throbber
au: VMiedical AYT
`ofAustralia
`
`February 3, 1986
`Vol. 144, No. 3
`
`
`
`JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
`
`
`WCALTLLOR
`McALITA SC)
`
`
`
`LEADING ARTICLES) jiversity
`
`Relinquishing ‘mothers: [)r..
`THERAPEUTICS
`
`Single-dose therapy in the
`Gordon Parker.
`Aa i
`Compliance with asthmathe
`managementof urinary tract
`
`in paediatric practice.
`infections. Judith A. Whitworth __136
`
`
`Side-effects of corticosteroid
`David R. Lines
`
`# agents. J. Paul Seale,
`Bicycle accidents.
`
`Douglas Cohen 2 ===414
`. PRUE te As aalete l9eeeaecaec
`
`Informational needs for the
`
`- effective prevention of accidents
`MEDICAL MISCELLANY
`in childhood. Graham Vimpani,
`Frederick Ill of Germany.
`John Pearn, Jerry Moller_____——115
`James H. Leavesley_ i143
`
`ORIGINAL ARTICLES
`CASE REPORTS
`Psychological disability in women
`Child cyclist injuries: a
`whorelinquish a baby for
`prospective study.
`adoption. John T. Condon____117
`Christopher J. Armson,
`Effects of intervention on
`Clifford W. Pollard.
`medication compliancein children
`Pathological rupture of the spleen
`with asthma. Nerida A. Smith,
`in transforming non-Hodgkin’s
`J. Paul Seale, Philip Ley, John Shaw,
`lymphoma. JamesD.Griffiths,
`Peter U, Bracs2.4. 4g
`Jue Chong Ding, Surender K. Juneja,
`Intrapulmonary coin lesions: the
`Robert J.S. Thomas, John J. Martin,
`changingpatterns.
`lan AzCooperaaoa
`146
`David B. Francis,
`A case of uridine diphosphate
`Paul V. Zimmerman________——122
`galactose-4-epimerase
`Glucagon and ureteric calculi.
`deficiency detected by neonatal
`David R. Webb,
`lan N. Nunn,
`screening for galactosaemia.
`Donald McOmish, William S.C. Hare 124
`Francis G. Bowling,
`Effective palliation of melanoma
`David K.B. Fraser, Alan E. Clague,
`with procarbazine and radio-
`Alan Hayes, Darryl J. Morris____150
`therapy given by a low-dose
`Acute, severe hepatitis due to
`fractionation schedule.
`Coxiella burneti infection.
`P. Grantley Gill, Richard L. Abbott,
`Raymond P. Kelly, David J. Byrnes,
`Ash Ahmad, Joan Zeicmanis___126
`denniferTurnerweSY
`Major hepatic resection for
`neoplasia: the Concord Hospital
`H Boua iVed ES
`DEPARTMENTS,
`experience. Patrick C. Cregan,
`
`John W. Hollinshead, David J. Gillett 128
`Notice Board Madisan
`
`| Meetings or
`
`158
`Obituaries; «.:
`Q
`
`159
`Book Reviews
`LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:
`163
`
`signe nner
`vier
`ieee
`eR eae es
`MA
`sce berE>
`
`
`
`POINT OF VIEW
`Psychiatry, compensation and
`rehabilitation. Fiona K. Judd,
`Graham D. Burrows__1:3
`
`a Registered by Australia Post. Publication No. NBG 0038.
`
`
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2069
`Mylan v. Janssen IPR2016-01332
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2069
`Mylan v. Janssen IPR2016-01332
`
`

`

`Therapeutics|139
`THE MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA Vol. 144 February 3, 1986
`
`ste
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Side-effects of corticosteroid agent
`
`ABSTRACT Anti-inflammatory cortico-
`teroid drugs are powerful therapeutic agents
`for a wide range of disorders. However, they
`lo have recognized side-effects, most of
`which are related to the dose and the duration
`of therapy. Thus, short courses of even high
`doses of corticosteroid drugs have very few
`adverse effects. A detailed knowledge of the
`long-term side-effects of corticosteroid agents
`and their incidence will assist the physician
`in making informed judgements on the poten-
`tial benefits of treatment with these drugs.
`(Med J Aust 1986; 144: 139-142)
`
`F
`
`he developmentofcorticosteroid agents
`represented a major advance in the
`treatment of numerous inflammatory
`diseases of varying causes; regrettably,
`their
`widespread use must be tempered by an
`appreciation of their side-effects, which occur
`commonly. As with any potent
`therapeutic
`agents, the prescribing of corticosteroid therapy
`should be guided by a careful consideration of
`its perceived benefits and potential risks. This
`article will
`review the unwanted effects of
`systemically administered anti-inflammatory
`corticosteroid agents.
`the complications of
`In general, any of
`corticosteroid agents are related to the dose and
`the duration of therapy.’ Thus, mostof the well
`known problems will arise only during long-
`term treatment. Onthe other hand, remarkably
`few. adverse effects are associated with short
`courses of corticosteroid drugs,
`even in
`relatively high doses! In view of this clear
`distinction, short-term andlong-termtreatments
`will be considered separately.
`\
`Since prednisone, prednisolone
`and
`methylprednisolone are the most commonly
`usedcorticosteroid agents, most ofthe available
`clinical data on side-effects concern these drugs.
`Sound reasonsexist for the administration of one
`of these agents in preference to the more potent
`corticosteroid drugs, such as dexamethasone and
`betamethasone. Prednisone, prednisolone and
`its methyl analogue have less mineralocorticoid
`activity than doescortisol, so their propensity
`to retain sodium and water will be less than that
`of cortisol. In addition, their biological half-lives
`are of intermediate duration (12-36 hours),
`allowing a once-a-day dosage
`regimen.
`Furthermore, a patient’s daily requirements can
`easily be obtained from the rangeofthe available
`tablets and this facilitates the process oftitrating
`dosage against disease to find the minimum dose
`
`
`the disease.that will control In contrast,
`“Fifth article in an occasional series on therapy with
`corticosteroid agents.
`
`Department of Pharmacology, The University
`of Sydney, NSW 2006.
`J. Paul Seale, PhD, FRACP, Associate Professor in
`Clinical Pharmacology.
`Mark R. Compton, BSc, Research Assistant.
`Reprints will not be available from the authors. The
`series of articles on corticosteroid therapy will be
`published later in booklet form.
`
`J. Paul Seale and Mark R. Compton
`
`although dexamethasone and betamethasone are
`virtually devoid of mincralocorticoid activity,
`they have much longer biological half-lives
`(36-54 hours) which are responsible for their
`profound suppression of the hypothalamic—
`pituitary—adrenalaxis. Also, the available tablet
`strengths do notallow for the samefinetitration
`of minimal daily dosage that is possible with
`prednisone and prednisolone.
`
`Short-term therapy
`Dosesof up to 100 mg of prednisone a day may
`be taken for three weeks or less without any
`great risk ofthe occurrence of adverseeffects.
`Occasionally, patients may notice weight gain,
`mild fluid retention, insomnia or mood changes
`(euphoria, depression or,
`rarely, psychosis).
`Adverse psychiatric reactions are morelikely to
`occur in patients with pre-existing psychological
`problems.2. The metabolic
`actions of
`corticosteroid drugs may lead to hyper-
`glycaemia,
`to ketoacidosis in diabetic indi-
`viduals
`and to hypokalaemia. Superficial
`punctuate ulcerations ofthe gastric mucosa and
`associated haemorrhage may also occur!
`However, these effects are reversed when the
`drugs are discontinued. A rare but serious
`complicationof the intravenous administration
`of corticosteroid drugs in asthmatic patients is
`the development of anaphylactoid reactions;
`these may be difficult to differentiate from an
`exacerbation of asthma?
`Short courses of high-dose corticosteroid
`agents may producetransient abnormalities of
`the hypothalamic—pituitary—adrenal axis such as
`reduced basal plasma concentrations of cortisol,
`diminished adrenal gland responsesto adreno-
`corticotrophin (ACTH) and blunted responses
`to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia.* Two days
`after the administration of prednisolone (25 mg
`twice a dayfor five days), the cortisol responses
`of 10 normal mento both the induction of hypo-
`glycaemia and the administration of synthetic
`ACTH were reduced to about one-half their
`previouslevels. In a studyof seven patients with
`chronic airflow obstruction, who were given
`prednisolone (20 mg twice a day for three
`weeks), basal plasmacortisol and plasma ACTH
`concentrations were suppressed at
`the com-
`pletion of treatment but returned to normal
`values within four days. Thus, it is evident that
`corticosteroid therapy can affect hypothalamic—
`pituitary—adrenal function within a few days of
`its commencement, even though the dysfunction
`usually disappears rapidly once treatment has
`been ceased.
`that patients
`Since these findings suggest
`theoretically may be at risk if they encounter
`stress within a few days of the abrupt discon-
`tinuation of corticosteroid therapy,
`it may be
`preferable to withdraw an agent gradually over
`five to seven days. For some inflammatory
`disorders,
`it may be necessary to reduce the
`
`dosage of a corticosteroid drug over a longer
`period of time to prevent recrudescenceof the
`disease. Whetever possible, once-a-day
`regimens should be prescribed, since they are
`more likely to result in rapid recovery of the
`hypothalamic—pituitary-adrenal
`axis when
`corticosteroid therapy is ceased.6
`Awarenessof the transient disturbances which
`mayoccur with short-term courses of cortico-
`steroid agents will ensure that these potent drugs
`are used safely and effectively.
`
`Long-term therapy
`It is with prolongedtreatment that the unwanted
`effects, well known both to medical practitioners
`and to the lay public, are likely to be encoun-
`tered. In general,
`the lower the maintenance
`dose of a corticosteroid agent, the less the risk
`of side-effects.
`In adults, it is likely that daily doses in excess
`of 10 mg ofprednisone will eventually lead to
`some side-effects.’ It
`is probable that even
`smaller daily doses (for example, 7.5 mg of
`prednisone),
`if taken in the long term, are
`associated with complications in the elderly
`Thus, it is not possibleto stipulate a daily dose
`at whichthe risk of side-effects is non-existent.
`Hypertension
`salt-retaining properties of
`Although the
`prednisone and prednisolone are less than those
`of cortisol, these synthetic corticosteroid agents
`maystill cause hypernatraemia, fluid retention
`and hypertension. In addition, other mechan-
`isms, such as the enhancementof the vasocon-
`strictor effects of endogenous substances and
`increased concentrations of renin substrate? have
`been postulated as contributing to the hyper-
`tensive effects of glucocorticoid hormones.
`These effects are probably related to the dose
`since long-term low-dose therapy does notcarry
`any appreciable risk. In a study of 129 patients
`with chronic airflow obstruction who were tak-
`ing prednisone or prednisolone (mean daily dose
`+ SD, 6.7 + 3.3 mg for 9.7 + 5.5 years) and
`66 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were
`taking prednisone or prednisolone (8.4 + 2.7 mg
`for 8.4 +2.7 years),
`there was a small,
`statistically significant increase in systolic blood
`pressure without a
`significant
`increase in
`diastolic blood pressure.’ However, multiple
`regression analysis showed that an increased
`systolic blood pressure level correlated with age
`and blood pressure before therapy, which
`suggested that
`these factors were the main
`determinants of increases in systolic blood
`pressure. It was concluded that low doses of
`prednisone or prednisolone are not important
`causes of hypertension.
`In the elderly, the incidence of elevated blood
`pressure maybehigher. Fifteen of 100 patients
`(aged 69 years or more) who were taking pred-
`nisolone (12.5 mg a day orless) for an average
`of 4.8 years developed hypertension (defined as
`
`

`

`[Therapeutics
`February 3, 1986 Vol. 144 THE MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
`a diastolic blood pressure of greater
`than
`5 mmHgora systolic blood pressure ofgreater
`than 180 mmHg), compared with three of 100
`age-matched and sex-matched controls. The
`precise mechanisms by whichelderlypatients
`develop hypertension, and other side-effects of
`corticosteroid therapy, such as osteoporosis,
`more
`readily than others have not been
`elucidated. One possible contributoryfactor may
`be the increased plasma concentration of
`unbound corticosteroid drug due to the lower
`serum albumin level
`in the elderly."
`Electrolyte disturbances
`Since prednisone and prednisolone retain some
`mineralocorticoid activity,
`they increase the
`distal renal tubular reabsorption of sodium in
`exchange
`for potassium, hydrogen and
`ammonium ions which may lead to hypernat-
`raemia and hypokalaemia in someindividuals.!2
`In large doses, corticosteroid drugs may cause
`hypokalaemic alkalosis. However, alkalosis may
`develop in somepatients without any evidence
`of potassiumdepletion, suggesting that increases
`in serum bicarbonate levels may be a direct
`cffect of corticosteroid therapy.!?
`Osteoporosis
`Patients who receive prolonged therapy with
`greater than physiological doses ofcorticosteroid
`agents tend to develop some degree of osteo-
`porosis. Glucocorticoid agents decrease bone
`formation owing to a direct inhibition of osteo-
`blastic
`activity and they
`increase bone
`resorption, which leads to loss of bone —
`preferentially that of trabecular bone in the spine
`and
`ribs! Bone
`resorption occurs
`as
`a
`consequence of secondary hyperparathyroidism,
`which is caused by corticosteroid-induced
`hypercalciuria and inhibition of enteral calcium
`absorption? Not all patients develop osteo-
`porosis, but postmenopausal womenand elderly
`or immobilized patients are at high risk of this
`complication. Since current pharmacological
`approaches at best halt, rather than reverse,
`corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, one should
`aim to detect
`this problem before serious
`complications such as compression fractures of
`the vertebral column have occurred. While the
`reliable detection of carly changes requires
`sophisticated techniques
`such as photon
`absorptiometry, plain x-rayfilms of the spine
`may also provide useful
`information. Once
`patients at risk have beenidentified, prophylaxis
`with vitamin D and calcium supplements, or
`vitamin D and hydrochlorothiazide therapyif
`hypercalciuria
`is present,
`should
`be
`considered.'? Since no proofyet exists that such
`a programmeofprophylaxis is effective, therapy
`should be embarked upon in preference to
`witnessing the
`relentless progression of
`osteoporosis
`in
`susceptible individuals.
`Alternate-day treatment, which reduces the
`incidence of some of
`the
`side-effects of
`corticosteroid drugs, would appear to have no
`advantage over daily use in terms of
`the
`development of osteopenia.'4
`Cutaneous effects
`Easybruising, purpura and ecchymoses, which
`are quite commonin older patients on long-term
`
`corticosteroid treatment, typically involve the
`face and neck, the extensor surfaces of the arms
`and the hands andthe areas below the knees.
`Although the mechanism is not clearly under-
`stood,
`it
`is
`thought
`to be related to the
`diminished phagocytosis of extravasated blood
`and changes in connective tissue.!2 Hirsutism has
`been reported in approximately 10% ofpatients
`and depends on the duration of treatment.5
`Acneiformlesionsthat affect the face and upper
`trunk may occur in a minority of patients on
`long-term therapy.!?
`Growth impairment
`In children,
`long-term use of corticosteroid
`agents inhibits linear bone growth and epi-
`physeal closure, reducing skeletal growth. To
`facilitate the early detection of growth retarda-
`tion it is essential that regular measurements of
`height and weight are plotted on percentile
`charts. Fortunately, accelerated growth backto
`the child’s height percentile usually follows the
`cessation of corticosteroid therapy as the ad-
`ministration of corticosteroid drugs also inhibits
`epiphyseal closure. However, this growth catch-
`up maynot occur after long-term use of high-
`dose corticosteroid therapy,
`leaving the child
`permanently stunted.
`If
`single doses of
`prednisone or prednisolone, which have a
`relatively short biological half-life, are taken in
`the morning, this regimenisleast likelyto affect
`the maximalsecretion of growth hormdnein the
`early hours of the morning.'¢
`Glucose intolerance
`impair carbohydrate
`Glucocorticoid agents
`metabolism by increasing hepatic gluconeo-
`genesis and by decreasing the utilization of
`glucose by various tissues.'? Fasting blood
`glucose concentrations are within normal ranges
`in most patients who are taking corticosteroid
`drugs but usually some reduction in the ability
`to respond to a glucose load is present, with a
`pattern in a glucose tolerance test
`that
`is
`indicative of insulin resistance. This impairment
`of glucose tolerance is greatest when cortico-
`steroid treatment begins and the response
`improves
`considerably during long-term
`therapy.'7 The developmentof overt diabetes is
`unusual except in individuals with pre-existing
`abnormal results of a glucose tolerancetest.
`Corticosteroid-induced diabetesis usually mild
`and can be managed along conventional lines
`bydietary measures, the administrationoforal
`hypoglycaemic agents and the judicious use of
`insulin, if necessary. It is frequently reversible
`on cessation of corticosteroid therapy, although
`the reversalofthe diabetic state maytake several
`months.!8
`Aseptic necrosis of the femoral head
`Theuse ofcorticosteroid agents is one of many
`factors which maypredispose patients to the
`developmentof aseptic necrosis of the femoral
`head. Among the numerous theories that are
`advancedas a basis for this unusual complica-
`tion of corticosteroid therapy,
`the currently
`favoured explanation is that fat microemboli
`occlude subchrondral end-arterioles and lead to
`bone-cell death!® The typical
`radiological
`appearanceis that of a lucent area betweenthe
`
`i490
`
`collapsed bone and the overlying cartilage.
`During a 10-year period, six patients (who
`represented approximately 1% ofall patients in
`one study who were receiving corticosteroid
`drugs for pulmonary diseases) developedaseptic
`necrosis of the femoral head.!9 A typical patient
`had been receiving greater than physiological
`dosesof corticosteroid drugs for more than three
`months, and more often for years. Recipients
`of renal transplants have an increased incidence
`of aseptic necrosis of bone, presumably as a
`long-term sequela of corticosteroid treatment,
`In a recent Australian survey, six of 52 renal
`transplantrecipients who survived for more than
`10 years developed aseptic necrosis of bone
`which involved otherjoints in addition to the
`hip2° A reviewofthe literature suggests that
`high doses ofcorticosteroid agents in the first
`month after transplantation were associated with
`an increased prevalence of aseptic necrosis.2°
`Patients with other disorders such as hyperuri-
`caemia, alcoholism, hyperlipidaemia or poly-
`cythaemia, who alsotake corticosteroid drugs,
`may be at greater risk of developing aseptic
`necrosis than those without these disorders.1?
`Peptic ulceration
`Support for the theorythat corticosteroid drugs
`lead to the developmentofpeptic ulceration has
`waxed and waned overthe years. The widely
`accepted clinical notion that
`there was an
`association was dispelled in 1976 by Conn and
`Blitzer, when they reviewed 42 randomized con-
`trolled trials and foundthat there was no sig-
`nificant
`relationship between corticosteroid
`therapy and peptic ulceration unless the drug
`was taken for more than 30 days or in large
`doses! The burning question has been
`rekindled recently by Messer et al., who
`reviewed 71 controlled trials in which patients
`were randomized to receive corticosteroid
`therapyor non-steroidal therapyforat least four
`days.?? The incidence ofpeptic ulcers was 1.8%
`in the corticosteroid-treated group compared
`with 0.8% in control patients2? Thus, current
`evidence suggests a small but significant associa-
`tion between corticosteroid therapy and peptic
`ulceration. However,
`in view of
`this
`low
`incidenceit is illogicalto institute prophylactic
`therapy — with antacids or with histamine
`H,-receptor antagonists — in all patients who
`are receiving corticosteroid drugs. If a patient
`is sufficiently unlucky as to develop an ulcer
`during corticosteroid treatment, he or she should
`be managed with conventional therapy. In the
`absence of convincing evidence that “steroid
`ulcers” are resistant to therapy,
`there are no
`compelling reasons to discontinue corticosteroid
`treatment unlesslife-threatening complications
`of the ulcer have supervened.
`Symptomsof gastrointestinal intolerance such
`as dyspepsia and nausea may occur,
`in which
`case antacid therapy is useful. It is important
`to choose agents such as aluminiumhydroxide,
`magnesiumtrisilicate and magnesium hydroxide
`whichdonotappearto affect the absorption of
`prednisolone.23
`Pancreatitis
`Acute pancreatitis is a rare but serious compli-
`
`

`

`Therapeutics|14
`THE MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA Vol. 144. February 3, 1986
`
`
`
`
`the onset of
`cation of corticosteroid therapy,
`whichis not related to the dose, duration or type
`of corticosteroid drug that is used. In a review
`of 112 patients with drug-induced pancreatitis.
`corticosteroid agents were the most common
`offenders, being implicated in 51 cases2*
`Myopathy
`Corticosteroid myopathy presents as weakness
`and wasting in the proximal
`limb and girdle
`musculature. Although the dosage of cortico-
`steroid agent has frequently been high and
`sustained over many months,
`there does not
`appearto be goodcorrelation betweenthe total
`dose, the duration oftreatment, the paticnt’s age
`or sex andthe severity of the myopathy. Since
`the incidence is higher with the fluorinatedcorti-
`costeroid drugs such as triamcinolone?> such
`agents should not be used in the long term.
`Patients usually recover within a few weeks of
`the cessation of the corticosteroid therapy.
`Oculareffects
`Although an increase in intraocular pressureis
`more commonwith the topical administration
`of corticosteroid preparations, it can also occur
`with systemic corticosteroid agents but onlyafter
`months oryears of treatment.2° The risk, which
`appearsto be genetically determined, is greatest
`in individuals with myopia or diabetes. The
`proposed mechanisminvolves increased produc-
`tion of aqueous humour and swelling of the
`collagen in the trabecular meshwork in the
`drainage angle of the anterior chamber, leading
`to an increased resistance to aqueous outflow2®
`Increases in intraocular pressure are usually
`reversible if corticosteroid therapy is ceased.
`Posterior subcapsular cataracts have been
`documentedin patients who are receiving long-
`termcorticosteroid therapy. The usual minimum
`time required for the onset of cataracts is one
`year of
`treatment with at
`least
`10 mg of
`prednisone a day.2° There is some evidence to
`suggest that this complication is more common
`in children and in patients with rheumatoid
`arthritis. In viewof these ocular complications,
`it is prudentforall patients who are being treated
`with long-term corticosteroid therapy to undergo
`regular ophthalmological examinations.
`Raised intracranial pressure
`A small proportion of patients, usually children
`or young women, develop papilloedema and
`signs of raised intracranial pressure when their
`corticosteroid dosage is being reduced. This
`syndromehas been designatedeither as “benign
`intracranial hypertension” or as “‘pseudotumour
`cerebri”. The usual treatmentis to increase the
`corticosteroid dose temporarily to relieve the
`symptoms and then to attempt a more gradual
`withdrawal 27
`Infections
`Corticosteroid drugs impair cell-mediated im-
`munity by decreasing the numberofcirculating
`lymphocytes and monocytes, by blocking the
`sensitization of lymphocytes to antigen and by
`inhibiting the responsiveness of monocytes to
`the chemotactic factors that are elaborated by
`lymphocytes.28 Antibody formation and turnover
`are not affected significantly by corticosteroid
`drugs.
`In spite of the recognized effects of
`
`corticosteroid agents and experimental studies
`that have demonstrated an increased risk of
`infection with
`numerous
`agents
`in
`corticosteroid-treated animals, it has been more
`difficult to document the degree of increased
`susceptibility in clinical studies? Nevertheless,
`it is generally agreedthat patients whoarc taking
`long-termcorticosteroid drugs are predisposed
`to bacterial
`(mycobacteria,
`staphylococcus,
`listeria). viral (herpes, cytomegalovirus), fungal
`(candida,
`cryptococcus)
`and parasitic
`(toxoplasma, pneumocystis) infections.?® In the
`case oftuberculosis, preventive measures should
`be taken.
`In patients with positive results of
`Mantoux skin tests to intermediate strength
`tuberculin (5 TU), but normal chest radiograph
`films. modest doses of corticosteroid agents
`(10-15 mg of prednisolone a day) do not appear
`to carry an increased risk of tuberculosis.?°
`Therefore, such individuals do not benefit from
`prophylactic therapy with isoniazid. However,
`if patients have radiological features that are
`consistent with inactive pulmonarytuberculosis,
`they warrant treatment with two drugs suchas
`isoniazid and ethambutol or rifampicin° The
`physician should bealert to the possibility of
`both commonand unusual infections in patients
`who are receiving corticosteroid agents, par-
`ticularly if these are combined with other
`immunosuppressant drugs.
`Adrenal suppression
`In treating inflammatorydiseases with cortico-
`steroid agents, it is common to begin with high
`doses to obtain some measure ofcontrol. There-
`fore, the dose is reduced, according to indices
`of disease activity, until a satisfactory mainten-
`ance dose is reached. Ultimately it may be
`possible to cease the administration of cortico-
`steroid therapy altogether, in which case certain
`guidelines should be observed. It is generally
`accepted that derangement ofadrenal function
`occurs after a few days of high-dose cortico-
`steroid therapy. In contrast to the rapid recovery
`after treatment that is limited to two to three
`weeks,
`long-term daily therapy with cortico-
`steroid drugs may suppress hypothalamic—
`pituitary—adrenal function for up to nine months
`after the cessation of treatment.3! Therefore, it
`is important to keep the daily maintenance dose
`as
`low as possible or
`to use alternate-day
`therapy2? because both of these strategies —
`particularly the latter — minimize the chances
`of blunting the
`stress
`response of
`the
`hypothalamic-pituitary—adrenal axis.
`Since the recoveryof the adrenal cortex lags
`behind that ofthe pituitary, one can usually as-
`sume that full integrity has been restored when
`the adrenal gland can mount an adequate
`secretory response of cortisol
`to synthetic
`ACTH:3' Therefore, the following approach for
`the withdrawal ofcorticosteroid therapy is sug-
`gested3! First, wean the patient to “‘physio-
`logical’ doses of a corticosteroid agent (such
`as 20 mg of hydrocortisone or 5 mg of pred-
`nisone) to be taken for one to two months; then
`halve the dose for the next one to two months;
`and then determine the morning plasmacortisol
`concentration, omitting the morning dose of
`
`corticosteroid agent on the day of plasma
`sampling. A morning cortisol concentration of
`greater than 0.28 mol/L (10 pg/l00mL) indi-
`cates that basal hypothalamic—pituitary—adrenal
`function has recovered. Adrenal reserve is then
`assessed by a tetracosactrin (ACTH) stimulation
`test. If the morning plasmacortisol level is less
`than 0.28 pmol/L CO ug/l00 mL),
`then
`corticosteroid treatment should be continued for
`another one to two months before another
`morning plasma sample is collected.
`In most circumstances, a justifiable alternative
`to these diagnostic tests of adrenal functionis
`to administer
`supplemental corticosteroid
`therapy during physiological stress (such as
`accidents, surgical procedures, febrile illnesses,
`repeated vomiting or dehydration) for a year
`after the medication is discontinued. Depending
`upon the clinical urgency, therapy can be given
`parenterally or by mouth in a daily dose that
`is equivalent to 200-400 mg of hydrocortisone.*!
`A syndromecalled “steroid pseudorheuma-
`tism’, which is distinct from simple adrenal
`insufficiency, has been recognized in patients
`whotake their corticosteroid therapyerratically
`or whose dosage is
`reduced abruptly.
`It
`is
`characterized by fever,
`anorexia, malaise,
`myalgia andarthralgia.' These symptoms resolve
`after increasing the dose of corticosteroid agent:
`a more gradual reduction of corticosteroid drugs
`prevents their recurrence.
`
`I
`
`References
`systemic
`1. Melby JC. Clinical pharmacology of
`corticosteroids. Arm Rev PharmacolToxicol 1977, SM-527.
`2. Dujorne CA. Azarnoff DL. Clinical complications of
`corticosteroid therapy. Med Clin North Am 1973: 57:
`1331-1342.
`3. Chan CS, Brown IG, Oliver WA, Zimmerman PV.
`Hydrocortisone-induced anaphylaxis. Med J Aust 1984;
`141: 444-446.
`4. Streck F, Lockwood Dean H. Pituitary adrenal recovery
`following short-term suppression with corticosteroids.
`Am J Med 1979; 66: 910-914.
`5. Webb J. Clark TJH. Recoveryof plasma corticotrophin
`and cortisol
`levels
`after
`a
`three-week course of
`prednisolone. Thorax 1981; 36: 22-24.
`6. Myles AB, Bacon PA, Daly JR. Single daily dose
`corticosteroid treatment: effect on adrenal function and
`therapeutic efficacy in various diseases. Ann Rheum Dis
`1971; 30: 149-153.
`. Cochrane GM. Systemic steroids in asthma. In: Clark
`TJH, ed. Steroids in asthma. Balgowlah: Adis Press,
`1983; 103-120.
`systemic
`8. Thomas TPL. The complications of
`corticosteroid therapyin the elderly. Gerontology1984:
`30: 60-65.
`clinical
`9. Swartz SL, Dluhy RG. Corticosteroids:
`pharmacology and therapeutic use. Curr Therapeutics
`1978; 19 (9): 145-170.
`10. Jackson SHD, Beevers DG, Myers K. Does long-term
`low-dose corticosteroid therapy cause hypertension? Clin
`Sci 1981; 61 (suppl 7): 381s-383s.
`11. Lewis GP, Jusko WJ. Burke CW, Graves L. Prednisone
`side-effects and serum-protein levels. Lancer 1971, 2:
`778-781.
`12. David DS, Greico MH, CushmanP. Adrenal glucocorti-
`coids after 20 years: a reviewoftheir clinically relevant
`consequences. J Chronic Dis 1970, 22: 637-711.
`13. Baylink DJ. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. N Engl
`J Med 1983; 309: 306-308.
`14. Gluck OS, Murphy WA, HahnTJ,et al. Bone loss in
`adults receiving alternate day glucocorticoid therapy: a
`comparison with daily therapy. Arthritis Rhewm1981, 24:
`892-898.
`15. Shubin H. Long-term(five or more years) administration
`ofcorticosteroids in pulmonarydiseases. Dis Chest 1965,
`48: 287-290.
`16. Hartog M, Gaafar MA, Fraser R. Effect of cortico-
`
`

`

`142
`
`[Therapeutics
` February 3, 1986 Vol. 144 THE MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
`
`N iy
`
`wo
`
`Books received
`(Continued from page 135)
`
`Editorial]. Lancet 1964; 2: 1052-1053.
`steroids on serum growth hormone. Lancet 1964; 2:
`costeroid therapy and peptic ulcer. V Engl J Med 1976;
`376-378.
`294: 472-479,
`28. Dale DC, Petersdorf RG. Corticosteroids and infectiou:
`. Messer J, Reitman D, Sacks HS, et al. Association of
`diseases. Med Clin North Am 1973; 57: 1277-1287,
`17. Olefsky JM, Kimmerling G. Effects of glucocorticoids
`on carbohydrate metabolism. Am J Med Sci 1976: 271:
`adrenocorticosteroid therapy and peptic-ulcer disease. N
`29. Schatz M, Patterson R, Kloner R, Falk J. The prevalence
`202-210.
`Engl J Med 1983; 309: 21-24.
`of tuberculosis and positive tuberculin skin tests in ;
`18. Miller SE, Neilson JM. Clinical features of the diabetic
`steroid-treated asthmatic population. Ann Intern Med
`23. Tanner AR, Caffin JA, Halliday JW. et al. Concurrent
`1976; 84: 261-265.
`syndrome appearing after steroid therapy. Postgrad Med
`administration of antacids and prednisone: effect on
`J 1964; 40: 660-664.
`of
`30. Treatment of Tuberculosis. Recommendations
`serumlevels of prednisolone. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1979;
`7: 397-400.
`19. Richards M, Santiago M, Klaustermeyer B. Aseptic
`National Tuberculosis Advisory Council. Canberra:
`necrosis of the femoral head in corticosteroid-treated
`Commonwealth Department of Health, 1982.
`24. Nakashima Y, Howard JM. Drug-induced acute pancrea-
`ttis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977; 145: 105-109.
`pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med
`1980:
`140:
`. Chamberlin P, Meyer WJ. Management of pituitary-
`1473-1475.
`25. Golding DN, Begg TB. Dexamethasone myopathy. Br
`adrenal suppression secondary to corticosteroid therapy
`Pediatrics 1981; 67: 245-251.
`Med J 1960; 2: 1129-1130.
`20. Mahony JF, Sheil AGR, Etheredge SB, et al. Delayed
`complications of
`renal
`transplantation and their
`26. David DS, Berkowitz JS. Ocular effects of topical and
`32. Fauci AS. Alternate-daycorticosteroid therapy. 4m J Med
`1978, 64: 729-731.
`prevention. Med J Aust 1982; 2: 426-429,
`systemic corticosteroids. Lancet 1969; 2: 149-151.
`21. Conn HO,Blitzer BL. Nonassociation of adrenocorti-
`27. Anonymous.
`Intracranial hypertension and_
`steroids
`(Received May9; accepted July II, 1985)
`
`Haemophiliac bleeding: early management at home. A.
`A physician’s guide to computers and computing. John M.
`Allswang, Jon I. Isenberg, Michacl H. Weiss. Norwalk:
`Aronstam. London: Bailliére Tindall; Sydney: Methuen 1985
`Appleton-Century-Crofts; Sydney: Prentice-Hall 1985 (xxv
`(xi + 112 pp., $7.50).
`Handbook ofneonatal intensive care. 2nd edn. HenryL.
`+ 208 pp., $64.50).
`Halliday, Garth McClure, Mark Reid. London: Bailliére
`Principles of family systems in family medicine. Sergio
`Henao, Nellie P. Grose, eds. New York: Brunner/Mazel;
`(Handbook of
`Epidemiology of hypertension.
`Tindall; Sydney: Methuen 1985 (viii + 333 pp., $22.50).
`Hypertension, Vol 6.) D.J. Bulpitt, ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
`Sydney: Butterworths 1985 (xiv + 423 pp., $80).
`The hands of the living G

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket