throbber
Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines
`Jack L. Kcrrebrock
`
`GE-1033.001
`
`

`
`Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines
`
`Jack L. Kerrebrock
`
`The MIT Press
`Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England
`
` '
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`Preface ix
`
`Acknowledgments xi
`
`1 I
`
`ntroduction to Concepts 1
`
`1.1 Thermal Efliciency 1
`1.2 Propulsive Eificiency 2
`1.3 Specific Impulse and Range 3
`1.4 Ramjets 4
`1.5 Turbojets 6
`1.6 Turbofans 7
`1.7 Shaft Engines: Regeneration 8
`1.8 Stationary Gas Turbines: Topping 11
`1.9 Energy Exchange, Mach Number, Reynolds Number
`1.10 Stresses 13
`1.11 Noise 13
`1.12 Thrust and Drag 14
`1.13 Some Engines in Cutaway 17
`Problems 20
`
`2 I
`
`deal Cycle Analysis: Trends 21
`
`2.1 Stagnation Temperature and Pressure 22
`2.2 The Ramjet 22
`2.3 The Turbojet 25
`2.4 The Afterburning Turbojet 28
`2.5 The Turbofan 31
`
`2.6 The Afterburning Turbofan 34
`2.7 The Turboprop 35
`2.8 The Regenerative Gas Turbine 39
`2.9 Gas Turbines for Topping 42
`2.10 The Importance of Turbine Inlet Temperature 43
`Problems 46
`
`3 Q
`
`uantitative Cycle Analysis 48
`
`3.1 Variation in Gas Properties 48
`3.2 Diffuser Pressure Recovery 49
`3.3 Compressor and Turbine Efficiencies 50
`3.4 Burner Efliciency and Pressure Loss 51
`3.5
`Imperfect Expansion Loss 52
`
` —j—j
`
`

`
`

`
`3.6 Heat Exchanger Effectiveness and Pressure Loss 53
`3.7 Turbujet with Losses 54
`3.8 Regenerative Gas Turbine with Losses 57
`3.9 Combined Gas Tu:-bine—Steam Cycles with Losses 61
`3.10 Concluding Comments 64
`References 65
`Problems 65
`
`4 N
`
`onrotating Components 66
`
`4.1 Summary of Gas Dynamics 66
`4.2 Diffusers 78
`4.3 Exhaust Nozzles 93
`4.4 Combustors and Afterburners 99
`References 113
`Problems 114
`
`5 C
`
`ompressors 1 16
`
`5.1 Energy Exchange, Rotor to Fluid 116
`5.2 Compressor Geometry and the Flow Pattern 123
`5.3 Limits on Stage Pressure Ratio and the Compromise with Efficiency
`and Mass Flow 143
`5.4 Stage Performance: Corrected Parameters 149
`5.5 Multistage Compressors 151
`5.6 Stall and Surge 154
`5.7 Centrifugal Compressors 157
`References 163
`Problems 163
`
`6 T
`
`urbines 166
`
`6.1 Turbine Stage Characteristics 167
`6.2 Turbine Blading 172
`6.3 Turbine Cooling 174
`6.4 Turbine Similarity 185
`References 186
`Problems 187
`
`

`
`7 S
`
`tructure of Engine Turbomachinery 189
`
`7,1 Centrifugal Stresses 189
`7.2 Gas Bending Loads on Blades 193
`7.3 Thermal Stresses 195
`7.4 Critical Speeds and Vibration 197
`7.5 Blade Flutter 203
`References 206
`Problems 206
`
`8 C
`
`omponent Matching and Engine Performance 208
`
`8.1 Compressor-Turbine Matching: The Gas Generator 208
`8.2 Gas Generat0r—Nozzle Matching 210
`8.3 Engine-Inlet Matching and Distortion 211
`8.4 Overall Performance 212
`8.5 Control and Acceleration 213
`References 220
`Problems 220
`
`9 A
`
`ircraft Engine Noise 222
`
`9.1 Noise Sources: Unsteady Flow 224
`9.2 Jet Noise 230
`9.3 Turbomachinery Noise 237
`9.4 Noise Measurement and Rules 245
`References 249
`Problems 250
`
`10
`
`Hypersonic Engines 251
`
`10.1 Hypersonic Inlets 253
`10.2 Heat Addition in High-Speed Flow 255
`10.3 Heat Release Due to Chemical Reactions 257
`10.4 Nozzle and Performance 262
`10.5 Cooling 263
`References 264
`Problems 265
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`11
`
`Propulsion Systems Analysis 266
`11.1 Takeoff 266
`11.2 Climb and Acceleration 267
`11.3 Cruise 271
`11.4 Maneuvering 273
`References 273
`Problems 273
`
`Index 275
`
`

`
`Preface
`
`This hook is intended to provide an introduction to the engineering of aircraft
`propulsion systems with the empltnsis on the engine, rather than on the dis-
`ciplines involved in its design. Because of the remarkable advances that have
`occurred since the large-scale introduction of gas turbine power plants into
`military aircraft in the [9505 and into commercial aircraft in the 19605, a
`clear tindcrstainling oi" the characteristics of these devices is needed at the
`undergraduate or early graduate level. Such understanding is essential both
`For entrance to professional work in the industry and for graduate study in
`the field. The understanding of a sophisticated engineering system that in-
`volves the sciences of Fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, chemistry, automatic
`control. and even psychology because of the problem of ait'crai'L noise, also
`has intrinsic value apart from its practical applications. At present, the
`ftindainental inf'ormatin'n required for such understanding is widely dispersed
`in the technical literature and subliterature. The aim of this hook is to draw
`the information together in a unified Form. so that the student can appreciate
`why aircraft propulsion systems have evolved to their present form and can
`thus be better prepared to contribute to their further evolution.
`Automotive and stationary applications ol' gas turbines are growing rapidly.
`They use much the same technology as aircraft gas turbines; indeed they have
`benefited greatly from the aircraft engine developments of the last two de-
`cades. While this book is directed primarily at aircraft engines, the discussions
`of component technology are equally applicable to these other applications.
`Some treatment ol‘ cycles has also been included for automotive and sta-
`tionary cngines in chapters 2 and 3.
`The approach in this hook is to treat the propulsion system at successively
`increasing levels of sophistication, beginning with a phenomenological dis-
`cussion in chapter 1 ol' the processes by which energy is converted from heat
`to meclianical energy to thrust.
`Several types of engines are then discussed in chapter 2 in the framework
`oi’ ideal cycle analysis, wliere the components of an actual engine are repre-
`sented parametricnlly in the analysis without quantitative reference to the
`engine structure. Here the dependence of the engine's performance on com-
`pressor pressure ratio and turbine inlet temperature is established, as well as
`the trends of thrust and spccilic impulse with flight Mach number. The argu-
`ments are repeated more quantitatively in cltapter 3 for a narrower spectrum
`of engines to convey the influence ol‘ nonidenlitics in the engine cycles.
`Chapters 4, 5, 6, and 7 examine the mechanical characteristics required of
`eueli rnajor engine component to achieve the parametric behavior assumed
`in the cycle analysis. At this step the enormous literature of the field must be
`abstracted and interpreted to clarify the important physical limitations and
`trends without submcrging the reader in vast analyses and data correlations.
`Naturally, the presentation is strongly influenced by my own viewpoint. If it
`
`
`
`

`
`errs in detail or by omission at some points, I hope that the overview will
`help the serious student to correct these inadequacies for liimsclll
`Cll3[_'|lEI.' S syntltesizes, from the cortiponent characteristics evolved in
`clinpters 4. 5. and 6, 2: complete gas generator and a complete propulsion
`system. An attempt is made to lreat in a reasonably uniform way the prob-
`Icms 0|‘ engine control, inlet-engine and engine-no’/7.le mulching, and inlet
`distortion, which so strongly dictate the ultimate performance of the system.
`The mechanisms by which aircraft engines produce noise are discussed
`in chapter 9. At its present state of development, this subject is both highly
`mathematical and highly empirical. While the mathematics of this chapter is
`somewhat more advanced than that in other chapters, it should be under-
`standable to a well-prepared college junior or senior. In any case, some care
`has been taken to make the physical arguments independent of the mathe-
`matics.
`
`Since flight at very high Mach numbers leads to complex chemical behavior
`of the air as it passes through the engine, the possibilities for airbreathing
`propulsion at Mach numbers above 6 are discussed separately in chapter 10,
`where the thermochemistry of high-temperature combustion products is
`included.
`
`l deals with some of the simpler techniques of propulsion
`Finally, chapter ]
`systems analysis, the tool used by the prelhninary designel‘ to determine which
`engine should be connnittetl to the lengthy and costly process of development.
`To understand this text, a student neetls good first courses in gasdynamics.
`thermodynamics, and solid mechanics along with the appropriate mathe-
`matics. These subjects will not be reviewed here, but some of the results of
`compressible flow are collected at the beginning of chapter 4.
`,
`Though this book developed from a one-semester undergraduate course in
`aircraft engines at MIT, it contains more inlhrmzition than can reasonably be
`taught in one semester. A good one-semester untlergratluate course in aircraft
`engines might consist of chapters 1 and 2 and the Following selections from
`the remaining chapters:
`Chapter 3: 3.1-3.5, 3.7
`Chapter 4: 4.1, 4.2.2.1—4.2.2.3, 4.3, 4.4.3, 4.4.4
`Chapter 5: 5.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.5, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6
`Chapter 6: 6.1, 6.1.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.3.1, 6.3.2, 6.4
`Chapter 7: 7.1-7.3
`Chapter 8: 8.1, 8.2, 8.4
`The text in its entirety is suitable for first-year graduate students with no
`prior exposure to aircraft engines.
`
`

`
`Acknowledgments
`
`My understanding of aircraft propulsion systems has benefited from associa-
`tions with many persons—from academe, from the industry, from NACA—
`NASA, and from the armed services——over the last two decades. Edward S.
`Taylor, James E. McCune, Jean [7. Louis. Alnjzy A. Mikol-.1_ic7.ak, and
`Leroy H. Smith have been pt1rl.ica.1larly helpful in t‘ormulatEi1g sr.-me of the
`arguments in chapter 5. Those faniiliar with the Leacltitig I-1I.'It]
`l‘L'SCZ!1'C.i‘l of
`Frank E. Marble of the Calil‘ornia Institute ofTccl.1nology will recognize the
`powerful influence he has had, first as te-.m'.-lier and later as colleague, on me
`and on this book. Special thanks are due to my students at MIT, who
`provided the motivation for writing the book, and to my wife Vickie, who
`helped immeasurably in bringing it to completion.
`
`

`
`

`
`Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines
`
`

`
`

`
`1 I
`
`ntroduction to Concepts
`
`All aircraft engines and gas turbines are heat engines, in which thermal energy
`derived from the combustion of fuel with air (or derived, perhaps, from a
`nuclear reactor) is converted to useful work in one way or another. The
`efficiency of this conversion—the ratio of useful work output to energy input
`by the fuel or reactor—is of major and growing concern.
`When the useful output of the gas turbine is in the form of shaft power
`used to drive a wheeled vehicle, a machine, or an electric generator, the
`cfliciency may usually be characterized by the thermal efiiciency familiar from
`thermodynamics, defined as the fraction of thermal energy input converted to
`mechanical work.
`
`In aircraft propulsion the useful work of the engine is work done in pro-
`pelling the aircraft. It is appropriate then to define a second efficiency, the
`propulsive efficiency, as the ratio of propulsive work to total mechanical
`work. Although analogous efficiencies of utilization can be defined for other
`applications _of gas turbines, the propulsive efiiciency is particularly important
`because it plays a dominant role in determining the configurations of aircraft
`engines. The different types of engines—ramjets, turbojets, turbofans, and
`turboprops—result from optimizing the overall efficiency, which is the product
`of thermal efficiency and propulsive elficiency, for different flight regimes.
`Overall efficiency, however, is not the sole criterion for engine design. In
`aircraft engines weight and size are also important. Cost, while high for
`optimum engines, is important. Recently, takeoff noise has become a major
`problem for commercial aircraft operators, so that noise produced per unit of
`thrust has become an important criterion for engine design.
`In automotive applications cost limits engines to much simpler and less
`eflicient designs than those evolved for aircraft. For stationary applications
`reliability, efliciency, and cost are controlling, while size and Wei ght are much
`less important.
`The purpose of this chapter is to describe the fundamental characteristics
`of gas turbines that control and limit their adaptation to any of these applica-
`tions. Some are thermodynamic, some fluid dynamic, some mechanical.
`
`1.1 Thermal Elficiency
`
`The conversion of thermal energy to mechanical energy is subject to the laws
`of thermodynamics. These laws determine an upper limit on the thermal
`efficiency that depends only on the temperatures at which heat is added to
`and rejected from the working fluid of the engine. Most gas turbines use the
`atmosphere as a heat sink, so that the minimum available heat rejection
`temperature is the atmospheric temperature, denoted by To. The maximum
`available heat addition temperature is in principle limited only by the char-
`acteristics of the combustion process (or nuclear reactor). In practice it may
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`be limited by the temperature capabilities of materials. If this maximum heat
`addition temperature is denoted by Tm, the maximum possible thermal efli-
`ciency is that attained by a Carnot cycle operating between these temperature
`extremes, expressed by
`T
`,,c=1——°.
`Tm
`
`(1.1)
`
`In the stratosphere (between ll and 30 km altitude), T0 is approximately
`217°K. Current aircraft gas turbines have peak temperatures near 1500 °K,
`so that 71, is approximately 0.85. Alltomotivc and stationary gas turbines
`generally have peak temperatures below |3[)0"K, for reasons of cost and
`durability, and they reject heat at about 300".K_. so |'or lhem If‘. is about 0.77.
`Actual engines have tlierinnl clliciencies lower than lhese. For comparison,
`the maximum possible efliciency for steam power plants is near 0.66.
`
`1.2 Propulsive Efficiency
`
`Unlike thermal efliciency the propulsive cfliciency, representing conversion
`between two forms of mechanical energy, is limited only by the laws of
`mechanics and can in principle approach unity, It is defined as
`
`thrust power delivered to vehicle
`17” _ net mechanical power in exhaust'
`
`The numerator is equal to the thrust multiplied by the flight velocity, while
`the denominator is the product of the mass flow and the increase in kinetic
`energy imparted by the engine to the airflow.
`By the conservation of momentum, the force acting on the engine due to
`the flow through it is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of
`the flow. If the mass flow per unit time is m, the flight velocity is uo, and the
`exhaust velocity is us, the thrust is
`
`F = rr'i(ue — uo),
`
`and the propulsive efficiency is
`
`(1.2)
`
`_ n'1 ue — uO)u0 _ 2u0
`(L3)
`11” _ m(uf/2 4 ué/2)_ue + u0'
`The propulsive efliciency decreases as the ratio of exhaust velocity to flight
`velocity increases. From (1.2), we can see that for a given mass flow and
`flight velocity, the thrust increases with u,/uo. Thus, a definite tradeoff must
`be made between propulsive cfliciency and thrust per unit mass flow. This
`relationship, shown in figure l.l, applies generally to all aircraft engines.
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`IO
`
`F/rhuo
`
`1.1 Propulsive efliciency as a function of thrust per unit of inlet air momentum, with ratio
`of exhaust velocity to flight velocity as parameter.
`
`Increased mass flow in general implies increased engine size and weight, and
`it may also increase drag.
`
`1.3 Specific Impulse and Range
`
`The discussion of engine types in terms of efliciencies links cycle analysis
`and thermodynamics, thus providing an intuitive grasp of propulsion system
`characteristics; but the propulsion system efficiency is usually characterized
`in terms of the specific impulse, defined as the number of units of thrust pro-
`duced per unit of fuel weight flow rate. This quantity enters directly into
`calculations of the fractional weight change of aircraft. It is denoted by 1.
`Suppose an aircraft is in steady, straight, and level flight. The thrust F
`must then equal the drag D. The aerodynamic performance of the airframe
`is characterized by its ratio of lift to drag L/D. Since the lift must equal the
`weight W of the aircraft, F = W/(L/D). Now the weight of the aircraft
`decreases as fuel is consumed; the rate of decrease is d W/dt = —F/I, by the
`definition of 1. Thus
`
`"_W _ _ L
`dt _
`I(L/D)’
`
`and if I and (L/D) are constant in time, the flight duration 1 is given by
`
`t = [(L/D) log
`
`m9._
`
`W,,— W,
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`where W, is the initial (gross) weight and Wf is the weight of fuel consumed.
`It is usual to present this result in terms of range, which is simply the pro-
`duct of the flight duration and the flight velocity uo, so that
`W
`(1.5)
`Range = u0I(L/D) l0g .
`Historically, much effort has gone toward increasing the range of aircraft.
`As a result, the fuel weight has become a substantial fraction of the gross
`weight, and the fraction Wg/( W9 ~ Wf) is considerably larger than unity.
`In this case, structural weight or engine weight affect the range logarithmi-
`cally, while I, uo, and (L/D) affect it directly, so a premium is put on these
`factors. On the other hand, when W9/( Wg — WI) is near unity, engine weight
`becomes as important as specific impulse, since it contributes to Wg.
`The specific impulse can be further related to this discussion of efliciencies
`by noting that the overall propulsion system efficiency is simply 11 =
`Fug/(-—dW/dt)h = Fuo/(F/I)h, where h is the energy content of the fuel. Thus
`the factor uol in (1.5) is simply 1111, the product of the energy content of the
`fuel (in units such as ft-lb per lb or m-kg per kg) and the efficiency with which
`it is used. The value of h for liquid hydrocarbon fuels isabout 4800 km.
`For hydrogen it is 14,300 km, and for methane, 5600 km.
`
`1.4 Ramjets
`
`Ramjets are conceptually the simplest of aircraft engines. Figure 1.2 is a
`schematic cross-sectional diagram of such an engine. Focusing for the present
`on the behavior of the airflow passing through the engine (indicated by the
`dashed inlet and exhaust streamtubes), we see that the schematic depicts only
`the internal functions of the engine. This engine consists of an inlet (diffuser),
`a combustor (burner), and a nozzle. The inlet decreases the flow velocity rel-
`
`inlet
`
`streurrrtub33
`
`fuel , Iii,
`
`diffuser
`
`".1
`
`burner
`
`"‘b»"b
`
`nozzle
`
`1.2 Schematic diagram of ramjet engine.
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`ative to the engine from the flight velocity uo to some smaller value uz. The
`difference in kinetic energies of the air (143/2 ~ u§/2) per unit mass is converted
`to an increase in thermal energy, so that T2 > T0; at the same time, the pres-
`sure increases from p0 to a higher value p2. Fuel is then mixed with the air, and
`the mixture is burned in the combustor. If the velocity uz is small compared
`to the sonic velocity (the Mach number M2 << 1), the combustion occurs at
`nearly constant pressure; the net result is that the thermal energy of the fluid
`increases, and its density decreases. In the nozzle the flow is expanded, ideally
`to the original pressure, with a consequent drop in temperature from T3 to
`T4 and an increase in kinetic energy 14,2,/2 — u§/2. Since T3 is larger than T2,
`the difference in thermal energies between stations 3 and 4 is larger than that
`between stations 2 and 0; therefore, the change in kinetic energy in the nozzle
`is larger than that in the inlet, and u4 is larger than uo. The change in
`momentum 144 — uo per unit mass flow provides the thrust.
`The conversion of thermal energy to mechanical energy is represented
`ide:-ilty by a Brayton cycle, as shown in figure 1.3. This cycle may be thought
`of us :1 sLI|1er|3osit.iun of a number of Carnot cycles, indicated by the small
`rectangles, ericli with a temperature ratio T2/To = T3/T4. Accordingly the
`maximum possible efficiency of the cycle is
`
`773 = 1 — To/Tr
`
`(1-6)
`
`The maximum efficiency can approach the limiting Carnot efficiency nc only
`if T2 approaches T3, that is, if all temperature rise occurs in the inlet rather
`than in the combustor. The thermal efficiency of the ideal ramjet is thus con-
`
`combustor
`
`1.3 Temperature-entropy diagram of Brayton cycle for ramjet, with elementary Carnot
`cycles of which it is composed.
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`trolled by the inlet compression process, which governs the temperature ratio
`T2/T0. In the ideal case where uz << uo this ratio approaches the stagnation
`to static temperature ratio of the inlet flow, T2/To = 1 + -§(y — 1)M§, so that
`
`%(v — 1)M3
`_
`"” "1+ %(r —1)M3’
`
`(1.7)
`
`where M0 is the flight Mach number and y = cl,/c,, is the ratio of specific
`heats. Thus for M0 < 1, T2/To approaches unity and the thermal efficiency
`of the ramjet becomes small. It becomes a highly efficient engine for MO > 3.
`In the ideal ramjet u4/uo (and hence up) is determined by the combustor
`temperature ratio T3/T2. For a given uo, increasing T3 will increase thrust,
`but reduce propulsive efliciency.
`
`1.5 Turbojets
`
`The poor performance of the ramjet at low Mach number is improved in
`the turbojet engine, shown schematically in figure 1.4, by the addition of a
`compressor. The compressor raises the air pressure and temperature prior to
`combustion and thus improves the cycle efliciency. The ideal Brayton cycle
`for the turbojet is shown by the full lines in figure 1.5. The thermal efficiency
`is now given by
`
`113 = 1 — To/T3.
`
`(1.8)
`
`If, for example, the compressor pressure ratio is 12, corresponding to an ideal
`compressor temperature ratio of 2.03, the ideal thermal efliciency is about 0.5.
`To drive the compressor the turbine must have a temperature drop roughly
`equal to the compressor temperature rise. Because T4 > T3, T4/T5 < T3/T2,
`and it follows that p5 > p2. Thus the combination of compressor, combustor,
`
`mam"
`
`1!. T;
`-I'\.rJL
`‘ T J\:.r— 41...‘.
`nozzle
`diffuser
`compressor turbine
`[
`I
`burner afterburner
`
`1.4 Schematic diagram of turbojct engine.
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`compressor
`inlet
`
`S
`
`1.5 Temperature-entropy diagram for Brayton cycle of turbojet, with afterburning
`modification shown dashed.
`
`and turbine, called a gas generator, produces a rise in pressure as well as in
`temperature of the airflow.
`Materials limitations in-the turbine at present r£:sl.rict the turbine inlet tem-
`perature T_, to values below those CO!‘l’CSpO[‘Il.llI‘lg to a stoichiomctric mixture
`of fuel and air in the comhustor. so that the turbine exhaust gas contains
`considerable residual oxygen. Additional thrust can he obtained by adding
`fuel in an afterbursier. The cycle For this modification is shown dashed in
`figure |.5. Because this Fuel is added at lower pressure (and temperature)
`than the fuel in the primary combustor. it is used less elliciently. The penalty
`at subsonic speeds is so large that afterhurning is used only for short bursts
`ol‘e>ttra thrust. At Mach Ittmtbers ol’ 2.5 or more, the allerburning turbojet
`becomes highly ellieient because the pressure rise associated with diffusion in
`the inlet raises the nozzle pressure ratio to it high value. as in the rainjet.
`The propulsive efliciency ol‘ :1 turbojet is determined in the same way as
`that o!' a ramjet, by the coruhtlstor temperature ratio. For an ideal engine
`on can be made to approach unity by letting T4, approach T1, but the thrust
`for a given engine size (or rnass flow) becomes s.n't:-ill.
`indicated by figure
`l.l. so that in practice this option is not applied.
`
`1.6 Turbofans
`
`A better way to improve the propulsive efficiency of the basic turbojet is
`offered by the turbofan, sketched in figure 1.6. Here, a second turbine is
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`prlmory nozzle
`
`burner
`
`Ian nozzle
`compressor
`
`‘fan
`
`1.6 Schematic diagram of turbofan engine for subsonic flight.
`
`added downstream of the compressor-drive turbine, and the power is used
`to drive a fan that pumps air through a secondary nozzle. By this means a
`portion of the energy of the primary jet is removed, its velocity is reduced,
`and the energy is transferred to the fan airstream. Thus the effective value of
`F/rimo is reduced and 11,, is increased as in figure 1.1; the penalty in engine
`weight is less than would be caused by decreasing T4. The turbofan powers
`most modern subsonic transport aircraft; it has replaced both the turbojet
`and turboprop in this application. Modified to include afterburning in the
`duct airflow or in the mixed primary and fan flows, it also powers many
`high-performance military aircraft and is a major contender for the super-
`sonic transport.
`
`1.7 Shaft Engines: Regeneration
`
`For low—speed flight vehicles, where prohibitive size and weight of duct
`would be required to yield a good propulsive efiiciency with a turbofan, the
`turboshaft engine is used. Here, most of the useful work is extracted from the
`exhaust gas by a turbine; it often rotates on a separate shaft from the gas
`generator, as sketched in figure 1.7, and may drive a propeller, helicopter
`rotor, the wheels of a truck, or any other machine.
`In land or marine applications, where weight and size are not primary
`considerations, regeneration is used to increase the thermal efliciency beyond
`that attainable with a simple Brayton cycle. The regenerator is a heat ex-
`changer that transfers heat from the exhaust gas to the compressor discharge
`air. As sketched in figure 1.8, this transfer can be accomplished with a rotat-
`ing heat storage matrix. The regenerative Brayton cycle is shown in figure
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`compressor
`
`burner
`
`power turbine
`
`gas
`generator
`turbine
`
`1.7 Schematic diagram of shaft turbine.
`
`centrifugal
`compressor
`
`rotating heat—storage
`reg enerut or
`
`1.8 Shaft turbine with centrifugal compressor, and rotating matrix regenerator.
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`combustor
`
`gas generator
`turbine
`
`shaft
`turbine
`
`S
`
`1.9 Temperature-entropy diagram for regenerative Brayton cycle.
`
`4
`
`gas turbine
`cycle
`
`5 c
`
`ideal turbine
`:‘?
`ll.’/actual turbine
`——
`- I
`‘”,aufi\
`Ilz steam cycle
`aL-----,gz-
`elementary Carnot cycle
`
`I1
`
`3
`
`1.10 A gas turbine-steam combined cycle.
`
`1.9 for the ideal situation where the temperature of the exhaust gas is reduced
`to that of the compressor discharge air. Since heat is added in this engine
`only between 3’ and 4, instead of between 3 and 4 as in the simple gas
`turbine, the regenerated engine will have higher efliciency than the simple
`one for the same compressor pressure ratio. In other words, for a fixed
`turbine inlet tcmpcrature T4, an acceptable cflicicncy can be obtained with a
`lower compression ratio in the regenerated than in the nonregenerated engine.
`Since eflicient, high pressure ratio compressors are complex and expensive,
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`regenerators are used in engines for automotive applications where cost is a
`major consideration.
`
`1.8 Stationary Gas Turbines: Topping
`
`The turbine inlet temperature of modern gas turbines is considerably higher
`than the peak steam temperature in steam power plants. Depending upon
`the compression ratio of the gas turbine, the turbine exhaust temperature
`may be high enough to permit eflicient generation of steam using the waste
`heat from the gas turbine. Such an arrangement is referred to as a gas turbine-
`combined cycle power plant. The cycle is shown in figure l.l0. It is capable
`of very high efficiencies when the turbine inlet temperature of the gas turbine
`is high. It’s advantage over the regenerative gas turbine is that the steam
`boiler is easier to manufacture and maintain than the regenerator.
`
`1.9 Energy Exchange, Mach Number, Reynolds Number
`
`Four types of energy excliange have been implicitly involved in the above
`rleseriptions of engines. These are (1) the ciccliangc within a flowing fluid ol’
`kinetic energy for thermal energy or vice vet's-.1; (2) transfer of energy to or
`from .1 lluicl by forces acting on moving blades; (3) the conversion of chemical
`energy to. thermal energy: and ‘{4} the traiisfer of thermal energy from solid
`bodies to flowing fluids.
`The exchange from kinetic energy to thermal energy occurs when the
`momentum of a fluid is changed by pressure forces. The increasing pressure
`compresses the gas and the compression work appears as an increase in
`internal (thermal) energy, according to the first law of thermodynamics.
`The Mach number is defined as the ratio of the flow velocity to the Velocity
`of sound in the fluid M = u/a. When squared, it may be viewed as a measure
`of the ratio of kinetic energy to thermal energy of the fluid. Thus
`
`to — 1)M 2 =
`
`1,42/2
`(1.9)
`OPT.
`It follows that if process (1) is to be important, changes in %(y — 1)M2 that
`are large compared to unity must occur. The ramjet depends entirely on this
`process of energy exchange, and this is the reason it must operate at Mach
`numbers above unity.
`The second process appears in the turbojet, the turbofan, the turboprop,
`and all other devices using fluid dynamic machinery. The air flow over a
`blade in a compressor, for example, exerts a force on the blade. If the blade
`moves in a direction opposite the force, then the blade does work on the air,
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`increasing its mechanical energy. Process (1) may take place at the same
`time, so that the overall change in fluid energy appears partly as kinetic
`energy and partly as thermal energy. Now the force exerted on a body per
`unit area by a fluid is proportional to puz/2, where p is the fluid density and
`u is the velocity, which may be taken to be the same order as the velocity of
`the body. The power delivered to the fluid by the body, per unit area, is
`then of the order of pua/2. Thermal energy of the fluid is convected by the
`body at the rate puc,,T per unit area. Thus the ratio of energy addition by
`the body to convected thermal energy per unit time and area is
`2
`
`pu3/2 = u
`puc,,T
`2c,,T
`
`= %(v - DMZ,
`
`(1-10)
`
`and it can be seen that the Mach number plays the same key role in process
`(2) as in process (1). For the moving blades of the compressor or turbine to
`effectively exchange energy with the air, they should move at a Mach number
`of unity or more.
`Process (3) is so familiar that it requires no elaboration, but process (4)
`requires some discussion. In gas turbines we are concerned primarily with
`convective heat transfer, that is, heat transfer that occurs between a solid
`surface and a fluid because of the motion of the fluid over the surface. The
`thermal effects of the surface on the fluid, like the viscous effects, are con-
`fined to a region near the surface that is thin compared to the characteristic
`length of the surface when the Reynolds number is large. That is, if we con-
`sider the flow over a flat plate of length L, as sketched in figure 1.11, with
`fluid density p, velocity u, and viscosity u, then the viscous effects penetrate
`a distance 6,, of order
`.__~_
`1
`5“
`p
`L
`puL = R—e'
`
`If the fluid has a Prandtl number cpa/k near unity, where /c is the thermal
`conductivity, or if the flow is turbulent, the thermal effect of the plate pene-
`trates a distance 5k z 5,, In most of the Components of a gas turbine, we
`wish to minimize viscous effects; hence we desire large Re and thin. boundary
`layers. But in a regenerator the thermal eflect must penetrate the entire flow,
`so either Re must be small or the ratio of spacing between heat transfer
`
`u
`
`5)"! 5|
`
`T-ifwfi,
`
`L
`
`1.1] The penetration of viscous and thermal effects into a. flowing fluid.
`
`

`
`Introduction to Concepts
`
`surfaces to their flow length must be small, of order 1/Re. In either case the
`result tends to be a bulky and heavy device compared to the compressor
`and turbine. For this reason regenerators are not found in aircraft engines.
`
`1.10 Stresses
`
`Since the speed of snunrl in air is: about 340n1,1scc at normal conditions, the
`hlading 0l' compressors and turbines. slwultl have velocities near 340 m/see or
`more. This |‘l3(|l.ll1‘C1‘l'lCIllL has forcetl the designer of gas turbine ettgities to cope
`with inztte-1'iuls, vibration, and stress problems of E}. very high order. By con~
`trast, the piston speed of a typical “high-speed" gasoline ertgine is only about
`15 m/sec.
`Some appreciation for the problem can be had by considering a prismatic
`bar rotating about an axis at one of its ends, as in figure 1.12, with an angular
`velocity cu. The stress in the bar at any radius, due to centrifugal forces, will
`be
`
`0 = j‘ T pwzr dr = (pcoz/2)[r-f — r2].
`
`V‘
`
`For r << rT, the stress is
`(1.11)
`_
`{
`<7/p = (corT)2/2.
`For [m'—_.
`to be 340 tnfsec. it is ttecessary to have :1 material with the ratio of
`properties crfp of the order of 6 X It)" rniiseez. For steel, with a density 0|‘
`8000 kg}
`"*, this implies a stress oft? : 4.3 x In“ N,’t'I12, close enough to
`the potential limit of the rnateri:-1| that great sopliistieation and care in design
`are required. The problem is compounded in the turbine by the exposure ol‘
`the rapidly rotating turbine hlttcles to hot exhaust gases. This factor, probably
`more than any otlter, has lirnitetl the pet'i'urm:1nce of aircraft gas turbines.
`
`1.11 Noise
`
`Acoustical noise is radiated from regions of fluctuating pressure, which may
`be produced in many ways. There are at least four sources of strong unsteady
`
`axis of rotation
`
`'r
`
`1.12 Bar, rotating about axis th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket