagrel b, Bernard Combe f, René-Marc Flipo g, Philippe Goupille h, Xavier Le Loët i,
`Xavier Mariette j, Xavier Puéchal k, Thierry Schaeverbeke l, Jean Sibilia m, Jacques Tebib n,
`Daniel Wendling o, Maxime Dougados d,*
`
`a Service de rhumatologie A, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
`b Service de rhumatologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
`c Service de rhumatologie, CHU de la Conception, Marseille, France
`d Service de rhumatologie B, CHU Cochin, 27, rue du Faubourg, Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
`e Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France
`f Service d’immunorhumatologie, CHU Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
`g Service de rhumatologie, CHRU Roger-Salengro, Lille, France
`h Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Trousseau, Tours, France
`i Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Bois-Guillaume, Rouen, France
`j Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
`k Service de rhumatologie, centre hospitalier, Le Mans, France
`l Service de rhumatologie, CHU Pellegrin–Tripode, Bordeaux, France
`m Service de rhumatologie, CHU Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
`n Service de rhumatologie, CHU Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
`o Service de rhumatologie, CHU Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France
`
`Received 5 January 2006; accepted 25 January 2006
`Available online 23 March 2006
`
`Abstract
`
`Objectives: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based ap-
`proach and expert opinion.
`Methods: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing recommendations.
`Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the Cochrane databases, PubMed, and proceedings of meetings of the French
`Society for Rheumatology, European League Against Rheumatism, and American College of Rheumatology. Using this evidence, a group of
`rheumatologists developed and validated the recommendations. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and the extent of agreement
`among experts were specified.
`Results: The recommendations were as follows: 1: The starting dosage for methotrexate in patients with RA should not be less than 10 mg/
`week and should be determined based on disease severity and patient-related factors; 2: When a patient with RA shows an inadequate response to
`methotrexate, the dosage should be increased at intervals of 6 weeks, up to 20 mg/week, according to tolerance and patient-related factors; 3:
`When starting methotrexate treatment in a patient with RA, preference should be given to the oral route. A switch to the intramuscular or
`subcutaneous route should be considered in patients with poor compliance, inadequate effectiveness, or gastrointestinal side effects; 4: At present,
`there is no evidence indicating that a change in methotrexate dosage is in order when a TNF antagonist is given concomitantly; 5: The investiga-
`tions that are mandatory before starting methotrexate therapy in a patient with RA consist of a full blood cell count, serum transaminase levels,
`serum creatinine with computation of creatinine clearance, and a chest radiograph. In addition, serological tests for the hepatitis viruses B and C
`
`☆ This project was supported by a grant from Abbott France.
`* Corresponding author.
`E-mail address: maxime.dougados@cch.ap-hop-paris.fr (M. Dougados).
`
`1297-319X/$ - see front matter © 2006 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.01.007
`
`Medac Exhibit 2029
`Koios Pharmaceuticals v. Medac
`IPR2016-01370
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`S. Pavy et al. / Joint Bone Spine 73 (2006) 388–395
`
`389
`
`and a serum albumin assay are recommended. In patients with a history of respiratory disease or current respiratory symptoms, lung function tests
`with determination of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide are recommended; 6: Investigations that are mandatory for monitoring metho-
`trexate therapy in patients with RA consist of full blood cell counts and serum transaminase and creatinine assays. These tests should be obtained
`at least once a month for the first 3 months then every 4–12 weeks; 7: Folate supplementation can be given routinely to patients treated with
`methotrexate for RA. In practice, a minimal dosage of 5 mg of folic acid once a week, at a distance from the methotrexate dose, is appropriate; 8:
`In the event of respiratory symptoms possibly related to methotrexate toxicity, the drug must be stopped and symptom severity evaluated. Should
`evidence of serious disease be found, the patient should be admitted immediately or advice from a pulmonologist should be obtained immedi-
`ately.
`Conclusion: Recommendations about methotrexate therapy for RA were developed. These recommendations should help to improve practice
`uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.
`© 2006 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis; Methotrexate; Recommendations
`
`1. Introduction
`
`2.2. Selection of questions
`
`Methotrexate is used by most rheumatologists as the first-
`line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug for patients with
`rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This choice rests on the good effec-
`tiveness and safety profile of the drug, its low cost, and the
`availability of long-term follow-up data on RA patients given
`methotrexate [1,2]. In addition, recent data indicate that meth-
`otrexate can produce substantial survival benefits by reducing
`cardiovascular mortality in patients with RA [3].
`However, 20 years after the first randomized controlled
`trials (RCTs) demonstrated that methotrexate as monotherapy
`was effective in decreasing disease activity in RA [4,5],
`15 years after the first RCTs established its ability to slow
`the progression of structural joint damage [6,7], and nearly
`10 years after the first RCTs of the efficacy and safety of meth-
`otrexate combined with other conventional disease-modifying
`antirheumatic drugs [8,9] or biotherapies [10–12], considerable
`variability continues to exist in the modalities of methotrexate
`use in RA, most notably regarding starting and maximal do-
`sages, dosage adjustment, criteria used to monitor patients in
`daily practice, and the use of folate supplementation.
`The objective of this work was to develop clinical practice
`guidelines for the use of methotrexate in patients with RA,
`using evidence from the international literature and expert opi-
`nion, with the goal of optimizing everyday clinical practice
`[13].
`
`2. Methods
`
`The procedure for developing the recommendations in-
`volved several steps, as detailed in the article by Pham et al.
`[14,15].
`
`2.1. Selection of topics by the scientific committee members
`
`The scientific committee selected three topics: cardiovascu-
`lar risk and RA [15], use of methotrexate in RA, and nonphar-
`macological management of patients with recent-onset RA
`[16]. The use of methotrexate in RA is discussed in this article.
`
`Five questions were selected using a Delphi prioritization
`procedure:
`
`1. What dosages and routes of administration should be used:
`more specifically, what is the optimal starting dose, how
`and when should the dosage be adjusted, what is the max-
`imal dosage, and which routes of administration should be
`used and when?
`2. Does the methotrexate dosage deserve special consideration
`in patients who are also receiving TNFα antagonist therapy?
`3. What
`investigations (including pulmonary investigations)
`should be performed before starting, and during, low-dose
`methotrexate treatment in patients with RA?
`4. Should folate supplementation be given routinely (product,
`dosage, frequency, expected benefit).
`5. What is the optimal management strategy when respiratory
`symptoms develop in an RA patient taking methotrexate?
`
`2.3. Literature review
`
`We searched the Cochrane databases, PubMed, and the da-
`tabases of the meetings of the French Society for Rheumatol-
`ogy (2003 and 2004), European League Against Rheumatism
`(2003, 2004, and 2005), and American College of Rheumatol-
`ogy (2003 and 2004). Articles published in French or in Eng-
`lish before June 2005 were considered. The keywords rheuma-
`toid arthritis and methotrexate were used in combination with
`other keywords: dosage,
`intramuscular, subcutaneous, and
`parenteral for question 1; adalimumab, etanercept, and inflix-
`imab for question 2; monitoring, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C
`virus, hematologic diseases, renal function, respiratory tract
`diseases, and pneumonitis for questions 3 and 5; and folic acid
`and folinic acid for question 4.
`Of the 1859 publications retrieved by the literature search,
`764 were selected based on the titles, and of those 285 based
`on the abstracts. The full texts of relevant publications were
`reviewed. The level of evidence in each publication was deter-
`mined as recommended by Shekelle et al. [17].
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`390
`
`S. Pavy et al. / Joint Bone Spine 73 (2006) 388–395
`
`The procedure used to select the experts, to present the lit-
`erature review results to them and to develop and evaluate the
`recommendations are detailed in the article by Pham et al. [15].
`
`3. Results and discussion
`
`Eight recommendations about using methotrexate in patients
`with RA were developed during the 2005 Meeting of Rheuma-
`tology Experts. The wording and strength of the recommenda-
`tions are shown in Table 1, as well as the extent of agreement
`of the experts with each recommendation.
`
`3.1. The starting dosage for methotrexate in patients with RA
`should not be less than 10 mg/week and should be determined
`based on disease severity and patient-related factors
`
`The therapeutic effectiveness of methotrexate is dose-depen-
`dent, and effects have been reported with a dosage as low as
`5 mg/week [18]. Nevertheless, the first RCTs of methotrexate
`versus placebo showed that a starting dosage of 7.5 mg/week
`was often inadequately effective, requiring a dosage increase
`after 6 weeks in 66–97% of cases [4,5]. In addition, a starting
`dosage of 10 mg/m2 per week (12.5–20 mg/week) was more
`effective than 5 mg/m2 per week (5–7.5 mg/week), with no
`
`statistically significant safety differences between the two
`groups [19]. Based on these data and on their experience with
`methotrexate used to treat RA, the experts recommended a
`starting dosage of at least 10 mg/week.
`The experts agreed that the starting dosage should be ad-
`justed according to the patient’s body weight and co-morbid-
`ities. Moderate to severe renal failure usually requires a starting
`dosage below 10 mg/week. Two pharmacokinetic studies
`showed that methotrexate clearance was correlated with creati-
`nine clearance [20,21]. In patients whose creatinine clearance
`was lower than 45 ml/min, serum methotrexate levels were 30–
`60% higher than in patients with normal renal function. A
`meta-analysis of 11 controlled trials showed that moderate re-
`nal failure (creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min) significantly in-
`creased the risk of serious methotrexate toxicity, most notably
`for the lung and liver [22]. Other co-morbidities may require a
`starting dosage of less than 10 mg/week; a history of drug-in-
`duced hepatitis is an example.
`Several experts underlined the need to consider body weight
`when selecting the starting dosage. We are not aware of any
`clinical studies in which methotrexate dosages are reported in
`mg/kg body weight. The article by Furst et al. [19] is the only
`study that used a relative methotrexate dosage, in mg/m2 per
`week, which can be difficult to compute in everyday rheuma-
`tological practice. Given this lack of scientific data, the recom-
`
`Table 1
`The eight recommendations about methotrexate used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, with the strength of each recommendation and the degree of agreement among
`experts at the 2005 Rheumatology Expert Panel meetings [17]
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`The starting dosage for methotrexate in patients with RA should not be less than
`10 mg/week and should be determined based on disease severity and patient-related
`factors.
`When a patient with RA shows an inadequate response to methotrexate, the dosage
`should be increased at intervals of 6 weeks, up to 20 mg/week, according to tolerance
`and patient-related factors.
`When starting methotrexate treatment in a patient with RA, preference should be given
`to the oral route. A switch to the intramuscular or subcutaneous route should be con-
`sidered in patients with poor compliance, inadequate effectiveness, or gastrointestinal
`side effects.
`At present, there is no evidence indicating that a change in methotrexate dosage is in
`order when a TNF antagonist is given concomitantly.
`The investigations that are mandatory before starting methotrexate therapy in a patient
`with RA consist of a full blood cell count, serum transaminase levels, serum creatinine
`with computation of creatinine clearance, and a chest radiograph. In addition, serolo-
`gical tests for the hepatitis viruses B and C and a serum albumin assay are recom-
`mended. In patients with a history of respiratory disease or current respiratory symp-
`toms, lung function tests with determination of the diffusing capacity for carbon
`monoxide are recommended.
`Investigations that are mandatory for monitoring methotrexate therapy in patients with
`RA consist of full blood cell counts and serum transaminase and creatinine assays.
`These tests should be obtained at least once a month for the first 3 months then every
`4–12 weeks.
`Folate supplementation can be given routinely to patients treated with methotrexate for
`RA. In practice, a minimal dosage of 5 mg of folic acid once a week, at a distance
`from the methotrexate dose, is appropriate.
`In the event of respiratory symptoms possibly related to methotrexate toxicity, the drug
`must be stopped and symptom severity evaluated. Should evidence of serious disease
`be found, the patient should be admitted immediately or advice from a pulmonologist
`should be obtained immediately.
`* percentage of “agrees completely” and “agrees with reservation” votes.
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Level of
`evidence
`1b/2
`
`Strength of the
`recommendation
`C
`
`Agreement among
`experts (%)*
`82.5
`
`1b/2
`
`2/3
`
`–
`
`1b/3
`
`3
`
`1a/1b
`
`2/3
`
`C
`
`D
`
`–
`
`D
`
`D
`
`A
`
`D
`
`88.8
`
`91.7
`
`–
`
`73.4
`
`88.1
`
`88.5
`
`80.4
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`S. Pavy et al. / Joint Bone Spine 73 (2006) 388–395
`
`391
`
`mendation states the methotrexate starting dosage as a minimal
`total dosage. However, in overweight patients, a starting do-
`sage close to the maximum recommended dosage can be used.
`The presence of characteristics suggesting particularly severe
`disease [14] may warrant the use of a starting dosage greater
`than 10 mg/week in order to rapidly induce the maximum treat-
`ment response, despite the risk of minor side effects [1].
`
`3.2. When a patient with RA shows an inadequate response
`to methotrexate, the dosage should be increased at intervals
`of 6 weeks, up to 20 mg/week, according to tolerance
`and patient-related factors
`
`A single RCT investigated the additional efficacy obtained
`by increasing the methotrexate dosage above 15 mg/week in
`patients with RA [23]. Fifty-four patients with an inadequate
`response to oral methotrexate in a dosage of 15–20 mg/week
`were divided into two groups: the controls received 15 mg/
`week of methotrexate intramuscularly and the intensive treat-
`ment group had their intramuscular methotrexate dosage in-
`creased every 4 weeks as long as the DAS28 was greater than
`3.2, up to 45 mg/week. At the end of the trial, no significant
`differences were found between the two groups regarding dis-
`ease activity or the number of patients whose DAS28 was less
`than 3.2. One of the RCTs vs. placebo was started with three
`methotrexate dosages, 5, 10, and 20 mg/m2 per week [19].
`With the highest dosage, which resulted in administration of
`25–35 mg of methotrexate per week, one third of patients dis-
`continued methotrexate therapy prematurely because of serious
`adverse events, and recruitment to this group was stopped.
`The mean relative bioavailability of oral methotrexate com-
`pared to intramuscular methotrexate varies from 0.64 to 0.85
`according to the dosage [24,25]. Based on this fact and on their
`own experience, the experts decided to recommend 20 mg/
`week as the maximal dosage. Good tolerance of methotrexate
`in its current dosage is a prerequisite to a dosage increase.
`For the reasons listed in the previous recommendation, in-
`creasing the methotrexate dosage above 20 mg/week may be
`appropriate in severely overweight or obese patients. The ex-
`perts recommended a 6-week interval between dosage incre-
`ments for inadequate effectiveness. This interval is warranted
`by the active nature of the disease. It is consistent with the
`recommendation about clinical and laboratory test monitoring
`developed at the 2004 Meeting of Rheumatology Experts [14].
`
`3.3. When starting methotrexate treatment in a patient with
`RA, preference should be given to the oral route
`
`A switch to the intramuscular or subcutaneous route should
`be considered in patients with poor compliance, inadequate ef-
`fectiveness, or gastrointestinal side effects
`Bioavailability data for methotrexate in dosages of less than
`20 mg/week, together with the ease of use and low cost of oral
`methotrexate, warrant first-line use of the oral route. Pharma-
`cokinetic studies have shown that the relative bioavailability of
`
`the oral route compared to the intramuscular route is good with
`low dosages but decreases as the methotrexate dosage in-
`creases. With 7.5 mg/week, the absolute oral bioavailability
`of methotrexate is close to 1 [26]. In a group of patients given
`10–17.5 mg/week of methotrexate, the mean relative bioavail-
`ability of the oral route compared to the intramuscular route
`was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77–0.93) [24]. The lower value of 0.64
`(95% CI, 0.21–0.94) was found with dosages greater than
`20 mg/week [25]. In these studies, no statistically significant
`differences in bioavailability were detected between the intra-
`muscular and the subcutaneous routes. The clinical efficacy
`and/or safety of methotrexate, according to the route of admin-
`istration has been evaluated only in open-label trials and retro-
`spective studies. In the above-mentioned study investigating
`the potential benefits of methotrexate dosages greater than
`15 mg/week [23], 64 patients with inadequate responses to oral
`methotrexate in dosages of 15–20 mg/week were given 15 mg/
`week intramuscularly during the 6 weeks preceding the rando-
`mization phase. The switch from oral to intramuscular admin-
`istration resulted in a 0.42 (95% CI, 0.15–0.69) point decrease
`in the DAS28; this reduced the DAS28 to less than 3.2 in 4
`(6.25%) patients. A similar open-label prospective study
`showed a significant reduction in the DAS28, by a mean of
`0.6, in 33 patients switched from oral to intramuscular metho-
`trexate [27]. Three retrospective studies showed that gastroin-
`testinal symptoms related to methotrexate administration de-
`creased after switching from the oral to the parenteral route
`[28–30].
`
`3.4. At present, there is no evidence indicating that a change
`in methotrexate dosage is in order when a TNF antagonist is
`given concomitantly
`
`In RCTs of the efficacy and/or safety of methotrexate com-
`bined with TNF antagonist therapy, the mean methotrexate do-
`sage ranged from 7.5 to 16 mg with infliximab [10,31], 14.5–
`18.5 mg with etanercept [11,32], and 17–20 mg with adalimu-
`mab [12,33]. The influence of the methotrexate dosage on ef-
`ficacy and safety was not investigated in these studies. In a
`single uncontrolled study of 22 RA patients with an inadequate
`response to infliximab (3 mg/kg) and methotrexate in combina-
`tion, increasing the methotrexate dosage from a mean of 9.9
`± 3.9 mg/week to a mean of 15 ± 4.3 mg/week improved the
`therapeutic response to infliximab in 36.4% of cases (8/22 pa-
`tients), within 16 weeks. However, this study was not con-
`trolled, and in seven of the eight patients the improvement
`was moderate according to EULAR criteria [34].
`
`3.5. The investigations that are mandatory before starting
`methotrexate therapy in a patient with RA consist of a full
`blood cell count, serum transaminase levels, serum creatinine
`with computation of creatinine clearance, and a chest
`radiograph
`
`In addition, serological tests for the hepatitis viruses B and
`C and a serum albumin assay are recommended. In patients
`
`Page 00004
`
`

`

`392
`
`S. Pavy et al. / Joint Bone Spine 73 (2006) 388–395
`
`with a history of respiratory disease or current respiratory
`symptoms, lung function tests with determination of the diffus-
`ing capacity for carbon monoxide are recommended.
`Determination of serum transaminase levels before starting
`methotrexate therapy is mandated by the risk of methotrexate-
`induced liver toxicity. A meta-analysis of 17 prospective or
`retrospective studies reporting the results of liver biopsies in
`719 patients taking methotrexate for RA showed 103 (14%)
`cases of mild fibrosis (Roenigk class IIIA), 6 (0.8%) cases of
`moderate fibrosis (Roenigk class IIIB), and 2 (2.8‰) cases of
`cirrhosis (including one patient who had known cirrhosis be-
`fore the initiation of methotrexate therapy) [35]. The frequency
`of clinically serious liver disease in patients taking methotrex-
`ate for RA can be estimated at 1% to 1‰ and the cumulative
`risk of developing clinically serious liver disease at about 1‰
`after 5 years [35]. A meta-analysis of six RCTs reporting the
`results of serial liver tests done over a 3-month period in 657
`RA patients taking methotrexate or a placebo showed that pa-
`tients taking methotrexate had higher rates of ALAT elevation
`(x 1-2 N, 6.7% vs. 0.4%), ASAT elevation (x 1-2 N, 4.9% vs.
`0.4%), and serum alkaline phosphatase (x 1-2 N, 16% vs. 3%)
`[35]. The far higher rate of alkaline phosphatase elevation
`(16% with methotrexate and 3% with a placebo) compared to
`ALAT and ASAT elevation suggested to the authors of this
`meta-analysis that alkaline phosphatase may be too sensitive
`to serve as a marker for liver injury [35]. Finally, in a prospec-
`tive study of three cohorts including a total of 94 patients trea-
`ted with methotrexate for RA, serial testing showed a correla-
`tion between serum transaminase levels and liver biopsy
`results: elevation of the mean pre-biopsy serum transaminase
`level was correlated with an increased risk of finding an abnor-
`mal histological grade, whereas normal values for over 50% of
`pre-biopsy serum transaminase levels had 97% specificity for a
`normal histological grade [36].
`The recommendation that serological tests for the hepatitis
`viruses B and C be performed before the initiation of metho-
`trexate therapy rests on the theoretical risk of potentiated meth-
`otrexate-induced liver toxicity in patients who have hepatitis B
`or C. Reactivation of the hepatitis B virus has been reported in
`five patients given methotrexate to treat RA, including four
`patients who experienced fulminating hepatitis at methotrexate
`discontinuation [37–41]. A single case of hepatitis C reactiva-
`tion, with a good response to ribavirin, was reported among six
`patients given methotrexate (12.5 ± 3 mg/week for 15.2
`± 9.9 months) to treat joint manifestations related to chronic
`hepatitis C [42]. Two patients with RA and hepatitis C infec-
`tion were treated with methotrexate for 6 months without ex-
`periencing transaminase elevation [43]. Based on these data,
`and considering that no conclusions can be drawn from the
`few anecdotal cases available to date, the experts recommend
`obtaining serological tests for the hepatitis viruses B and C
`before initiating methotrexate therapy in patients with RA.
`The hematological toxicity of methotrexate requires that a
`full blood cell count be obtained before treatment initiation.
`Cytopenia (pancytopenia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia)
`occurred in about 1% of patients in long-term prospective stu-
`
`dies of RA patients given low-dose methotrexate therapy. Cy-
`topenia can occur at any time during treatment, even after the
`first dose, and may be fatal in as many as 15%–25% of cases.
`Risk factors for cytopenia may include renal dysfunction, hy-
`poalbuminemia, infection, interactions with specific medica-
`tions
`(e.g.
`trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), and accidental
`overdosage [44–46].
`Renal dysfunction may potentiate the toxicity of methotrex-
`ate in patients with RA. Consequently, a serum creatinine as-
`say with creatinine clearance estimation should be performed
`before methotrexate initiation. As specified in the recommen-
`dation on the starting dosage of methotrexate, moderate to se-
`vere renal failure is associated with elevated serum methotrex-
`ate levels that result in a significant increase in the risk of
`serious adverse effects, most notably hepatic and pulmonary
`toxicity [20–22].
`Because hypoalbuminemia is associated with increased
`methotrexate toxicity, serum albumin should be assayed before
`treatment initiation. Hypoalbuminemia has been reported as a
`potential risk factor for methotrexate-induced hematological
`and pulmonary toxicity [45,47].
`The well-established pulmonary toxicity of methotrexate re-
`quires that a chest radiograph be obtained before treatment in-
`itiation. In patients with a history of respiratory disease or cur-
`rent
`respiratory
`symptoms,
`lung
`function
`tests with
`determination of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide
`(DLCO) should be performed also. Methotrexate-induced pul-
`monary toxicity manifests chiefly as infectious or immunoaller-
`gic pneumonia. Immunoallergic pneumonia, which causes in-
`terstitial pneumonitis, occurs in nearly 2% of patients given
`methotrexate to treat RA and carries a mortality rate of about
`10–20%. Methotrexate pneumonitis can develop at any time
`during methotrexate therapy but may be more common during
`the first year. Potential risk factors may include pre-existing
`lung disease, most notably with interstitial involvement; older
`age; renal dysfunction; and diabetes mellitus. The symptoms of
`methotrexate pneumonitis set in gradually, over several days to
`weeks. They are nonspecific, consisting chiefly of a fever, a
`nonproductive cough, and dyspnea. Among tests that can assist
`in the diagnosis of methotrexate pneumonitis, chest radiogra-
`phy has low sensitivity and low specificity but may disclose
`interstitial and/or alveolar densities predominating in the lung
`bases. Lung function testing with determination of blood gas
`values and DLCO is sensitive but lacks specificity; the results
`may show hypoxia, a DLCO reduction (≤ 70% of the predicted
`age-specific value), and/or a restrictive ventilatory pattern.
`High-resolution computed tomography is sensitive and more
`specific than lung function testing. Findings may include inter-
`stitial infiltrates and/or ground-glass densities predominating in
`the lung bases. The appropriateness of bronchoscopy with
`bronchoalveolar
`lavage and transbronchial
`lung biopsies
`should be discussed on a case-by-case basis with a pulmonol-
`ogist. Based on these facts, the experts concluded that a chest
`radiograph, and lung function testing with DLCO determina-
`tion in patients having a history of respiratory disease or cur-
`rent respiratory symptoms, should be performed routinely be-
`
`Page 00005
`
`

`

`S. Pavy et al. / Joint Bone Spine 73 (2006) 388–395
`
`393
`
`fore methotrexate initiation, both to provide baseline data and
`to ensure identification of potential risk factors for methotrex-
`ate pneumonitis, such as preexisting interstitial involvement or
`a low respiratory reserve [47–54].
`
`3.6. Investigations that are mandatory for monitoring
`methotrexate therapy in patients with RA consist of full blood
`cell counts and serum transaminase and creatinine assays
`
`These tests should be obtained at least once a month for the
`first 3 months then every 4–12 weeks.
`Blood cell counts and serum levels of transaminases and
`creatinine should be monitored to detect evidence of metho-
`trexate-induced hepatic and hematological toxicity and to look
`for renal dysfunction, which may potentiate methotrexate toxi-
`city, as stated regarding recommendation 5. The only evidence
`about the frequency of investigations comes from a meta-ana-
`lysis of two uncontrolled studies that report the results of liver
`function tests done every 2–6 weeks in RA patients given
`methotrexate for 30 months (N = 45) or 102 months (N = 18)
`[35]. The optimal frequency of transaminase monitoring was
`30–60 days [35]. Based on these data,
`the experts recom-
`mended a monitoring schedule that is widely used in their clin-
`ical practice, namely, tests at least once a month during the first
`3 months and every 4–12 weeks thereafter.
`
`3.7. Folate supplementation can be given routinely to patients
`treated with methotrexate for RA
`
`In practice, a minimal dosage of 5 mg of folic acid once a
`week, at a distance from the methotrexate dose, is appropriate.
`A meta-analysis showed that routine supplementation with
`folic acid or folinic acid had no major effects on variables re-
`flecting the activity of RA [55]. Data from a RCT, however,
`suggested that folic acid or folinic acid supplementation might
`require a slight methotrexate dosage increase to maintain effi-
`cacy [63]. Compared to a placebo, routine folic acid supple-
`mentation resulted in a 79% decrease in methotrexate-related
`gastrointestinal symptoms (stomatitis, abdominal pain, anorex-
`ia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation) (odds ratio,
`0.21; 95% CI, 0.10–0.44; P < 0.0001) [55,58,62]. Compared
`to continued folic acid supplementation, stopping supplementa-
`tion was associated with an increased risk of methotrexate dis-
`continuation due to gastrointestinal side effects (45% vs. 7%,
`P = 0.001) [64]. Routine folic acid or folinic acid supplementa-
`tion decreased the 1-year rate of methotrexate discontinuation
`because of transaminase elevation, compared to a placebo (4%
`with folic acid and 6% with folinic acid vs. 26% with the pla-
`cebo, P < 0.001) [63]. Stopping routine folic acid supplementa-
`tion (compared to continuing supplementation) was associated
`with an increase in the 1-year rate of methotrexate discontinua-
`tion for neutropenia (< 2000 neutrophils/mm3), although the
`difference was not statistically significant, probably because
`of the small number of neutropenia cases [64].
`
`Regarding the overall safety profile of methotrexate, routine
`folic acid or folinic acid supplementation decreased the 1-year
`rate of methotrexate discontinuation for adverse events (12%
`with folinic acid, 17% with folic acid, and 38% with the pla-
`cebo; P < 0.001) [60]. Stopping routine folic acid supplemen-
`tation increased the 1-year rate of methotrexate discontinuation
`for adverse events (46% vs. 21% when supplementation was
`continued, P = 0.02) [64].
`The influence of the product used for supplementation (folic
`acid vs. folinic acid), the dosage, and the dosing schedule
`(once a day vs. once a week) on the efficacy or safety of meth-
`otrexate in patients with RA is unclear. Various folate supple-
`mentation regimens were used in RCTs [55–64]. The results do
`not suggest major differences between low and high dosages of
`folic acid (ranges used: 1–5 mg/day and 5–27.5 mg/week) or
`folinic acid (ranges used: 1–5 mg/day and 2.5–20 mg/week)
`[55–64]. Therefore, the experts recommended a simple supple-
`mentation schedule consistent with existing clinical practice,
`namely, 5 mg of folic acid or folinic acid once a week, at a
`distance from the methotrexate dose.
`
`3.8. In the event of respiratory symptoms possibly related
`to methotrexate toxicity, the drug must be stopped
`and symptom severity evaluated
`
`Should evidence of serious disease be found, the patient
`should be admitted immediately or advice from a pulmonolo-
`gist should be obtained immediately.
`Methotrexate-induced lung toxicity was discussed about the
`recommendation on investigations required before methotrex-
`ate initiation in patients with RA. Lower respiratory tract infec-
`tions and immunoallergic pneumonitis are the main manifesta-
`tions. These potentially life-threatening complications may
`occur at any time during treatment. The symptoms are nonspe-
`cific and consist of a fever, a nonproductive cough, and dys-
`pnea. Respiratory symptoms that develop in an RA patient re-
`ceiving methotrexate
`therapy may
`indicate
`infection,
`methotrexate pneumonitis, or another cause of respiratory dis-
`ease related or unrelated to RA. The first step in differentiating
`among these possibilities is a thorough physical examination.
`The results are used to choose diagnostic investigations among
`the following: chest radiograph, cytological and microbiologi-
`cal stu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket