throbber
HYSICL
`HAMACY
`
`LP MARTIN
`
` MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`FOURTH EDITION
`
`Physical Pharmacy
`
`PHYSICAL CHEMICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
`
`Alfred Martin, Ph.D.
`Emeritus Coulter R. Sublett Professor
`Drug Dynamics Institute,
`College of Pharmacy,
`University of Texas
`
`with the participation of
`PILAR BUSTAMANTE, Ph.D.
`Titular Professor
`Department, of Pharmacy
`and Pharmaceutical Technology,
`University Alcala de Henares,
`Madrid, Spain
`
`and with illustrations by
`A. H. C. CHUN, Ph.D.
`Associate Research Fellow
`Pharmaceutical Products Division,
`Abbott Laboratories
`
`Q
`
`B. I. Waverly Pvt Ltd
`New Deihi
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 2
`
`

`
`B. I. Waverly Pvt Ltd
`54 Jsnputh. New Delhi - 110 001
`
`Reprint authorised by Waverly International
`
`Copyright 0 1993 Waverly International. 428 East Preston Street,
`Baltimore, Maryland 2102-3993 USA
`
`Indian Reprint 1994
`Reprint 1995
`
`All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyrighL No part of this book may
`be reproduced in any form or by any means, including photocopying or utilized by
`any infonnation storage and retrieval system without written permission from the
`copyright owner. Violators will be prosecuted.
`
`This edition is for sale in India, Bangladesh, Nepal. Bhutan and Maldives only:
`
`ISBN 81-7431-001-0
`
`Price Rs1495.m
`
`Published in India by 13.1. Waverly Pvt Ltd, 54 Janpath. New Delhi - I10 001 and
`printed at United lnfia Press. New Delhi.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 3
`
`

`
`2
`
`States of Matter
`
`Binding Forces Between Molecules
`States of Matter
`The Gaseous State
`
`Solids and the Crystalline State
`The Liquid Crystalline State
`Phase Equilibria and the Phase Rule
`Thermal Analysis
`The Liquid State
`
`
`BINDING FORCES BETWEEN MOLECULES
`
`In order for molecules to exist in aggregates in gases,
`liquids, and solids, intermolecular forces must exist. An
`understanding of intermolecular forces is important in
`the study ofpharmaceutical systems and follows logi-
`cally from the previous discussion of intramolecular
`bonding energies. Cohesion, or the attraction of like
`molecules, and adhesion, or/the attraction of unlike
`molecules, are manifestations of intermolecular forces.
`A knowledge of these forces is important
`for an
`understanding not only of the properties of gases,
`liquids, and solids, but also of interfacial phenomena,
`flocculation in suspensions, stabilization of emulsions,
`compaction of powders in capsules, and the compression
`of granules to form tablets.
`Repulsive and Attractive Forces. When molecules
`interact, both repulsive and attractive forces operate.
`As two molecules are brought close together,
`the
`opposite charges in the two molecules are closer
`together than the like charges and cause the molecules
`to attract one another. When the molecules are brought
`so close that
`the outer charge clouds touch,
`the
`molecules repel each other like rigid elastic bodies.
`_Thus attractive forces are necessary in order that
`molecules cohere; repulsive forces are necessary in
`order that the molecules do not interpenetrate and
`annihilate one another. Moelwyn-Hughes‘ points to the
`analogy between human behavior and molecular phe-
`nomenon. Just as the actions of humans are often
`
`so‘ molecular
`influenced by a conflict of loyalties,
`behavior is governed by attractive and repulsive forces.
`Repulsion is due to the interpenetration of the
`electronic clouds of molecules and increases exponen-
`tially with a decrease in distance between the mole-
`cules. At a certain equilibrium distance, about 3 or 4 X
`10‘3 cm (3 or 4 angstroms), the repulsive and attractive
`22
`
`forces are equal. At-this position, the potential energy
`of the two molecules is a minimum and the system is
`most stable (Fig. 2-1). This principle of minimum
`potential energy applies not only to molecules but to
`atoms and to large objects as well.
`Under the following headings are discussed the
`various types of attractive intermolecular forces.
`Van der Waals Forces. Dipolar molecules frequently
`tend to align themselves with their neighbors, so that
`the negative pole of one molecule points toward the
`positive pole of the next. Thus,
`large groups of
`molecules may be associated through weak attractions
`known as dipole—dipole or Keesom forces. Permanent
`dipoles are capable of inducing an electric dipole in
`nonpolar molecules (which are easily polarizable) in
`order to produce dipole—induced dipole, or Debye,
`interactions, and nonpolar molecules can induce polar-
`
`—Energy:>
`
`Fig. 2-1. Repulsive and attractive energies and net energy as a
`function of the distance between molecules. Note that a minimum
`occurs in the net energy because of the different character of the
`attraction and repulsion curves.
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 4
`
`

`
`5
`
`Solutions of Nonelectrolytes
`
`Concentration Expressions
`Equivalent Weights
`Solutions of Nonelectrolytes
`
`Ideal and Real Solutions
`
`Colligativé Properties
`Molecular Weight Determination
`
`Materials may be mixed together to form a true
`solution, a colloidal solution, or a coarse dispersion. A
`true solution is defined as amixture of two or more
`
`.
`
`components that form a homogeneous molecular disper-
`sion, in other words, a one-phase system, the composi-
`tion of which can vary over a wide range. The terms in
`this definition warrant further comment, and an at-
`tempt at clarification is made in the following para-
`graphs.
`A system is a bounded space or a definite quantity of
`substance that is under observation and experimenta-
`tion. Under some circumstances,
`the sytem may
`consist only of radiant energy or an electric field,
`containing no material substances. The term phase has
`already been defined in Chapter 2 as a distinct homo-
`geneous part of a system separated by definite bound-
`aries from other parts of the system. Each phase may
`be consolidated into a contiguous mass or region, such
`as a single piece of ice floating in water, or it may be
`distributed as small particles throughout the system,
`such as oil droplets in an emulsion or solid particles in a
`pharmaceutical suspension. .
`.
`These latter two are examples of coarse dispersions
`the diameter of the particles in emulsions and suspen-
`sions for the most part being larger than 0.1 pm (100 A
`or 10" cm). A colloidal dispersion represents a system’
`having a particle size intermediate between that of a
`true solution and a coarse dispersion, roughly 10 to 5000
`A. A colloidal dispersion may be considered as a
`two-phase system (heterogeneous) under certain cir-
`cumstances and as a one-phase system (homogeneous)
`under others. A colloidal dispersion of silver proteinate
`in water is heterogeneous since it consists of distinct
`particles constituting a separate phase. A colloidal
`dispersion of acacia or sodium carboxymethylcellulose
`in water, on the other hand, is homogeneous. It does
`not differ significantly from a solution of sucrose and
`
`may be considered as a single-phase system or true
`solution.‘
`_
`A solution composed of only two substances is known
`as a binary solution, and the components or constitu-
`ents are referred to as the solvent and the solute. We
`
`use the terms component and constituent interchange-
`ably here, as do other authors, to represent the pure
`chemical substances that make up a solution. The
`number of components has a definite significance in the
`"phase rule, as explained on p. 37. The constituent
`present in the greater amount in a binary solution is
`arbitrarily designated as the solvent and the constitu-
`ent in the lesser amount as the solute. When a solid is
`
`dissolved in a liquid, however, the liquid is usually
`taken as the solvent and the solid as the solute,
`irrespective of the relative amounts of the constituents.
`When water is one of the constituents of a liquid
`mixture, it is usually considered the solvent. When
`dealing with mixtures of liquids that are miscible in all
`proportions, such as alcohol and water,
`it
`is less
`meaningful to classify the constituents as solute and
`solvent.
`
`Properties of Solutions. The physical properties of
`substances may be classified as colligative, additive,
`and constitutive. Some of the constitutive and additive
`
`properties of molecules were considered in Chapter 4.
`In the field of thermodynamics, physical properties of
`systems are classified as extensive properties, depend-
`ing on the quantity of the matter in the system (e.g.,
`mass and volume) and intensive properties, which are
`independent of the amount of the substances in the
`system (e.g., temperature, ‘pressure, density, surface
`tension, and viscosity of a pure liquid).
`Colligative properties depend mainly on the number
`of particles in a solution. The colligative properties of
`solutions are osmotic pressure, vapor pressure lower-
`ing, freezing point depression, and boiling point eleva-
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 5
`
`

`
`102 Physical Pharmacy
`
`tion. The values of the colligative properties are
`approximately the same for equal concentrations of
`different nonelectrolytes in solution regardless of the
`species or chemical nature of’ the constituents.
`In
`considering the colligative properties of solid-in-liquid
`solutions, it is assumed that the solute is nonvolatile
`and that the pressure of the vapor above the solution is
`provided entirely by the solvent.
`Additive properties depend on the total contribution
`of the atoms in the molecules or on the sum of the
`
`properties of the constituents in a solution. An example
`of an additive property of a compound is the molecular
`weight, that is, the sum of the masses of the constituent
`atoms.
`
`The masses of the components of a solution are also
`additive, the total mass of the solution being the sum of
`the masses of the individual components.
`Constitutive properties depend on the arrangement
`and to a lesser extent on the number and kind of atoms
`
`within a molecule. These properties give clues to the
`constitution of individual compounds and groups of
`molecules in a system. Many physical properties may be
`pa.rtly additive and partly constitutive. The refraction
`of light, electric properties, surface and interfacial
`characteristics, and the solubilityof drugs areat least
`in part constitutive and in part additive properties;
`these are considered in other sections of the book.
`Types of Solutions. A solution may be classified
`according to the states in which the solute and solvent
`occur, and since three states of matter (gas, liquid, and
`crystalline solid) exist, nine types of homogeneous
`mixtures of solute and solvent are possible. These
`types, together with some examples, aregiven in Table
`5- 1.
`.
`
`When solids or liquids dissolve in a gas to form a
`gaseous solution, the molecules of the solute can be
`treated thermodynamically like a gas; similarly, when
`gases or solids dissolve in liquids, the gases and the
`solids can be considered to exist in the liquid state. In
`the formation of solid solutions, the atoms of the gas or
`liquid take up positions in the crystal lattice and behave
`like atoms or molecules of solids.
`
`The solutes (whether gases, liquids, or solids) are
`divided into two main classes: nonelectrolytes and
`electrolytes. Nonelectrolytes are substances that do not
`yield ions when dissolved in water and therefore do not
`
`TABLE 5- 1. min of solutions
`
`Solute
`
`Gas
`Liquid
`Solid
`Gas
`Liquid
`Solid
`Gas
`Liquid
`Solid
`
`Solvent
`
`Example
`
`Gas
`Gas
`Gas
`Liquid
`Liquid
`Liquid
`Solid
`Solid
`Solid
`
`Air
`Water in oxygen
`Iodine vapor in air
`Carbonated water
`Alcohol in water
`Aqueous sodium chloride solution
`Hydrogen in palladium
`Mineral oil in paraffin
`Go|d—si|ver mixture, mixture of alums
`
`conduct an electric current through the solution. Ex-
`amples of nonelectrolytes are sucrose, glycerin, naph-
`thalene, and urea. The colligative properties of solu-
`tions of nonelectrolytes are fairly regular. A 0.1-molar
`solution of a nonelectrolyte produces approximately the
`same colligative effect as any other nonelectrolytic
`solution of equal concentration. Electrolytes are sub-
`stances that form ions in solution, conduct the electric
`current, and show apparent “anomalous” colligative
`properties, that is, they produce a considerably greater
`freezing point depression and boiling point elevation
`than do nonelectrolytes of the same concentration.
`Examples of electrolytes are hydrochloric acid, sodium
`sulfate, ephedrine, and phenobarbital.
`Electrolytes may be subdivided further into strong
`electrolytes and weak electrolytes depending on
`whether the substance is completely or only partly
`ionized in water. Hydrochloric acid and sodium sulfate
`are strong electrolytes, whereas ephedrine and phe-
`nobarbital are weak electrolytes. The classification of
`electrolytes according to Arrhenius and the discussion
`of the modern theories of electrolytes are found in
`Chapter 6.
`
`CONCENTRATION EXPRESSIONS
`
`The concentration of a solution may be expressed
`either in terms of the quantity of solute in a definite
`volume of solution or as the quantity of solute in a
`definite mass of solvent or solution. The various
`expressions are summarized in Table 5-2.
`Molarity and Normality.’ Molarity and normality are
`the expressions commonly used in analytical. work. All
`solutions of the same molarity contain the same number
`of solute molecules in a definite volume of. solution.
`When a solution contains more than one solute, it may
`have different molar concentrations with respect to the
`various solutes. For example, a solution can be 0.001
`molar (0.001 M) with respect to phenobarbital and 0.1
`M with respect to sodium chloride. One liter of such a
`solution is prepared by adding 0.001 mole of phenobar-
`bital (0.001 mole X 232.32 g/mole = 0.2323 g) and 0.1
`mole of sodium chloride (0.1 mole X 58.45 g/mole =
`5.845 g) to enough water to make 1000 mL of solution.
`Difficulties are sometimes encountered when one
`
`desires to express the molarity of an ion or radical in a
`solution.-A molar solution of sodium chloride is 1 M with
`respect to both the sodium and the chloride ion,
`whereas a molar solution of Na2CO3 is 1 M with respect
`to the carbonate ion and 2 M with respect to the sodium
`ion, since each mole of this salt contains 2 moles of
`sodium ions. A molar solution of sodium chloride is.also
`1 normal (1 N) with respect to bothits ions; however, a
`molar solution of sodium carbonate is 2 N with respect
`to both the sodium and the carbonate ion.
`
`Molar and normal solutions are popular in chemistry
`since they may be brought to a convenient volume; a
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 6
`
`

`
`TABLE 5-2.
`
`concentmtion Expressions
`
`Expression
`
`Symbol Definition
`
`Chapter 5 - Solutions ofNmwlectrolytes
`
`103
`
`Molarity
`Normality
`Molality
`Mole fraction
`
`Mole percent
`
`Moles (gram molecular weights) of solute in 1 liter of solution
`Gram equivalent weights of solute in 1 liter of solution
`Mo|es of solute in 1000 g of solvent
`Ratio of the moles of one constituent (e.g.. the solute) of a solution
`to the total moles of all constituents (solute and solvent)
`Moles of one constituent in 100 moles of the solution. Mole percent
`is obtained by multiplying mole fraction by 100.
`% w/w Grams of solute in 100 g of solution
`Percent by weight
`% v/v Milliliters of solute in 100 mL of solution
`Percent by volume
`Percent weight-in-volume %*w/v Grams of solute in 100 mL of solution
`Milligram percent
`—
`Milligrams of solute in 100 mL of solution
`
`M, c
`N
`m
`X, N
`
`. 4.
`
`,
`
`volume aliquot of the solution, representing a known
`weight of solute, is easily obtained. by the use of the
`burette or pipette.
`Both molarity and normality have the disadvantage
`of changing value with temperature because of the
`expansion or contraction of liquids, and should not be
`used when one wishes to study the properties of
`solutions at various temperatures. Another difficulty
`arises in the use of- molar and normal solutions for the
`
`study of properties such as vapor pressure and osmotic
`pressure, which are related to the concentration of the
`solvent. The volume of the solvent in a molar or a
`
`normal solution is not usually known, and it varies for
`different solutions of the same concentration, depend-
`ing upon the soluteand solvent involved.
`Molality. A molal solution is prepared in terms of
`weight units and does not have the disadvantages just
`discussed; therefore, molal concentration appears more
`frequently than molarity and normality in theoretic
`studies. It is possible to convert molality into molarity
`or normality if the final volume of the solution is
`observed or if the density is determined. In aqueous
`solutions more dilute than 0.1 M, it usually may be
`assumed for practical purposes that molality and mo-
`larity are equivalent. For example, a 1% solution by
`weight of sodium chloride with a specific gravity of
`- 1.0053 is 0.170 M and 0.173 molal (0.173 m). The
`following difference between molar and molal solutions
`should also be noted. If another solute, containing
`neither sodium nor chloride ions, is added to a certain
`volume of a molal solution of sodium chloride,
`the
`solution remains 1 m in sodium chloride, although the
`total volume and the weight of the solution increase.
`Molarity, of course, decreases when another solute is
`added because of the increase in volume of the solution.
`
`Molal solutions are prepared by adding the proper
`weight of solvent to the carefully weighed quantity of
`the solute. The volume of the solvent can be calculated
`
`from the specific gravity, and the solvent may then be
`measured from a burette rather than weighed.
`Mole Fraction. Mole ,f1-action is used frequently in
`experimentation involving theoretical considerations
`since it gives a measure of the relative proportion
`
`of moles of each constituent
`
`in a solution.
`
`It
`
`is
`
`expressed as
`
`7&1
`X1- M + M
`77/2
`X2 - nl + "2
`
`(5-1)
`
`(5-2)
`
`for a system of two contituents.
`X1 is the mole fraction of constituent 1 (the subscript
`1 is ordinarily used as the designation for the solvent),
`X2 is the mole fraction of constituent 2 (usuallythe
`solute), and n, and re, are the number ofmoles of the
`constituents in the solution. The sum of the mole
`
`fractions of solute and solvent must equal unity. Mole
`fraction is also expressed in percentage terms’ by
`multiplying X1 or X2 by 100. In a solution containing
`0.01 mole of solute and 0.04 mole of solvent, the mole
`fraction of the solute X2 = 0.01/(0.04 + 0.01) = 0.20.
`Since the mole fractions of the two constituents must
`
`equal 1, the mole fraction of the solvent is 0.8. The mole
`percent of the solute is 20%; the mole percent of the
`solvent is 80%.
`The manner in which mole fraction is defined allows
`one to express the relationship between the number of
`solute and solvent molecules in a simple, direct way. In
`the example just given, it is readily seen that two out of
`every 10 molecules in the solution are solute molecules,
`and _it will be observed later that many of the properties
`of solutes and solvents are directly related to theirimole
`fraction inthe solution. For example, the partial vapor
`pressure above asolution brought°about by the pres-
`ence of a volatile solute is equal to the vapor pressure of
`the pure solute multiplied by the mole fraction of the
`solute in the solution.
`
`The percentage method of
`Percent Expressions.
`expressing the concentration of pharmaceutical’ solu-
`tions is quite common. Percent _by weight signifies the
`number of grams of solute per 100 grams of solution. A
`10% by weight (% w/w) aqueous solution of glycerin
`contains 10 got’ glycerin dissolved in enough water (90
`g) to make 100 g of solution. Percent by volume is
`expressed as the volume of solute in milliliters con-
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 7
`
`

`
`TABLE 5-3.
`
`conversion Equations for concentration Terms
`
`A. Molality (moles of solute/kg of_ solvent, m) and mole fraction of
`solute (X2).
`“
`
`X =
`
`2
`
`m
`
`+ EM?‘-Q
`
`1000 X2
`m = M1(1 — X2)
`

`
`_ 1000 (1 — x1)
`_T
`B. Molarity (moles of solute/liter of solution, c) and mole fraction of
`solute (X2).
`
`Xz=
`
`C
`
`1000p — cM2
`c + ———j
`M1
`
`C
`
`1000 pX2
`_
`' M1(1 — x2) + Mgxg
`
`C. Molality (m) and molarity (c).
`
`,,, = _1fl’£_
`1000p - M2 C
`
`C =
`
`10009
`1000
`—— + M;
`m
`
`D’. Molality (m) and molarity (c) in terms of weight of solute, wz,
`weight of solvent, w,, and molecular weight. M2, of solute.
`W2/M2
`1000 wz
`
`= w,/1ooo = w1M2
`1000 pwg
`= rnzm, + w)
`
`m C
`
`Definition of terms:
`p = density of the solution (3/cm’)
`M1 = molecular weight of the solvent
`M2 = molecular weight of the solute
`X1 = mole fraction of the solvent
`X2 = mole fraction of the solute
`w; = weight of the solvent (3. mg, kg, etc.)
`we = weight of the solute (g, mg, kg. etc.)
`
`Example 5-1 are useful to determine whether your
`derived equation is correct.
`
`EQUIVALENT WEIGHTS’
`
`A gram atom of hydrogen weighs 1.008 g and consists
`of 6.02 X 10” atoms (Avogadro's number) of hydrogen.
`This gram atomic weight of hydrogen combines with
`6.02 X 1023 atoms of-fluorine and with half of 6. 02 X 1023
`atoms of oxygen. One gram atom of fluorine weighs 19
`g and one gram atom of oxygen weighs 16 g. Therefore,
`1.008 g of hydrogen combines with 19 grams of fluorine
`and with half of 16 or 8 grams of oxygen. The quantities
`of fluorine and oxygen combining with 1.008 g of
`hydrogen are referred to as the equivalent weight of
`the combining atoms. One equivalent (Eq) of fluorine
`(19 g) combines with 1.008 g of hydrogen. One equiva-
`
`l04 Physical Pharmacy
`
`tained in 100 mL of the solution. Alcohol (USP) contains
`92.3% by weight and 94.9% by volume of CZHEOH at
`15.56°, that is, it contains 92.3 g of C2H5OH in 100 g of
`solution or 94.9 mL of C2H50H in 100 mL of solution.
`calculations Involving concentration Expressions. The
`calculations involving the various concentration expres-
`‘ sions are illustrated in the following example.
`
`ExampIe'5— I. An aqueous solution of exsiccated ferrous sulfate was
`prepared by adding 41.50 g of FeSO_, to enough water to make 1000
`mL of solution at 18° C. The density of the solution is 1.0375, and the
`molecular weight of FeSO., is 151.9. Calculate (a) the molarity; (b) the
`molality; (c) the mole fraction of FeS0., the mole fraction of water,
`and the mole percent of the two constituents; and (cl) the percent by
`weight of FeS0,.
`(a) Molarity
`
`Moles of FeSO4 =
`
`g of FeS04
`molecular weight
`
`41.50 _
`" 151.9 ' 02732
`
`_
`M°"*"‘y '
`(b) Molality
`
`moles of FeS04
`
`0,2732 _
`- 1 liter * “-2732 M
`
`Grams of solution = volume X density;
`1000 X 1.0375 = 1037.5 g
`Grams of solvent = grams of solution — grams
`ofFeS0., = 1037.5 — 41.5 =_ 996.0 g
`
`0,2732
`moles of FeSO4
`_
`M°"1“" ‘ kgof solvent ‘ 0.990 ' 02743 "‘
`(c) Mole fraction and mole percent
`996
`
`=
`
`Moles of water =
`Mole fraction of FeSO,,
`moles of FeSO4
`02732
`X‘ ' moles + moles ' 55.27 + 0.2732 ' M049
`water
`FeS04
`
`moles
`
`Mole fraction of water,
`
`55.27
`X‘ ' 55.27-+ 0.2732 E 0'99“
`Notice that X, + X, = 0.9951 + 0.0049 = 1.0000
`Mole percent of FeS04 = 0.0049 x 100 = 0.49%
`Mole percent of water = 0.9951 X 100 = 99.51%
`(41) Percent by weight
`Percent by weight of FeS0.
`
`_ g of F‘eS04
`_ g of solution X 100
`
`= lgfi x 100 = 4.00%
`
`One may use the table of conversion equations, Table
`5-3, to convert concentration expressions, say molal-
`ity, into its value in molarity or mole fraction. Or,
`knowing the weight w, of a solvent, the weight wz of the
`solute, and the molecular weight M2 of the solute, one
`can calculate the molarity c or the molality m of the
`solution. As an exercise, the reader should derive an
`expression relating X1 to X2 to the weights w, and w2
`and the solute’s molecular weight M2. The data in
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 8
`
`

`
`1O
`
`Solubility and Distribution Phenomena
`
`General Principles
`So|vent—So|ute Interactions
`
`Solubility of Gases in Liquids
`Solubility of Liquids in Liquids
`
`Solubility of Nonionic Solids in Liquids
`Distribution of Solutes Between immiscible
`Solvents
`
`The topic of solutions was introduced in Chapter 5.
`We must now look at solutions in a more quantitative
`manner so as to understand the theory and applications
`of the phenomenon of solubility. Such knowledge is
`important to the pharmacist, for it permits him to
`choose the best solvent medium for a drug or combina-
`tion of drugs, helps in overcoming certain difficulties
`that arise in the preparation of pharmaceutical solu-
`tions, and, furthermore, can serve as a standard or test
`of purity. A detailed study of solubility and related
`properties also yields information about the structure
`and intermolecular forces of drugs.
`The solubility of a compound depends upon the
`physical and chemical properties of the solute and the
`solvent, as well as upon such factors as temperature,
`pressure, the pH of the solution, and, to a lesser extent,
`the state of subdivision of the solute.
`
`Of the nine possible types of mixtures, based on the
`three states of matter (p. 102), only gases in liquids,
`liquids in liquids, and solids in liquids are of particular
`pharmaceutical importance and will be considered in
`this chapter.
`
`GENERAL PRINCIPLES
`
`Definitions. A saturated solution is one in which the
`
`solute is in equilibrium with the solid phase (solute).
`Solubility is "defined in quantitative terms as the
`concentration of solute in a saturated solution at a
`
`certain temperature, and in a qualitative way, it may be
`defined as the spontaneous interaction of two or more
`substances to form a homogeneous molecular disper-
`sion.
`
`An unsaturated or subsaturated solution is one
`
`containing the dissolved solute in a concentration below
`
`212
`
`that necessary for complete saturation at a definite
`temperature.
`A supersaturated solution is one that contains more
`of the dissolved solute than it would normally contain at
`a definite temperature, were the undissolved solute
`present. Some salts such as sodium thiosulfate and
`sodium acetate can be dissolved in large amounts at an
`elevated temperature and, upon cooling, fail to crystal-
`lize from the solution. Such supersaturated solutions
`can be converted to stable saturated solutions by
`seeding the solution with a crystal of solute,‘ by
`vigorous agitation, or by scratching the walls of the
`container. Supersaturation presumably occurs when
`the small nuclei of the solute required for the initiation
`of crystal formation are more soluble than larger
`crystals, making it difficult for the nuclei to form and
`grow with resultant failure of crystallization.
`The Phase Rule. Solubility may be described in a
`concise manner by use of Gibbs’ phase rule, which was
`described on page 37.
`
`F=C—P+2
`
`(10-1)
`
`in which F is the number of degrees offreedom, that is,
`the number of independent variables (usually tempera-
`ture, pressure, and concentration) that must be fixed to
`completely determine the system, C is the smallest
`number of components that are adequate to describe
`the chemical composition of each phase, and P is the
`number of phases. The application'of the phase rule to
`the miscibility of liquids is described on pages 40, 41 and
`the application to solutions of solids in liquids is given
`on p. 41.
`Solubility Expressions. The solubility of a drug may be
`expressed in a number of ways. The U. S. Pharmacopeia
`and National Formulary list the solubility of drugs as
`the number of milliliters of solvent in which 1 gram of
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 9
`
`

`
`TABLE 10-1.
`
`Terms of Approximate Solubility
`
`Term
`
`Very soluble
`Freely soluble
`Soluble
`sparingly soluble
`Slightly soluble
`Very slightly soluble
`Practically insoluble, or insoluble
`
`‘
`
`Parts of Solvent Required
`for 1 Part of Solute
`
`Less than 1 part
`1 to 10 parts
`10 to 30 parts
`30 to 100 parts
`100 to 1000 parts
`1000 to 10,000 parts
`More than 10,000 parts
`
`solute will dissolve. For example, the solubility of boric
`acid is given in the U.S. Pharrnacopeia as follows: 1 g of
`boric acid dissolves in 18 mL of water, in 18 mL of
`alcohol, and in 4 mL of glycerin. Solubility is also
`quantitatively expressed in terms of molality, molarity,
`and percentage (p. 103).
`For substances whose solubilities are not definitely
`known,
`the values are described in pharmaceutical
`compendia by the use of certain general terms, as given
`in Table 10-1. Solubilities of drugs are found expressed
`in various units in the Merck Index. For exact solubil-
`ities of many substances, the reader is referred to the
`works of Seidell, Landolt—Bornstein, International
`Critical Tables, Lange’s Handbook of Chemistry, and
`the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Tech-
`niques suitable for accurately determining the solubili-
`ties of solid compounds in liquids and the mutual
`solubilities of two liquids have been described by Mader
`and Grady.‘
`
`SOLVENT—SOLUTE INTERACTIONS
`
`The reader should review pages 22 to 24 in Chap-
`ter 2 on intermolecular forces before continuing with
`this section. The pharmacist knows that water. is a
`good solvent for salts, sugars, and similar compounds,
`whereas mineral oil and benzene are often solvents for
`
`substances that are normally only slightly soluble in
`water. These empiric findings are summarized in the
`statement: “like dissolves like.” Such a maxim is
`
`satisfying to most of us, but the occasional inquisitive
`student may be troubled by this vague idea of “like-
`ness.” If he sets out to learn in what manner the solute
`
`and solvent are alike, he will find himself in a fascinat-
`ing area of scientific investigation that is still in an
`unsettled state. The advanced student who is inter-
`
`ested in this subject may Wish to consult the books by
`Hildebrand and Scott,’ Leussingf’ and Dack.‘
`Polar Solvents. The solubility of a drug is due in large
`measure to the pola.rity of the solvent, that is, to its
`dipole moment. Polar solvents dissolve ionic solutes and
`other polar substances. Accordingly, water mixes in all
`proportions with alcohol and dissolves sugars and other
`polyhydroxy compounds.
`
`Chapter 10 - Solubility and Distribution Phenomena 213
`
`Hildebrand has shown, however, that a consideration
`of dipole moments alone is not adequate to explain the
`solubility of polar substances in water. The ability of
`the solute to form hydrogen bonds is a far more
`influential factor than is the polarity as reflected in a
`high dipole moment. Although nitrobenzene has a
`dipole moment of 4.2 X 10"“ esu cm and phenol a value
`of only 1.7 X 10‘13 esu cm, nitrobenzene is soluble only
`to the extent of 0.0155 mole/kg in water, while phenol is
`soluble to the extent of 0.95 mole/kg at 20° C.
`Water dissolves phenols, alcohols, aldehydes, ke-
`tones, airlines, and other oxygen- and nitrogen-contain-
`ing compounds that can form hydrogen bonds with
`water.
`
`If
`R_0. .
`
`‘F
`. .H_0. .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Alcohol
`
`ll
`R—C:O. .
`
`ll
`. .H—0. .
`
`. .'
`
`Aldehyde
`
`Amine
`
`A difference in acidic and basic character of the
`
`constituents in the Lewis electron donor—acceptor
`sense also contributes to specific interactions in solu-
`tions.
`
`The molecules of water in ice are joined together by
`hydrogen bonds to yield a tetrahedral structure. Al-
`though some of the hydrogen bonds are broken when
`ice melts, water still retains its ice-like structure in
`large measure at ordinary temperatures. This quasi-
`crystalline structure is broken down when water is
`mixed with another substance that is capable of hydro-
`gen bonding. When ethyl alcohol and water are mixed,
`the hydrogen bonds between the water molecules are
`replaced partly by hydrogen bonds between water and
`alcohol molecules.
`
`In addition to the factors already enumerated, the
`solubility of a substance also depends on structural
`features such as the ratio of the polar to nonpolar
`groups of the molecule. As the length of a nonpolar
`chain of an aliphatic alcohol increases, the solubility of
`the compound in water decreases. Straight-chain mono-
`hydroxy alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, and acids with
`more than four or five carbons cannot enter into the
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1042 PAGE 10
`
`

`
`214 Physical Pharmacy
`
`hydrogen-bonded structure of water and hence are only
`slightly soluble. When additional polar- groups are
`present in the molecule, as found in propylene glycol,.
`glycerin, and tartaric acid, water solubility increases
`greatly. Branching of the carbon chain reduces the
`nonpolar effect and leads to increased water solubility.
`Tertiary butyl alcohol is miscible in all proportions with
`water, whereas n-butyl alcohol dissolves to the extent
`of about 8 g/100 mL of water at 20° C.
`In brief, polar solvents such as water act as solvents
`according to the following mechanisms.‘
`(a) Owing to their high dielectric constant, namely
`about 80 for water, polar solvents reduce the force of
`attraction between oppositely charged ions in crystals
`such as sodium chloride (p. 30). Chloroform has a
`dielectric constant of 5 and benzene one of about 2;
`hence,
`ionic compounds are practically insoluble in
`these solvents.
`
`(b) Polar solvents break covalent bonds of potentially
`strong electrolytes by acid—base reactions since these
`solvents are amphiprotic (p. 143). For example, water
`brings about the ionization of HCl as follows:
`
`HCl +

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket