throbber
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 21 (2003) 380 –383
`
`Seminar article
`Risk factors for male osteoporosis
`
`Francisco A. Conde, R.N., Ph.D.a, William J. Aronson, M.D.b,*
`a Department of Nursing, West Los Angeles-VA Healthcare Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
`b Department of Urology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`Hypogonadism from long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), either by bilateral orchiectomy or administration of gonadotropin-
`releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, causes significant and accelerated bone loss that may increase the risk of bone fractures in men
`with prostate cancer. Recent reports, as well as new data from our institution, have shown a high prevalence of pre-existing osteopenia
`and osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer before receiving ADT, and this is of great concern because of the risk of further bone
`loss during ADT. Data from these studies suggest the urgent need for clinical guidelines for screening, prevention, and treatment of
`these cases. This article reviews the prevalence and risk factors associated with osteoporosis in men and addresses risk factors in men with
`prostate cancer not
`receiving ADT. Considerations for
`the patient selection and timing of bone densitometry will also be
`discussed. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Androgen deprivation therapy; Prostate cancer; Osteoporosis; Orchiectomy; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists
`
`Introduction
`
`Definition of osteoporosis
`
`Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), either by bilateral
`orchiectomy or administration of gonadotropin-releasing
`hormone (GnRH) agonists, remains the mainstay of therapy
`for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Its use is rapidly
`increasing with the inclusion of patients with prostate spe-
`cific antigen (PSA) recurrence or biochemical relapse fol-
`lowing definitive therapy for primary treatment of locally
`advanced prostate cancer. With more aggressive PSA
`screening, many men initiating ADT are younger and
`asymptomatic, and are now faced with the long-term use of
`ADT. Retrospective and prospective studies have consis-
`tently shown that hypogonadism from ADT results in sig-
`nificant bone loss and higher incidence of bone fractures in
`men with prostate cancer than seen in controls [1–9]. Fur-
`ther, reports have also shown a high prevalence of pre-
`existing osteopenia and osteoporosis in men with prostate
`cancer before receiving ADT [5,7,8].
`
`* Corresponding author. Tel.: ⫹1-310-268-3446; Fax: ⫹1-310-268-
`4858.
`E-mail address: waronson@ucla.edu (W.J. Aronson).
`
`1078-1439/$ – see front matter © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00109-1
`
`Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone
`mineral density (BMD) resulting in increased susceptibility
`to bone fractures [10]. Osteoporosis is responsible for more
`than 1.5 million fractures that occur in the United States
`each year. Over 250,000 fractures involve the hip, and it is
`estimated that 20 percent of men with osteoporotic hip
`fractures will die within one year from a complication of the
`injury [11]. Osteoporotic fractures are expected to rise dra-
`matically over the next 50 years as the population continues
`to age and life expectancy increases [12].
`The burden of osteoporosis is largely because of hip and
`vertebral fractures [13]. In 1990, an estimated 30% of 1.7
`million hip fractures occurred in men worldwide [14]. Men
`have a higher mortality after hip fracture than do women
`[14]. Osteoporosis can often cause pain, diminished quality
`of life, decreased physical mobility and independence, in-
`ability to work, and increased burden on caregivers who
`must care for the patient with fracture. Furthermore, in
`1995, the National Osteoporosis Foundation estimated that
`direct care of patients in the United States with osteoporosis
`to be $10 to 20 billion annually.
`Studies have shown that reduction in BMD is the most
`important predictor of osteoporotic fractures in both men
`and women [15,16]. Accordingly, the World Health Orga-
`nization has defined normal, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2025
`Mylan v. Janssen IPR2016-01332
`
`

`

`F.A. Conde, W.J. Aronson / Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 21 (2003) 380 –383
`
`381
`
`established osteoporosis in women based on BMD as com-
`pared to young adult mean values [17]. Normal BMD is
`defined as T-score value ⬎ ⫺1 standard deviation (SD),
`osteopenia as T-score between ⫺1 and ⫺2.5 SD, osteopo-
`rosis as T-score ⬍ ⫺2.5 SD, and established osteoporosis as
`T-score ⬍ ⫺2.5 SD below the young adult mean value in
`the presence of one or more fractures. While these defini-
`tions are based on women, they are also used to diagnose
`osteopenia and osteoporosis in men.
`
`Risk factors for osteoporosis in men
`
`Hypogonadism is a well-established risk factor of osteo-
`porosis in men [18]. Other risk factors include aging, eth-
`nicity, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, deficiency
`in dietary calcium intake, physical inactivity or sedentary
`lifestyle, low body mass index (BMI), certain diseases, and
`medications, particularly chronic use of glucocorticoid
`agents.
`
`Aging
`
`During childhood and adolescence, more bone is formed
`than resorbed. Peak bone mass is reached in the twenties
`and is maintained up to the age of 40 for both men and
`women. After age 40, bone mass begins to decrease at the
`rate of about 0.4 to 1.3% per year in the peripheral skeleton
`of men and women up to age 80. By the age of 80, it is
`estimated that bone mass declines to half its maximum
`value [19].
`Age-related reductions in the number of Leydig cells and
`testosterone levels are associated with bone loss in elderly
`men [14]. An estimated 5-fold increased risk of hip fractures
`was seen among elderly men with age-related hypogonad-
`ism [20]. Among elderly men admitted for spinal osteopo-
`rosis, approximately 5% of the cases were a result of hy-
`pogonadism [21].
`
`Ethnicity
`
`On the average, African-Americans have approximately
`10% greater BMD than Whites in the United States [22].
`Asians have lower BMD when compared with Caucasians.
`However, after controlling for body size, these differences
`are reduced, and the variability of BMD within each race is
`much greater than the differences between races [23].
`
`Smoking
`
`Although the exact mechanism is not clearly understood,
`cigarette smoking is a risk factor for osteoporosis. Vogel
`and colleagues (1997) examined bone density and bone loss
`rates among 1303 Japanese-American men who were cur-
`rent cigarette smokers, past smokers, and nonsmokers [24].
`Results indicated that compared with never smokers, cur-
`
`rent and past smokers had significantly less bone density,
`especially in the cancellous calcaneus and trabecular distal
`radius. Also, the magnitude of the smoking effect was
`strongly associated with the duration of smoking. These
`findings were consistent with the Rotterdam study in which
`a statistically significant higher rate of bone loss was seen in
`both elderly men and women who currently smoked ciga-
`rettes [16].
`
`Alcohol consumption
`
`Moderate alcohol intake is associated with lower risk of
`fracture [25]. However, excessive alcohol consumption is
`associated with low BMD and increased fracture risk among
`men and women. Possible mechanisms include impaired
`calcium metabolism secondary to liver disease and in-
`creased risk for falls because of poor balance [15].
`
`Dietary calcium level
`
`Adequate intake of calcium is necessary for achieving
`optimal peak bone mass during development and maintain-
`ing calcium homeostasis [15,18]. Calcium deficiency in-
`creases bone resorption and is a common cause of acceler-
`ated bone loss in the elderly. In a population-based study
`involving 1,856 elderly men in Rotterdam, Netherlands be-
`tween 1990 through 1995, after adjusting for age, BMI,
`lower limb disability, energy intake, cigarette smoking, and
`alcohol consumption, higher calcium intake was associated
`with lower rates of bone loss in men (P ⫽ 0.04) [16].
`Both American men and women consume less than 800
`mg of calcium per day [26]. Currently, the National Institute
`of Health recommends for men over the age of 63 years old
`to have a calcium intake of 1500 mg/day to prevent osteo-
`porosis [27]. This calcium requirement can be achieved by
`the addition of calcium supplements (such calcium carbon-
`ate, calcium citrate, and calcium phosphate) with dietary
`calcium intake. In a 3 year prospective, randomized, double-
`blind trial, daily intake of 500 mg of calcium with 700 IU of
`vitamin D supplements has been shown to significantly
`increase BMD and reduce the incidence of fractures as
`compared to placebo in both elderly men and women aged
`65 years or older [28].
`
`Physical activity
`
`Physical activity plays an important role in achieving
`peak bone mass during adolescence and is positively asso-
`ciated with BMD in adult males [18,29]. Nguyen et al. [18]
`examined the efficacy of multiple risk factors for osteopo-
`rotic fractures in 820 men aged 60 years or older. They
`found that higher physical activity was protective against
`fracture risk. Similar results were reported by Kujala et al.
`[30] and Kanis et al. [31]. Physical exercise, particularly
`weight bearing exercise, may prevent fractures from falls
`[32]. While the exact exercise prescription for both men and
`
`

`

`382
`
`F.A. Conde, W.J. Aronson / Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 21 (2003) 380 –383
`
`women is currently unknown, benefits of exercise include
`increasing bone density, muscle strength, balance, and co-
`ordination.
`
`BMI
`
`BMI is positively related to BMD [33]. Studies have
`shown that lower BMI scores were associated with BMD
`loss [16,34,35]. As well, increasing BMI is associated with
`a reduced risk of fracture in men [25,36]. Studies also
`suggest that obesity is associated with increased BMD and
`may decrease incidence of fracture in men.
`
`Diseases and medications
`
`Diseases, such as chronic renal failure, hyperparathy-
`roidism, hyperthyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic ob-
`structive pulmonary disease (COPD), and functional loss
`associated with central nervous system disorders, are known
`to cause osteoporosis in men [18]. Glucocorticosteroids are
`extensively used by elderly as anti-inflammatory agents for
`treatment of acute and chronic asthma, chronic lung disease,
`and rheumatoid arthritis [37]. These medications, however,
`causes bone (particularly trabecular bone) loss through sup-
`pression of osteoblastic activity and inhibition of intestinal
`calcium absorption. Also, corticosteroid-related hypocalce-
`mia directly stimulates PTH secretion, causing increased
`osteoclastic bone resorption. Risk factors associated with
`steroid-induced osteoporosis include total cumulative dose,
`daily dose of glucocoticoid, and duration of therapy [38].
`Among 161 ambulatory patients with rheumatic disease
`treated with long-term prednisone, patients who were
`treated with a cumulative dose of less than 10 g of pred-
`nisone had an estimated 23% incidence of osteopenia and
`22% incidence of fracture. Those who received 10 to 30 g
`had a 40% incidence of osteopenia and 33% incidence of
`fracture. Furthermore, patients who received over 30 g had
`78% incidence of osteopenia and of those, 53% had radio-
`graphic evidence of fracture [39].
`Histologic examination of bone among patients treated
`with long-term glucocorticoid therapy revealed an estimated
`20% trabecular volume loss after 5 to 7 months of therapy.
`Also, 63% of individuals who received an average of 5
`years of varying doses of glucocorticoid agents suffered
`significant bone loss [40].
`
`Prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis before ADT
`
`A number of studies have reported a high prevalence of
`osteopenia and osteoporosis in men before receiving ADT
`or on watchful waiting for their prostate cancer. The pres-
`ence of osteopenia and osteoporosis before receiving ADT
`is of great concern because of the expected bone loss during
`long-term ADT, and therefore, these men may be at greater
`risk for developing osteoporotic fracture. Data on the factors
`
`associated with osteopenia and osteoporosis before ADT are
`limited and have not been well established. In a sample of
`12 men (mean age of 78) with advanced prostate cancer,
`Diamond et al. [8] found 75% had osteoporosis in the
`lumbar spine and 33% had osteoporosis in the femoral neck
`before receiving ADT. Wei et al. [7] studied 8 men (median
`age ⫽ 76) with prostate cancer who were not on ADT and
`found 38% with osteopenia and 25% with osteoporosis.
`Risk factors for osteoporosis such as age, ethnicity, physical
`activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and calcium levels
`were examined, but no significant differences were found
`between the ADT and no ADT groups [7]. Recently, in a
`sample of 35 men with a median age of 75, Berruti et al. [5]
`reported pre-existing osteopenia and osteoporosis in the
`lumbar spine (46% and 14%, respectively), and at the hip
`(40% and 4%, respectively). As well, no significant associ-
`ations were found among age, physical activity, alcohol and
`caffeine consumption, calcium intake, and smoking habits
`with changes in BMD using univariate and multivariate
`regression analysis [5]. In our institution, we studied BMD
`of 34 men (mean age ⫽ 69) with nonmetastatic prostate
`cancer who have not received ADT, and we found 73.5%
`had osteopenia (55.9%) or osteoporosis (17.6%) of the lum-
`bar spine and/or femur. In our sample, older age and lower
`BMI were factors significantly associated with bone loss in
`the lumbar spine and femur of these men.
`
`When and for whom should bone mineral density be
`performed?
`
`Currently, it remains unclear if and when bone densi-
`tometry should be obtained in men before, or while receiv-
`ing ADT. For patients about to begin ADT, the urologist or
`caregiver needs to assess the risk factors for osteoporosis
`before initiating therapy. Given that ADT is known to cause
`a progressive decline in BMD and because osteoporosis is
`easier to prevent than to treat, men with significant risk
`factors should undergo BMD studies at baseline. Whether
`all men with prostate cancer should undergo BMD studies at
`baseline remains unclear. Our present practice is to only
`obtain baseline bone density studies in men with risk fac-
`tors, and to wait 2 years while on ADT before obtaining
`bone density studies in men without risk factors given that
`men have a 30 percent higher peak bone mass than women
`[11,41]. At issue is whether merely the diagnosis of prostate
`cancer increases the risk for bone loss, and given the high
`incidence of low bone density in men with prostate cancer
`before receiving ADT [5,7,8], whether all these patients
`should have baseline bone density testing. Larger prospec-
`tive studies will be required to resolve this issue.
`
`References
`
`[1] Daniell H. Osteoporosis after orchiectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol
`1997;157:439 – 44.
`
`

`

`F.A. Conde, W.J. Aronson / Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 21 (2003) 380 –383
`
`383
`
`[2] Daniell HW, Dunn SR, Ferguson DW, et al. Progressive osteoporosis
`during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2000;
`162:181– 6.
`[3] Eriksson S, Eriksson A, Stege R, et al. Bone mineral density in
`patients with prostatic cancer treated with orchidectomy and with
`estrogens. Calcif Tissue Int 1995;57:97–9.
`[4] Hatano T, Oishi Y, Furuta A, et al. Incidence of bone fracture in
`patients receiving luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists
`for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2000;86:449 –52.
`[5] Berruti A, Dogliotti L, Terrone C, et al. Changes in bone mineral
`density, lean body mass and fat content as measured by dual energy
`x-ray absorptiometry in patients with prostate cancer without appar-
`ent bone metastases given androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 2002;
`167:2361–7.
`[6] Townsend MF, Sanders WH, Northway RO, et al. Bone fractures
`associated with leteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists used
`in the treatment of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1997;79:545–50.
`[7] Wei JT, Gross M, Jaffe CA, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy for
`prostate cancer results in significant loss of bone density. Urology
`1999;54:607–11.
`[8] Diamond T, Campbell J, Bryant C, et al. The effect of combined
`androgen blockade on bone turnover and bone mineral densities in
`men treated for prostate cancer. Cancer 1998;83:1561– 6.
`[9] Maillefert JF, Sibilia J, Michel F, et al. Bone mineral density in men
`treated with synthetic gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for
`prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1999;161:1219 –22.
`[10] Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis:
`insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 1995;17(suppl 5):505–11s.
`[11] Watts NB. Osteoporosis. Am Fam Physician 1988;38:193–207.
`[12] Melton LJ III. Epidemiology of hip fractures: implications of the
`exponential increase with age. Bone 1996;18(suppl 3):121s–5s.
`[13] Barrett-Connor E. The economic and human costs of osteoporotic
`fracture. Am J Med 1995;98(suppl 2A):3s– 8s.
`[14] Seeman E. The dilemma of osteoporosis in men. Am J Med 1995;
`98(suppl 2A):76s– 88s.
`[15] Ross PD. Risk factors for osteoporotic fracture. Endocrinol Metab
`Clin North Am 1998;27:289 –301.
`[16] Burger H, de Laet CE, van Daele PL, et al. Risk factors for increased
`bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam study. Am J Epi-
`demiol 1998;147:871–9.
`[17] Blake GM, Fogelman I. Principles of bone densitometry. In: Bilez-
`ikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA, editors. Principles of Bone Biology.
`San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1996. p. 1313–32.
`[18] Orwoll ES. Osteoporosis in men. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am
`1998;27:349 – 65.
`[19] Mundy GR 1995. Bone Remodeling and Its Disorders. London, UK:
`Martin Dunitz Limited.
`[20] Seeman E, Melton LJ III. Risk factors for osteoporosis in men. Am J
`Med 1983;75:977– 83.
`[21] Stanley HL, Schmitt BP, Poses RM, et al. Does hypogonadism
`contribute to the occurrence of a minimal trauma hip fracture in
`elderly men. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:766 –71.
`
`[22] Gambert SR, Schultz BM, Hamdy RC. Osteoporosis. Endocrinol
`Metab Clin North Am 1995;24:317–71.
`[23] Ross PD. Risk factors for osteoporotic fracture. Endocrinol Metab
`Clin North Am 1998;27:289 –301.
`[24] Vogel JM, Davis JW, Nomura A, et al. The effects of smoking on
`bone mass and the rates of bone loss among elderly Japanese-Amer-
`ican men. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:1495–501.
`[25] Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Kelly PJ, et al. Risk factors for osteoporotic
`fractures in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol 1996;144:255– 63.
`[26] Abramowicz M. Calcium supplements. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2000;
`42:29 –30.
`[27] National Institute of Health. Consensus Statement Number 4. Be-
`thesda, MD: National Institute of Health, 1994.
`[28] Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Krall EA, et al. Effect of calcium and
`vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65
`years of age or older. N Eng J Med 1997;337:670 – 6.
`[29] Lunt M, Masaryk P, Scheidt Nave, et al. The effects of lifestyle,
`dietary intake and diabetes on bone density and vertebral deformity
`prevalence: the EVOS study. Osteoporosis Int 2001;12:688 –98.
`[30] Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Kannus P, et al. Physical activity and osteo-
`porotic hip fracture risk in men. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:705– 8.
`[31] Kanis J, Johnell O, Gullberg B, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in
`men from southern Europe: the MEDOS study. Osteoporosis Int
`1999;9:45–54.
`[32] Layne JE, Nelson ME. The effects of progressive resistance training
`on bone density: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31:25–30.
`[33] Kirchengast S, Peterson B, Hauser G, et al. Body composition char-
`acteristics are associated with the bone density of the proximal femur
`end in middle- and old-aged women and men. Maturitas 2001;39:
`133– 45.
`[34] Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CH, et al. Determinants of bone loss in
`elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Os-
`teoporosis Int 1999;10:384 –91.
`[35] Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Risk factors for
`longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham
`Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 2000;15:710 –20.
`[36] Roy DK, O’Neill TW, Finn JD, et al. Determinants of incident
`vertebral fracture in men and women: results from the European
`Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). Osteoporosis Int 2003;14:
`19 –26.
`[37] Rackoff PJ, Rosen CJ. Pathogenesis and treatment of glucocorticoid-
`induced osteoporosis. Drugs Aging 1998;12:477– 84.
`[38] Wolinsky-Friedland M. Drug-induced metabolic bone disease. Endo-
`crinol Metab Clin North Am 1995;24:395– 420.
`[39] Dykman TR, Gluck OS, Murphy WA, et al. Evaluation of factors
`associated with glucocorticoid-induced osteopenia in patients with
`rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28:361– 8.
`[40] LoCascio V, Bonucci E, Imbimbo B, et al. Bone loss in response to
`long-term glucocorticoid therapy. Bone Miner 1990;8:39 –51.
`[41] Christiansen C. Osteoporosis: diagnosis and management today and
`tomorrow. Bone 1995;17(suppl 5):513s– 6s.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket