throbber
Japanese airline ANA to replace 100 Rolls engines on 787s
`
`about:reader?url=http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ana-rolls-royce-hldg...
`
`reuters.com
`
`By Alwyn Scott | SEATTLE
`
`SEATTLE ANA Holdings Inc (9202.T), Japan's largest airline, said
`on Wednesday it will replace all 100 Rolls-Royce engines on its
`fleet of Boeing (BA.N) 787 Dreamliners following three engine
`failures this year caused by corrosion and cracking of turbine
`blades.
`
`In response to questions from Reuters, ANA, the world's largest
`787 operator, said all 50 of its 787s will receive engines fitted with
`new blades, a process that could take up to three years.
`
`ANA has five engines that currently need repairs, "but we will
`replace all the 100 engines for enhanced safety measures," the
`company said, adding that it had already repaired three engines.
`
`A Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) spokesman said the engine
`maker would swap out existing blades for new ones on ANA's
`planes in the short term. Rolls has started production of a new
`blade design that will be ready by year end, he said.
`
`"We are working very closely with ANA," Rolls spokesman Richard
`
`1 of 3
`
`9/16/2016 1:29 PM
`
`1
`
`UTC 2003
`General Electric v. United Technologies
`IPR2016-01289
`
`

`
`Japanese airline ANA to replace 100 Rolls engines on 787s
`
`about:reader?url=http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ana-rolls-royce-hldg...
`
`Wray said in an email.
`
`The new blade will be incorporated next year into engines going
`onto new 787s, Wray said, adding that other airlines are managing
`the issue with "ongoing maintenance."
`
`Rolls-Royce Chief Executive Officer Warren East said on Tuesday
`that ANA's problem was a "manageable issue." He added that
`ANA's "intensive" use of the engines had caused the blades to
`wear more quickly than usual.
`
`ANA said the first engine failure happened on a flight from Kuala
`Lumpur to Tokyo in February. A second flight in March and a third in
`August had similar problems.
`
`On Wednesday, ANA said four 787s remained grounded and that it
`had canceled 18 domestic flights due to the engine problem. The
`airline said it expected no further cancellations through
`mid-September. Beyond that its schedule had not been finalized.
`
`The Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engine, one of two engines for the
`Boeing 787 jetliner, costs about $20 million at list price. General
`Electric Co (GE.N) makes the other 787 engine, known as the
`GEnx.
`
`Boeing's 787, built with lightweight carbon-fiber wings and fuselage,
`is a technological leap forward and burns 20 percent less fuel than
`the jets it replaces. But it was three years late coming to market
`and regulators grounded the fleet in 2013 after its lithium batteries
`overheated and burned.
`
`2 of 3
`
`9/16/2016 1:29 PM
`
`2
`
`

`
`Japanese airline ANA to replace 100 Rolls engines on 787s
`
`about:reader?url=http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ana-rolls-royce-hldg...
`
`Boeing has delivered about 445 of the planes, which seat 242 to
`290 passengers and cost $225 million to $265 million at list price.
`
`(Reporting by Alwyn Scott; Editing by Alan Crosby and Jonathan
`Oatis)
`
`3 of 3
`
`9/16/2016 1:29 PM
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket