`By:
`Justin B. Kimble (JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone (jbragalone@bcpc-law.com)
`
`Daniel F. Olejko (dolejko@bcpc-law.com)
`Nicholas C. Kliewer (nkliewer@bcpc-law.com)
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Tel: 214.785.6670
`Fax: 214.786.6680
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,850
`
`
`
`PRO HAC VICE MOTION TO ADMIT ATTORNEY
`JEFFREY R. BRAGALONE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`EXHIBIT 2007: DECLARATION OF JEFFREY R. BRAGALONE
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`Patent 9,083,850
`
`I, Jeffrey R. Bragalone, make the following declaration based on my own
`
`personal knowledge and, if called to testify before the court, could and would testify
`
`as follows:
`
`1. I am a shareholder with the law firm of Bragalone Conroy PC, located at 2200
`
`Ross Avenue, Suite 4500-West, Dallas, TX 75201.
`
`2. I am a member in good standing of the Texas State Bar.
`
`3. I have never been subject to any suspensions or disbarments from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body.
`
`4. None of my applications for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body has ever been denied.
`
`5. I have never been sanctioned nor had contempt citations imposed by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`6. I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`7. I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`8. During the past three years, I have applied to appear or have appeared pro hac
`
`vice before the PTAB in 27 other proceedings, 13 of which involve the same
`
`parties as Petitioner and Patent Owner as this proceeding and also involve
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`Patent 9,083,850
`
`institutional telecommunication systems technology. In particular, I have
`
`represented Securus pro hac vice in the following post-grant proceedings
`
`before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board: IPR2014-00785, IPR2014-00810,
`
`IPR2014-00824,
`
`IPR2014-00825, CBM2014-00166,
`
`IPR2014-01282,
`
`IPR2014-01283, IPR2014-01278, IPR2015-0153, IPR2015-00155, IPR2015-
`
`00156, IPR2016-01123, and IPR2016-01220. In addition, I have appeared pro
`
`hac vice or have pending pro hac vice motions in the following proceedings:
`
`IPR2014-01092;
`
`IPR2014-01094;
`
`IPR2014-01095;
`
`IPR2014-01096;
`
`IPR2014-01097;
`
`IPR2014-01357;
`
`IPR2014-01359;
`
`IPR2014-01362;
`
`IPR2015-00487; IPR2015-00506; IPR2015-01666 (joined); IPR2015-01717
`
`(joined); IPR2015-01866; and IPR2015-01867.
`
`9. I have familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding. I have
`
`represented Securus in previous patent litigation as well as general litigation,
`
`which representation allowed me to become familiar with the subject matter
`
`at issue in the proceeding, i.e., institutional telecommunications and
`
`management systems. Specifically, I represented Securus in the patent
`
`litigation styled Howlink Global LLC v. Securus Technologies, Inc., No. 4:13-
`
`cv-562 (E.D. Tex., filed Sept. 24, 2013). In that matter, I defended against the
`
`plaintiff’s allegations that Securus’s inmate telecommunications systems
`
`infringed patents related to collect calls. As a result of my representation of
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01362
`Patent 9,083,850
`
`Securus in that matter, I spent significant time learning the technology
`
`involved in Securus’s inmate telecommunications systems. I have also
`
`represented Securus as a defendant in general litigation matters that have
`
`allowed me to develop additional familiarity with Securus’s inmate
`
`telecommunications and management systems. Those matters include
`
`SecureAlert, Inc. et al. v. Satellite Tracking of People, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-
`
`01107 (D. Utah, filed Dec. 17, 2013) and SecureAlert, Inc. et al. v. Derrick
`
`Brooks et al., No. 140901343 (3rd Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County,
`
`Utah, filed Feb. 21, 2014).
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed this 12th day of May, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeffrey R. Bragalone
`Bragalone Conroy PC
`2200 Ross Ave., Suite 4500-West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Phone: (214) 785-6670
`Email: jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
