`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REALTIME DATA LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01365
`Patent 7,181,608
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01365
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0023IP1
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 12),
`
`
`
`Petitioner submits this Request for Oral Argument on all of the instituted grounds of
`
`unpatentability of U.S. Patent No. 7,181,608. A request for Oral Argument in a
`
`related IPR proceeding (IPR2016-01366) is being filed on this same day.
`
`With regard to this particular proceeding, Petitioner requests (without waiving
`
`consideration of any issue not listed below) to address the following issues:
`
`1. Whether claims 1-31 are obvious over Sukegawa and Dye pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`2. Whether claims 1–6 and 9–17 are obvious over Sukegawa, Dye, and Settsu
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`3. Whether claims 1–6 and 9–17 are obvious over Sukegawa, Dye, and
`
`Burrows pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`4. Whether claims 1–6 and 9–17 are obvious over Sukegawa, Dye, Settsu,
`
`and Burrows pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`5. Any motions to exclude evidence by Patent Owner;
`
`6. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`7. Any additional issues on which the Board seeks clarification. The Board
`
`has already scheduled Oral Hearing for September 20, 2017. See
`
`Scheduling Order of January 18, 2017, Paper No. 12.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01365
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0023IP1
`Petitioner also respectfully requests the ability to use audio visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits, including the use of a projector and screen that
`
`connects to a laptop computer. Petitioner’s counsel will use a laptop computer with
`
`a VGA-type connector. In addition, Petitioner requests that an ELMO-type projector
`
`be made available for use.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 1, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/Jeremy J. Monaldo/
`W. Karl Renner, Reg. No. 41,265
`Jeremy Monaldo, Reg. No. 58,680
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: 202-783-5070
`F: 877-769-7945
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2016-01365
`Attorney Docket: 39521-0023IP1
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 CFR §§ 42.6(e)(1) and 42.6(e)(4)(iii), the undersigned certifies
`
`that on August 1, 2017, a complete and entire copy of this Petitioner’s Request for
`
`Oral Argument was provided via email to the Patent Owner by serving the email
`
`correspondence addresses of record as follows:
`
`Richard Z. Zhang
`David M. Saunders
`Joseph F. Edell
`5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Fourth Floor
`Washington, DC 20015
`
`Email:
`
`Richard.Zhang.IPR@fischllp.com
` David.Saunders.IPR@fischllp.com
` Joe.Edell.IPR@fischllp.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Diana Bradley/
`
`Diana Bradley
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`T: (858) 678-5667
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`