throbber
r~UTTERWQRTH Long-term treatment of mineralocorticoid excess syndromes F. Mantero, G. Opocher, S. Rocco, G. Carpen~, and D. Armanini Divisions of Endocrinology, Universities of Padua and Ancona, Italy Recognition of the pathogenesis of secondary forms of hypertension is often considered the key to appropriate choice of treatment. We here present the results of a prolonged clinical follow-up (from I to 20 years) of a large number of patients with mineralocorticoid excess syndromes (MES), including over 100 patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), 3 cases with dexamethasone-suppressible aldosteronism (DSA), 3 cases of apparent min- eralocorticoid excess (AME ) Type H, and 4 patients with 17-hydroxylase deficiency (170HDS ). The patients with PA have been divided in two subgroups, one of 69 cases followed between 1973 and 1982, and the second of 37 patients studied between 1983 and 1992; 33 further cases were not evaluated due to poor compliance. In group I, 26 patients underwent surgery (23 unilateral adenoma, 1 primary hyperplasia, 2 bilateral nodular hyperpla- sia); at 5 years 50% had normal blood pressure, 25% had mild hypertension and 25% had moderate to severe hypertension. Forty-three patients with either adenoma (APA ) or idiopathic aldosteronism (IHA) received long- term spironolactone treatment. Among them, 13 required the addition of thiazide and~or f3-blockers, while 13 were switched to an amiloride/thiazide combination (+- beta blockers) due to side-effects to spironolactone (gynecomastia 6/20 males, menstrual upset or breast pain in 7/23 females). In group H, 12 patients underwent surgery (11 adenoma, 1 primary hyperplasia) with a similar outcome at 3 years as in group I; 25 patients were put on either K canrenoate (11) or Ca ÷ ÷ channel blockers (14) with or without KCl supplementation; in 8 cases these two drugs were combined according to blood pressure levels achieved during the follow-up. ACE inhib- itors, thiazide, ketanserin, and ketoconazole were given in selected cases. Gynecomastia occurred only in 2 out of 16 males while on K canrenoate and no side effects were reported in females on the same regimen. The other patients with ACTH-dependent MES were all treated initially with dexamethasone (DEX) at low doses (0.25-1 mg q.d). In all cases potassium remained within the normal limits; blood pressure was not adequately controlled in all 3 cases of DSH and in the oldest patient with 170HDS and AME Type 1I, respectively, in spite of the normalization of the hormonal patterns. Ca ÷ + antagonists have been added in these cases, and K canrenoate substituted for DEX in the AME Type H patient. In conclusion, surgical removal or long term treatment of ME with specific antagonists or inhibitors may be inadequate to normalize high blood pressure in almost a half of the patients with MES. This could be due, inter alia, to the persistence of vascular abnormalities, to the coexistence of essential hypertension, or to our only partial understanding of the pathophysiology of some of these syndromes (e.g., IHA and AME). (Steroids 60:81-86, 1995) Keywords: primary aldosteronism; mineralocorticoid excess syndromes; spironolactone; K canrenoate; Ca antagonists Introduction The principal steroids with mineralocorticoid (MC) activity secreted by the adrenal cortex are aldosterone, from the zona glomerulosa, and deoxycorticosterone (DOC) and cor- tisol, which are zona fasciculata hormones. Aldosterone is the most potent MC, followed by DOC, while cortisol has Address reprint requests to Professor F Mantero, Division of Endocrinol- ogy, University of Ancona, Italy. only 1/400 the MC activity of aldosterone. These steroids produce hypertension by several mechanisms; in longstand- ing MC hypertension peripheral vascular resistance is in- creased, but the initiating effects are most likely early plasma volume and extracellular fluid expansion1; a direct action of MC on central nervous system and an increased sensitivity to catecholamines may also play a role in the pathogenesis of MC hypertension, z The mechanisms by which cortisol induces hypertension are probably more re- lated to its glucocorticoid activity, 3 with the exception of the syndrome of apparent MC excess. 4 Steroids 60:81--86, 1995 © Elsevier Science Inc., 1995 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 0039-128X/95/$10.00 SSDI 0039-128X(94)00018-8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2066
`Mylan v. Janssen IPR2016-01332
`
`

`

`Papers Insight into early mechanisms of MC hypertension has come from studies following discontinuation of the aldoste- rone-receptor antagonist spironolactone (Sp) in patients with an aldosterone-producing tumor. An increase of so- dium retention with a weight gain of approximately 1-2 kg is followed by sodium escape, renal potassium wasting, and increase of blood pressure. 5 Spironolactone is in fact the most specific treatment of MC excess syndrome, and par- ticularly of primary aldosteronism. 6-s However, it is a com- mon observation that the pharmacological management of these secondary forms of hypertension is not as simple and predictable as one would expect from the above consider- ations.9-11 In this paper we wish to review the results of a prolonged clinical follow up (from 1 to 20 years) of a large group of patients with mineralocorticoid-excess syndrome (MES), including over 100 patients with primary aldosteronism, 3 patients with dexamethasone-suppressible hyperaldosteron- ism, 4 patients with 17-hydroxylase deficiency, and 3 pa- tients with the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid ex- cess Type II. Experimental One hundred six patients with primary aldosteronism were in- cluded in this study, with the diagnosis based on the usual criteria (hypertension with hypokalemia in most cases, suppressed plasma renin activity (PRA), high urinary aldosterone). ~2 The differential diagnosis between aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) and id- iopathic aldosteronism (IHA) was made on the basis of the results of plasma aldosterone response to upright posture and angiotensin II infusion, and on adrenal computerized tomography and scinti- scan; in several cases adrenal vein catheterization was also per- formed for aldosterone measurement in the effluent. All patients were studied in the Institute of Semeiotica Medica of the Univer- sity of Padua Medical School, while on a diet containing 120-150 mEq of Na + and 60-80 mEq of K + . The patients with APA underwent surgery in the Department of Surgery, University of Padua Medical School; both groups of patients (APA post-surgery and IHA) were then followed as outpatients in the Clinic of the Institute of Semeiotica Medica for a period ranging from a mini- mum of 1 year to a maximum of 20 years, by the same group of investigators. The patients were further divided in two subgroups, one of 69 cases followed between 1973 and 1982, and the second one in- cluding 37 patients studied between 1983 and 1992. Thirty-three additional cases were not further evaluated due to poor compli- ance. In the first subgroup (n = 69), 26 patients underwent surgery. In 23 a unilateral adenoma was found; 1 had unilateral hyperpla- sia, and 2 had a bilateral adrenalectomy for nodular hyperplasia. Forty-three patients with adenoma or idiopathic aldosteronism re- ceived long-term medical treatment (spironolactone alone or asso- ciated with thiazide and/or 3-blockers, or substituted by an amiloride/thiazide combination due to side-effects). The duration of follow-up of these patients ranged from 1 to 20 years. Among the second subgroup (n = 37), 12 patients underwent unilateral adrenalectomy (11 cases of adenoma and 1 of primary hyperplasia); 25 patients were classified as idiopathic aldosteron- ism and treated with the aldosterone antagonist K + canrenoate and/or Ca + +-channel blockers plus potassium supplements. ACE-inhibitors, ketanserin and ketoconazole, were given in se- lected cases. The duration of follow-up in these patients ranged from 1 to 10 years. Glucocorticoid-remediable hyperaldosteronism (n = 3) Three patients (brothers aged 35, 23, and 19) with glucocorticoid- remediable hyperaldosteronism were included in this study. The diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical criteria: hypertension, mild hypokalemia, suppressed PRA, and slightly elevated plasma and urinary aldosterone levels, exacerbation by ACTH stimulation and prompt and persistent suppression by dexamethasone admin- istration. The patients were treated initially with dexamethasone alone and subsequently with a combination of different antihyper- tensive drugs. 13 17et-hydroxylase deficiency (n = 4) Four patients with 17a-hydroxylase deficiency were studied. Two were genetically female, and two were male pseudohermaphro- dites. The diagnosis was made on the basis of the primary amen- orrhea, lack of secondary female traits, hypertension, hypokale- mia, high DOC and corticosterone (B) levels, low F, and suppressed PRA and aldosterone levels. The patients were all treated with dexamethasone, with other antihypertensive drugs subsequently added in one patient. 14 Apparent mineralocorticoid excess syndrome (n = 3) Three patients with the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess (AME) Type I1 were studied for more than 10 years. Two patients were brother and sister; the third had no other relatives affected. Diagnosis was made on the basis of the presence of hypertension, hypokalemia, suppressed PRA and aldosterone, normal MCH, low excretion of alloTHF, THF, and THE, with a normal THF + alloTHFITHE ratio, but decreased cortisol turn- over quotient. All 3 patients were initially treated with dexameth- asone, but subsequently one of them was switched to other anti- hypertensive drugs. ~s Results Primao' aldosteronism: subgroup 1 (n = 69) Surgical treatment. Among the 26 patients who underwent surgery, a unilateral adrenal adenoma was found in 23. In these patients, after a mean period of follow-up of 5.5 years the mean blood pressure decreased from 198 ___ 16/123 -+- 9 mm Hg to 142 +- 15/96 +_ 9 mm Hg. Normalization of both systolic and diastolic blood pres- sure was reached in 13 patients; in 6 only a partial decrease of blood pressure was obtained, and in 4 patients the hy- pertension remained unchanged. In all patients normal se- rum potassium levels were found during follow-up. In one patient unilateral hyperplasia was found; serum K + and blood pressure were normal up to 7 years after operation. In 2 patients with IHA who underwent bilateral adrenalectomy moderate hypertension persisted, and antihypertensive treatment had to be added to the conventional replacement therapy. Medical treatment. Spironolactone: Forty-three patients with primary aldosteronism (most of them with IHA, and 2 with APA who refused operation) were treated initially with spironolactone, in general at a starting dose of 300 mg/day (mean dose 313 --- 85 mg), which was progressively de- creased after the first month to a maintenance dose of 100 82 Steroids, 1995, vol. 60, January
`
`

`

`Long-term treatment of mineralocorticoid excess: Mantero et aL mg/day (mean 90 --- 23). Mean baseline levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 193 ± 26/119 ± 11 mm Hg. After 1 month, the mean blood pressure was 147 ± 17/97 ± 12 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure was normal in 58% of the patients. After 5 years only 14 of 29 remained on spironolactone alone. Mean blood pressure was 142 ± 10/94 ± 9 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure was normal in 46% of the cases. Spironolactone and Thiazide (Chlorthalidone): In 7 pa- tients who were partially resistant to spironolactone a com- bination of spironolactone (100 mg/day) and chlorthalidone (50-100 mg/day) was given. Blood pressure decreased from 157 -+ 17/107 - 13 to 134 --- 17/93 --- 8 mm Hg within the first month and remained at similar levels on the following 2 years. Serum K + was lower than that reached with Sp alone, but still within the normal range. Spironolactone and 3-blockers: In 6 patients, proprano- lol (120 mg/day) was added to spironolactone after 3 months of therapy; mean blood pressure decreased from 162 - 12/98 ± 7 to 150 ± 10/93 --+ 6 mm Hg and remained at the same levels for the following 12 months. Amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide ( + timolol or ateno- 1ol): In 13 patients (6 males and 7 females) Sp had to be withdrawn due to the appearance of side effects (gyneco- mastia and menstrual disorders). Since amiloride is avail- able in Italy only as a fixed combination (5 mg + 50 mg of hydrochlorothiazide), 3-blockers (atenolol 100 mg or timo- lol 10 mg/day) were routinely added. After 3 months of therapy, mean blood pressure was 133 -+ 12/88 ± 6 mm Hg, and serum K + was normal. Primary aldosteronism: subgroup 2 (n = 37) Surgical treatment (Table 1). Unilateral adrenalectomy was performed in 12 patients. In 11, a unilateral adenoma was found, while in 1 patient a diagnosis of unilateral adre- nal hyperplasia was made. The short and long term results of blood pressure control and serum K ÷ as well as hormone data are presented in Table 1. Mean blood pressure de- creased significantly over the first 3 months from 180 -+ 5/112 --- 4 to 138 + 3/88 ± 2 mm Hg. Potassium increased from 2.9 ± 0.1 to 4.5 ± 0.1 mEq/L. PRA increased to normal levels, while aldosterone decreased to low-normal levels. After a mean follow up of 2 years, mean blood pressure was 132 ± 5/91 ± 2 and potassium was 4.6 mEq/ L. At an individual level, 8 patients with APA and 1 with PAH had normal BP, while in 3 patients mild to moderate hypertension persisted. Table 1 Primary aldosteronism: subgroup 11--37 patients; Type of treatment: surgery (n = 12) Baseline Short term Long term Systolic (mm Hg) 180 ± 5 138 --- 3 a 132 -+ 5 a Diastolic (mm Hg) 112 -+ 4 88 ± 2 a 91 ± 2.6 a Ks (mEq/L) 2.9 ± 0.1 4.5 -+ 0.1 a 4.6 ± 0.1 ° PRA (mg/mLJ3 h) 0.3 ± 0.1 4.6 -+ 2.7 -- P Aldosterone (mg/dL) 52.3 ± 5.5 7.8 ± 1.7 a -- U Aldosterone (p.g/d) 40.9 ± 7.2 8.5 ± 4.2 a -- ap < 0.05. Medical treatment (Table 2). Twenty-five patients who had been classified as having idiopathic hyperaldosteronism were put on either the aldosterone antagonist K + can- renoate (n = 11) or on Ca + +-channel blockers (in most cases nifedipine; occasionally lacedipine, nitrendipine, or amlodipine) (n = 14) and potassium supplementation when baseline serum K + was frankly subnormal (Table 2). At a starting dose of 200 mg, which was then decreased to 100 mg/after 1-3 months, K + cartrenoate induced a fall in BP from 178 - 6/110 -+ 4 to 159 ± 4/102 ± 3 mm Hg in 3 months and to 156 ± 8/97 ± 3 mm Hg after 1 or more years (n = 5). In 4 patients nifedipine was added to K + can- renoate to achieve better control of blood pressure, while in 2 cases K + canrenoate was discontinued due to the appear- ance of gynecomastia. In the 14 patients on Ca ++ antago- nists (nifedipine 40 rag/day, or comparable doses of other compounds of the same family), the levels of baseline blood pressure and the changes obtained after short- and long-term treatment were superimposable on those obtained with K + canrenoate (Table 2). Potassium was normalized in these patients when K + supplements were added, and in 2 pa- tients while only on Ca ++ -antagonist, and remained nor- mal in those patients in whom it was already so from the beginning. As expected, PRA was increased by K + canrenoate and not by Ca + + antagonists. Plasma and urinary aldosterone remained unchanged during aldosterone-antagonist admin- istration and were significantly decreased in those patients on chronic Ca + ÷ channel blockers. Glucocorticoid-suppressible hyperaldosteronism The 3 patients with DEX suppressible hyperaldosteronism were initially treated for a month with DEX. In two blood pressure was reduced to normal by this treatment, while in the third no major effect on blood pressure was obtained. He was then treated with K + canrenoate and methyl-dopa with satisfactory results. The other two patients remained on DEX at 0.5 mg/day which maintained K ÷ levels within the normal limits, but their blood pressure rose progres- sively while on treatment. They were finally switched to a combination of Ca + +-channel blockers and K + can- renoate; their blood pressure was stable around 140/90 mm Hg for years. The third patient, in spite of an apparent good control of blood pressure, died suddenly of a stroke at the age of 26 y. 17et-hydroxylase deficiency (Figure 1) We were able to follow 4 patients with this disease for several years. In the short term, DEX (1 mg/day) reduced blood pressure to normal values in 3 of the patients, and partially in one, who was the oldest at the time of the diagnosis (26 y). The same was true during long-term fol- low up (over 10 y); daily doses of DEX between 0.25 and 0.5 mg were able to suppress DOC plasma values, although incompletely, and normalize serum K +. PRA and aldoste- rone were maintained within the normal levels, after an initial period of several months of persisting suppressed values, especially for aldosterone. In the fourth case, thia- zide, 13-blockers, Ca + +-channel blockers and ACE inhib- Steroids, 1995, vol. 60, January 83
`
`

`

`Papers Table 2 Primary aldosteronism: subgroup 2--37 patients. Type of treatment: medical (n = 25) Baseline Short-term Long-term K" canren Ca' + antag K + canren Ca ++ antag K + canren Ca + + antag n = 11 n = 14 n = 11 n = 14 n = 5 n = 6 Systolic (ram Hg) 178 -+ 6 169 +- 4 159 _+ 4" Diastolic (mm Hg) 110 _+ 1 108 _+ 2 102 + 3 a Ks (mEq/L) 3.3 -+ 0.2 3.4 +- 0.1 3.9 -+ 0,2 ~ PRA (mg/rnL/3 h) 0.31 ~ 1.6 0.58 +_ 0,2 1.06 +_ 0,56 P Aldosterone (mg/dL) 34 ± 7.1 45 +_ 5,2 37 +- 5.9 U Aldosterone (l~g/d) 25 -~ 3.3 37 +_ 4,8 23 +- 3.9 161 _+ 5 a 156+_8 157_+ 2 103+-4 a 97 +3 a 96-+3 4.0 +_ 0.1 a 4.0 _+ 0.2 a 4.3 -+ 0.1 0.86 -+ 0.24 -- -- 33 -+ 5.6 -- -- 26 +_ 5.8 -- -- ap < 0.05. M.D. 23 yrs.~) Thia~de Thi~ide Thiaz~ie 230- ~ A.D. 19 yrs. ~ Ca an ~g onis~ +CaB Blockersantag°nist +CaB Block e~antag°nist ~1':!~11210t. " G'D" 14 yrs" ~'~ i i i ACEI 0 2 4 6 8 years Figure 1 Long-term follow-up of 3 siblings with 17~- hydroxylase deficiency. itors had to be added at different times to control the severe hypertension. Left ventricular hypertrophy and 11 degree retinopathy were present from the beginning in this patient, Apparent mineralocorticoid excess-Type H (Figure 2) The 3 patients with AME type I1 were all treated with DEX at a starting dose of 2 rag/day for a month, and subsequently with 0.5 or 0.25 rag/day. The 2 male patients from Sardinia were adequately controlled for several years in terms of blood pressure and K +; at the same time their growth rate increased markedly and pubertal maturation occurred. The third patient was not controlled by 0.5 mg of DEX, and mild Cushingoid features appeared. She was switched to a combination of K + canrenoate with atenolol or nifedipine, and subsequently lisinopril was also employed, with good results. No signs of target organ impairment were detected in these patients during the follow-up (Figure 2). Discussion The possibility of correcting high blood pressure levels by specific pharmacological or surgical intervention is one of the most obvious reasons for attempting to recognize the secondary forms of hypertension. This is especially true for the endocrine causes of hypertension, since surgical re- moval of hormone producing tumors appears a curative ma- neuver, for example in primary aldosteronism due to uni- lateral adenoma. Although the mechanism by which aldosterone induces hypertension is still incompletely known, removal of the adenoma is usually followed by a rapid amelioration of the hypertension. However, both in the literature and in our own experience, long-term cure rates are far from satisfactory.='9" 1.=6-~9 In fact, in the pa- tients presented in this paper, only little over half of the cases who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for the pres- ence of an adenoma had a complete cure of hypertension, although hypokalemia resolved in all, as well as the abnor- malities of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. A quarter of the patients had a partial remission, with reduc- tion of their blood pressure levels to mild elevation, while in the rest hypertension remained unchanged. We have not yet performed a careful analysis of the possible correlations between cure or persistence of hypertension and parameters such as family history, age, degree of pre-operative hyper- tension, levels of aldosterone, size of the tumor, or presence of signs of target organ impairment. More expected were the clinical data obtained after long- term medical treatment in a large group of patients with idiopathic aldosteronism. As clearly appears from the anal- ysis of blood pressure response to spironolactone in the first subgroup, at least 30% of the patients were not controlled by this drug alone, and additional antihypertensives (thia- zide and/or 13-blockers) had to be given for adequate reduc- tion of blood pressure. Furthermore, another 30% of pa- tients were changed to a different potassium-sparing drug, amiloride, due to the occurrence of side effects of spirono- lactone. In the last decade (second subgroup of patients) the availability of a slightly different aldosterone antagonist (K + canrenoate) 2° and the increasing evidence of the ther- apeutic properties of Ca + +-channel blockers in primary aldosteronism 2~-23 have changed attitudes toward the treat- ment of primary aldosteronism. Potassium canrenoate is a water soluble derivative of spironolactone, sharing the same active metabolite canrenone, but has probably a different pattern of metabolism which avoids the formation of inter- mediate products with anti-androgenic effects. 24 A result is the decreased incidence of side effects as shown by several trials in essential hypertensive 25'z6 and cirrhotic patients. Only two of the 16 male patients on long term K + can- renoate either alone or in combination reported gynecomas- tia, and no menstrual disturbances occurred in women. 84 Steroids, 1995, vol. 60, January
`
`

`

`Figure 2 210" 190" 170" 150" E E 130" 110" 90" 70' 50" Long-term treatment of mineralocorticoid excess: Mantero et aL Baoel|ne Dex O. 5 / Atenolol Atenolol Lisinopril K Cllnronollte K Canrenoate K Canrenoate Nifedipine Cadralazine l I i II II II I // I I I I 1 month 1 2 3 5 1 0 years 5,00~ 4,00~ rn 3,00~=. 2,00 Long-term follow-up patient with AME Type 2. In terms of blood pressure, the results obtained both in short-term and in long-term treatment with K + canrenoate were not significantly different from those obtained in the previous group with spironolactone at corresponding doses. A Ca ++-antagonist had to be added in one third of the patients in order to improve the blood pressure control. In the same group, more than half were treated from the be- ginning with Ca + +-antagonists only. This approach was stimulated by the reports of Nadler et al. 21 and by our own preliminary experiences in an acute study 27 and a short-term trial 2s in two groups of patients with either APA or IHA, which demonstrated good antihypertensive effects of nifed- ipine in both conditions, and even a decrease of aldosterone levels in patients with IHA. The results obtained by more prolonged treatment in this study confirmed that nifedipine and antialdosterone compounds have a similar effect on the control of hypertension in IHA. In most patients normal or slightly subnormal K + levels were maintained or even normalized by Ca t+ -channel blockers. Potassium supplements were used from the be- ginning only in few patients with more severe degrees of hypokalemia. Patients on these drugs have less side effects than those on aldosterone antagonists, even if the latter can be used in selected cases at quite low doses which are un- likely to exert antiandrogenic effects. The antihypertensive efficacy of Ca + +-channel blockers may also rely on increased Ca t+ entry into VSMC as a consequence of activation of the Nat-Ca t+ pump; this is ascribed to an increase of Na + influx as a consequence of Na +-K + pump inhibition by the ouabain-like factor which is reported to be elevated in primary aldosteronism. On the other hand, spironolactone and canrenone have been re- cently shown to interfere with the slow Ca t +-channel ac- tivity. 29'30 In a limited number of cases, 13-blockers and ACE in- hibitors 3~ have been combined with potassium-sparing agents or even to thiazides to better control high blood pressure. Their effectiveness is not surprising in patients with IHA, since their characteristics are not much different from those of low renin essential hypertension. Further- more, the simultaneous use of diuretics, by inducing a cer- tain degree of sodium depletion, results in an increased sensitivity to the antihypertensive agents. Furthermore, we have previously demonstrated in a short-term study that ACE inhibitors themselves have a discrete hypotensive ef- fect in patients with IHA, together with a variable reduction of aldosterone levels. This may be due to interference with the enhanced sensitivity of adrenal cortex to angiotensin II in these patients, and even on a direct effect on adrenal renin, with circulating angiotensin II almost undetectable. References 1. Biglieri EG, Schambelan M, Slaton PE Jr, Stockigt JR (1970). The intercurrent hypertension of primary aldosteronism. Circ Res 20/ 21:(Suppl 1):I195-I202. 2. Gomez-Sanchez EP (1986). Intracerebroventricular infusion of al- dosterone induces hypertension in rats. Endocrinology 118:819-823. 3. Whitworth JA (1987). Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced hy- pertension. Kidney Int 31:1213-1224. 4. Shackleton CHL, Stewart PM (1980). The hypertension of apparent mineralocorticoid excess (AME) syndrome. In: Biglieri EG and Melby JC (eds), Endocrine Hypertension. Raven Press, New York, pp. 155-173. 5. Wenting GJ, Man in't Veld AJ, Verhoeven RP, Schalekamp MAD (1977). Volume-pressure relationships during development of min- eralocorticoid hypertension in man. Circ Res 40(Suppl 1): 163-170. 6. Biglieri EG (1982). Syndrome of primary aldosteronism and hy- pertension. In: Mantero F, Biglieri EF, Edwards CRW (eds), En- docrinology of Hypertension, Vol. 50. New York, Academic Press, pp. 69-83. 7. Fanestil DD (1988). Mechanism of action of aldosterone blockers. Semin Nephrol 8:249-263. 8. Gopal Krishna G, Shulman MD, Narins RG (1988). Clinical Use of the Potassium-Sparing Diuretics. Semin Nephrol 8:354-364. 9. Brown JJ, Davies DL, Ferriss JB (1972): Comparison of surgery and prolonged spironolactone therapy in patients with hypertension, aldosterone, excess, and low plasma renin. Br Med J 2:279-734. 10. Kater CE, Biglieri EG, Schambelan, Arteaga EA (1983). Studies of impaired aldosterone response to spironolactone-induced renin and potassium elevations in adenometous but not in hyperplastic pri- mary aldosteronism. Hypertension 5(Suppl. V):V115-V121. l 1. Mantero F, Armanini D, Sonino N, Scaroni C, Fallo F (1983). Il trattamento dell'ipertensione da mineralcorticoidi: diuretici, beta- bloccanti e bilancio idroelettrolitico. Rass Clin-sci 59:189-193. 12. Opocher G, Rocco S, Carpen6 G, Mantero (1993). Differential diagnosis in primary aldosteronism. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 45:49-55. 13. Fallo F, Sonino N, Boscaro M, Armanini D, Mantero F, Dorr HG, Knorr D, Kuhnkle U (1987). Dexamethasone-suppressible hyper- aldosteronism: pathophysiology, clinical aspects and new insights into the pathogenesis. Klin Wochenscher 65:437 A.'H.. Steroids, 1995, vol. 60, January 85
`
`

`

`Papers 14. Scaroni c, Biason A, Carpen6 G, Opocher G, Mantero F (1991). 17ot-hydroxylase deficiency in three siblings: short- and long-term studies. J Endocrinol Invest 14:99-108. 15. Mantero F, Tedde R, Opocher G, Dessi Fulgheri P, Amaldi G, Ulick S (1994). Apparent Mineralocorticoid Excess Type II. Ste- roids 59:80-83. 16. Milson SR, Espinor EA, Nicholls MG, Gwynne J, Perry EG (1986). The blood pressure response to unilateral adrenalectomy in primary aldosteronism. Q J Med 61:1141-1151. 17. Lins P-E, Adamson U (1987). Primary aldosteronism: a follow-up study of 28 cases of surgically treated aldosterone-producing ade- nomas. Acta Med Scand 221:275-282. 18. Groth H, Vetter W, Stimpel M, Greminger P, Tenscherb W, Klaiber E, Vetter H (1985). Adrenalectomy in primary aldosteron- ism: a long term follow up study. Cardiology 72(suppl 1 ):107-116. 19. Young WF, Hogan MJ, Klee GG, Grant CS, Vau Heerden JA (1990). Primary aldosteronism: Diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 65:96-110. Ronchi E, Palumbo G, Grampa A, Farina G, Gradnik R. Leonetti G (1987). Il canrenoato di potassio nel trattamento dell'ipertensione arteriosa un miglioramento rispetto ai precedenti antialdosteronici? Basi Raz Ter XVII:715-719. Nadler JL, Hsueh W, Horton R (1985). Therapeutic effect of cal- cium channel blockade in primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60:896-899. Bravo EL, Fouuad FM, Tarazi RC (1986). Calcium channel block- ade with nifedipine in primary aldosteronism Hypertension 8(Suppl 1):1191-1194. 20. 21. 22. 23. Hsueh WA (1986). New Insights into the medical Management of primary Aldosteronism. Hypertension 8:76--82. 24. Armanini D, Karbowiak I, Goi A, Mantero F, Funder JW (1985). In vivo metabolites of spironolactone and potassium canrenoate: determination of potential anti-androgenic activity by a mouse kid- ney cytosol receptor assay. Clin Endocrinol 23:341-347. 25. Henry M, Wehrlen M, Pelletier B, Capron MH (1990). Spirono- lactone versus nifedipine in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 65:36K-38K. 26. De Valeriola Y, Caloine R (1993). Survey of the efficacy and tolerance of potassium canrenoate in the treatment of essential ar- terial hypertension and congestive heart failure. Acta Therapeutica 19:1-22. 27. Opocher G, Rocco S, Murgia A, Mantero F (1987). Effect of ve- rapamil on aldosterone secretion in primary aldosteronism. J En- docrinol Invest 10:491494. 28. Carpen6 G, Rocco S, Opocher G, Mantero F (1989). Acute and chronic effect of nifedipine in primary aldosteronism. Clin Exp Hyper Theory. Practice Al1:1263-1272. 29. Innocenti S, Andriuoli G, Pozzan T (1994). Canrenone inhibits Ca 2 + influx activated by either depolarization or intracellular store depletion. In: Aldosterone & Hypertension. Lorne, Australia, March 17-19 1994 A(7):1263-1272. 30. Mironneau J (1990). Calcium channel antagonist effects of spirono- lactone, an aldosterone antagonist. Am J Cardiol 65:7K-8K. 31. Griffing GT, Melby JC (1985). The therapeutic effect of a new converting enzyme inhibitor, enalaprilat maleate, in idiopathic hy- peraldosteronism. J Clin Hypertens 3:265-276. 86 Steroids, 1995, vol. 60, January
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket