`Patent and Trademark Office
`Address:
`COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
`Washington, D.C. 20231
`
`APPLICATION NO‘
`
`'
`
`FILING DATE
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`_
`
`FIRST NAMED 1N\/ENTOR ’
`
`'
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`U8/9!3IZI,.l347
`
`‘I37/24/'5‘?
`
`YEN‘
`
`1 T
`
`r-
`
`~
`
`‘-1
`
`B2M1./D2'2-51
`
`WQLLACE
`
`DAVID J. SIMONELLI
`EILIEIS MEI-SLYNN
`2075 WEST BIB BEQVER, SUITEGIZIIJ
`TROY MI 48034-3443
`’
`
`V DATE MAILED:
`
`02/24/93 .
`
`Please "find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this appllcatlon or
`proceedlng.
`-
`.
`’
`
`Commlssloner of Patents and Trademarks
`
`PTO-9OC(FlEV.2/95)
`
`'
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`-
`
`'
`
`'
`
`I
`
`'
`
`'v-FI|aC0W-
`
`
`
`INTEL 1110
`
`
`
`
`
`Application No.
`08/900.047
`
`Applicantlsl
`
`Yen
`
`
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`D Acknowledgement is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d).
`D All Ci Some*
`i:lNone
`of the CERTIFIED copies of the priority documents have been
`:i received.
`
`Examiner
`Valencia Martin Wallace
`
`Group Art Unit
`2503
`
`1
`‘
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`fl Responsive to communicationlsl filed on Jan .9, 79.98
`
`W This action is FINAL.
`
`D Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed
`in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle. 1935 C.D. 11; 453 O.G. 213.
`
`monthlsl, or thirty days, whichever
`3
`A shortened statutory period for response to this action is set to expire
`is longer, from the mailing date of this communication. Failure to respond within the period for response will cause the
`application to become abandoned.
`(35 U.S.C. § 133). Extensions of time may be obtained under the provisions of
`37 CFR 1.136(8).
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`Xi Claimlsl 2-6 and 847
`
`Of the above, claimlsl
`
`:1 Claimlsl
`
`Xl Claimlsl 2-6 and 8-17
`
`Ii Claimlsl
`
`3 Claims
`
`‘
`
`is/are pending in the application.
`
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`is/are allowed.
`
`is/are rejected.
`
`is/are objected to.
`
`are subject to restriction or election requirement.
`
`Application Papers
`See the attached Notice of Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review, PTO-948.
`
`C The drawingls) filed on
`
`is/are objected to by the Examiner.
`
`The proposed drawing correction, filed on
`C The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`U The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner.
`
`is
`
`Cbpproved
`
`Ctlisapproved.
`
`:1 received in Application No. (Series Code/Serial Number)
`
`:1 received in this national stage application from the International Bureau [PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`‘Certified copies not received:
`Acknowledgement is made of a claim for domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e).
`
`Attachmentlsl
`
`X Notice of References Cited, PT_O~892
`’" information Disclosure Statementlsl, PTO-1449, Paper Nols].
`El interview Summary, PTO-413
`"‘ Notice of Draftsperson‘s Patent Drawing Review, PTO-948
`C Notice of lnformal'Patent Application. PTO-152
`
`--- SEE OFFICE ACTION ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES -
`
` U. 5. Patent and Trademark Olfice
`PTO-326 (Rev. 9-95)
`“
`Office Action Summary
`Part of Paper No.
`13
`
`
`
`Serial Number: 08/900,047
`
`Art Unit: 2503
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`Claims 4-6 and 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph, as being
`
`indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which
`
`applicant regards as the invention.
`
`Claims 4-6 and 10-12 recite the limitation “said electrically conducting plug”. There is
`
`insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the
`
`basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless --
`
`(e) the invention was described in a patent granted on an application for patent by another filed in the United
`States before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or on an international application by another who
`has fulfilled the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of section 37l© of this title before the invention
`thereof by the applicant for patent.
`
`Claims 3-6 and 9-14, 16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being
`
`anticipated by Chappell et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,541,427).
`
`Chappell et al. disclose a semiconductor structure and a method of forming a local
`
`interconnect in a semiconductor structure, comprising:
`
`a silicon substrate (10) having atop surface;
`
`
`
`Serial Number: O8/900,047
`
`Art Unit: 2503
`
`Page 3
`
`a diffusion region (43) formed in said substrate adjacent to said top surface;
`
`a polysilicon gate (18) formed on the top surface of said substrate juxtaposed to but not
`
`contacting said diffusion region;
`
`a sidewall spacer (28) adjacent to said polysilicon gate and disposed above said diffusion
`
`region;
`
`an insulator layer (36) substantially covering said polysilicon gate and said diffusion
`
`region; and
`
`a conducting plug (44a) at least partially filling a via in said insulation layer that exposes
`
`said sidewall spacer in the absence of said conducting plug, said conducting plug providing direct
`
`electrical communication between said polysilicon gate and said diffusion region. Note Chappell
`
`et al. Figure 8.
`
`In re claims 3 and 9, said insulator layer is formed of a material such as silicon oxide (see
`
`Chappell et al. column 4, lines 23 and 24).
`
`ln re claims 4-6 and 10-12, said conducting plug is a metal plug formed of a refractory
`
`material such as tungsten (see Chappell et al. colurrm 4, lines 66 and 67).
`
`In re claim 16, said polysilicon gate and said diffusion region are exposed in said via in the
`
`absence of said conducting plug (see Chappell et al. Figure 5).
`
`Therefore, Chappell et al. meet and anticipate the claims.
`
`
`
`Serial Number: 08/900,047
`
`Art Unit: 2503
`
`Page 4
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in
`section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are
`such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person
`having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the
`manner in which the invention was made.
`
`Claims 2, 8 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`Chappell et al. in view of Jones, Jr. (U.S. Patent No. 5,313,089), of record.
`
`The disclosure of Chappell et al. as discussed above. However, Chappell et al. fail to
`
`disclose forming the conductive plug with both a refractory metal layer and a layer of glue.
`Therefore, to provide the device of Chappell et al. with a conductive plug comprised ofan
`
`outer glue layer and a plug of a refractory metal as taught by Jones, Jr. would have been obvious
`
`to one of ordinary skill in this art because Jones, Jr. specifically teaches the process of forming a
`
`semiconductor device similar in structure and function to that of Chappell et al. having a
`
`conductive plug (32) within a dielectric layer (30) wherein said plug has a layer of glue and a plug
`
`of tungsten, as well known and commonly used in conductive plug technology (see Jones, Jr.
`
`column 3, lines 6468 and column 4, lines 1-17). Note Jones, Jr. Figure 2,
`
`Also, it is obviousthat the diffusion regions of Chappell et al. would be of N or P type
`
`conductivity because Chappell et al. specify that the regions are. Further, Jones, Jr. specify that
`
`the diffusion regions (16, 18) are heavily doped with an impurity (see Jones, Jr. column 3, lines
`
`23-24).
`
`
`
`Serial Number: 08/900,047
`
`Art Unit: 2503
`
`Page 5
`
`Response to Amendment
`
`The declaration filed on January 9, 1998 under 37 CFR 1.131 is sufficient to overcome the
`
`Sugiyama et al. (U.S.Patent No. 5,600,170) reference.
`
`Response to Arguments
`
`Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 2-6 and 8-17 have been considered but are
`
`moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection.
`
`Conclusion
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`disclosure. The reference to Fazan et al. (U.S. Patent No. 5,052,351) is cited to show a
`
`semiconductor device similar in structure to that of the present invention.
`
`Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office
`
`action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is
`
`reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO
`
`MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after
`
`the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period
`
`
`
`Serial Number: 08/900,047
`
`Art Unit: 2503
`
`Page 6
`
`will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37
`
`CFR l.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event will the
`
`statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner
`
`should be directed to Valencia Martin Wallace whose telephone number is (703) 308-4119. The
`
`examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Thursday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor,
`
`Mahshid Saadat, can be reached on (703) 308-4915. The fax phone number for this Group is
`
`(703)308-7723.
`
`Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding
`
`should be directed to the Group receptionist whose telephone number is (703) 308-0956.
`
`Martin Wallace
`
`February 17, 1998
`
`Primary Examiner
`Group 2500
`
`
`
`
`
` App|icant(s)
`Application No.
`08/900,047
`
`M
`
`
`
`Yen
`
`Examiner
`Valencia Martin Wallace
`
`Group Art
`2503
`
`it
`
`Page 1
`
`eéfildl
`of 1""
`
`Notice of References Cited
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`306
`
`
`
`u.s. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`NAME
`DATE
`cLAss
`DOCUMENT N0.
`
`’
`5,053,351
`10/‘! /91
`Fazan at al.
`
`
`257
`5,541,427
`7/30/96
`Chappell at al.
`
`
`
`
`
`J K L M
`
`-
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`NAME
`
`cuss
`
`suscuxss
`
`DOCUMENT NO.
`
`1
`
`l
`
`*1:
`_r
`i‘ N
`o
`4‘
`»
`-
`°
`*7 —
`= —
`T —:
`NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`DOCUMENT (Including Author. ma, Source. and Pamnem Pages)
`
`-
`u
`
`v
`
`w
`
`x
`
`U. S. Patent and Trademark Oflicz
`PTO-892 (Rev. 9-95)
`
`Notice of References Cited
`
`Part of Paper No.
`
`13