throbber
lENT
`
`9
`
`ANTIFOLATE DRUGS IN
`CANCER THERAPY
`
`Edited by
`ANN L. JACKMAN
`The Cancer Research Campaign Centre
`for Cancer Therapeutics,
`The Institute of Cancer Research,
`Sutton, Surrey, UK
`
`HUMANA PRESS
`TOTOWA, New JERSEY
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0001
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00001
`
`

`
`© 1999 Humana Press Inc.
`999 Riverview Drive, Suite 208
`Totowa, New Jersey 07512
`
`All rights reserved.
`
`No part of this book may be reproduced, stored ia a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means,
`electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise without written permission from the
`Publisher.
`
`All authored papers, comments, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations are those of the author(s), and do not
`necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
`
`For additional copies, pricing for buIk purchases, and/or information about other Humana titles, contact Humana at the
`above address or at any ofthe follow ng numbers Te 973-256-1699" Fax’ 973-~56-8341 ’ E-mail" humana@humanapr corn
`
`This publication is printed on acid-free paper. ~3
`ANSI Z39.48-1984 (American Standards Institute) Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials.
`
`Cover illustration:
`
`Cover design by Pairicia F. Cleary.
`
`Photocopy Authorization Policy:
`Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted
`by Humana Press Inc., provided that the base fee of US $5.00 per copy, plus US $00.25 per page, is paid directly to the
`Copyright Clearance Center at 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. For those organizations that have been
`granted a photocopy license from the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged and is acceptable to Humana
`Press Inc. The fee code for users of the Transactional Reporting Service is: [0-89603-460-7/97 $5.00 + $00.25].
`
`Printed in the United States ofAmerica. I0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
`
`t
`
`t
`
`r
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0002
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00002
`
`

`
`)yle et al.
`
`Effects of
`inhibitor
`
`). Phase I
`
`I trial of
`nuous in-
`
`12 Preclinical and Clinical Evaluation
`
`of the Glycinamide Ribonucleotide
`Formyltransferase Inhibitors
`Lometrexol and LY309887
`
`Laurane G. Menddsohn, John F. Worzalla
`andJackie M. Walling
`
`CONTENTS
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`INHIBITION OF GAR~ AND POLYGLUTAMATION BY
`
`FOLYLPOLYGLUTAMATE SYNTHETASE
`
`FOLATE-RECEPTOR SELECTIVITY OF ANTIFOLATES
`
`CELLULAR PHARMACOLOOY
`IN VIVO ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF LY309887
`THERAPEUTIC INDEX DETERMINATiONs
`
`THE EFFECT OF DIETARY FOLATE ON DISPOSITION OF LOMETREXOL
`AND LY309887 IN LIVER
`THE EFFECT OF LFD AND DIETARY I~OLATE SUPPLEMENTATION ON
`THE EFFICACY AND TOXICITY OF LOMETREXOL AND LY309887
`HUMAN FOLATE STATUS
`CLINICAL EVALUATION OF LOMETREXOL AND LY309887
`PHASE I STUDIES WITHOUT FOLIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
`PHASE I STUDIES WITH FOLIC ACID SUPPLEMENTATION
`PHASE I STUDY OF LOMETREXOL WITH FOLINIC ACID
`HOW DOES FOLIC ACID MODULATE TOXICITY?
`ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY IN PHASE I
`PHARMACOKINETICS
`CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LY309887
`CONCLUSION
`
`-
`
`From: Anticancer Drug Development Guide." Antifolate Drugs in Cancer Therapy
`Edited by: A.L. Jackman © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
`
`261
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0003
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00003
`
`

`
`Mendelsohn, Worzalla, and Walling~
`
`c~
`
`1. INTRODUCTION
`
`The importance of the purine de novo pathway in providing DNA precursors for can-
`cer cell growth led to the hypothesis that novel antifolate inhibitors of glycinamide ri-
`bonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT), the first folate-dependent enzyme in this
`pathway, might have utility in the treatment of cancer. In 1987, clinical investigations
`were initiated with lometrexol (6R-dideazatetrabydrofolic acid, 6R-DDATHF), a novel
`"tight-binding" inhibitor of GARFT with potent antitumor activity in a number of
`murine and human xenograft solid tumors. Unexpected observations of delayed cumu-
`lative toxicity in phase I clinical trials prompted extensive preclinical investigations of
`the dynamics of folate status on the efficacy and toxicity of GARFT inhibitors and other
`antifolates (_1). In addition, structure-activity studies have led to the identification of a
`second generation GARFT inhibitor, LY309887 (2’,5’-thienyl-dideazatetrahydrofolic
`acid), which is more potent than lometrexol and has greater antitumor efficacy in vivo
`(2). Biochemical and pharmacological differences between LY309887 and lometrexol
`with respect to potency to imhibit GARFT, differential transport and storage in liver, and
`polyglutamatiou suggest that LY309887 may have greater antitumor efficacy and more
`manageable toxicity in the clinic than lometrexol. A routine model of the delayed cu-
`mulative toxicity seen with lometrexol has been refined and characterized to provide
`greater understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pha~macodynamics of these events.
`In concert with recently published nutritional data on the folate status of humans and
`more sophisticated methods of assessing and modulating antifolate toxicities through vi-
`tamin supplementation, antifolate therapy may be poised to enter a new phase of clini-
`ca~ success. In this report, we describe LY309887, a GARFT inhibitor with unique
`biochemical and pharmacological properties that has antitumor activity against a broad
`panel of human xenograft tumors, and greater potency than lometrexol both as an in-
`hibitor of GARFT and as an inhibitor of tumor growth in vivo.’ An overview of the phase
`I clinical results with lometrexol and the design of the phase I clinical trial with
`LY309887 will be presented.
`
`2. INHIBITION OF GARFT
`AND POLYGLUTAMATION
`BY FOLYLPOLYGLUTAMATE SYNTHETASE
`
`The natural forms of folic acid and "classical" inhibitors of folate-dependent enzymes
`are polyglutamated intracellularly by the enzyme folylpolyglutamate synthetase. Poly-
`glutamylation enhances both intracellular retention and affinity of folates and gntifolates
`for many of the folate-utilizing enzymes (3). Table 1 summarizes the inhibition of
`GARFT by lometrexol, compound LY254155 (6R,S-2’,5’-thienyl-DDATHF, a di-
`astereoisomeric mix of LY309887 and LY309886, respectively) and theft- polygluta-
`mates. Monoglutamated LY254155 was approx 30-fold more potent than lometrexol.
`Polyglutamation enhanced inhibition by both compounds: lometrexol-triglutamate
`(LY235337) was approx 4.5-fold more potent than parent compound; a 10-fold increase
`in inhibition was seen with the triglutamated thiophene (LY314209). These data demon-
`strate that the thiophene was inherently more potent as a GARFT inhibitor and that in
`the polyglutamated state it achieved picomolar affinity for GARFT.
`The kinetic constants (Kin, Vmax, and first-order rate constant [Vmax!KmJ)’for activa-
`
`tior
`Tat
`eve
`util
`
`stYa
`obt~
`a fi~
`FP(
`cub
`HPI
`all ~
`vert
`in u
`serv
`at tr
`
`late
`ular
`cycl
`non
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0004
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00004
`
`

`
`Walling
`
`~or can-
`aide ri-
`in this
`gations
`a novel
`~ber of
`cumn-
`ions of
`d other
`an of a
`lrofolic
`in vivo
`etrexol
`er, and
`d more
`,ed cu-
`provide
`events.
`ns and
`agh vi-
`f clini-
`unique
`¯ broad
`an in-
`’,phase
`1 with
`
`zymes
`Poly-
`."olates
`ion of
`. adi-
`’gluta-
`xexol.
`amate
`erease
`:mon-
`fiat in
`
`.ctiva-
`
`Chapter 12 / Lometrexol and LY309887
`
`263
`
`Table 1
`Inhibition of hGARFT
`by Lometrexol, 254155, and Polyglutamates
`
`Compound No.
`
`Compound Name
`
`hGARFT Ki (nM)
`
`LY249543
`LY235540
`LY235337
`LY266978
`LY235542
`LY254155
`LY314565
`LY314209
`
`lometrexol
`diglu
`triglu
`tetraglu
`pentaglu
`thienyl-DDATHF
`diglu
`triglu
`
`59.7 (n = 2)
`15.4 (n = 2)
`13.3 (n = 2)
`7.1 _+ 2.2 (n = 4)
`5.3 (n = 2)
`2.1 -+ 0.2 (n = 5)
`1.2 (n = 1)
`0.25 (n = 2)
`
`The potency of antifolate analogs to inhibit monofunctional human GARFT
`was assessed spectrophometrically using the Morrison equa~on, which is appro-
`priate for determining the affinity of "tight-binding" compounds that produce sto-
`ichiometiic inhibition (2,4).
`
`Table 2
`Kinetic Constants for Activation of GARFT Inhibitors by FPGS
`
`Compound
`
`Km (IxM)
`
`Vmax (t~moles/h/mg)
`
`k "(Vm/Km)
`
`lometrexol
`LY309887
`MTA
`
`16.4 _+ 1.0
`6.5 _ 1.1
`1.9 + 0.5
`
`977 ----- 128
`-686 + 116
`. 725 +95
`
`60
`43
`381
`
`tion of lometrexol and LY309887, determined using hog liver FPGS are summarized in
`Table 2 (5). Lometrexol and LY309887 had similar Km values as FPGS substrates. How-
`ever, lometrexol had a significantly higher Vma~. The relative efficiencies of substrate
`utilization by an enzyme can be determined by comparing first-order rate constants, k’
`(Vrnax]Km). The data suggest that desPite equal Km values, lometrexol was a better sub-
`strate, which would be more extensively polyglutamated in vivo. For comparison, data
`obtained with the multitargeted antifolate inhibitor, LY231514 (MTA), is shown. With
`a first-order rate constant of 381, it clearly had the greatest affinity and efficacy as an
`FPGS substrate. In other experiments, polyglutamated products formed during a 24-h in-
`cubation of lometrexol, LY309887 or MTA with FPGS were separated by quantitative
`HPLC. At low substrate concentrations, i.e., below the Km (1 IxM), pob, glutamation of
`all substrates was more extensive and a higher percentage of the total product was con-
`vened to tetra- and pentaglutamated forms than at high substrate conqentrations (20 IxM)
`in which over 70% of each antifolate was present as the triglutamateanalog. These ob-
`servations are consistent with the known substrate inhibition of FPGS that occurs in vivo
`at high intracellular folate concentrations (6).
`An important inference from these data is that folate-deficient patients may accumu-
`late and retain greater amounts of highly polyglutamated "classical antifolates," partic-
`ularly in liver, a known folate depot, than patients who are folate-replete. Continuous
`cycling of stored antifolate through the enterohepatic pathway may explain the phe-
`nomenon of delayed and cumulative toxicity in cancer patients oo 10metrexol and in
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0005
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00005
`
`

`
`264
`
`Mendelsohn, Worzalla, and Walli.p__g
`
`Table 3
`Affinity of Folic Acid and Antifolates
`for Isoforms of the Folate Receptor
`
`Compound
`
`folic acid
`methotrexate
`lometrexol
`S-DDATHF
`raltitrexed
`LY309887
`LY309886
`LY231514
`5-CH:~-THF(6S)"
`
`Human KB cell
`( FR e~ )
`
`Ki (~M _+ SEM)
`Human Liver
`( FRf3 )
`
`Ratio
`Kit~/Kic¢
`
`0.07 _+ 0.11
`30.0 _+ 1(3.6
`0.29 -_+ 0.05
`0.20 -+ 0.07
`29.1 + 7.44
`1.74 -+ 0.18
`1.04 +- 0.31
`99.7 -+ 22.9
`1.00
`
`0.23 _+ 0.03
`108.00 _+ 4.4
`1.44 + 0.13
`0.82 _+ 0.01
`285.00 _+ 76.9
`18.2 _+ 4.4
`4.48 +-_ 0.36
`482.00 + 141
`55.0
`
`3.29
`3.6
`4.97
`4.10
`9.79
`10.5
`4.31
`4.83
`55.0
`
`Kic~ values were determined in equilibrium binding assays using 125I-folic
`acid and membranes prepared from human (KB) nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells
`or human liver. Values are the mean from three or more determinations.
`~FRe~, KB cell; FRI3, human placenta (9).
`
`lometrexol-treated mice on a low folate diet. Compound LY309887 may have a reduced
`potential for delayed toxicity in humans because it is less extensively polyglutamated.
`Furthermore, since it is a more potent GARFT inhibitor than lometrexol and requires less
`polyglutamation to achieve tight-binding inhibition, !ower-doses can be administered
`without compromising potency. Thus, in folate:replete patients having normal liver fo-
`late concentrations, accumulation, polyglutamation and retention of LY309887 in liver
`would be expec’ted to be lower than observed with lometrexol. In vivo experiments to
`test this hypothesis were carried out in mice and results are summarized in subheading
`7(5,7).
`
`3. FOLATE-RECEPTOR SELECTIVITY OF ANTIFOLATES
`
`Activation of classical antifolates through formation of polyglutamates and conse-
`quent deposition in liver may only partially account for the extended bioavailability and
`risk of delayed cumulative toxicity of classical antifolates. Folate-transport mechanisms,
`including the reduced folate carrier and folate receptor (FR) isoform-selectivity are im-
`portant features of antifolates that may also modulate clinical efficacy and toxicity of
`these compounds. It is noteworthy that FRc~ is highly overexpressed in many epithelial
`forms of cancer including ovarian and head and neck cancer (8). Dissociation constants
`of folic acid and several antifolates for the human FRot and FRI3 isoforms are presented
`in Table 3: The smaller the Ki, the more tightly the compound binds to the FR. Inspec-
`tion of the ratio of affinities of these antifolates for the isoforms reveals that all of the
`compounds have a lower affinity for the liver (FR[3) isoform relative to their FRc~ affin-
`ity. Such selectivity may enhance uptake of the natural folates, e.g., 5-CH3-THF into
`normal tissues or tumors over uptake into liver, particularly at physiological serum fo-
`late concentrations (10-40 nM). The affinity of lometrexol for both FR isoforms was
`very high, and the poor selectivity ratio of 4.97 suggests that lometrexol would readily
`
`c
`
`c
`
`f
`
`[
`
`d
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0006
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00006
`
`

`
`d Walling
`
`Chapter 12 / Lometrexol and LY309887
`
`265
`
`accumulate in human liver as well as tumors expressing FR. The affinity of LY309887
`for the liver receptor was 12.6-fold lower than lometrexol’s affinity and the selectivity
`of LY309887 for the ¢~ over the [3 isoform was 10.5, suggesting that this new compound
`will not accumulate in liver as much as !ometrexol. In addition to transport by FR, both
`lometrexol and LY309887 are taken up by the reduced folate carrier. This carrier, how-
`ever, has a high capacity but a tow affinity (>micromolar) for reduced folates. In vivo
`experiments in mice using radiolabeled lometrexol or LY309887 have confirmed these
`suggestions and these data are presented in Subheading 7.
`The clinical significance of these observations is relevant to the risk of delayed, cu-
`mulative toxicity. Murine studies have demonstrated that lometrexol is taken up and
`stored in the liver (10). It is thought that the clinical observations of delayed and cumu-
`lative toxicity may result from gradual release of stored lometrexol over time resulting
`in an extended "y-phase plasma half life (11). The affinity of LY309887 for liver folate
`receptors suggest that it is less likely to be transported into the liver, and, because it is
`less efficiently polyglutamated than lometrexol, it should not be retained in the liver as
`well. The greater potency of LY309887 to inhibit GARFT suggests that lower doses of
`this compound may be used. Collectively, these properties suggest that LY309887 may
`have a reduced risk of delayed toxicity in humans.
`
`4. CELLULAR PHARMACOLOGY
`
`LY309887 showed potent in vitro cytotoxicity (ICso of 2.9 ruk!) against CCRF-CEM
`leukemia cells and was approx fivefold more cytotoxic than lometrexol (ICs0 of 15.2
`~ (2). The cytotoxicity of both compounds was reversed by hypoxanthine, but not by
`thymidine. The cell cycle effects of LY309887 were evaluated Using the human
`leukemia cell line CCRF-CEM. Exposure of cells to 29 nM of this inhibitor for 24-96 h
`resulted ina slowed progression of cells through S-phase and an increase in the number
`of S-phase ceils (12). Measurement of deoxynucleotide pools demonstrated marked de-
`creases in dATP pools in these cells within 6 h of exposure (13).
`
`5. IN VIVO ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY OF LY309887
`
`reduced
`amated.
`ires less
`fistered
`iver lo-
`in liver
`~ents to
`reading
`
`The dose-response curves of LY309887 and lometrexol against the murine C3H
`corlge-
`mammary tumor are shown in Fig. 1. LY309887 demonstrated antitumor activity over a
`ity and
`broad dose range in this model with 94% tumor inhibition seen at 1 mg/kg/dose and up
`misms,
`to 99% inhibition seen at 100 mg/kg/dose. LY309887 was a more potent antitumor agent
`¯ re im-
`especially since lometrexol was dosed more frequently (q2d × 5) compared to
`city of
`LY309887 (dosed q3d × 4). Thus LY309887 showed 99% inhibition of tumor growth
`ithelial
`from 3 to 100 mg/kg/dose with acceptable toxicity (lethality <20% at all efficacious
`astants
`doses), whereas lometrexol showed 97% inhibition of tumor growtlrat 400 mg/kg/dose.
`:sented
`No lethality was noted at any of the doses of lometrexol including the 400 mg/kg dose,
`nspec-
`the highest dose tested for !ometrexol in this study.
`of the
`The antitumor activity of LY309887 (or LY254155, the mixture of its "6-R" and "6-
`: affin-
`S" stereoisomers) and lometrexo! (or the mixture of its "6-R" and "6-S" stereoisomers,
`~F into
`LY237147) in a number of preclinica! models is summarized in Table 4. Maximum in-
`hibition was obtained at doses producing 25% or less lethality. There were no significant
`differences in the maximum inhibition between the LY254155 isomers and lometrexol
`
`IS was
`eadily
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0007
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00007
`
`

`
`266
`
`Mendelsohn, Worzalla, and X~allin_~
`
`Table 4
`Antitumor Activity of GARFT Inhibitors
`
`Tk iopheneb
`
`DDA THF~
`

`Tumor
`
`CX-1 colon
`GC3 colon
`HC1 colon
`VRC5 colon
`LX-1 lung
`MX-1 mammary
`BXPC3 pancreatic
`PANC1 pancreatic
`
`6 R
`6 R,S
`diastereomer diastereomers
`LY309887
`LY254155
`
`95% (30)
`97% (30)
`86% (30)
`
`52% (10)
`
`92% (30)
`
`64% (40)
`96% (40)
`98% (40)
`96% (5)
`98% (10)
`61% (40)
`87% (40)
`85% (40)
`
`6R
`diastereomer
`LY249543
`(lometrexol)
`
`94% (200)
`99% (50)
`
`81% (I00)
`
`67% (300)~
`
`6 R,S
`diastereomers
`LY237147
`
`73% (100)
`98% (100)
`94% (200)
`99% (100)
`
`76% (100)
`59% (50)
`
`’~Compound dosed ip at the indicated dose (mg/kg) and schedule; e.g., for the CX-1 colon xenograft.
`6R,S-diastereomer was dosed ip q3d × 4 at 40 mg/kg.
`~Dose schedule: q3d × 4.
`LDose schedule: q2d × 5.
`
`Antitumor Activity of LY309887 vs.
`Lometrexol Against C3H Mammary Tumor
`Regular Diet -- 10 Days After First Dose
`100- : ÷++ . . . .... - ~ ,/:~. ,~,,~, .... 100
`
`activity
`
`.80 ~
`
`w
`
`rn
`
`c(
`re
`al
`W
`
`m
`th,
`,60-- ~
`
`LY309887 Dosed I.P, "
`q3dx4
`
`d ~..~
`
`~
`40 ~
`Lometrexol Dosed I,P.
`q2d x 5 ~
`
`~
`
`~
`: 40.
`~
`--
`
`20-
`
`25% Le~all~
`/
`
`0.0o 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 500
`Drug Dosage (mg/kg)
`
`~ig. ]. Andtu~or Activity of L~309887 vs. Lome/~exo] Against C3~ ~a~m~ Tumor.
`
`isomers. Against the LX-1 lung, VRC5, HC1, and GC3 colon xenografts, both the
`LY309887 and lometrexol produced over 80% tumor inhibition. Against the MX-1
`mammm-y and CX-1 colon, both the thiophene isomers and lometrexol produced be-
`tween 60% and 80% inhibition. In these studies, the thiopfiene analogs were dosed q3d
`× 4 while IometrexoI was dosed q2d X 5.
`The ability of LY254155 to prevent tumor regrowth of the human colon xenograft
`
`xe
`
`co
`
`ap,
`hu
`sht
`of
`He
`tail
`EE
`lov
`ina
`pec
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0008
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00008
`
`

`
`:[ Wallin~
`
`Chapter 12 / Lometrexol and LY309887
`
`267
`
`Regrowth Study LY254155 (Thiophene Mixture of
`"6-R" & "6-S" Isomers) Against HC1 Human
`Colon Xenograft - Dosed I.P. q3d x 4
`
`10000=
`
`g lOOO,
`
`100=
`
`..r.o"~3 ontrols
`
`,A" 2.5 mg/kg
`
`5 rng/kg,. #
`
`10"
`14
`
`21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84
`Days Since Therapy Initiated
`Fig. 2. Regrowth Study LY254155 (Thiophene Mixture of "6-R" & "6-S" Isomers) Against HC 1 Hu-
`man Colon Xenograft.
`
`was investigated (Fig. 2). A single course of LY254155 (mixture of"6-R" and "6-S" iso-
`mers of the thiophene) was given starting 14 d after inoculation with the HC1 human
`colon xenograft. At the lowest doses, tumor growth was slowed; at higher doses tumor
`regrowth was prevented for at least 42 d. The highest dose of 40 mg/kg in this study was
`also very effective, but two of the seven mice died (>25% lethality), and thus this data
`was not included. At the 10 mg/kg dose, three of six mice were tumor free, and at the 20
`mg/kg dose~ four of six mice were tumor free 39 d after’completion of a single course of
`therapy.
`Similar results were obtained using GC3 xenograft tumors. Thus for two colon
`xenograft models, the LY254155 prevented growth of tumor for periods of 4-7 wk, and
`in one of these tumor models, the HC1 colon tumor, a single course of the thiophene re-
`suited in a majority of mice being tumor free more than 5 wk after the therapy had been
`completed.
`
`6. THERAPEUTIC INDEX DETERMINATIONS
`
`The activities of LY309887 and lometrexol were compared using calculations of ther-
`apeutic index ranges for the two drugs. For this comparison, both drugs were tested in
`human xenograft tumor models (dosing schedule: q3d × 4). Ideally these comparisons
`should be made using tumor models in which both drugs were higlily active. The ratio
`of LDio divided by the ED9o would give therapeutic indices relevant to clinical safety.
`However, in some tumor models, a maximal tumor growth inhibition of 70% was ob-
`tained. Therefore, calculations of therapeutic index were based on the ratio of LDlo to
`ED7o (2). Calculations of therapeutic indices using ED9o values would give slightly
`lower values. The LDlo for these studies was assessed in nontumor-bearing mice to elim-
`inate uncertainty regarding cause of death, i.e., from tumor burden vs drug toxicity, es-
`pecially since lethality resulting from antifolate toxicity was delayed for many days:
`
`)/T/ers
`1_47
`
`100)
`lOO)
`200)
`100)
`
`lOO)
`~o)
`
`.enografl,
`
`}th the
`MX-1
`ed be-
`.’d q3d
`
`.ograft
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0009
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00009
`
`

`
`268
`
`Mendelsohn, Worzalla, and Walling
`
`c
`
`Table 5
`Estimates of Therapeutic Indexa Ranges for LY309887
`and Lometrexol Based on Ratio of LDi0/EDT0
`
`LY309887 Lometrexol (LY249543)
`
`PANC- 1 pancreatic
`LX-1 lung
`MX-1 mammaxy
`HC1 colon
`VRC5 colon
`
`10--30
`3-10
`1-3
`3-10
`3-10
`
`3-10
`1-3
`1-3
`1-3
`3
`
`~Therapeutic index range:
`(e.g., for LY309887 against PANC-1 = LDIo!EDvo = (30-100 mg/kg)/(3
`mg/kg) = 10-30
`All values for LDm and EDvo based on q3d X 4 ip dosing with regular diet.
`LDlo values determined in C3H female mice.
`ED7o values determined in CDI Nu/Nu mice.
`
`Lethality was determined in C3H mice which were used for testing murine tumor mod-
`els. However, the human xenograft models utilized CD1 Nu/Nu mice. Thus the thera-
`peutic index calculations use efficacy data from this strain of mouse.
`Compound LY309887 was more potent than lometrexol in producing antitumor ac-
`tivity in several-rm0"~dels, and it also was more potent in producing lethality in mice. In
`the PANC-1 pancreatic tumor and the LX-1 human lung xenografts, LY309887 was
`about 100 times more potent in its antitumor activity compa[ed to lometrexol when both
`were dosed q3d × 4. The LDlo for LY309887 was betWeen 30 and 100 mg/kg, whereas
`for lometrexol, an LDm between 1000 and 3000 mg/kg was obtained. Thus, LY309887
`was approx 30 times more potent for producing lethality .in mice compared to lome-
`trexol. Estimates of therapeutic indices were calculated as shown in Table 5. In PANC-
`1 pancreatic, LX-1 lung, HC1 colon, and VRC5 colon xenograft tumor models,
`preliminary estimates of therapeutic index showed an approx threefold greater thera-
`peutic index for LY309887 compared to lometrexol. In MX-1 mammary tumors, both
`compounds were less active, and there was no difference in therapeutic index in this tu-
`mor model.
`
`7. THE EFFECT OF DIETARY FOLATE
`ON DISPOSITION OF LOMETREXOL AND LY309887 IN LIVER
`
`In phase I clinical trials with lometrexol, unexpected delayed and cumulative toxicity
`in patients was encountered (1). The observed toxicities, mucositis and myelosupres-
`sion, are classically associated with antifolate therapy. However, the duration of toxic-
`ity following a single-drug dose and the cumulative nature of the toxicity were novel
`observations of antifolate toxicity. It was hypothesized that cancer patients may be
`marginal in their folic acid stores. To this end, a folate-deficient murine model was es-
`tablished to characterize biochemical and pharmacological effects of low dietary folat~
`(LFD) on the efficacy and delayed toxicity of antifolate inhibitors.
`In mice receiving a LFD for 2 wk, Schmitz et al. showed that folate pools were re-
`duced in plasma, liver, intestine, and tumors (14). In addition, significant changes were
`noted in the density of FR in tumors and liver and in the isoforms expressed in tumors
`
`Fi
`
`()
`
`ol
`
`L
`ui
`
`P~
`
`8
`C
`
`3(
`th
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0010
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00010
`
`

`
`t Walling
`
`Chapter 12 / Lometrexol and LY309887
`
`269
`
`-13-- Lometrexol Standard Diet
`
`--d-- Lometrexol Low Folate Diet
`
`"-G’- LY309887 Standard Diet
`
`~ LY309887 Low Folate Diet
`
`2500 -
`
`2000.
`
`500
`
`O,
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80 t00
`
`120 140 160 t80
`
`Time(hours)
`
`Fig. 3. Total Disposition of [14C]-lometrexol and [14C]-LY309887 in Murine Liver.
`
`(15). Increases in tumor and liver FPGS activity were also noted (16). Whole-body au-
`toradiography studies in mice on standard diet or LFD receiving either [14C]-lometrexol
`or [14C]-LY’309887 demonstrated significantly higher accumulation of drug in livers of
`mice on LFD (]0, 7). The accumulation and polyglutamation state of lometrexol and
`LY309887 in livers of mice on SD and LFD were compared by dosing mice iv with eq-
`uitoxic doses (LDso doses in LFD mice) of radiolabeled parent compound. The total ac-
`cumulation of each drug in liver.was determined over a 7-d period (Fig. 3).
`Polyglutamates were also determined by reversed-phase HPLC (7).
`Regardless of diet, more lometrexol accumulated in murine liver than LY309887.
`Furthermore, animals on LFD accumulated roughly 6-10-fold more drag than animals
`on SD and clearance of drug from livers of LFD mice was slower than clearance from
`SD mice. Polyglutamation profiles showed that on SD, the most common metabolite af-
`ter 24-h for both drugs was pentaglutamate (80-90%). In mice on LFD receiving
`LY309887, penta- and hexa-glutamyl-metabolites were still the predominant forms; 70
`and 30%, respectively. In contrast, lometrexol was polyglutamated mgre extensively: an
`additional percentage, approx 15%, was recovered as the septa- and octa-glutamyl forms
`(17).
`
`8. THE EFFECT OF LFD AND DIETARY FOLATE SUPPLEMENTATION
`ON THE EFFICACY AND TOXICITY OF LOMETREXOL AND LY309887
`
`In mice on a LFD for 2 wk, the toxicity of lometrexol and LY309887 ine?eased
`300-1000-fold. Antitumor activity cannot be assessed because of the lethality of
`these agents. Oral supplementation with folic acid (0.6-600 mg/kg) restores sensitivity
`
`?r mod-
`e thera-
`
`mor ac-
`nice. In
`87 was
`en both
`vhereas
`309887
`) lome-
`PANC-
`nodels,
`: thera-
`:s, both
`this tu-
`
`oxicity
`supres-
`." toxic-
`’, novel
`nay be
`vas es-
`r folate
`
`ere re-
`’,s were
`tumors
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0011
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00011
`
`

`
`270
`
`Mendelsohn, Worzalla, and Walling,
`
`Ch
`
`to the antitumor activity of both GARFT inhibitors. High doses of folic acid (>600
`mg/kg) eliminated both toxicity and antitumor activity.
`The therapeutic indexes (LDlo/ED90) of LY309887 and lometrexol were determined
`over a range of supplemental folic acid doses in two antitumor models, the human
`xenograft GC3 colon and the routine mammary tumor C3H (Table 6). The data show
`that increasing folic acid supplementation doses from 0.0 to 6-15 mg/kg/d resulted in an
`enhanced therapeutic index ranging from 6 to 60 for LY309887 in both models. Fur,
`thermore, the ability to delay regrowth of the GC3 tumors over a broad dose range was
`only seen at the higher doses of folate supplementation. A small but modest increase in
`lometrexol’s therapeutic index to 2-5 was also observed. Higher doses of folic acid sup-
`plementation resulted in less robust increases in the therapeutic index.
`
`9. HUMAN FOLATE STATUS
`
`The folate status of cancer patients has not been systematically evaluated. However,
`early studies reported decreased serum folio acid activity in patients with metastatic can-
`cer (18-20). Other investigators have demonstrated decreased urinary clearance of a
`folic-acid load (21,22). Saleh et al. demonstrated that patients with metastatic disease in-
`corporated more folic acid into their reduced folate pools, had decreased catabolism of
`folate and more rapid clearance of serum folate than controls even in the presence of
`maintained serum 5-CH3-THF concentrations (22). They concluded that patients were
`folate deficient and that there was an increased demand for folate in patients with ma-
`lignant disease. In these patients, variability in the metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and
`toxicity of classical antifolates compared to humans with normal folate status would not
`be unexpected. Furthermore, dietary supplementation with folic acid may "normalize"
`the dose response.for achieving antitumor activity and reduce, toxicity to normal tissues
`by restoring folate pools in tissues having low folate requirements, without meeting the
`high folate demands of rapidly dividing tumor cells.
`The biochemical pathways that utilize folate cofactors also require adequate amounts
`of vitamins B I2 and B6. Thus, the status of all three vitamins in patients may significantly
`influence the severity of toxicity observed during chemotherapy. R. Allen and his col-
`leagues have established that measuring specific amino acid metabolites, especially ho-
`mocysteine, N-methyl glycine and others, from these metabolic pathways provides a
`more sensitive and reliable assessment of patient vitamin status (23). These surrogate in-
`dicators of functional folate status are more indicative of deficiencies and more respon-
`sive to dietary supplementation.
`
`10. CLINICAL EVALUATION OF LOMETREXOL AND LY309887
`
`Cancer chemotherapy was born in 1948 with the discovery that the antifolate an-
`timetabolite aminopterin, an inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), induced re-
`missions in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (24). Over the last 50 yr,
`intensive structure-activity studies directed at the folate pathway led initially to the iden-
`tification of methotrexate (25), also an inhibitor of DHFR, and 5 fluorouracil (5FU) an
`inhibitor of the enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS) (26). More recently a number of pure
`
`TS
`den
`dict
`witl
`met
`CB:
`has
`of c
`eral
`vek
`mul
`pm-i
`ter c
`bios
`aste
`kno
`basi
`testi
`tire
`sch~
`pha.,
`beer
`tion
`ducl
`lom~
`scrit
`
`Sandoz Inc.
`Exhibit 1012-0012
`
`Teva – Fresenius
`Exhibit 1012-00012
`
`

`
`~Tallin~
`
`(>600
`
`mined
`human
`t show
`dinah
`s. Fur-
`ge was
`:ase in
`,d sup-
`
`¢¢ever,
`ic can-
`e of a
`ase in-
`ism of
`nce of
`~ were
`:h ma-
`:s, and
`fld not
`talize"
`issues
`ng the
`
`lounts
`cantly
`is col-
`ly ho-
`ides a
`ate in-
`’.spon-
`
`tO an-
`ed re-
`30 yr,
`iden-
`U) an
`f pure
`
`Chapter 12 / Lometrexol and LY309887
`
`271
`
`Table 6
`Effect of Increasing Folic Acid Supplementation on the
`Therapeutic Index
`
`Tkerapeutic Index
`
`Folate Supplement
`mg~g/d
`
`Z~lmor
`
`GC3 colon
`
`C3H mammary
`
`n.d.: not determined.
`
`LY309887
`
`0
`3 (2,4)
`25 (25,25)
`60
`n.d.
`0
`1.4 (1.3,1.5)
`9 (6, 12)
`6
`n.d.
`
`LD l o/EDgo
`lometrexol
`
`0
`0.6
`1.5
`n.d.
`2
`0
`2
`5
`n.d.
`1
`
`none
`0.6
`6.0
`15.0
`60.0
`none
`0.6
`6
`15
`60
`
`TS inhibitors have been studied, the lead compound being CB3717. Despite initial evi-
`dence of activity (27,28), this compound failed in the clinic largely because of unpre-
`dictable renal toxicity, which was thought to result from crystallization of the compound
`within the kidney (27). The replacement of the l’-amino and 10 propargyl groups to a
`methyl group and the replacement of the l’,4’-phenyleneto 2’,5’-thienyl bioisostere on
`CB3717 gave a more potent and soluble TS inhibitor, raltitrexed (ZD1694). Raltitrexed
`has recently been shown in randomized comparative trials to be active in the treatment
`of colorectal cancer. These studies have led to the granting of a product license in sev-
`eral countries including the U.K. Other antifolate antimetabolites are currently under de-
`velopment including the 5FU prodrugs, capecitabine (29) and UFT (30), and the
`multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514) (31-33). However, no specific inhibitors of
`purine biosynthesis are yet utilized in routine clinical practice. The first molecule to en-
`ter clinical trials that was directed at inhibition of an enzyme essential for de novo purine
`biosynthesis, glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase (GARFT), was the 6R di-
`astereomer of dideazatetrahydrofolic acid (DDATHF), an analog of tetrahydrofolate,
`known as lometrexol (34,35)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket