`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,850
`_____________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “Patent Board”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,850
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s January 9, 2017 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 12), Petitioner respectfully requests oral argument, which is currently
`
`scheduled for September 7, 2017, on the issues raised in the Petition for Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent 9,083,850 (“the ’850 patent”), Patent Owner’s
`
`Response, and Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response.
`
`The issues to be argued include:
`
`• The construction of certain terms of the ’850 patent;
`
`• The instituted grounds of unpatentability, namely whether:
`
`o Claims 1, 5, 8, 9, and 14 of the ’850 patent are unpatentable over
`Shipman and Garrison;
`
`o Claims 2-4 and 15-18 of the ’850 patent are unpatentable over
`Shipman, Garrison, and Mayhew;
`
`o Claims 6, 7, 10, 11, and 19 of the ’850 patent are unpatentable over
`Shipman, Garrison, and Gotsopoulos;
`
`o Claims 12 and 20 of the ’850 patent are unpatentable over
`Shipman, Garrison, Gotsopoulos, and Johnson; and
`
`o Claims 13 and 21 of the ’850 patent are unpatentable over
`Shipman, Garrison, and Johnson.
`
`• Any issues raised in Petitioner’s Motion to Submit Supplemental
`
`Information.
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,850
`• Any issues identified in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`• Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`• Any other issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including
`
`issues raised in papers yet to be filed, such as the Petitioner’s Reply to
`
`Patent Owner’s Response, Motions to Exclude, and Oppositions to
`
`Motions to Exclude; and
`
`• Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector,
`
`and screen.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`
`
` /
`
` Byron L. Pickard /
`
`
`Byron L. Pickard, Reg. No. 65,172
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 26, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,850
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served
`
`electronically via e-mail on July 26, 2017, in its entirety on the following:
`
`Justin B. Kimble (Lead Counsel)
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (Back-up Counsel)
`Daniel F. Olejko (Back-up Counsel)
`Terry A. Saad (Back-up Counsel)
`Nicholas C. Kliewer (Back-up Counsel)
`BRAGALONE CONROY PC
`JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com
`jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`dolejko@bcpc-law.com
`tsaad@bcpc-law.com
`nkliewer@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/ Byron L. Pickard /
`
`Byron L. Pickard, Reg. No. 65,172
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`Date: July 26, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 371-2600
`
`5933627_1.docx
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
