throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 22
`Entered: September 6, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-01365 (Patent 7,181,608 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01366 (Patent 8,090,936 B2)
`_______________
`
`
`Before GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, J. JOHN LEE, and JASON J. CHUNG,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`35 U.S.C. § 326(a)(10) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01365 (Patent 7,181,608 B2)
`IPR2016-01366 (Patent 8,090,936 B2)
`
`
`Both parties have requested oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`in each of the above-captioned cases. See, e.g., IPR2016-01365, Papers 18 & 19.
`The requests are granted.
`Each party will have 45 minutes total for its presentation for both cases.
`Each party is free to divide its time among the cases as it chooses, but must make
`clear at all times, for purposes of the transcript, the case(s) it is discussing.
`Regardless, any representation made by counsel at the consolidated oral argument
`is applicable to all proceedings in which an underlying basis exists for the
`representation. The oral hearing will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time, on
`Wednesday, September 20, 2017. The hearing will be open to the public for in-
`person attendance on the ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street,
`Alexandria, Virginia. In-person attendance will be accommodated on a first-come,
`first-served basis. The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. The hearing
`transcript will be entered in the record of each case.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the challenged patent
`claims are unpatentable. Therefore, at the oral hearing, Petitioner will proceed first
`to present its case with respect to the challenged claims and grounds on which the
`Board instituted trial. Petitioner may reserve some of its time for rebuttal. Patent
`Owner then will respond to Petitioner’s initial presentation. Thereafter, Petitioner
`may use any time it has reserved to rebut Patent Owner’s presentation. On
`rebuttal, Petitioner will be restricted to only those matters raised by Patent Owner
`in its presentation.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at least
`seven business days before the hearing. The parties shall meet and confer to
`discuss and resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits. Any party with
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01365 (Patent 7,181,608 B2)
`IPR2016-01366 (Patent 8,090,936 B2)
`
`unresolved objections must file a list of those objections with the Board at least
`two business days before the hearing. For each objection, the list must identify
`with particularity which portions of the demonstrative exhibits are subject to the
`objection and may include a short, one-sentence statement explaining the
`objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted. The Board will
`consider any objections and schedule a conference call if deemed necessary.
`Otherwise, the Board will reserve ruling on the objections. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits not timely presented will be considered waived.
`Notwithstanding 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), each party also shall file its
`demonstrative exhibits with the Board as a separate paper at least two business
`days prior to the hearing. A hard copy of the demonstratives should be provided to
`the court reporter at the hearing.
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v.
`Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041, slip op. 2–5
`(PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), and CBS Interactive Inc. v. Wireless Sciences
`LLC, Case IPR2013-00033 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper 118), for guidance
`regarding the proper content of demonstrative exhibits. Demonstrative exhibits are
`not evidence and may not introduce new evidence or arguments. Instead,
`demonstrative exhibits should cite to evidence in the record.
`At least one of the judges will be attending the hearing remotely. Therefore,
`the parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically
`each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number), paper, or exhibit from
`the record referenced during the hearing to assist the judges and ensure the clarity
`and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the oral
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01365 (Patent 7,181,608 B2)
`IPR2016-01366 (Patent 8,090,936 B2)
`
`or in part. If lead counsel for any party will not be in attendance at the hearing, the
`Board should be notified no later than three business days prior to the hearing, if
`possible, to discuss the matter.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be made at least five business
`days in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent to
`Trials@uspto.gov by e-mail. If the request is not timely received, the equipment
`may not be available on the day of the hearing.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that the measures set forth above shall govern the oral hearing in
`
`the above-captioned proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01365 (Patent 7,181,608 B2)
`IPR2016-01366 (Patent 8,090,936 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Walter Renner
`Jeremy Monaldo
`Andrew Patrick
`Katherine Vidal
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`IPR39521-0023IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Richard Zhang
`Joseph Edell
`FISCH SIGLER LLP
`richard.zhang.ipr@fischllp.com
`joe.edell@fischllp.com
`
` 5
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket