throbber
Duration of Therapy For Oral Treatments
`in Patients With Metastatic Castration
`Resistant Prostate Cancer
`N. M. Engel-Nitz, PhD,1 A. S. Behl, PhD, MBA2, C. Blauer-Peterson, MPH1, N. A. Dawson, MD3
`1Optum, Eden Prairie, MN; 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, MA: 3Georgetown University Hospital
`Background
`Results
`Patient Characteristics
`§ Abiraterone acetate (ABI) with prednisone and enzalutamide (ENZ) are oral
`treatments for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
`§ Average age was 74 years (ENZ) and 73 years (ABI,P<0.05); Charlson
`(mCRPC).
`comorbidity scores were 6.4 (ENZ) and 5.9 (ABI), (P<0.001).
`Table 1. Patient Characteristics
`§ The literature suggests that the sequence in which these therapies are used
`may drive development of cross-resistance, potentially costing patients in
`terms of the effectiveness of subsequent treatments in the event of failure of
`the initial treatment.1
`§ However, there is little evidence on whether sequencing of therapy
`influences overall duration of therapy and subsequent outcomes, particularly
`progression to end-of-life care.
`Objective
`§ This study compared real-world duration of therapy and hospice use
`among patients initiated on ABI and ENZ.
`Methods
`Data Source and Study Design:
`§ Optum’s health claims database was used to conduct a retrospective study.
`The database includes commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with a
`national geographic distribution, with approximately 53 million unique
`individuals with medical and pharmacy coverage.
`Figure 1. Study Design
`
`ABI
`(N=1,095)
`Mean (Std. Dev)
`72.87 (9.32)
`5.92 (2.03)
`%
`17.63
`31.05
`39.27
`12.05
`%
`34.25
`65.75
`
`ENZ
`(N=421)
`Mean (Std. Dev)
`74.44 (9.46)
`6.35 (2.09)
`%
`18.29
`32.54
`38.48
`10.69
`%
`29.69
`70.31
`
`Characteristic
`
`Age (years)*
`Charlson Comorbidity Score**
`Region
`Northeast
`Midwest
`South
`West
`Insurance Type
`Commercial
`Medicare Advantage
`*P<0.05; **P<0.001
`Treatment Duration
`§ Average duration of treatment was 320 days (ABI) and 260 days (ENZ),
`P<0.001. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis found a higher
`hazard of discontinuing treatment for ENZ vs. ABI (HR: 1.25; 95%
`confidence limits: 1.02, 1.52; P=0.032).
`Table 2. Treatment Patterns
`
`Measure
`
`Total days treated with ABI or ENZ**
`Duration of treatment: Time to ABI+ENZ
`treatment end (days)**
`Cox proportional hazards results, adjusted
`for demographics and clinical
`characteristics
`Discontinuation of treatment*
`
`*P<0.05; **P<0.001
`
`ABI
`(N=1,095)
`Mean (Std. Dev)
`293 (204)
`320 (220)
`
`ENZ
`(N=421)
`Mean (Std. Dev)
`240(166)
`260 (184)
`
`Hazard Ratio
`(ENZ vs. ABI
`reference)
`1.25
`
`[95% LCL, 95%
`UCL]
`
`[1.02, 1.52]
`
`Inclusion Criteria: Patients included in the study met the following criteria:
`§ Male patients (age 18+)
`§ Newly initiated on ABI or ENZ from 09/01/2012 to 06/30/2015;
`• Index date was identified as the date of first medication (ABI or ENZ)
`initiated.
`• Patients were excluded if they had claims for ABI or ENZ during 6-months
`prior to index date.
`§ ≥1 non-diagnostic claim with a prostate cancer diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 185.xx)
`from 6 months pre- through 30 days post-index date
`§ ≥6 pre-index and ≥3 months post-index health plan enrollment; patients were
`retained if follow-up shorter than 3 months was due to death.
`Variables
`§ Cohorts (ABI, ENZ) were based on the first medication initiated at index
`date.
`§ Duration of therapy with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide was
`assessed as time from index date until the last date of all abiraterone
`acetate or enzalutamide treatment; this period includes treatment with other
`(switched) medications and gaps in therapy. In addition, total days treated
`were calculated as the sum of days supply from filled prescriptions for
`abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide.
`§ Hospice use was measured in medical claims based on procedures codes
`for hospice services and site of service codes; time from index date to first
`evidence of hospice, and time from hospice to death were measured.
`§ Mortality was assessed using the Social Security Master Death file, patient
`facility discharge status, and use of hospice services with subsequent health
`plan disenrollment.
`§ Enrollment data were used to identify age, insurance type, and geographic
`region of residence. Clinical characteristics were measured from medical
`and pharmacy claims, including Charlson Comorbidity Score2, bone/brain
`metastases, docetaxel, and pre- and post-index statin use.
`Analytic Methods
`§ Descriptive analyses compared ABI and ENZ on characteristics and
`outcomes; t-tests for means and chi-square tests for dichotomous variables.
`§ Cox proportional hazards compared ABI and ENZ on duration of therapy,
`with models adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics.
`§ Time to hospice and time from entering hospice until death were evaluated.
`References
`
`1. Sartor O, Gillessen S. Treatment sequencing in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Asian J Androl.
`2014 May-Jun; 16(3): 426–431.
`2. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali
`WA, Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Medical Care.
`2005;43:1130-39.
`
`Figure 2. Discontinuation of Medication
`
`Hospice Use Patterns
`§ Hospice was used by 14.8% of ABI and 12.6% of ENZ cohort patients
`(P=0.270). Patients started hospice an average of 307 days (ABI) and
`234 days (ENZ) after initiating index treatment (P=0.024); patients died an
`average of 43 days (ABI) and 38 days (ENZ) after starting hospice
`(P=0.620).
`Figure 3. Time to Hospice and Death after starting Hospice
`
`ENZ
`
`ABI
`
`234
`
`38
`
`307
`
`Days to Hospice
`Days to Death
`43
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`150
`
`200
`
`250
`
`0
`50
`100
`Conclusions
`Patients with mCRPC who were initiated on ABI first were less likely to
`discontinue treatment, had longer time on treatment, and longer time to
`starting hospice compared with patients initiated on ENZ. These outcomes
`may serve as proxies for delayed progression or increased survival.
`Disclosure
`
`Funding for this study was provided to Optum by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Dr. Engel-Nitz
`and Ms. Blauer-Peterson are employees of Optum and stockholders of UnitedHealth Group.
`Dr. Behl is an employee and stockholder of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Dr. Dawson has
`consulted to Janssen.
`
`An electronic version of the poster can be viewed by scanning the QR code.
`The QR code is intended to provide scientific information for individual
`reference. The PDF should not be altered or reproduced in any way.
`
`Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Nexus 2016, National Harbor, MD, USA; October 3-6, 2016
`
`JANSSEN EXHIBIT 2130
`Mylan v. Janssen IPR2016-01332
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket