throbber
0013-'722'7/97/$03.00/0
`Endocrinology
`Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society
`
`Vol. 138, No. 4
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Characterization of the Ovariectomized Rat Model for
`
`the Evaluation of Estrogen Effects on Plasma Cholesterol
`Levels
`
`SCOTT G. LUNDEEN, JEFFREY M. CARVER, MAR-LEE MCKEAN, AND
`RICHARD C. WINNEKER
`
`Women’s Health Research Institute, Wyeth-Ayerst Research (S. G.L., J.M.C., R. C. W.), Radnor,
`Pennsylvania 19087; and Cardiovascular Research, Wyeth-Ayerst Research CM.-L.M.,), Princeton,
`New Jersey 08852
`
`ABSTRACT
`Estrogens protect against cardiovascular disease in women
`through effects on the vascular wall and liver. Here we further char-
`acterize the rat as a model for the evaluation of estrogenic effects on
`plasma lipid levels Us. uterine Wet weight. In adult ovariectomized
`female rats treated for 4 days sc, 17a-ethinyl estradiol (EE) was the
`most potent agent to lower plasma total and high density lipoprotein
`cholesterol levels, followed by 17B-estradiol and 17a-estradiol. How-
`ever, 17a-estradiol had the greatest separation of uterotropic vs. cho-
`lesterol-lowering effects. EE had the same lipid-lowering potency
`whether administered sc or orally to adult rats. It had no effect on
`cholesterol levels in immature rats, even though the uterotropic re-
`
`sponse was dramatic. Testosterone propionate, dexamethasone, and
`progesterone did not significantly lower cholesterol levels. The an-
`tiestrogens tamoxifen and raloxifene lowered cholesterol levels, but
`with less efficacy and potency than the estrogens. ICI 182780 had no
`effect on cholesterol levels. When coadministered with EE, ICI 182780
`inhibited the cholesterol-lowering and uterotropic activities of EE,
`suggesting that the estrogen receptor pathway is involved. In con-
`clusion, although the information from the rat is limited as a model
`of the low density lipoprotein-lowering effects of estrogens i.n humans,
`it can be used to study the effects and mechanism of action of estrogen
`and antiestrogens on plasma cholesterol levels. (Endocrinology 138:
`1552-1558, 1997)
`
`T HAS BEEN recognized for many years that estrogens
`have a profound beneficial effect on the cardiovascular
`system in women (1). Women receiving hormone replace-
`ment therapy have approximately a 50% reduction in car-
`diovascular disease (2). Most of this evidence has come from
`clinical trials and studies with nonhuman primates that have
`clearly demonstrated the beneficial effect of estrogens (2-5).
`Such studies, however, have provided limited insight into
`the molecular mechanisms by which estrogens exert their
`beneficial effects. Recent studies have provided evidence for
`some of the potential targets through which estrogen may be
`protecting the cardiovascular system. It is now clear that this
`protection by estrogen is due to both direct effects on the
`blood vessel wall (6),
`i.e. through the regulation of anti-
`atherogenic agents such as nitric oxide and indirect effects in
`the liver. The end result of estrogen action in the liver is
`altered plasma cholesterol levels. In humans, estrogens de-
`crease circulating low density lipoproteins (LDL) and in-
`creases high density lipoprotein (HDL) (7-9).
`Rats have been used as a model system to study estrogenic
`effects on plasma lipid levels (10-12). The predominant
`plasma cholesterol in rats is HDL, not LDL, as it is in humans.
`Estrogens dramatically decrease both LDL and HDL choles-
`terol plasma levels in rats. Therefore, one acknowledged
`weakness of the rat model is that it is only useful for eval-
`
`Received September 20, 1996.
`Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Scott G.
`Lundeen, Ph.D., Women’s Health Research Institute, I/\lyeth—Ayerst Lab-
`oratories, 145 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, Pennsylvania 19087. E—mail
`address: lundees@war.wyeth.com.
`
`uating the mechanisms involved in the LDL-lowering effects
`of estrogen and provides little, if any, relevant information
`on potential effects on I-IDL. As in humans, there is little
`information on the molecular mechanism bywhich estrogens
`lower cholesterol in the rat. Early studies provided mecha-
`nistic clues as to how the estrogens mediate their effects on
`plasma lipids. It was shown that pharmacological doses of
`estrogens up-regulate LDL receptors in rat livers (13, 14) and
`in human hepatoma cell lines (15). It has also been shown that
`LDL binding in human liver homogenates is correlated with
`serum estrogen concentrations (16). Regulation of the LDL
`receptors has been shown to involve both transcriptional (17)
`and posttranscriptional (13, 14) mechanisms.
`There also are few data to support the role of the classical
`estrogen receptor (ER) pathway in mediating the lipid-low-
`ering effect of estrogens. Clearly, transcriptional regulation
`of the LDL receptor provides suggestive evidence for clas-
`sical ER control. However, there are few data to support this
`wypothesis, and direct evidence for ER involvement is still
`acking. In fact, there is evidence suggesting that a novel
`nechanism is involved. Firstly, the antiestrogens tamoxifen
`and raloxifene act as estrogen agonists in the liver, causing
`a decrease in total plasma cholesterol in rats and LDL in
`iumans (11, 18-22). Secondly, the potencies of estrogens in
`he liver, as measured by changes in plasma cholesterol, do
`not correspond with their potencies in the uterus or their
`‘elative affinities for the ER (23).
`We initiated these studies to characterize the effects of
`
`estrogens on plasma lipid levels in rats as a model for the
`'ndirect cardioprotective effects of estrogen. In doing so, we
`lave examined several estrogenic and antiestrogenic com-
`
`1552
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2110 p. 1
`Mylan Pharrns. Inc. v. Astrazeneca AB IPR2016-01325
`
`

`
`ESTROGEN EFFECTS ON PLASMA CHOLESTEROL LEVELS
`
`1558
`
`pounds in this system and studied the role of the ER in
`mediating the response in the liver US. that in the uterus.
`Materials and Methods
`
`Reagents
`
`17a—Ethinyl estradiol (EE), 17B—estradiol (17B—EZ), 17a—estradiol (1711-
`E2), and dexamethasone were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St.
`Louis, MO); tamoxifen citrate was obtained from Stuart Pharmaceuticals
`(Wilmington, DE); progesterone and testosterone propionate were ob-
`tained from Steraloids (VVilton, NH). ICI 182,780 was generously sup-
`plied by Zeneca Pharmaceuticals (Wilmington, DE). Raloxifene was
`synthesized by the W yeth—Ayerst Medicinal Chemistry group. Stock
`solutions of the test compounds were prepared in either 100% ethanol
`or dimethylsulfoxide. The compounds were diluted into 10% ethanol in
`corn oil (Mazola, Best Food Division, CPC International Inc., Englewood
`Cliff, N]) vehicle before treatment of the animals.
`
`Animals and treatment protocols
`
`The research animals were housed in a facility accredited by the
`American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care in
`accordance with the Animal VVelfare Act and the Guide for the Care and
`Use of Laboratory Aniinals, and the study was approved by the insti-
`tutional animal care and use committee of VVyeth—Ayerst Research.
`Immature female (19 clays old) or ovariectomized female (60 day—old)
`Sprague—Dawley rats were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown,
`NY). The ovariectomies were performed by the supplier a minimum of
`8 days before the first treatment. The animals were housed under a 12-h
`light, 12-h dark cycle and given Purina 5001 rodent chow (North Penn
`Feeds, North INales, PA) and water rm’. l1Tb1Tt1.I.m. Upon arrival, the rats were
`randomized and placed in groups of four to eight, depending upon the
`experiment. The adult animals were given a minimum of 72 h to accli-
`mate to the surroundings. The treatment of the immature rats began 24 h
`after arrival to ensure that the rats did not reach sexual maturity before
`the completion of treatment. After the acclimation period, the animals
`were treated once a clay for 4 days with the compound(s) of interest.
`Doses were prepared based on milligrams per kg mean group BW.
`Administration of the compound was either by sc injection (sc) of 0.2 ml
`in the nape of the neck or intragastrically by gavage (orally) in a volume
`of 0.5 ml. A vehicle control group was included in all experiments.
`Approximately 24 h after the final treatment the animals were killed by
`C02 asphyxiation. After death, the uteri were removed from the animals,
`drained of fluid, stripped of remaining fat and mesentery, and weighed.
`Plasma cholesterol measurements
`
`Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture after death into
`vacuum tubes containing EDTA to prevent coagulation. The samples
`were centrifuged (1000 X g, 10 min), and the plasma was removed and
`placed in fresh tubes. Total cholesterol was determined in whole plasma
`using the Boehringer Mannheim Cholesterol/HP system pack (Boehr-
`inger Mannheim Diagnostic Laboratory Systems, Indianapolis, IN) and
`the Boehringer Mannheirn Hitachi 911 Analyzer (Boehringer Mannheim
`Diagnostic Laboratory Systems) by the Cardiovascular Division, Wyeth-
`Ayerst Research (Princeton, NI). HDL was determined in plasma from
`which the LDL and very low density lipoprotein were precipitated using
`the phosphotungstic acid/magnesium chloride precipitation method
`with the HDL—Cholesterol system pack as described by the manufacturer
`(Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostic Laboratory Systems). Briefly, 200 [Ll
`plasma were mixed with 500 pl precipitation reagent. The samples were
`incubated at room temperature for 10-30 min, then centrifuged at 2000 X
`g for 10 min. The supernatant solutions were removed and analyzed for
`cholesterol as described above for total cholesterol. The Boehringer
`Mannheim reagent composition for cholesterol measurement is identical
`in both kits. The kits were validated for cholesterol measurement using
`rat serum, with an intraassay coefficient of variation of l .l % and an
`interassay coefficient of variation of 1.8%. The reportable range for total
`cholesterol is 3- 800 mg/ cll, and that for HDL cholesterol is 3-150 mg/ dl.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`The data for uterine wet weights and plasma cholesterol levels were
`heterogeneous between the doses. Therefore, the uterine weights were
`
`transformed by logarithms, and cholesterol levels were transformed by
`square root to stabilize the variability. After transformation, the Huber
`M—estimation weighting was used to down—weight the outlying trans-
`formed observations (24). ]MP software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was
`used to analyze the transformed and weighted data for both the one—way
`ANOVA and the nonlinear dose—response curves. In all cases, the dose-
`response curves were nonlinear; that is, when the response was plotted
`against the log of the concentration, the curves were sigmoidal. Dose-
`response data are calculated and expressed as the ECSC, (mean : SE) for
`uterotropic effects and the IC50 (mean : SE) for lipid—lowering effects.
`The EC50 and IC50 values were calculated using the four—parameter
`logistic model that calculates the minimum, maximum, I-Iill’s coefficient,
`and ED50 (25). In cases where the dose—response curves did not plateau
`or the response was too shallow, the program was unable to calculate
`an EC50 or IC5,3 value. In these cases, the EC50 or IC50 values were
`estiinated graphically.
`
`Results
`
`Plasma lipid and uterotropic effects ofEE, 17a—E2, and
`1 75-E2
`
`The effect of EE, administered either orally or sc to adult
`ovariectomized rats, is shown in Fig. 1. When administered
`orally, uterine wet weight increased in a dose-dependent
`nanner (Fig. 1A), and both plasma total and HDL cholesterol
`evels decreased similarly (Fig. 1, B and C). The mean utero-
`ropic EC50 for four separate experiments was 100.8 pig/ kg
`3W, with IC50 values of 21.1 and 17.7 pig/kg Bl/V for total and
`-IDL cholesterol, respectively. When EE was administered
`via the sc route (five separate experiments), the mean EC50
`"or uterine wet weight increase over vehicle was 0.3 pg / kg
`3W, 300-fold lower than when SE was administered by ga-
`vage (Table 1). However, the IC50 values of E3 for plasma
`otal and -IDL cholesterol lowering were the about the same
`as when EE was administered orally (21.6 and 15.1 pg/kg
`3W, respectively). The data for HDL are shown were, but will
`not be shown for subsequent experiments because in all cases
`he effect of estrogens on plasma HDL was similar to that on
`plasma total cholesterol.
`To determine whether this was a unique property of EE,
`we evaluated 1701-E2 and 175-E2 in a similar study. The two
`compounds were administered at doses of 0.01, 0.5, and 5.0
`mg / kg BW, both orally and sc. As with EE, the effects of both
`compounds were more potent on the uterus when they were
`administered sc, yet their potencies for lipid lowering were
`the same regardless of the route of administration (Fig. 2).
`The estrogens 1701-E2 and 17B-E2 were also run in full
`dose—response curves using the sc route of administration.
`The EC50 values for uterine wet weight increase over vehicle
`were 207 and 0.67 pig/kg BW, respectively (Table 1). This
`difference in potencies of 17a-E2 and 17[5-E2 in the uterus
`correlates well with their relative affinities for the ER. How-
`
`ever, the potencies of the two compounds in the liver, as
`assessed by plasma total cholesterol levels, were only 2-fold
`different; IC50 values were 1414 and 665 pig / kg BW for 17a-E2
`and 17B—E2, respectively (Table 1).
`
`Regulation of lipid levels in immature rats
`
`To extend our studies to the immatt re rat model, we ran
`dose—response curves for 17oz—EE in 19—day—old rats. The com-
`pound was administered by gavage at doses ranging from
`1-5000 pLg/ kg BW. As expected, 1701-EE increased uterine
`wet weight with an EC50 of 8 ;ug/ kg BW (Fig. 3). However,
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2110 p. 2
`
`

`
`1554
`
`ESTROGEN EFFECTS ON PLASMA CHOLESTEROL LEVELS
`
`Endo 0 1997
`Vol 138 - No 4
`
`levels at the higher dose (Table 2). Dexamethasone signifi-
`cantly decreased body weight about 10% and 30% at 0.05 and
`5.0 mg/kg, respectively, but had no effect on uterine wet
`weight. Dexamethasone also significantly (P S 0.05)
`in-
`creased LDL cholesterol levels at 5.0 mg/ kg BW (Table 2).
`Progesterone had no effect on uterine wet weight or plasma
`cholesterol levels (Table 2).
`
`Plasma lipid and uterotropic effects of antiestrogens
`
`The estrogen antagonists tamoxifen, raloxifene, and lCl
`182,780 were also evaluated in this model. Tamoxifen was a
`partial agonist in the uterus when administered sc (Fig. 4A).
`However, its efficacy was only about 20% that of 17oz-EE. It
`had limited ability to lower plasma cholesterol levels; treated
`levels differed significantly from the control values only at
`1.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW. Although the decrease in plasma
`cholesterol was significant, it was small compared to the
`decrease evoked by the estrogens examined. Total choles-
`terol levels dropped from the control level of 82 mg/dl to 65
`and 52 mg/dl at 1.0 and 10.0 mg/kg BW, respectively (Fig.
`4B). Tamoxifen is metabolized in the liver to its active form,
`-1—hyd ‘oxytamoxifen (26). Therefore, we ran a dose—response
`curve with tamoxifen administered by gavage. Unlike
`17oz-E3 and the other compounds, the route of administra-
`tion d'd not affect the potency of the compound in either the
`uterus or liver (Fig. 4).
`Raloxifene, administered sc, also lowered plasma cholesterol
`at all doses tested (0.005, 0.05, 0.5, and 5.0 mg/ kg BVV). How-
`ever, the reduction was small (Fig. 5), lowering total cholesterol
`from the control level of 95 to 64 mg/dl at the 5.0 mg/ kg BW
`dose. Raloxifene also caused a small, but significant, increase in
`uterine wet weight at 0.5 and 5.0 mg/ kg BVV (Fig. 5).
`The pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780 was tested first for poten-
`ial estrogen agonist activity. Unlike the other antiestrogens
`ested, ICI 182,780 alone had no effect on either uterine wet
`weight or plasma cholesterol even at 5.0 mg/kg BW (Fig. 6, A
`and B). lCl 182,780 was also run as an antagonist against 1701-EE.
`n this experiment 17oz-EE was administered by gavage at 0.1
`ng/ kg BW. This dose, when administered orally, was about the
`ECSO dose for uterine wet weight increase and the ICBO dose for
`ipid lowering. ICI 182,780 was administered sc at doses rang-
`ng from 0.05—5.0 mg/kg BW. When the two compounds were
`coadministered, 10 182,780 blocked the uterine wet weight
`'ncrease induced by EE (Fig. 7A). It also blocked the lipid-
`owering effect of E3 (Fig. 7B), suggesting that E3 is acting
`hrough the ER to lower plasma cholesterol levels. The blockage
`of lipid lowering was maximal at about 1.0 mg/kg; however,
`‘t was not complete even at the 5.0 mg/ kg dose.
`
`Discussion
`
`Although the effects of estrogens in the liver and, in par-
`ticular, the involvement of estrogen in reducing plasma LDL
`cholesterol levels have been known for many years, the
`mechanism by which estrogens reduce LDL cholesterol is not
`well defined, especially at the molecular level. Studies using
`high doses of estrogens have indicated that the up—regulation
`of hepatic LDL receptors is the primary mechanism respon-
`sible for the lipid-lowering effect (13, 14). With the present
`studies we have attempted to better characterize the rat as a
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2110 p. 3
`
`400
`
`300
`
`200
`
`
`
`100
`
`o
`
`0
`
`10-4
`
`10-3
`
`10-2
`
`10-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`A
`
`E’
`2’
`
`E.
`
`g
`‘5
`
`3 E
`
`ED
`
`B
`
`E2U
`
`)2O
`
`_C
`
`0"
`
`<6
`*5I-
`
`0
`
`10-4
`
`10-3
`
`10-2
`
`1o-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`C
`
` 0
`
`10-4
`
`10-3
`
`10-2
`
`10-1
`
`10°
`
`101
`
`E2U
`
`19O
`
`.E
`
`O_
`
`lOI
`
`170c-Ethinyl estradiol (mg/kg BW}
`
`FIG. 1. Dose-response curves for EE on uterine Wet weight (A) and
`total (B) and HDL (C) cholesterol. EE was administered either in-
`tragastrically by gavage (
`) or sc injection ( O ) in 10% ethanol in corn
`oil vehicle once a day for 4 days.Points are the mean from four animals
`per group shown with the SE.
`
`unlike the adult rat, total and HDL cholesterol were un-
`changed, even at the 5.0 mg/kg dose (Fig. 3).
`
`Steroid specificity
`
`The steroid specificity of the lipid-lowering effect was also
`examined. The animals were treated with testosterone pro-
`pionate, dexamethasone, and progesterone by sc adminis-
`tration at doses of 0.05 and 5.0 mg/ kg BW. Testosterone
`propionate significantly increased uterine wet weight at 5.0
`mg/ kg BW and had a marginal effect on plasma cholesterol
`
`

`
`ESTROGEN EFFECTS ON PLASMA CHOLESTEROL LEVELS
`
`1555
`
`TABLE 1. Summary of EC50 and IC50 values for 17a-ethinyl estradiol, 173-estradiol, and 17a-estradiol
`
`Compound
`1701-Ethinyl estradiol
`
`173-Estradiol
`170:-Estradiol
`
`Route
`Oral“
`scb
`sc
`sc
`
`EC50 and IC50 values : SE are shown.
`‘I Mean and SE of four separate experiments.
`Z’ Mean and SE of five separate experiments.
`
`ECEO uterine Wt
`(Mg/kg BW)
`100.8 : 20.6
`0.30 i 0.15
`0.67 : 0.087
`207 i 37.2
`
`lC50 total cholesterol
`(Mg/kg BW)
`21.1 i 6.4
`21.6 i 7.8
`665 : 43.8
`1414 i 146
`
`n
`.
`Uterine Wet Weight
`
`Total Cholesterol
`
`100
`
`A
`
`400
`
`3
`E
`-- 300
`fi_§,
`‘1’
`E 200
`<0
`3
`Q)
`E 100
`<0
`
`D
`
`0
`
`B
`
`400
`
`3
`E
`H
`E) 300
`.5
`E 200
`
`100
`
`0
`
`aE
`
`cu
`5
`
`
`
`:-
`3
`U’ 75
`E,
`3
`.3 50
`9
`2
`C_> 25
`as
`
`I2
`
`0
`
`0
`
`10-2
`
`10-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`0
`
`10-2
`
`10-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`1713-estradiol (mg/kg BW)
`
`17B_eStradio| (mg/kg BW)
`
`Uterine Wet Weight
`
`
`
`0
`
`10-2
`
`1o-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`100
`
`9
`E
`C)
`g 75
`6
`.3 50
`
`O 25
`E
`*6
`" o
`
`Total Cholesterol
`
`
`
`170c—estradio| (mg/kg B\N)
`
`170:-estradiol (mg/kg BW)
`
`FIG. 2. The effect of the route of administration of 17B-E2 (A) and 1701-E2 (B) on uterine Wet Weight increase and plasma total cholesterol levels.
`The compounds were administered either intragastrically by gavage (Q) or by sc injection (
`) in 10% ethanol in corn oil vehicle once a day for
`4 days. Points are the mean from six animals per group for the 1'73-E2-treated animals and seven animals per group for the 17a-E2-treated
`animals, shown with the SE.
`
`model system for the lipid-lowering effects of estrogens, to
`further define the mechanism of action, and to address the
`role of the hepatic ER in this response.
`The rat has noted differences and shortcomings as a model
`for human cholesterol metabolism that must be considered
`
`when using the rodent model. Most notably, in the rat l-lDL
`is the predominant form of cholesterol in plasma, comprising
`about 60-70% of the total cholesterol pool. Moreover, both
`LDL and HDL cholesterol levels decrease after estrogen
`treatment; in humans, estrogens decrease plasma LDL, but
`increase plasma HDL (7-9). One mechanism that may ex-
`plain the difference in HDL metabolism is that rat HDL
`contains higher amounts of apoprotein E than does human
`
`-IDL (10). The rat LDL receptor has high affinity for apo-
`protein E. Therefore, HDL particles containing apoprotein E
`are cleared from the blood at a higher rate in rats than in
`iumans after estrogen treatment (10). A second mechanism
`hat may contribute to the decrease in plasma HDL in rats is
`he effect of estrogen on the enzymes involved in l-lDL me-
`abolism. It has been reported that estrogens decrease li-
`poprotein lipase (LPL) activity in rats (27, 28). Decreasing
`LPL activity lowers plasma HDL levels. Moreover, hepatic
`ipase, which is down—regulated after estrogen treatment in
`iumans (29), is not regulated by estrogen in rats (30). There-
`fore, clearly, the effects of estrogen on HDL metabolism
`cannot be addressed in this model. Even with the differences
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2110 p. 4
`
`

`
`1556
`
`ESTROGEN EFFECTS ON PLASMA CHOLESTEROL LEVELS
`
`Endo 0 1997
`Vol 138 - No 4
`
`150
`
`_n_ OC
`
`
`
`UterineWetWeight(mg)<—-—)
`
`80
`
`60
`
`(mg/cll)
`PlasmaCholesterol
`
`
`40
`
`20
`
`(-1:-—)
`
`0
`
`10-3
`
`10-2
`
`10-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`170a-EE (mg/kg BW)
`FIG. 3. The effect of EE on uterine wet weight (I) and plasma total
`cholesterol levels (
`) in immature Sprague-Dawley rats. Nineteen-
`day-old Sprague-Dawley rats were treated for 4 days with EE in 10%
`ethanol in corn oil intragastrically by gavage. Points are the mean
`from eight animals per group, shown with the SE. Only the uterine
`weights are significantly different fro111 the vehicle control value (*,
`P < 0.05).
`
`TABLE 2. Steroid speci"icity of lipid lowering in adult
`ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats
`
`Com Ound
`p
`
`Vehicle
`Testosterone
`
`Dose
`(mg/kg BVV)
`0.0
`0.05
`
`propionate
`Dexamethasone
`
`Progesterone
`
`.
`.
`5 O
`0.05
`5.0
`
`0.05
`5.0
`
`Uterine wet wt
`(mg)
`85.9 i 7.2“
`86.3 : 4.4
`
`. G
`. i
`16 3
`246 3
`90.5 i 2.1
`78.9 i 1.7
`
`95.3 : 5.2
`100.9 : 4.1
`
`Plasma total
`cholesterol (mg/dl)
`80.3 : 3.2
`77.6 : 8.5
`
`. i . G
`68 1
`2 4
`86.6 : 5.0
`117.8 : 6.2“
`
`85.3 : 3.2
`82.3 i 3.8
`
`Compounds were administered sc. Shown are the mean i SE for
`groups of eight animals.
`" Significantly different from vehicle control (P < 0.05).
`
`in HDL metabolism, the rat system provides a good model
`to study the mechanism of LDL lowering. There is evidence
`that at least some aspects of the mechanism of LDL lowering
`are similar in rats and humans. The LDL receptor is up-
`regulated in rats; there is evidence for similar regulation in
`the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 and in human liver
`homogenates (13—16). The validity of the model is further
`supported by the fact that compounds that reduce plasma
`total cholesterol in the rat model, such as EE, 1713-E2, tamox-
`ifen, and raloxifene, have beneficial effects on plasma cho-
`lesterol profiles when administered to humans (2, 22, 31).
`There are conflicting reports as to whether, in humans, the
`beneficial effects of estrogen on plasma cholesterol requires
`the ”first pass” through the liver. There are reports demon-
`strating that when estrogens are administered through trans-
`dermal patches, the compounds have little effect on plasma
`cholesterol levels (32). Other reports demonstrate significant
`effects of estrogens on plasma cholesterol when adminis-
`tered by either an oral or a transdermal route (33, 34). In the
`rat, our studies demonstrate that the potencies of five dif-
`ferent estrogens on cholesterol lowering are unaffected by
`the route of administration. 1f the first pass through the liver
`
`A
`
`200
`
`150
`
`100
`
`(mg)
`UterineWetWeight
`
`50
`
`0
`
`10-4
`
`10-3
`
`10-9
`
`10-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`100
`
`\I01
`
`l\)0101o
`
`0
`
`10-4
`
`10-3
`
`10-2
`
`10-1
`
`100
`
`101
`
`Tamoxifen citrate (mg/kg BW)
`
`
`
`
`
`TotalCholesterol(mg/dl)
`
`FIG. 4. The effect ofthe antiestrogen tamoxifen citrate on uterine wet
`weight (A) and plasma total cholesterol (B). Tamoxifen citrate was
`administered either sc (
`) or intragastrically by gavage (9) in 10%
`ethanol in corn oil for 4 days. Points represent the mean from eight
`animals per group, shown with the SE. *, Significantly different from
`vehicle control (P < 0.05 with oral administration. T, Significantly
`different from vehicle control (P < 0.05) with sc administration.
`
`was required for the effects of the estrogens, the potencies
`would differ when the compounds were administered orally
`or sc. Therefore, in the rat, the cholesterol-lowering effect of
`estrogen does not require the first pass through the liver.
`Our studies demonstrate that estrogens have no effect on
`plasma cholesterol levels in the immature rat. To our knowl-
`edge, this is the first report of this finding. It has previously
`been shown that there is developmental regulation of com-
`ponents of the plasma lipoprotein particles in rats. The mes-
`senger RNA levels for both apoprotein AI and AH rapidly
`change between days 20 and 40, the period when the animals
`go through sexual maturation (35). Also, platelet-activating
`factor-acetylhydrolase, an enzyme that is associated with
`LDL and HDL particles, is estrogen regulated in adult rats,
`but not in immature rats (36). 1t has been reported that ER
`levels in the liver are developmentally regulated (37), low in
`immature animals and higher in adult animals, and may
`account for the developmental regulation. We are interested
`in this developmental regulation and are continuing to pur-
`sue its mechanism.
`
`The effects of both tamoxifen and raloxifene on plasma lipid
`levels were less than reported previously (11, 18-20). This is
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2110 p. 5
`
`

`
`ESTROGEN EFFECTS ON PLASMA CHOLESTEROL LEVELS
`
`1557
`
`100
`
`E E
`
`,
`G)
`
`E3
`
`E(D
`-E
`2Z)
`
`B A
`
`ED)
`
`EO
`"
`
`A100
`
`
`
`
`
`.—-2 PlasmaCholesterol(mg/dl)
`
`
`
`UterineWetWeight(mg)
`
`(—I=——)
`
`o1o3
`
`102
`
`104
`
`100
`
`1M
`
`Raloxifene (mg/kg BW)
`FIG. 5. The effect of raloxifene on uterine wet weight (I) and plasma
`total cholesterol levels (
`). Raloxifene was administered by sc injec-
`tion in 10% ethanol in corn oil for 4 days. Points represent the mean
`from eight animals per group, shown with the SE. *, Uterine wet
`weight significantly different fro111 that in the vehicle control (P <
`0.05). +, Total cholesterol significantly different from the Vehicle con-
`trol value (P < 0.05).
`
`probably due to the fact that the duration of our treatment was
`only 4 days, much shorter than in previous studies. cis-tamox-
`ifen, when administered at 0.5 mg/ kg BW for 12 days, de-
`creased total plasma cholesterol 65% (19). Similarly, when ta-
`moxifen citrate was administered weekly at 20.0 mg/ kg BW for
`4 weeks, both total and HDL cholesterol levels decreased about
`50% from control levels (18). Raloxifene has also been reported
`to lower total cholesterol in rats when administered daily for 5
`weeks (11, 20). Clearly, the shorter treatment time produced a
`much smaller response than the long term treatment. However,
`the 4-day period is long enough to see significant lowering of
`plasma lipids.
`lnterestingly, the potencies of 17a-E2 and 173-E2 in the
`liver and uterus are very different. The potencies we have
`seen in the uterus correspond well with the affinities of these
`two ligands for the ER (23). However, the difference in lC50
`values for these compounds for lipid lowering is only 2-fold.
`It is not believed that the liver has the enzymatic capacity to
`isomerize the 17oz-isomer to the 17B-isomer. Therefore, the
`mechanism for estrogenic effects on lipid lowering may be
`different from the mechanisms involved in the uterus.
`To address the issue of whether the classical ER is medi-
`
`ating the lipid-lowering effect of estrogens, we used the pure
`antiestrogen ICI 182,780. This compound is a potent anties-
`trogen with little known agonistic activity and is believed to
`act specifically through the ER (38). ICI 182,780 administered
`alone had no effect on either uterine wet weight or plasma
`cholesterol levels, supporting its profile as a pure antiestro-
`gen. However, when administered along with EE, it was able
`to block the effect of EE on both uterine wet weight and
`plasma cholesterol. However, the lipid levels never return to
`the vehicle-treated control levels when lCl 182,780 is used as
`an antagonist. lt is not clear whether this residual response
`represents an effect that is mediated by a nonreceptor mech-
`anism or the biological variability of the system. This is the
`first report of the effect of ICI 182,780 on rat liver and, in
`particular, plasma cholesterol levels. More importantly, it
`provides evidence for the involvement of the ER in control-
`ling plasma lipid levels.
`
`Veh
`
`EE
`0.1
`
`0.05
`
`0.5
`
`1.0
`
`5.0
`
`ICI 182,780
`
`FIG. 6. The effect of ICI 182,780 on uterine wet weight (A) and
`plasma total cholesterol levels (B). ICI was administered sc at doses
`of 0.05—5.0 mg/kg BVV in 10% ethanol in corn oil vehicle once a day for
`4 days (11 = 6 animals/group). Bars represent the SE. *, Significantly
`different from vehicle control (P S 0.05).
`
`ln summary, we have further characterized the rat as a
`nodel for estrogen-mediated plasma cholesterol lowering. It
`now seems likely that estrogens are functioning through the
`ER, but there are still many questions that need to be ad-
`dressed. Primarily, what are the molecular targets through
`which estrogens regulate plasma cholesterol levels? The LDL
`‘eceptor is one target already identified, but are there others?
`What relevance do the targets in rats have in regulating
`cholesterol levels in humans‘? Is there a non—ER—mediated
`
`component involved in the regulation, and wha is the mech-
`anism of the developmental regulation of the estrogen-in-
`duced lipid lowering? Studies are in progress to address
`some of these important questions.
`
`Acknowledglnents
`
`l/Ve gratefully acknowledge the scientific input and technical exper-
`tise of Dr. Steven Adelman and the Cardiovascular Group of Wyeth-
`Ayerst Research. We also acknowledge the expertise of the Wyeth-
`Ayerst Research Bioresources Department for its excellent animal care
`and technical assistance, and the Wyeth—Ayerst Research Biometrics
`Department for its assistance with statistical analysis.
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2110 p. 6
`
`A
`
`3 200
`
`
`
`150
`
`100
`
`50
`
`0
`
`Veh
`
`5.0
`1.0
`0.5
`0.05
`EE
`0.1 ————:.j
`lC|182,780
`
`100
`
`75
`
`g;
`E(I)
`1;
`2O
`_C
`0 25
`
`so
`
`0
`
`

`
`1558
`
`ESTROGEN EFFECTS ON PLASMA CHOLESTEROL LEVELS
`
`Endo 0 1997
`Vol 138 - No 4
`
`m
`
`(H
`
`\1
`
`lipoproteins: unresolved issues in biology and clinical practice. Ann NY Acad
`Sci 592:272—285
`. Windler EET, Kovanen PT, Chao Y-S, Brown MS, Havel RI, Goldstein IL
`1980 The estradiol—stimulated lipoprotein receptor of rat liver. I Biol Chem
`255:10464—10471
`. Black LI, Sato M, Rowley ER, Magee DE, Bekele A, Williams DC, Cullinan
`GI, Bendele R, Kauffman RF, Bensch WR, Frolik CA, Termine ID, Bryant HU
`1994 Raloxifene (LY139481 HCI) prevents bone loss and reduced serum cho—
`lesterol without causing uterine hypertrophy. I Clin Invest 93:63—69
`. Washburn SA, Adams MR, Clarkson TB, Adelman SJ I993 A conjugated
`equine estrogen with differential effects on uterine weight and plasma cho—
`lesterol in the rat. Am I Obstet Gynecol 169:251—256
`. Kovanen PT, Brown MS, Goldstein IL 1979 Increased binding of low density
`lipoprotein to liver membranes from rats treated with 17a—ethinyl estradiol.
`I Biol Chem 254:11367—1l373
`. Chao Y-S, Windler EE, Hen GC, Havel RI 1979 Hepatic catabolism of rat and
`human lipoproteins in rats treated with 17cv—ethinyl estradiol. I Biol Chem
`254:1l360—1l366
`. Semenkovich CF, Ostlund RE 1987 Estrogens induce low—density lipoprotein
`receptor activity and decrease intracellular cholesterol in human hepatoma cell
`line HepG2. Biochemistry 26:4987—4992
`. Nanjee MN, Koritnik DR, Thomas I, Miller ME 1990 Hormonal determinants
`of apolipoprotein B, E receptor expression in human liver. Positive association
`of receptor expression with plasma estrone concentration in middle—aged/
`elderly women. Biochim Biophys Acta 1046:151—158
`. Ma PTS, Yamamoto T, Goldstein IL, Brown MS I986 Increased mRNA for
`low density lipoprotein receptor in livers of rabbits treated with 17a—ethinyl
`estradiol. Proc ,\Iatl Acad Sci LISA 83:792—796
`. Gold E, Stapley S, Goulding A 1994 Tamoxifen and norethisterone: effects on
`plasma cholesterol and total body calcium content in the estrogen deficient rat.
`Horm Metab Res 26:100 —103
`. Donati RI, Harper PV, Hughes A, Hay RV 1990 Serum Lholesterol— and
`apolipoprotein B—lowering effects on cis—tamoxifen. Arteriosclerosis 10:822A
`(Abstract)
`Evans G, Bryant HU, Magee D, Sato M, Turner RT 1994 The effects of
`raloxifene on tibia histomorphometry in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology
`134:2283—2288
`McDonald CC, Stewart HI 1991 Fatal myocardial infarction in the Scotfish
`adjuvant tamoxifen tr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket