throbber
ICI 182,780 antagonizes the effects of estradisl on
`estrous behavior and energy balance in Syrian hamsters
`
`GEORGE N. WADE, J. BRADLEY POWERS.
`JEFFREY D. BLAUSTEIN, AND DEBORAH E. GREEN
`Department of Psychology and Neurossience and Behavior Program,
`University of Massachusetts, Amherst, llrfassachusstts 01003
`
`Wade, George N., J. Bradley Powers, Jeffrey D.
`Blaustein, and Deborah E. Green. ICI 182,780 antagonizes
`the effects of estradinl an estrous behavior and energy balance
`in Syrian han1z:bers.Am. J. Physiol. 265 (flegulamry Integrative
`Comp. Physicll. 34): R1399—R1-403, 1993.~—Tl;u-ee experiments
`examined the effects of H31 182,780, a steroidal “pure” aI1ties-
`tmgen that is thought to be active peripherally but mm. in the
`brain when given systemically, on energy balance, eslmus be-
`havior, and in viva cell nuclear binding of Pfllestrsdiol in Syr-
`ian hamsters. Pretreatment with lICl 182,780 reduced in Viva
`uptake sf [slilestradiol in uterus but not in pooled hypothala-
`mus-preoptic area. Qvariectomised Syrian hamsters were
`treated with estradiol benzoate {E33, 5 pzgjday}, ICI 182.780 (250
`pg/daylp or both EB and ICI 182380 for 4 wk. Estradicll treat-
`ment. caused significant decreases in feed intake, body weight
`and fat content, and linear gmwth. Given altme, ICI 182.’:'é:‘~0
`had no effect on these measures. When they were given concur-
`rently, ICI 182,780 attenuated the effects of estradiol an bad};
`weight, growth, and fat cnntent but not on food intake. ‘Treat-
`ment. with ICI 182,780 significantly diminished estrous behav-
`ior induced with either EB plus progesterone or with EB alcme.
`These findings support the hypothesis that. in addition to its
`actions in the brain, esnradlul acts peripherally tn modulate
`estmua luehaviur and energy balance.
`body weight; body cempositiuu; uterus; food intake; estrogen
`receptors
`
`affect other social behaviors (21), but the possibility of
`peripheral sites of action has not been tested. Second, it
`has been suggested that estradiol can act peripherally to
`alter lipid metabolism and energy balance in hamsters
`(3), but the evidence for this nutiun is rather indirect.
`Third, hamsters and rats differ in some of their re-
`sponses to antiestmgens. The older nonsteroidal amiss-
`trogens such as MER-25. (31-6223. and tamoxifen inhibit
`steroi<l—inducecl estrous behavior in both species (13, 14,
`17, 25). However, for regulation of energy balance these
`compounds are full estmgen agonists in rats, whereas
`they act as antagenists in hamsters (24.-, 25}. Thus the
`newer, steroidal antiestrogens such as 1131 182380 may
`have different effects in rats and hamsters.
`
`METHODS
`
`Animals and Housing
`
`Adult, female Syrian hamsters (Mes0crz?cetus auratus; initial
`body wt 90-110 g) of the Lak:LVG strain were obtained from
`Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Ham-
`sters were housed in wire-bottom stainless steel cages (17.5 X
`17.5 X 25 cm) and given tap water and Purina Laboratory
`Rodent Chow (no. 5001} ad lihitum. Faod pellets were placed on
`the cage floor. A 14:10-h lightwdark cycle was maintained (lights
`an at W00 11}, and room temperature was kept at 22 i 2° C. After
`1 W35 of a-Eclimafiem to the laboratary. animals were ::wariez:£o—
`mixed via bilateral flank incisions under pezlwbarbital sudium
`anesthesia {S0 mgfkg; Sigma Chemical, St. Lcmis. MO}.
`
`Prncsdures
`
`IT IS CLEAR ‘PHAT omnlm steroids can act directly in
`the brain to affect a wide variety of behaviors and physi-
`cslogicsl functions, including social behaviors, regulatory
`behaviars, and energy balance (2, 4, 21, 23, 26}. For
`example, appropriately placed inttacerebral implants of
`estrsdicl facilitate estrous hehavicr, decrease focad in-
`In also binding of Pfljestradial. Three weeks after mariac-
`take, or stimulate valuntary exercise in ovariectomized
`tomy, hamsters were given three daily injections of sesame oil
`in = 6) or 250 ,ug ICI 182,780 in = 6). One hour after the third
`rats (6, 18, 27}; lesions of these neural lflci prevent; the
`injection, animals were injected intraperimneally with 60 ,uCi
`respective behavioral changes in response to systemic
`[“H]sstradi::nl (sp act 103 Ci/mmnl, New England Nuclear, Bos-
`estradiol treatment (7. 9, 12).
`mn, MA). One hour after injection of [3H}estradiol, hamsters
`In addition to these central actions, several lines of
`were anesthetized with penmbarbital sodium (50 mg); a blood
`evidence support the hypothesis that estradiul can act
`sample was taken via cardiac puncture with a heparinized sy-
`on nsnneursl peripheral tissues to affect. behaviors and
`ringe and then centrifuged. Hamsters were then perfused with
`energy balance in rats (22, 23, 26}. The fact that the
`cvsld saline (0.15 M). The hypothalamus-preoptic area and
`antiastrngen ICI 182,780 attenuates the effects of estra~
`uterus were rapidly disseated. Tissues were hamageniwsd, and a
`dial on energy balance and estrous behavior in ovarian-
`cell nuclear fraction was purified by a modification (8) of the
`tumized rats is consistent with the existence of periph-
`method of Zigmond and Mc:Ewen €30}. Radioactivity was ex—
`tracted from the purified cell nuclei with 3 :4 fl ml toluenehased
`eral sites of action (22). ICI182,?80 differs from other
`scintillation fluid. A. 100—;ll aliquot of plasma was transferred to
`antiestmgens in that it is highly potent peripherally but
`a scintillatisn vial containing 12 ml of scimillatimz fluid and
`it does not appear ts be active in the brain when it is
`shalien xrigcrausly. Radioactivity was cuuntsd at an efficiency of
`administered systemically (22, 28, 29).
`~45%, and counts were corrected for quenching by autnmatic
`The idea that astradiol acts hath centrally and periph-s
`external standardization. Protein in cell nuclear samples was
`erally to affect behaviors and energy balance has not
`precipitated with ethanol. dissolved in 0.3 N KOH, and esti-
`been explored in species other than rats. The present
`mated by the method cf Bradford (5). Tissue cell lmclear con-
`experiments use ICI 182,780 to investigate this possibib
`centrations of radioactivity are expressed as tissue to plasma
`ity in Syrian hamsters. Hamsters are of interest for
`Ifltlflfi (i.e., disintegrations per minutes past milligram tissue pro-
`several reasons. First, it is known that estradiol can act
`tein divided by disintegrations per minute per micraliter blood
`directly in the brain to facilitate sexual receptivity and
`plasma).
`0363-6119,f93 $2.00 Copyright '33 L998 the American Physiological Snclety
`
`R1399
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 1
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. V. Astrazeneca AB IPR2016-01325
`
`

`

`R1400
`
`ANTIESTRDGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`Uterus
`
`Brain
`
`A OG
`
`03 OO
`
`NOC)
`
`E2’:2
`
`UEt
`
`o
`.9CL\~.
`in
`1
`.9I-
`
`3V
`
`
`
`Energy balance. Three weeks after ovariectomy, baseline food
`intake [pouching and spillage accounted for) and body Weight
`were measured to the nearest 0.1 g. After 1 wk of data collection,
`animals were divided into four groups matched for baseline food
`intake and body weight. The groups were given daily subcuta-
`neous injections of 0.1 ml sesame oil vehicle containing 2.5%
`ethanol (n = 11), 5 pg estradiol benzoate (EB, n = 10), 250 pg
`ICI182,780 (n. = 11), or 5 pg EB plus 250 fig’ ICI 182,780 in =
`10) for 4 wk. Body weight and food intake were measured twice
`a week. On the first and last. days of injections, hamsters were
`anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (80 mgfkg body wt),
`and naso-anal length was measured to the nearest millimeter
`with calipers while the animals were stretched with a constant
`100—g weight (24). The difference between the two lengths is an
`index of linear growth during hormone treatment.
`At the end of the experiment all animals were killed with an
`overdose of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg). Parametrial and ret-
`roperitoneal fat pads and uteri were removed and weighed. Evia-
`cerated carcasses were dried to a constant weight at 70° C, and
`carcass lipid was estimated from carcass water content. in ham-
`sters, percent carcass water and percent carcass lipid are highly
`correlated (r = 0.98; ‘Pblipid = -1.32 X %Water + 96.54; n = 289;
`Wade, unpublished data). Fat—free dry weight was calculated as
`the total eviscerated carcass weight less water and estimated
`lipid content.
`Estrous behavior. The animals that were treated with EB,
`ICI182,780, or EB plus ICI 182,780 (above) were tested for
`estrous behavior twice, once with and once without progeste-
`rone treatment. On the 3rd day of estrogen and/or antiestrogen
`treatment, all animals were given a subcutaneous injection of
`200 pg progesterone in 0.1 ml sesame oil at 0900 h and tested for
`estrous behavior 5 to 6 h later. The second test, without. pro-
`gesterone, took place on the 23rd day of estrogen and/or anti-
`estrogen treatment. For both tests, females were adapted to a
`small Plexiglas arena (30 X 36 X 30 cm) for 5 min. Sexual
`receptivity tests were begun by introducing a sexually active
`male to the arena. In addition, the females flanks and perigeni—
`tal region were continuously stimulated using an eyelid brush.
`Tests lasted for 180 s; the latency to display lordosis and the
`total time that the lordosis posture was maintained were re-
`corded. Tests were conducted 6-8 h after ligl1ts—on.
`
`Data A nalyses
`
`ICI
`Oil
`ICI
`Oil
`Fig. 1. Effects of ICI 182,780 (ICI) on in vivo uptake of [3H]estradi0l by
`cell nuclei in uterus and hypothalamus-preoptic area in ovariectomized
`hamsters. Animals were treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml) or ICI
`(250 pg) 48, 24, and 1 h before injection of [3H]estradiol. Data are
`expressed as tissue to plasma ratios, that is, disintegrations per minute
`per milligram cell nuclear protein divided by disintegrations per minute
`per microliter plasma. * P <: 0.05 vs oil—treated group.
`
`Food intake (g/day)
`
`n‘
`l4 ‘
`
`_,
`x
`'
`\_\_"'*l’)—
`on
`‘l9:'9*‘—
`..—;§<1Ci
`‘'\‘\E‘‘‘'’‘‘“.8:3(‘‘''‘‘‘~T%:~.
`‘\\-~~../.::..*2~B
`EB-a-lCl
`‘’
`
`41
`
`I
`
`l
`
`|
`
`Body weight change lg)
`
`20
`
`
`
`Data were analyzed by t tests and by one- or two -way analyses
`of variance followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc tests where
`appropriate. Differences were considered statistically signifi
`cant when P < 0.05 for two tails. Data are expressed as means
`i SE.
`
`Days oftreoimeni
`Fig. 2. Body weight gain and food intake of ovariectornized hamsters
`treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml), estradiol benzoate (EB, 5 _ug{
`clay), ICI (250 pg/day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. (Initial mean group body
`weights 13-4.2—135.9 g.)
`
`RESULTS
`
`In Vivo Binding of [3H]Estradiol
`Pretreatment with ICI 182,780 significantly reduced in
`vivo cell nuclear binding of [3H]estradio1 in uterus but
`not in pooled hypothalamus-preoptic area (Fig. 1), simi-
`lar to findings with rats (22). However, uterine [3H]-
`estradiol binding was reduced by only ~50% in hamsters
`compared with ~90% in rats (22).
`
`Energy Balance
`EB treatment significantly reduced food intake and
`body weight gain (Fig. 2). ICI 182,780, given alone, had
`no effect on body weight, but it significantly attenuated
`the weight—reducing actions of EB. Given alone or in
`combination with EB, ICI 182,780 had no effect on food
`intake (Fig. 2).
`
`Treatment with EB caused significant reductions in
`carcass water and lipid but not in fat—free dry weight (Fig.
`3). Once again, ICI 182,780 alone had no effect, but it
`antagonized the effects of EB on carcass lipid content.
`The changes in body fat content were reflected in the
`weights of individual fat pads (Fig. 4). EB also caused a
`significant decrease in linear growth (change in nasoanal
`length) that was prevented by concurrent treatment with
`ICI 182,780 (Fig. 4). Administration of ICI 182,780 alone
`did not affect growth.
`EB treatment caused a significant increase in uterine
`weight. As in other species (22, 28, 29), 1C1 182,780 had
`no uterotrophic effect, and at this dose, the antiestrogen
`partially antagonized the effect of EB on uterine weight
`(Fig. 4).
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 2
`
`

`

`Carcass water (9)
`
`Carcass lipid (9)
`
`For-free dry wt. lg)
`
`Parametric! WAT (g)
`
`Reigoparit. WAT {g}
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`R1401
`
` c
`
`Oil
`
`EB (Cl EB+
`ICI
`
`Oll
`
`EB
`
`ICI EB+
`|C|
`
`b
`
`l8
`
`12
`6
`
`Oil
`
`EB ICI EB+
`|Cl
`
`Fig. 3. Terminal carcass composition of ovariectomized hamsters
`treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml), EB (5 cg/day}, ICI (250 ug/
`day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. Bars with different letters are signifi-
`cantly different (P < 0.05).
`
`Estrous Behavior
`
`Treatment with ICI 182,780, given alone or in combi-
`nation with progesterone, did not induce any signs of
`sexual receptivity in ovariectomized hamsters (data not
`shown). However, ICI 182,780 did inhibit estrous behav-
`ior induced by treatment with either EB plus progeste-
`rone or EB alone. ICI 182.780 significantly increased
`lordosis latency and decreased lordosis duration in ham-
`sters treated with EB for 2 days followed by progesterone
`(Fig. 5, top). In hamsters given EB for 23 days, concur-
`rent
`treatment With ICI 182,780
`significantly de-
`creased lordosis duration but did not affect latency (Fig.
`5, bottom).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`These findings confirm a number of the unusual prop-
`erties of ICI 182,780. As in other species (22, 28, 29),
`ICI 182,780 appears to be a pure antiestrogen in Syrian
`hamsters. It at least partially antagonized the actions of
`estradiol on body weight, body composition,
`linear
`growth, estrous behavior, and uterine weight without
`having any agonistic (estrogenic) effects when given by
`itself to ovariectomized animals. The present results also
`support the conjecture that ICI 182,780 does not act di-
`rectly in the brain. As in rats (22), pretreatment with
`radioinert ICI 182,780, significantly reduced in vivo cell
`nuclear binding of [31-I]estradiol in uterus but not in
`pooled hypothalamus-preoptic area. Taken together,
`these two findings suggest that ICI 182,780 can he used as
`an experimental tool to dissociate central and peripheral
`actions of estradiol.
`The fact that ICI 182,780 attenuated the effects of es-
`tradiol treatment on body weight and fat content is con-
`sistent With our assertion (23, 26) that ovarian steroids
`act both centrally and peripherally to affect energy bal~
`ance. Several lines of work support the idea of distinct
`central and peripheral sites of estrogen action on energy
`balance in rats (22, 23, 26), but this appears to be the first
`evidence for this possibility in hamsters.
`The fact that treatment with ICI 182,780 completely
`blocked the effects of estradiol on linear growth (change
`in naso-anal length) may indicate that estrogen effects on
`growth are predominantly clue to nonneural actions of the
`steroid in hamsters. On the other hand, treatment with
`ICI 182,780 did not attenuate the suppressive effects of
`estradiol on food intake in hamsters. Thus it is likely that
`estradiol action in the brain is sufficient to decrease food
`
`1.00
`
`.50
`
`.25
`
`on
`
`EB
`
`ICI on
`1::
`
`on
`
`EB
`
`lC| EB+
`no:
`
`Growth (mm)
`
`o
`
`G
`
`G
`
`b
`
`B
`o
`
`4
`
`2
`
`.500
`.375
`
`.230
`
`.125
`
`"on re
`
`ICI ref
`no
`
`Uterus (g)
`b
`
`
`
`on
`
`re
`
`1:: 53+
`no
`
`Fig. 4. Terminal Weights of parametrial and retroperitoneal white adi-
`pose tissue (WAT) and uterus and change in naso-anal length (growth)
`of ovariectomized hamsters treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml), EB
`(5 pg/day), ICI (250 pg/day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. Ears with differ-
`ent letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
`
`Es+rodio|+progesterone:
`it
`Latency (sac)
`Duration (sec)
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`"‘
`
`120
`
`80
`
`40
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`ICI
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`ICI
`
`Estradiol alone:
`Latency [sec]
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`Duration (sec)
`
`
`
`so
`
`40
`
`EB
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`EB+
`ICI
`ICI
`Fig. 5. Effects of ICI on estrous behavior in ovariectomized hamsters.
`Top: animals were injected with EB (5 ng) or EB plus ICI (250 Hg) for
`2 days followed by 200 pg progesterone on 3rd day, 4-5 h before testing.
`Bottom: animals were injected with EB or EB plus ICI for 23 days before
`testing. * P -< 0.05 vs. EB-treated group.
`
`intake and that no peripheral actions are required. How-
`ever, we cannot exclude the possibility that a higher dose
`of ICI 182,780 than that used in this study would be
`sufficient to antagonize the effects of estradiol on food
`intake in hamsters.
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 3
`
`

`

`R1402
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`These findings in hamsters contrast with those in rate
`where ICI 182,780 treatment actually potentiated the es-
`tradiol-induced decreases in food intake (22). We sug-
`gested that in rats this action of ICI 182,780 could be due
`to the induction of a “pharmacological hysterectomy,”
`because surgical hysterectomy enhances behavioral re-
`sponsiveness to estradiol in this species (1, 20). In con-
`trast, surgical hysterectomy does not potentiate estradiol-
`induced sexual receptivity in hamsters (19),
`just as
`ICI 182,780 treatment does not potentiate the estradiol-
`induced decrease in food intake. Therefore, the difference
`between rats and hamsters in the effects of ICI 182,780
`on food intake may be a reflection of the species differ-
`ence in the actions of the uterus on behavioral respon-
`siveness to estradiol.
`
`ICI 182,780 attenuated the induction of estrous behav-
`ior, either by sequential treatments with estradiol and
`progesterone or by prolonged (23 days) treatment with
`estradiol alone. Thus, in hamsters, as in rats (22), estra-
`diol appears to act peripherally, as well as centrally(2, 4,
`21). to facilitate estrous behavior. We have suggested
`that in rats, ICI 182,780 could attenuate sexual receptiv-
`ity at least in part by blocking the effects of estradiol
`on peripheral sensory fields that are important for es-
`trous responsiveness (10, 11). Similar work examining
`the effects of ovarian steroids on peripheral sensory
`fields has not yet been done in hamsters, but it is known
`that
`sornatosensory cues
`from the perineal
`region
`play a significant role in hamster copulatory behavior
`(15, 16}.
`are possible,
`comparisons
`that
`extent
`To the
`ICI 182,780 may be more effective at inhibiting estrous
`behavior in hamsters than in rats (22). If this is in fact
`the case, the uterus might play a role in this species dif-
`ference, because surgical hysterectomy potentiates the
`effects of estradiol on sexual receptivity in rats but not
`in hamsters (1, 19). Thus in rats ICI 182,780 could con-
`currently inhibit estrous behavior
`(perhaps by inhi-
`biting an action of estradiol on peripheral sensory
`fields) and facilitate estrous behavior (via a pharmaco-
`logical hysterectomy facilitating estrogen action in
`the brain). According to this hypothesis, only the inhibi-
`Lory actions would be evident in hamsters.
`It appears as though the dose of ICI 182,780 we have
`used (250 pg/day) is more effective in reducing uterine
`weight and in vivo cell nuclear uptake of l3H]estradiol in
`rats than in hamsters (22). At this time it is not clear
`whether this effect is due to 1) species differences in
`ICl182,780 absorption, delivery, or clearance; 2) dif-
`ferences in affinity for estrogen receptors; or 3) some
`other factor(s). Differences in the EB doses that were
`used (2 pg in rats, 5 ug in hamsters) could explain the
`differences in the inhibition of uterine weight but can-
`not account for the differences in inhibition of [3H]es-
`tradiol binding. Whatever the basis for this species dif-
`ference in ICI 182,780 potency in the uterus, the impor-
`tant point remains that
`in both rats and hamsters
`treatment with ICI 182,780 attenuates the effects of es-
`tradiol on energy balance and on estrous behavior with-
`out interfering with neural estrogen binding. Therefore,
`these results support the hypothesis that estradiol affects
`
`energy balance and estrous behavior via both neural and
`nonneural sites of action.
`
`We are grateful to Jay Alexander, Robin Lempicki, and Joanne Tur-
`cotte for their expert technical assistance and to Alan E. Wakeling of
`Zeneca (ICI) Pharmaceuticals for the gift of ICI 182,780.
`This work was supported by Research Grants N340873. DK-32976,
`and NS-19327, by Research Scientist Award MH-00321, and by Re-
`search Scientist Development Award MH-00885 from the National 111-
`stitutes of Health.
`Address reprint requests to G. N. “fade, Dept. of Psychology, Univ.
`of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.
`Received 8 March 1993; accepted in final form 5 May 1993.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Ahdieh, H. B., and G. N. Wade. Effects of hysterectomy on
`sexual receptivity, food intake, running wheel activity, and hypo-
`thalamic estrogen and progestin receptors in rats. J. Comp.
`Physiol. Psychol 96: 886-892, 1982.
`2. Barfield, R. J., B. S. Rubin, J. H. Glaser, and P. G. Davis.
`Sites of action of ovarian hormones in the regulation of oestrous
`responsiveness in rats. In: Hormones and Behaviour in Higher
`Vertebrates. edited by J. Balthazart. E. Prove, and R. Gilles. Ber-
`lin; Springer-Verlag, 1983, p. 2-17.
`3. Bhatia, A. J ., and G. N. Wade. Effects of pregnancy and ovar-
`ian steroids on fatty acid synthesis and uptake in Syrian hamsters.
`Am. J. Physiol. 260 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 29):
`R153-R158. 1991.
`4. Blaustein, J. 1)., and D. H. Olster. Gonadal steroid hormone
`receptors and social behaviors. In: Advances in Comparative and
`Environmental Physiology, edited by J. Balthazart. Berlin:
`Springer-Verlag, 1989, vol. 3, p. 31-104.
`5. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for quantifica-
`tion of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of
`protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248-254, 1975.
`6. Butera, P. 0., and R. J. Beikirch. Central
`implants of
`diluted estradiol: independent effects on ingestive and reproduc-
`tive behaviors of ovariectomized rats. Brain Res. 491: 268-273,
`1939.
`
`7. Butera, P. C., D. M. Willard, and S. A. Raymond. Effects of
`PVN lesions on the responsiveness of female rats to estradiol.
`Brain Res. 576: 304-310. 1992.
`8. Gentry, R. T.. G. N. Wade, and E. J. Roy. Individual differ-
`ences in estradiol-induced behaviors and in neural “H-estradiol
`uptake in rats. Physfol. Behou. 17: 195-200, 1976.
`9. Kennedy, G. C. Hypothslamic control of the endocrine and be-
`havioural changes associated with oestrus in the rat. J. Physiol.
`Land. 172: 383-392, 1964.
`10. Komisaruk, B. R., N. T. Adler, and J. Hutchinson. Genital
`sensory field: enlargement by estrogen treatment in female rats.
`Science Wash. DC 178: 1295-1298, 1972.
`11. Kow, L.-M., and D. W. Pfaff. Effects of estrogen treat-
`ment on the size of receptive field and response threshold of
`pudenda] nerve in the female rat. Neuroendocrinulogy 13: 299-313.
`1973.
`
`12. Law, 'I‘., and W. Meagher. Hypothalamic lesions and sexual
`behavior in the female rat. Science Wash. DC 128: 1626-1627,
`1958.
`
`13. Meisel, R. L., G. P. Dohanich, B. S. McEWen, and D. W.
`Pfaff. Antagonism of sexual behavior in female rats by ventra-
`lnedial hypothalamic implants of antiestrogen. Neu.roendocrin.of-
`ogy 45: 20l—207, 1987.
`14. Morin, L. P.. J. B. Powers. and M. White. Effects of the
`antiestrugens, MER-25 and CI-628, on ml. and hamster lordosis.
`Horm. Behau. T: 283-291, 1976.
`15. Noble, R. G. The sexual responses of the female hamster; a
`descriptive analysis. Physiol. Bchav. 23: 1001-1004, 1979.
`16. Noble, R. G. Sex responses of the female hamster: effects on male
`performance. Physiol. Behau. 24: 237-242, 1980.
`17. Roy, E. J., and G. N. Wade. Binding of [-’-‘H]estradiol by brain
`cell nuclei and female rat sexual behavior: inhibition by antiesrro
`
`Astrazeneca Ex.2109 p.4
`
`

`

`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`R1403
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`gens. Brain Res. 126: 73-87, 1977.
`Rubin, B. S. , and R. J. Barfield. Priming of estrous respon-
`siveness by implants of 17,3—est1-acliol in the ventromedial hypo-
`thalamic nucieua of rats. Endocrinology 106: 5044909, 1980.
`Siege], H. 1-, P. Cohen, and J. S. Rosenhlatt. The effect of
`hysterectomy on hormone-induced lordosis behavior in hamsters.
`Physiol. Beiuw. 23: 851—8-53, 1979.
`Siegel, H. I., and J. S. Rosenblatt. Estrogen-induced maternal
`behaviors in ovariectomized—hystereotomizod virgin rats. Physiol.
`Bel/uw. 11: 273v2'73, 1978.
`regulation of sociosexual be-
`Talmhashi, L. K. Hormonal
`havior in female mammals. Neurosci. Biobehcw. Rev. 14: 403-413,
`1990.
`Wade, G. N., J. D. Blaustein, J. M. Gray, and J. M.
`Meredith. ICI 182,780: a pure antieatrogen that affects behaviors
`and energy balance in rats without acting in the brain. Am. J.
`Physiol_ 255 (Regu.Lcn‘.ory lnxegronue Comp. Phyminl. 34): R339}!-
`R1398, 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. M. Gray. Gonadal efifects on food intake
`and acéiposity: a metabolic hypothesis. Physiol. Behou. 22: 583-
`593, 1. 79.
`Wade, G. N., and H. W. Heller. Tamoxifen mimics the effects
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`'29.
`
`30.
`
`of estradiol on food intake, body weight, and body composition in
`rats. Am, J. Physiol. 264 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol.
`33): R1219—R1223, 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. B. Powers. Tamoxifen antagonizes the
`effects of estradiol on energy balance and estrous behavior in
`Syrian hamsters. Am. J. Physiot. 265 (Regulatory Integrative
`Comp. Physiol. 34): R559—R5E2. 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. E. Schneider. Metabolic fuels and repro~
`duction in female mammals. Neurosci. Biobelwv. Rev. 16: 235 272,
`1992.
`Wade, G. N., and I. Zucker. Modulation of food intake and
`locomotor activity in female rats by diencephalic hormone im-
`plants. J. Comp. Physiul. Psychol. 72: 328-336, 1970.
`Wakeling, A. E., and J. Bowler. ICI-182,780, a new antioes-
`trogen with clinical potential. J. Steroid Biachem. Mol. Biol. 43:
`173-177, 1.992.
`Wakeling, A. E., M. Dukes, and J. Bowler. A potent specific
`pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res. 51: 3867-
`3873, 1991.
`Zigmond, R. E., and B. S. Mcliwen. Selective retention of
`oestradiol by cell nuclei in specific brain regions of the ovariecto—
`mized rat. J. Neurochem. 17: 3B9—899, 1970.
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket