throbber
Downloaded from
`
`http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on March 5, 2015
`
`Insertion In 5'-flanklng region of apo Al, apo Gill, apo AIV and hence some
`weak changes In appropriate metabolic processes.
`
`NOVEL THERAPEUTICS AND PHARMACOLOGY - -
`
`Cllnlcal and pharmacoklnetlc (PK) results of 4 phase I
`studies of the second generation matrix
`metalloprotease (MMP) Inhibitor bay 12-9566, a
`non-pep«dlc blphenyl Inhibitor of MMPs 2, 3 & 9
`, H. H1rte1
`L. Seymqur1 , L. Grochow2, G. Eckhardt3, C. Erllchman4
`, A. Goei 1 ,
`R. Humphrey6, I. Elias~. 1 NCI-Canada Cllnlcaf Trials Group; 2 Johns Hopluns,
`Baltimore; 3CRTC, San Antonio; 4Mayo Clinic, Rochester; 58ayer
`Corporation, West Haven, CANADA
`
`Introduction: MMPs ara Involved In Invasion, metastasis and ang1ogenesls;
`MMPs 2 & 9 are overexpressed In the tumor/stroma of multiple cancers end
`correlate with outcome In many. MMPs ara thus attractive targets for Inhibition.
`BAY 12-9566 has nanomolar Inhibitory actlv1ty against MMP 2, 3 & 9 with
`anti-lnvaslve, anti-metastatic and anti-angiogenlc effects In preclinical models.
`Methods: 4 dose ranging trials of oral BAY-129566 wera conducted In
`North America to define PK/safety. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was toxlcity 2::
`grade (gr) 3; symptomatic or DL gr 2; MTD was declared If > 2 patients (pts)
`experienced DLT. Eligible pts had PS 0-2 and acceptable organ functlon.
`Results: 90 pis (median age 67yrs) with colon (31), breast (10), ranal(10),
`ovary (8), sarcoma (7), melanoma (6) and other cancers (18) entered 9
`dose levels. Dose related affects ware limited to reduction In platelet counts
`(plts)(nadir d 15-27) raverslble with continued therapy; In 4 heavily pretreated
`pts pits fell to gr 213 leading to prophylactic dose reduction; and mild anemia.
`Mild reversible transaminase elevations and GI effects (nausea, flatulence)
`were observed In some pts; musculoskeletal effects wera not reported MTD
`was not reached although DLT (pits) was seen in 1 pt at DL 6, 8 & 9.6 pts
`remaln on study (mean 236d [14o-314d]). 1 pt wl1h refractory melanoma (3
`prior regimens) had PR < 4 wks duration; 1 pt with refractory ovarian cancer
`(7 prior regimens) has SD alter 9.5 months.
`
`Dose Level (DL)
`Number ol pta (N)
`TotaVday (mg)
`Dose (mg)
`Schedul<I
`028 Trough (mean; mg/L)
`
`4
`7
`6
`6
`2
`1
`5
`3
`9
`12
`10
`18
`15
`16
`3
`3
`3
`10
`600 1200 1600 1600
`100 125 150 200
`400
`400
`100 125 150 200
`400
`400
`400
`800
`BID no CID BID
`OD OD 00 00 OD
`125
`117
`132
`37
`125
`51
`64
`72
`3B
`AUCo-.24 028 (mean, mg/M.) 1161 -
`-
`1739 1411 2300 3035 2275 3135
`
`Concluelon11: Oral BAY 12-9566 (800 mg bid) Is well tolerated With transient
`and usually clinically Insignificant decreases In pit counts and mild anemia the
`only dose related toxicities.
`
`16020 I Updated results of a phase I trlal of Tomudex® (T) In
`combination with oxaliplatln (L-OHP) In advanced
`solid tumors: A promising and active combination
`
`M. Ducreyx, K. Flzazi, C. Daniel, P. Ruffle, A. Kabouche, A. Fandi, M. Smith,
`J.P. Annand. /nstltut Gustave Roussy, Vl/18jurf (France), Zeneca
`Pharmsceutlcals, Cargy, (France)
`
`Introduction: The aim of the study Is to determine the mBXJmum tolerated
`dose and the recommended dose for subsequent phase II trials. The different
`mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles of T and L-OHP are the rationale to
`test their combination
`Methods: Twas administered as e 15 minutes Infusion followed by L-OHP
`as a 2 hours Infusion, repeated 3 weekly. Dose escalation Is shown below:
`
`Dose~
`T/L-OHP
`(mglm2)
`Number of
`(ptslcyclea)
`
`1
`2185
`
`3110
`
`2
`2.5185
`
`3
`2 51110
`
`4
`31110
`
`5
`31130
`
`6
`3.51130
`
`7
`3.751130
`
`3121
`
`3112
`
`3110
`
`16163
`
`14/61
`
`516
`
`Patients: so far, 47 patients (pts) have been entered: 30 M/17 F, median
`age 57 years (29 - 72), PS (WHO)· O = 15, 1 = 25, 2 = 7. Primary neoplasms
`wera malignant mesothellorna (17), gastrolntestinal malignancies (14), renal
`carcinoma (5), lung cancer (4), other (7). Thirty six pts were pre-treated.
`Results: Durlng the first 4 levels, no dose-limiting toX1city was observed.
`An asymptomatic Increase in transamlnases was frequent whatever the step.
`During the subsequent steps, grade 3 + 4 toxlciUes included: pts (cycles)
`Step 5: vomiting 3 (3), diarrhoea 2 (3), neutropenla 1 (2), thrombocytopenla
`1 (1 ), anemia 2 (2), peripheral neutoX1city 1 (1 ), astherna 1 (1)
`Step 6: vomiting 2 (2), neurotoxlcity (fugax amaurosis) 2 (2), asthenle 3 (4),
`anemia 1 (1), thrombocytopenla 1 (1), diarrhoea 1 (1)
`Step 7: Is ongoing and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. However,
`gastrolntestinal toxicities and asthenia seem dose-limiting.
`
`Molecular oncology/ Novel therapeutics and phannacology
`
`Fourty four pts are evaluable for response and 3 pts ara too early: 9 partlai
`responses \T mesothel loma, 1 pancreatic cancer, 1 renal carcinoma) 18 stable
`disease and 17 progressive disease.
`Conclusion: This combination 1s well tolerated and has shown actMty. In
`the light of these good results, we era planning two phase II trials at a dose of
`3 mg T and 130 mg of L-OHP: one In mesothelioma and another In advanced
`colorectal cancer.
`
`l 6030 I Phase I study of RPR109881A, a new taxold
`
`administered as a three hour Intravenous Infusion to
`patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors
`C. Sessa 1 , S. Calchera 1 , J. De Jong 1 , C. Monnerat2, D. Perard3, L Vemlllet3,
`A. Riva3 , M. Besenva13, J. Bauer2. 10sp. San Giovanni, Belllnzona, 2 CHUV,
`Lausanne, Switzerland; 3 Rh6ne-Poul6nc Rorer, Antony. France
`RPR109881A has shown a broad spectrum of activity in In vl\lo and In vitro
`tumor models and Is able to cross the blood brain barrier. Five phase I
`studies are ongoing to deflne the recommended dose and schedule (1-, 3-, 6-,
`24-hour and 1-hour dl-d8 q3w). We report the prallmlnary results of the 3-hour
`schedule with an oral pramedicatlon with dexamethasone (-25, -13, 1-hour).
`The starting dose of 75 rnglrn2 was defined according to the safety profile of
`pts treated with other schedules (1-hour/6-hour). Dose escalation was done
`according to the modified Flbonacci's schedule. 13 pts (9 males/4 females -
`median age: 52) previously treated with ::: 2 prior chemotherapies (CT) were
`included. The dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) ara as follows:
`
`Dose
`rr¢n2
`
`75
`90
`
`:: 1 prio< CT
`Nbof
`Dl Ts et th& flrst
`pts
`cycle
`no
`1
`lebr'ile
`6
`nuetropenle (1)
`
`Nb ol
`pta
`2
`4
`
`:: 2 prior CT
`DL Tu et the llrat cycia
`
`no
`toxic death. ecuie resplratOIY distress
`syndrome· (1)
`dierrtiee gr.3, fatigue gr3 (1)
`diarrhea gr.3, febrile neutropenle (1)
`neutropenla gr.4 > 7d (1)
`
`• 1n NSCLC pl with pulmonruy fibrosls llBCOlldery to radiotherapy
`
`50% pts presented neutropenla Gr.4. Alopecla Gr.213 was universal; other
`toxicities were: arthralgia, nausea, rash of mild to moderate severity. One pt
`died because of viral Infection while neutropenic alter the 4th cycle. Blood
`samples wera collected over a o-48 h period for PK analysis. PK parameters
`were elmller over the 2 tested doses with mean values of plasma clearance,
`volume of distribution and terminal half-Ille of "' 40 L/h/m2, 1000 Um2 and 30
`h, respectively (n=11 ). Additional pts will be treated at 90 mg/~ (::; 1 previous
`CD or 75 rnglm2 (:;: 1 previous CT + RT) and randomized between 1-h versus
`3-h to establish the best schedule and to conflrm its leas1bility for phase II
`study. Two confirmed partial response In 2 NSCLC pts has been observed
`at 90 rnglrn2: one untreated pt p<esented brain metastases and responded In
`both lung and brain leslons.
`
`Evidence for the duration of the antlfolate action of the
`thymldylate synthase (TS) Inhibitor ZD9331 using
`plasma dUrd as a surrogate marker of enzyme
`Inhibition
`A. L Jackman, F. Mitchell, S. Lynn, G W. Aheme, C. Rees, A.H. Calvert,
`I.A. Judson, S. Diab, K. Mayne, M. Smith. the ZD9331 Phase I International
`Investigators Group; CRC Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of
`Cancer Res9Brch, Sutton, UK
`
`Introduction: lnhlbiuon of TS by raltitrexed (Tomudex~; Zeneca) or the non(cid:173)
`polyglutamatable drug ZD9331 leads to a rise in the level of intracellular
`dUMP and hence plasma dUrd In mice and humans. Plasma dUrd levels wera
`measured In lour phase I dose escalating trials of ZD9331, Including two trials
`where a 30 mm mfuslon was given either on day 1 or on days 1 and 8, with
`cycles repeated every 3 weeks.
`Methods: Pre- and post-treatment blood samples were Immediately cooled
`on Ice and spun to separate the plasma (stored at -7Cl°C). Following de(cid:173)
`proteinlsatlon and solid-phase ex1ractlon, samples were analysed for dUrd by
`lsocratic reverse-phase HPLC uslng a spectral scanning UV detector.
`Results: Both trials started at a dose ol 4.8mglrn2/d. A rise (-2-lold) In dUrd
`was seen at this dose that was of -48h duration (-d.2-3/d9-10). As doses
`Increased, a mora prolonged effect and In some patients a greater rise In dUrd
`levels was seen e.g. at 19.2rnglrn2/d, 3 patients had 3-4-lold rises on d2 that
`had not returned to pre-treatment levels by d5. In those patients who had a
`second dose on d8, a further rise In dUrd of the same magnitude occurred on
`d9 wrth return to pre-treatment levels by d15-22. At 32mg/m2/d, some patients
`had plasma dUrd that had not completely returned to pre-treatment levels by
`d8. One patient had 5, 2, 8 and 3-lold rises on days 2, 8, 9 and 15 respectively.
`These data provide evidence of TS 1nhlbltion that Is of longer duration with
`increasing doses of ZD9331. Two patients at 4.8 and 9.6mg/rn2/d on the d1
`and 8 schedule showed a partial and minor tumour response respectively. The
`trials are 0!1g04ng and the MTD has not yet been reached.
`
`Annals of Oncology, Supplement 4 to Volume 9, 1998
`
`0 l 998 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Pnnted in The Netherlands
`
`125
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1008-00001
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on March 5, 2015
`
`Novel therapeutics and phannacology
`
`Conclusions: A rapid, sensJtive and reliable method has been developed tor
`the measurement of plasma dUrd in patients receMng anbfolate drugs. These
`data suggest that the duration of TS Inhibition Is dose-related and will help In the
`cholce of dose and schedule for Phase II tr1als of ZD9331 and understanding
`the relationship of durabon of target inh1bltlon and response/toxicity.
`
`I soso I Strategies for Improvement In dose escalation using
`
`the continua! reassessment method (CRM) In phase I
`cllnlcal trials
`
`LL Siu, X. Paoletti, J. O'Qulgley, E.K. Rowlnsky, G.M Clark, D.D Voo Hoff,
`S.G. Eckhardt. Canc8r Therapy and Resoorch Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
`and U436 INSERM, Paris, France
`
`The CAM has been proposed as an alternative dose escalation method in
`the phase I clinical trial deslgn of antineoplastic agents, with the elm of
`exposing a greater proportion of patients (pts) to therapeutic drug doses than
`traditional approaches. The statistical model utilized Is a sequential Bayesian
`estimation scheme In which a prior distribution tunctloo of the rnBXlmum
`tolerated dose (MTD) and a dose toxic-response model are selected before
`the trial. The MTD Is the dose at which a pre-<letermined percentage (e.g.
`30%) of the pt population would experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, e.g. Gr
`3 non-hematologic or Gr 4 hematologic). In response to the pracbcal and safety
`concerns of cytotoxic chemotherapy, mod1flcatlons of the CAM (MCRM) were
`Implemented whlch lndude the use of a conventional startlng dose and the
`fixation of dose levels a pnon, customarily by applying the modified Fibonacci
`sequence. However, our experience with ttus dose escalabon method has
`been problematic due to the dependence on non-d1nlcal toxicity information
`prior to the trial, and the difficulty of predicting a fixed number of dose levels.
`Therefore, we have designed a "dual-stage" escalation scheme. The initial
`stage involves utilization of a conventional starting dose wrth doubling of the
`dose In slngle-pt cohorts until moderate toxicity (e.g. Gr 2 non-hematologic or
`Gr 3 hematologic) Is encountered, at which polnt 2 additional pis are accured
`and dose escalation proceeds In a more conservative manner (e.g. at 33%
`to 50% Increments). The second stage begins ooce DL T Is reached, and the
`CAM Is used to guide subsequent assignment of dose levels Instead of the
`Bayesian methodology, a maximum likelihood approach (O'Quigley and Shen)
`Is applied which offers greater flexlblllty wtthout restrlctlon by the paucity of
`prior data. Pracbcal examples and slmula!Jons of models will be provided to
`Illustrate this proposed dose escalation method.
`
`1 soso I Synergistic antltumor effect by novel modified
`ollgonucleotldes targeting PKAI combined with
`cytotoxic drugs or monoclonal antibodies
`G. Tortora, V. Damiano, R. Blanco, S. Pepe, A.A. Bianco, S. Agrawai1 ,
`J. Mendelsohn2, F. Ciardiello. Oncologla Med/ca, Univ F9derlco II, Napo/1,
`Italy; 1 Hybridon, Cambridge, MA, USA; 2 UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center,
`Houston, TX, USA
`
`Introduction: Protein kinase A type I (PKAI) plays a key role In neoplasbc
`transformatloo and conveys mltogenic signals of different growth factors and
`oncogenes. Moreover, PKAI Is overexpressed 1n cancer cells wtth an active
`TGFa-epldermaJ growth factor receptor (EGFR) eutocrine pathway and shows
`a structural and functional interactlon with EGFR. Inhibition of PKAI, or its
`regulatory subunit Ria, results In cancer growth inhibition In vitro and In VIVo.
`Methods: A novel class of mixed backbone oligonucieotides (MBOs) tar(cid:173)
`geting PKAI (ASRla), with Improved pharmscoklnetic and b!oavallab1hty, and a
`humanized monoclonal antibody which blocks activation of EGFR, MAb C225,
`have been tested In vitro and In vlYo on several human cancer cells.
`Results: A dose;:lependent inhibition of soft agar growth was obtained In
`all cancer types tested with the AS Ria MBOs, as compared to mismatched
`control ollgos. Non-lnhlbltOf)' doses of each MBO resulted In a synergistic
`growth Inhibition and Increased apoptosls, when combined wtth taxanes,
`platinum-dBrlvatJves and topo II-selective drugs. When the MBOs administered
`elther l.p. or p.o. were added to pacirtaxel, a cooperative effect was also
`obtained In VIVo, causing tumor growth Inhibition and Increase of survival In
`nude mJce bearing human cancer xenografts Finally, cornbmed treatment of
`human breast and renal cancer cells, which overexpress PKAJ and EGFR,
`wtth the ASRla MBO and MAb C225, caused a cooperative antltumor effect In
`vitro and In VIVo.
`Conclusions: Since both the AS Ria MBOs and the MAb C225 are currently
`studied In clinical trials, the combination between them or wtth selected
`cytotoxic drugs may represent a feasible novel therapeutic strategy
`
`j 6070 I Pharmacoklnetlc (PK) Interaction of the combination
`
`of doxorublcln (DOX) and Taxotere (TXT)
`J. Schuller, M. Czajka, E. Krexner, K. Lehner, H. Bucher, G. Schemthaner.
`Hosp/ta/ Rudo/fsbftung Oncol. Dep., lnstft phsrma chem Vienna, Austna
`
`Introduction: Combination of DOX with TXT has been shown to be highly
`effective In advanced breast cancer recently Introduced into adluvant treatment
`Purpose of the present study was to detect a potential PK interactlon between
`
`DOX and TXT, as already proven for Paclltaxel + DOX leadlng to Increased
`DOX-AUC and enhanced cardiotoxiclty (Gianni et al). Therefore PK behavior
`of both, DOX and TXT, was analyzed using 2 different time schedules: DOX
`50mgim2 30mln Inf. followed Immediately (A) of after 1 HR interval (B) by TXT
`75mgim2 1 HR lnfusloo.
`Methods: All pis received TXT alone at cycle 1 for baseline determination
`followed by DOX + TXT (18 pts schedule A, 13 pis B, sampling for both DOX
`and TXT), followed by DOX baseline anafysls (12 pis A, 6 pis B, TXT then
`given delayed after end of DOX sampling). Sampling period 4HR for TXT and
`6HR for DOX, measured by HPLC, Wln Nonlln noocompartlmental analysls
`performed.
`Results: of the respective AUG last:
`
`AUG
`ng/ml.H
`
`A
`B
`
`Taxotere
`OOXfTXT
`1956
`2450
`
`TXT
`1484
`1703
`
`n
`18
`13
`
`p
`0.03
`0.05
`
`n
`12
`6
`
`Doxorublcln
`OOX
`DOXfTXT
`859
`848
`906
`833
`
`p
`0 9
`0.6
`
`Conclusion: No Influence of TXT oo DOX-AUC documented, DOX-ol cone
`(n=S) with or wfthout TXT n.s. different (p O 2 - 0.8), thus explaining low
`cardlotoxlc!ty of the combination. In contrast, TXT-AUC was SJgnlftcantly In(cid:173)
`creased when combined wrth DOX, suggesbng Interference at the hepatic
`microsomal level, partly explaining high clinical efficacy. A 1 HR delay between
`end of DOX and start of TXT does not change the respective PK behaviour of
`both drugs.
`
`I soap I Gemcltablne (GEM) - clspletln (COOP): A schedule
`
`finding phase VII study
`J.R. Kroep 1 , G.J. Peters 1 , C.J.A. Van Moorsel 1 , J.B. Vermorken3 ,
`P.E Postmus2, A. Catik 1 , H.M. Pinedo1 , C.J. Van Groeningen 1 • 1 Dept. Oncol.
`and 2 Pulm., Univ. Hosp. VU, Amsterdam, NL and 3 Dept. Onco/., Univ. Hosp.
`Antwerp, B, The Netherlands
`
`Introduction: Gem and CDDP are active agalnst various solid tumors. Slnce
`preclinical studies demonstrated the efficacy of various schedules we evaluated
`the tolerabtlrty and clinical efficacy of 4 different Gem/CDDP schedules as part
`of a pharmacoklnebc and -<fynamlc (PK/PD) study.
`Methods: Gem BOO mglm2 was administered as a 30 min lnfuslon on d 1, 8,
`15, and CDDP 50 mg/m2 over 1 hr on d 1, 8 every 28 days; Gem 4 hr before
`CDDP (10 pis), or vice versa (14) and Gem 24 hr before CDDP (9), or vice versa
`(9), after one cycle followed by the reversed schedule. Pis (19 male/23 ferMie,
`median age 54 years (31-77], and perfonnance status 1 [0-2]) lnduded, 9
`ovarian, 7 noo-small cell lung (NSCLC), 5 head/neck squamous cell (HNSCC),
`5 esophageal, 4 melanoma, 4 cervix, 3 adenocarcinoma, 2 pancreatic, 2 colon
`and 1 small cell lung (SCLC). 26 pis received prior chemotherapy, of which 21
`platlnum based.
`Results: A mean of 4.2, 2.6, 3.8 and 3.5 cycles was given In the four
`schedules, resp. The most frequent overall grade 314 CTC-toxicity was throrn(cid:173)
`bocytopenla, 6110, 4114, 2/9 and 619 (overall 60%), followed by leukopenla,
`8110, 5114, 619 and 619 (43%), in the 4 schedules, resp. Therefore, Gem was
`not given oo d 15 In 36% of pis in cycle 1. Anemia was observed In 64%
`of pis. No serious bleeding occurred. Myelotoxlclty was cumulabve, but not
`schedule dependent Non-hematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1/2
`nausea/vomiting and fatrgue. One pabent died of toxlcrty following severe neu(cid:173)
`trope111a and sepsis. Creatlnine clearance decreased slightly during therapy.
`Ann-tumor effects In 36 evaluable pis: HNSCC, 1 CR; esophageal, 1 CR/2PR;
`ovarian, 2 PR; NSCLC, 1 PR; melanoma, 1 PR and adenocarcinoma, 1 PR.
`Conclusion: (Cumulative) myelosuppress1on was the major toxicity, al(cid:173)
`though It was not schedule dependent. Based on toxicity, efficacy and PK/PD
`data a phase II study, CDDP 24 hr before Gem, has been started in pts wtth
`upper gastro-mtestinal tumors
`
`I sogp I MTA (LY231514): Relatlonshlp of vitamin metabolite
`proflle, drug exposure, and other patient
`characteristics to toxicity
`
`C. Nlvlklza, S. Baker, R. Johnson, J. Walling, D. Seltz, R. Allen. Ully Research
`Laboratories, Indiana, USA; Cancer Treatment and Research Center, Texas,
`USA; Univ of Colorado Healtf1 SciBflCBS Center, Colorado, USA
`
`Introduction: MTA 1s a novel multitargeted antifolate wtth Inhibitory activity
`agalnst mulbple enzymes. Phase l/ll studies have shown activity In a variety
`of tumors Historical data on other antifolates have suggested that a petienfs
`nutntlonal status may play a role In the likelihood of experiencing severe toxicity.
`The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of vitamin metabolrtes,
`drug exposure, and other prespedfled baseline patient characteristics to toxicity
`following treatment wrth MTA.
`Methods: Homocystelne (Heys), cystathionlne and methy1malonic acid were
`measured In 139 phase II patients wtth tumors of the colon, breast, pancreas,
`and esophagus at baseline and once each cycle thereafter. Stepwise regres(cid:173)
`SIOll modeling, multivariate analysis of variance, and dlscrlmlnant analysis
`were Implemented to determine which predictors might correlate with severe
`toX1city after ooe course of MTA. Prognostic factors considered were age, gen-
`
`126
`
`Annals of Oncology. Supplement 4 to Volume 9. 1998
`
`Cl 1998 Kluwer Acooem1c Publishers, Pnnted in The Netherlands
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1008-00002
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on March 5, 2015
`
`Novel therapeutics and phamiacology
`
`diameter-rollimated probe, allowed us to locate that leslon for thoracoscoplc
`resection. From June 1997 to January 1998 we treated 15 consecutive patients
`(pts) with sub-centimeter pulmonary nodules. Nine pis were affected by a
`synchronous and metachronous malignant neoplasm In other sltes. Computed
`thomography of the chest helped In the planning of the operative procedure, the
`poslbon of pts, and ideal ports. A hot-spot was easily detected, In all patients,
`by the probe Introduced In the pleural space through a 11.5 mm trocar. The total
`excision of the lesion was confirmed by detection of radioactivity In the removed
`speamen and Its absence In the resection margins of the lung. Pathological
`examination of specimens showed 8 benign lesions and 7 malignant leslons
`(4 metastases and 3 lung cancer) and It confirmed the absence of Infiltration
`In the resectlon margins The surgical procedure was ex1ended for an average
`of 56.6 minutes (range 35-100 min). The average post-<iperatlve hospital stay
`was 3.6 days (range 3-6 days) In our experience this technique proved safe
`and accurate, allowing easy detection of the pleural surtace projection and fast
`removal of the leslon. This technique offers a simple and reliable method for
`local1zatlon of pnrnary and metastatic tumors by VATS.
`
`i s12P I Phannacoklnetlc (PK) of Tomudex® (raltltrexed) (T)
`and oxallplatln (0) combination: Preliminary results of
`an ongoing phase I study
`K. F1zazl1, M. Bonnay1, D. Fourcautt1 , P. Ruffle1, o. Couturas2 , M. Smith2,
`R Gomenl2, A. Fandi2 , J.P. Armand 1• 1 tnstltut Gustave Roussy, Vlllejuif,
`2 Zen6C8 PharmaceuticaJs, Cergy, France
`
`Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the posslble kinetic
`interactions between T and 0 administered to patients with advanced disease.
`Methods: Patients first recelved T (15 min Infusion), followed 45 minutes
`later by 0 (2-hour Infusion). Three patients received T at a dose of 3 mglm2
`and 3 at a dose of 3.5 mglm2. All of them received the same dose of 130
`mglm2 of 0.
`Results: Plasma concentrations of T declined tri-exponentlally after the
`end of the Infusion. The terminal t1/2 derived from samples up to 28 hours
`post-dose vaned between lnclMduals from 9 3 to 193.2 h with average values
`of 73.4 and 33.7 for the two dose levels. The maximal concentrations varied
`between 323 and 1185 ng/ml with averages of 681 and 813 In the 3 mg!m2 and
`3.5 mglm2 groups respectively. The AUG vaned between 720 and 3192 ng.tVml
`with average of 1577 and 1378 In the two groups. The comparison between
`the two groups did not revealed any difference, probably due to the very large
`Intra subject vanabllity, however the mean AUG showed an approximately
`proportional Increase with 1ncreaslng dose. The estimated kinetic parameters
`were In agreement with the values prevlously published. Plasma concentrations
`of 0 declined bi-exponentially after the end of the Infusion. The tenninal t1/2
`varied from 18 to 30 h (average of 25). Cmax ranged from 3.13 to 4.53 (average
`of 3.69) µg/ml. The AUC ranged from 74 to 120 (average of 195) 119.h/ml and
`the Cl vaned between 1.76 and 3.43 (average of 2.47) 1/h. The comparison
`of the kinetic parameters of 0 to the ones previously published In the same
`experimental condrtlons seems to lndlcate that T Induced an Increase of 0 Cl
`(from 1.32 to 2.47 1/h) with a reduction of the terminal t1/2 from 38.7 to 24.8
`h and a reducllon of Cmax measured at the end of the lnfuslon from 5.11 to
`3.69 µg/mL
`Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that the expected concen(cid:173)
`trations of 0 obtained after administration of T may be lower that the ones
`observed when 0 Is administered alone. These results Indicate possible PK
`lnteractJon between the two drugs.
`
`I 613P I A phase I and phannacoklnetlc (PK) study of ET-743, a
`novel minor groove binder of marine origin
`administered on a dally x 5 schedule
`M. Hidalgo, M.A. Vlllalona-Calero, S.G. Eckhardt, G. Weiss, E. Campbell,
`M. Kraynak, J. Beljnen, J. Jimeno, D. Von Hoff, E. Rowlnsky. Cancer Therapy
`and Research Center, San Antonio, TX, The Netherlands Cancer Institute,
`Amsterdam, The Netherlands; PhannaMar, S.A., Madnd, Spain
`
`ET-7 43 Is a novel tetrahydrolsoqulnollne alkaloid Isolated from the marine
`organism EstenBJSCidian turblnata which binds to adenln!TCylosine rich regions
`within the minor groove of DNA. This study is evaluating the feaslblllty and
`PK behavior of ET-743 administered as a 1-hour Infusion dally x 5 every 3
`weeks In patients with advanced solid malignancies. Twenty-seven patients
`(median age 58, range 35-79; median ECOG PS-1) have received 67 courses
`of ET-743 at doses ranging from 6 to 380 1<g/m2-/day. At the 380 1tg/m2day
`dose level, 1 patient with ex1enslve prior treatment with 16 cycles of BCNU
`developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenla with fever, grade
`3 elevabon In transamlnases, and acute renal failure which resulted In death.
`Four patients (8 cycles), at the 216 (1), 287 (1) and 380 (2) 1<g/m2-lday dose
`level developed asymptomatic elevation in hepatic transamlnases of grade
`3 severtty that typically peaked on day 8 and resolved by day 21. Mild to
`moderate, dosedependent nausea and vomiting, which appeared on day 4
`and resolved on day 8, was observed In 14 patients. Two patients at the 380
`µglm2/day dose level suffered supertlcial venous thrombophleb!tls at the drug
`Infusion site. PK parameters obtained In 2 patients at the 216 µglm2-day dose
`level included: clearance, 137 and 589 mUmlnirrf.; t112 , 13.7 and 23.1 Uh; and,
`
`DPD activity has been measured in 14 pis thus far. Pretherapy DPD activity
`was a median 34% higher than after TOM administration (95% C.L -93 to
`+62%). PK data are available in 6 patients thus far, and 5-FU AUG basal
`values do not slgnlflcantly differ from values obtained 24 hours after TOM.
`Conclusions: The combination of TOM+ 5-FU/LFA Is well tolerated every
`2 weeks. Cllnlcal activity looks very encouraging, since the majortty of pis had
`already received prior chemotherapy. We are now treating some addlbonal
`chemo-nalve patients at step 7, In order to have a more reliable estimate of
`the actMty of the regimen.
`
`i s 11 P I Radlo-locallzatlon of pulmonary nodules using
`
`gamma-probe and resection by video-assisted
`thoracic surgery
`A. Challa, G.F. Menconl, F.M.G. Melfi, A. Gonflottl, G. Bonl 1 , G Grosso 1 ,
`E. Baldlni2, C .A. Angelettl. ServlC8 of Thoracic Surgery, Department of
`Surgery, 1 Service of NuclBBr Medicine and 2 Service of Med/cal Oncology.
`Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, Italy
`
`Vldeo-asslsted thoracic surgery (VATS) Is emerging as safe procedure for
`diagnosis and treatment of peripheral pulmonary nodules. One llm1tatlon of
`thoracoscoplc technique Is the Inability to detect those nodules which are very
`deep beneath the pleural suliace, and could only be ldenbfied via manual
`palpation. Several methods are used to localize VATS occult lesions prior to
`excision, Including methylene blue Injection and Introduction of hooked-wire;
`however, all suffer from limitations. Recent advancements In lntraoperatlve
`radio-localization of non-palpable breast lesions prompt us to develop a new
`technique for detection of pulmonary nodules by VATS. CT-scan are used
`to guide pelileslonal Injection of 0.2 - 0.5 ml of solution of 99m Tc-labeled
`human serum albumin mlcrospheres (5-10 MBq) and 0.2 ml of iodine-non-Ionic
`contrast medium, two hours before surgery. In VATS a gamma ray detector
`(Sclntl Probe MR 100 - Pol hi.tech., Aquila, Italy), equipped with 11mm
`
`Annal• of Oncology, Supplement 4 to Volume 9, 1998
`
`0 1998 Kluwer Acadenuc Publishers, Printed in 1be Netherlands
`
`127
`
`der, prior treatment, baseline albumin, liver enzymes, ANG, platelets, vitamin
`metabolites, and AUG.
`Results: Statistically slgruflcant predictors of Grade 4 neutropenia (n=21
`pis) were albumin (p = 0.0006) and Heys (p = 0.0012), while Grade 4
`thrombocytopenla (n=8) was highly predicted by Heys (p < 0.0001) and
`pre-treatment AST (p = 0.0012). Heys:::: 10µM predicted Grade 4 neutropenia
`In cycle one 75% of the time. Grade 4 neutropenla was predicted by Heys
`alone In 70% of cases. Heys and albumin levels cfld not appear to change
`from baseline during treatment wrth MTA While AUG was not found to be a
`predictor of toxicity, little vartabtlrty was observed In AUG. Maximum values
`were still below AUG values related to hematologic toXJcity In phase I studies
`Conclusions: Toxicities resulting from treatment with MTA appear to be
`predictable from pretreatment homocysteine levels. Elevated baseline ho(cid:173)
`mocystelne levels (:::: 1 OµM) highly correlate with severe hematologic and
`nonhematologlc toxicities following treatment with MTA. Homocyste!ne was
`found to be better than albumin at predicting toxicity. These results apply to
`the tumor types studied. Further studies are underway In patients with renal
`Impairment or patients who received prior cisplabn.
`
`i s1 OP I Phase I and pharmacoklnetlc (PK) study of Tomudex
`
`(TOM) + 5-Fluorouracll (5-FU) and levofollnlc acid (LFA)
`In advanced head and neck and colorectal cancer
`F, Gaponlgro, R. Casarettl, H.L. McLeod 1 , A. Budllion, G. Carten!, F. De Vita,
`A. Avallone, M. Blglletto, A. Tucci, J. Morsman1 , D. Barbarulo, G. Catalano,
`P. Comella, G. Comella. Southam Italy Cooperative Oncology Group c/o
`Nations/ Tumor Institute of Naples, fTALY; 1 University of Aberdeen, UK
`Background: Synergism between TOM and 5-FU + LFA Is observed In vitro
`when cells are exposed for 24 hours to TOM, followed by 5-FU + LFA.
`Preclinical studies support the idea that TOM might down-regulate the activity
`of dihydropylimidlne dehydrogenase (DPD).
`Patients end methods: Patients (pts) with advanced head and neck and
`colorectal cancer were treated with escalating doses of TOM on day 1, and
`bolus 5-FU (Immediately after LFA) on day 2, every 2 weeks. In the z-od course
`LFA and 5-FU wern administered on day 1 and TOM on day 2 with the aim
`of evaluating DPD and 5-FU AUG wrth and without pretreatment with TOM.
`Further treatment was given according to the sequence used In the 111 course.
`Results: Avallable clinical data are summarized below.
`
`Step TOM/LFA/5FU (rr.gtm2)
`1.51250/600
`2.()'250/600
`2 0/250/750
`2 51250/750
`2.5/250/fJOO
`3. ()'25()/9()()
`3 0/250/ t 050
`3 0/250/ t 200
`
`CIHN"
`Pis
`Response
`Or'6
`6
`1/5
`511
`1/6(PR)
`6
`2
`511
`1/6 (PR)
`6
`3
`316 (2CR, 1 PR)
`6
`511
`4
`611
`0/7
`7
`5
`6
`6/0
`1/8 (CR)
`8
`917
`7
`6/13 (1CR, SPA)
`18
`1/3 (PR)
`2/1
`3
`8
`OR
`Total
`41/17
`58
`-c • colorectal cancer; HN=haad & neck cancer. C • 6139 (15%); HN a 7/16 (44%); • N •
`neutropenla; M • mucoaJtls, R a Renal
`
`DLT
`0/6
`0/6
`0/6
`Or'6
`0/7
`1/8
`3115
`213
`
`N4
`N 4, N 4; N 4
`N 4, M 3, R 3
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1008-00003
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` by guest on March 5, 2015
`
`Phase I trial and pharmaclklnetics of
`beta-D-glucosyllsophosphoramlde mustard (D-19575)
`administered as a 6-hour Infusion every three weeks:
`An EORTC-ECSG study
`E. Bnasoulls 1 , I. Jucison2, N. Pavhdls 1, P. Beale2, Y. Groot3, G. Veerman 3 ,
`M. Schuessler", D. Rammou, A. Walker2, A. Hanauske5. 1 loannma University
`Hospital, Greece; 2 Royal Marsdan Hospital, UK; 3 EORTC-NDDO, 4 ASTA
`Med/ca AG, 5Gasthulsberg University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
`
`Introduction: D-19575 ls a beta-D-glucose-llnked isophosphoramlde mustard
`aiming to explolt the transmembrane glucose transporters overexpressed In
`tumour cells. This compound was taken Into dlnical tesbng because preclinical
`data showed a higher selectivity and less myelosuppresslon than ilosfamlda.
`Methods: The present study employed a two-step 6-hour Intravenous
`infusion (1/4 of the dose In 30-minutes, followed by 314 over Si hours) In
`order to increase the exposure and cellular uptake of the drug that has a short
`half-life. Treatment was given once every 3 weeks. Blood and urine samples
`for PK analysls were collected In all patJen

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket