`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 1:15–cv-00547–SLR
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY and
`NOKIA INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS’S IDENTIFICATION OF
`CLAIM TERMS AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order and as amended by agreement of the parties,
`
`Evolved Wireless identifies the following terms in the patents-in-suit in need of construction and
`
`the proposed constructions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’916 Patent Claim terms
`All terms in the ’916 Patent should be
`given their plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Proposed construction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’965 Patent Claim terms
` All terms in the ’965 Patent should be
`given their plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Proposed construction
`
`
`
`
`’373 Patent Claim terms
`1. “handover”
`
`2. “target base station”
`
`Proposed construction
`a process to transfer a telecommunication
`link by establishing radio connection with the
`target base station after radio connection with
`the source base station has ceased
`the base station to which the source base
`station determines the mobile terminal will
`be transferred
`
`ZTE 1025-0001
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’373 Patent Claim terms
`3. Claim 17:
`“the measurement report is used to
`determine”
`
`Proposed construction
`the measurement report is used by the source
`base station to determine
`
`
`
`
`’236 Patent Claim terms
` All terms in the ’236 Patent should be
`given their plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`Proposed construction
`
`
`’481 Patent Claim terms
` All terms in the ’481 Patent should be
`given their plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Discovery is at an early stage and expert discovery has not been completed. Evolved
`
`Proposed construction
`
`
`Wireless reserves the right to propose additional terms and amend its proposed constructions as
`
`the case moves forward and disputes or disagreements emerge between the parties, including
`
`from the claim terms and proposed constructions identified by the defendants in connection with
`
`the joint claim construction statement to be filed with the Court on May 17, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE 1025-0002
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 26, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Ryan M. Schultz
`
`PHILLIPS GOLDMAN MCLAUHLIN &
`HALL, P.A.
`John C. Phillips, Jr. (Bar No. 110)
`David A. Bilson (Bar No. 4986)
`1200 North Broom Street
`Wilmington, Delaware 19806
`(302) 655-4200
`jcp@pgmhlaw.com
`dab@pgmhlaw.com
`
`Christopher K. Larus (admitted pro hac vice)
`Ryan M. Schultz (admitted pro hac vice)
`Andrew D. Hedden (admitted pro hac vice)
`Benjamen C. Linden (admitted pro hac vice)
`Ryan E. Dornberger (admitted pro hac vice)
`Anthony F. Schlehuber (admitted pro hac vice)
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 2800
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
`Telephone: (612) 349-8500
`Facsimile: (612) 339-4181
`clarus@robinskaplan.com
`rschultz@robinskaplan.com
`ahedden@robinskaplan.com
`blinden@robinskaplan.com
`rdornberger@robinskaplan.com
`aschlehuber@robinskaplan.com
`
`Andrea L. Gothing (admitted pro hac vice)
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`2440 W. El Camino Real, Suite 100
`Mountain View, CA 94040
`Telephone: (650) 784-4040
`Facsimile: (650) 784-4041
`agothing@robinskaplan.com
`
`Counsel For Plaintiff Evolved Wireless, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE 1025-0003
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
