`
`
`
`February 2, 2001
`
`February 20, 2007
`
`Inventors: FALLON, et al.
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No.: 7,181,608
`
`IPR Control No.: IPR2016-01365
`
`Filed:
`
`Issued:
`
`Title:
`
`Systems and Methods for Accelerated Loading of Operating Systems
`and Application Programs
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID M. SAUNDERS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
`FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`
`I, David M. Saunders, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have been practicing law for 7 years, and have been practicing in the
`
`field of intellectual property, and particularly, patent litigation, for those 7 years.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California
`
`and the Bar of the District of Columbia, and am admitted to practice before the
`
`United States Courts of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, the United States District
`
`Court for the Central District of California, and the United States District Court for
`
`the Northern District of California.
`
`Ex. 2001
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Apple v. Realtime Data
`IPR2016-01365
`
`
`
`3. My California State Bar Membership No. is 260742, and my District
`
` Case No. IPR2016-01365
`U.S. Patent No. 7,181,608
`
`
`
`of Columbia Bar Membership No. is 1014047.
`
`4.
`
`I have never been suspended, disbarred, sanctioned, or cited for
`
`contempt by any court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`6.
`
`I have applied to appear pro hac vice in one other proceeding before
`
`the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in the last three (3) years: IPR2015-01754,
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. SSL Services, LLC.
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of title 37 of
`
`the Code of Federal Regulations.
`
`8.
`
`I understand that I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional
`
`Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`9.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I am
`
`currently counsel in the case of Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Apple, Inc., U.S.
`
`District Court for the Northern District of California case no. 3:16-cv-02595.
`
`10.
`
`I am familiar with the technology at issue in this proceeding from the
`
`prior work described above.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Ex. 2001
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`11.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my personal
`
` Case No. IPR2016-01365
`U.S. Patent No. 7,181,608
`
`
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with the knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or
`
`both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`_____________________
`
`David M. Saunders
`FISCH SIGLER LLP
`96 North Third Street
`Suite 260
`San Jose, CA 95112
`(650) 362-8208
`David.Saunders.IPR@fischllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 2, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 2001
`Page 3 of 3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
