throbber
Clinical report 843
`
`Effect of combination therapy with aminoglutethimide and
`hydrocortisone on prostate-specific antigen response in
`metastatic prostate cancer refractory to standard endocrine
`therapy
`W. H. J. Kruita, G. Stotera and J. G. M. Klijna
`
`A prospective study was performed to investigate the
`combination of the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide
`and hydrocortisone in androgen-independent prostate
`cancer with changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA)
`level as main determinant for response. Thirty-five patients
`were treated with aminoglutethimide 1000 mg daily and
`hydrocortisone acetate 40 mg daily. PSA measurements
`were performed every month. If evaluable lesions were
`present, objective tumor assessment was done by
`computed tomography scan and X-ray investigations. In 12
`patients (37%) the PSA value showed a confirmed
`response with a decline in serum level of at least 50%.
`Median time to progression in responding and all patients
`was 10.5 and 4.5 months, respectively. Median duration of
`response in responding patients was 9 months. Median
`survival for these two groups was 23 and 14.5 months,
`respectively. Of seven patients with measurable disease,
`two showed a partial response and five a stable disease.
`Improvement in general condition, pain and feeling of
`
`well-being was noted in two-thirds of patients. Therapy was
`well tolerated with mainly grade I and II adverse events
`in 20% of patients. We conclude that aminoglutethimide
`is a valuable second-line therapy for patients with
`androgen-independent prostate cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs
`15:843–847 c 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
`
`Anti-Cancer Drugs 2004, 15:843–847
`
`Keywords: aminoglutethimide, androgen independent, prostate cancer,
`prostate-specific antigen
`
`aDepartment of Medical Oncology, Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus
`Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
`
`Correspondence to W. H. J. Kruit, Department of Medical Oncology, Daniel den
`Hoed Cancer Center, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 5201, 3008 AE
`Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
`Tel: + 3110 439 17 54; fax: + 3110 439 10 03;
`e-mail: w.kruit@erasmusmc.nl
`
`Received 17 February 2004 Revised form accepted 7 July 2004
`
`Introduction
`Standard first-line therapy of proven efficacy for meta-
`static prostate carcinoma consists of hormonal manipula-
`tion by androgen ablation, achieved either by surgical
`castration or by the use of a luteinizing hormone-releasing
`hormone agonist (LHRH) in combination with antian-
`drogen therapy [1]. However, all patients will eventually
`relapse and once the disease becomes progressive after
`complete androgen blockade, further therapeutic options
`are limited [2]. As second-line therapy, various modalities
`have been explored such as other hormonal manipula-
`tions, cytotoxic chemotherapy and also the naphthylurea
`derivative suramin, but none of these treatments has
`demonstrated substantial efficacy, while they are accom-
`panied by sometimes significant side-effects [2]. Only
`recently, a new class of cytostatics, the taxanes, has shown
`notable antitumor activity in hormone-refractory prostate
`carcinoma. However, the final significance of taxanes has
`to be demonstrated in phase III trials [3].
`
`A major problem in determining the exact antitumor
`activity of agents in metastatic prostate cancer is the
`objectivity of response assessment. In most patients
`disease is restricted to bone localizations which are
`0959-4973 c 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
`
`notoriously difficult to evaluate. Prostate-specific antigen
`(PSA) is a glycoprotein almost exclusively present in
`normal and malignant prostate cells. Approximately 10
`years ago a correlation was demonstrated between
`changes in PSA levels and tumor response [4]. Since
`then, PSA measurements have become an early indicator
`of progression and response [5–8]. After a consensus
`conference held in the USA, PSA had been accepted as a
`surrogate parameter for response evaluation in prostate
`cancer [9–11]. Standards were defined and guidelines
`were formulated.
`
`first-line
`In patients with progressive disease after
`endocrine therapy, a small proportion can respond to a
`secondary hormonal manipulation, suggesting that the
`prostate cancer cells have retained a certain degree of
`hormone sensitivity. After surgical or medical castration
`the adrenal gland is the main extratesticular source of
`androgens and can produce sufficient testosterone to
`maintain a continued stimulation of tumor cells. Initially,
`adrenal ablation was achieved by major surgical proce-
`dures
`such as adrenalectomy and hypophysectomy,
`which yielded some antitumor activity [12–15]. Later
`on, surgical adrenalectomy was replaced by medical
`
`Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000188
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1110 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`844 Anti-Cancer Drugs 2004, Vol 15 No 9
`
`adrenalectomy with adrenal-suppressive agents. Amino-
`glutethimide is a potent inhibitor of adrenal steroid
`biosynthesis by blocking the enzyme aromatase. The
`effectivity of aminoglutethimide as second-line therapy
`in patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma was
`suggested in a number of studies [16–27]. However,
`most of these reports were published in the 1980s. At
`that time, PSA determinations were not yet available and
`response evaluation was mainly done by difficult to
`interpret X-rays and bone scintigraphy. We have carried
`out a prospective phase II study with aminoglutethimide
`and hydrocortisone in patients with prostate cancer
`refractory to standard hormone therapy with the pre-
`dominant use of PSA measurements
`to determine
`antitumor activity.
`
`Patients and methods
`Patients with biopsy-proven stage D2 prostate carcinoma
`and disease progression following orchidectomy or
`refractory to standard endocrine therapy with LHRH
`agonists with or without the concomitant use of an
`antiandrogen were prospectively included in the study.
`Prior treatment with chemotherapy was allowed. A rising
`PSA level and/or radiological investigations demonstrated
`progressive disease. Prior to start of treatment an initial
`evaluation was carried out including medical history,
`physical examination, hematology, serum biochemistry
`with PSA measurement, urinalysis, bone scintigraphy,
`skeletal X-rays and, if indicated, computed tomography
`(CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients gave
`their informed consent.
`
`Aminoglutethimide 250 mg 2 times a day was given orally
`for the first 2 weeks. All patients received hydrocortisone
`acetate 40 mg daily (20 mg in the morning, 10 mg in the
`afternoon, 10 mg in the evening) as glucocorticoid
`replacement. If no side-effects such as skin rash, lethargy,
`nausea and dizziness occurred, aminoglutethimide ad-
`ministration was further escalated to 500 mg 2 times a
`day. In case of grade 2 toxicity the hydrocortisone dose
`was increased to 80 mg/day until the adverse event
`subsided. In patients who developed grade 3 other than
`skin toxicity, aminoglutethimide was discontinued per-
`manently. Toxicity was determined according to NCI-
`CTC criteria. In patients under therapy with a LHRH
`agonist this medication was continued. Other antitumor
`medication was not allowed.
`
`Repeat clinical evaluation and measurement of hemato-
`logy and biochemical indices including PSA were carried
`out monthly for the first 3 months and at 2-monthly
`intervals thereafter. At each visit patients were routinely
`asked to indicate whether there was any improvement in
`pain or other symptoms during treatment with study
`medication.
`
`PSA response criteria were those proposed by the
`National Prostate Cancer Project Group for phase II
`trials in hormone refractory prostate cancer [9]. A PSA
`response was defined as a decline in PSA value by at least
`50%, which had to be confirmed by a second PSA
`measurement four or more weeks later. Moreover, no
`increase in the size of pre-existing metastases, no
`appearance of new lesions and no clinical signs of tumor
`progression were allowed. The term ‘complete PSA
`response’ was not used. In patients whose PSA had not
`decreased, progressive disease was a 25% increase over
`the baseline level and confirmed by a second value. In
`patients whose PSA had decreased but had not reached
`response criteria, progressive disease was considered to
`have occurred when PSA had increased 25% over the
`nadir and was confirmed by a second measurement. Time
`to PSA progression was defined from the first treatment
`day until the date PSA values had increased by 50% from
`the nadir levels for responders or by 25% for patients not
`reaching a 50% decline in PSA levels. Duration of PSA
`response was measured from time at which PSA had
`declined to 50% or less to the time when PSA had risen
`by 50% above nadir. If clinical progression occurred before
`PSA progression, the date of clinical progression was
`used.
`
`In patients with measurable soft tissue lesions response
`evaluation by PSA measurements was complemented by
`repeated radiological examinations. A complete response
`was defined as the disappearance of any pre-treatment
`tumor lesions for a duration of at least 4 weeks. Partial
`response was a 50% or greater reduction in the sum of the
`products of the largest perpendicular diameters of all
`measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks. Other criteria for
`progressive disease were an increase of more than 25% of
`any of the measurable lesions and/or the appearance of a
`new lesion, decline in performance status (WHO) or the
`need for radiation therapy.
`
`The survival and progression-free survival durations were
`calculated from the on-study date until date of progres-
`sion, death or last follow-up as appropriate.
`
`Results
`Patient characteristics
`Thirty-five patients were included in the study. An
`overview of the demographics is given in Table 1. The
`median age was 67 years (range 39–92). The median
`WHO performance status was 1 (range 0–2). Thirty-three
`patients (94%) had bone, six (17%) lymph node and one
`(3%) lung metastases. Metastatic disease was confined to
`one, two or three organ sites in 26 (74%), eight (23%) and
`one patients (3%), respectively. Fifteen patients (43%)
`had undergone an orchidectomy with or without the
`concomitant use of an antiandrogen, and 20 (57%) had
`received prior treatment with the combination of a
`
`Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000189
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1110 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Table 1 Patient characteristics
`
`No. patients
`Age (median, range)
`Performance status (WHO)
`Initial PSA level (ng/ml) (median, range)
`Localization of metastases
`bone
`lymph node
`lung
`liver
`miscellaneous
`No. metastatic sites
`1
`2
`3
`Prior therapies
`orchidectomy
`orchidectomy + antiandrogen
`LHRH agonist + antiandrogen
`chemotherapy (including estramustine)
`estrogens
`radiotherapy (for metastasis)
`No. prior therapies
`1
`2
`3
`
`35
`67 (39–92)
`1 (0–2)
`216 (15–6719)
`
`33
`6
`1
`0
`3
`
`26
`8
`1
`
`9
`6
`20
`12
`1
`15
`
`12
`15
`8
`
`LHRH agonist and an antiandrogen. Twelve patients
`(37%) were progressive after chemotherapy including
`estramustine. The patient group was heavily pre-treated
`with 23 patients (66%), who had received at least two
`prior treatment regimes.
`
`Treatment results
`All 35 patients were evaluable for response. An overview
`of the treatment results is given in Table 2. According to
`the defined criteria for PSA response, 13 patients (37%)
`developed a confirmed response [95% confidence interval
`(CI) 22–53%]. Furthermore, minor reductions in PSA
`levels (37, 38, 40 and 43%) were seen in another four
`patients. Only five patients (14%) demonstrated a
`straightforward progressive increase in PSA levels within
`8 weeks after treatment start. For the total patient cohort
`the median PSA value fell from 216 ng/ml at baseline to
`43 ng/ml, a decrease of at least 80%.
`
`The median time to progression for responding patients
`was 10.5 months (range 3.5–23.5). The median response
`duration was 9 months (range 3–21.5). Median survival for
`responding patients was 23 months (range 7–38). For all
`patients median time to progressive disease as measured
`by PSA levels was 4.5 months (range 0.5–23.5). The
`median survival was 14.5 months (range 0.5–38). The
`progression-free survival after 1 year with aminoglutethi-
`mide based on PSA determinations was 14%.
`
`In seven patients, measurable soft tissue metastases were
`present at the start of therapy with aminoglutethimide.
`One patient developed a complete response of retro-
`peritoneal lymph node metastases with a concomitant
`decline in PSA level of more than 50%. A second patient
`with lymph node metastases showed a partial response of
`
`Aminoglutethimide in metastatic prostate cancer Kruit et al. 845
`
`Table 2 Treatment results
`
`PSA response
`Time to progressionFresponders (median)
`Response duration (median)
`Time to progressionFall patients (median)
`Survival (median)
`SurvivalFresponders (median)
`SurvivalFnon-responders (median)
`Progression-free survival at 1 year
`
`12 (37%)
`10.5 months (3.5–23.5)
`9 months (3–21.5)
`4.5 months (0.5–23.5)
`14.5 months (0.5–38)
`23 months (7–38)
`13 months (0.5–32)
`14%
`
`a PSA
`accompanied by
`localizations
`these tumor
`response. In the other five patients, tumor evaluation
`by CT revealed stable disease. In three of them, PSA
`levels remained unchanged, and in two, PSA increased
`progressively. All other patients had non-evaluable or non-
`measurable lesions, mostly bone.
`
`Although no validated quality of life questionnaire or
`standardized symptom improvement scoring system was
`used in this study, therapy with aminoglutethimide
`showed subjective benefits as improvement of perfor-
`mance status,
`increase in appetite, weight gain and
`decrease of pain complains in a considerable number of
`patients. All responding patients except one showed a
`clear improvement in their sense of well-being. These
`positive effects of
`treatment were not
`limited to
`responding patients only, because overall 24 patients
`(69%) indicated an improved general condition and
`quality of life while on therapy with aminoglutethimide.
`In addition, 22 patients (62%) indicated a significant
`decrease in pain complaints.
`
`Toxicity
`The median treatment duration was 4.5 months. In all
`patients
`the dose of
`aminoglutethimide could be
`escalated to 1000 mg/day. The frequency of adverse
`events induced by aminoglutethimide in this patient
`group was low. Only eight episodes of toxicity, mostly
`grade I and II, were observed in seven patients. Fever
`(grade II) occurred in two patients. One patient
`developed grade I anorexia. Increase in liver transaminase
`levels was observed twice (one grade I, one grade II).
`There were three episodes of skin toxicity consisting of
`an erythematous itching skin rash, one grade I and two
`grade III. In both patients with grade III skin toxicity
`treatment with aminoglutethimide was interrupted and
`the hydrocortisone dose doubled. In one patient amino-
`glutethimide could be resumed without reappearance of
`any adverse event, in the other patient treatment had to
`be discontinued permanently. No dose modifications of
`aminoglutethimide in the other patients turned out to be
`necessary.
`
`Discussion
`In this study of the combination of aminoglutethimide
`and hydrocortisone in patients with androgen-indepen-
`dent prostate cancer a PSA response rate of 37% was
`
`Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000190
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1110 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`846 Anti-Cancer Drugs 2004, Vol 15 No 9
`
`achieved with a median response duration of 9 months.
`Overall for the whole group the median survival was 14.5
`months and for the responders 23 months. The response
`analysis was based on PSA measurements, which have
`been shown to accurately reflect the treatment benefit
`for the patients, both in terms of palliation and survival
`[8–10]. In previously published trials using aminoglu-
`tethimide, response percentages of 0–50% have been
`reported (Table 3) [16–28]. However, all these studies
`were performed more than a decade ago with response
`evaluation based on non-reproducible imaging with X-rays
`and bone scans. Of note, in most of these trials patients
`with clinically stable disease have been considered as
`responding patients and were included in the response
`percentage. The observed median survival of more than
`14 months is noteworthy in comparison with survival data
`reported in androgen-independent prostate cancer pati-
`ents, varying between 6 and 12 months [18,21,23–26].
`It is clear that the treatment results of the study
`presented here, based on the course of PSA values, are
`at least comparable with those observed in other trials.
`Additionally, the improvement in subjective feelings of
`well-being and symptom control in two-thirds of patients
`is striking.
`
`The assumption that PSA changes could be of value in
`predicting the outcome of therapy in patients with
`androgen-independent prostate cancer was first intro-
`duced by Ferro et al. [4]. Since then several investigators
`have reported a correlation between a decrease in PSA
`levels and clinical benefit and survival [5–8]. A decline of
`at least 50% in PSA during therapy was associated with
`improved survival. Meanwhile an increasing number of
`
`phase II trials has incorporated PSA as a marker. In 1999
`the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group formulated
`eligibility criteria and response guidelines for the use of
`PSA as a parameter for treatment outcome [9]. It was
`concluded that PSA determinations could be used as an
`accurate method to evaluate new agents for the treat-
`ment of metastatic prostate cancer. The experience in
`the here presented study is in agreement with this
`observation. To our knowledge, one other study has
`been published demonstrating a therapeutic effect of
`aminoglutethimide on PSA in hormone-refractory pros-
`tate cancer [27]. A PSA decrease of at least 80% was
`observed in 48% of patients with a concomitant
`improvement in soft tissue lesions, bone scans, anemia
`and thrombocytopenia if present. The authors reported a
`median decrease in PSA levels of 73%,
`remarkably
`comparable with the nadir of 80% of the baseline value
`found in our study. In another study the combination of
`aminoglutethimide and suramin was investigated in
`patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer.
`The response rate (greater than 50% decline in PSA)
`was 23.5%, time to progression 4.4 months and survival
`time 15.3 months [28].
`
`Treatment with aminoglutethimide resulted in a sig-
`nificant improvement of general condition in more than
`two-thirds of our patients. This was not only the case in
`patients with a clear PSA response, but also patients
`without a decrease in PSA level of 50% or more fared
`significantly better with regard to subjective parameters
`such as
`feeling of well-being, pain, appetite and
`performance status. Other investigators have also docu-
`mented these positive effects of aminoglutethimide on
`
`Table 3 Summary of prior performed trials with aminoglutethimide
`
`Author/year/reference
`
`Patient no.
`
`Response objective
`
`Response
`subjective
`
`Response marker
`
`TTP
`
`Survival
`
`(A) Monotherapy aminoglutethimide
`Robinson 1974 [16]
`Rostom 1982 [18]
`Ponder 1984 [19]
`
`Drago 1984 [20]
`
`Murray 1985 [21]
`
`Harnett 1987 [22]
`
`Elomaa 1988 [23]
`
`Samojlik 1988 [24]
`
`Labrie 1989 [25]
`
`Chang 1989 [26]
`
`Sartor 1994 [27]
`
`26
`15
`40
`
`43
`
`58
`
`34
`
`20
`
`50
`
`119
`
`28
`
`29
`
`0
`0
`15%
`1 PR, 5 SD
`40%
`1 CR, 6 PR, 10 SD
`33%
`1 CR, 10 PR, 8 SD
`21%
`1 PR, 6 SD
`22%
`4 PR
`50%
`8 PR, 17 SD
`
`14%
`1 CR, 2 PR, 14 SD
`32%
`9 SD
`21%
`6 PR
`
`(B) Combination therapy/aminoglutethimide and suramin
`Dawson 1998 [28]
`81
`
`20%
`
`70%
`75%
`48%
`
`NE
`
`29%
`
`21%
`
`75%
`
`NE
`
`NE
`
`32%
`
`56%
`
`NE
`
`31%
`NE
`20%
`2 CR, 6 PR
`NE
`
`NE
`
`NE
`
`40%
`8 PR
`NE
`
`NE
`
`11%
`1 CR, 2 PR
`48%
`7 CR, 7 PR
`
`24%
`19 PR
`
`NE
`NE
`resp: 8 months
`non-resp: NE
`34 weeks
`
`10 months
`
`4–18 months
`
`NE
`6.5 months
`NE
`
`NE
`
`resp: 12 months
`non-resp: 5 months
`NE
`
`4 months (subjective)
`
`8 months
`
`NE
`
`NE
`
`NE
`
`resp: 88 weeks
`stable: 38 weeks
`non-resp: 18 weeks
`resp: 21 months
`non-resp: 9 months
`6 months
`
`16 weeks
`
`NE
`
`4.5 months
`
`15 months
`
`Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000191
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1110 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`subjective indicators of therapeutic efficacy [16,18,19,
`21–23,26,27]. The precise mechanism of action of
`aminoglutethimide is unknown.
`It
`is unlikely that
`suppression of estrogen production by aromatase inhibi-
`tion is responsible for the observed tumor regression or
`clinical improvement. In several small studies the new
`selective aromatase inhibitors such as 4-hydroxyandroste-
`nedione and anastrozole have been investigated in
`androgen-independent prostate carcinoma [29,30]. No
`objective antitumor activity or PSA response was observed.
`
`In conclusion, combination therapy with aminoglutethi-
`mide and hydrocortisone is an effective treatment
`modality for androgen-independent prostate cancer.
`
`References
`1 McLeod DG, O’Brien ME. Hormonal management of metastatic prostate
`cancer and quality of life issues. In: Vogelzang NJ, Scardino PT, Shipley WU,
`Coffey DS (editors): Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology.
`Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996, pp. 854–864.
`2 Smith DC, Bahnson RR, Trump DL, Dawson NA, Trepel J. Management of
`hormone refractory disease. In: Vogelzang NJ, Scardino PT, Shipley WU,
`Coffey DS (editors): Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology.
`Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996, pp. 885–914.
`3 Petrylak DP. Docetaxel (Taxotere) in hormone refractory prostate cancer.
`Semin Oncol 2000; 27(suppl 3):24–29.
`4 Ferro MA, Gillatt D, Symes MO, et al. High dose intravenous estrogen
`therapy in advanced prostatic carcinoma: use of serum prostate-specific
`antigen to monitor response. Urology 1989; 43:134–138.
`5 Kelly WK, Scher HI, Mazumdar M, et al. Prostate-specific antigen as a
`measure of disease outcome in metastatic hormone refractory prostate
`cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11:607–615.
`6 Smith DC, Dunn RL, Stawderman MS, et al. Change in serum prostate-
`specific antigen as a marker of response to cytotoxic therapy for hormone-
`refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:1835–1843.
`7 Scher HI, Kelly WK, Zhang ZF, et al. Post-therapy serum prostate-specific
`antigen level and survival in patients with androgen-independent prostate
`cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:244–251.
`8 Halabi S, Conaway MR, Small EJ, Vogelzang NJ, Dawson NA. Prostate
`specific antigen as a predictor of survival in prostate cancer patients treated
`with second-line hormonal therapy (CALGB 9181). Prostate J 2001; 3:
`18–25.
`9 Bubley GJ, Carducci M, Dahut W, et al. Eligibility and response guidelines
`for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer:
`recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group. J Clin
`Oncol 1999; 17:3461–3467.
`10 Balk SP, Ko YJ, Bubley GJ. Biology of prostate-specific antigen. J Clin Oncol
`2003; 21:383–391.
`11 Scher HI, Eisenberger M, D’Amico AV, et al. Eligibility and outcomes
`reporting guidelines for clinical trials for patients in the state of a rising
`prostate-specific antigen: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific
`Antigen Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:537–556.
`
`Aminoglutethimide in metastatic prostate cancer Kruit et al. 847
`
`12 Huggins C, Scott WW. Bilateral adrenalectomy in prostatic cancer: clinical
`features and urinary excretion of 17-ketosteroids and estrogens. Ann Surg
`1945; 122:1031–1041.
`13 Mahoney EM, Harrison JH. Bilateral adrenalectomy for palliative treatment of
`prostate cancer. J Urol 1954; 72:485.
`14 Murphy GP, Reynoso G, Schoonees R, et al. Hypophysectomy and
`adrenalectomy for disseminated prostate carcinoma. J Urol 1971;
`105:817–825.
`15 Resnick MI, Grayhack JT. Treatment of stage IV carcinoma of the prostate.
`Urol Clin North Am 1975; 2:141–157.
`16 Robinson MRG, Shearer RJ, Fergusson JD. Adrenal suppression in the
`treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Br J Urol 1974; 46:555–559.
`17 Sanford EJ, Drago JR, Rohner TJ, Santen R, Lipton A. Aminoglutethimide
`medical adrenalectomy for advanced prostatic carcinoma. J Urol 1976;
`115:170–174.
`18 Rostom AY, Folkes A, Lord C, Notley RG, Schweitzer FAW, White WF.
`Aminoglutethimide therapy for advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Br J
`Urol 1982; 54:552–555.
`19 Ponder BAJ, Shearer RJ, Pocock RD, et al. Response to aminoglutethimide
`and cortisone acetate in advanced prostatic cancer. Br J Cancer 1984;
`50:757–763.
`20 Drago JR, Santen RJ, Lipton A, et al. Clinical effect of aminoglutethimide,
`medical adrenalectomy, in treatment of 43 patients with advanced prostatic
`carcinoma. Cancer 1984; 53:1447–1450.
`21 Murray R, Pitt P. Treatment of advanced prostatic cancer resistant to
`convential therapy, with aminoglutethimide. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1985;
`21:453–458.
`22 Harnett PR, Raghavan D, Caterson I, et al. Aminoglutethimide in advanced
`prostatic carcinoma. Br J Urol 1987; 59:323–327.
`23 Elomaa I, Taube T, Blomqvist C, Rissanen P, Rannikko S, Alfthan O.
`Aminoglutethimide for advanced prostatic cancer resistant to conventional
`hormonal therapy. Eur Urol 1988; 14:104–106.
`24 Samojlik E, Lippman AJ, Kirschner MA, Ertel NH, Park Y, Szmal E. Medical
`adrenalectomy for advanced prostatic cancer: clinical and hormonal effects.
`Am J Clin Oncol 1988; 11:579–585.
`25 Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A, et al. Anti-hormone treatment for prostate
`cancer relapsing after treatment with flutamide and castration. Addition of
`aminoglutethimide and low dose hydrocortisone to combination therapy.
`Br J Urol 1989; 63:634–638.
`26 Chang AY, Bennett JM, Pandya KJ, Asbury R, McCune C. A study of
`aminoglutethimide and hydrocortisone in patients with advanced
`and refractory prostate carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 1989; 12:
`358–360.
`27 Sartor O, Cooper M, Weinberger M, et al. Surprising activity of flutamide
`withdrawal, when combined with aminoglutethimide, in treatment
`of ‘hormone refractory’ prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86:
`222–227.
`28 Dawson N, Figg WD, Brawley OW, et al. Phase II study of suramin plus
`aminoglutethimide in two cohorts of patients with androgen-independent
`prostate cancer: simultaneous antiandrogen withdrawal and prior
`antiandrogen withdrawal. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4:37–44.
`29 Davies JH, Dowsett M, Jacobs S, Coombes RC, Hedley A, Shearer RJ.
`Aromatase inhibition: 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA, CGP 32349) in
`advanced prostatic cancer. Br J Cancer 1992; 66:139–142.
`30 Santen RJ, Petroni GR, Fisch MJ, Myers CE, Theodorescu D, Cohen RB.
`Use of the aromatase inhibitor Anastrozole in the treatment of patients with
`advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92:2095–2101.
`
`Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
`
`DEF-ABIRA-0000192
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1110 PAGE 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket