throbber
Editor: Donna Balado
`
`Managing Editor: Jennifer Schmidt
`Marketing Manager: Christine Kushner
`
`Copyright © 1999 Lippincott Wflliams & Willdns
`
`351 West Camden Street
`Baltimore, Maryland 21201-2436 USA
`
`227 East Washington Square
`Philadelphia, PA 19106
`
`All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be re-
`produced in any form or by any means, including photocopying, or utilized by any infor-
`mation storage and retrieval systemwithout written permission from the copyright owner.
`
`The publisher is not responsible (as a matter of product liability, negligence, or otherwise)
`for any injury resulting from any material contained herein. This publication contains in-
`formation relating to general principles of medical care which should not be construed as
`specific instructions for individual patients. Manufacturers’product information and pack-
`age inserts should be reviewed for current information, including contraindications,
`dosages, and precautions.
`
`Printed in the United States ofAmerica
`
`Library of Congress Cata1oging-in-Publication Data
`
`Ansel, Howard C., 1933-
`Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delievery systems / Howard C.
`Ansel, LoydV. Allen, Jr., Nicholas G. Popovich. —— 7th ed.
`p.
`cm.
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`ISBN 0-683-30572-7
`2. Drug delivery systems.
`1. Drugs—-Dosage forms.
`II. Popovich, Nicholas G.
`III. Title.
`[DNLM: 1. Dosage Forms.
`2. Drug Delivery Systems. QV 785 A618i 1999]
`RS200.A57
`1999
`615’.1—dc21
`DNLM/DLC
`for Library of Congress
`
`1. Allen, LoydV.
`
`99-17498
`CH’
`
`The publishers have made every eflort to trace the copyright holders for borrowed material. Ifthey
`have inadvertently overlooked any, they will be pleased to make the necessary arrangements at
`the first opportunity.
`-
`
`The use of portions of the text of USP23/NF18, copyright 1994, is by permission of the USP
`Convention, Inc. The Convention is not responsible for any inaccuracy of quotation or for
`any false or misleading implication that may arise from separation of excerpts from the
`original context or by obsolescence resulting from publication of a supplement.
`
`To purchase additional copies of this book call our customer service department at (800)
`638-3030 or fax orders to (301) 824-7390. International customers should call (301)
`714-2324.
`
`99 00 01 02
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2102 p. 2
`
`

`
`
`
`Contents
`
`Preface
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`Section I. PRINCIPLES OF DOSAGE FORM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
`
`I
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Introduction to Drugs and Pharmacy
`
`New Drug Development and Approval Process
`
`Dosage Form Design: Pharmaceutic and
`Formulation Considerations
`-
`
`Dosage Form Design: Biopharrnaceutic and
`Pharmacokinetic Considerations
`
`Current Good Manufacturing Practices and Good
`Compounding Practices
`
`Section II. SOLID DOSAGE FORMS AND MODIFIED-RELEASE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Powders and Granules
`
`Capsules and Tablets
`
`’
`
`Modified~Release Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems
`
`Section III. SEMI-SOLID AND TRANSDERMAL SYSTEMS
`
`9
`
`I0
`
`Ointments, Creams, and Gels
`
`Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`v
`
`vii
`
`1
`
`23
`
`60
`
`101
`
`142
`
`164
`
`179
`
`229
`
`_
`
`244
`
`263
`
`ix"
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2102 p. 3
`
`

`
`x
`
`Contents
`
`Section IV. PHARMA(EUIICAL INSERIS
`
`II
`
`Suppositories and Inserts
`
`Section V. LIQUID DOSAGE FORMS
`
`I 2
`
`I3
`
`Solutions
`
`Disperse Systems
`
`Section VI. SIERILE DOSAGE FORMS AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS
`
`I 4
`
`Parenterals
`
`I 5
`
`I6
`
`Biologicals
`
`Ophthalmic Solutions and Suspensions
`
`Section VII. NOVEL AND ADVANCED DOSAGE FORMS, DELIVERY SYSTEMS, AND DEVICES
`
`Radiopharmaceuticals
`
`Products of Biotechnology
`
`Novel Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Technologies
`
`Systems and Techniques of Pharmaceutical Measurement
`
`I 7
`
`I8
`
`I9
`
`Appendix
`
`Index
`
`279
`
`296
`
`346
`
`397
`
`450
`
`469
`
`487
`
`503
`
`535
`
`552
`
`563
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2102 p. 4
`
`

`
` TRANSDERMAL DRUG
`
`DELIVERY SYSTEMS
`
`
`
`Chapter at a Glance
`
`Factors Affecting Percutaneous Absorption
`Percutaneous Absorption Enhancers
`Chemical Enhancers
`
`lontophoresis and Sonophorasis
`Percutaneous Absorption Models
`In Vivo Studies
`In Vitro Studies
`
`Design Features of Transderrnal Drug
`Delivery Systems (TDDSS)
`Advantages and Disadvantages of TDDSS
`Examples of Transderrnal Drug
`Delivery Systems
`
`Tnmsdermal Scopolamine
`Transdermal Nitroglycerin
`Trrmsdermal Clonfdine
`Trcmsdermel Nicotine
`Tmnsdermal Esfmdfol
`Tnmsdermal Testosterone
`
`Other Trcnsdcrmal Therapeutic Systems
`General Clinical Considerations in the Use
`of TDDSs
`
`TRANSDERMAL DRUG delivery systems (TDDSSJ fa-
`cilitate the passage of therapeutic quantifies of
`drug substances through the skin and into the gen-
`eral circulation for their systemic effects. The con-
`cept for the percutaneous absorption of chug sub-
`stances was first conceived by Stoughtori in 1965
`(1). The first transdermal system, Transdeim Scop
`[Ciba (now Novartis)] was approved by the Food
`and Drug Adrninistration in 1979 for the preven-
`tion of nausea and vomiting associated with travel,
`particularly by sea.
`Evidence of percutaneous drug absorption may
`be found through measurable blood levels of the
`drug, detectable excretion of the clnig andlor its
`metabolites in the urine, and through the clinical
`response of the patient to the administered drug
`therapy. With transderrnal drug delivery, the blood
`concentration needed to achieve therapeutic effi-
`cacy may be determined by comparative analysis of
`patient response to drug blood levels. For transder—
`
`rnal drug delivery, it is considered ideal if the drug
`penetrates through the skin to the underlying blood
`supply without drug buildup in the dermal layers
`(2). This is in direct contrast to the types of topical
`dosage forms discussed in the previous chapter, in
`which dlug residence in the skin, the target organ,
`is desired.
`
`As discussed in the previous chapter, the skin is
`comprised of the stratum corneum (the outer layer),
`the living epidermis, and the dermis, which to-
`gether provide the skirfs barrier layers to penetra-
`tion by external agents (see Fig. 9.6).The film that
`covers the stratum corneum is comprised of sebum
`and sweat, but because of its varied composition
`and lack of continuity it is not a significant factor in
`drug penetration nor are the hair follicles and
`sweat and sebaceous gland ducts which comprise
`only a minor proportion of the skin's surface.
`The percutaneous absorption of a dnig generally
`results from the direct penetration of the drug
`
`263
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2102 p. 5
`
`

`
`264
`
`Trrmsdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`through the stratum corneum, a 10 to 15 pm thick
`layer of flat, partially desiccated nonliving tissue
`(3-4). The stratum corneum is composed of ap-
`proximately 40% protein (mainly keratin) and 40%
`water, with the balance being lipid, principally as
`triglycerides, free fatty acids, cholesterol, and phos-
`pholipids. The lipid content is concentrated in the
`extracellular phase of the stratum corneum and
`forms to a large extent the membrane surrounding
`the cells. Because a drug's major route of penetra-
`tion is through the intercellular channels, the lipid
`component is considered an important determi-
`nant in the first step of the absorption process (5).
`Once through the stratum corneum, drug mole-
`cules may then pass through the deeper epidermal
`tissues and into the dermis. When the drug reaches
`the vascularized dermal layer, it becomes available
`for absorption into the general circulation.
`The stratum corneum, being keratinized tissue,
`behaves as a semipermeable artificial membrane,
`and drug molecules penetrate by passive diffusion.
`It is the major rate-limiting barrier to transderrnal
`drug transport (6). Over most of the body, the stra-
`tum comeurn has 15-25 layers of flattened con'Leo-
`cytes with an overall thickness of about 10 um (6).
`The rate of drug movement across this skin layer
`depends on the drug concentration in the vehicle,
`its aqueous solubility, and the oil/water partition
`coefficient between the suatum corneum and the
`
`vehicle ('7). Substances that possess both aqueous
`and lipid solubility characteristics are good candi-
`dates for diffusion through the stratum corneum as
`well as through the epidermal and dermal layers.
`
`Factors Affecting
`Percutaneous Absorption
`
`Not all drug substances are suitable for transder—
`rnal drug delivery. Among the factors playing a part
`in percutaneous absorption are the physical and
`chemical properties of the drug, including its mol-
`ecular weight, solubility, partitioning coefficient and
`pKa, the nature of the carrier—vehicle and the con-
`dition of the skin. Although general statements ap-
`plicable to all possible combinations of drug, vehi-
`cle, and skin condition are difficult to draw, the
`consensus of the majority of research findings may
`be summarized as follows (2-11).
`
`1. Drug concentration is an important factor. Gen-
`erally, the amount of drug percutaneously ab-
`sorbed per unit of surface area per time interval
`increases as the concentration of the drug sub-
`stance in the TDDS is increased.
`
`2. More drug is absorbed through percutaneous
`absorption when the drug substance is applied
`to a larger surface area (eg, a larger size TDDS).
`3. The drug substance should have a greaterphysio
`ochernical attraction to the skin than to the vehi-
`
`cle in which it is presented for the drug to leave
`the vehicle in favor of the skin. Some solubility of
`the drug in both lipid and water is thought to be
`essential for effective percutaneous absorption.
`In essence, the aqueous solubility of a drug de-
`termines the concentration presented to the ab-
`sorption site and the partition coefficient influ-
`ences the rate of transport across the absorption
`site. Drugs generally penetrate through the skin
`better in their unionized form. Polar drugs tend
`to cross the cell barrier through the lipid-rich re-
`gions (transcellular route) whereas the nonpolar
`drugs favor transport between cells (intercellular
`route) (6).
`4. Drugs with molecular weights between 100 and
`800 with adequate lipid and aqueous solubility
`can permeate skin. The ideal molecular weight
`of a drug for transdermal drug delivery is be-
`lieved to be 400 or less.
`
`5. The hydration of the skin generally favors per-
`cutaneous absorption. TDDS act as occlusive
`moisture barriers through which the sweat from
`the skin cannot pass, resulting in increased skin
`hydration.
`6. Percutaneous absorption appears to be greater
`when the TDDS is applied to a skin site with a
`thin horny layer than with one that is thick.
`7. Generally, the longer the period of time the
`medicated application is permitted to remain in
`contact with the skin, the greater will be the to-
`tal drug absorption.
`
`These general statements on percutaneous ab-
`sorption apply to skin in the normal state. Skin that is
`abraded or cut will pennit drugs to gain direct access
`to the subcutaneous tissues and the capillary network
`obviating the designed function of the TDDS.
`
`Percutaneous Absorption Enhancers
`
`There is great interest among pharmaceutical
`scientists to develop chernical permeation enhancers
`and physical methods that can increase the percu-
`taneous absorption of therapeutic agents.a
`
`Chemical Enhancers
`
`By definition, a chemical skin penetration en-
`hancer increases skin permeability by reversibly dam-
`
`Astraleneca Ex. 2102 p. 6
`
`

`
`aging or by altering the physicochemical mature of the
`stratum corneum to reduce its dflfusioncl resistance
`(12). Among the alterations are increased hydration
`of the stratum corneum andfor a change in the
`structure of the lipids and lipoproteins in the inter-
`cellular channels through solvent action or denat-
`uralion (4, 13-17).
`Some drugs have an inherent capacity to perme-
`ate the skin without need of chemical enhancers.
`However, in instances in which this is not the case,
`chemical permeation enhancers may be effective in
`rendering an otherwise irnpenauable substance use-
`ful in Iransdermal drug delivery (17). More than 275
`different chemical compounds have been cited in
`the literature as skin penetration enhancers includ-
`ing acetone, azone, dirnethylacetarnide, dlmethyl—
`formamide, dirnethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol,
`oleic acid, polyethylene glycol, propylene glycol and
`sodium lauryl sulfate (13-15) . The selection of a per-
`meation enhancer in developing aTDDS should be
`based not only on its efficacy in enhancing skin per-
`meation, but also on its dennal toxicity (low), and its
`physicochemical and biocompatibility with the sys-
`tems other components (16).
`
`Ioutophoresis and Sonophoresis
`
`In addition to chemical means, there are some
`physical methods being used to enhance trans-
`dermal drug delivery and penetration, namely,
`iontophoresis and sonophoresis (6,15,18—23). Ion-
`tophoresis involves the delivery of charged chemical
`compounds across the skin membrane using an
`applied electrical field. A number of drugs have
`been the subject of such iontophoretic studies,
`including lidocaine (18), dexarnethasone, amino
`acidsfpeptideslirisulin (19-20), verapamil (6), and
`propranolol (21). There is particular interest to de-
`velop alternative routes for the delivery of biologi-
`cally active peptides. These agents are presently
`delivered by injection, because of their rapid Ine-
`tabolism and poor absorption after oral delivery.
`They are also poorly absorbed from the transcler-
`rnal route, because of their large molecular size,
`ionic character and the general impenetrability of
`the skin (20). However, iontophoretic-enhanced
`transdermal delivery has shown some promise as a
`means for peptideiprotein administration.
`Sonoplroresis, or high-frequency ultrasound, is
`also being studied as a means to enhance lII'<':L'f'|.SClEi'—
`rnal drug delivery (22—-23). Among the agents ex-
`amined have been hydrocortisone, lidocaine, and
`salicylic acid in such formulations as gels, creams,
`and lotions. It is thought that hjgh—frequency ultra-
`
`Tmnsdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`265
`
`sound can influence the integrity of the stratum
`corneum and thus affect its penetrability.
`
`Percutaneous Absorption Models
`
`Skin permeability and percutaneous absorption
`have been the subject of numerous studies under-
`taken to define the underlying principles and to
`optimize transderrnal drug delivery. Although many
`experimental methods and models have been used,
`they tend to fall into one of two categories: 1) in
`vivo, and 2) in vino studies.
`
`In Vivo Studies
`
`In vivo skin-penetration studies may be under-
`taken for one or more of the following purposes (24):
`
`1. To verify and quantify the cutaneous bioavail-
`ability of a topically applied drug;
`2. To verify and quantify the systemic bioavailabil-
`ity of a transdermally delivered drug;
`3. To establish bioequivalence of different topical
`formulations of the same drug substance;
`4. To determine the incidence and degree of sys-
`temic toxicologic risk following the topical ap-
`plication of a specific dnigtdrug product; and
`5. To relate resultant blood levels of drug in human
`to systemic therapeutic effects.
`
`The most relevant studies are performed in hu-
`mans; however, animal models may be used inso-
`far as they may be effective as predictors of human
`response. Animal models include the weanling pig,
`rhesus Toonlcey, and hairless mouse or rat (24-25).
`Biological samples used in drug penetrationldrug
`absorption studies include skin sections, venous
`blood from the application site, blood from the sys-
`temic circulation and excreta (urine, feces and ex-
`pired air) (24-28).
`
`In Vitro Studies
`
`Skin permeation testing may be performed in
`vitro using various skin tissues (human or animal
`whole sl<'.in, dermis or epidermis) in a diffusion cell
`(29). In vitro penetration studies using human skin
`are limited because of difficulties of procurement,
`storage, expense, and variability in permeation (30).
`Excised animal skins may also be variable in qual-
`ity and permeation. Animal skins are much more
`permeable than human skin. One alternative that
`has been shown to be effective is shed snake skin
`
`(Elaplre obsolete, black rat snake), which is nonliv—
`
`Astraleneca Ex. 2102 p. 7
`
`

`
`266
`
`Tnmsdemral Drug Delivery Systems
`
`ing, pure stratum corneum, hairless, and similar to
`human skin, but slightly less permeable (3041).
`Also, the product Living Skin Equivalent (LSE)
`Testskin (Organogenesis, Inc.) was developed as an
`alternative for dermal absorption studies. The ma-
`terial is an organotypic coculture of human dermal
`fibroblasts in a collagen-containing matrix and a
`Stratified epidermis composed of human epidermal
`keratinocytes. The material may be used in cell cul-
`ture studies or in standard diffusion cells.
`
`Diffusion cell systems are employed in vitro to
`quantify the release rates of drugs from topical
`preparations (32), In these systems, skin mem-
`branes or synthetic membranes may be employed
`as barriers to the flow of drug and vehicle, to sim-
`ulate the biologic system. The typical diffusion cell
`has two chambers one on each side of the test dif-
`
`fusion membrane. A temperature—controlled solu-
`tion of the drug to be contained in the TDDS is
`placed in one chamber and a receptor solution in
`the other chamber. When skin is used as the test
`
`membrane, it separates the two solutions. Drug clif-
`tusion through the skin may be determined by per
`iodic sampling and assay of the drug content in the
`receptor solution. The skin may also be analyzed for
`drug content to show drug permeation rates and/or
`drug retention in the skin (29).
`The USP describes the apparatus and procedure
`to determine the drug dissolution (drug release) of
`medication from a transdermai delivery system and
`provides an ”Accepta.nCe Table” against which the
`product must conform to meet the monograph stan-
`dard for a given article (33). Commercial systems are
`available that utilize transdermal diffusion cells and
`
`autosarnplingsystems to determine the release rates
`of drugs from transderrnal systems (34).
`
`Design Features of Transdermal Drug
`Delivery Systems (TDDSs)
`
`Transdermal drug delivery systems (also often
`called transdermal”patches”) are designed to sup-
`port the passage of drug substances from the sur-
`face of the skin, through its various layers and into
`the systemic circulation. Examples of the configu-
`ration and composition ofTDDSs are described in
`the text, presented in Table 10.1 and shown in
`Figures 10.1 through 10.4. Figures 10.5 through
`10.8 depict the manufacture of TDDSs. Technically,
`TDDSs may be categorized into two types, mono-
`lithic and membrane—contro1led systems.
`Monolithic systems incorporate a drug matrix
`layer between backing and frontal layers (Fig. 10-3).
`The drug-matrix layer is composed of a polymeric
`
`material in which the drug is dispersed. The poly-
`mer matrix controls the rate at which the drug is
`released for percutaneous absorption. The matrix
`may be of two types; with or without an excess of
`drug with regard to its equilibrium solubility and
`steady-state concentration gradient at the stratum
`corneum (21,35). In types having no excess, drug is
`available to maintain the saturation of the stratum
`
`corneum only as long as the level of drug in the de-
`vice exceeds the solubility limit of the stratum
`corneum. As the concentration of drug in the de-
`vice diminishes below the skin's saturation limit,
`the transport of drug from device to skin gradually
`declines (35). In systems that have an excess amount
`of drug present in the matrix, a drug reserve is pres-
`ent to assure continued drug saturation at
`the
`stratum comeum. In these instances, the rate of
`drug decline is less than in the type having no drug
`reserve.
`
`In the preparation of monolithic systems, the
`drug and the polymer are dissolved or blended to-
`gether, cast as the matrix and dried (21).The gelled
`matrix may be produced in sheet or cylindrical
`form, with individual dosage units cut and asserti-
`bled between the backing and frontal layers. Most
`TDDSs are designed to contain an excess of drug
`and thus have drug-releasing capacity beyond the
`time frame recommended for replacement. This
`ensures continuous drug availability and absorp-
`tion as used TDDSs are replaced on schedule with
`fresh ones.
`
`Membrane—controlled transderrnal systems are
`designed to contain a drug reservoir or "pouch”,
`usually in liquid or gel form, a rate~controlling
`membrane, and backing, adhesive, and protecting
`layers (Fig. 10—2). 'I‘ransderrn—Nitro (Novartis) and
`Transderm-Scop (Novartis) are examples of this
`technology. Membrane—controllecl systems have the
`advantage over monolithic systems in that as long
`as the drug solution in the reservoir remains
`saturated, the release rate of drug through the con-
`trolling membrane remains constant (21-22). In
`membrane systems, a small quantity of dmg is fre-
`quently placed in the adhesive layer to initiate
`prompt drug absorption and pharrnacotherapeutic
`effects on skin placement. Membrane-controlled
`Systems may be prepared by preconstructlng the
`delivery unit, filling the drug reservoir, and sealing,
`or by a process of lamination, which involves a con-
`tinuous process of constructiomdosing and sealing
`(Figs. 10.5 through 10.8).
`In summary, either the drug delivery device or
`the skin may serve as the rate-controlling mecha-
`nism in drug transport from transderrnal systems.
`
`Astraleneca Ex. 2102 p. 8
`
`

`
`Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`267
`
`
`
`
`
` Therapeutic Agent TDDS Design/Contents Comments
`
`Table 10.1. Examples of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (40-44, 47~51}
`
`Clonidone
`Catapres—’ITS
`Four-layered patch: (1) a
`Transdermal therapeutic systems
`(Boelninger Ingelheim)
`backing layer of pigmented
`designed to deliver a therapeutic
`polyester film; (2) drug
`dose of the antihypertensive
`reservoir of clonidine,
`drug clonidine at a constant
`mineral oil, polyisobutylene,
`rate for 7 days, permitting
`and colloidal silicon
`once-a—weel< dosing.TDDS
`dioxide;' (3) a microporous
`generally applied to hairless or
`polypropylene membrane
`shaven areas of upper arm or
`controlling the rate of drug
`torso.
`delivery; and (4) an
`adhesive fonnulation of
`
`Estradiol
`
`Estraderrn (Novartis)
`
`Vivelle (Novartis)
`
`Climara (Berlex)
`
`Fentanyl
`
`Duragesic (lanssenju
`
`agents noted in (2) above.
`
`Four-layered patch: (1) a
`transparent polyester film;
`(2) drug reservoir of estradiol
`and alcohol gelled with
`hydroxypropyl cellulose;
`(3) an ethylene-vinyl acetate
`copolymer membrane; and
`(4) an adhesive formulation
`of light mineral oil and
`polyisobutylene
`
`'['hree—layered patch: (1) a
`translucent ethylene vinyl
`alcohol copolymer film;
`(2) eslxadiol in a matrix of a
`medical adhesive of
`
`polyisobutylene and ethylene
`vinylacetate copolymer; and
`(3) a polyester release liner
`which is removed prior to
`application.
`
`Three—layered system: (1) a
`translucent polyethylene film;
`(2) acrylate adhesive matrix
`containing estradiol; and
`(3) a protective liner of
`siliconized or iluoropolyrner—
`coated polyester film which
`is removed prior to use.
`
`Fourjlayered patch (1) a
`backing layer of polyester
`film; (2) drug reservoir of
`fentanyl and alcohol gelled
`with hydroxyethyl cellulose;
`(3) a rate—cc-ntrolling
`ethylene-vinyl acetate
`copolyrner membrane; and
`(4) a fentanyl-containing
`silicone adhesive.
`
`Transdermal system designed to
`release 17B-estradiol
`continuously. The Iransdermal
`patch is generally applied twice
`weekly over a cycle of 3 weeks
`with dosage frequency adjusted
`as required. The patch is
`generally applied to the trunk
`including the abdomen and
`buttocks, alternating sites with
`each application.
`
`Use and application is similar to
`the Estraderm TDDS.
`
`Use and application similar to the
`Estraderm TDDS. System may
`be applied once weekly.
`
`Transdermal therapeutic system
`providing continuous 72-hour
`systemic delivery of Eentanyl, a
`potent opioid analgesic.'l'he
`drug is indicated in patients
`having chronic pain requiring
`opioid analgesia.
`
`continued
`
`Astraleneca Ex. 2102 p. 9
`
`

`
`Comments
`
`Transdermal therapeutic
`systems providing
`continuous release
`
`and systemic delivery
`of nicotine as an aid
`
`in smoking cessation
`programs.The patches
`listed vary somewhat in
`nicotine content and
`
`dosing schedules.
`
`268
`
`Tmnsdenmtl Drug Delivery Systems
`
`Therapeutic Agent
`Nicotine
`
`Table 10.1. Examples ofTra11sdermal Drug Delivery Systems (40-44, 47-51)
`TDDS
`
`Design/Contents
`
`Habitrol (Novartis
`Consumer)
`
`NicoDerm CQ
`(SmithKline Beecham
`Consumer)
`
`Nicotrol (McNeil
`Consumer)
`
`Prostep (Lederle)
`
`MuIti—Iayered round patch:
`(1) an aluminized backing
`film; (2) a pressure—sensitive
`acrylate adhesive; (3)
`methacryciic acid copolymet
`solution of nicotine dispersed
`in a pad of rioriwoven viscose
`and cotton; (4) an acrylate
`adhesive layer; and (5) a
`protective aluminized release
`liner that overlays the
`adhesive layer and is removed
`prior to use.
`
`Multi-layered rectangular patch:
`(1) an occlusive backing of
`polyethyleneiaiuminuml
`polyesterfethylene-vinyl
`acetate copoiymer; (2) drug
`reservoir of nicotine in an
`ethylene vinyl acetate
`copolymer matrix; (3)
`rate—t:onl.'rolling membrane
`of polyethylene; (4)
`polyisobutylene adhesive;
`and (5) protective liner
`removed prior to application.
`
`Muitiwlayered rectangular patch;
`(1) outer backing of laminated
`polyester film; (2) rate~
`controlling adhesive,
`nonwoven material, and
`nicotine; (3) disposable liner
`removed prior to use.
`
`Multi-layered round patch:
`(1) beige-colored foam tape
`and acrylate adhesive; (2)
`backing foil, gelatin and
`low—density polyethylene
`coating; (3) nicotine-gel
`matrix; (4) protective foil
`with well; and (5) release
`liner removed prior to use.
`
`Nitroglycerin
`
`Deponit (Schwarz Pharma) A three-layer system: (1)
`covering foil; (2) nitroglycerin
`matrix with poiyisobutylent;
`adhesive, plasticizer and
`release membrane; and
`(3) protective foil removed
`before use.
`
`continued
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2102 p. 10
`
`

`
`Table 10.1. Examples of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems (40-44, 47-51)
`TDD5
`Tiierapeutic Agent
`Desigir/Contents
`
`Comments
`
`Trrmsdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`269
`
`Nitro—Dur (Key)
`
`Transderm —Nitro
`(Novartis)
`
`Scopolarnine
`
`Transderm Scfip
`(Novartis
`Consumer)
`
`Testosterone
`
`Testoderm (Alza)
`
`Androderrn
`(SInith.Kline
`Beecharn)
`
`Nitroglycerin in a gel—like
`matrix composed of glycerin,
`water, lactose, polyvinyl
`alcohol, povidone and
`sodium citrate sealed in a
`
`polyester-foil—polyethylene
`laminate.
`
`Fou.r—layered patch: (1) backing
`layer of aluminized plastic;
`(2) drug reservoir containing
`rtitroglycerin adsorbed on
`lactose, colloidal silicon
`dioxide, and silicone medical
`fluid, (3) an ethylene/vinyl
`acetate copolymer membrane;
`and {4} silicone adhesive.
`
`Four—laye1'ed patch: (1) backing
`layer of alurninized polyester
`film; (2) drug reservoir of
`scopolamine, mineral oil, and
`polyisobutylene; (3) a
`rnicroporous polypropylene
`membrane for rate delivery of
`scopolamine; and (4) adhesive
`of polyisobutylene, mineral
`oil, and scopoiamine
`
`Three-layer patch: (1) backing
`layer of polyethylene
`terephthalate; (2) matrix film
`layer of testosterone and
`ethylene—vinyl acetate
`copolymer; and (3) adhesive
`strips of polyisobutylene and
`colloidal silicone clloxide.
`
`Five—layer patch: (1) backing
`film of ethylene vinyl acetate
`copolymerlpolyester laminate;
`(2) drug reservoir gel of
`testosterone, alcohol; glycerin,
`glyceryl monooleate, methyl
`laurate gelled with an acrylic
`acid copolymer; (3) a
`rnicroporous polyethylene
`membrane; (4) acrylic adhesive;
`(5) an adhesive polyester
`laminate.
`
`TDDSS designed to provide
`the controlled release of
`nitroglycerin for treatment
`of angina. Daily application
`to chest, upper arm or
`shoulder.
`
`TDDS for continuous release of
`
`scopolamine over a 3-day period
`as required for the prevention of
`nausea and vomiting associated
`with motion sickness. The patch
`is placed behind the ear. When
`repeated administration is
`desired, the first patch is
`removed and the second patch
`placed behind the other ear.
`Also FDA-approved for
`prevention of nausea associated
`with certain anesthetics and
`analgesics used in surgery.
`
`The patch is placed on the scrotum
`in the treatment of testosterone
`
`deficiency.
`
`The patch is placed on the back,
`abdomen, upper arms or thighs
`in the treatment of testosterone
`
`deficiency.
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2102 p. 11
`
`

`
`270
`
`Trrmsdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`If the drug is delivered to the stratum corneum at a
`rate less than the absorption capacity, the device is
`the controlling factor; if the drug is delivered to the
`skin area to saturation, the skin is the controlling
`
`aaclnmglaw
`Drug ruorbuur
`Mimfiums taruininiw
`rrhomblmu
`Adhnsiuliualmllion
`Shun Sufliel
`
`HI% and
`
`Fig. 10.1 Depiction ofafoimlayeied therapeutic imnsdenmrl
`system showing the mrrtinuous and controlled amount cfmed-
`icai-ion released from the system, penneating the skin and en-
`ter-ing the systemic c-ircrclcztiorz, {Comiesy of/llza Corporzztion.)
`
`factor to the rate of drug absorption. Thus, the rate
`of drug transport in all TDDSS, monolithic and
`membrane, is controlled by either artificial or nat-
`ural (skin) membranes.
`Transderrnal drug delivery systems may be con-
`structed of a number of layers, including 1) an oc-
`clusive backing membrane to protect the system
`from environrnental entry and from loss of drug
`from the system 01' rnoistllre from the skin; 2) a
`drug reservoir or matrix system to store and release
`the drug at the skin—site; 3) a release liner, which is
`removed before application and enables drug re-
`lease; and 4) an adhesive layer to maintain Contact
`with the skin after application. TDDS5 are pack-
`aged in individual sealed packets to preserve and
`protect them until use.
`The backing layer must be occlusive to retain
`skin moisture and hydrate the site of application
`
`backing
`
`drug reservoir
`
`
`
`control membrane
`
`adhesive layer
`
`protective peel strip
`
`Fig. 10.2 The Transderm—Nitro Tiansdermcl Therapeutic System (Summit) The patch delivers nitroglycerin through the skin
`directly into the blood stream for 24 hours. Transderm-Nitra is used to treat and prevent engine. The system consists ofa water-
`resistant backing layer, it resenmir of nitroglycerin, fialloweci by a semipermeable memhmrte to comtml precisely and predictably the
`release ofmerlicine, and an adhesive layer to hold the system onto the skin. The adhesive layer also corrtains an initial priming dose
`ofnil.'roglycerin to insure prompt release and absorption ofthe medfcalion. (Courtesy cfsummii‘ Pharmaceuticals .fNovari'r's]).
`
` 1 FOIL CCNERSTRIP
`
`2 EHUG MATRIX
`1 RELEISE IJNEFI
`I FOII. I-'<SEPU«l'E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Jpggfl POROUS
`E. JESOHEENT PAD
`7 DCCLUBIUE ouenuw
`
`Fig. 10.3 Nii?‘o—DurTransdermal Infusion Sysiem, depfi./flag the construction ofthe product. (Courtesy ofKeyPhcmnaceuticels, Inc.)
`
`AstraZeneca Ex. 2102 p. 12
`
`

`
`Trcmsdermal Drug Delivery Systems
`
`271
`
`(1) Film Backing
`
`(2) Drugmdhesive Layer
`
`(3) Protective Liner
`
`2:1
`
`Fig. 10.4 Depiction ofa two-layered mmsdenmzl drug delivery system, excluding the protective liner which is removed prior to
`application.
`
`enabling increased drug penetration. Preferred back-
`ing materials are approximately 2-3 nun in thick-
`ness and have a low moisture vapor transmission
`rate of approximately <20 g/1n2l24 hr (36). Films of
`polypropylene, polyethylene, and polyolefin which
`are transparent or pigmented are in use in TDDSs
`as backing liners.
`The adhesive layer must be pressure sensitive,
`providing the ability to adhere to the skin with
`minimal pressure and remain in place for the in-
`tended period of wear. The adhesive should be
`nomirritating, allow easy peel-off after use, permit
`unirnpeded drug flux to the skin and must be com-
`patible with all other system components. The ad-
`hesive material is usually safety tested for skin
`compatibility including tests for skin irritation, skin
`sensitivity and cytotoxicity (37). in some 'l‘DDSs,
`:l.'l'1€ drug is contained within the adhesive layer.
`Polybutylacrylate is commonly used as the adhe-
`sive in TDDS3.
`
`The drug release membranes are commonly made
`of polyethylene, with microporous structures of
`varying pore sizes to fit the desired specifications of
`the particular transderrnal system.
`Included among the design objectives of TDDSS
`are the following (2,8,35,38—39).AT'DDS should do
`the following:
`
`1. Deliver the drug at an optimal rate to the skin for
`percutaneous absorption at therapeutic levels;
`2. Contain medicinal agents having the neces-
`sary physicochemical characteristics to release
`from the system and paltition into the stratum
`corneurn;
`
`3. Occlude the skin to ensure the one-way flux of
`the drug into the stratum corneum;
`4. Have a therapeutic advantage over other dosage
`forms and drug delivery systems;
`5. Have components as adhesive, vehicle, and ac-
`tive agent which are not irritating or sensitizing
`to the skin; and
`6. Adhere well to the patient’s skin and have a
`patch-size, appearance, and site-placement that
`encourages patient acceptance.
`
`Fig. 10.5 Pilot scale manufacture of transdermal patches.
`(Courtesy afElan Corporation, pic.)
`
`Advantages and
`Disadvantag

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket