throbber
Cancer Chemothcr Pharmacol (1985) 14 : 274-276
`
`Short communication
`
`'-Cfllancer
`i
`,hemotherapy and
`Rharmacology
`© Springer—Verlag 1985
`
`A pharmacokinetic evaluation of IM administration
`of bleomycin oil suspension
`
`Margaret Davy ‘, Elisabeth Pans‘, Gustav Lehnez
`
`‘ The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
`3 H. Lundbeck Ltd., Oslo, Norway
`
`Summary. Bleomycin oil suspension was given IM twice daily to
`four patients, and bleomycin saline solution infused to three
`patients with cervical carcinoma. The serum levels of bleomycin
`were followed for l2 l1 by radioimmunocssay. Both regimens
`revealed comparable side effects‘. Only minor responses were
`seen. Bleornycin oil suspension produced prolonged levels of
`bleomycin in serum.
`
`Introduction
`
`The antitumor antibiotic bleomycin is effective in treating
`squamous cell carcinomas, malignant lymphomas and testicu-
`lar tumors. In 1976 Samuels et al.
`[11] showed a superior
`clinical response to conrinously infused bleomycin IV com-
`pared to conventional bolus administration in a non-random-
`ised study. This result was confirmed by animal studies
`showing that sustained plasma levels of bleomycin are related
`to enhanced inhibiton of tumor growth [9, 12]. Moreover, less
`toxic effects were seen with the continuous regimen [2]. Lung
`tissue especially was less vulnerable [5, 12]. It is essential to
`avoid exposing the pulmonary circulation to high levels of
`bleomycin as this exerts a direct toxic effect on the capillary
`endothelium.
`
`The rapid renal clearence of bleomycin demands a
`continuous infusion to maintain an adequate blood concen-
`tration. Pharrnacokinetic data obtained in rats, dogs, and
`rabbits show protracted elimination of bleomycin after IM
`administration of bleomycin oil suspension (B08), containing
`15 mg bleomycinlmi
`suspension in sesame oil with 1%
`alurniniurn monostearate as dispersing agent
`We have
`studied the depot properties of this BOS preparation in
`patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. The serum levels of
`bleomycin were measured by a radioimmunoassay utilizing
`radioiodinated bleomycin. No optimal
`therapeutic plasma
`level has been established, but a range of steady state
`concentrations of 10-150 nglml has been reported as thera-
`peutically effective [4, 6].
`
`Patients and methods
`
`Seven ambulatory patients with recurrent squamous cell
`carcinoma of the uterine cervix were studied. All had normal
`renal function. Four were treated with 0.3 ml BOS injections
`IM into the gluteal muscle twice daily (9 mg bleomycin) with a
`
`Ofrforinr requests for: G. Lehne, H. Lundbeck l.td., Box 188, 1324
`Lysaker, Norway
`
`4-h interval in order to mimic the sustained serunl levels
`
`achieved during infusion. Three received a standard regimen
`with 5 mg bleomycin in saline solution IV infused for 4 h. Both
`treatments lasted for 5 days. Blood was taken at hourly
`intervals, beginning just prior to the first bleomycin injection,
`and continuing for 12 h, on days 1 and 5 of therapy. Serum
`samples were stored at -20° C until analysis. Informed consent
`was obtained from all patients.
`
`Assay procedure and calculations. Determination of bleomycin
`in serum was performed with a conventional radioimmunoas-
`say essentially as described by Broughton and Strong [3].
`Bleoruycin obtained from H. Lundbeck Ltd., Copenhagen,
`was iodinated by the iodogen method [8]. The iodination of
`1 pg bleomycin with 0.2 mCi N317-5 I was performed in 0.5 molll
`sodium borate buffer pH 8.5, using 2 pg insolubilized iodogen
`as the oxidant. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 8 min
`at room temperature before separating free from bound
`radioactivity on a Sephadex G-10 column.
`Rabbit anti-bleomycin antiserum, purchased from Guild-
`hay Antisera, University of Surrey, was used at a dilution of
`1 : 4,800. All dilutions of reagents were made in assay buffer:
`0.01 molll phosphate buffer pH 7.0, containing 0.15 molll NaCl
`and 0.1% gelatin.
`The radioimmunoassay was performed by incubating 50 pl
`bleomycin
`standards
`(3-20!) nglrnl) or
`samples,
`100
`ul"*5I-bleomycin, 100 pl antiserum, and 350 pl assay buffer on
`ice for 3 h. Dextran coated charcoal, 200 pl, was added to
`Separate free from bound bleomycin. After 10 min at 0° C the
`tubes were centrifuged and decanted before counting.
`Bleomycin dilutions in serum were run as Controls at three
`different levels. The interassay coefficient of variation was in
`the range 8—12%,
`and the lower
`limit of detection
`3 nglml.
`The serum concentrations were graphed over time on
`semilog paper. The half-lives were calculated according to a
`one-compartment model, which gave the best fit for the
`elimination phase. This model was applied together with the
`trapezoidal method in analysis of the area under the curve,
`clearenec, and distribution volume. Comparisons were per-
`formed using van der Waerclen’s X-test.
`
`Results
`
`The bleomycin serum levels were slightly increased after the
`second BOS injection, and with one exception on the 5th day
`of B08 treatment (Fig. 1). The peak serum concentrations
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1052 PAGE 1
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1052 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`‘275
`
`AUC yield associated with BOS indicate delayed or incom-
`plete systernic uptake from the injection site. A second phase
`of retarded elimination was not found during the 12h of
`recording in our study, but have been demonstrated by others
`[13]. However, the delayed peak concentration, the prolonged
`serum half—life, the maintained therapeutically active concen-
`tration, and the huge distribution volume account for some
`depot effect of
`the BOS preparation.
`In contrast,
`IM
`adn-unistration of bleomyein saline solution is reported with
`peak levels obtained after one hour [7], a mean half-life of
`2.6 h [7], and no detectable levels in serum after 24 h
`[10, 13}.
`We have not been able to make a direct comparison
`between IM injections of BOS and bleomycin saline solution,
`because a 4-h infusion was used as control. In our department
`this was previously believed to be the most convenient way of
`maintaining serum levels within the therapeutic range in a
`prolonged periode of time. BOS seems even more convenient,
`and it does not demand hospitalization. Neither of the two
`schedules was able to show beneficial effect in these patients,
`but BOS may represent an advantage in treatment of tumors
`more responsive to bleomycin.
`
`Acknowledgements. The authors are grcatful to Felicity Reeve at
`Guildhay Antisera, University of Surrey, for the prompt supply of free
`samples of antisera. The authors thank Villy Hansen at H. Lundbcck
`Ltd. for competent assistance with the mathematical calculations.
`
`References
`
`1. Abe F, Tsuhosaki M, Tanaka T, Katoh Y, Yoshioka 0 (1976)
`Studies of absorption, excretion, and organ distribution of
`bleomycin oil suspension. Jpn J Antibiot 29: 826
`2. Baker LH (1918) A bleomycin combination for disseminated
`cervical cancer. In: Carter SK, Crooke ST, Umezawa H (eds)
`Bleornycin: Current status and new developments. Academic
`Press, New York, p 173
`3. Broughton A, Strong J E (1976) Radioimrnunoassay of bleomycin.
`Cancer Res 36: 1418
`
`4. Broughton A, Strong IE, Holoye FY, Bedrossian CW (1977)
`Clinical pharmacology of bleomycin following intravenous infu-
`sion as determined by radioirnmunoassay. Cancer 40: 2772
`5. Cooper KR, Hong WK (1981) Prospective study of the pulmonary
`toxicity of continuously infused blcornycin. Cancer Treat Rep
`65:419
`
`6. Ginsberg SJ, Crooke ST, Bloomfield CD, Peterson B, Kennedy
`13], Bloom J, Ellison RR, Pajak TF, Gottlieb AJ (1982)
`Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and low—dose con-
`tinuous infusion bleomycin in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer
`49:1346
`
`7. Oken MM, Crooke ST, Elson MK, Strong IE, Shafer RB (1981)
`Pharmacokinetics of bleornycin after IM administration in man.
`Cancer Treat Rep 65: 485
`8. Paus E, Bormer O, Nustad K (1982) Radioiodination of proteins
`with the iodogen method.
`In:
`International Atomic Energy
`Agency (ed) Radioirnmunoassay and related procedures in
`medicine 1982. IAEA, Vienna. p 161
`9. Pong YM, Alherts os, Chen HS, Mason N, Moon TE (1930)
`Antitumour activity and plasma kinetics of bleornycin by contin-
`uous and intermittent admirustration. Br J Cancer 41: 644
`10. Prestayako AW, Croolre ST (1.978) Clinical pharmacology of
`blcomycin.
`In: Carter SK. Croolte ST, Umezawa H (eds)
`Bleomycin: Current satus and new developments. Academic
`Press, New York, p 11'?
`11. Sarnuels ML, Johnson DE, Holoye FY (1976) Bleornyciri
`combination chemotherapy programs in stage-3 testicular neopla-
`
`
`
`Bleornycinfngrfrnl)
`
`—— Patient J.N.
`
`—-— Patient U.H.
`
`
`
`1
`
`15
`
`10
`Time (hours)
`
`Fig. 1. The time course of bleomycin levels in serum from two patients
`on day] and 5 of therapy graphed on sernilog paper. Patient J. N.
`received 0.3 ml BOS IM twice daily
`Patient U. H. received
`bleomycin IV infusion 5 mg in saline solution for 4 h daily
`
`were obtained approximately 2 h after IM BOS injections. The
`infusion regimen revealed the higher peak levels, averaging
`138 ngfml vs 97 nglml in the BOS regimen (median 140 nglml vs
`90 ng/ml, respectively). The mean serum half-life was 3.5 h
`(median 3.7 h) with BOS and 2.411 (median 2.4 h) for the
`infusion (P < 0.01). Ten hours from the initiation of treatment
`on day 1 the BOS regimen revealed a mean serum level which
`was 20 nglml higher than found after the infusion. The
`corresponding difference on day 5 had increased to 31 ngfrnl.
`Before therapy on day S the serum levels achieved by BOS
`ranged from 10 ngiml to 18 ngfml compared to less than 3 ng/ml
`after infusion therapy.
`The mean distribution voiume ( VD) of bleomycin was 29.4
`um? (median 30.4 limz) with nos compared to 13.0 um?
`(median 13.1 lhnz) for the infusion (P < 0.001). The mean area
`under the serum concentration curve (AUC) obtained with
`B05 was not significantly higher than after the infusion
`regimen (57.0 mglminlml vs 49.0 mglmixuml respectively),
`despite that the BOS regimen contained almost the double
`dose of bleomycin. The mean serum clearence rate (Q) for
`B05 was 101 mlrminfmz (median 10? mlfminfmz) and 66
`mlfmin./mg (median 74 rnllminlmz) for the infusion.
`Clinically, B05 was well tolerated. Fever was seen, but
`this presented less problems than with the IV infusion. One
`patient developed a gluteal abcess, a side effect seen also in
`treatments with other depot preparations, and probably due to
`the oily vehicle. A 54-year-old woman developed a pulmonary
`fibrosis after six courses of therapy, totaling 18 ml BOS (270
`mg bleomycin) and 60 mg mitomycin-C. The symptoms were
`relieved with steroids. There were two patients with partial
`responses. Both had lung metastases, which were reduced in
`size. These effects were only short lived, such that they did not
`play a part in prolonging life.
`
`Discussion
`
`The twice daily BOS schedule revealed more favourable
`pharrnacokinetics than the 4-h infusion regimen. The lower
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1052 PAGE 2
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1052 PAGE 2
`
`

`
`276
`
`sia: Results in 101 patients. In: Carter SK, Ichikawa Tl’, Mathé G,
`Umezawa H (eds) Gama Monogr Cancer Res 19. University of
`Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1:269
`12. Sikic BI, Collins JM, Mimnaugh EG, Gram TE (1978) Improved
`therapeutic index of hleomycin when administered by continuous
`infusion in mice. Cancer Treat Rep 62: 2011
`
`13. Slevin M1,, Harvey VJ, Aherne GW, Burton NK, Johnston A,
`Wrigley PFM (1984) Delayed-release bleomycin. Comparative
`pharmacology of bleomycin oil suspension and bleornycin in
`saline. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 13: 19
`
`Received April 19, 1984fAcoepted October 31, 1984
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1052 PAGE 3
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1052 PAGE 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket