throbber
V01. 10 ~ 1988 Pharmaceurtsch Weekblad Scientific Edition
`
`I85
`
`review articles
`
`Plasma or serum in therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology
`
`DONALD R.A. UGES
`
`Introduction
`
`In therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxi-
`cology most determinations of the concentration of a
`substance are carried out in blood or blood com-
`
`ponents. Whole blood can only be analysed if the
`blood has been sampled in collecting tubes con-
`taining an anticoagulant. When such samples are
`centrifuged, plasma is obtained. Therefore. plasma
`always contains one or more anticoagulants. Hep-
`arin sodium (3-100 Ulml) is most widely used for this
`purpose, but citrate, edetate, oxalate and fluoride
`are also suitable additives. Serum is the clear liquid
`that separates from blood when blood is allowed to
`clot completely and then centrifuged. Therefore
`serum contains no fibrogen and no anticoagulants.
`The choice between whole blood on the one hand
`
`and either plasma or serum on the other is clear.
`Whole blood concentrations are only measured if the
`compound is concentrated in the erythrocytes (e.g.
`lead, cyanide, mercury, carbon monoxide. chlor-
`thalidone),"3 if there is a fluctuating erythrocyte-
`plasma ratio (ciclosporin A),“ or because of the risk
`of loss during storage or centrifugation.‘
`The clinical effect of several compounds correlates
`better with the concentration in a tissue compart-
`ment than with the serum or plasma concentration.
`Considering erythrocytes as a readily available tis-
`sue, whole blood should be the matrix of choice in
`therapeutic drug monitoring ' and toxicology.”
`Sometimes lymphocyte concentration can predict
`the therapeutic effect better (epirubicin, mitox-
`antrone). 9 In nearly all other cases, plasma or
`serum concentrations are measured.
`
`Is there any difference between serum and plasma
`concentration?
`
`The expression ‘plasma concentration’ is a part of
`the title of many articles in the literature. Reading
`these articles, however,
`it appears that serum
`samples have often been taken. The authors very
`seldom present
`their arguments for
`the choice
`between plasma or serum.
`Some of the advantages of plasma over serum
`are:
`
`— large volume;
`— no delayed clotting;
`— less risk of haemolysis;
`— the sample is often suitable for both whole blood
`and plasma monitoring.
`Some of the disadvantages of plasma over serum
`are:
`
`— the (unknown) influence of the anticoagulant on
`the assay, the protein binding and the stability of
`the sample;
`— the (unknown) influence of additives or impurities
`in the anticoagulant on the assay and the concen-
`tration;
`— the risk ofthe formation of small clots (incomplete
`mixing, instability);
`— dilution of the sample;
`— sampling is more expensive;
`— choice of anticoagulant can be confusing.
`
`ADVANTAGES OF PLASMA OVER SERUM
`
`Larger available volume
`If blood is allowed to clot and is then centrifuged,
`
`formation of small clots and dilution of the sample.
`
`Keywords
`Anticoagulants
`Blood coagulation
`Blood preservation
`Plasma
`
`Protein binding
`Serum
`
`Therapeutic drug monitoring
`Toxicology
`
`‘Laboratory for Clinical and
`Forensic Toxicology and Drug
`Monitoring, Department of
`Pharmacy, University Hospital
`Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001,
`9700 RB Groningen.
`
`Uges DRA. Plasma or serum in therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical
`toxicology. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] I988;I0:185-8.
`
`Abstract
`
`The relative merits of plasma and serum in blood analysis are reviewed.
`The expression ‘plasma concentration’ is often used in the literature,
`although serum samples have been taken. In most cases serum and plasma
`concentrations of analytes are the same. The choice depends mostly on
`the policy of the hospital or the availability of the test tubes in the ward.
`Some of the advantages of plasma over serum are large volume, no
`delayed clotting, less risk of haemolysts. In addition, the sample 15 often
`suitable for both whole blood and plasma monitoring. Some of the
`disadvantages of plasma over serum are the (unknown) influence of the
`anticoagulant on the assay, on the protein binding and on the stability of
`the sample, the (unknown) influence of additives or impurities in the
`anticoagulants on the assay and on the concentration, the risk of the
`
`_
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 1
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`186
`
`Vol. 10 - 1988 Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition
`
`about 30 to 50% of the original volume is collected as
`serum (upper layer). A slightly larger sample (in
`general 50%), known as plasma, can be obtained by
`centrifugation of a blood sample collected in a tube
`containing an anticoagulant. Serum and plasma are
`not significantly different with respect
`to drug
`analysis.
`that serum is devoid of the
`Despite the fact
`proteins associated with the clotting process, the
`most important proteins (quantitatively speaking),
`such as the albumins and globulins, are present in
`similar amounts (approximately 2% wtlvol) in both
`serum and plasma. Thus plasma is in general pre-
`ferred_ because of its greater yield from blood
`samples. The greater yield the greater the amount of
`drug and the fewer the problems with sensitivity, or
`with sampling neonates.” "
`
`Delay through time needed for clotting
`Clotting can sometimes be of long duration. This is
`especially true when samples are taken in polypro-
`pylene test tubes, in which case clotting can continue
`even after centrifugation.
`
`Decreased risk of haemolysis
`The chlorthalidone concentration in erythrocytes
`is about 40 times as high as that in plasma.“ One
`percent of haemolysis (which cannot easily be seen)
`will increase the apparent plasma concentration by
`25%. This problem is even more acute when serum
`samples are produced from whole blood.
`The separation by centrifugation should be carried
`out as quickly-as possible in order to prevent any
`effects due to lysis of the blood clot. " This phenom-
`enon is well known in the analysis of the endogenous
`compounds potassium and iron in serum.
`
`Suitability of the sample for both whole blood and
`plasma analysis
`If several analyses have to be carried out on the
`blood of a single patient, determinations can be
`carried out in whole blood as well as plasma from one
`blood sample containing a suitable anticoagulant. In
`bedside chemistry whole blood is preferred to
`plasma or serum, because this avoids a centri-
`fugation step.”
`
`DISADVANTAGES or PLASMA
`
`IN RELATION
`
`ro SERUM
`
`The influence of the anticoagulant on the assay
`Walters and Roberts showed that heparin at a
`concentration of 100 U per ml interfered with the
`gentamicin EMIT3 assay, but not with the TD?
`FPIA assay.” This effect is thought to be due to the
`inhibition of enzyme activity rather than disturbance
`of the antigen-antibody reaction. Blood collected
`into heparinized tubes usually contains approxi-
`mately 30 U of heparin per ml and at this level no
`interference with the EMIT® assay occurs. How-
`
`ever, plasma derived from specimens collected from
`arterial and venous blood is likely to yield erroneous
`results.
`
`The formation of a gentamicin—heparin complex
`has been demonstrated by Myers etal. “ Cipolle et al.
`concluded that heparinized tubes should not be used
`when collecting blood samples for assays where
`inactivation of gentamicin would give false values.”
`Edetate was for gentamicin a suitable alternative.
`On the other hand, the Dutch foundation ‘Quality
`control
`clinical drug analysis
`and toxicology‘
`(KKGT) found with its quality control programme
`that edetate interfered strongly with the FPIA assay
`and not with the EMIT‘@ assay of carbamazepine and
`with the E.MI'I® assay and not with FPIA assay of
`valproic acid. The reason of this interference is
`unknown (Dijkhuis IC, personal communication,
`1988).
`
`The influence of the anticoagulant on protein
`binding
`A discrepancy in the measurement of lidocaine in
`heparinized blood and in serum could be expected,
`as heparin increases the free fraction of lidocaine.”
`Lidocaine is subsequently redistributed from the
`plasma into red blood cells.
`The percentage of free ibuprofen in heparinized
`plasma is significantly higher than in non-heparin-
`ized plasma. 7 Although small doses of heparin can
`affect drug binding, the extent and variability of the
`effect depends on the biological activity of the
`heparin, and varies with the manufacturer and
`batch, time of sampling, and food intake . 18 Although
`the intravenous administration of heparin results in a
`high lipolytic activity in vivo and consequently
`increases the concentrations of non-esterified fatty
`acids in vitro, it is unlikely that this will happen after
`adding heparin to the tube.
`Non-esterified fatty acid can displace numerous
`drugs from their binding sites in plasma. When the
`non-esterified fatty acids concentration increases in
`vltro. phenytoin will be displaced from the binding
`sites. The free phenytoin then shifts from the plasma
`into the erythrocytes, resulting in a lower phenytoin
`plasma/level (up to 20% below its original value!).'9
`The same phenomenon was found with amitrip-
`tyline, imipramine and maprotiline.5 The recovery
`of chlorproniazine added to heparinized plasma in
`vitro was reduced compared with that obtained with
`water or oxalated plasma."
`
`The influence of the anticoagulant on the stability
`of the sample
`When heparin deteriorates or adsorbs onto the
`wall of the collecting tube, clotting will still occur in a
`clear plasma sample. The pH of the sample can be
`changed by using sodium citrate, or oxalate as
`anticoagulant. This change of pH may influence the
`stability of the drug in the sample (e.g. atracurium).
`Sodium fluoride can be used as anticoagulant (cal-
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 2
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 2
`
`
`
`

`
`187
`Vol. 10 - 1988 Pharmaceutisch Weekbiad Scientific Edition
`
`cium binder), and as a preservative (antimicrobial)
`of ethanol. Blood samples that are to be tested for
`ethanol must contain 10 mg sodium fluoride per ml
`during storage.” 22
`
`The influence of additives or impurities" in the
`anticoaguiant on the assay
`Benzyl alcohol, which may be added to heparin as
`a preservative, can disturb the fluorimetric assay of
`corticosteroids.” Serum zinc concentrations are 16%
`higher than plasma concentrations. This phenom-
`enon was explained by a release of zinc from
`platelets during coagulation of the blood samples.“
`Keyzer et at. , however, found no difference between
`the serum and plasma zinc levels of fifty volun-
`teers.”
`
`The influence of additives or impurities in the
`anticoaguiant on the concentration
`Anticoagulants can contain impurities which are
`precisely the compounds to be determined, e.g. lead,
`aluminium, copper, fluoride.
`
`The risk of clot formation because of poor mixing
`or poor stability
`Unfortunately, blood samples in heparinized
`tubes are sometimes not very well mixed. In such
`cases a partially clotted sample will arrive in the
`laboratory.
`
`Improper dilution of the sample
`We have had a number of incidents in which blood
`
`samples of about 5 ml were diluted with about 1 ml of
`a solution of anticoagulant (20% dilutionl). Differ-
`ences in serum and plasma transcobalamin II levels in
`the literature have been explained by dilution by
`EDTA or sodium fluoride solutions.’
`
`Cost
`
`Sample tubes with heparin are approximately 10%
`more expensive than non-heparinized tubes.
`
`The choice of anticoagulant
`There are several anticoagulants, each of which
`must be used in a different concentration. Examples
`are sodium heparin,
`lithium heparin, potassium
`edetate, sodium edetate, sodium citrate, and sodium
`fluoride. The differences in the influence of these
`
`anticoagulants on the various assays are largerly
`unknown.
`Differences were demonstrated between serum
`
`and plasma levels of endogenous compounds, which
`may be of sufficient magnitude to alter clinical
`interpretation of some results when using different
`radioassay procedures and different anticoagu-
`lants.37 These differences are in general larger with
`immunoassays than with chromatographic methods.
`Cholinesterase activity can be determined in serum
`or heparinized plasma. Sodium fluoride and citrate
`should not be used as anticoagulants because they
`
`depress cholinesterase activity as measured by sev-
`eral methods.”
`
`Anticoagulants used in sampling plasma can con-
`found diffusion assays by causing alterations in the
`agar gel matrix. Therefore, in the microbiological
`measurement of, for example, erythromycin, cytara-
`bine or 5-fluorouracil the use of serum is recommen-
`ded.“
`
`Conclusion
`
`In conclusion, we can say that in most cases serum
`and plasma analyte concentrations are the same. The
`choice depends mostly on the established practice in
`the hospital or the kind of available test tubes in the
`ward. In special cases such as the determination of
`free drug levels, however,
`there are important
`differences. It is advisable, therefore, that during
`kinetic studies of drugs, the similarity of serum and
`plasma levels for the compound being studied be
`proven. Furthermore, to avoid confusion, authors
`should be careful and precise in their presentations
`so that readers are aware that blood, plasma or
`serum is the sample under discussion.
`
`References
`
`' Casarett Ll, Doull J. Toxicology. The basic science of
`poisons. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company,
`1975-
`‘ Moffat AC, ed. Clarke's isolation and identification of
`drugs. 2nd ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press,
`1986.
`" Beenrlann B, Groschinsky-Grind M. Clinical pharmaco-
`kinetics of diuretics. Clin Pharmacokinet r98o;5:22r-45.
`‘Keown PA, Stiller CR, Stawecki M, McMichael J,
`J-Iowson W. Pharmacokinetics and interactions of ciclo-
`sporin. In: Schindler R. ed. Ciclosporin in autoimmune
`diseases. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 198539-42.
`5 Uges DRA, Van der Paauw HJW. Alcohol, de bloed—
`proef en de contra—expertise [Alcohol, blood test and
`counterexpertise]. Ned Forens Tijdschr 1982;2:7-9.
`" Maguire KP, Burrows GD, Norman JR, Scoggings BA.
`Blood plasma distribution ratios of psychotropic drugs.
`Clin Chem 1980;216:1624-5.
`1 Linnoila M, Dorrity F, Jobson K. Plasma and erythro-
`cyte levels of tricyclic antidepressants in depressed
`patients. Am J Psychiatry1978;135:557-61.
`" De Vries EGE, Greidanus J, Mulder NH, et al. A phase
`Ipharmacoltinetic study with 21-day continuous infusion
`of epirubicin. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1445-51.
`" De Vries EGE, Greidanusl, Mulder NH, et al. A phase
`1 and pharmacokinetic study with 21-day continuous
`infusion of mitoxantrone (MK). Am Soc Clin Oncol
`1988;7:58.
`'° Smits RV, Stewart .lT. Textbook of biopharmaceutic
`analysis. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1g8r:3-I6.
`" Toseland PA. Samples and sampling. In: Moffat AC,
`ed. Clarke's isolation and identification of drugs. 2nd
`ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 19862111-7.
`'2 I-lichs JA,
`Iosefsohn M. Another physician’s office
`analyser:
`the Abbott vision evaluated. Clin Chem
`1987;33:817-9-
`" Walters MI, Roberts WH. Gentamicinfheparin inter-
`actions: effects on two immunoassays and on protein
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 3
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 3
`
`
`
`

`
`188
`
`Vol. to - I988 Pharmaceutisch Weekbiad Scientific Edition
`
`binding. Ther Drug Monitor 1984;6:t99~2o2.
`“‘ Meyers DR, DeFehr J, Bennett WM, Porter GA, Olsen
`GD. Gentamicin binding to serum and plasma proteins.
`Clin Pharn-1acolTher t978;23:356—6o.
`'5 Cipolle RJ, Zaske DE, Crossley K. Gentamicinftobra-
`mycin. Therapeutic use and serum concentration moni-
`toring. In: Taylor WJ, Finn LA, eds. Individualizing
`drug therapy. 1. New York: Frank Cross Townsend Inc. ,
`1931138.
`“ Dube LM, Ho-Ngoc A, Davies RF, Beaulands DS,
`Mousseau N, McGilveray IJ . Influence of protamine on
`lieparine induced increases of lidocaine free fraction.
`Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 1983;42:401-
`15.
`” Pearce GA, Brown KF. Heat inhibition of in vitro
`lipolysis and "C ibuprofen protein binding in plasma
`from heparinized uraemic subjects. Life Sci 1983;
`33:1457—66.
`'3-Naranjo CA, Sellers EM, Khouw V, Alexander P, Fan
`T, Shaw I. Variability in heparin effect on serum drug
`binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980;223:545-5o.
`"Schulz P, Abang A, Giacomini JC, Blaschke TF,
`Giacomini KM. Effect of heparin on the red blood
`cell-to-plasma concentration ratio of diphenylhydantoin
`and prazosin. Ther Drug Monitor 1983;5:497-9.
`‘° Whelpton R. Tricyclic antidepressants and neuroleptics.
`In: Curry AS, ed. Antalytical methods in human
`toxicology. Part I. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie, 1985:
`139-58-
`" Flanagan R], Widdop B. Clinical toxicology. In: Curry
`AS, ed. Analytical methods in human toxicology. Part I.
`Weinheirn: Verlag Chemie, 19:85:37-66.
`
`1’ Froentjes W, Schute JB, Strengers Th, Venvey AMA.
`Analytisch—chemische aspecten van de wijziging van de
`Wegenverkeerswet (11) [Analytical and clinical aspects
`of the change in the Traffic Act 01)]. Phartn Weekbl
`1976;111:349-62.
`33 Werk EE jr. Interference of heparin containing benzyl
`alcohol
`in the fluorometric determination of plasma
`corticosteroids. J Clin Endocrinol 1967;27:I35o.
`" Foley B, Johnson SA, Hackley B, Smith JC jr, Halsted
`JA. Zinc content of human platelets. Proc Soc Exp Biol
`Med 1968;128:265-9.
`3’ Keyzer JJ, Oosting E, Wolthers BG, Muskiet FAJ,
`Hindi-iks FR, Van der SlikW. Zincin plasma and serum:
`influence of contamination due to the collection tubes.
`
`Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 198332248-51.
`2“ Carmel R. Vitamin B12-binding proteins in serum and
`plasma in various disorders. Efiects of anticoagulants.
`Am J Pathol 1978;69:3I9-25.
`1'’ Kubasik'NP, Sine HE. Results for serum and plasma
`compared in
`15
`selected radioassays. Clin Chem
`1973:2413 137-9-
`” Huizinga JR, Gips CI-I. Evaluation of the UV-34o
`spectrophotometric determination for pseudocholin-
`esterase activity (EC 3.1.1.8) in human serum. J Clin
`Chem Clin Biochem 1987;25:I61-5.
`2" S:-nits RV, Stewart JT. Microbiologic assay methods. In:
`Textbook of biopharmaceutic analysis. Philadelphia:
`Lea & Febiger, 19811249-59.
`
`Received December 1987.
`Revised April 1988.
`Accepted May 1988.
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 4
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket