throbber
V O L U M E 2 8 䡠 N U M B E R 9 䡠 M A R C H 2 0 2 0 1 0
`
`JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`O R I G I N A L R E P O R T
`
`Significant and Sustained Antitumor Activity in Post-
`Docetaxel, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With the
`CYP17 Inhibitor Abiraterone Acetate
`Alison H.M. Reid, Gerhardt Attard, Daniel C. Danila, Nikhil Babu Oommen, David Olmos, Peter C. Fong,
`L. Rhoda Molife, Joanne Hunt, Christina Messiou, Christopher Parker, David Dearnaley, Joost F. Swennenhuis,
`Leon W.M.M. Terstappen, Gloria Lee, Thian Kheoh, Arturo Molina, Charles J. Ryan, Eric Small,
`Howard I. Scher, and Johann S. de Bono
`See accompanying editorial on page 1447 and articles on pages 1481 and 1496
`
`A
`
`B
`
`S
`
`T
`
`R
`
`A
`
`C
`
`T
`
`Purpose
`The principal objective of this trial was to evaluate the antitumor activity of abiraterone acetate, an
`oral, specific, irreversible inhibitor of CYP17 in docetaxel-treated patients with castration-resistant
`prostate cancer (CRPC).
`Patients and Methods
`In this multicenter, two-stage, phase II study, abiraterone acetate 1,000 mg was administered
`once daily continuously. The primary end point was achievement of a prostate-specific antigen
`(PSA) decline of ⱖ 50% in at least seven of 35 patients. Per an attained phase II design, more than
`35 patients could be enrolled if the primary end point was met. Secondary objectives included:
`PSA declines of ⱖ 30% and ⱖ 90%; rate of RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)
`responses and duration on study; time to PSA progression; safety and tolerability; and circulating
`tumor cell (CTC) enumeration.
`Results
`Docetaxel-treated patients with CRPC (N ⫽ 47) were enrolled. PSA declines of ⱖ 30%, ⱖ 50%
`and ⱖ 90% were seen in 68% (32 of 47), 51% (24 of 47), and 15% (seven of 47) of patients,
`respectively. Partial responses (by RECIST) were reported in eight (27%) of 30 patients with
`measurable disease. Median time to PSA progression was 169 days (95% CI, 113 to 281 days).
`The median number of weeks on study was 24, and 12 (25.5%) of 47 patients remained on
`study ⱖ 48 weeks. CTCs were enumerated in 34 patients; 27 (79%) of 34 patients had at least five
`CTCs at baseline. Eleven (41%) of 27 patients had a decline from at least five to less than 5 CTCs,
`and 18 (67%) of 27 had a ⱖ 30% decline in CTCs after starting treatment with abiraterone acetate.
`Abiraterone acetate was well tolerated.
`Conclusion
`Abiraterone acetate has significant antitumor activity in post-docetaxel patients with CRPC.
`Randomized, phase III trials of abiraterone acetate are underway to define the future role of
`this agent.
`
`J Clin Oncol 28:1489-1495. © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the
`second-most common cause of cancer-related death
`in men in the developed world.1,2 Docetaxel is the
`only currently approved drug to have shown a sur-
`vival advantage in CRPC, with a median survival
`advantage of 2 to 3 months and improved quality of
`life reported.3 The continued importance of andro-
`gen receptor (AR) activation and signaling in CRPC
`is increasingly recognized.4-6 AR-activating ligands
`
`originating in the adrenal glands or occurring by de
`novo synthesis may be activating CRPC.7-10 The
`successful development of aromatase (CYP19) in-
`hibitors in breast cancer raises the question of
`whether CYP targeting may be similarly successful
`in prostate cancer (PCa).11
`The key enzyme in steroid biosynthesis leading
`to production of androgenic and estrogenic steroids
`is CYP17.12 Inhibition of CYP17 results in decreased
`levels of downstream androgens and reduced pe-
`ripheral conversion to the more potent androgens
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`1489
`
`From the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation
`Trust and The Institute of Cancer
`Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom;
`Genitourinary Oncology Service, Depart-
`ment of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Center
`for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memo-
`rial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New
`York, NY; University of Twente, Depart-
`ment of Medical Cell BioPhysics,
`Enschede, the Netherlands; and Cougar
`Biotechnology, Los Angeles; and Depart-
`ment of Medicine, University of California,
`San Francisco, CA.
`
`Submitted June 23, 2009; accepted Octo-
`ber 27, 2009; published online ahead of
`print at www.jco.org on February 16, 2010.
`
`Presented at the 98th Annual Meeting
`of the American Association for Cancer
`Research, April 14-18, 2007, Los Ange-
`les, CA; Annual European Society for
`Medical Oncology Conference, July 5-8,
`2007, Lugano, Switzerland; Annual
`National Cancer Research Institute
`Conference, September 30-October 3,
`2007, Birmingham, United Kingdom;
`Annual Genitourinary Meeting of the
`American Society of Clinical Oncology,
`February 14-16, 2008, San Francisco,
`CA; 44th Annual Meeting of the Ameri-
`can Society of Clinical Oncology, May
`30-June 3, 2008, Chicago, IL; and the
`45th Annual Meeting of the American
`Society of Clinical Oncology, May
`29-June 2, 2009, Orlando, FL.
`
`Authors’ disclosures of potential con-
`flicts of interest and author contribu-
`tions are found at the end of this
`article.
`
`Clinical Trials repository link available on
`JCO.org.
`
`Corresponding author: Johann S. de Bono,
`MB ChB, FRCP, MSc, PhD, The Institute
`of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden
`NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Rd Sutton,
`Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom; e-mail:
`johann.de-bono@icr.ac.uk.
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical
`Oncology
`
`0732-183X/10/2809-1489/$20.00
`
`DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6819
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by 199.19.250.89 on December 20, 2016 from 199.019.250.089
`
`Copyright © 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1096 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Reid et al
`
`testosterone and dihydrotestosterone capable of AR activation. Estro-
`gens also are decreased, which may be important, as there is increasing
`evidence that they may increase the expression of hormone-regulated
`oncogenic ETS fusion genes.13
`Abiraterone (CB7598) is an oral, potent, selective, and irre-
`versible inhibitor of CYP17 that is 10- to 30-fold more potent
`than the nonselective inhibitor, ketoconazole. The parent drug
`has poor bioavailability; therefore, a prodrug was generated.14,15
`The 3-␤-O-acetate prodrug (ie, abiraterone acetate, CB7630) is rap-
`idly deacetylated to the active metabolite in vivo.14,15 In our recent,
`first-in-man, phase I evaluation of continuous daily abiraterone in
`chemotherapy-naïve men, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed,
`and—significantly—abiraterone acetate was well tolerated; moreover,
`abiraterone was active at all doses tested, as evidenced by prostate-
`specific antigen (PSA) declines, disease regression in both soft tissue
`and bone, and symptomatic improvements.5 This study reported that
`castrate, but detectable, testosterone levels at baseline declined rapidly
`to less than 1 ng/dL after treatment with abiraterone acetate.5 Com-
`patible with complete CYP17 inhibition, treatment with abiraterone
`acetate also decreases estradiol, dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA),
`and androstenedione. Increases in steroids upstream of CYP17, corti-
`costerone and deoxycorticosterone, reached a plateau at doses greater
`than 750 mg. A 1,000-mg dose, therefore, was selected for phase II
`evaluation. Pharmacokinetic testing confirmed a once-daily dosing
`schedule. Our phase II study in men who have not yet received chem-
`otherapy has confirmed that abiraterone is well tolerated and active in
`this setting.4
`As AR activation and signalling remain key targets in later stages
`of the disease, we hypothesized that postdocetaxel patients would
`derive benefit from abiraterone acetate. Therefore, we conducted a
`phase II study to evaluate the antitumor activity of abiraterone acetate
`1,000 mg administered daily, continuously, to castrate men with
`CRPC who had previously received docetaxel.
`
`PATIENTS AND METHODS
`
`Patient Population
`This was a multicenter, phase II study (COU-AA-003) conducted at the
`Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
`Center, and the University of California, San Francisco, Comprehensive Can-
`cer Center. Castrate (ie, serum testosterone ⬍ 50 ng/dL, ⬍ 2.0 nmol/L)
`patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance
`status (PS) 0 to 2 who had a histologic diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma,
`a PSA greater than 5 ng/mL, and progressive disease as defined by PSA Work-
`ing Group (PSAWG)16 criteria were eligible. Patients were permitted to be on
`stable low doses of steroids if the steroids were required to maintain fitness for
`the study. Patients were required to have a minimum washout period of 4
`weeks after the use of PCa therapy (except for luteinizing hormone-releasing
`hormone [LHRH] agonists) and were required to have 6 weeks of washout
`after antiandrogens were stopped. Patients were required to have received
`prior docetaxel chemotherapy for PCa. Other eligibility criteria included nor-
`mal serum potassium and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic func-
`tions. Patients were excluded if they had brain metastases or spinal cord
`compression, active autoimmune disease that required corticosteroid therapy,
`uncontrolled hypertension, a history of cardiac failure class III or IV, or a
`serious concurrent medical illness. The study was approved by the institutional
`ethics review committees of all participating centers and was conducted in
`accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference
`on Harmonisation/WHO Good Clinical Practice standards. Written in-
`
`formed consent was obtained from all patients before any study procedures
`were performed.
`
`Study Design and Response Assessment
`This was a single-arm, open-label, two-stage, phase II study. The primary
`objective of the study was to evaluate the antitumor activity of abiraterone
`acetate in patients with CRPC who had received prior docetaxel chemothera-
`py, and the primary end point was measured by the proportion of patients
`
`Table 1. Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
`
`Characteristic
`
`Age, years
`Median
`Range
`Gleason score
`⬍ 6
`6-7
`8-9
`10
`Unknown
`Baseline PSA, ng/mL
`Median
`Range
`ECOG performance status
`0
`1
`2
`Hemoglobin, g/dL
`Median
`Range
`Albumin, g/L
`Median
`Range
`Alkaline phosphatase, ␮/L
`Median
`Range
`Predominant metastases
`Bone only
`Visceral only
`Soft tissue only
`Bone and soft tissue
`Bone and visceral
`Soft tissue and visceral
`Bone, soft tissue, and visceral
`Prior hormone therapies
`LHRH analogues
`Antiandrogens
`Steroids
`Estrogens
`Ketoconazole
`Prior chemotherapy
`Docetaxel
`Vinorelbine
`ECarboF
`Mitoxantrone
`Cyclophosphamide
`Carboplatin
`Estramustine
`Paclitaxel
`
`No. of Patients
`
`67
`48-87
`
`4
`20
`17
`1
`5
`
`403
`9.9-10,325
`
`16
`27
`4
`
`11.8
`9.4-14.6
`
`36
`23-46
`
`185
`34-110
`
`4
`0
`1
`33
`1
`1
`7
`
`47
`46
`27
`17
`8
`
`47
`3
`1
`8
`2
`2
`2
`2
`
`Abbreviations: PSA, prostate specific antigen; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative
`Oncology Group; LHRH, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; ECarboF,
`carboplatin plus fluorouracil plus epirubicin.
`
`1490
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by 199.19.250.89 on December 20, 2016 from 199.019.250.089
`
`Copyright © 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1096 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Post-Docetaxel Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate
`
`achieving a PSA decline of ⱖ 50% from baseline, as recommended by PSAWG
`criteria.16 A confirmatory PSA value decline was obtained ⱖ 4 weeks later. For
`patients with a ⱖ 50% PSA decline from baseline, PSA progression was defined
`as an increase in PSA of 50% (minimum, 5 ng/mL) greater than nadir value
`and was confirmed by a second reading ⱖ 4 weeks later. For patients without
`a ⱖ 50% PSA decline from baseline, PSA progression was defined as an
`increase in PSA of 25% (minimum, 5 ng/mL) greater than nadir and was
`confirmed by a second reading a minimum of 4 weeks later (according to
`PSAWG). After this study was written, revised criteria for assessing re-
`sponse in prostate clinical trials has been published (ie, Prostate Cancer
`Clinical Trials Working Group) that recommends the reporting of the
`maximal PSA decline from baseline at 12 weeks and at any point on
`study.17 Measurable disease response rate, at least 3 months after the start
`of treatment per investigator’s assessment using Response Evaluation Cri-
`teria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), was reported. As conducted in our pre-
`vious chemotherapy-naı¨ve studies, ⱖ 30% and ⱖ 90% declines in PSA
`were also reported. The median time to PSA progression was defined
`according to the PSAWG criteria. Patients with PSA progression but stable
`measurable disease by RECIST and no symptoms of clinical progression
`were allowed to continue abiraterone acetate therapy and duration on
`study is therefore also reported.
`
`Treatment and Procedures
`Four capsules (250 mg each) of abiraterone acetate powder were admin-
`istered once daily, continuously, to patients in a fasted state in 28-day cycles. All
`patients underwent a history, physical exam, and safety evaluations that in-
`cluded hematology, coagulation, biochemistry, liver and renal function studies
`at baseline after the first week and at 4-week intervals. PSA, alkaline phospha-
`tase, and albumin levels were also measured. Adverse events were graded
`according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for
`Adverse Events, version 3.0. Expected toxicities of hypertension, hypoka-
`lemia, and fluid retention arising from a syndrome of secondary mineralo-
`corticoid excess were managed with either a mineralocorticoid receptor
`
`antagonist (eplerenone 50 to 200 mg) or low-dose glucocorticoids. Base-
`line high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans and bone scans
`were performed and repeated at 3-month and 6-month intervals, respec-
`tively. Patients were offered to sign an optional secondary protocol to have
`blood samples (7.5 mL) collected into CellSave tubes (Veridex LLC, Rari-
`tan, NJ) at baseline and every 4 weeks thereafter for the enumeration of
`CTC by using the CellSearch system (Veridex), as described previously.18
`Fluorescent in situ hybridization to investigate ERG gene status was per-
`formed on CTCs, as described previously.19,20
`
`Statistical Analyses
`The primary objective was to determine the rate of patients that demon-
`strated a ⱖ 50% decline in PSA. A two-stage, Green and Dahlberg, attained-
`phase II trial design was utilized that permitted additional patients to be
`recruited if sufficient activity was demonstrated in the second stage.21 By using
`a response rate of ⱕ 10% for the null hypothesis versus an alternative hypoth-
`esis response rate of ⱖ 30%, 20 patients were to be recruited to the first stage.
`If at least three of 20 patients had a PSA decline by ⱖ 50%, the study would
`proceed to the second stage, with an additional 13 patients recruited. The null
`hypothesis would be rejected if there were at least seven patients who had a PSA
`decline by ⱖ 50% (␣⫽ .05; ␤⫽ .01). As defined a priori in the trial protocol,
`all patients treated were included in the assessment of antitumor activity.
`Patients with at least five CTCs per 7.5mL at baseline were reported as to
`whether they had a decrease in CTC to less than five CTCs; a decrease by 50%;
`or a decrease by 30%.22-24
`
`RESULTS
`
`Patient Characteristics
`Forty-seven patients were enrolled from December 2006 to
`August 2007. Table 1 lists the patient demographic and clinical
`
`90%
`50%
`30%
`
`90%
`50%
`30%
`PSA value clipped
`
`Patient
`
`Patient
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`Maximal Respose (%)
`
`Week 12 PSA Response (%)
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Fig 1. Waterfall plots of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes. (A) Waterfall plot of greatest percentage change in PSA of individual patients on abiraterone acetate.
`(B) Waterfall plot of PSA change from baseline at 12 weeks for individual patients on abiraterone acetate. Brown, gold and gray lines indicate a decline in PSA of 30%,
`50% and 90%, respectively. Some patients had a PSA decline on study but this was short-lived; PSA then increased again, which explains why the week-12 and
`maximal PSA declines are different.
`
`www.jco.org
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`1491
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by 199.19.250.89 on December 20, 2016 from 199.019.250.089
`
`Copyright © 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1096 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Reid et al
`
`characteristics. Median age was 67 years (range, 48 to 87 years). All
`patients had experienced progression on LHRH agonists, and 46
`patients had received prior antiandrogens. The median numbers of
`prior hormonal therapies and prior chemotherapy agents were
`four and one, respectively. All patients had previously received
`steroid therapy with docetaxel; 27 (57%) of 47 patients also had
`received single-agent steroid treatment (ie, prednisone, dexameth-
`asone, or hydrocortisone), and 17 (36%) of 47 patients had re-
`ceived prior estrogens as well. Eight (17%) of 47 patients had
`received prior ketoconazole. Eighteen of 47 patients started the
`study on a stable dose of steroids to maintain PS. The median
`baseline PSA was 403 ng/mL (range, 9.9 to 10,325 ng/mL). Sixty-
`two percent of patients had an albumin of ⱕ 35 or 3.5 g/dL. Thirty
`patients had measurable disease on baseline CT scan. Overall, 45 of
`47 patients had evidence of bony metastases at baseline. Twenty-
`seven (79%) of 34 patients (who were in a seperate CTC acquisition
`protocol) had at least five CTCs at baseline; the median CTC count
`in the 27 patients with at least five CTCs at baseline was 36 (range,
`five to 1,712). Among patients with a CTC count of at least five at
`baseline, 14 (52%) of 27 patients had a count of five to 50 cells, and
`13 (48%) of 27 patients had a CTC count of greater than 50.
`
`47 patients and seven (15%) of 47 patients had ⱖ 30% and ⱖ 90%
`declines in PSA, respectively. These responses were confirmed at least
`4 weeks later with a second PSA except for 3 and 4 patients with PSA
`declines of ⱖ 50% and ⱖ 30% respectively for whom a confirmatory
`PSA four weeks later was not available. The percentage of change in
`PSA from baseline to 12 weeks and the maximum decline in PSA at
`any point on study are depicted for each patient in waterfall plots (Fig
`1).17 Thirty patients had measurable disease at baseline, and eight
`(27%) of 30 patients met the criteria for partial response (PR) by
`RECIST per investigator’s assessment (Fig 2).
`
`Symptomatic Improvements
`At baseline, 16 patients had an ECOG PS of 0; 27 patients had an
`ECOG PS of 1; and four patients had an ECOG PS of 2. An improvement
`in performance status was observed during treatment in 11 patients: 10
`patients shifted from ECOG 1 to ECOG 0, and one patient shifted from
`ECOG 2 to ECOG 1. ECOG PS did not change from baseline after
`treatment in 35 patients, as ECOG PS scores of 0, 1, and 2 remained
`unchanged in 15 of 16, 17 of 27, and three of four patients, respectively.
`
`Antitumor Activity: PSA Changes and Measurable
`Disease Responses
`A PSA decline of ⱖ 50% from the start of treatment was observed
`in 24 (51%) of 47 patients at least once on study. Thirty-two (68%) of
`
`Time to PSA Progression and Duration on Study
`The median time to PSA progression was 169 days (ie, 24 weeks;
`95% CI, 113 to 281 days; Fig 3). Five (10.6%) of 47 patients were on
`study fewer than 12 weeks; 18 (38.3%) of 47 patients were on study for
`12 to 23 weeks; 12 (25.5%) of 47 patients were on study 24 to 47 weeks;
`
`A
`
`C
`
`B
`
`D
`
`2C
`E
`
`2D
`F
`
`Fig 2. Radiologic responses. (A) Patient 010 had previously experienced progression on an luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, flutamide,
`bicalutamide, docetaxel, the monoclonal antibody to IGF-1R, CP-751, 871, and the survivin inhibitor YM155. Before starting treatment with abiraterone acetate, the
`prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 789, and there was evidence of nodal and bony metastatic disease. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were not detected. Red oval,
`retroperitoneal nodal disease on a baseline computed tomography (CT) scan (A). After 3 months on abiraterone acetate, PSA decreased to a nadir of 1.4 (ie, ⬎ 90%
`decline), and (B) the red oval shows that the nodal disease has largely disappeared. Patient 010 continues to take study drug, now in the third year of treatment. (C)
`Patient 025 had previously experienced progression on an LHRH agonist, antiandrogen, stilboestrol, and docetaxel. Baseline PSA was 10,325, and it decreased to a
`PSA nadir of 46 (ie, ⬎ 90% decline) after 4 months on abiraterone acetate. Baseline CTC count was 20, which decreased to a CTC count nadir of 0 after 4 weeks. Green
`oval, CT scan at baseline demonstrated an axillary nodal metastasis (C). Reduction in size is seen in a follow-up scan performed at 6 months (green oval; D). (E)
`Whole-body, 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy at baseline (again for patient 025). A response in the bony disease can be seen in (F) after 6 months on abiraterone acetate.
`This patient remained on study in excess of a year (ie, 482 days).
`
`1492
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by 199.19.250.89 on December 20, 2016 from 199.019.250.089
`
`Copyright © 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1096 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`Post-Docetaxel Phase II Trial of Abiraterone Acetate
`
`Median (days) 169 (95% CI, 113 to 281)
`
`Table 2. Incidence of Most Frequent Treatment-Related Adverse Events
`
`Patients by Event Grade (N ⫽ 47)
`
`Grade 1
`
`Grade 2
`
`Grade 3
`
`Grade 4
`
`Event
`
`No. % No. % No. % No. %
`
`Nausea
`Constipation
`Fatigue
`Peripheral edema
`Hypokalaemia
`Anorexia
`Hyperglycemia
`Headache
`Hypertension
`
`3
`1
`2
`2
`25
`4
`1
`3
`3
`
`6
`2
`4
`4
`53
`9
`2
`6
`6
`
`2
`4
`10
`5
`0
`4
`5
`2
`5
`
`4
`9
`21
`11
`
`9
`11
`4
`11
`
`2
`0
`3
`0
`1
`1
`0
`0
`0
`
`4
`
`6
`
`2
`2
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`1
`
`0.75
`
`0.5
`
`0.25
`
`Probability
`
`Censored
`
`0
`
`40 100 160 220 280 340 400 460 520 580 640 700 760 820
`Study Day
`
`Fig 3. Time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Median time to PSA
`progression is 169 days (95% CI, 113 to 281 days).
`
`NOTE. Treatment-related effects from abiraterone acetate or steroid treatment.
`Only events occurring in ⱖ 10% of patients are reported in this Table. One patient
`reported grade 4 increase in transaminases not shown in the Table.
`
`Safety
`All 47 patients were evaluable for adverse events. Abiraterone
`acetate was, in general, well tolerated. The expected and related toxic-
`ities of hypokalemia, hypertension, and fluid retention occurred in 26
`(55%), eight (17%), and seven (15%) patients, respectively, and were
`easily managed (eplerenone/low-dose glucocorticoids). Three deaths
`occurred on study. One patient developed pneumonia, and another
`patient developed progressive disease and deteriorated rapidly. Nei-
`ther of these deaths was considered related to study drug. The third
`patient, who had diabetes and a cardiac history, was admitted to
`hospital with groin pain at the site of extensive bony metastases.
`During the admission, he experienced chest discomfort and was
`treated for a possible upper respiratory tract infection. He had an
`asystolic cardiac arrest attributed to a myocardial infarct or pulmo-
`nary embolus. A postmortem was not conducted. Table 2 lists ad-
`verse events.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`This study in patients with late-stage metastatic CRPC who have
`received prior docetaxel treatment demonstrates that selective, irre-
`versible CYP17 inhibition with abiraterone acetate results in signifi-
`cant antitumor activity. The antitumor activity is in keeping with levels
`reported in our chemotherapy-naı¨ve studies4,5 and by Ryan et al25 in
`this issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). Declines in PSA of
`ⱖ 50% were seen in 51% of patients. PSA declines were supported by
`radiologic responses, improvement in symptoms, and CTC declines.
`Similar activity in this patient population is reported by Danila et al26
`in this issue of JCO. Overall, these results suggest that a significant
`proportion of CRPC remains hormone driven after docetaxel treat-
`ment, which supports therapeutic targeting of the AR and AR signal-
`ing in this population. These data led to the development of an 1,158
`patient registration phase III trial of prednisone with either abi-
`raterone acetate or placebo in a 2:1 random assignment in docetaxel-
`treated patients, for which overall survival was the primary end point
`(ie, NCT00638690). The CTC data in this phase II study led to the
`incorporation of CTC count evaluation into the phase III trial to
`establish whether the impact of treatment on CTC count can serve as
`
`and 12 (25.5%) of 47 patients remained on study at least 48 weeks. At the
`time of data cutoff (ie, May 2009), five patients continued on abiraterone
`acetate (⫹913, ⫹886, ⫹795, ⫹726, ⫹698 days, respectively).
`
`Declines in CTC Count
`After treatment with abiraterone acetate was started, 11 (41%) of
`27 patients had a decline in CTC count from five or greater to less than
`five. Seventeen (63%) of 27 patients had a decline in CTC count by
`ⱖ 50%, and 18 (67%) of 27 patients had a decline in CTC count
`by ⱖ 30% after starting treatment with abiraterone acetate. CTC
`count declines from five or greater to less than 5 and declines of 50%
`and 30% have been associated previously with improved overall
`survival.22-24 One of 27 patients with a CTC count of ⱖ 5 only had a
`baseline reading. A waterfall plot of maximal percentage CTC count
`decline on abiraterone acetate is shown in Figure 4. Maximal change in
`CTC count did not correlate with maximal PSA change (r ⫽ 0.093;
`P ⫽ .762 by Pearson Rho test) in the population as a whole. However,
`for patients with ERG gene–rearranged tumors, PSA and CTC count
`declines were significantly correlated (r⫽ 0.762; P ⫽ .001); conversely,
`PSA and CTC count declines were not correlated for patients with
`ERG gene–unrearranged disease (r ⫽ 0.493; P ⫽ .010; Appendix Fig
`A1, online only).
`
`Patients
`
`20
`10
`0
`-10
`-20
`-30
`-40
`-50
`-60
`-70
`-80
`-90
`-100
`
`Maximal CTC Change (%)
`
`Fig 4. Waterfall plot of maximal circulating tumor cell (CTC) count declines in
`individual patients on abiraterone acetate. Twenty-six patients are featured in the
`plot as 1/27 patients with ⱖ 5 CTCs only had a baseline measurement. Brown,
`gold and gray lines indicate a decline in CTC count of 30%, 50% and 90%
`respectively. Red dots indicate clipped CTC count values.
`
`www.jco.org
`
`© 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`1493
`
`Downloaded from ascopubs.org by 199.19.250.89 on December 20, 2016 from 199.019.250.089
`
`Copyright © 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1096 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`Reid et al
`
`an intermediate end point of overall survival in CRPC. Concordance
`was seen between PSA and CTC for patients with ERG gene–rear-
`ranged disease but not for patients without an ERG gene rearrange-
`ment. As ERG gene rearrangements and PSA production are hormone
`regulated, one might expect that PSA should more accurately reflect a
`therapeutic effect and be concordant with CTC counts in the patients
`with ERG gene–rearranged disease. These data, albeit preliminary and
`in small numbers, are in keeping with the mechanism of action of
`abiraterone acetate.
`The patients recruited to this study had many poor prognostic
`features, including the following: albumin ⱕ 35 or 3.5 g/dL (62%);
`PS of ⱖ 1 (66%); and CTC count of at least five (79%).22-24,27 All of
`these patients had disease that was resistant to most standard and
`some experimental lines of therapy. Specifically, all patients had re-
`ceived docetaxel, the only agent to have shown a survival benefit in
`this group.3
`Importantly, despite the more advanced stage of the disease and
`the poorer patient PS, the adverse events seen in these post-docetaxel
`patients were similar to those in our recently reported phase I and II
`pre-docetaxel studies (N ⫽ 54 patients) of abiraterone acetate.4,5 As
`reported in our previous phase I experience, no hypoadrenalism was
`seen. Hypokalemia, hypertension, and fluid retention—all expected
`toxicities that occur because of increased adrenocorticotrophic hor-
`mone and a resultant excess of mineralocorticoid steroids upstream of
`CYP17—were effectively managed with a mineralocorticoid receptor
`antagonist or a low-dose of glucocorticoid.
`This study provides additional evidence that selective CYP17
`inhibition with abiraterone acetate in postdocetaxel patients with
`CRPC is well tolerated and has significant antitumor activity. These
`results highlight the continued importance of the AR axis, even in the
`most advanced stages of the disease, and warrant phase III confirmation.
`
`AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS
`OF INTEREST
`
`Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following
`author(s) indicated a financial or other interest that is relevant to the subject
`
`matter under consideration in this article. Certain relationships marked
`with a “U” are those for which no compensation was received; those
`relationships marked with a “C” were compensated. For a detailed
`description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about
`ASCO’s conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure
`Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in
`Information for Contributors.
`Employment or Leadership Position: Thian Kheoh, Cougar
`Biotechnology (C); Arturo Molina, Cougar Biotechnology (C)
`Consultant or Advisory Role: Alison H.M. Reid, Cougar Biotechnology
`(U); Gerhardt Attard, Cougar Biotechnology (U); Daniel C. Danila,
`Cougar Biotechnology (U); Leon W.M.M. Terstappen, Veridex (C); Eric
`Small, Cougar Biotechnology (C); Howard I. Scher, Cougar
`Biotechnology (C), Veridex LLC (U); Johann S. de Bono, Cougar
`Biotecnology (U) Stock Ownership: Thian Kheoh, Cougar
`Biotechnology; Arturo Molina, Cougar Biotechnology Honoraria: None
`Research Funding: Howard I. Scher, Veridex, Cougar Biotechnology
`Expert Testimony: None Other Remuneration: None
`
`AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
`
`Conception and design: Alison H.M. Reid, Johann S. de Bono
`Financial support: Arturo Molina
`Administrative support: Gloria Lee, Thian Kheoh, Arturo Molina
`Provision of study materials or patients: Alison H.M. Reid, Gerhardt
`Attard, Daniel C. Danila, Nikhil Babu Oommen, David Olmos, Peter C.
`Fong, L. Rhoda Molife, Joanne Hunt, Christopher Parker, David Dearnaley,
`Charles J. Ryan, Eric Small, Howard I. Scher, Johann S. de Bono
`Collection and assembly of data: Alison H.M. Reid, Gerhardt Attard,
`Daniel C. Danila, Nikhil Babu Oommen, David Olmos, Peter C. Fong, L.
`Rhoda Molife, Joanne Hunt, Christina Messiou, Joost F. Swennenhuis, Leon
`W.M.M. Terstappen, Thian Kheoh, Charles J. Ryan, Johann S. de Bono
`Data analysis and interpretation: Alison H.M. Reid, David Olmos,
`Thian Kheoh, Johann S. de Bono
`Manuscript writing: Alison H.M. Reid, Johann S. de Bono
`Final approval of manuscript: Alison H.M. Reid, Gerhardt Attard,
`Daniel C. Danila, Nikhil Babu Oommen, David Olmos, Peter C. Fong, L.
`Rhoda Molife, Joanne Hunt, Christina Messiou, Christopher Parker,
`David Dearnaley, Joost F. Swennenhuis, Leon W.M.M. Terstappen,
`Gloria Lee, Thian Kheoh, Arturo Molina, Charles J. Ryan, Eric Small,
`Howard I. Scher, Johann S. de Bono
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epide-
`miology and End Results. www.seer.cancer.gov
`2. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al: Estimates
`of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in
`2006. Ann Oncol 18:581-592, 2007
`3. Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al: Do-
`cetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus pred-
`nisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med
`351:1502-1512, 2004
`4. Attard G, Reid AH, A’Hern R, et al: Selective
`inhibition of CYP17 with abiraterone acetate is
`highly active in the treatment of castration-resistant
`prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:3742-3748, 2009
`5. Attard G, Reid AH, Yap TA, et al: Phase I
`clinical trial of a selective inhibitor of CYP17, abi-
`raterone acetate, confirms that castration-resistant
`prostate cancer commonly remains hormone driven.
`J Clin Oncol 26:4563-4571, 2008
`6. Attard G, Sarker D, Reid A, et al: Improving
`the outcome of patients with castration-resistant
`prostate cancer through rational drug development.
`Br J Cancer 95:767-774, 2006
`
`7. Holzbeierlein J, Lal P, LaTulippe E, et al: Gene
`expression analysis of human prostate carcinoma
`during hormonal
`therapy
`identifies
`androgen-
`responsive genes and mechanisms of therapy resis-
`tance. Am J Pathol 164:217-227, 2004
`8. Stanbrough M, Bubley GJ, Ross K, et al:
`Increased expression of genes converting adrenal
`androgens to testosterone in androgen-independent
`prostate cancer. Cancer Res 66:2815-2825, 2006
`9. Mohler JL, Gregory CW, Ford OH 3rd, et al:
`The androgen axis in recurrent prostate cancer. Clin
`Cancer Res 10:440-448, 2004
`10. Montgomery RB, Mostaghel EA, Vessella R,
`et al: Maintenance of intratumoral androgens in
`meta

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket