throbber
Bririrh Jnurnul of Urnlog) ( 1 986). 58,45 5 I
`( 19x6 B r i h h Journal of Urology
`
`Objective Responses to Ketoconazole Therapy in
`Patients with Relapsed Progressive Prostatic Cancer
`
`GORDON WILLIAMS, D. J. KERLE, H. WARE, A. DOBLE, HELEN DUNLOP, C. SMITH,
`JANET ALLEN, T. Y E 0 and S. R. BLOOM
`
`Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital and Ro yal Postgraduate Medical School,
`London
`
`Summary-The contribution of adrenal androgens to the maintenance and progression of so-called
`hormone-unresponsive prostatic carcinoma was studied in 20 patients with advanced relapsed
`disease. The role played by testicular androgens had been negated by prior orchiectomy or
`concurrent LHRH analogue therapy. Ketoconazole, an antifungal agent which inhibits adrenal and
`testicular androgenesis, administered in a dose of 400 mg 8- hourly, resulted in optimal suppression
`of adrenal androgens. The mean serum androstenedione concentration fell from 8.01 f 0.84 nMol/l
`to 1.55 f 0.25 nMol/l, P< 0.001, and serum testosterone from 1.25 f 0.1 4 nMol/l to 0.36 f
`0.06 nMol/l, P<O.Ol, after 6 months treatment. There was, however, no significant difference
`between patients receiving 400 and those receiving 200 mg. Androgen suppression resulted in six
`objective and ten subjective clinical responses. Ablation of both testicular and adrenal androgens
`can now be achieved using ketoconazole in combination with orchiectomy or LHRH analogues, but
`the high incidence of side effects may preclude its use in all patients with prostatic cancer. The
`results of this study support the concept of "total androgen ablation" as primary therapy in advanced
`prostatic cancer as a possible means of improving survival in this common malignancy.
`
`Endocrine treatment of advanced prostatic cancer
`has been aimed at suppressing the major source of
`circulating testosterone from the testes and is
`achieved by either oestrogen administration, which
`inhibits pituitary secretion of gonadotrophins, or
`orchiectomy. Initial clinical response rates of 70 to
`80% following either form of therapy have been
`reported (Resnick and Grayhack, 1975; White-
`head, 1981). However, most of these patients will
`relapse in 2 to 3 years of commencing endocrine
`therapy, and once relapse occurs 50% will die
`within 6 months. These therapies do not suppress
`adrenal androgens, which may
`increase after
`orchiectomy and encourage continued tumour
`growth (Sciarra et al., 1973). Attempts to inhibit
`adrenal androgen production using pituitary abla-
`tion, adrenalectomy (Murphy et al., 1971) or ami-
`noglutethimide (Sanford et al., 1976; Worgul et al.,
`__. .~~~ ~-
`Accepted for publication 9 April 1985
`
`~~
`
`~
`
`1983) have been made in patients who have failed
`conventional endocrine treatment. These latter
`therapies all have considerable disadvantages and
`when instituted for end-stage relapsed disease, ob-
`jective response rates are poor and of short
`duration (Sanford et al., 1976; Fitzpatrick et al.,
`1980; Worgul et al., 1983). The use of these forms
`of therapy as a component of primary endocrine
`treatment has not been attempted because of the
`high incidence of serious side effects. Steroid sup-
`plements, which are obligatory following pituitary
`ablation or aminoglutethimide therapy, may be re-
`sponsible in part for the adrenal suppression
`achieved.
`Ketoconazole, an imidazole antifungal agent,
`has been shown to inhibit both testicular and
`adrenal androgenesis (Pont et al., 1982a and b).
`Objective responses following ketoconazole ad-
`ministration in patients with newly diagnosed pros-
`tatic cancer have been reported (Trachtenburg and
`
`45
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2020
`Mylan v. Janssen IPR2016-01332
`
`

`

`46
`
`Pont, IY84), but serum testosterone did not reach
`castrate levels in all patients and its short duration
`of action necessitates a strict 8-hourly dose regime.
`We have previously reported two patients with
`relapsed progressive disease treated with ketocona-
`zole who have shown an improvement in objective
`response measurements (Allen et al., 1983). We
`now present our experience of ketoconazole
`administration in a further 20 patients.
`
`Patients and Methods
`Informed consent was obtained prior to treatment
`from 20 patients aged 55 to 77 years (mean 68.5)
`with histologically confirmed prostatic carcinoma
`who had relapsed following single or multiple se-
`quential endocrine therapy (Table 1). Each patient
`
`Table 1 Previous Hormonal Therapies
`
`Previous liormonui ireuiment
`
`LHRH
`Oestrogen + orchiectomy
`Oestrogcn + LHRH
`Orchiectomy+ LHRH
`Orchiectomy + oestrogen +
`LHRH
`Orchiectomy + cyproterone
`acetate+ LHRH
`
`Time from initial
`diugnosrs 10
`introduction o/
`ketoconazole
`(months)
`
`8.5
`24
`23
`29
`
`43
`
`60
`
`1
`
`underwent the following staging procedures: digital
`rectal examination, tartrate labile acid phospha-
`tase, alkaline phosphatase, intravenous urography,
`technetium labelled bone scanning with appropri-
`ate radiographs, and in one patient a sagittal sec-
`tion nuclear magnetic resonance scan before and 6
`months after treatment. All objective response
`measurements were documented at regular inter-
`vals throughout the study, using the British Pros-
`tate Group Criteria.
`Subjective criteria were recorded before treat-
`ment and at each subsequent visit using a scoring
`system for activity, pain and analgesia (Oken et al.,
`1982). Blood for measurement of serum testoster-
`one and dihydrotestosterone (Ghanadian et al.,
`1975), androstenedione (Ghanadian and Puah,
`1 Y83), cortisol by “Gamma Coat” kit (Clinical As-
`says, Cambridge, USA), ACTH (Rees et al., 1971)
`and LH (Marshall et al., 1973) were taken before
`treatment, at 5 days, 2 weeks, 1 month and
`monthly thereafter. All samples for endocrine as-
`sessment were collected between 9 and 10a.m. On
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
`
`the first treatment day 4- and 8-h samples were
`taken to measure the acute response of androstene-
`dione to a single dose of ketoconazole. The diurnal
`rhythm of serum cortisol and ACTH was studied in
`all patients after 6 months of ketoconazole therapy.
`Those patients who had not received a prior
`orchiectomy and were taking the LHRH analogue
`ICI 118630, 250 pg daily, were continued on this
`therapy.
`Ketoconazole was administered to 15 patients at
`a dose of 400mg 8-hourly (high dose) but was
`reduced to 200 mg 8-hourly (low dose) in 6 patients
`because of anorexia and nausea, after a mean inter-
`val of 30 days (range 5-70). The remaining five
`patients started on 200mg tds. A satisfactory clini-
`cal response has been reported at this lower dose
`(Trachtenburg et d., 1983). Endocrine data were
`analysed in accordance with the dose of ketocona-
`zole being administered at the time of each follow-
`up visit and were expressed as mean f SEM. Sig-
`nificance was determined using paired and
`unpaired Students t tests.
`
`Results
`Clinicul
`Eight patients died of progressive metastatic dis-
`ease within 14 weeks of commencing treatment
`(mean 7.5 weeks, range 4-14) (Fig. I). Six of these
`
`13
`12
`1 1
`10
`9 E
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`Months
`Fig. 1
`Clinical outcome in 20 patients with advanced relapsed
`prostatic cancer following two dose regimes of ketoconazole.
`
`8
`
`10
`
`1
`12
`
`patients were on low dose and two on high dose
`regimes.
`Eleven patients have survived for more than 14
`weeks. Four maintained on low dose therapy are
`alive for a mean period of 8 months. Partial objec-
`tive response was documented in one patient and
`
`

`

`OBJECTlVE RESPONSES TO KETOCONAZOLE THERAPY
`
`47
`
`Table 2 Changes in Objective Response Measurements and Resulting Clinical Response (British Prostate Group) in
`1 I Patients Following 6 Months of Ketoconazole Therapy
`
`Puiicvr
`
`Dose
`
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`9
`11
`I
`7
`8
`10
`
`1200 mg/day
`
`1.
`
`1.
`
`., 1.
`
`, I
`
`1,
`
`,, 7,
`
`> >
`
`9 1
`
`1,
`
`1,
`
`600 mg/day
`.. ,.
`
`7 ,
`
`I ,
`
`1,
`
`7.
`
`T srage
`
`TO-TO
`T4-+T4
`TI -+TO
`TO+TO
`T4 -+ T4
`T3+T4
`TO-TO
`T3 +TO
`TO-TO
`T4-+T4
`T4-T4
`
`Acidphos. (iu/l)
`
`I25 - 322
`
`28-25
`20-6
`
`2.9-N
`6-N
`6-N
`9-N
`68-69
`5.4-N
`1.8-2.1
`241 -6.5
`
`Bone .scans
`
`Clinical response
`
`Stable
`Stable
`Improved
`Stable
`Improved
`Worse
`Complete resolution
`Stable
`Worse
`Worse
`Resolution some lesions
`
`Stable
`Partial
`Partial
`Partial
`Partial
`Progression
`Complete
`Stable
`Progression
`Progression
`Partial
`
`A
`
`Sagittal section nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) scans (A) before and (B) after 6 months ketoconazole 400 mg tds. Pros-
`Fig. 2
`tatic turnour volume has halved and the previously stenosed bowel lumen is clearly visible.
`
`another has stable disease, but the other two have
`shown evidence of disease progression manifest by
`worsening bone scans. Seven patients have been on
`high dose therapy throughout and have shown evi-
`dence of response (Table 2). The likelihood of a re-
`sponse to ketoconazole did not appear to relate to
`any previous combination of therapies,
`
`resonance scanning (Figs. 2A and B) and serial
`ultrasonography. Digital assessment in the remain-
`ing patients showed a prostate tumour volume
`reduction of at least 50% in two patients (4 and 6).
`Downstaging of the prostatic tumour occurred in
`one of these. No change in the state of local disease
`was detected in the remaining four patients.
`
`Objective Response
`1. Local disease
`The volume of prostatic tumour halved and uni-
`
`2. Prostatic Acid Phosphatuse
`The tartrate labile acid phosphatase was elevated in
`11 of 12 patients who commenced and continued
`on high dose therapy for at least 1 month. Values
`fell by more than 50% in seven of these within this
`first manth of treatment and have reached the nor-
`
`

`

`48
`
`.-.
`
`-J +
`
`
`
`i
`40 -1
`
`201
`
`r~
`0
`
`1
`
`I
`2
`
`I
`3
`
`I
`I
`5
`4
`Months
`Fig. 3 The tartrate labile acid phosphatase fell by more than
`50% in seven patients following ketoconazole 400mg tds. This
`initial fall is maintained in six patients and three have normal
`valucs after 6 months' treatment.
`
`1
`6
`
`I
`7
`
`I
`8
`
`I
`9
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
`
`Table 3 Changes in the Subjective Scores After Keto-
`conazolc. Significant Responses are Indicated by an
`Improvement ofTwo or More Points (Rees r t a/., 1971)
`
`Subjective scnre: points improve-
`ment
`
`Time
`_
`One month
`
`_
`
`Threemonths
`
`Six months
`
`Dose
`
`~
`
`High
`Low
`High
`Low
`High
`Low
`
`1 2 2
`~
`5
`6
`6
`I
`7
`2
`
`I
`2
`
`1
`
`4 orrnorc
`
`
`
`6
`
`~
`
`3
`
`1
`
`0.12 nMol/l (n = 6, P> 0.1) after 6 months' high
`
`dose treatment and to 0.64 f 0.06nMol/l (n = 6,
`P>0.3) after 3 months of low dose therapy.
`Serum cortisol remained within
`the normal
`range (200-700 nMol/l) during the course of study
`in all patients. The mean serum concentration
`changed from 747 f 77 nMol/l (n = 17) to 548 f
`80nMol/l (n=6, P>O.O5) after 6 months of high
`dose ketoconazole treatment. Low dose resulted in
`a fall to 544.5nMol/l in two patients after 6
`months.
`The serum ACTH was in the normal range (10-
`80ng/l) in 12 of 14 patients studied prior to treat-
`ment. Six of these patients (five high dose and one
`low dose) showed elevation of serum ACTH (range
`88-31 1 ng/l) within 3 days of commencing treat-
`ment. There was a progressive rise in four of these
`patients alive after 3 months' treatment. Of the two
`patients alive at 6 months, the serum ACTH has
`returned to normal in one. The six patients with no
`rise in ACTH at the beginning of treatment re-
`mained normal throughout the period of study.
`Five further patients had ACTH estimations for
`the first time after 6 months' treatment and four
`(two high and two low dose) were elevated (range
`89-260 ng/l).
`The diurnal variation of serum cortisol and
`ACTH was studied in seven patients (four high and
`three low dose) between 6 and 12 months of keto-
`conazole therapy. The 8a.m. serum cortisol was
`normal in all patients but at midnight four patients
`(two high and two low dose) had elevated levels
`(range 260-450 nmol/l; normal range < 250 nmol/
`1).
`
`Correspondingly, four patients (three high and
`one low dose) had elevated serum ACTH concen-
`trations at 8a.m. (range 154-260ng/l) and three
`were normal. At midnight all ACTH values were
`elevated (range 27-94 ng/l; normal range < 10 ng/l).
`
`ma1 range in three of eight patients treated with
`high dose therapy for 3 months (Fig. 3).
`
`3. Bone Scans
`Seven patients who had been on high dose therapy
`for 6 months had a further bone scan. Three scans
`have improved, with resolution of lesions con-
`firmed radiographically, and three remain stable.
`Patient 4 had an improvement in both local tumour
`and bone scan but also a steady rise in acid phos-
`phatase; the bone scan showed no new lesions,
`improvement of existing lesions and resolution of
`some. These changes in objective response param-
`eters are summarised in Table 2.
`
`Subjective Response
`The changes in the subjective scores are shown in
`Table 3. The maximum benefit was seen in the first
`month's treatment.
`
`Endocrine Response
`A prompt fall in the mean serum androstene-
`dione concentration was seen within 8 h of com-
`mencing therapy and was most marked in patients
`on high dose (Fig. 4A). The continuing fall in both
`groups is shown in Figure 4B. All patients had cas-
`trate levels of serum testosterone before treatment.
`Further falls in the mean serum concentrations of
`testosterone are shown in Figure 5.
`The mean serum concentration of dihydrotestos-
`terone fell from 0.85 f 0.07 nMol/l
`to 0.47 f
`
`

`

`1 1 3
`
`OBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO KETOCONAZOLE THERAPY
`
`5
`
`1 8
`
`-
`0
`c E
`aJ
`C
`
`0 .- B
`c
`al U
`m e
`D c a
`
`l o 8
`
`(
`
`5
`
`
`
`K
`
`J.
`8
`
`49
`
`5
`
`2
`
`I
`2
`
`I
`6
`
`1
`8
`
`B
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`90
`
`180
`
`210
`
`A
`
`f
`0
`
`~
`
`I
`30
`4
`Days
`Hours
`Fig. 4 Mean serum androstenedione concentrations following institution of ketoconazole therapy (K) 400 mg tds
`and
`- -. (A) Suppression is seen after 8 h of single dose of 200 mg (P=0.04) and 400mg of ketoconazole (P = 0.005). (B) A
`200mg tds
`significant difference between the two dose regimes after 8 h (Pi0.001) is not maintained during long-term follow-up.
`1.6 7
`
`5
`
`1 9
`T
`
`I
`K
`
`: 0 . 8
`e
`
`0 . 0 J
`
`1
`
`-+l-+l-+fl
`0
`10
`
`20
`
`90
`
`180
`
`300
`
`30
`Days
`Fig. 5 Mean serum testosterone following institution of keto-
`conazole therapy (K) 400 mg tds --
`200 mg tds. A
`and --
`significant fall below castrate concentrations is seen following
`180 days of high dose therapy (P <O.OI).
`
`~
`
`Side Effects
`Eleven of the 20 patients complained of nausea and
`anorexia immediately after institution of ketocona-
`zole therapy (8 high dose and 3 low dose). Dosage
`was reduced to 200 mg 8-hourly in six of the eight
`high dose patients but nausea persisted in four,
`requiring withdrawal of the drug in one. A persis-
`tent but acceptable level of nausea was tolerated by
`six high dose and three low dose patients through-
`out the treatment period.
`Six high dose patients showed a transient rise in
`
`~
`
`the serum aspartate transaminase (range 5 1-77 iu/k
`normal range 21-40) which occurred between 5
`days and 2 months following the start of ketocona-
`zole. In only one patient was this associated with
`elevation of serum bilirubin to 22 pmol/l (normal
`range 4-17) after 1 month of therapy. The serum
`bilirubin rose transiently in two further patients,
`one high dose and one low dose, to I8 pmol/l after 2
`months and 21 pmol/l after 3 months’ treatment
`respectively but returned to normal without drug
`withdrawal. None of the patients who have been on
`therapy for more than six months has any abnor-
`mality of liver function.
`Hypocalcaemia developed in two patients, one
`high dose and one low dose. The serum calcium fell
`to 1.87nmol/l after 5 days’ treatment in the high
`dose patient (normal range 2.15-2.65) and re-
`mained low during 4 months of ketoconazole treat-
`ment. The low dose patient was hypocalcaemic
`prior to ketoconazole treatment but fell further to
`1.65 nmol/l after introduction of the drug.
`
`Discussion
`Between 60 and 80% of patients with prostatic
`cancer respond to endocrine therapy aimed at low-
`ering serum testosterone. Because of this success in
`the palliation of symptoms there has been little de-
`viation from conventional treatment using oestro-
`gens or orchiectomy as primary therapy.
`
`

`

`50
`
`However, after 2 to 3 years’ treatment the major-
`ity of patients will relapse and this is thought to in-
`dicate the development of tumour cells growing
`independently of their hormone environment. It is
`not surprising that further clinical responses are
`rarely seen following additional hormonal manipu-
`lation directed solely at the pituitary gonadal axis
`(Stone et ul., 1980; Allen et al., 1984).
`Man is unique in having adrenals which secrete
`large quantities of pre-cursor steroids which are
`converted into potent androgens. The adrenal out-
`put accounts for up to 10% of androgen produc-
`tion and remains unaffected by conventional
`endocrine therapy with oestrogens or orchiectomy.
`Furthermore, following such therapy intraprosta-
`tic concentration of dihydrotestosterone, the most
`active androgen within the prostate, remains as
`high as 50% of levels found in intact patients
`(Geller ef ul., 1979). High doses of ketoconazole, a
`widely used drug for the treatment of fungal dis-
`eases, blocks the synthesis of testosterone in both
`the testes and the adrenals at a cytochrome P450
`dependent step, i.e. where I7 alpha, 20 alpha
`dihydroxy-progesterone
`is
`transformed
`into
`androstcnedione.
`This inhibition of adrenal androgen production
`by ketoconazole has allowed us to evaluate the role
`of these androgens in patients with advanced
`relapsed prostatic cancer-tumours
`thought to be
`hormone-independent. Recent
`refinements
`in
`radioimmunoassay techniques for androgen assay
`and the acceptance of standard response criteria in
`prostate cancer have enabled us to correlate adre-
`nal androgen suppression with clinical response.
`The patients treated all had severe disease, eight
`dying from their malignancy within 14 weeks. Sub-
`jective improvement was seen in 10 patients within
`the first 3 months of treatment, though the major-
`ity of these were in the first month. One patient on
`high dose ketoconazole, who had been confined to
`bed with severe perineal pain, was able to mobilise
`to near-normal activity and withdraw from narco-
`tic analgesia. This degree of improvement was
`unlikely to be due to a placebo effect. Of the I I
`patients alive at 6 months and assessed by the
`British Prostate Group criteria of response (Chis-
`holm and Beynon, 1983), one complete and five
`partial responses were seen. The objective re-
`sponses of some patients were dramatic, in particu-
`lar the relief of almost total rectal occlusion by a
`massive encircling tumour (Fig 2A and B), and a
`complete resolution of secondaries confirmed by
`bone scan in another.
`This study has shown that ketoconazole mark-
`
`BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
`
`edly inhibits production of androstenedione at
`both dose regimes and produces further significant
`falls in the already castrate levels of testosterone
`and dihydrotestosterone; although not measured in
`this study, an elevation of progestogens could be
`expected.
`These results strongly suggest that adrenal
`androgens play a significant role in the mainten-
`ance of some so-called hormone-unresponsive
`prostatic tumours and provide further evidence for
`the concept of total androgen ablation (Znter-
`nutionnl Journal of’ Andrology, 1984) for the prim-
`ary treatment of prostatic cancer.
`Alterations in serum cortisol occurred at some
`stage in most patients during the course of treat-
`ment. However, no patient had levels below the
`normal range and cortisol supplements were not
`required. Maintenance of a cortisol within the nor-
`mal range has been achieved by elevation of ACTH
`in most patients. Medical adrenalectomy achieved
`with, aminoglutethimide (Sanford et al., 1976; Fitz-
`patrick et al., 1980) invariably requires cortisol re-
`placement and this may, in part, account for the
`clinical effects seen.
`Aminoglutethimide, an alternative means of pro-
`ducing a medical adrenalectomy, is not without
`side effects, nor is ketoconazole. Six patients were
`unable to tolerate high dose therapy because of
`persistent nausea, although this does not appear to
`be a problem when ketoconazole syrup is used
`rather than ketoconazole tablets. Ketoconazole is
`also hepatotoxic in some patients (Heiberg and
`Sveggaard, 1981; Lewis et nl., 1984) and has
`recently been the subject of a warning by the Com-
`mitkee on Safety of Medicines. The incidence of
`liver disease is approximately 1 in 15,000 and does
`not appear to be dose-related (Hay, 1985). Some
`transient abnormalities of liver function occurred
`in 50% of our patients but resolved despite con-
`tinuation of therapy.
`Fifty per cent of patients with progressive hor-
`monally unresponsive prostatic cancer will die
`within 6 months.
`Chemotherapy is not particularly effective and
`significant side effects are almost invariable in this
`elderly group of patients (Murphy, 1984). Signifi-
`cant objective benefit from aminoglutethimide is
`unusual and severe lethargy makes it unacceptable
`in many patients. We therefore feel that ketocona-
`zole does have a role in this group of patients pro-
`vided they are shown to have no pre-existing liver
`disease and that they are adequately monitored in
`specialist centres.
`We cannot support the view of Trachtenburg
`
`

`

`OBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO KETOCONAZOLE THERAPY
`
`and Pont (1984) for the use of ketoconazole as a
`single primary therapy because of its inadequate
`testosterone control in the intact male. It may have
`a role in combination with orchiectomy or an
`LHRH analogue aiming for total androgen abla-
`tation. These studies are under way.
`
`References
`Allen, J. M., Kerle, D., Ware, H., Dohle, A., Williams, G. and
`Bloom, S. R. (1983). Combined treatment with ketoconazole
`and LHRH analogue: a novel approach to resistant progress-
`ive prostate cancer. Briti,sh Medicul Journal, 287, 1766.
`Allen, J. M., Williams, G., O’Shea, J. P., Smith, C., Yeo, T.,
`Kerle, D. and Bloom, S. R. (1984). The effect of previous
`endocrine therapy on responses to a single dose of an LHRH
`analogue. Urologicul Reseurch, 12, 249-25 I .
`Chisholm, G. D. and Beynon, L. L. (1983). The response of
`malignant prostate to endocrine treatment. In The Endocrin-
`ologj, of’ Prosfute Tumours, ed. Ghanadian. R. Pp. 241-262.
`Lancaster: MTP Press.
`Fitzpatrick, J. M., Gardiner, R. A., Williams, J. P., Riddle, P. R.
`and O’Donoghue, E. P. N. (1980). Pituitary ablation in the re-
`lief of pain in advanced prostatic carcinoma. British Journal
`of Urology. 52, 301-304.
`Celler, J., Albert, J. and Loza, D. (1979). Steroid levels in cancer
`of the prostate; markers of tumour differential and adequacy
`of antiandrogen therapy. Journal ofsteroid Biochemistry, 11,
`63 1-636.
`Ghanadian, R., Lewis, J. G. and Chisholm, G. D. (1975). Serum
`testosterone and dihydrotestosterone changes with age in rat.
`Steroid.c. 25. 753-762.
`Ghanadian, R. and Puah, C. M. (1983). The clinical significance
`of steroid hormone measurements in the management of
`patients with prostatic cancer. World Journal of Urology. i,
`49-54.
`Hay, R. J. (1985). Ketoconazole: a re-appraisal. British Medical
`Journal. 290, 260.
`Heiherg, J. K. and Svejgaard, E. (198 I). Toxic hepatitis during
`ketoconazole treatment. British Medical Journal, 228, 825-
`826.
`International Journal of Andrology (1984). A new approach in
`the hormonal treatment of prostate cancer: complete instead
`of partial blockade of androgens. Internationul Journal of’
`An(lro1og.v. 7. 1-4.
`Lewis, J. H., Zimmerman, H. J., Benson, G. D. and Isak, K. G.
`(1984). Hepatic injury associated with ketoconazole therapy:
`analysis of 33 cases. Gastroenterology, 86, 503-51 3.
`Marshall, J. C., Anderson, D. C., Fraser, T. R. and Harsoulis, P.
`(1973). Human luteinising hormone in man. Studies of
`metabolism and biological action. Journal qf Endocrinology,
`56,43 1-439.
`Murphy, G. P. (1984). Chemotherapy: is it effective in treatment
`of prostatic cancer? Supplernenf of Urology, 24,5,41-47.
`Murphy, G . P., Reynoso, G., Schoonees, R., Gailani, S., Bourke,
`R., Kenny, G. M., Mirand, E. A. and Schalch, D. S. (1971).
`Hypophysectomy and adrenalectomy for disseminated pros-
`tate carcinoma. Journal of Urology, 105, 817-825.
`Oken, M. M., Creech, F. H., Tormey, D. C., Harton, J., Davis,
`T. E., McFadden, E. T. and Carbone, P. P. (1982). Toxicity
`
`51
`
`and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology
`groups. American Journal oJClinicu1 Oncology, 6, 649-655.
`Pont, A., Williams, P. L., Azhar, S., Reitz, R. E., Bochra, C.,
`Smith, E. R. and Stevens, D. A. (1982a). Ketoconazole blocks
`testosterone synthesis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 142,
`2 137-2 140.
`Pont. A., Williams, P. L., Loose, D. S., Feldman, D., Reitz,
`R. G., Bochra, C. and Stevens, D. A. (1982b). Ketoconazole
`blocks adrenal steroid synthesis. Annals oflnlernul Medicine,
`97. 370-372.
`Rees, L. H., Cook, D. M., Kendall, J. W., Allen, C. F., Kramer,
`R. M., Ratcliffe, J. G. and Knight, R. A. (1971). A radio-
`immunoassay for rat plasma ACTH. Endocrinology, 89, 254-
`261.
`Resnick, M. and Grayhack, J. T. (1975). Treatment of stage IV
`carcinoma of the prostate. Urologic Clinics ofNorth America,
`2, 17.5- 182.
`Sciarra, F., Sorcini, G., Di Silverio, F. and Gagliardi, V. (1973).
`Testosterone and androstenedione after orchiectomy in pros-
`tatic adenocarcinoma. Clinical Endocrinology, 2, 101 -109.
`Sanford, E. J., Drago, J. R., Rohner, T. J., Santen, R. and Lip-
`ton, A. ( 1976). Aminoglutethimide medical adrenalectomy for
`advanced prostatic carcinoma. Journal of’ Urology, 115, 170-
`174.
`Stone, A. R., Hargreave, T. B. and Chisholm, G. D. (1980). The
`diagnosis of oestrogen escape and the role of secondary
`orchiectomy in prostatic cancer. British Journal of Urology,
`52,535-538.
`Trachtenberg, J., Halpern, N. and Pont, A. (1983). Ketocona-
`zole: a novel and rapid treatment for advanced prostatic
`cancer. Journal of Urology, 130, 152-1 53.
`Trachtenberg, J. and Pont, A. (1984). Ketoconazole therapy for
`advanced prostate cancer. Lancet, 2,433-43.5.
`Whitehead, E. D. (1981). Management of prostate carcinoma.
`New York State JournalofMedicine, 81, 1481-1485.
`Worgul, T. J., Santen, R. J., Samojlik, E., Veldhuis, J. O., Lip-
`ton, A., Harvey, H. A., Drago, J. R. and Rohner, T. J. (1983).
`Clinical and biochemical effect of aminoglutethimide in the
`treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Journal qf Urol-
`ogy, 129.51-55.
`
`The Authors
`
`Gordon Williams, FRCS, Consultant Urologist.
`D . J. Kerle, FRCS, Senior Urological Registrar.
`H. Ware, MB,BS, Senior House Officer, Department of Urol-
`ogy.
`A. Doble, MB,BS, Senior House Officer, Department of Urol-
`ogy.
`Helen Dunlop, BSc, Research Assistant, Department of Urol-
`ogy.
`C. Smith, MA, MPhil, Research Assistant, Department of Urol-
`ogy,
`Janet Allen, BSc, MRCP, Medical Registrar.
`T. Yeo, BSc, PhD, Senior Biochemist, Department of Medicine.
`S. R. Bloom, DSc, FRCP, Professor, Department of Endocrin-
`ology.
`
`Requests for reprints to: Gordon Williams, Department of
`Urology, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London
`W12OHS.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket