throbber
REVIEW
`
`ELSEVIER
`
`GLUCOCORTICOIDS AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE
`CANCER: A PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL REVIEW
`
`MARWAN FAKIH, CANDACE S. JOHNSON, AND DONALD L. TRUMP
`
`G lucocorticoids have been used for a substan(cid:173)
`
`tial period to treat patients with advanced an(cid:173)
`drogen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Al(cid:173)
`though known for their anti-inflammatory activity,
`glucocorticoids have antitumor activity in various
`hematologic malignancies. The role of glucocorti(cid:173)
`coids as antineoplastic agents in epithelial tumors
`is less well defined. Their use in these tumors has
`been strictly palliative.
`Glucocorticoids have been widely used in the
`treatment of advanced prostate cancer and have
`served as the "standard" therapy arm in several
`randomized studies. Although multiple studies of
`glucocorticoid use in prostate cancer have been
`conducted, their therapeutic role remains unclear.
`We review the information regarding the mecha(cid:173)
`nisms underlying glucocorticoid antitumor effects
`in prostate cancer and critically review the results
`of clinical trials using these agents.
`
`MECHANISMS OF ACTIVITY
`
`The cytotoxic effect of glucocorticoids in hema(cid:173)
`tologic cells is well defined. 1
`4 Glucocorticoids
`-
`bind to a cytosolic receptor that localizes to the
`nucleus, leading to a variety of transcriptional
`modifications. This ultimately results in upregula(cid:173)
`tion of multiple caspases, leading to apoptotic cell
`death. 5 Glucocorticoids do not induce apoptosis in
`prostate cancer cells, let growth inhibitory effects
`are well documented. '7 We have demonstrated di(cid:173)
`rect antiproliferative effects in the hormone-refrac(cid:173)
`tory human PC-3 and rat Mat-Ly-Lu cell lines as
`
`Supported by grants from the Mary Hillman Jennings Foundation
`and CaPCURE. D. L. Trump and C. S.]ohnson receive research
`fundingfrom Bristol Myers Squibb, Aventis, and D-Novo.
`From the Departments of Medicine, Division of Hemato1ogy(cid:173)
`Onco1ogy and Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh School of
`Medicine; and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pitts(cid:173)
`burgh, Pennsylvania
`Reprint requests: DonaldL. Trump, M.D., Department of Med(cid:173)
`icine, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Montefiore Uni(cid:173)
`versity Hospital, N 723, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA
`15213
`Submitted: January 30, 2002, accepted (with revisions): March
`28,2002
`
`measured by cell cycle arrest and modulation of the
`cdk inhibitors, p21 and p27. The mechanisms of
`this growth inhibitory effect are not clear. How(cid:173)
`ever, several mechanisms have been postulated.
`
`SUPPRESSION OF ADRENAL ANDROGEN
`SECRETION
`
`Glucocorticoids may exert an antitumor effect
`on androgen-independent prostate cancer by sup(cid:173)
`pression of adrenal androgens. Low-dose glu(cid:173)
`cocorticoids produce negative feedback on the pi(cid:173)
`tuitary gland, leading to a decrease in both
`testicular and adrenal androgens. 8
`9 Plowman et
`'
`al. 10 reported on 17 orchiectomized patients with
`progressive prostate cancer who were treated with
`hydrocortisone 30 mg/day. A significant decrease
`in testosterone, androstenedione, and dihydroan(cid:173)
`drostenedione (DHEAS) levels was noted with
`therapy. Similarly, Tannock et al. 11 noted a de(cid:173)
`crease
`in
`testosterone, androstenedione, and
`DHEAS levels in association with low-dose pred(cid:173)
`nisone therapy (7.5 to 10 mg daily) in surgically or
`medically castrated patients with advanced pros(cid:173)
`tate cancer. Symptomatic relief was associated with
`a decrease in the adrenal androgen levels. Eight of
`13 patients who had a decrease in DHEAS levels by
`1 µ,mol/L or greater had improvement in pain and
`only 1 of 8 patients with unchanged or increased
`DHEAS levels had symptomatic improvement.
`
`PARACRINE/AUTOCRINE FACTOR
`MODULATION
`
`Glucocorticoids can inhibit prostate cancer cell
`growth by modulating cellular growth factors such
`as lipocortin, tumor growth factor beta-I (TGF/3-
`1), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA),
`and interleukin-6 (IL-6).
`
`LIPOCORTIN
`Glucocorticoids mediate their anti-inflammatory
`effects in part by way of lipocortin, a member of the
`annexin family (calcium and phospholipid-bind(cid:173)
`ing proteins) .12
`13 Lipocortin gene transcription is
`'
`upregulated by glucocorticoids, resulting in in-
`
`© 2002, EISEVIER SCIENCE lNC.
`Ali RIGHTS RESERVED
`
`UROLOGY 60: 553-561, 2002 • 0090-4295/02/$22.00
`PII S0090-4295(02)01741-7 553
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000075
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`creased cellular levels. Lipocortin is subsequently
`secreted from the cells to mediate its anti-inflam(cid:173)
`matory effects at the membrane level by inhibiting
`15 Lipocortin also mediates,
`phospholipase A2. 14
`'
`at least in part, the antiproliferative effects of glu(cid:173)
`cocorticoids. Carollo et al. 6 showed that the inhib(cid:173)
`itory effect of dexamethasone on androgen inde(cid:173)
`pendent PC-3 cells is completely abolished if the
`cells are incubated with sheep antihuman lipocor(cid:173)
`tin antibodies. The mechanism through which li(cid:173)
`pocortin mediates its antiproliferative effect is not
`well defined.
`
`TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA-1
`TGF-/31 is a member of a group of dimeric pep(cid:173)
`tides that modulate multiple cellular functions, in(cid:173)
`cluding extracellular matrix expression, differenti(cid:173)
`ation, and cellular proliferation. 16 TGF-/31 has
`dual inhibitory and stimulatory effects on the
`growth of prostate cancer. Hsing et al. 17 treated
`both tumorigenic (NRP-154) and nontumorigenic
`(NRP-152) rat prostate cell lines with TGF-/31.
`TGF-/31 induced cell death by apoptosis in both
`cell lines. The effects were enhanced by dexameth(cid:173)
`asone and inhibited by insulin growth factor-1.
`Dexamethasone increased TGF-/31 mRNA expres(cid:173)
`sion in androgen-insensitive PA-Ill prostate cancer
`cell lines in association with growth inhibitory ef(cid:173)
`fects.18 Co-treatment of PA-Ill with TGF-/31 anti(cid:173)
`body reversed the dexamethasone antiprolif erative
`effects. This suggests that the inhibitory role of
`dexamethasone may be mediated by TGF-{31. 18
`Barrack19 and Morton and Barrack,20 on the other
`hand, showed that TGF-/31 was implicated in tu(cid:173)
`mor progression. They showed that although
`TGF-/31 had no inhibitory effects on the growth of
`the hormone-independent, rat prostate Mat-Ly-Lu
`cancer cell line, it stimulated motility and fibronec(cid:173)
`tin expression. 20
`
`UROKINASE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR
`uPA, a serine protease, is implicated in the pro(cid:173)
`gression of various malignancies, including pros(cid:173)
`tate cancer. Serum uPA levels are higher in patients
`with metastatic prostate cancer than in those with
`localized disease. 21 uP A increases the invasiveness
`and stimulates tumor migration and growth when
`expressed in hormone-responsive human prostate
`LNCaP cell lines.22'23 Furthermore, uPA has direct
`stimulatory effects on osteosarcoma cells and may
`play an important role in the patho~hysiology of
`blastic lesions in prostate cancer. 24- 6 Dexameth(cid:173)
`asone downregulates uPA mRNA and its protein
`expression in both PC-3 and PA-Ill cell lines. 24 By
`downregulating uPA, glucocorticoids may inhibit
`the growth and invasiveness of prostate cancer
`cells.
`
`lNTERLEUKIN-6
`Recently, Nishimura et al. 27 showed that dexa(cid:173)
`methasone had growth inhibitory effects on the
`DU-145 AIPC human cell line. These inhibitory
`effects were associated with a dose-dependent up(cid:173)
`regulation of inhibitor of kappa B (IKBa) a key
`inhibitor of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-KB). A
`subcellular localization evaluation of DU-145 cells
`pretreated with dexamethasone confirmed the loss
`of NF-KB nuclear localization. NF-KB is an impor(cid:173)
`tant regulator of several cytokines, including IL-
`6.28 lt is believed that loss of nuclear compartmen(cid:173)
`talization of NF-KB leads to inhibition of IL-6
`secretion, thus leading to a favorable growth inhib(cid:173)
`itory effect. Consistent with this hypothesis is the
`inhibition of DU-145 cell growth by IL-6 antibod(cid:173)
`ies, as well as the fourfold decrease in IL-6 levels in
`patients treated with low-dose dexamethasone. 27
`
`SUPPRESSION OF ANDROGEN-DEPENDENT
`TRANSCRIPTION
`
`Androgen and glucocorticoid receptors share a
`significant degree of homology, especially in their
`DNA-binding domain (DBD). Both receptors bind
`through their DBD to a common DNA site termed
`the hormone receptor element. AR, GR, and MR
`(mineralocorticoid receptors) bind to hormone re(cid:173)
`ceptor element as homodimers. Although these re(cid:173)
`ceptors bind to the same DNA site, they result in
`different transcriptional activities. Factors other
`than DBD-hormone receptor element interaction
`determine the specificity of the transcriptional ac(cid:173)
`tivity. Chen et al. 29 has recently demonstrated that
`GR and AR can associate through their DBD to
`form a heterodimer. This heterodimer formation
`results in an inhibitory effect on androgen-specific
`transcription in vitro. This transcriptional inhibi(cid:173)
`tion can lead to inhibition of the necessary down(cid:173)
`stream events for the growth of prostate cancer
`cells. These results should be extrapolated with
`caution, because it has not been shown yet that GR
`and AR form heterodimers in vivo.
`
`GLUCOCORTICOID-DRIVEN CELLULAR
`PROLIFERATION
`
`Although the data discussed above point to an
`inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on prostate
`cancer cell lines, a stimulatory effect has been also
`documented. Zhao et al. 30 described two cell lines
`(MDA PCa 2a and 2b) derived from bony metasta(cid:173)
`ses of a patient with progressing prostate cancer
`despite hormonal therapy. These cells carry a mu(cid:173)
`tated AR (L701H and T877 A) that has a high affin(cid:173)
`ity to cortisol and cortisone. Both cortisol and cor(cid:173)
`tisone resulted in enhanced cellular prolif era ti on
`and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) secretion in
`these two cell lines.3° Chang et al. 31 studied the
`
`554
`
`UROLOGY 60 (4), 2002
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000076
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 2
`
`

`
`effects of various endogenous and synthetic glu(cid:173)
`cocorticoids on LNCaP prostate cancer cell line
`(AR T877 A mutant) growth and PSA secretion.
`Both 11-deoxycorticosterone (DOC) and dexa(cid:173)
`methasone stimulated the AR-dependent PSA se(cid:173)
`cretion. Furthermore, DOC was able to stimulate
`cellular growth at physiologically achievable lev(cid:173)
`els, and dexamethasone seemed to have only a
`modest agonistic effect. These effects were medi(cid:173)
`ated through the mutated T877 A AR.
`
`CLINICAL UTILITY OF GLUCOCORTICOIDS
`IN AIPC
`
`Despite the limited preclinical data regarding the
`mechanism of their inhibitory effects on prostate
`cancer cell growth, glucocorticoids are used exten(cid:173)
`siveli in the treatment of AIPC. Miller and Hin(cid:173)
`man 2 were the first to report on the clinical activ(cid:173)
`ity of glucocorticoids in AIPC. Ten patients with
`advanced prostate cancer who had progressed de(cid:173)
`spite prior orchiectomy and estrogen therapy were
`treated with cortisone 50 to 200 mg/day. Subjective
`symptomatic improvements were noted in 8 of IO
`patients.32 Since this initial publication, multiple
`studies have evaluated single-agent glucocorti(cid:173)
`coids in the treatment of AIPC. These studies have
`ranged from retrospective analyses to Phase Ill tri(cid:173)
`als.
`
`RETROSPECTIVE AND PHASE II TRIALS
`Phase II and retrospective studies before 1995
`did not use PSA as a marker of disease activity
`and relied on subjective response criteria
`33 ·34 Tannock et al. 11 evaluated retro(cid:173)
`(Table I). 11
`•
`spectively in 28 patients and prospectively in 3 7
`patients, the palliative effects of daily prednisone
`7.5 to IO mg. All enrolled patients had symptom(cid:173)
`atic bony metastases with evidence of disease pro(cid:173)
`gression despite orchiectomy and/or estrogen ther(cid:173)
`apy. Of 28 patients analyzed retrospectively, 7 had
`improvement in pain and reduced requirements
`for analgesics lasting a median of 5 months. In 3 7
`patients evaluated prospectively, 14 patients
`(38%) had improvements in pain and a leveling or
`a decrease in their analgesic requirements for at
`least I month. The reduction in pain was associ(cid:173)
`ated with improvements in quality of life ( QOL).
`The clinical benefits lasted 3 to 30 months in 7
`patients. Alkaline phosphatase and acid phospha(cid:173)
`tase were evaluated in this study but did not show
`any evidence of correlation with clinical response.
`Patel et al. 34 treated patients with prostate cancer
`and measurable disease that had progressed de(cid:173)
`spite orchiectomy or estrogen therapy with low(cid:173)
`dose dexamethasone. Fifty-eight patients were
`randomized to receive either megestrol acetate or
`dexamethasone 0.75 mg daily. The study had com-
`
`plex response criteria that involved evaluations of
`multiple variables (bone scan, computed tomogra(cid:173)
`phy, chest radiography, pain evaluation, acid phos(cid:173)
`phatase, weight, performance status, alkaline
`phosphatase, and hemoglobin). Two of 29 patients
`on the dexamethasone arm had evidence of disease
`regression each lasting 359 and 512 days. Twenty(cid:173)
`one patients had stable disease at a median of 86
`days. The median survival on the dexamethasone
`arm was 246 days.
`Studies conducted since 1995 used PSA as a
`marker for response (Table I). PSA is not a perfect
`response endpoint, but it is agreed as an indicator
`of biologic activity.35'36 The Prostate-Specific An(cid:173)
`tigen Working Group has developed guidelines for
`using PSA as a measurement of outcome. Only a
`PSA decrease of more than 50% with a sustained
`decrease for 4 weeks is considered a PSA re(cid:173)
`sponse.36 Such a decrease has been associated with
`an extension in overall survival in several stud(cid:173)
`ies.37,38
`Storlie et al. 39 retrospectively evaluated 38 pa(cid:173)
`tients who had progressive disease despite orchiec(cid:173)
`tomy and were treated with 0.75 mg dexametha(cid:173)
`sone two or three times a day. They reported a 63%
`subjective symptomatic improvement and a 79%
`PSA decrease of more than 50%. The median time
`to biochemical progression in responders (PSA in(cid:173)
`creases of greater than 50%) was 245 days (range
`99 to 660). Thirty-five percent of PSA responders
`had some evidence of bony disease regression and
`none of the nonresponders did. The study included
`only patients who had adequate follow-up. Thus,
`the study has potentially excluded nonresponders
`with early dropout because of disease progres(cid:173)
`sion.39
`Kelly et al. 40 conducted a Phase II trial in which
`30 patients with AIPC were treated with hydrocor(cid:173)
`tisone 40 mg/day. Suramin was added to the treat(cid:173)
`ment regimen at the time of PSA progression. All
`patients must have had evidence of disease pro(cid:173)
`gression and documented castrate testosterone lev(cid:173)
`els before entry on study. Patients who were taking
`flutamide had to have the drug discontinued; they
`were entered on trial only if they showed disease
`progression after flutamide withdrawal. Six pa(cid:173)
`tients (20%) had a decrease in PSA of more than
`50% and the median duration of the decline was 16
`weeks. One patient had a PSA decline of 99% last(cid:173)
`ing more than 52 weeks and I patient had PSA and
`bone scan stabilization lasting more than 44 weeks.
`Sartor37 retrospectively reviewed the results of
`29 consecutive patients with AIPC treated with
`prednisone IO mg twice daily. All patients had to
`have a rising PSA despite adequate androgen abla(cid:173)
`tion to be entered in the trial. Flutamide with(cid:173)
`drawal was ruled out as a possible confounding
`variable in all assessable patients. Ten (34%) of 29
`
`UROLOGY 60 (4), 2002
`
`555
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000077
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 3
`
`

`
`TABLE I. Phase II and retrospective studies evaluating glucocorticoids in the treatment of progressive hormone-resistant prostate cancer
`Patients (n) and
`Quality of Life and
`Objective Responses and
`MST and TIP
`(mo)
`Treatment
`Post-Therapy PSA Decline
`Subjective Responses
`37; prednisone 7.5-10
`NA
`38% had improvement
`mg
`in pain score at 1 mo;
`19% had sustained
`improvement in pain
`for 3-30 mo
`
`Entry Criteria
`Failed orchiectomy and/or
`estrogen therapy
`
`Study
`Tannock et al., 11
`1989, prospective
`study
`
`Patel et a/., 34 1990,
`prospective study
`
`29; dexamethasone
`0.75 mg BID
`
`Nishiyama,41 1998,
`prospective study
`
`7; low-dose
`dexamethasone 1 .5-
`0.5 mg/day
`
`Sartor, 37 1998,
`retrospective study
`Storlie et a/., 39 1995,
`retrospective study
`
`Kelly et a/., 40 1995,
`prospective study
`
`Weitzman et a/.,42
`2000, prospective
`study
`Nishimura et a/.,43
`2000, prospective
`study
`
`29; prednisone 10 mg
`BID
`38; low-dose
`dexamethasone 0.75
`BID/TID
`30; hydrocortisone 25
`mg 0AM and 1 5 mg
`0PM
`12; dexamethasone 20
`mg PO 06 x 3 03
`wk
`37; dexamethasone
`0.5-2 mg OD
`
`Failed orchiectomy or
`diethyl-stilbestrol
`therapy
`Patients with orchiectomy
`or LHRH therapy with
`progression after
`secondary hormonal
`therapy withdrawal
`Failed orchiectomy or
`LHRH agonist
`Failed orchiectomy;
`progressive disease
`
`Progressive AIPC
`
`Progressive AIPC
`
`Progressive AIPC
`
`2/29 objective responses
`(decrease in measurable
`disease)
`417 (PSA decrease of >90%)
`after 3 mo of therapy
`
`MST 6.7
`
`TIP 3-11
`
`MST 12.8; median
`TIP 2
`
`63% had symptomatic
`improvement
`
`34% (PSA decrease of
`>50%)
`PSA response: 79% had a
`PSA decrease >50% (not
`confirmed at 4 wk)
`20% (PSA decrease of
`>50%); 1 Pt had >99%
`PSA decrease
`0% PSA response
`
`62% PSA response (>50%
`decrease confirmed in 4
`wk)
`
`MTP 9
`
`11 /18 had improvement
`in pain
`
`KEY: PSA = prostate-specific antigen; MST = mean survival time; TTP = time to progression; NA = not available; BID = twice daily; LHRH = luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; TID = three times daily; Q = every; Pt = patient; PO = orally;
`AIPC = androgen-independent prostate cancer; QD = every day; MTP = median time to progression.
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000078
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 4
`
`

`
`patients achieved a PSA decline of more than 50%.
`Patients who had more than a 50% decline in their
`PSA level had a median survival time (MST) of 17. 4
`months compared with 12.8 months in the overall
`patient population. The median progression-free
`survival was 2 months; however, 14% had a pro(cid:173)
`gression-free survival of more than 6 months. Al(cid:173)
`though the PSA response rate of 34% was higher
`than what has been reported with a daily 10-mg
`prednisone regimen, the retrospective nature of
`the study and the small number of patients limited
`result interpretation. The results of the study, how(cid:173)
`ever, suggest an association between a decline of
`more than 50% in PSA and prolonged survival.
`Nishiyama41 evaluated in a small prospective
`study 16 patients with bony metastases in whom
`hormonal therapy had failed. All patients had been
`treated with orchiectomy or a luteinizing hor(cid:173)
`mone-releasing hormone analogue in combination
`with chlormadinone acetate, estramustine, or flut(cid:173)
`amide. Patients underwent hormonal withdrawal
`before study entry. Seven patients progressed de(cid:173)
`spite hormonal withdrawal and were treated with
`dexamethasone 1.5 mg daily. Three of these pa(cid:173)
`tients had a PSA response of more than 50%, and
`all responses lasted more than 6 months.
`Weitzman et al. 42 evaluated a high-dose inter(cid:173)
`mittent schedule of dexamethasone in patients
`with progressive prostate cancer despite androgen
`ablation. Twelve patients were treated with 20 mg
`dexamethasone every 6 hours for three doses re(cid:173)
`peated every 3 weeks. None of the patients had a
`decrease in PSA of more than 50%. Although the
`number of patients was small, these data suggest a
`lack of efficacy of an intermittent schedule using
`glucocorticoids.
`Most recently, Nishimura et al. 43 evaluated, in a
`prospective trial, the use of low-dose dexametha(cid:173)
`sone in AIPC. Thirty-seven patients with a rising
`PSA and castrate testosterone levels were treated
`with daily dexamethasone 0.5 to 2 mg. Forty-nine
`of these patients had symptomatic metastases on
`entry. The median pretreatment PSA was 38 ng/mL
`(range 2.4 to 3570). Antiandrogens were discon(cid:173)
`tinued at least 4 weeks before initiation of dexa(cid:173)
`methasone. Twenty-three patients (62%) had a
`PSA decline of more than 50% that was sustained
`for more than 4 weeks. Four of the responders had
`decreasing PSA after antiandrogen withdrawal and
`before the start of dexamethasone. The median
`time to PSA progression in the responders was 9
`months. The MST in the PSA responders was 22
`months versus 8 months in the nonresponders.
`The favorable results seen in this trial were, at least
`partially, influenced by the responses to antiandro(cid:173)
`gen withdrawal and perhaps the relatively low vol(cid:173)
`ume of systemic disease.
`
`PHASE III TRIALS
`Glucocorticoids have served as the control arm
`in several Phase Ill trials of cytotoxic or hormonal
`therapies (Table II). Tannock et al. 44 randomized
`161 symptomatic patients with AIPC to mitox(cid:173)
`antrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone at 10
`mg/day and evaluated QOL as an endpoint. They
`described a 12% palliative response in patients re(cid:173)
`ceiving single-agent prednisone. The PSA level de(cid:173)
`creased by more than 50% in 22% of patients, but
`these responses were not reconfirmed in 4 weeks.
`Osoba et al. 45 analyzed this same patient popula(cid:173)
`tion for health-related QOL. 45 Patients receiving
`prednisone had a significant improvement in
`health-related QOL scores at 6 weeks. This statis(cid:173)
`tical significance was lost at 12 weeks of therapy.
`Kantoff et al. 38 randomized 242 patients with
`AIPC to mitoxantrone plus hydrocortisone or hy(cid:173)
`drocortisone 45 mg daily and evaluated the sur(cid:173)
`vival and response rates as endpoints. The MST in
`the hydrocortisone arm was 12.6 months, and the
`median time
`to progression (MTP) was 2.3
`months. Twenty-two percent of patients had a
`maximal PSA decrease of more than 50%. Patients
`who had a maximal decrease in PSA responses of
`more than 50% had a significantly higher MST
`(20.5 versus 10.3 months). This study did not
`show a statistically significant difference between
`the two arms in survival or quality-of-life (QOL)
`measures.
`Gregurich46 randomized 120 asymptomatic pa(cid:173)
`tients with progressive hormone-resistant prostate
`cancer to mitoxantrone plus prednisone or pred(cid:173)
`nisone 5 mg twice daily. A PSA decrease of more
`than 50% occurred in 24% of patients on the pred(cid:173)
`nisone arm. The MTP in the prednisone arm was
`3.8 months, significantly lower than in the combi(cid:173)
`nation arm. The overall survival was equivalent in
`both arms.
`Small et al. 47 randomized 460 patients with
`symptomatic, metastatic AIPC
`to
`low-dose
`suramin plus hydrocortisone or hydrocortisone 40
`mg daily. The primary endpoint of the trial was the
`evaluation of pain and analgesic use as primary
`indicators of response. Twenty-eight percent of pa(cid:173)
`tients receiving single-agent hydrocortisone had a
`pain response and 8% had both a pain response and
`a decrease in opioid analgesic use. The PSA level
`decreased by more than 50% in 16% of patients
`receiving single-a}ent prednisone, and the MST
`was 9.2 months. 4
`Fossa et al. 48 randomized 201 patients with
`symptomatic AIPC to receive prednisone 5 mg four
`times a day or flutamide 250 mg 3 times a day. The
`subjective response was assessed on the basis of the
`performance status, reduction in analgesic use, and
`reduction of the pain score (World Health Organi(cid:173)
`zation criteria). At 6 weeks of therapy, the subjec-
`
`UROLOGY 60 (4), 2002
`
`557
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000079
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 5
`
`

`
`Phase Ill Trials
`Tannock et a/., 44 1996
`Osobay et a/., 45
`1999
`
`Patients in GC arm
`(n) and Treatment
`
`81; prednisone 5 mg
`BID
`
`TABLE II. Phase Ill trials with glucocorticoids as control arm
`Objective Responses
`and Post-Therapy
`PSA Decline
`22% (PSA decrease of
`>50%)-not
`reconfirmed in 4 wk
`
`Entry Criteria
`Symptomatic, metastatic
`disease, progressing
`despite standard
`hormonal therapy
`
`MST and Median
`TIP (mo)
`
`MST 11
`
`Kantoff et a/., 38 1999
`(hydrocortisone and
`mitoxantrone +
`hydrocortisone)
`
`123; hydrocortisone
`30 mg 0AM, 1 5 mg
`0PM
`
`Progressive, metastatic
`disease despite
`orchiectomy or LHRH
`analogue therapy
`
`Gregurich, 46 2000
`(prednisone and
`mitoxantrone +
`prednisone)
`
`Small et a/., 47 2000
`(hydrocortisone and
`suramin +
`hydrocortisone)
`Fossa et a/., 48 2001
`(prednisone and
`flutamide)
`
`60; prednisone 5 mg
`BID
`
`231; hydrocortisone
`40 mg daily
`
`101; prednisone 5
`mg QID
`
`Asymptomatic
`metastatic HRPC with
`progressive disease
`despite standard
`hormonal therapy
`Symptomatic, metastatic
`disease, progressing
`despite standard
`hormonal therapy
`Symptomatic metastatic
`disease with
`progression despite
`orchiectomy or LHRH
`analogues
`
`21.5% (PSA decrease
`of >50%); PR 4%
`(PR based on PSA
`necessitates a
`decrease in PSA of
`>80% lasting 6 wk
`24% (PSA decrease
`>50%)
`
`MST 12.6; median TIP
`2.3
`
`Median TIP 3.8
`
`16% (PSA decrease
`>50% lasting 4 wk)
`
`MST 9.2
`
`21 % PSA decrease
`>50%
`
`Median TIP 3.4; OS 10.6
`
`KEY: GC ~ glucocorticosteroids; HQL ~ health-related quality of life; PR ~ partial response; HRPC ~ hormone-refractory prostate cancer; OS ~ overall survival; QOL ~ quality of life; other abbreviations as in Table I.
`
`Quality of Life and
`Subjective Responses
`12.3% had a palliative
`response; HQL improved
`at 6 wk of therapy
`compared with initial time
`of recruitment; statistical
`significance lost at 12 wk
`
`28% pain response based on
`decrease in pain level or
`analgesic use
`
`56% had a subjective
`response (physician
`assessed: decrease in pain
`and improved general
`condition); QOL scores
`favored prednisone arm
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000080
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 6
`
`

`
`rive response rate was 49% in the prednisone
`group. Subjective responses lasted for a median of
`4.8 months. Twenty-one percent of patients in the
`prednisone arm had a decrease in PSA of more than
`50%. In 9% of patients receiving prednisone, a PSA
`decline of more than 50% lasted more than 4
`weeks. A PSA decline was associated with a subjec(cid:173)
`tive response. A PSA decline of more than 50% was
`associated with a favorable survival outcome. The
`MTP and MST for the prednisone arm was 3.4 and
`10.6 months, respectively.
`
`COMMENT
`
`We conclude that glucocorticoids have an inhib(cid:173)
`itory effect on AIPC in vitro and in vivo. Cell
`growth inhibition is linked to several potential
`mechanisms: downregulation of adrenal andro(cid:173)
`gens, modulation of cellular growth factors, and
`downregulation of AR-dependent transcription.
`Other, nongenomic pathways of glucocorticoids
`have recently been described, especially in the ner(cid:173)
`vous system. The role of such pathways in prostate
`cancer antitumor activity has not yet been delin(cid:173)
`eated. Thus, a full understanding of the mecha(cid:173)
`nism of activity or resistance to glucocorticoids is
`far from complete.
`In total, the laboratory data show a heteroge(cid:173)
`neous effect of glucocorticoids on prostate cancer.
`This heterogeneous effect reflects the interplay of
`two main variables: glucocorticoids and tumor bi(cid:173)
`ology. Glucocorticoid activity varies depending on
`the chemical agent used, as well as on its dosage.
`The stimulatory effects of DOC compared with the
`neutral effect of dexamethasone on LNCaP exem(cid:173)
`plify class-dependent activity. 31 A dose-dependent
`response is manifested in the inhibitory effects of
`dexamethasone on the DU 145 cell line in which
`increasing activity is seen at concentrations be(cid:173)
`tween I0-9M and I0- 7M. 27 Glucocorticoid activ(cid:173)
`ity is also dependent on tumor biology such as GR
`expression or the presence of AR mutations. Dexa(cid:173)
`methasone inhibitory activity is lacking in GR-neg(cid:173)
`ative LNCaP cells, but it is clearly present in GR(cid:173)
`expressing cells such as PC-3 and DU-145. 27 AR
`mutations such as the combined mutation L70IH/
`T877 A or T877 A have been associated with a par(cid:173)
`adoxical stimulatory response to glucocorticoids,
`and the wild-type AR has not been shown to pro(cid:173)
`duce such effects. Limited data are available on GR
`expression in human prostate cancer tissue. One
`study of 20 patients with localized prostate adeno(cid:173)
`carcinoma reported minimal GR staining in neo(cid:173)
`plastic epithelial cells. 49 More recently, Nishimura
`et al. 27 reported intense nuclear GR staining in 8 of
`16 patients with localized prostate cancer. To our
`knowledge, GR expression in AIPC samples has
`not been evaluated.
`
`The clinical data clearly indicate that glucocorti(cid:173)
`coids have an overall palliative effect in the treat(cid:173)
`ment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer when
`used on a daily basis. On the basis of data collected
`in Phase Ill trials, a PSA decrease of more than 50%
`in 16% to 20% of patients, a MTP of 2.3 to 3.4
`months, and a MST ranging between 9.2 and 12.6
`months are to be expected. The reported greater
`than 50% decrease in most of the studies listed
`does not constitute a partial response by the Pros(cid:173)
`tate-Specific Antigen Working Group criteria be(cid:173)
`cause of the lack of a 4-week confirmation of re(cid:173)
`sponse. However, patients with a PSA decrease of
`greater than 50% had a longer lasting palliative
`effect and survival advantage than did non-PSA re(cid:173)
`sponders. The QOL is improved, but the improve(cid:173)
`ment is often limited to the first 6 weeks of therapy.
`Phase II and retrospective studies using low-dose
`dexamethasone have reported higher response
`rates.
`None of the randomized studies so far has shown
`a survival advantage of any combination therapy
`over glucocorticoids; however, the combination of
`mitoxantrone and prednisone or hydrocortisone
`seems to provide better palliation and an improved
`MTP and QOL. When randomized against the an(cid:173)
`tiandrogen flutamide, prednisone resulted in a
`similar median survival but was associated with
`improved subjective responses and QOL. This fur(cid:173)
`ther supports the use of glucocorticoids in the pal(cid:173)
`liative setting or on failure of primary chemother(cid:173)
`apy in AIPC.
`Although the clinical activity of glucocorticoids
`has been consistently reproduced, the benefits
`have been usually limited to a small subgroup of
`the target patient population. Careful study to de(cid:173)
`termine the factors associated with clinical benefit
`in AIPC should be done. Do these responders have
`specific patterns of adrenal androgen production?
`Do specific AR mutations correlate with a pro(cid:173)
`longed response to glucocorticoids? ls the re(cid:173)
`sponse dependent on GR expression or overex(cid:173)
`pression? Such efforts should identify the most
`active class and dose to be used, and most impor(cid:173)
`tantly, in which patients. Until then, the optimal
`dose and schedule of glucocorticoids in AIPC will
`remain a subject of debate. Future progress in the
`use of glucocorticoids in AIPC can only happen by
`achieving a better understanding of the molecular
`pathology of this disease.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Riccardi C, Zollo 0, Nocentini G, et al: Glucocorticoid
`hormones in the regulation of cell death. Therapie 55: 165-
`169, 2000.
`2. Smets LA, Salomons G, and van den Berg]: Glucocor(cid:173)
`ticoid induced apoptosis in leukemia. Adv Exp Med Biol 457:
`607-614, 1999.
`
`UROLOGY 60 (4), 2002
`
`559
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000081
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1079 PAGE 7
`
`

`
`3. Miyoshi H, Ohki M, Nakagawa T, et al: Glucocorticoids
`induce apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines with a
`t(8;21) chromosome translocation. Leuk Res 21: 45-50, 1997.
`4. Arai Y, Nakamura Y, Inoue F, et al: Glucocorticoid(cid:173)
`induced apoptotic pathways in eosinophils: comparison with
`glucocorticoid-sensitive leukemia cells. Int] Hematol 7: 340-
`349, 2000.
`5. Mann C, Hughes F, and Cidlowski J: Delineation of
`signaling pathways involved in glucocorticoid induced and
`spontaneous apoptosis of rat thymocytes. Endocrinology 141:
`528-538, 2000.
`6. Carollo M, Parente L, and D'Alessandro N: Dexameth(cid:173)
`asone induced cytotoxic activity and drug resistance effects in
`androgen-independent prostate tumor PC-3 cells are medi(cid:173)
`a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket