throbber
Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` --------------------------------------
`
` MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC,
`
` Petitioner,
`
` v.
`
` JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC.,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
` Case No. IPR2016-01332
`
` U.S. Patent No. 8,822,438
`
` --------------------------------
`
` WOCKHARDT BIO AG,
`
` Petitioner,
`
` v.
`
` JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC.,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
` Case IPR2016-01582
`
`15
`
` U.S. Patent No. 8.822,438 B2
`
` --------------------------------
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MATTHEW
`
` B. RETTIG, M.D., a Witness herein, taken
`
` by Petitioners, at the offices of Sidley
`
` Austin, 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New
`
` York, on Friday, March 31, 2017, at 9:08
`
` a.m., before DEBRA STEVENS, Certified
`
` Realtime and Registered Professional
`
` Reporter and Notary Public within and for
`
` the State of New York.
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`
` E X A M I N A T I O N S
`
` Witness Page
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`4
`
` M. Rettig
`5 By Mr. White 8
` By Ms. Donovan 95
`6 By Mr. Gallo 99
`
`7 8 9
`
` E X H I B I T S
`10 Mylan
` Exhibit Description Page
`
` Exh 1085 Potter article 37
`
` Exh 1086 Attard 2012 article 41
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`14
`15
`
` Wockhardt
`16 Exhibit Description Page
`17 Exh 1082 Montgomery,Eisenberger, 128
` Rettig article, 2016
`
`18
`
`19
`
` Exh 1083 Nishimura article 141
`
` Exh 1084 Rettig declaration in 152
`20 Amerigen
`21 Exh 1085 Rettig declaration in 152
` Mylan
`
`22
`
` Exh 1086 Garnick declaration in 153
`23 Mylan
`24
`
` (Continued)
`
` E X H I B I T S (Continued)
`
` PRIOR MARKED AND REFERENCED HEREIN
`
`Page 5
`
` Mylan 1001 '438 Patent
`
` Mylan 1005 '213 Patent
`
` Mylan 1023 Attard 2005 article
`
` Mylan 1003 O'Donnell article
`
` Janssen 2014 Attard 2008 article
`
` Janssen 2133 Ryan article
`
` WCK 1035 Potter article
`
` WCK 1036 Fakih article
`
` WCK 1005 O'Donnell article
`
` WCK 1002 Godley declaration
`
`25
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 3
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S :
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
` PERKINS COIE LLP
` Attorneys for Petitioner Mylan
`5 Pharmaceuticals Inc.
` 700 Thirteenth Street, N.W., Suite 600
`6 Washington, DC 20005-3960
`7 BY: BRANDON M. WHITE, ESQ.
` bmwhite@perkinscoie.com
`
`8
`
` MARIE STUBBINGS, ESQ.
`9 mstubbings@perkinscoie.com
`10
`11
`
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C
`12 Attorneys for Petitioner
` Wockhardt Bio AG
`13 1100 New York Ave. NW, Suite 600
` Washington DC 20005
`
`14
`
` BY: CHRISTOPHER M. GALLO, ESQ.
`15 cgallo@skgf.com
`16 DENNIES VARUGHESE, ESQ.
` dvarughe@skgf.com
`
`17
`18
`19 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
` Attorneys for Patent Owner Mylan
`20 Pharmaceuticals Inc.
` 787 Seventh Avenue
`21 New York, New York 10019
`22 BY: BINDU DONOVAN, ESQ.
` bdonovan@sidley.com
`
`23
`
` ALYSSA B. MONSEN, ESQ.
`24 amonsen@sidley.com
`25
`
` (Continued)
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`1 2
`
`3
`
` FINNEGAN EUROPE LLP
`4 Attorneys for Patent Owner BTG
` 16 Old Bailey
`5 London EC4M 7EG
` United Kingdom
`
`6
`
` BY: ANTHONY C. TRIDICO, ESQ.
`7 anthony.tridico@finnegan.com
`
` ALSO PRESENT:
`
` Tony Dolan, BTG
`
`8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`12 * * *
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`2 (Pages 2 - 5)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`1 2
`
` MR. DOLAN: Tony Dolan, BTG.
`3 VIDEOGRAPHER: Our court
`4 reporter, Deb Stevens, also from
`5 Veritext, will now swear in the
`6 witness and we can proceed.
`7 Whereupon,
`8 M A T T H E W R E T T I G,
`9 having been first duly sworn/affirmed,
`10 was examined and testified as follows:
`11 EXAMINATION BY
`12 MR. WHITE:
`13 Q. Good morning, Doctor.
`14 A. Morning.
`15 Q. My name is Brandon White and I
`16 am here on behalf of Mylan to ask you some
`17 questions today.
`18 Would you state your name for
`19 the record?
`20 A. Matthew Rettig.
`21 Q. Where are you currently
`22 employed?
`23 A. I am currently employed at the
`24 UCLA School of Medicine and Department of
`25 Veterans Affairs of West Los Angeles.
`
`1 2
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the
`3 beginning of file number one. We are
`4 going on the record at approximately
`5 9:08 a.m. My name is Kevin Gallagher,
`6 representing Veritext, New York. The
`7 date today is the 31st of March, 2017.
`8 The deposition is being held at Sidley
`9 Austin, located at 787 Seventh Avenue,
`10 New York, New York.
`11 The caption of the case is Mylan
`12 Pharmaceuticals vs. Janssen Oncology,
`13 Inc. and also Wockhardt et al. vs.
`14 Janssen Oncology Inc. The case is
`15 filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark
`16 Office, Case Number IPR2016-01332.
`17 The name of our witness this morning
`18 is Matthew Rettig.
`19 At this time attorneys present
`20 in the room will identify themselves
`21 for the record.
`22 (Brief interruption)
`23 VIDEOGRAPHER: Off the record at
`24 9:09 a.m.
`25 (Recess.)
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 9
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 Q. You are the same Dr. Rettig who
`3 submitted declarations and was deposed in
`4 the Amerigen IPR a few months ago?
`5 A. Yes.
`6 Q. You have before you the
`7 declaration that you submitted in response
`8 to the Mylan papers. Is that right?
`9 A. Yes.
`10 Q. If I just refer to that as your
`11 Mylan declaration, will you know what I am
`12 referring to?
`13 A. Yes.
`14 MS. DONOVAN: I would like to
`15 state for the record that it is
`16 Janssen's position that Petitioner's
`17 examination of Dr. Rettig will be
`18 limited to the scope of the
`19 declaration that he has submitted in
`20 the Mylan IPR.
`21 MR. WHITE: I understand your
`22 position and you can object to our
`23 questions if you believe they are
`24 outside the scope. We take no
`25 position on your statement.
`
`1 2
`
` VIDEOGRAPHER: We are going back
`3 on the record approximately 9:10 a.m.
`4 This is the beginning of File B.
`5 MR. WHITE: This is Brandon
`6 White from Perkins Coie, on behalf of
`7 Petitioner Mylan.
`8 MS. STUBBINGS: Marie Stubbings,
`9 also from Perkins Coie, on behalf of
`10 Petitioner Mylan.
`11 MR. GALLO: Christopher Gallo
`12 from Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox,
`13 on behalf of Petitioner Wockhardt.
`14 MR. VARUGHESE: Dennies
`15 Varughese, Sterne Kessler Goldstein
`16 Fox, on behalf of Petitioner
`17 Wockhardt.
`18 MS. DONOVAN: Bindu Donovan on
`19 behalf of Patent Owner Janssen
`20 Oncology Inc.
`21 MS. MONSEN: Alyssa Monsen, on
`22 behalf of Patent Owner Janssen
`23 Oncology Inc.
`24 MR. TRIDICO: Anthony Tridico on
`25 behalf of Patent Owner BTG.
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`3 (Pages 6 - 9)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 10
`
`Page 12
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 Q. I just want to go over the rules
`3 so we are on the same page for the
`4 deposition. I am sure you have probably
`5 heard these before.
`6 I will ask you ask you some
`7 questions. After I ask my question,
`8 Ms. Donovan may object. Unless she
`9 instructs you not to, you should try to
`10 answer my question if you can.
`11 We should try not to talk over
`12 each other for the reporter's sake. You
`13 should give your attorney time to object,
`14 again for the court reporter's sake. If I
`15 cut you off, it is inadvertent. Please
`16 tell me, and I will happily let you finish
`17 your answer. Again, I ask that you let me
`18 finish my question. Sometimes we can get
`19 conversational and you think you know
`20 where I am going with a question and start
`21 answering. It can make for a difficult
`22 record.
`23 If there is something I ask you
`24 that you don't understand or you need to
`25 see something, please let me know and I
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 MR. WHITE: Can we stipulate
`3 that the witness is here in response
`4 to our deposition notices filed in the
`5 IPR's?
`6 MS. DONOVAN: That's fine.
`7 Q. What did you do to prepare for
`8 your deposition today?
`9 A. I communicated with counsel and
`10 collaborated on the generation of my
`11 declaration.
`12 Q. Other than your meetings with
`13 counsel, did you speak to anyone else?
`14 A. No.
`15 Q. At any time have you spoken with
`16 any of the other witnesses for Janssen?
`17 A. No.
`18 Q. Did you ever speak with
`19 Dr. Vellteuro?
`20 A. No.
`21 Q. Did you review any materials to
`22 prepare for your deposition today?
`23 A. Yes.
`24 Q. What did you review?
`25 MS. DONOVAN: I will caution the
`
`Page 11
`
`Page 13
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 will try to clarify the question or
`3 provide you materials to the extent I can.
`4 Understood?
`5 And you should try to give
`6 verbal answers and not head nods or other
`7 gesturing. The court reporter can't take
`8 that down.
`9 MS. DONOVAN: Before we continue
`10 further --
`11 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Off the
`12 record at 9:14 a.m.
`13 (Pause.)
`14 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Back on the
`15 record at approximately 9:15 a.m.,
`16 beginning of file C.
`17 BY MR. WHITE:
`18 Q. As we finish up the rules, if at
`19 any time you need a break, feel free to
`20 let me know and I am happy to take a
`21 break.
`22 Do you believe there is any
`23 reason you can't give honest and truthful
`24 testimony today?
`25 A. No.
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 witness, you may respond generally
`3 without disclosing the specifics of
`4 attorney-client privileged
`5 communications.
`6 A. I reviewed many of the exhibits
`7 related to this case.
`8 Q. Those are the materials that you
`9 cited in your declaration?
`10 A. Correct.
`11 Q. Did you review anything that you
`12 hadn't included in your declaration?
`13 MS. DONOVAN: You may answer
`14 that "yes" or "no."
`15 A. Not that I recall.
`16 Q. How much time did you spend in
`17 preparing the Mylan declaration?
`18 A. I don't have the exact number of
`19 hours, but many hours.
`20 Q. And that is many hours that were
`21 spent unique to the Mylan declaration and
`22 not as part of your work with the Amerigen
`23 case?
`24 A. Correct.
`25 Q. Do you have an understanding of
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`4 (Pages 10 - 13)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 14
`
`Page 16
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 what this dispute is about?
`3 A. Yes.
`4 Q. You understand you are here to
`5 talk about your opinions with respect to
`6 the '438 patent?
`7 A. Yes.
`8 Q. You understand what the '438
`9 patent is?
`10 A. Yes.
`11 Q. Other than your deposition in
`12 the Amerigen case, have you been deposed
`13 before?
`14 A. No.
`15 Q. Have you served as an expert
`16 witness other than in the Amerigen case?
`17 MS. DONOVAN: Objection to form.
`18 A. Can you clarify the specifics of
`19 what you mean by "expert witness"?
`20 Q. Sure. Other than with respect
`21 to your declarations with respect to the
`22 '438 patent that are in the Amerigen,
`23 Wockhardt and Mylan cases, have you been
`24 an expert witness in any litigations?
`25 A. So, I have been retained as an
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 A. No.
`3 Q. Did you have any involvement
`4 with the development of abiraterone
`5 acetate?
`6 MS. DONOVAN: Object to the form
`7 of the question as vague.
`8 A. So, can you please specify what
`9 you mean by "development of abiraterone
`10 acetate"?
`11 Q. Prior to the FDA approval of
`12 abiraterone acetate did you have any
`13 involvement with abiraterone acetate?
`14 A. Yes. I did serve as an
`15 investigator in the clinical trials that
`16 led up to the approval of abiraterone
`17 acetate.
`18 Q. Which clinical trials were you
`19 involved with?
`20 A. So, the Phase III studies, both
`21 the -- as I recall, both the
`22 post-chemotherapy and pre-chemotherapy
`23 studies. I may have been a
`24 subinvestigator on one of the earlier
`25 phase studies, but I can't recall.
`
`Page 15
`
`Page 17
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 expert witness but was never deposed, and
`3 the cases were settled prior to my direct
`4 involvement.
`5 MS. DONOVAN: Let me just state
`6 for the record, we have disclosed
`7 Dr. Rettig under the protective order
`8 in the District Court litigation
`9 related to the '438 patent. So you
`10 may want to just clarify your
`11 question.
`12 Q. I understand you have been
`13 disclosed with respect to the '438 patent,
`14 so nothing with respect to the '438
`15 patent.
`16 Was that -- the other case that
`17 you referenced, was that public? Was your
`18 disclosure public?
`19 A. They were not just one case, but
`20 I don't know the disclosure status of
`21 those cases. They were tort claims.
`22 Q. So they weren't patent cases?
`23 A. No.
`24 Q. Have you ever testified at trial
`25 before?
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 Q. Do you remember what the
`3 treatment arms were in the studies you
`4 were involved with?
`5 MS. DONOVAN: Objection to form.
`6 A. For these -- if you are
`7 referring to the Phase III studies?
`8 Q. Mm-hmm.
`9 A. Yes, I do recall the treatment.
`10 Q. What were they?
`11 A. It was -- there were two arms in
`12 both of the studies. It was abiraterone
`13 acetate plus prednisone versus placebo
`14 plus prednisone.
`15 Q. What were what were your
`16 responsibilities as an investigator in
`17 those clinical trials?
`18 A. So, as an investigator there
`19 were some standard requirements and duties
`20 to generally oversee the conduct of the
`21 study, to make sure that appropriate
`22 persons who are involved in the study are
`23 trained, to make sure that the execution
`24 of the clinical trials and procedures is
`25 done accurately and that data are reported
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`5 (Pages 14 - 17)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 18
`
`Page 20
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 in a timely and accurate fashion.
`3 Q. Were you involved in the
`4 development of the protocol for those
`5 clinical trials?
`6 A. No.
`7 Q. In preparing your declaration
`8 did you do any independent review or
`9 search of the prior art?
`10 A. So, as I stated, I reviewed
`11 exhibits associated with my declaration,
`12 besides my declaration. In my experience
`13 in the field I have reviewed literature
`14 that is related to the issues in this
`15 case, but I did not do a specific
`16 literature search related to the Mylan
`17 case.
`18 Q. Now I would -- maybe we can
`19 clarify some nomenclature so we are on the
`20 same page for the deposition. Do you
`21 understand that abiraterone acetate and
`22 abiraterone are two distinct compounds?
`23 A. Yes, I do.
`24 Q. And abiraterone acetate is the
`25 ingredient in the -- is it a capsule or
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 MS. DONOVAN: I will just note
`3 for the record, the witness is
`4 speaking without the '438 patent in
`5 front of him.
`6 Q. Just so you have a copy in front
`7 of you, before you is what was marked in
`8 the Mylan IPR as Exhibit 1001. It should
`9 be a copy of the '438 patent. Feel free
`10 to look at that if you need to.
`11 How does -- how does an
`12 anticancer effect -- how is that evidenced
`13 clinically? How do you know if
`14 abiraterone has an anticancer effect?
`15 A. So, there are a number of
`16 metrics that can be used to assess the
`17 anticancer effect. Some of the ones
`18 commonly used would be a reduction in
`19 tumor burden as detected on imaging
`20 studies.
`21 So, if a patient has a
`22 measurable metastasis, something that can
`23 be seen and measured on a CT scan, for
`24 example, one can assess the changes in the
`25 size of a particular lesion, tumor, over
`
`Page 19
`
`Page 21
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 tablet that the patient takes? Is that
`3 right?
`4 A. Abiraterone acetate is the
`5 active ingredient in the tablet the
`6 patients take.
`7 Q. And that becomes abiraterone in
`8 the body?
`9 A. Correct.
`10 Q. And that's what has the clinical
`11 effect?
`12 A. That's the active form of the
`13 drug; yes.
`14 Q. With respect to the '438 patent
`15 you understand the word "treatment" or
`16 "treating" has a special meaning?
`17 A. Yes.
`18 Q. What is your understanding of
`19 that meaning?
`20 A. My understanding is that "treat"
`21 specifically refers to an anticancer
`22 effect. For example, eradicating the
`23 primary tumor, reducing tumor burden,
`24 improving clinical outcomes such as
`25 survival.
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 time in response to a therapy.
`3 Another example would be a
`4 change in outcome such as cancer-specific
`5 survival, overall survival, radiographic
`6 progression-free survival.
`7 Q. Overall radiographic
`8 progression-free survival?
`9 A. No. There is something called
`10 overall survival, which is death due to
`11 any cause, including death due to cancer
`12 but it could be death due to heart attack.
`13 There is cancer-specific or
`14 disease-specific survival, which are
`15 deaths that are attributable to the cancer
`16 and exclude non-cancer related deaths.
`17 Then there are other types of
`18 survival end points. Another one would be
`19 radiographic progression-free survival,
`20 which is itself a composite between
`21 radiographic progression and death due to
`22 any cause -- or death due to any cause.
`23 Q. Does PSA level show an
`24 anticancer effect?
`25 A. It really depends on the
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`6 (Pages 18 - 21)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 22
`
`Page 24
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 situation. It's a hypothetical situation,
`3 so I'd really need to know the context in
`4 which the PSA is being measured in order
`5 to assess whether or not it has an
`6 anticancer effect.
`7 Q. What type of contextual
`8 information would you need?
`9 A. The stage and state of the
`10 disease, the type of treatment that is
`11 being implemented would be examples.
`12 Q. For abiraterone acetate plus
`13 prednisone, would a PSA response indicate
`14 antitumor effect?
`15 A. Again, it --
`16 MS. DONOVAN: Allow me to
`17 object. Object to the form of the
`18 question. Calls for speculation.
`19 A. Yeah; again, I think I would
`20 need to know the specifics of the clinical
`21 trial context or clinical context in order
`22 to make that assessment.
`23 Q. Have you seen any clinical data
`24 in preparing your report where you believe
`25 a PSA response showed an anticancer effect
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 You may answer.
`3 A. So, it really -- generally what
`4 we are talking about would be endocrine
`5 therapies that are used after castration.
`6 Q. In that same sentence it says
`7 "improve the clinical outcomes of the
`8 patients with mCRPC." What is meant by
`9 "improve the clinical outcomes"?
`10 A. Clinical outcomes can refer to a
`11 number of different measures, objective
`12 measures of the response to treatment, and
`13 some of them are the ones that I listed
`14 for you in terms of assessing anticancer
`15 effects. "Improve" would mean make
`16 better.
`17 As an example, if one is looking
`18 at objective responses -- in other words
`19 does the tumor shrink -- "improve" would
`20 mean a reduction in tumor burden. And
`21 there are some standardized ways of
`22 establishing the extent of the response,
`23 and those are specific criteria that are
`24 used for clinical trials.
`25 Q. You have previously used
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 25
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 with the treatment of abiraterone acetate
`3 plus prednisone?
`4 A. So, changes in PSA are -- a
`5 change in PSA is a poor surrogate for
`6 changes in tumor burden. So while it is
`7 plausible that change in PSA correlates
`8 with changes in tumor burden, there can be
`9 a disconnect between what the PSA is doing
`10 and what the overall tumor burden is
`11 doing.
`12 Q. I want to get your understanding
`13 of some of the terms used in your report.
`14 I turn you to 38 of your report, your
`15 Mylan declaration.
`16 A. Okay.
`17 Q. I am going to talk about the
`18 last portion on page 24.
`19 MS. DONOVAN: Do you have a copy
`20 for me?
`21 Q. It is the end of paragraph 58,
`22 second to last sentence. You mention
`23 secondary form of therapies. What is
`24 meant by that term?
`25 MS. DONOVAN: Object to form.
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 ketoconazole with a steroid to treat
`3 patients. Is that right?
`4 MS. DONOVAN: Object to the form
`5 of the question. You may answer.
`6 A. Yes, I have. Not recently.
`7 Q. When is the last time you used
`8 that therapy?
`9 A. I don't recall exactly but it's
`10 been years.
`11 Q. Did you believe that therapy
`12 improved the clinical outcome for
`13 patients?
`14 MS. DONOVAN: Object to the form
`15 of the question.
`16 A. My usage of ketoconazole -- and
`17 I would say this is not necessarily
`18 restricted to ketoconazole. When there is
`19 an absence of therapies that I believe to
`20 improve clinical outcomes and a patient is
`21 left with no options but is in a suitable
`22 functional state, sometimes as
`23 oncologists, as I do and many oncologists
`24 do in practice, is we give the patient a
`25 therapy that has not been shown to, in a
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`7 (Pages 22 - 25)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 7
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 26
`
`Page 28
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 rigorous fashion, to improve a clinical
`3 outcome.
`4 Q. In your experience in providing
`5 that therapy to patients, did you believe
`6 it improved their clinical outcome for the
`7 patients?
`8 A. I would just stick with my
`9 answer and just add that I had no evidence
`10 that ketoconazole by itself or in
`11 combination with anything else had an
`12 established effect on clinical outcome.
`13 So, that's how I would answer the
`14 question.
`15 Q. When you prescribed ketoconazole
`16 did you always prescribe it with a
`17 steroid?
`18 A. Yes.
`19 Q. What steroids did you use?
`20 A. Typically -- I used a
`21 glucocorticoid, and that would have been
`22 either hydrocortisone or prednisone, most
`23 commonly hydrocortisone.
`24 Q. And you would have given the
`25 hydrocortisone and prednisone even prior
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 the time or treated prostate cancer at the
`3 time to add back steroids that can replace
`4 the activities that are diminished as a
`5 consequence of ketoconazole.
`6 Q. You did not wait until you saw a
`7 clinical manifestation of adrenal
`8 insufficiency before you provided the
`9 steroids to the patients; correct?
`10 MS. DONOVAN: I object to the
`11 form of the question.
`12 A. The corticosteroids or the
`13 hydrocortisone and prednisone were
`14 generally prescribed at the outset along
`15 with the ketoconazole.
`16 Q. If you could turn to your Mylan
`17 declaration at page 41, please?
`18 A. Okay.
`19 Q. On page 41 there are two
`20 figures, Figure 4 and Figure 5. I see you
`21 have a black and white copy. I have a
`22 color copy if that is helpful for you to
`23 review.
`24 A. Sure. Okay.
`25 Q. Did you prepare these figures?
`
`Page 27
`
`Page 29
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 to seeing a clinical manifestation of a
`3 need for either of those glucocorticoid
`4 therapies?
`5 MS. DONOVAN: I object to the
`6 form of the question.
`7 A. Can you clarify what you mean by
`8 "need"?
`9 Q. Why was the glucocorticoid given
`10 in conjunction with ketoconazole?
`11 A. Ketoconazole has a mechanism of
`12 action whereby it inhibits the
`13 biosynthesis of all adrenal steroids.
`14 These are steroids such as
`15 mineralocorticoids, glucocorticoids and
`16 adrenal androgens.
`17 While ketoconazole can be and
`18 has been published to be used by itself as
`19 a monotherapy, the frequency with which
`20 patients who get ketoconazole monotherapy
`21 of adrenal insufficiency and complicated
`22 related to the absence of or reduction in
`23 mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid,
`24 homo-concentrations prompted me and most
`25 oncologists who treat prostate cancer at
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 A. I worked with my counsel to
`3 generate these figures. Well, to bring
`4 these figures in. So, that's what I did.
`5 I didn't actually make the original
`6 figure.
`7 Q. These were kind of developed
`8 with your guidance?
`9 A. Correct.
`10 Q. What do the X's, the red X's
`11 shown with Figures 4 and 5 represent?
`12 A. Those indicate the principal
`13 sites of enzyme inhibition by the
`14 respective drugs.
`15 Q. And why are the X's different
`16 sizes? Are you trying to show something
`17 with that?
`18 A. Yes. The X's are different
`19 sizes to indicate the extent, the relative
`20 extent, on a schematic level, to which the
`21 respective drugs inhibit the indicated
`22 enzymes.
`23 Q. So, the larger X would indicate
`24 that something is a more potent
`25 inhibitor --
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`8 (Pages 26 - 29)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 8
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 30
`
`Page 32
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 A. Yes. The larger X indicates
`3 that the drug has a greater impact on
`4 inhibiting the enzyme associated with the
`5 larger X.
`6 Q. For ketoconazole, what evidence
`7 do you have that desmolase is a more
`8 potent inhibitor than -- that ketoconazole
`9 is a more potent inhibitor of the
`10 desmolase enzyme than 17 hydroxylase and
`11 17,20-lyase?
`12 A. So, there is literature that
`13 looked at the effects of ketoconazole and
`14 these enzymes. For example, one of the
`15 articles that is sited in the Mylan
`16 petition, the Sonino reference,
`17 specifically described the effects of
`18 ketoconazole on these different enzymes
`19 within the adrenal steroid synthesis
`20 pathways.
`21 Q. What was the reference?
`22 A. I believe it was the Sonino
`23 reference.
`24 Q. In your figure, should there be
`25 an X on the line from progesterone to 17
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 inhibition of the desmolase enzyme?
`3 MS. DONOVAN: Objection to form.
`4 A. What do you mean by "complete"?
`5 Q. Does it entirely block the
`6 activity of the desmolase enzyme?
`7 A. So, when we talk about
`8 inhibition we are talking about
`9 concentrations of the drug that -- the way
`10 it's typically reported is the
`11 concentration of the drug that inhibits
`12 50 percent of the activity; okay? And
`13 there is a range of concentrations,
`14 obviously, that a drug can -- that are
`15 required for a drug to inhibit a
`16 particular enzyme.
`17 So, "complete" to me sounds like
`18 100 percent. And while it
`19 predominantly -- ketoconazole
`20 predominantly inhibits that enzyme,
`21 desmolase, involved in the first step of
`22 steroid biosynthesis, I don't know it is
`23 100 percent. I don't know that we can say
`24 any drug inhibits something 100 percent in
`25 the concentrations that are achievable in
`
`Page 31
`
`Page 33
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 OH-progesterone?
`3 A. So, CYP17, it does also mediate
`4 the conversion of progesterone to 17
`5 hydroxyprogesterone. So it is the same
`6 enzyme that is converting pregnenolone to
`7 17 hydroxypregnenolone.
`8 So yes, this is a simplified
`9 version of that, but it is the same enzyme
`10 involved in the two steps, which is the 17
`11 alpha-hydroxylation.
`12 Q. So for abiraterone -- well, let
`13 me -- Figure 4, should that be abiraterone
`14 acetate, or abiraterone?
`15 A. It probably should be the active
`16 form of it, or could be. I think the
`17 point is that -- I think everyone
`18 understands what the point is, and that is
`19 the active form of the drug.
`20 Q. Are there differences in the
`21 activity between abiraterone acetate and
`22 abiraterone?
`23 A. Yes. Abiraterone is the active
`24 form of the compound. Yes.
`25 Q. Is ketoconazole a complete
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 a human being.
`3 Q. Do you know to what extent
`4 ketoconazole inhibits desmolase?
`5 A. Again, are you referring to
`6 the -- I don't know what you mean by "to
`7 what extent."
`8 Q. Do you know the IC50 value
`9 for ketaconazole --
`10 A. I don't know it offhand.
`11 (Brief interruption)
`12 Q. Do you know the IC50 value
`13 for desmolase?
`14 A. I don't recall the specific
`15 number.
`16 Q. Do you recall seeing the
`17 specific number in preparing your
`18 declaration?
`19 A. I can't recall.
`20 Q. Looking at Figure 4, with
`21 abiraterone, the pathway to cortisol is
`22 inhibited by abiraterone? All pathways to
`23 cortisol are inhibited by abiraterone; is
`24 that right?
`25 MS. DONOVAN: Object to the form
`
`VERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS
`202-803-8830
`
`9 (Pages 30 - 33)
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1135 PAGE 9
`
`

`

`Matthew B Rettig , M.D.
`
`March 31, 2017
`
`Page 34
`
`Page 36
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 of the question.
`3 A. The figure is not demonstrating
`4 or is meant to demonstration the --
`5 that -- it does not demonstrate the
`6 effects of abiraterone acetate on the
`7 concentrations of specific hormones.
`8 Q. Did the prior art teach that the
`9 administration of abiraterone acetate
`10 would cause a reduction in the level of
`11 cortisol?
`12 A. No.
`13 Q. Doctor, I have given you a copy
`14 of what has been marked in the Mylan IPR
`15 as Exhibit 1005. You may recognize that
`16 as the '213 patent or the Barrie patent.
`17 A. Yes.
`18 Q. That is something you reviewed;
`19 correct?
`20 A. Yes.
`21 Q. And one of the points you make
`22 from Barrie is that abiraterone has
`23 differential activity with respect to
`24 inhibition of lyase and hydroxylase. Is
`25 that right?
`
`1 M. Rettig
`2 that were used to establish the effects of
`3 abiraterone on these enzymes.
`4 Q. Is that another way of saying
`5 you don't know if the data reported at the
`6 bottom of column 22 reflects the activity
`7 of abiraterone? Is that correct?
`8 MS. DONOVAN: Objection. Asked
`9 and answered.
`10 A. I don't know what the authors of
`11 this patent were indicating here. The way
`12 I interpret this is that abiraterone, the
`13 acti

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket