throbber
ICI 182,780 antagonizes the effects of estradiol on
`estrous behavior and energy balance in Syrian hamsters
`
`GEQRGE N. WADE, J. BRADLEY POWERS;
`JEFFREY I). BLAUSTEIN, AND DEBORAH E. GREEN
`Bepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience and Behuwbr Program,
`University of Maamchusetts, Amherst. llrfassashusettr 0100!?
`
`Wade, George N., J. Bradley Powers, Jeffrey D.
`Blaustein. and Deborah E. Green. I01 182,780 antagonizea
`the effects of estradiol on estrous behavior and energy balance
`in Syrian harnabors. Am. J. Physiol. 265 {Regulatory Integrative
`Comp. Physioi. 34): R1399-R1403, 1993.~—Three experiments
`examined the effects of ICI 182,780, a steroidal “pure” armies‘
`trogen that is thought to be active peripherally but not in the
`brain when given systemically, on energy balance, ealrowz be-
`havior, and in viva cell nuclear Binding of [3H}estradiol in Syr-
`ian hamsters. Pretreatment with ICE 182,3?-0 reduced in viva
`uptake of [31~l}estz*adiol in uterus but not in pooled hypothala-
`mua—preoptic area. Gvarieotumized Syrian hantsters. were
`treated with estradiol ban:-aoate (E33, 5 ;xg,"d£!.y}, }CI 182,780 (250
`ug/day}. or both EB and R31 132,780 for 4 wk. Eatradiol treat-
`ment caused significant decreases in food intake, body weight
`and fat content, and linear growth. Given alone, IC1 182,780
`had no effect on these measures. When they were given concur-
`rently, ICI 132,’? 80'a1;tenuated the effects of estradiol on body
`weight, growth, and fat content but not on food intake. ‘Treat-
`ment with ICI 182,’/80 significantly diminished estrous behav-
`ior induced with either EB plus progesterone or with EB alone.
`These findings support the hypothesis that, in addition to its
`actions in the brain, ea:-slradiol acts peripherally to modulate
`estrous behavior and energy balance.
`body; weight; body composition; uterus; food intake; estrogen
`receptors
`
`affect other social behaviors (21), but the possibility of
`peripheral sites of action has not been tested“ Second, it
`has been Quggested that es-tradiol can act peripherally to
`alter lipid metabolism and energy balance in hamsters
`(3), but theevidence for this notion is rather indirect.
`Third, hamsters and rats differ in some of their re-
`sponses to antiestrogens. The older nonsteroidal amiss-
`trogens such as MER-25, (31-1328, and tamoxifen inhibit
`5teroi<i—induced estrous behavior in both species (13, 14,
`17, 25). However, for regulation of energy balance these
`compounds are full estrogen agonists in rats, whereas
`they act as antagonists in hamsters (24, 25}. Thus the
`newer, steroidal antiestrogens such as ICI1S2,7BO may
`have different effects, in rats and hamsters.
`
`METH ODS
`
`A rrimals and Housing
`Adult, female Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus aumtus; initial
`body wt 90-110 3) of the Lal<:LVG strain were obtained from
`Charles River Breeding Laboratorizrs (Wilmington, MA). Ham-
`sters were housed in wit.-e—bottom stainless steel cages (1725 X
`17.5 X 25 cm) and given tap water and Purina Laboratory
`Rodent Chow (no. 5001} ad lihitum. Food pellets. were placed on
`the cage floor. A 14:18-ll light-dark cycle was maintained (lights
`on at 6700 h}, and room temparalure was kept at 22 i 2" C. After
`1 wk of acclimation to the laboratory, animals were ovariecto
`mizzexzi via bilateral flank incisions under pentobaxbital sodium
`anesthesia [S-G mgfkg; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO).
`
`Procedures
`
`rr IS CLEAR THAT omnrm steroids can act directly in
`the brain to affect a wide variety of behaviors and physi-
`ological functions, including social behaviors, regulatory
`behavicsrs, and energy balance (2, 4, 21. 23. 26). For
`example, appropriately placed intracerebral implants of
`estradiel facilitate estrous behavior, decrease food in-
`In viva biriding of Pfflestradioi. Three weeks after ovarian-
`take, or stimulate voluntary exercise in ovariectomized
`tomy, hamsters were given. three daiily injections of sesame oil
`(n == 6) or 250 pg ICI 182.7813 (n = 63. One hour after the third
`rats (6, 18, 27); lesions of these neural loci prevent; the
`injection, animals were injected intraperitoneally with 61] ,uCi
`respective behavioral changes in response to systemic
`["‘H]estradiol (sp act 103 Ci/mmnl, New England Nuclear, Bos-
`estradiol treatment (7, 9, 12).
`ton. MA). One hour after injection of [*‘H}e3M-adiol, hamsters
`In addition to these central actions, several lines of
`were anesthetized with pentoharbital sodium (50 mg); a blood
`evidence support the hypothesis that estradiul can act
`sample was taken via cardiac puncture with a heparinized sy-
`on nonneura] peripheral tissues to affect behaviors and
`ringe and then centrifuged. Hamsters were then perfused with
`energy balance in rats (22, 23, 26). The fact: that the
`cold saline (0.15 M}. The hypothalamuss-preoptic area and
`antiastrogen ICI 182330 attenuates the effects of estra~
`uterus were rapidly dissected. Tissues were homogenized, and a
`diol on energy balance and estrous behavior in mariac-
`cell nuclear fraction was purified by a modification {8} of the
`tcmtiized rats is consistent with the existence of periph-
`method of Zigmond and Mclilwen (30). Radioactivity was ex—
`treated from the purified cell nuclei with 3 >4 é ml toluene—based
`eral sites of action (22). ICI 182,780 differs from other
`xintillation fluid. A 1013121 aliquot of plasma was transferred to
`antiestrogexxs in that it is highly potent peripherally but
`a scintillation vial containing 12 ml of scimillation fluid and
`it does not appear to be active in the brain when it is
`shalom vigorously. Radioactivity was counted at an efficiency of
`administered systaemically (22, 28, 29).
`~-15%, and counts were corrected for quelrchizxg hy autamntir:
`The idea that eat:-adiol acts both centrally and periph~
`external standardimtion. Protein in cell nuclear samples was
`erally to affect bahaviors and energy balance has not
`precipitated with ethanol, dissolved in 0.3 N K011, and esti-
`been explored in species other than rats. The present
`mated 1:351 the method of Bradford (5). Tieame cell nuclear con-
`experiments use ICI 182,780 to investigate this possibil-
`centrations of radioactivity are expressed as tissue to plasma
`ity in Syrian hamsters, Hamsters are of interest for
`ratios (Lel, disintegrationa per minute per milligram tissue pro-
`several ‘reasons. First, it is known that est:-adiol can act
`tein divided by disintegratiorxa per minute per microliter blood
`directly in the brain to facilitate sexual receptivity and
`plasma).
`0363-6119,-‘Q3 $2.00 Copyright © L993 the American Physiological Society
`
`R1399
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 1
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. V. Astrazeneca AB IPR2016-01316
`
`

`
`R1400
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`Uterus
`
`Brain
`
`*
`
`8
`6
`
`4
`
`2
`
`400
`
`CI
`E
`3 300
`
`E g
`
`3g
`
`! 200
`
`l00
`
`ICI
`Oil
`10
`Oil
`Fig. 1. Effects of ICI 182,780 (ICI) on in vivo uptake of [3H]eatradiol by
`cell nuclei in uterus and hypothalamus-preoptic area in ovariectomized
`hamsters. Animals were treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml) or D3!
`(250 pg) 48, 24, and 1 h before injection of [3H]estradio1_ Data are
`expressed as tissue to plasma ratios, that is, disintegrations per minute
`per milligram cell nuclear protein divided by disintegrations per minute
`per microliter plasma. * P <1 0.05 vs C-il—treated group.
`
`_:
`
`-
`
`“CH
`
`EB.‘-[Cl
`
`Food intake (g/day)
`
`A
`nl
`
`li:"93.‘\‘*-e
`‘A . P,
`
`L
`
`5 4
`
`Body weight change (9)
`
`20
`
` 0
`
`W
`
`7
`
`23
`
`21
`14
`Days of freolmem
`Fig. 2. Body weight gain and food intake of ovsriectoiniaed hamsters
`treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml), estradiol lienzoate (E13, 5 pg/
`day}, ICI (250 pg/day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. (Initial mean group body
`weights 13-1.2—135.9 g.)
`
`Energy balance. Three weeks after ovariectomy, baseline food
`intake (pouching and spillage accounted for) and body weight
`were measured to the nearest 0.1 g. After 1 wk of data collection,
`animals were divided into four groups matched for baseline food
`intake and body weight. The groups were given daily subcuta-
`neous injections of 0.1 ml sesame oil vehicle containing 2.5%
`ethanol (n = 11), 5 pg estradiol berizoate (EB, n = 10), 250 pg
`ICI 182,780 (11. = 11), or 5 pg EB plus 250 pg ICI 182,780 in =
`10) for 4 wk. Body weight and food intake were measured twice
`a week. On the first and last. days of injections, hamsters were
`anesthetized with pentobarhital sodium (80 mg/kg body wt),
`and naso-anal length was measured to the nearest millimeter
`with calipers while the anirnais were stretched with a constant
`100-5; weight (24). The difference between the two lengths is an
`index of linear growth during hormone treatment.
`At the end of the experiment all animals were killed with an
`overdose of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg). Parametrial and ret-
`roperitoneal fat pads and uteri were removed and weighed. Evia-
`cerated carcasses were dried to a constant weight at 70° C, and
`carcass lipid was estimated from Carcass water content. In ham-
`sters, percent carcass water and percent carcass lipid are highly
`correlated (r = 0.98: ‘Kilipid = -1.32 X ‘léwater + 96.54; n = 289;
`Wade, unpublished data). Fat-free dry weight was calculated as
`the total eviscerated carcass weight less water and estimated
`lipid content.
`Estrous behavior. The animals that were treated with EB,
`ICI 182,780, or EB plus ICI 182,780 (above) were tested for
`estrous behavior twice, once with and once Without progeste-
`rone treatment. On the 3rd day of estrogen and/or antiestrogen
`treatment, all animals were given a subcutaneous injection of
`200 pg progesterone in 0.1 ml sesame oil at 09130 h and tested for
`estrous behavior 5 to 6 h later. The second test, without pro-
`gesterone, took place on the 23rd day of estrogen and/or anti-
`estrogen treatment. For both tests, females were adapted to a
`small Plexiglas arena (30 X 36 X 30 cm) for 5 min. Sexual
`receptivity tests were begun by introducing a sexually active
`male to the arena. In addition, the female‘s flanks and perigeni—
`tal region were continuously stimulated using an eyelid brush.
`Tests lasted for 180 s; the latency to display lordosis and the
`total time that the lordosis posture was maintained were re-
`corded. Tests were conducted 6-8 h after lights-on.
`
`Data Analyses
`
`Data were analyzed by t tests and by one- or two -way analyses
`of variance followed by Newman~Keuls post hoc tests where
`appropriate. Differences were considered statistically signifi~
`cant when P < 0.05 for two tails. Data are expressed as means
`t SE.
`
`RESULTS
`
`In Viuo Binding of [3H]Estradz'ol
`Pretreatment with ICI 182,780 significantly reduced in
`vivo cell nuclear binding of [3H]estradiol in uterus but
`not in pooled hypothalamus-preoptic area (Fig. 1), simi-
`lar to findings with rats (22). However, uterine [3H]—
`estradiol binding was reduced by only ~50% in hamsters
`compared with ~90% in rats (22).
`
`Energy Balance
`EB treatment significantly reduced food intake and
`body weight gain (Fig. 2). ICI 182,780, given alone, had
`no effect on body weight, but it significantly attenuated
`the weight—reducing actions of EB. Given alone or in
`combination with EB, ICI 182,780 had no effect on food
`intake (Fig. 2).
`
`Treatment with EB caused significant reductions in
`carcass water and lipid but not in fat—free dry weight (Fig.
`3). Once again, ICI 182,780 alone had no effect, but it
`antagonized the effects of EB on carcass lipid content.
`The changes in body fat content were reflected in the
`weights of individual fat pads (Fig. 4). EB also caused a
`significant decrease in linear growth (change in nasoanal
`length) that was prevented by concurrent treatment with
`ICI 182,780 (Fig. 4). Aclrninistratinn of ICI 182,780 alone
`did not affect growth.
`EB treatment caused a significant increase in uterine
`weight. As in other species (22, 28, 29), 1C1 182.780 had
`no uterotrophic effect, and at this dose, the hntiestrogen
`partially antagonized the effect of EB on uterine weight
`(Fig. 4).
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 2
`
`

`
`24 c
`
`Oil
`
`Oil
`
`EB
`
`EB |Cl EB?!-
`ICI EE+
`EB ICI EB+
`IC‘.
`ICI
`ICI
`Fig. 3. Terminal carcass composition of ovariectomized hamsters
`treated with sesame oil vehicle [(1.1 ml), EB [5 pig/clay}, ICI (250 ug/
`day), or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. Bars with different letters are signifi-
`cantly different (P -21 0.05).
`
`ca rcass water lg)
`
`Carcass lipid lg)
`
`Fat-free dry wt. lg)
`
`Purametriol WAT lgl
`
`R9lg0P3|'"- WAT 191
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`R1401
`

`
`b
`
`l8
`
`1?
`ti
`
`
`
`Oil
`
`EB
`
`ICI
`
`EE-+
`1::
`
`on
`
`EB
`
`lC| EM
`non
`
`Oil
`
`Estrous Behavior
`
`Treatment with ICI 182,780, given alone or in combi-
`nation with progesterone, did not induce any signs of
`sexual receptivity in ovariectomized hamsters (data not
`shown}. However, ICI 182,780 did inhibit estrous behav-
`ior induced by treatment with either EB plus progeste-
`rone or EB alone.
`ICT 182.780 significantly increased
`lordosis latency and decreased lordosis duration in ham-
`sters treated with EB for 2 days followed by progesterone
`(Fig. 5. top). In hamsters given EB for 23 days. concur-
`rent
`treatment with ICI 182,780
`significantly de-
`creased lordosis duration but did not affect latency (Fig.
`5, bottom).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`These findings confirm a number of the unusual prop-
`erties of ICI 182,780. As in other species (22, 28, 29),
`ICI182,78O appears to be a pure antiestrogen in Syrian
`hamsters. It at least partially antagonized the actions of
`estradiol‘ on body weight, body composition,
`linear
`growth, estrous behavior, and uterine weight without
`having any agonistic (estrogenic) effects when given by
`itself to ovariectomized animals. The present results also
`support the conjecture that ICI 182.780 does not act di—
`rectly in the brain. As in rats (22), pretreatment with
`redioinert ICI 182,780, significantly reduced in vivo cell
`nuclear binding of [31-Ilestradiol in uterus but not in
`pooled hypothalamus-preoptic area. Taken together,
`these two findings suggest that ICI 182,780 can he used as
`an experimental tool to dissociate central and peripheral
`actions of eetradiol.
`The fact that ICI 182,780 attenuated the effects of as-
`tradiol treatment on body weight and fat content is con-
`sistent with our assertion (23, 26) that ovarian steroids
`act both centrally and peripherally to affect energy bal~
`ance. Several lines of work support the idea of distinct
`central and peripheral sites of estrogen action on energy
`balance in rats (22, 23, 26), but this appears to be the first
`evidence for this possibility in hamsters.
`The fact that treatment with ICI 182,780 completely
`blocked the effects of eetradiol on linear growth (change
`in naso-anal length) may indicate that estrogen effects on
`growth are predominantly due to nonneural actions of the
`steroid in harnsters. On the other hand, treatment with
`ICI 182,780 did not attenuate the suppressive effects of
`estradiol on food intake in hamsters. Thus it is likely that
`estradiol action in the brain is sufficient to decrease food
`
`Growth lmrnl
`
`(1
`
`O
`
`G
`
`b
`
`8
`o
`
`4
`2
`
`.500
`.375
`
`.230
`.125
`
`"on re
`
`Uterus (91
`b
`
`
`
`on
`
`to 1:: 53+
`lcl as?
`lCl
`ICI
`Fig. 4. Terminal weights of parametrial and retroperitoneal White adi~
`pose tissue (WAT) and uterus and change in naso—anal length (growth)
`of ovariectoinizecf hamsters treated with sesame oil vehicle (0.1 ml), EB
`(5 pg/day], ICI (250 pg/day}, or EB plus ICI for 4 wk. Ears with differ-
`ent letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
`
`Estrodiol-rprogesferone:
`1
`Latency (sec)
`Duration (sec)
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20,
`
`"‘
`
`120
`
`80
`
`40
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`ICI
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`ICI
`
`Esfradiol alone:
`
`Latency (sec)
`
`Duration (sec)
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`It
`
`120
`
`80
`
`40
`
`EB
`
`EB
`
`EB+
`EB+e
`ICI
`ICI
`Fig. 5. Effects of ICI on estrous behavior in ovarieetomized hamsters.
`Top: animals were injected with EB [5 gig) or EB plus ICI (250 fig} for
`2 days followed by 200 fig progesterone on 3rd day, 4-5 h before testing.
`Bottom: animals were injected with EB or EB plus ICI for23 days before
`testing. * P -< 0.05 vs. EB-treated group.
`
`intake and that no peripheral actions are required. How-
`ever, we cannot exclude the possibility that a higher dose
`of ‘ICI 182,780 than that used in this study would be
`sufficient to antagonize the effects of estradiol on food
`intake in hamsters.
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 3
`
`

`
`R1402
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN I-IAMSTERS
`
`These findings in hamsters contrast with those in rats
`where ICI 182,780 treatment actually potentiated the es-
`tradiol-induced decreases in food intake (22). We sug-
`gested that in rats this action of ICI 182,780 could be due
`to the induction of a “pharmacological hysterectomy,”
`because surgical hysterectomy enhances behavioral re-
`sponsiveness to estradiol in this species (1, 20). In con-
`trast, surgical hysterectomy does not potentiate estradiol-
`induced sexual receptivity in hamsters (19),
`just as
`ICI182,780 treatment does not potentiate the estradiol-
`induced decrease in food intake. Therefore, the difference
`between rats and hamsters in the effects of ICI 182,780
`on food intake may be a reflection of the species differ-
`ence in the actions of the uterus on behavioral respon-
`siveness to estradiol.
`
`ICI 182,780 attenuated the induction of estrous behav-
`ior, either by sequential treatments with estradiol and
`progesterone or by prolonged (23 days} treatment with
`estradiol alone. Thus, in hamsters, as in rats (2 2), estra-
`diol appears to act peripherally, as well as centrally’(2, 4,
`21), to facilitate estrous behavior. We have suggested
`that in rats, ICI 182,780 could attenuate sexual receptiv-
`ity at least in part by blocking the effects of estradiol
`on peripheral sensory fields that are important for es-
`trous responsiveness (10, 11). Similar work examining
`the effects of ovarian steroids on peripheral sensory
`fields has not yet been done in hamsters, but it is known
`that somatosensory cues
`from the perineal
`region
`play a significant role -in hamster copulatory behavior
`(15, 16}.
`are possible,
`comparisons
`that
`extent
`To
`the
`ICI 182,780 may be more effective at inhibiting estrous
`behavior in hamsters than in rats (22). If this is in fact
`the case, the uterus might play a role in this species dif-
`ference, because surgical hysterectomy potentiates the
`effects of estradiol on sexual receptivity in rats but not
`in hamsters (1, 19). Thus in rats ICI 182,780 could con-
`currently inhibit estrous behavior
`(perhaps by inhi-
`biting an action of estradiol on peripheral sensory
`fields) and facilitate estrous behavior (via a pharmaco-
`logical hysterectomy facilitating estrogen action in
`thebrain). According to this hypothesis, only the inhibi-
`tory actions would be evident in hamsters.
`It appears as though the dose of ICI 182,780 we have
`used (250 Jug/day) is more effective in reducing uterine
`weight and in vivo cell nuclear uptake of {3H]estradiol in
`rats than in hamsters (22). At this time it is not clear
`whether this effect is due to 1) species differences in
`ICI182,780 absorption, delivery, or clearance; 2) dif-
`ferences in affinity for estrogen receptors; or 3) some
`other factor(s). Differences in the EB doses that were
`used (2 gig in rats, 5 ng in hamsters) could explain the
`differences in the inhibition of uterine weight but can-
`not account for the differences in inhibition of [3H]es-
`tradiol binding. Whatever the basis for this species dif-
`ference in ICI 182,780 potency in the uterus, the impor-
`tant point remains that
`in both rats and hamsters
`treatment with ICI 182,780 attenuates the effects of es-
`tradiol on energy balance and on estrous behavior with-
`out interfering with neural estrogen binding. Therefore,
`these results support the hypothesis that estradiol affects
`
`energy balance and estrous behavior via both neural and
`nonneural sites of action.
`
`We are grateful to Jay Alexander, Robin Lempicki, and Joanne Tur-
`cotte for their expert technical assistance and to Alan E. Wakeling of
`Zeneca (ICI) Pharmaceuticals for the gift of ICI 182,780.
`This work was supported by Research Grants NS-10873. DK-32976.
`and NS-19327, by Research Scientist Award MH-00321, and by Re-
`search Scientist Development Award MH—00885 from the National In-
`stitutes of Health.
`Address reprint requests to G. N. Vifade, Dept. of Psychology, Univ.
`of Massachusetts, Amherst. MA 01003.
`Received 8 March 1993; accepted in final form 5 May 1993.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Ahdieh, H. B., and G. N. Wade. Effects of ‘hysterectomy on
`sexual receptivity, food intake, running wheel activity, and hypo-
`thalamic estrogen and progestin receptors in rats. J. Comp.
`Physioi. Psychol 96: 886-892, 1982.
`2. Barfield, R. J., B. S. Rubin, J. H. Glaser, and P. G. Davis.
`Sites of action of ovarian hormones in the regulation of oestrous
`responsiveness in rats. In: Hormones and Behaviour in Higher
`Vertebrates. edited by J. Balthazart. E. Prove. and R. Gilles. Ber-
`lin: Springer-Verlag, 1983, p. 2-17.
`3. Bhatia, A. J ., and G. N. Wade. Effects of pregnancy and ovar-
`ian steroids on fatty acid synthesis and uptake in Syrian hamsters.
`Am. J. Physiol. 260 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 29}:
`R153-R158, 1991.
`4. Blaustein, J. B., and D. H. Olster. Gunadal steroid hormone
`receptors and social behaviors. In: Advances in Comparative and
`Environmental Physiology, edited by J. Balthazart. Berlin:
`Springer-Verlag, 1989, vol. 3, p. 31-104.
`5. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for quantifica-
`lzionof micrograrn quantities of protein utilizing the principle of
`protein—dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248-254, 19376.
`6. Butera, P. 0., and R. J. Beikirch. Central
`implants of
`diluted estradioi: independent effects on ingestive and reproduc-
`tive behaviors of ovariectomized rats. Brain Res. 491: 268-273,
`1989.
`
`7. Butera, P. C., D. M. Willard, and S. A. Raymond. Effects of
`I-‘VN lesions on the responsiveness of female rats to estradiol.
`Brain Res. 516: 304-310. 1982.
`8. Gentry, R. T.. G. N. ‘Wade. and E. J. ROY. Individual differ-
`ences in estracliol-induced behaviors and in neural “H-estradiol
`uptake in rats. Physiol. Behcu. 17: 195-200, 1976.
`9. Kennedy, G. C. I-Iypothalamic control of the endocrine and be-
`havioural changes associated with oestrus in the rat. J. Physiol.
`Land. 172: 383-392. 1964.
`10. Komisaruk, B. R., N. T. Adler, and J. Hutchinson. Genital
`sensory field: enlargement by estrogen treatment in female rats.
`Science Wash. DC 178: 12954298, 1972.
`11. Kow, L.~M., and D. W. Pfaff. Effects of estrogen treat-
`ment on the size of receptive field and response threshold of
`pudenclal nerve in the female rat. Neuroendocrinulugy 13: 299-313,
`1973.
`12. Law, ’I'., and W. Meagher. Hypothalamic lesions and sexual
`behavior in the female rat. Science Wash. DC 128: 1626-1627,
`1953.
`13. Meisel, R. L., G. P. Dohanich, B. S. McEWen, and D. W.
`Pfaff. Antagonism of sexual behavior in female rats by ventra-
`lnedial hypothalamic implants of antieotmgen. Neu.roendocrin.o1-
`ogy 45: 20l—207, 1987.
`14. Morin, L. P.. J. B. Powers. and M. White. Effects of the
`antiestrogens, MER-25 and 131-628, on rat and hamster lurdoais.
`Harm. Behcw. T: 233-291, 1976.
`15. Noble, R. G. The sexual responses of the female hamster; a
`descriptive analysis. Ph.y5'ioL Bolton. 23: 1001-1004, 1979.
`16. Noble, R. G. Sex responses of the female hamster: effects on male
`performance. Phys-iol. Eehau. 24: 237-242, 1980.
`17. Roy, E. J., and G. N. Wade. Binding of [-’5H]estradioi by brain
`cell nuclei and female rat sexual behavior: inhibition by antiestro
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 4
`
`

`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`gens. Brain Res. 126: 73-87, 1977.
`Rubin, B. S_., and R. J. Barfield. Priming of estrous respon-
`siveness by implants of 1’Ifii—estradiol in the ventromedial hypo-
`thalamic nucleus of rats. Endocrinology 106: 504~509, 1980.
`Siegel, H. 1-, P. Cohen, and J. S. Rosenblatt. The effect of
`liystenectomy on hormone-induced lordosis behavior in hamsters.
`Physiol. Behuu. 23: 851i8-53, 1979.
`Siegel, H. I.. and J. S. Rosenblatt. Estrogen-induced maternal
`behaviors in ovariectumiaed-hyatarectumized virgin rats. Physiul.
`Behao. 11: 273—2'78, 1978.
`regulation of sociosexual be»
`.Taknhashi, L. K. Hormonal
`havinr in female mammals. Neurasci. Biobehciv. Rev. 14: 403-413,
`1990.
`Wade, G. l\'.. J. D. Blaustein, J. M. Gray, and J. M.
`Meredith. ICI 182,’:'80: a pure antiestrogen that affects behaviors
`and energy balance in rats without acting in the brain. Am. J.
`Physiol 265 (flegulalfory lntegmhue Comp. Phymhl. 34): EH9}!-
`R1398, 1993.
`Wade, G. N., and J. M. Gray. Gonadal effects on food intake
`and adiposity: a metabolic hypothesis. Physiol. Behau. 22: 583-
`593, 1979.
`Wade, G. N., and H. W. Heller. Tamoxifen mimics the effects
`
`ANTIESTROGEN EFFECTS IN HAMSTERS
`
`R1403
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`of estradiol on food intake, body weight, and body composition in
`rats. Am. J. Phyarlol. 264 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Phyaiol.
`33): R1219—Rl223, 1993.
`25. Wade, G. N., and J. B. Powers. Tamoxifen antagonizes the
`effects of estradiol on energy balance and estrous behavior in
`Syrian hamsters. Am. J. Pfiysiot. 265 (Regulatory Integrative
`Comp. Physiol. 34); R559—R552, 1993.
`Watie, G. N., and J. E. Schneider. Metabolic fuels and repm~
`duction in female mamma1s.Neuro.5*ci. Biobehav. Rev. 16: 235 272,
`1992.
`Wade, G. N., and I. Zucker. Modulation of food intake and
`locomotor activity in female rats by diencephalic hormone im-
`plants. J. Cump. Physfal. PS3/chul.
`'72: 328-336, 1970.
`Wakeling, A. E., and J. Bowler. ICI-182,780, a new antima-
`trogen with clinical potential. J. Steroid Biachem. Mol. Biol. 43:
`173-177, 1992.
`Wakeling, A. E., M. Dukes, and J. Bowler. A potent specific
`pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res. 51: 3867-
`3873, 1991.
`. Zigmond, R. E.., and B. S. McEwen. Selective retention of
`oestradiol by ceil nuclei in specific brain regions of the ovariecto—
`mized rat. J. Neurochem. 17: 8B9—899, 1970.
`
`28.
`
`'29.
`
`
`
`Astrazeneca Ex. 2109 p. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket