throbber
United States Patent [19J
`Grindey et al.
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`[73]
`
`METHOD FOR TREATING
`GAR-TRANSFORMYLASE TUMORS IN
`MAMMALS AND REDUCING MAMMALIAN
`TOXICITY
`Inventors: Gerald B. Grindey, Indianapolis;
`Chuan Shih, Carmel, both of Ind.
`Assignee: Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis,
`Ind.
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`Appl. No.: 940,568
`Sep. 4, 1992
`
`Filed:
`
`[63]
`
`[51]
`
`[52]
`
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation of Ser. No. 911,429, Jul. 10, 1992, aban(cid:173)
`doned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 750,841,
`Aug. 26, 1991, abandoned, which is a continuation-in(cid:173)
`pan of Ser. No. 677,031, Mar. 29, 1991, abandoned.
`
`Int. CI.s ..................... AOlN 43/40; AOIN 43/54;
`A61K 31/44; A61K 31/505
`U.S. Cl ..................................... 514/260; 514/340;
`514/227.2; 514/267; 514/269; 514/275;
`514/292; 514/293; 514/342; 514/443; 514/445;
`514/468
`Field of Search ..................... 514/260, 340, 227 .2,
`514/267, 269, 275, 292, 293, 342, 443,445,468
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,684,653 8/1987 Taylor et al. ....................... 514/258
`4,833,145 5/1989 Taylor et al. ....................... 514/258
`4,871,743 10/1989 Taylor et al. ....................... 515/272
`4,882,334 11/1989 Shih et al. ........................... 514/258
`4,902,796 2/1990 Taylor et al. ....................... 544/279
`4,946,846 8/1990 Nomura et al. ..................... 544/258
`4,996,206 2/1991 Taylor et al. ....................... 514/258
`
`11111111111111111111111111111111 lllll lllll 111111111111111111111111111111111
`US005217974A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,217,974
`Jun.8, 1993
`
`4,997,838 3/1991 Akimoto et al. .................... 514/258
`5,010,194 4/1991 Mueller et al. ...................... 544/258
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`1093554 1/1981 Canada .
`409125 1/1991 European Pat. Off. .
`88/08844 11/1988 PCT Int'! Appl. .
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Young, et al., Proc. Amer. Assoc. Cancer Res., 31, 1053
`(1990).
`Muggia, et al., Proc. Amer. Soc. Clinical Oncology, 1,
`1285 (1990).
`Grindey, et al., Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meet(cid:173)
`ing of the American Association for Cancer Research,
`vol. 32, p. 384, Abst. 1921 (1991).
`Internal Eli Lilly and Company Memo Entitled "Can(cid:173)
`cer Progress Conference Trip Report".
`Derwent Abstract 45319S (abstracting DT2063027).
`Morgan, S. L., et al., Arthritis and Rheumatism 33: 9-18
`(1990).
`Straw, et al., Cancer Research, 44:3114-3119 (1984).
`Temple, et al., Cancer Treatment Reports, 65: 1117-1119
`(1981).
`
`Primary Examiner-Nathan M. Nutter
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Steven A. Fontana; Leroy
`Whitaker
`
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`Administration of a fol ate binding protein binding agent
`in conjunction with use of an antitumor agent which is
`an inhibitor of glycinamide ribonucleotide transformy(cid:173)
`lase or other antifolate reduces the toxic effects of such
`agent and provides an enhanced therapeutic index.
`
`22 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1009-00001
`
`

`
`1
`
`5,217,974
`
`2
`available salt or ester thereof. The invention more par(cid:173)
`ticularly provides a method for reducing the mamma(cid:173)
`lian toxicity of a GAR-transformylase inhibitor or other
`antifolate which binds to a FBP which comprises ad(cid:173)
`ministering a toxicity-reducing amount of a FBP bind(cid:173)
`ing agent or a physiologically-available salt or ester
`thereof to. the mammal receiving treatment. In particu(cid:173)
`lar, there is provided a method for reducing the toxicity
`10 of a GAR-transformylase inhibitor or other antifolate
`which binds to a FBP in a mammal which comprises
`pretreating the mammal with an amount of a compound
`selected from folic acid, (6R)-5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahy-
`15 drofolic acid, and (6R)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic
`acid, or a physiologically-available salt or ester thereof,
`sufficient to have substantially blocked the FBP before
`administration of the antifolate. In the most preferred
`embodiment of the invention, Lometrexol is adminis(cid:173)
`tered to a subject suffering from a solid tumor or other
`type of cancer and in need of treatment after pretreat-
`mei:it with folic acid, thereby reducing toxic effects of
`Lometrexol while maintaining good antitumor activity.
`
`METHOD FOR TREATING
`GAR· TRANSFORMYLASE TUMORS IN
`MAMMALS AND REDUCING MAMMALIAN
`TOXICITY
`
`This application is a continuation of application Ser.
`No. 07/911,429 filed Jul. 10, 1992, now abandoned,
`which is a continuation application Ser. No. 07/750,841,
`filed Aug. 26, 1991, now abandoned, which is a con(cid:173)
`tinuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/677,031
`filed Mar. 29, 1991 and now abandoned.
`
`5
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`Lometrexol is the generic name given to 5, 10-
`dideazatetrahydrofolic acid, also
`referred
`to as
`DDA THF. Lometrexol is a member of a new class of
`antitumor agents which have been found to specifically 20
`inhibit glycinamide ribonucleotide (GAR) transformy·
`lase, an enzyme required in the initial stages of purine
`biosynthesis, see J. Med. Chem., 28, 914 (1985). Several
`of these GAR·transformylase inhibitors are described, 25
`along with their antitumor utilities, by Taylor et al. in
`U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,684,653, 4,833,145, 4,902,796, 4,871,743
`and 4,882,334. GAR-transformylase inhibitors are also
`known to be useful in treating conditions such as gout,
`psoriasis, mycosis fungoides, autoimmune disorders, 30
`rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory disorders,
`and during organ transplantation and other related im(cid:173)
`munosuppressant related conditions.
`Lometrexol has been studied clinically and shown to 35
`be a potent antitumor agent, especially against solid
`tumors such as colorectal, lung, breast, head and neck
`and pancreatic; Young et al., Proc. Amer. Assoc. Cancer
`Research, 31, 1053 (1990). Like most other antitumor
`agents, Lometrexol exhibits some undesirable side ef- 40
`fects, in addition to its efficacy against tumors; Muggia
`et al., Proc. Amer. Soc. Clinical Oncology. 9, 1285 (1990).
`Typical side effects observed to date include anorexia,
`weight loss, mucositis, leukopenia, anemia, hypoac- 45
`tivity and dehydration.
`We have now discovered that the toxic effects of
`lometrexol and related GAR-transformylase inhibitors
`and other antifolate agents which bind to folate binding
`protein (FBP) (see, e.g., Kane, et al., Laboratory Investi· 50
`gation, 60, 737 (1989)) can be significantly reduced by
`the presence of a FBP binding agent, without adversely
`affecting therapeutic efficacy. The present invention
`thus provides a method for improving the therapeutic 55
`utility of GAR-transformylase inhibitors and other an(cid:173)
`tifolates by co-administering a FBP binding agent to the
`host under going treatment.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`The invention provides a method for reducing the
`toxicity of GAR-transformylase inhibitor or other an(cid:173)
`tifolates that bind to a FBP that is found in biological
`systems by the prior administration of a FBP binding
`agent or a physiologically-available salt or ester thereof.
`GAR-transformylase inhibitors and related antifolates
`are those compounds which effectively inhibit the bio(cid:173)
`logical actions of the enzyme known as glycinamide
`ribonucleotide transformylase. This enzyme is well
`known to be required in the initial stages of purine bio(cid:173)
`synthesis in mammals, which is implicated in DNA
`synthesis. Interruption of this biosynthetic pathway
`causes a disturbance in DNA synthesis and conse-
`quently causes cell death. Any compound which is
`shown to inhibit the GAR-transformylase or other fo(cid:173)
`late-requiring enzyme is subject to treatment in accor(cid:173)
`dance with this invention.
`Typical GAR-transformylase inhibitors include the
`pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives described by Tay(cid:173)
`lor et al.
`in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,684,653, 4,833,145,
`4,902,796, 4,871,743 and 4,882,334. Another series of
`GAR-transformylase inhibitors has recently been de-
`scribed by Akimoto in U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,838. Antifo(cid:173)
`late compounds which can be employed in this inven(cid:173)
`tion include thymidylate synthase inhibitors as found in
`EPO Patent Application 239,362. All of the foregoing
`references are incorporated herein by reference for
`their teaching of the structure and synthesis of typical
`GAR-transformylase inhibitors and antifolates. Other
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`60 GAR-transformylase inhibitors and antifolates are also
`In one aspect of this invention, we provide a method
`included within the scope of this invention, and such
`compounds can be determined by routine evaluation of
`of inhibiting
`the growth of GAR-transformylase-
`either their ability to interact with and inhibit the sub-
`dependent tumors in mammals comprising administer-
`ing to said mammals an effective amount of a GAR- 65 ject enzyme or to bind to the FBP.
`transformylase inhibitor or other antifolate which binds
`In a preferred embodiment of the invention, folic acid
`to a FBP in combination with a toxicity-reducing
`is administered to a subject subsequently receiving an
`amount of a FBP binding agent, or a physiologically-
`agent defined by the formula
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1009-00002
`
`

`
`3
`
`5,217,974
`
`4
`
`wherein
`R 1 is hydroxy or amino;
`R2 is hydrogen, methyl, ethyl, or propynyl;
`B is -CH- or -N-;
`n is 1, 2 or 3;
`Z is nitrogen or carbon;
`A is pyrido, tetrahydropyrido, pyrrolo, dihydropyr(cid:173)
`rolo, cyclopentyl or cyclohexyl;
`X is hydrogen or halo; and pharmaceutically accept(cid:173)
`able salts thereof.
`In a particularly preferred embodiment of the inven- 20
`tion, lometrexol is utilized as the GAR-transformylase
`inhibitor.
`
`As noted above, the drug products which can be
`employed in the present invention include other antifo(cid:173)
`lates which are capable of binding to folate binding
`protein. Folic acid itself has a binding constant (ng/ml)
`of 1.8, and lometrexol has a binding constant of 9.7 to
`15 bovine FBP. Any GAR-transformylase inhibitor or
`other antifolate that binds at less than about 500 ng/ml
`can be utilized in the method of this invention. The
`folate binding constant for drug products can be readily
`determined by the general procedure of Dunn and Fos(cid:173)
`ter, C/in. Chem., 19 (10), 1101-1105 (1973). Typical
`antifolates evaluated in the referenced procedure have
`the following folate binding constants presented in
`Table I below:
`
`TABLE I
`
`Binding Constant
`(ng/ml)
`
`n=3 X=H
`n = 2
`X = 2-F
`n = 2
`X = 3-F
`
`N
`
`A
`
`H2N
`
`N
`
`OH
`
`N
`)l
`H2N
`N
`
`N
`H
`
`N
`H
`
`s
`
`CONHCHCH2CH2COOH
`I
`COOH
`
`12.5
`14.0
`30.7
`
`250.8
`
`24.5
`
`26.0
`
`12.0
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1009-00003
`
`

`
`5
`
`5,217,974
`
`6
`
`TABLE I-continued
`
`'DOH
`
`N
`~
`HJC
`N
`
`CHJ~
`CH2-~--Z s )--coNH?HCH2CH2COOH
`
`COOH
`
`Binding Constant
`(ng/ml)
`
`245
`
`The FBP binding agent to be utilized according to
`As used in this invention, the term "FBP binding
`this invention can be in its free acid form, or can be in ·
`agent" refers to folic acid, (6R)-5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tet-
`the form of a physiologically-acceptable salt or ester
`rahydrofolic acid, or (6R)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahy-
`drofolic acid. This latter compound is the (6R)-isomer 15 which is converted to the parent acid in a biological
`of Ieucovorin as disclosed in J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74, 4215
`system. The dosage generally will be provided in the
`(1952). Both of the tetrahydrofolic acid compounds are
`form ofa vitamin supplement, namely as a tablet admin-
`in the unnatural configuration at the 6-position-they
`istered orally, preferably as a sustained release formula-
`are 10-20 fold more efficient in binding the folate bind-
`tion, as an aqueous solution added to drinking water, an
`ing protein compared with their respective (6S)- 20 aqueous parenteral formulation, e.g., an intravenous
`isomer-see Ratnam, et. al., Folate and Antifolate
`formulation, or the like.
`Transport in Mammalian Cells Symposium, Mar. 21-22,
`The FBP binding agent is administered to the subject
`1991, Bethesda, Md. These compounds are usually pre-
`mammal prior to treatment with the GAR-transformy-
`pared as a mixture with their natural form (6S) of diaste-
`lase inhibitor or other antifolate. Pretreatment with the
`reomers by non-stereoselective reduction from the cor- 25 suitable amount of FBP binding agent from about I to
`responding dehydro precursors followed by separation
`about 24 hours is usually sufficient to substantially bind
`through chromatographic or enzymatic techniques. See
`to and block the folate binding protein prior to adminis-
`e.g., PCT Patent Application Publication WO 880844
`tration of the GAR-transformylase inhibitor or other
`(also Derwent Abstract 88-368464/51) and Canadian
`antifolate. Although one single dose of the FBP binding
`Patent 1093554.
`30 agent, preferably an oral administration of folic acid,
`Folic acid is a vitamin which is required by mammals
`should be sufficient to load the folate binding protein,
`for proper regeneration of the blood-forming elements
`multiple dosing of the FBP binding agent can be em-
`and their functioning, and as a coenzyme is involved in
`ployed for periods up to weeks before treatment with
`intermediary metabolic processes in which one-carbon
`the active agent to ensure that the folate binding protein
`units are transferred. These reactions are important in 35 is sufficiently bound in order to maximize the benefit
`interconversions of various amino acids and in purine
`derived from such pretreatment.
`and pyrimidine synthesis. Folic acid is commonly sup-
`In the especially preferred embodiment of this inven-
`plied to diets of humans via consumption of food
`tion, about I mg to about 5 mg of folic acid is adminis-
`sources such as liver, kidney, dry beans, asparagus,
`tered orally to a mammal about 1 to about 24 hours
`mushrooms, broccoli, lettuce, milk and spinach, as well 40 prior to the parenteral administration of the amount of
`as by vitamin supplements. The minimum amount of
`lomotrexol which is normally required to attain the
`folic acid commonly required by normal adults is about
`desired therapeutic benefit. Although greater or addi-
`0.05 mg/day. According to this invention, folic acid, or
`tional doses of folic acid or another FBP binding agent
`a physiologically-available salt or ester thereof, is ad-
`are also operable, the above parameters will usually
`ministered to a human subject at a dose of about 0.5 45 bind the folate binding protein in an amount sufficient to
`mg/day to about 30 mg/day to diminish the toxic ef-
`reduce the toxicity effects normally seen upon lomo-
`fects of a GAR-transformylase inhibitor or other antifo-
`trexol administration above.
`late also being administered to such subject. In a pre-
`It should be noted that the FBP binding agent is not
`ferred embodiment, folic acid will be administered at
`an antitumor agent and that the pretreatment of a mam-
`about 1 to about 5 mg/day together with the normal 50 mal with a FBP binding agent is not a synergistic or
`dosing of GAR-transformylase inhibitor such as lomet-
`potentiating effect. Rather, by having substantially
`bound the folate binding protein with a FBP binding
`rexol.
`Based upon the relative binding constants for the
`agent prior to administration of the GAR-transformy-
`lase inhibitor or other antifolate, the toxic effects of
`respective compounds, it will be expected that approxi-
`mately 1 mg/day to 90 mg/day (preferably approxi- 55 such subsequent treatment are greatly reduced without
`mately 2-15 mg/day) of (6R)-5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahy-
`affecting the therapeutic efficacy.
`drofolic acid or about 5-300 mg/day (preferably about
`The effect of folic acid on GAR-transformylase in-
`10-50 mg/day) of (6R)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic
`hibitors has been demonstrated in standard tests com-
`acid, or their respective physiologically-available salt or
`monly utilized to determine the antitumor activity and
`ester thereof, will be employed with the GAR-transfor- 60 toxic effects of the GAR-transformylase inhibitors
`mylase inhibitor.
`themselves. In one such test, mice are inoculated with
`"Physiologically-available salt" refers to potassium,
`the C3H strain of mammary adenocarcinoma by insert-
`sodium, lithium, magnesium, or preferably a calcium
`ing a 2 mm by 2 mm section of tumor into the axillary
`salt of the FBP binding agent. "Physiologically-availa-
`region of the mice by trocar. In all experiments, lomet-
`ble ... ester" refers to esters which are easily hydro- 65 rexol was administered intraperitoneally once a day for
`lyzed upon administration to a mammal to provide the
`five consecutive days, starting on the day following
`corresponding FBP binding agent free acid, such as
`tumor implantation. Ten animals were used at each
`C 1-C4 alkyl esters, mixed anhydrides, and the like.
`dosage level. Antitumor activity was assessed on day
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1009-00004
`
`

`
`7
`ten by measuring the length and width of the tumor
`growth using vernier calipers, and the activity was
`expressed as a percent inhibition of tumor growth.
`When lometrexol was administered to infected mice
`which are maintained on a diet totally free of folic acid 5
`for two weeks prior to and during treatment, it exhib-
`ited moderate antitumor activity at very low doses, but
`also caused severe toxicity at a very low dose (measured
`as death of mice). These data are presented in Table II
`below.
`
`5,217,974
`
`8
`human dose of about 30 mg/day), good antitumor activ(cid:173)
`ity of lometrexol is observed at higher dose levels.
`These results are shown in Table IV below:
`TABLE IV
`
`Antitumor Activity and Toxicity of Lometrexol
`in c3H Mice after Two Weeks on Folate-Free Diet
`Plus Addition of 0.003% Folate to Drinking Water
`Lometrexol Dose Antitumor Activity
`Toxicity
`(% Inhibition)
`(mg/kg)
`(Mice Dead/Total Mice)
`IO ---6"-.2-5""-----9-l<J<-o------0-/-10---'--
`12.5
`89%
`25
`97%
`50
`96%
`
`TABLE II
`Antitumor Activity and Toxicity of Lometrexol
`in C3H Mice after Two Weeks on Folate-Free Diet
`Toxicity
`(Mice Dead/Total Mice) 15
`
`0110
`0/10
`0/10
`
`A test group of mice were maintained on a folic acid
`free diet for two weeks before treatment. Felic acid was
`then administered during the treatment by providing
`the animals drinking water containing 0.0003% folic
`acid (weight/volume). This concentration translates to
`about 1.75 mg of folic acid per square meter of body
`surface per day; since the animals consume about 4 ml
`of water each day.
`
`0.0003 grams
`lOOml.
`
`X -1..!!!L_ = 0.000012 grams
`day
`day
`
`0.012 milligrams
`day
`
`The average size of a mouse is 0.00687 m2
`
`0.012 grams X
`day
`
`1
`0.00687 ml
`
`= 1.75 mg/m2/day
`
`For a human subject of about I. 73 m2 size, this translates
`to an adult human dosage of about 3.0 mg/day. The
`effect of the foregoing folate dosage on the activity and
`toxicity of lometrexol is shown in Table III below:
`TABLE III
`Antitumor Activity and Toxicity of Lometrexol
`in C3H Mice after Two Weeks on Folate-Free Diet
`Plus Addition of 0.0003% Folate to Drinking Water
`Antitumor Activity
`Lometrexol Dose
`Toxicity
`(% Inhibition)
`(Mice Dead/Total Mice)
`(mg/kg)
`0/10
`13%
`0.125
`0/10
`26%
`0.25
`0/10
`48%
`0.5
`0/10
`97%
`1.0
`0/10
`98%
`2.0
`4/10
`99%
`4.0
`
`SO
`
`As the foregoing results indicate, addition of the indi(cid:173)
`cated level of folic acid to the diet of a subject receiving
`lometrexol results in excellent antitumor activity at low 60
`doses, with little or no toxic effects.
`Larger doses of folic acid appear to have an even
`more dramatic effect on the antitumor activity and
`toxicity of the GAR-transformylase inhibitor. For ex(cid:173)
`ample, when mice were maintained on a folate acid-free
`diet for two weeks before treatment with lometrexol,
`and then given water containing 0.003% (weight(cid:173)
`/volume) of folic acid (which translates to an adult
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1009-00005
`
`

`
`5,217,974
`
`9
`2. The method of claim 1 wherein the GAR-transfor(cid:173)
`mylase inhibitor is a pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine.
`3. The method of claim 2 wherein the GAR-transfor(cid:173)
`mylase inhibitor is lometrexol.
`4. The method of claim 1 wherein the folate binding
`protein binding agent is folic acid.
`5. The method of claim 3 wherein the folate binding
`protein binding agent is folfo acid.
`6. The method of claim 5 wherein the folic acid is
`administered at,a dose of about 0.5 mg/day to ab~ut 30
`mg/day.
`7. The method of claim 5 wherein the folic acid is
`administered at a dose of about 1 mg/day to about 5 15
`mg/day.
`8. A method for reducing mammalian toxicity of a
`GAR-transformylase inhibitor which binds to a folate
`binding protein consisting of administering a toxicity 2o
`reducing amount of a folate binding protein binding
`agent selected from folic acid, (6R)-5-methyl-5,6,7,8-
`tetrahydrofolic acid, and (6R)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahy(cid:173)
`drofolic acid, or a physiologically-available salt or ester
`. .
`. h h 25
`h
`I
`thereof, to t e mamma rece1vmg treatment wit
`t e
`GAR-transformylase inhibitor.
`9. The method of claim 8 wherein the GAR-transfor(cid:173)
`mylase inhibitor is a pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine.
`10. The method of claim 9 wherein the GAR-trans- 30
`formylase inhibitor is lometrexol.
`11. The method of claim 8 wherein the folate binding
`protein binding agent is folic acid.
`12. The method of claim 11 wherein folic acid is 35
`administered at a dose of about 0.5 mg/day to about 30
`mg/day.
`
`10
`13. The method of claim 12 wherein folic acid is
`administered at a dose of about 1 mg/day to about 5
`mg/day.
`14. The method of claim 8 wherein the folate binding
`5 protein binding agent is (6R)-5-methyl-5,6, 7,8-tetrahy(cid:173)
`drofolic acid or a physiologically-available salt or ester
`thereof.
`15. The method of claim 8 wherein the folate binding
`protein binding agent is (6R)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahy(cid:173)
`IO drofolic acid or a physiologically-available salt or ester
`thereof.
`16. A method for reducing the toxicity of a GAR-
`transformylase inhibitor or other antifolate which binds
`to a folate binding protein in a mammal which com(cid:173)
`prises pretreating the mammal with an amount of a
`folate binding protein binding agent selected from folic
`acid, (6R)-5-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid, and
`(6R)-5-formyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolic acid, or a physio(cid:173)
`logically available salt or ester thereof, sufficient to
`have substantially blocked the folate binding protein
`before administration of the antifolate.
`17. The method of claim 16 wherein the GAR-trans(cid:173)
`formylase inhibitor is lomotrexol.
`18. The method of claim 16 wherein the folate bind-
`ing protein binding agent is folic acid.
`19. The method of claim 18 wherein the folic acid is
`administered about 1 to about 24 hours prior to adminis(cid:173)
`tration of the antifolate.
`20. The method of claim 19 wherein a dose of about
`0.5 mg to about 30 mg of folic acid is administered.
`21. The method of claim 10 wherein the folate bind(cid:173)
`ing protein binding agent is folic acid, or a physiologi(cid:173)
`cally-available salt or ester thereof.
`22. The method of claim 17 wherein the folate bind(cid:173)
`ing protein binding agent is folic acid, or a physiologi(cid:173)
`cally-available salt or ester thereof.
`* * * * *
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1009-00006

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket