throbber
In
`
`I
`
`“
`H.
`Ll um 7.1 m;<J;1I1I(( )1 ml
`
`n%
`[ . H T??? ‘H £113;@UI1IW I
`
`,'\«u
`
`I K
`
`,r]! )~__\,"‘/1*‘
`
`4
`
`\_
`
`I,‘
`
`I
`
`'5 3
`
`‘
`k
`
`_‘z;"!_.V (L,
`ifI_':'-
`‘
`],\1_'V|"_¢‘1l:‘I.f-"
`I _
`{J[}\\1;i§']ij;i_iHlLl,_!I‘fl_ J a"‘«J!(iI‘ L1 %_U__a |_(_IL-_1:_1I.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`18TH %'K
`
`EDITION
`
`’
`
`Bxemington s
`
`ALFONSO R GENNARO
`Editor, and Chairman
`of the Editorial Board
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 2
`
`

`
`1 990
`
`MACK PUBLISHING COMPANY
`
`Eoston, Pennsylvania 18042
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1885 by Joseph P Remington,
`in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington DC
`
`Copyright 1389, 1894, 1905, 1907, 1917, by Joseph P Remington
`
`Copyright 1926, 1936, by Joseph P Remington Estate
`Copyright 1948, 1951, by The Philadelphia College of Pharmacy and Science
`
`Copyright G) 1956, 1960, 1965. 1970, 1975, 1980. 1985. 1990, by The Philadelphia College of
`Pharmacy and Science
`.
`
`Ail Rights Reserved
`
`Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 60-53334
`ISBN 0-912734-04-3
`
`The use of structural formulas from USAN and the USP i")ic-tionary of Drug Names is by
`permission of The USP Convention. The Convention is not responsible for any inaccuracy
`contained herein.
`
`NOTICE-.‘—This text is not intended to represent, nor shah‘ it be interpreted to be, the equivalent
`of or a substitute for the officiai United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and/or the Nationai
`Farmuiary (NF).
`In the event of any difference or discrepancy between the current official
`USP or NF standards of strength, qaaiity, purity, pacizaging and labeling for drugs and
`representations of them herein. the context and effect of the official cornpendia shaii
`prevail.
`
`1.
`
`.
`
`Printed in the United States of America by the Mack Printing Company, Enston, Pennsyiuariia
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 4
`
`

`
`
`
`-
`
`PART 2
`
`Pharmaceutics
`
`Edward G Bippie PhD
`Professor of Phnrmacemlu
`University" of
`nesota
`Mlnneopolls
`55455
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 5
`
`

`
`no
`
`UHAPI l:H 9
`
`2. The product of the means divided by one extreme
`gives the other extreme.
`3. The product of the extremes divided by one mean
`gives the other mean. Therefore, if any three terms of a
`proportion are known, the fourth can be found by simple
`calculation.
`
`In solving problems involving proportions the following
`procedure may be used.
`
`First—-Let the unknown quantity be represented by X and let it be the
`fourth term.
`
`Second—-Let the third term he that number in the question which
`express the same kind of value (unit) as is expected in the answer.
`Third-—Arrange the remaining two quantities in the same ratio as the
`third term and X. Thus, the first and second terms will express the
`same kind of values (units) and the third and fourth terms will express
`the same kind of values.
`If the answer sought (X) is to be greater than
`the third term, the second term will be larger than the first, and vice
`verso.
`'
`
`Foo:-.rh—To solve for X, divide the product of the means by the known
`extreme. Cancel to simplify. Since the first and second terms form a
`ratio, common factors may be removed without altering the ratio; since
`the first and third terms are actually numerators of equal fractions, they
`can be divided by the same number without changing the proportion.
`
`Example
`
`100 g of a drug cost $1.80. How much will 25 g cost‘?
`
`If the three quantities in the problem, namely 100 g, $1.80 and 25 g are
`considered, it will be seen readily that 100 g bears the same relation to 25
`g as $1.80 does to the unlmown quantity to be calculated.
`In other
`words, the quantities and prices form equal ratios. The following pro-
`portion can be made
`
`100 g:25 g::$1.80:$X
`
`There are three known terms in the statement and X, the unknown term.
`Arithrnetically, the product of the means must equal the product of the
`extremes. Therefore, if one of the extremes is unknown, it may be
`calculated by dividing the product of the means by the known extreme.
`
`X =
`
`100 g
`
`= $945
`
`While the proportion is set down preferably as given above, it may be
`stated in several other ways. These are given below merely to show their
`relationship to the original form. It may be stated as two equal ratios in
`equation form
`
`100 E = $1.80
`25 g
`X
`
`Keeping in mind the basic three rules, it also is possible to place the
`unknown quantity, X, in either the first. second or third position as long
`as the relationship of the three known terms is not altered. Thus, the
`problem may be written as
`
`2. One pound of a chemical cost $7.65. What is the cost
`of sufficient chemical needed to make 10,000 capsules con-
`taining 0.2 g of the chemical?
`See also the preparation of isotonic solutions by propor-
`tion, Chapter 79.
`
`Percentage
`
`Percent, written as %, means per hundred. Fifteen per-
`cent is written 15% and means 15/399, 0.15, or 15 parts in a
`total of 100 parts. Percent is a type of ratio and has no units.
`Thus, 10% of 1500 tablets is “Fm X 1500 tablets = 150
`tablets.
`
`To change percent to a fraction the percent number he-
`comes the numerator and 100 is the denominator. To
`change a fraction to percent, put the fraction in a form
`having 100 as its denominator; multiply by 100 so that the
`numerator becomes the percent.
`
`_5o,
`50
`1i"g"‘fi, Td6X100=50%
`
`12.5
`, _ 12.5_
`fa Tm, T00 X 100
`
`=
`
`12.5%
`
`Calculations involving percentages are encountered contin-
`ually by pharmacists. They must be familiar, not only with
`the arithmetical principles, but also with certain compendial
`interpretations of the different type percentages involving
`solutions and mixtures.
`The USP states
`
`Percentage concentrations of solutions are expressed as follows:
`Percent weight in wer'gh.'.'—-(who) expresses the number of g of a
`constituent in 100 g of solution.
`Percent weight in uolume—-{w/u} expresses the number of g of a
`constituent in 100 1:11.. of solution. and is used regardless of whether
`water or another liquid is the solvent.
`Percent volume in uol'mne—(v/o) expresses the number of mL of a
`constituent in 100 ml. of solution.
`The term percent used without qualification means, formixtures of
`solids, percent weight in weight; for solutions or suspensions of solids in
`liquids, percent weight in volume; for solutions of liquids in liquids,
`percent volume in volume; and for solutions of gases in liquids, percent
`weight in volume. For example. a 1 percent solution is prepared by
`dissolving 1 g of a solid or 1 ml. of a liquid in sufficient of the solvent to
`make 100 mL of the solution.
`In the dispensing of prescription medications, slight changes in vol-
`ume owing to variations in room temperature may be disregarded.
`
`OI‘
`
`Ci!
`
`25 $100 g_::X:$1.80 (Rule 3)
`
`mm;-92 = $0.45
`100 g
`
`$1.80:X::100 g:25 g (Rule 3)
`
`$1.80 X 25 g = 0.45
`100g
`$
`
`X:$1.80::25 g:100 g (Rule 2)
`
`$1.80 x 25 =
`$0.45
`———Emg
`Obviously, the method of ratio and proportion can be used to solve more
`involved problems.
`
`Problems
`
`Ratio Strength
`
`This is another manner of expressing strength. Such
`phrases as “1 in 10” are understood to mean that 1 part by
`volume of a liquid is to be diluted with, or 1 part by weight of
`a solid dissolved in, sufficient of the solution to make the
`finished solution 10 parts by volume. For example, a 1:10
`solution means 1 mL of a liquid or 1 g of a solid ‘dissolved in
`sufficient solvent to make 10 mL of solution.
`It can be
`converted to percent by
`
`1 g:10 mL::X g:100 mL
`
`X = 10 g in 100 mL of solution which is 10%
`The expression “parts per thousand” leg, 1-5000) always
`means parts weight in volume when dealing with solutions of
`solids in liquids and is similar to the above expression. A
`1-5000 solution means 1 g of solute in sufficient solvent to
`make 5000 mL of solution. This can be converted to percent
`by
`
`If a drug costs $3.00/g, how.mudh would 65 mg cost?
`1.
`How much would 5 gr cost?
`
`1 g:5000 mL::X g:100 mL
`
`X = 0.02 g in 100 mL solution which is 0.02%
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 6
`
`

`
`SOLUTIONS AND PHASE EOUILIBRIA
`
`218
`
`Table IV-—SolubIlItlas of Potassium Iodide and Sodium
`Chloride In Several Alcohols and Acetone‘j.
`g KI!
`g Nacll
`
`100 9 SolventSolvent 100 g Solvent_j
`
`
`
`35.9
`8.3 I20“)
`7.1 I30")
`1.4
`
`.
`
`148
`
`. . .
`
`Water
`Glycerin
`50
`Propylene Glycol
`17
`Methanol
`. .
`2.9
`Acetone
`0.065
`1.38
`Ethanol
`0.0124
`0.44
`I-Propanol
`0.003
`0.18
`2-Propanol
`0.005
`0.20
`1-Butanol
`
`
`0.0891-Pantanol 0.0018.
`' All measurements are at 25°C unless otherwise indicated.
`
`water-structuring. Such an unfavorable entropy change is
`quite significant in the solution process. As an example of
`this effect, the aqueous solubility of a series of alkyl p-
`aminobenzoates shows a ten million-fold decrease in solubil-
`ity in going from the 1-carbon analog to the 12-carbon ana-
`log. These findings demonstrate clearly the considerable
`effect that hydrophobic associations can have.
`Alcohols—Ethonol, as a solvent, is next in importance to
`water. An advantage is that growth of microorganisms does
`not occur in solutions containing alcohol in a reasonable
`concentration.
`
`Resins, volatile oils, alkaloids, glycosides, etc are dissolved
`by alcohol, while many therapeutically inert principles, such
`as gums, albumin and starch, are insoluble, which makes it
`more useful as a “selective” solvent. Mixtures of water and
`alcohol, in proportions varying to suit specific cases, are used
`extensively. They are often referred to as hydroolcoholic
`solvents.
`
`Glycerin is an excellent solvent, although its range is not
`as extensive as that of water or alcohol. In higher concentra-
`tions it has preservative action.
`It dissolves the fixed alka-
`lies, a large number of salts, vegetable acids, pepsin, tannin,
`some active principles of plants, etc, but it also dissolves
`gums, soluble carbohydrates, starch, etc. It is also of special
`value as a simple solvent, as in phenol glycerite, or where the
`major portion of the glycerin simply is added as a preserva-
`tive and stabilizer of solutions that have been prepared with
`other solvents (see Glycerines, Chapter 34).
`Propylene glycol, which has been used widely as a substi-
`tute for glycerin, is miscible with water, acetone or chloro-
`form in all proportions.
`It is soluble in ether and will dis-
`solve many essential oils but is immiscible with fixed oils.
`It
`is claimed to be as effective as ethyl alcohol in its power of
`inhibiting mold growth and fermentation.
`Isopropyl alcohol possesses solvent properties similar to
`those of ethyl alcohol and is used instead of the latter in a
`number of pharmaceutical manufacturing operations.
`It
`has the advantage in that the commonly available product
`contains not over 1% of water, while ethyl alcohol contains
`about 5% water, often a disadvantage.
`lsopropyl alcohol is
`employed in some liniment and lotion formulations. It can-
`not be taken internally.
`General Properties—Low-molecular-weight and polyhy-
`droxy alcohols form associated structures through hydrogen
`bonds just as in water. When the carbon-atom content of an
`alcohol rises above five, generally only monomers then are
`present in the pure solvent. Although alcohols have high
`dielectric constants, compared to other types of solvents,
`they are small compared to water. As has been discussed,
`the solubility of salts in a solvent should be paralleled by its
`dielectric constant. That is, as the dielectric constant of a
`series of solvents increases, the probability of dissolving a
`salt in the solvent increases. This behavior is observed for
`the alcohols. Table IV, taken from I-Iiguchi,‘ shows how the
`solubility of salts follows the dielectric constant of the alco-
`hols.
`
`As mentioned earlier, absolute alcohol rarely is used phar-
`maceutically. However, hydroalcoholic mixtures such as
`elixirs and spirits frequently are encountered. A very useful
`Eeneralization is that the dielectric properties of a mixed
`solvent, such as water and alcohol, can be approximated as
`the weighted average of the properties of the pure compo-
`nents. Thus, a mixture of 60% alcohol (by weight) in water
`should have a dielectric constant approximated by
`
`‘(mama-:3 = 9-Mftaimhalil "' 0-4l‘twau-.nl
`
`r,,,,,,,,,,,, = o.e(2s} + o.4(so) = 47 .
`
`The dielectric constant of 60% alcohol in water is found
`
`experimentally to be 43, which is in close agreement with
`that just calculated. The dielectric constant of glycerin is
`46, close to the 60% alcohol mixture. One would, therefore,
`expect a salt like sodium chloride to have about the same
`solubility in glycerin as in 60% alcohol. The solubility of
`sodium chloride in glycerin is 8.3 g/100 g of solvent and in
`60% alcohol about 6.3 g/100 g of solvent. This agreement
`would be even closer if comparisons were made on a volume
`rather than weight basis. At least qualitatively it can be
`said that the solubility of a salt in a solvent or a mixed
`solvent very closely follows the dielectric constant of the
`medium or, conversely, that the polarity of mixed solvents is
`paralleled by their dielectric constant, based on salt solubili-
`ty.
`
`Although the dielectric constant is useful in interpreting
`the effect of mixed solvents on salt solubility, it cannot be
`applied properly to the effect of mixed solvents on the solu-
`bility of nonelectrolytes.
`It was seen earlier that unfavor-
`able entropic effects can occur upon dissolution of relatively
`nonpolar nonelectrolytes in water. Such an effect due to
`hydrophobic association considerably affects solubility.
`Yalkowskyil studied the ability of cosolvent systems to in-
`crease the solubility of nonelectrolytes in polar solvents
`where the cosolvent system essentially brings about a reduc-
`tion in structuring of solvent. Thus, by increasing, in a
`positive sense, the entropy of solution by using cosolvents, it
`was possible to increase the solubility of the nonpolar mole-
`cule. Using as an example the solubility of alkyl p-amino-
`benzoates in propylene glycol-water systems, Yalkowslry5
`reported that it is possible to increase the solubility of the
`nonelectrolyte by several orders of magnitude by increasing
`the fraction of propylene glycol
`in the aqueous system.
`Sometimes, it is found that, as a good first approximation,
`the logarithm of the solubility is related linearly to the frac-
`tion of propylene glycol added by
`
`log S, = log S,_o 4- cf
`
`where S; is the solubility in the mixed aqueous system con-
`taining the volume fraction f of nonaqueous cosolvent, S;..;
`is the solubility in water and e is a constant (not dielectric
`constant} characteristic of the system under study. Specif-
`cally, when a 50% solution of propylene glycol in water is
`used, there is a 1000-fold increase in solubility of dodecyl p-
`aminobcnzoate, in comparison to pure water.
`In a series of studies, Martin at at‘; have made attempts to
`predict solubility in mixed solvent systems through anes-
`tension of the “regular solution" theory. The equations are
`logarithmic in nature and can reduce in form to the equa-
`tions of Yalkowskyfi
`Acetone and Related Semipolar Mater-ials—Even
`though acetone has a very high dipole moment (2.8 X 10"“
`esu}, as a pure solvent it does not form associated structures.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 7
`
`

`
`must possess the ability to keep the solvated, charged ions
`apart with minimal energy. The role of the dielectric con-
`stant in keeping this energy to a minimum has been dis-
`cussed earlier.
`A polar liquid such as water may exhibit solvent action
`also by virtue of its ability to break a covalent bond in the
`solute and bring about ionization of the latter. For example,
`hydrogen chloride dissolves in water and functions as an acid
`as a result of
`
`+ H20 —’ H3O+ + C]-
`
`The ions formed by this preliminary reaction of breaking the
`covalent bond subsequently are maintained in solution by
`the same mechanism as ionic salts.
`Still another mechanism by which a polar liquid may act
`as a solvent is that involved when the solvent and solute are
`capable of being coupled through hydrogen-bond formation.
`The solubility of the low-molecular-weight alcohols in water,
`for example, is attributed to the ability of the alcohol mole-
`cules to become part of a water-alcohol association complex.
`H
`R
`H
`R
`I
`I
`I
`I
`H—o....--H—o-..---H——o».-..H—o
`
`As the molecular weight of the alcohol increases, it becomes
`progressively less polar and less able to compete with water
`molecules for a place in the lattice-like arrangement formed
`through hydrogen bonding; high-molecular-weight alcohols
`are, therefore, poorly soluble or insoluble in water. When
`the number of carbon atoms in a normal alcohol reaches five,
`its solubility in water is reduced materially.
`When the number of hydroxyl groups in the alcohol is
`increased, its solubility in water generally is increased great-
`ly; it is principally, if not entirely, for this reason that such
`high-molecular-weight compounds as sugars, gums, many
`glycosides and synthetic compounds, such as the polyethyl-
`ene glycols, are very soluble in water.
`The solubility of ethers, aldehydes, ketones, acids and
`anhydrides in water, and in other polar solvents, also is
`attributable largely to the formation of an association com-
`plex between solute and solvent by means of the hydrogen
`bond. The molecules of ethers, aldehydes and ketones. un-
`like those of alcohols, are not associated themselves. because
`of the absence of a hydrogen atom which is capable of form-
`ing the characteristic hydrogen bond. Notwithstanding,
`these substances are more or less polar because of the pres-
`ence of a strongly electronegative oxygen atom, which is
`capable of association with water through hydrogen-bond
`formation. Acetone, for example, dissolves in water, in all
`likelihood, principally because of the following type of asso-
`ciation:
`
`H I
`
`The maximum number of carbon atoms which may be
`present per molecule possessing a hydrogen-bondable
`group, while still retaining water solubility, is approximately
`the same as for the alcohols.
`Although nitrogen is less electronegative than oxygen and.
`thus, tends to form weaker hydrogen bonds, it is observed
`that amines are at least as soluble as alcohols containing an
`equivalent chain length. The reason for this is that alcohols
`form two hydrogen bonds with a net interaction of 12 kcal/
`mole. Primary amines can form three hydrogen bonds; two
`amine protons are shared with the oxygens of two water
`molecules, and the nitrogen accepts one water proton. The
`net interaction for the primary amine is between 12 and 13
`kcal/mole and, hence, it shows an equal or greater solubility
`compared with corresponding alcohols.
`'
`
`I‘)
`
`o E
`
`/..>
`CH,
`
`220
`
`CHAPTER 16
`
`H,c
`
`Fig 16-9. The charge separation In acetone.
`
`This is evidenced by its low boiling point (57°) in compari-
`son with the boiling point of the lower-molecular-weight
`water (100°) and ethanol (79°). The reason why it does not
`associate is because the positive charge in its dipole does not
`reside in a hydrogen atom (Fig 16-9), precluding the possi-
`bility of its forming a hydrogen bond. However, if some
`substance which is capable of forming hydrogen bonds, such
`as water or alcohol, is added to acetone, a very strong inter-
`action through hydrogen bonding will occur (see Mechanism
`of Solvent Action below). Some substances which are semi-
`polar and similar to acetone are aldehydes, low-molecular-
`weight esters, other ketones and nitro-containing com-
`pounds.
`Nonpolar Solvent:-3-This class of solvents includes fixed
`oils such as vegetable oil, petroleum ether (ligroin), carbon
`tetrachloride, benzene and chloroform. On a relative basis
`there is a wide range of polarity among these solvents; for
`example, benzene has no dipole moment while that of chlo-
`roform is 1.05 X 10'"3 esu. But even the polarity of these
`compounds normally classified as nonpolar is still in line
`with the dielectric constant of the solvent. The relation
`between these quantities is seen best through a quantity
`called molar refraction. The molar refraction (or refractivi-
`ty), R, of a compound is given by
`
`R =
`
`l'l2—l_M
`n2+2 D
`
`(19)
`
`where n is the refractive index of the liquid, M is its molecu-
`lar weight and D is its density. The similarity between Eq
`19 and Eq 16 is to be noted and, indeed, in refractive index
`measurements using very long wavelengths of light, n2 = 5.
`Thus, molar refraction under these conditions approximates
`total molar polarization. Since. in the more nonpolar sol-
`vents there is generally no dipole moment, u, total molar
`polarization reflects polarization due only to the induced
`dipoles possible. Thus
`
`P =—-.—=—.—=—«Na
`a
`n2 + 2 D
`
`(20)
`
`It is evident from this that the refractive index of a nonpolar
`compound reflects its relative polarity. For example, the
`more-polar benzene (e = 2.2) has a higher refractive index,
`1.501, than the less-polar hexane (e = 1.9), whose refractive
`index is 1.375.
`It should be emphasized again that when a solvent (such
`as chloroform) has highly electronegative halogen atoms at-
`tached to a carbon atom also containing at least one hydro-
`gen atom, such a solvent will be capable of forming strong
`hydrogen bonds with solutes which are polar in character.
`Thus, through the formation of hydrogen bonds such sol-
`vents will dissolve polar solutes. For example, it is possible
`to dissolve alkaloids in chloroform.
`
`Mechanism of Solvent Action
`
`A solvent may function in one, or more, of several ways.
`When an ionic salt is dissolved, eg, by water, the process of
`solution involves separation of the cations and anions of the
`salt with attendant orientation of molecules of the solvent
`about the ions. Such orientation of solvent molecules about
`the ions of the solute——a process called salvation (hydration,
`if the solvent is water)—is possible only when the solvent is
`highly polar, whereby, the dipoles of the solvent are attract-
`ed to and held by the ions of the solute. The solvent also
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 8
`
`

`
`SOLUTIONS AND PHASE EQUILIBRIA
`
`221
`
`The solvent action of nonpolar liquids involves a some-
`what different mechanism. Because they are unable to form
`dipoles with which to overcome the attractions between ions
`of an ionic salt, or to break a covalent bond to produce an
`ionic compound or form association complexes with a solute.
`nonpolar liquids are incapable of dissolving polar com-
`pounds. They only can dissolve, in general. other nonpolar
`substances in which the bonds between molecules are weak.
`The forces involved usually are of the induced di-
`pole—induced dipole type. Such is the case when one hydro-
`carbon is dissolved in another, or an oil or a fat is dissolved in
`petroleum ether. Sometimes it is observed that a polar
`substance. such as alcohol. will dissolve in a nonpolar liquid,
`such as benzene. This apparent exception to the preceding
`generalization may be explained by the assumption that the
`alcohol molecule induces a temporary dipole in the benzene
`molecule which forms an association complex with the sol-
`vent molecules. A binding force of this kind is referred to as
`a permanent dipole—inducea' dipole force.
`Some Useful Generalizations—The preceding discussion indicates
`that enough is known about the mechanism of solubility to be able to
`formulate some generalizations concerning this important physical
`property of substances. Because of the greater importance of organic
`substances in the field of medicinal chemistry, certain of the more useful
`generalizations with respect to organic chemicals are presented here in
`summary form. It should be remembered, however. that the phenome-
`non of solubility usually involves several variables. and there may be
`exceptions to general rules.
`the greater
`One general maxim which holds true in most instances is:
`the structural similarity between solute and solvent, the greater the
`solubility. As often stated to the student. “like dissolves like." Thus.
`phenol is almost insoluble in petroleum other but is very soluble in
`glycerin.
`Organic compounds containing polar groups capable of forming hy-
`drogen bouds with water are soluble in water, providing that the molecu-
`lar weight of the compound is not too great.
`It is demonstrated easily
`that the polar groups OI-I, CI-IO. COH, Cl-I01-I. CH10H. C001-l. Nflg,
`C0. NH: and S031! tend to increase the solubility of an organic com-
`pound in water. Do the other hand. nonpolar or very weal: polar groups.
`such as the various hydrocarbon radicals. reduce solubility: the greater
`the number of carbon atoms in the radical. the greater the decrease in
`solubility.
`Introduction of halogen atoms into a molecule in general
`
`Table V—DamonsIral|on of Solublllty Rules
`
`
` Chemical Compound Solubility‘
`
`28.6
`Aniline. C.;H.,Nl-lg
`1430
`Benzene. C.;Hg
`275
`Benzoic acid. Cal-l5C00H
`25
`Benzyl l1l(.‘0l'l0l. CsH5CHg0l'l
`12
`1-Butanol, C4Hg0H
`Miscible
`t-Butyl alcohol. {Cl-l3)3COI-I
`2000
`Carbon tetrachloride. CCI4
`200
`Chloroform. Cl-lCl3
`150
`Fumaric acid. trans-butenedioic acid
`14
`Hydroquinone, Cal-I.4(OH)2
`5
`Maleic acid. cis-butenedioic acid
`15
`Phenol. Cal-l5OH
`2.3
`Pyrocstechol. Cal-I4(Ol-l);
`1.7
`Pyrogallol. Cal-l;;(OH}3
`
`Resorcinol, C31-l.(OH)g 0.9
`
`“ The number of ml. of water required to dissolve 1 g of solute.
`
`tends to decrease solubility because of an increased molecular weight
`without a proportionate increase in polarity.
`The greater the number of polar groups contained per molecule. the
`greater the solubility of a compound. provided that the sire of the rest of
`the molecule is not altered; thus. pyrogallol is much more soluble in
`water than phenol. The relative positions of the groups in the molecule
`also influence solubility; thus, in water, resorcinol (tn-dihydroxyberv
`zone} is more soluble than catechol {o-dihydroxybenzene}. and the latter
`is more soluble than hydroquinone (p-dihydroxybenzene).
`Polymers and compounds of high molecular weight generally are insol-
`uble or only very slightly soluble.
`High melting points frequently are indicative of low solubility for
`organic compounds. One reason for high melting points is the associa-
`tion of molecules and this cohesive force tends to prevent dispersion of
`the solute in the solvent.
`The cis form of an isomer is more soluble than the trans form. See
`Table V.
`Salvation, which is evidence of the existence of a strong attractive
`force between solute and solvent, enhances the solubility of the solute.
`provided there is not a marked ordering of the solvent molecules in the
`solution phase.
`'
`Acids. especially strong acids, usually produce water-soluble salts
`when reacted with nitrogen-containing organic bases.
`
`Colligative Properties of Solutions
`Up to this point concern has been with dissolving a olute
`Osmotic-Pressure Elevation
`in a solvent. Having brought about the dissolution, the
`solution. quite naturally. has a number of properties which
`are different from that of the pure solvent. Of very great
`importance are the colligotive properties which a solution
`Possesses.
`
`The colligative properties of a solution are those that
`depend on the number of solute particles in solution. irre-
`spective of whether these are molecules or ions, large or
`Small. Ideally. the effect of a solute particle of one species is
`considered to be the same as that of an entirely different
`kind ofparticle, at least in dilute solution. Practically. there
`may be differences which may become substantial as the
`concentration of the solution is increased.
`The colligative properties which will be considered are:
`
`1- Osmotic pressure.
`2- V3???-liressure lowering.
`3- Bfllllug-point elevation.
`4‘ F“’331l1.E-point depression.
`
`Of these four. all of which are related. osmotic pressure
`hi!” the 8'1'eatest direct importance in the pharmaceutical
`sciences.
`It is the property that largely determines the
`phyamlflgical acceptability of a variety of solutions used for
`therapeutic Purposes.
`
`Diffusion in Liquids—-Although the property of diffu-
`sion is rapid in gaseous systems. it is not limited to such
`systems. That molecules or ions in liquid systems possess
`this same freedom of movement may be demonstrated by
`placing carefully a layer of water on a concentrated aqueous
`solution of any salt.
`In time it will be observed that the
`boundary between solvent and solution widens gradually
`since salt moves into the water layer and water migrates
`from its layer into the salt solution below. Eventually, the
`composition of the new solution will become uniform
`throughout. This experiment indicates that substances
`tend to move or diffuse from regions of higher concentration
`to regions of lower concentrations so that differences in
`concentration eventually disappear.
`0smosis—ln carrying out the experiment just described.
`it is impossible to distinguish between the diffusion of the
`solute and that of the solvent. However, by separating the
`solution and the solvent by means of a membrane that is
`permeable to the solvent. but not to the solute (such a mem-
`brane is referred to as a semipermeable membrane), it is
`possible to demonstrate visibly the diffusion of solvent into
`the concentrated solution, since volume changes will occur.
`In a similar manner. if two solutions of different concentra-
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1021 PAGE 9
`
`

`
`1314
`
`CHAPTER 66
`
`Uses-Contains ester and alcohol functions that impart both
`lyophilic and hydrophilic characteristics to make it useful as a sur-
`factant and emulsifier.
`It is an ingredient of some Waluehsoluble
`ointment and cream bases,
`
`Polysorbates
`
`d‘yl) derive. Monitans (Ives-
`.1_2. th
`(
`Sorbitan esters, pol
`Camerony>;‘§‘3z1ate§xA‘i,'L5.:});weens ucn
`*O(C,H.ol.,
`,..ioc,H.l. 0"
`H
`
`0
`
`¢::(oc,H.),ou
`u,c(oc,HJ.R
`[5“,,., 04 y'g_y. and 2 -I 20.
`R -1 lC.u"::lC°° l
`
`forming sorbitan (a cyclic sorbitol anhydride); (2) partial esterifica.
`tion of the sorbitan with a fatty acid such as oleic or stearic acid
`yielding a hexitan ester known commercially as a Span and (3)
`chemical addition of ethylene oxide yielding a Tween (the polyox.
`yethylene derivative).
`Description—Polysorbate 80: Lemon- to amber-colored, oily liquid-
`faint, characteristic odor; warm, somewhat bitter taste; specific gravity
`1.07 to 1.09; pH (1:20 aqueous solution) 6 to 8.
`Solubility—Polysorbate 80: Very soluble in water, producing an
`odorless and nearly colorless solution; soluble in alcohol, cottonseed oil
`corn oil, ethyl acetate, methanol or toluene; insoluble in mineral oil.
`
`’
`
`Uses——§ec_ause of their hydrophilic and lyophilic characteristics,
`these nomomc surfactants are very useful as emulsifying agents
`forming 0/W emulsions in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and other
`types of products. Polysorbate 80 is an ingredient in Coal Tar
`Ointment and Solution. See Glycol Ethers (page 1313).
`
`Sorbitan esters, polyoxyethylene derivatives; t'atty_acid esters of
`sorbitol and its anhydrides copolymenzed with a varying number of
`moles of ethylene oxide. The NF recognizes: Polysorbate 20
`(structure given above), a laurate ester; Polysorbate 40, a palmitate
`ester; Polysorbate 60, a mixture of stearate and palmitate esters;
`and Polysorbate so. an oleate ester-
`Prepa,rat,ion—The8e important nonionic surfactants (page 268)
`an mepared awning with sorbitol by (1) elimination of water-
`
`Other Water-Soluble Ointment Base Component
`Polyethylene Glycol 400 Monostearate USP XVI—An ether. alco-
`hol and ester. Semitransparent, whitish. odorless or nearly odorless
`mass; melts from 30 to 34°. Freely soluble in carbon tetrachloride.
`chloroform, ether or petroleum benzin; slightly soluble in alcohol; insolu-
`ble in water. Uses: A nonionic surface-active agent in the preparation
`of creams, lotions, ointments and similar pharmaceutical preparations,
`which are readily soluble in water.
`
`Pharmaceutical Solvents
`
`The remarkable growth of the solvent industry is attested
`by the more than 300 solvents now being produced on an
`industrial scale. Chemically, these include a great variety of
`organic compounds, ranging from hydrocarbons through al-
`cohols, esters, ethers and acids to nitroparaffins. Their
`main applications are in industry and the synthesis of organ-
`ic chemicals. Comparatively few, however, are used as sol-
`vents in pharmacy, because of their toxicity, volatility, insta-
`bility and/or flammability. Those commonly used as phar-
`maceutical solvents are described in this section.
`
`AC9lOfl9
`
`2-Propanone; Dimethyl Ketone
`
`CH3COCH3
`
`Acetone [67-64-1] c,H.,o (58.08).
`Caution—It is very flammable. Do not use where it may be
`ignited.
`Prepar-ation—Formerly obtained exclusively from the destruc-
`tive distillation of wood. The distillate. consisting principally of
`methanol, acetic acid and acetone was neutralized with lime and the
`acetone was separated from the methyl alcohol by fractional distilla-
`tion. Additional quantities were obtained by pyrolysis of the calci-
`um acetate formed in the neutralization of the distillate.
`It now is obtained largely as a by-product of the butyl alcohol
`industry. This alcohol is formed in the fe

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket