throbber
IN MICE,
`THE SERUM CONCENTRATION OF PENICILLIN
`RABBITS, AND MEN AFTER ITS INTRAMUSCULAR
`INJECTION IN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
`
`HARRY EAGLE, RALPH FLEISCHMAN, AND A. D. MUSSELMAN
`
`Laboratory of Experimental Therapeutics of the U. S. Public Health Service and the Johns
`Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore 5, Maryland
`
`Received for publication October 13, 1948
`
`The serum levels of penicillin G in man after its intramuscular injection in
`aqueous solution or peanut-oil-beeswax suspension have been described in a pre-
`ceding paper (Tucker and Eagle, 1948). Similar data are here reported with
`respect to the plasma levels afiorded by the intramuscular injection of aqueous
`penicillin G in mice and rabbits.
`
`METHODS AND MATERIALS
`
`The solutions were injected intramuscularly into the thigh, in a volume of 1 ml
`per kg in rabbits, and in 0.2-ml volume in mice.
`In the latter species the injec-
`tion was partially subcutaneous, because of leakage from the muscle into the sur-
`rounding tissues. The courtesy of the manufacturers in supplying the penicillin
`G used in these studies (Squibb lot numbers V-31, CRA214-20, and 17579, and
`Commercial Solvents lot number 46042605) is gratefully acknowledged.
`The method of assay was a serial dilution technique in which inhibition of
`hemolysis by the C-203 strain of Streptococcus pyogenes was the end point (Ram-
`melkamp, 1942; Kirby and Rantz, 1944). The details of the method have been
`given elsewhere (Eagle and Newman, 1947).
`In the assays of human and rabbit
`serum, the data have been corrected for the inhibitory effect of serum in the assay
`(Eagle, l947a,b; Tompsett, Schultz, and McDermott, 1947a,b), using the cor-
`rective factors as experimentally determined for human serum (Eagle and
`Tucker, 1948) and since found to be valid also for rabbit serum. No corrective
`factors have been applied to the mouse data. The values in which, because of
`the high concentration of serum in the indicator tube, that correction would
`probably have been significant are indicated in the tables.
`It is a pleasure to acknowledge our indebtedness to Mr. Nathan Mantel, of the
`Ofiice of Statistical Coordinator, Division of Public Health Methods, for his
`assistance in the calculation of the probable errors of the median serum levels.
`
`EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
`
`Figure 1 and the first section of table 1, showing the results obtained in man,
`are here reproduced in modified form‘ from a previous paper (Tucker and Eagle,
`
`1 In the previous communication (Tucker and Eagle, 1948) the standard deviation given
`in the tables was a measure of the variability of the data about the median, as calculated by
`
`the formula (0 ==
`
`Ed’ med) and the standard error given was calculated by the for-
`
`119
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isanfiliq9|,0Z‘E51,Jequieidasuo/5Jo'uJse'q_f//:d1J,quJoJ,tpepeo|u/vxog
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 1
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. V. Astrazeneca AB lPR2016-01326
`
`

`
`120
`
`H. EAGLE, R. FLEISCHMAN, AND A. D. MUSSELMAN
`
`[von 57
`
`1948) in order to facilitate comparison between the results obtained in the 3
`species. Figure 2 and the second section of table 1 show the median serum
`levels in rabbits after the injection of penicillin G at 60, 10, 3, 1, and 0.6 mg per
`kg. Figure 3 and the last section of table 1 give the median serum concentra-
`tions obtained in mice similarly injected.
`In general, the initial blood levels, 15 or 30 minutes after the injection, varied '
`more or less linearly with the amount of penicillin injected.
`In figure 4, the
`.»
` .,v
`unit
`W
`
`
`Penicillin G in Man
`Aqueous solution
`injected inlromusculorly
`
`o
`
` HIIEHIIIIIIEIIIII
`
`
`SERUMCONCENTRATIONOFPENlClLLlN(Corrected
`
`forSerumErrorinAssay)
`
`0' 3 IIOIIVI
`
`<o.os Me
`\
`D
`-‘
`O ‘ \\ at 8 hours
`-°_
`° 0
`
`
`\<o.o3 '//cc
`at 4 hours
`
`Z
`3
`
`Figure 1. The serum concentrations of penicillin G in man after its intramuscular injec-
`tion in aqueous solution at varying dosage.
`(After Tucker and Eagle, 1948; cf. footnote 1.)
`
`TIME IN HOURS
`
`15-minute concentrations in man are approximations only, obtained by the
`extrapolation of the curves of figure 1. These initial values were of the same
`order of magnitude in rabbits and mice, but in man were 3 to 5 times higher.
`This is indicative of a significant species difference, either in the amount of body
`
`Tl
`mula S.E. = ‘f;_, and is a measure of the reliability of the variability measure c. Of
`greater significance as a measure of the reliability of the median itself is its standard error,
`given by the formula S.E. med. = 1.25 - It is the latter value that is indicated
`n n —
`in all the figures and tables of this paper, including the human data of figure 1 and table 1.
`
`
`
`
`
`isenfi/iq91,03‘E51,Jequieidasuo/5J0'u.lSl2'C|_l//Id11L|uJoJ,1pepeo|u/v\o(]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 2
`
`

`
`1949]
`
`SERUM CONCENTRATION or PENICILLIN G
`
`121
`
`
`
`
`
`2.3333»naeusua5.S.:8...=.u.E~»8§.Ec.a=.»3“.guns:“SeasE3.$.=.e§.53:em.6:.£H8.§uawe2S.£u.§$38uEatenShhumama.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an:2.:3.3»=2:3=2.:3mwwwuw§<£§afiwa
`
`VVV«S6HwwO.o.aNO.cHNH.O2SN25VVHNwoO®N0.0H#~.OmNo.cHhm.OcmcanM6V«VtoOHNmdm8.0H3.0m.n.OHma.Oon§.H0.0VmécdHemoé3...HMdmN.oH#4Nh.oHw.N3K5;m;VawcéH©N.O9.6HNN..nmm.OHm.mwmdHw.wOHo8.mMwadHowedwadH.5...2.5H¢.m«AH.3MAHha2$932$2
`
`95....»MVWeH58.9hvdHmudmm...HVJ.m.—H#6Mm.oHfin5+58.2SmN©HMaoOadHwad.nmHm.m.h.mH8w.»Hmmw.N~H«w395.9:8«Beam
`no.0H8.68.9HNN.ONH.oHfimto56H.madmi.58;HVamodH:862.:Hfie~.N.OHc455H34$6Hw.Nhlfi
`
`VV$.85H89..35.:H«H68.6H@N.cjmmdH$5SumQ5...“eoV95.6HNNO6
`
`
`
`himhghm.nVVVH®N0.0Hmw0.0NmO.cHm.oMdHméInSodmVV“ScOHm.Nc.¢8.:HwN.o_NméHw.NNHSmum58.3OHV88...H3.68OHmN.owadHMMMK.HMN«flu.H«A.Gun8:628V$59.6H2OSW6HM6hHHm.N2Hmm5Hc28HRNSum§.mmmGON._.om=oH>H
`vvv38...H:o.S.8.cH:.oN;H3...“5_e8;3.VVVHmficdHw0.0w8.cHm:.ONmO.oHm.©.Ofl
`
`
`
`.1:SnmSa..mo.8_Smod.8nomzrsaoouoeAvuaoohcova3c>__:m:omEon:mannamouoflufiuauzosuam«E.3nzmofiomofiasmnofiowoz_.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fleanA<nz<u.man3.:nuna:<u...o~ul.vZO~.n<lHZnDzOOlbuum5.33..3HU<mOQ
`
`
`,.w~»%.~um%..mfiuumm
`
`
`
`MO.62
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`..Bu_o=_H.vnaw—MdM_..Q3hamma25GmEganweuovuvhuoumnmaamQua.5“uuuuoicoameneonaka:935am£33nzmflnwmEAR.._.Jaaummawmnnoon9:3.n3.3o.=m2:9383$moSommeE3335.8.“mnosuohoo€23Emw3.a>mam.HAwvmu
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Uosiomqma:03::_oéU.mm3.o6\o:mm_o.nm3Uma.6.No.53ocmmfi
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 3
`
`
`

`
`CONCENTRATIONOF -—2
`-0.l.lI,l|II/lFEI’!lIII
`
`llllllllllol1|!"4‘,4V’I’A
`‘il:lililIr'' B4
`
`(commaforserumEmuInAssay)
`
`SERUM
`
`-
`.’l
`
`o
`
`%;
`
`122
`
`H. EAGLE, R. FLEISCEMAN, AND A. D. MUSSELMAN
`
`[voL. 57
`
`fluid over which the penicillin is initially distributed, or in the rate of that dis-
`tribution.
`
`In
`After the initial period of rapid absorption, the blood levels fell off rapidly.
`rabbits this rate of decrease averaged 65 per cent each hour, so that the residual
`serum concentration at time t was k X 0.35‘, in which t is the time in hours over
`the period of experimental observation, and k is a constant determined by the
`amount of penicillin injected.
`In man, the rate of fall was less consistent, the
`percentage drop per hour over the first 2 hours varying from 65 at the larger
`
`OIIIIII
`
`‘
`
`60 mg /kg of penicillin G
`Intromusculorly
`
`2
`
`3
`IN
`
`TIME
`
`HOURS
`
`4
`
`6
`
`_Fz'g_ure 2. The serum concentrations of penicillin G in rabbits_after its intramuscular
`inyection in aqueous solution at varying dosage. The dashed portion of the curve at 3 mg
`per kg by-passes the low value at 2 hours.
`
`In mice, however,
`doses to approximately 80 per cent at the smaller (figure 1).
`the blood levels during the first 2 hours fell olfat the extraordinary rate of 91
`to 99 per cent per hour (figure 3). At the largest dosage of 200 mg per kg, a
`slower rate of fall developed after several hours. This probably reflects a re-
`versal in the direction of flow of penicillin out of the tissue reservoir established
`by its initial distribution and back into the blood.
`The serum concentrations provided by a given dose of penicillin were usually
`3 to 5 times higher in man than they were in rabbits similarly injected. Al-
`though the concentrations in rabbits and mice began at the same level, they
`rapidly diverged because of the faster disappearance of penicillin in mice. These
`species diflerences are illustrated for a single dosage of penicillin in figure 5.
`
`
`
`
`
`isenfi/(q91,03‘E51,Jequieidasuo/5J0'LUSl2'C|_l//Id11l.|uJoJ,1pepeo|u/v\o(]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 4
`
`

`
`1949]
`
`snmm CONCENTRATION or PENICILLIN G
`
`123
`
`In the therapeutic use of penicillin, one of the most important single factors is
`the length of time for which the tissue levels of penicillin remain at effectively
`bactericidal levels. When the three species were compared on this basis (figure
`6), a given serum level was sustained approximately 50 per cent longer in man
`than it was in rabbits similarly injected.
`In large part this reflects the initially
`higher concentrations provided in man.
`In turn, the levels were sustained
`
`mg/|io'o1 penicillin G
`inmmuleulavly
`
`PENICILLIN
`
`OF
`
`
`
`SERUMCONCENTRATION
`
`
`
`
`
`(No!correctedforserumErrorinAssay)
`
`TIME
`
`IN
`
`HOURS
`
`Figure 3. The serum concentrations of penicillin G in mice after its intramuscular in
`jection in aqueous solution at varying dosage. Unlike the man and rabbit data of figures
`1 and 2, the data in this figure have not been corrected for the inhibitory efiect of serum in
`the assay. That would robably have been significant only for the two values indicated
`by the symbol :3: in the gum.
`
`approximately 3 times longer in rabbits than they were in mice because of the
`faster rate of fall in the latter species. Thus, as is indicated in figure 6, a dose of
`0.6 mg per kg provided serum levels in excess of, e.g., 0.1 microgram per ml for
`0.5, 1.4, and 2.3 hours in mice, rabbits, and men, respectively; and after a dose
`of 10 mg per kg the corresponding time periods were 1.4, 3.9, and 6.6 hours.
`In
`order to prolong by 1 hour the time for which this level of 0.1 microgram per ml
`would be maintained in the serum, the dosage of penicillin would have to be
`approximately doubled in man, and multiplied approximately 3-fold in rabbits,
`
`
`
`
`
`isenfi/iq91,03‘E51,Jequleidasuo/5J0'u.lSl2'C|_l//Id11l.|uJoJ,1pepeo|u/v\o(]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 5
`
`

`
`124
`
`H. EAGLE, R. FLEISCEMAN, mp A. D. MUSSELMAN
`
`[voL. 57
`
`whereas a 5- to 20-fold increase would be necessary in mice, depending on the
`dosage range (figure 6).
`The factors responsible for the relatively rapid disappearance of penicillin
`from mouse blood are as yet unknown. An important consideration may be the
`
`SERUMCONCENTRATIONOFPENICILLINAFTERI5MINUTES,MIOROGRAMS
`
`/‘ml
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`one
`
`0.3
`
`0.6
`
`1
`
`3
`
`no
`
`9
`
`'
`
`so
`
`zoo
`
`DOSAGE OF PENIOILLIN G, M0 [K9
`Figure 4. The effect of the amount of penicillin injected intramuscularly on the initial
`(15-minute) serum concentration in man, mouse, and rabbit. Human data obtained by
`extrapolation of curves in figure 1.
`
`renal clearance of penicillin, which in this species may be higher relative to body
`weight than it is in either rabbits or man (Eagle and Newman, 1947).
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Data are given for the median serum concentrations of penicillin G after its
`intramuscular injection in aqueous solution in men, rabbits, and mice at doses of
`0.6, 1 (1.5), 3, 10, 60, and 200 mg per kg. For equal doses of penicillin the serum
`levels at a given time were in the order man > rabbit > mouse.
`The initial (15- to 30-minute) level in man was 3 to 5 times greater than it was
`
`
`
`
`
`isenfi/(q91,03‘E51,Jequleidasuo/5J0'LUSl2'C|_l//Id11l.|uJoJ,1pepeo|u/v\o(]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`isenfi/(q91,03‘E51,Jequieidasuo/5J0'LUSl2'C|_l//Id11l.|uJoJ,1pepeo|u/v\o(]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10 mg I kg
`lnmmusculorly
`
`
`
`SERUMCONCENTRATIONOFPENICILLING,MICROGRAMSPERml
`
`I/4 «/2
`
`I
`
`A
`
`2
`
`4
`
`TIME
`
`IN
`
`HOURS
`
`Figyre 6: 'I_‘he co1_1t1_-asting cnrves of the serum penicillin concentration in men, rabbits,
`and mice similarly injected with penicillin G.
`
`
`
`A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ROURSFORWHICHSERUMCONCENTRATIONREMAINED
`
`
`
`
`
`GREATERTHAN0.!MICROGRAMSPERml
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lII-,PI’A-
`-II’;
`-II,vA 41,74
`‘I592 A-
`Eflifl A1
`lifl
`
`
`
`.3
`
`0.6
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`DOSAGE OF PENICILLIN G, MILLIGRAMS PER Kg
`
`Figure 6'. The time for which varying dosages of penicillin G_ p_rovide serum concentr§.-
`tions in excess of 0.1 microgram per ml. The value for man injected at 3 mg per kg is
`an approximation only, obtained by extrapolation of the curve in figure 1.
`125
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 7
`
`

`
`126
`
`H. EAGLE, R. FLEISCEMAN, Am) A. n. MUSSELMLAN
`
`[voL. 57
`
`in mice or rabbits, indicative of a significant species diflerence in the initial dis-
`tribution of the drug in the body fluids.
`Thereafter, penicillin disappeared from the serum of rabbits at the rate of 65
`per cent an hour, and somewhat faster in man.
`In mice, however, it fell off at a
`much faster initial rate, varying between 91 and 99 per cent an hour.
`In consequence of these differences in the initial distribution of penicillin and ‘
`its subsequent rate of disappearance from the serum, the time for which a given
`dosage of penicillin provided a measurable serum concentration was in the order
`1 :3 :4i- in mouse, rabbit, and man, respectively.
`To prolong a given serum level by 1 hour would require approximately a 2-fold
`increase in dosage in man, a 3-fold increase in rabbit, but a 5- to 20-fold increase
`in mice.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1947:: The inactivation of penicillins F, G, K, and X by human and rabbit
`EAGLE, H.
`serum. J. Exptl. Med., 85, 141-161.
`EAGLE, H.
`1947b The varying blood levels afforded by penicillins F, G, K and X in rabbits
`and man. J. Exptl. Med., 85, 163-173.
`EAGLE, H., AND NEWMAN, E. V.
`1947 The renal clearance of penicillins F, G, K and X in
`rabbits and man. J. Clin. Investigation, 26, 903-918.
`EAGLE, H., AND Tucxmn, H. A.
`1948 The eflect of human serum on the dilution biosssay
`of penicillins G, X, and K.
`J. Bact., 56, 59-62.
`Kmnv, W. M., AND R.AN'rz, L. A.
`1944 Methods of measuring penicillin concentrations
`in body fluids.
`J. Bact., 48, 603.
`RAmmLxAm>, C. H.
`1942 A method for determining the concentration of penicillin in
`body fluids and exudates. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 51, 95.
`Toupsm-r, R., Scmmrz, 8., AND McDmnuo-rr, W.
`1947a The relation of protein-binding
`to the pharmacology and antibacterial activity of penicillins X, G, dihydro F, and K.
`J. Bact., 53. 581-595.
`Influence of protein-binding
`1947b
`Toursnrr, R., Scnuurz, S., AND McDano*r'r, W.
`on the interpetation of penicillin activity in viva. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 65.
`163-172.
`1948 The serum concentrations of penicillin G in man
`Tucxnn, H. A., AND EAGLE, H.
`following its intramuscular injection in aqueous solution and in peanut oil-beeswax
`suspension. Am. J. Med., 4, 343-354.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`isenfi/(q91,03‘E51,Jequieidasuo/6Jo'uJse'q_f//:d11quJoJ,1pepeo|u/v\o(]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2129 p. 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket