throbber
COATINGS: LS'I‘:RSP:SPRAYING:WE}LDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`gas annular blast at the lower end of the melt crucible as it
`emerges through a hole into a reduced pressure area containing
`the substrate to be coated (Dunstan ef al l985). The droplets
`undergo in—flight cooling at 10
`to 10
`degxvsecond followed by
`a very fast deposition cooling and slow subsequent cooling.By
`controlling these stages a very thin liquid film is maintained on
`the surface of the coated substrate. Dendrites form in flight and
`shatter on impact, giving many nucleation sites and a fine equi~
`axed structure.One of the authors (M.G.HJ has seen this Osprey
`process and strongly recommends it for development and applica-
`tion.
`
`6.7. COATING BY %LD1B£
`
`6.7.1. GENERAL:
`
`Surfacing by welding is one of the most widely practised bulk
`coating techniques.Cladding methods form the other group.Fig.
`6»l9 gives a comparative idea of the properties of major hard-
`facing alloys. The major welding processes currently used for
`surfacing are:
`
`(MIG),
`Gas, Powder, Manual Metal Arc (MMA), Metal— Inert Gas
`Tungsten—Inert Gas MTG)
`(which includes Plasma—Arc), Submerged
`Arc and Friction Welding.
`
`Low s————-———-—— Abrasion Resistance —-—~—e High
`
`‘
`
`14°/aM -1-2i%C
`
`Arc
`
`.
`
`_ tube carbide _
`
`acetyiane
`tube carbide
`
`Cr-steels
`
`l
`
`Austenitic
`stainless
`steels
`
`’
`
`High SP9‘-ad Steels
`steels
`
`Austenitic
`&
`.
`.
`afifrftsensmc
`
`Heat and
`C 0 rm 5 i on
`R B SiSt8.nCe
`
`’
`
`Co- 8: Ni-base alloys
`
`High .e....____——.._ Impact Resistance —————_——.as Low
`
`Fig.6-19: Position profiles of the major types of hardfacing
`
`106
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`The tern1‘surfacing' is generally used where coatings are thicker
`than 1 mm on the substrate,
`to greater than 8 mm. Several
`layers
`can be applied by welding techniques,
`the thickness restricted
`only by the mechanical and physical limitations specified for the
`application of the product material
`i.e.
`the coated substrate.
`
`Bulk coating methods use coating material in the form of powder,
`sheet, strip,
`rod or paste, applied usually close to or above the
`melting point of the substrate—coating configuration. Amongst
`the bulk coating methods, welding, diffusion bonding and HIP
`methods result in an ig_situ diffusion bond unlike that obtained
`from overlay and other deposition methods. Bonding in overlay and
`other methods can occur by mechanical keying or over a period of
`time, by metallurgical bonding via thermal heat treatments, while
`bulk coating is wholly a metallurgical
`'bond‘
`formed during the
`liquid state with a good fraction of it containing the substrate
`material. Bulk coatings are applied to counter heavy wear and for
`use under conditions which impose mechanical and thermal shock.
`They have to be tough so as not
`to break under these conditions,
`apart from being metallurgically and chemically compatible to the
`substrate and resistant to the working environmenta The thickness
`is a compromise for the wear and tear demanded during service and
`the utility not
`too dependent on significant dimensional varia-
`tions as the coating wears. It is essential to achieve an opti~
`mised coating for the design service life, in View of the cost
`and bulk involved.
`
`6l?,2e WELD SURFACXEG
`
`A classification formulated by the British Steel Corporation may
`be considered representative of surfacing alloys normally used
`for coating by welding (Gregory 1980). The selection of
`the
`surfacing alloy involves three parameters at the outset, namely,
`the hardness,
`the purpose,
`and abrasion and/or oxidation resist-
`ance. Compatibility in characteristics with the substrate metal
`is the next
`important factor as only this ensures the integrity
`of fornxand performance of the finished component. In general,
`ferrous alloys are employed for abrasion resistance, nickel and
`cobalt alloys for oxidation and corrosion resistance, copper
`alloys for bearings, and, WC, chromium boride and similar com~
`pounds for wear resistance.
`
`The process is known severally as hardfacing, weld-cladding,
`overlaying and by other proprietary names. Welding is particular~
`ly suited for local repair work of damaged bulk—coated compo-
`nents. It essentially involves melting the coating material with
`or without a flux and inert gas, on the substrate to be covered.
`
`107
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYlNG:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`fiB7v3w EELD SURFACING PARAMETERS
`
`The foremost aspect is the dilu-
`tion which results on welding.
`When molten weld metal contacts
`the substrate the substrate sur-
`face also melts and the resul~
`
`\NmdBemj
`
`PWWWN Mam
`
`ting mixture is contained in the
`weld pool or
`the weld bead
`(Fig.6—2D). Dilution is defined
`as 100A A+B
`whereA is the
`amount 5; weld metal and B is
`the substrate metal
`in the weld
`pool. On solidification there
`will be a zone in between the_
`weld and the substrate which has
`a composition different from both the weld metal and the subs-
`trate. There will be an effective reduction in the original
`substrate thickness, but the total surfaced material will be
`thicker with the modified welded material bonded to the subs~
`trate. Dilution can vary from lO~40% and can be reduced to even
`5% depending on the welding method used.
`
`,.
`%’D”mmn==(A X‘Om“A'*B)
`F@l}20:DHmmn m a\NeM Bead
`
`The second parameter is the rate of deposition. The relative mass
`of coating dealt with in bulk surfacing far exceeds the normal
`rates ofildepositon. The latter are usually expressed in mg or g
`_ hr- while surfacing is defined in kilograms per hour.
`
`687943 EELD SURFACIEG METHODS
`
`Table 6:12 and Fig. 6-21 give some of the features of seven
`welding processes commonly used, Several variations on these
`basic themes are in practice. Oxy—acetylene methods are the
`slowest of all the methods causing also the minimum of dilution,
`as the flame temperature is much less than are temperatures. The
`feed material is a rod or powder and lands on the substrate in a
`small pool or as molten droplets respectively, which causes
`restrained fusion and hence there is very little or virtually no
`loss of the substrate into the weld zone.A precise control and
`on~site welding is possible but the methods are unsuitable for
`large scale operations.
`
`Very high temperatures are encountered in arc welding but TIG
`welding using a nonmconsumable W electrode is similar in scope to
`gas—welding in precision and operation, but somewhat higher in
`dilution and deposition rate. The plasma arc method improves on
`TIG— welding by employing two arc routes,
`the major arc current
`being the nonwtransferred arc passed between the W electrode and
`a water—cooled copper annulus around it, while the transfered arc
`passes between the electrode and the workpiece via the hot plasma
`issuing from the torch. Unlike TIG, plasma arc can cover large
`areas with precision and reguires minimum finish. But it cannot
`lay down a coating more than about 1,5 mm thick‘
`
`27?
`
`108
`
`

`
`ogmnwmgoenzm
`
`0.2
`
`<22
`
`~
`
`|NoomIuLu:_m+mE
`
`
`
`m1xu_+muugm
`
`oLmnu_L+oo_m
`
`-umo_o_;m:mmm
`
`
`
`_m+wEuou_o_;m
`
`mL_3m:o::_+coo
`
`
`mamam:0:cfl+co0
`
`cmLm>oo:x:_m
`
`m_nmm,:m:oms
`
`umm_cm:umE>..:¢
`tweenLO_m::m:
`
`
`
`_m:cmzm_nmm_cm;omz
`
`m_nm+Louc:oz
`
`m_am+Loa
`
`¢._+mmLm>umm>
`®«Dm%LOQICOZ
`
`N“
`
`
`
`L0_LQmLo++mumw
`
`
`
`+~m0umux:_+
`
`mvoL+uo_m
`
`“muoL+uo_mveg
`
`
`
`no;Lm_:n:+
`
`
`
`ecoomooL+om.m
`
`x:_+mc_c_m+
`
`omro.
`
`hx—
`
`m.NA
`
`m._v
`
`.;m#c_»
`
`
`
`nmw:m_n_xm:
`
`
`
`m®L_3ummwmm
`
`@Wm®LU:_coo
`
`zxmx~_o+m+mL
`
`
`
`-u.m_;m+:o;+Mz
`
`.mmmmc_
`
`o.n_mmoa
`
`
`
`@C_L_3U@Lum>o_com
`
`x:_¢.u_mgm
`
`+_moamumeow>L®>
`com.mL000
`
`
`
`m>vL:+m>Lm>
`
`L0_mo_+Lw>
`
`mom+Lsmm_++__
`
`
`ow_m.mL_3umLoo
`
`m:Mu_m3umm;Lm>o
`
`mwwuoLa
`
`ogmnm
`
`m2WDDaAuIQAmB
`
`nm4m<P
`
`.mmwI+;m:_r*m+mz
`oL<:"m+m2:_m::m:
`+0:o_+m_._m>
`I+L@:_|E®+W@c3F
`
`o_~
`
`
`
`“oL<13ummwAmmo
`
`oLm:omL<
`
`m:~n_m2ummw
`:3ocx1om_<
`
`“mm
`
`
`
`ognmEmm_m
`
`w_k
`
`w:m_>+momI>xo
`ummmuogm
`
`m.nm+Loa:coz
`
`
`
`o_nm+Loa.mo»
`
`
`
`®_Dm+LOQ.mm>
`
`um+_mI:0
`
`-u_mz
`
`m_nmm_cmnumE
`
`_m::m2
`
`LO_mu:mz
`
`
`
`_a:cmE>__oc;
`
`um¢>»
`
`L@U30&
`
`uom
`
`su.mz
`
`
`
`comL<.uLmmc+
`
`cm+_o£.;uLo+
`
`
`IUDLwm+m:_ugo:ou
`
`o+:_um+com
`
`m:+o+c_>+_>mgm
`
`
`
`Lmv_o;.+mo;
`
`pm_=:mLO
`
`+um+coum+mMaoLu
`
`o+c,m+mLsumm+
`
`.mzVmam+Lmc_
`.mu_m_;mAw:
`
`_ooaIuwm3
`
`m+mL+mn:m
`
`su_mxmmoEm.+
`
`.mmo:m>um_ooa
`
`mvoL+ow_@3m_nwEamcour:oz
`m_>um+Lmvzom
`
`>9Lmaaocm
`mu_>oLa0+WULDOW
`
`_,c>._m:+g_>
`
`m:mo.o
`
`m.o
`
`mamsou»mEm_m
`umnzomoogm
`
`3,.
`
`“EEmmmcxu_;+
`
`:o_+_moumo
`
`|_m_Lm+mE
`
`uegom
`
`.ak:o,+:__a
`
`:o~+_moamQ
`
`
`
`ugxmxw+nL
`
`109
`
`

`
`a. Oxy—acetylene hardfacing
`
`b. Manual metal-arc (MMA)
`harclfacing
`15
`
`id. Tungsten inert-gas (TIG)
`hardtacing
`
`Fig.6-21: Weld Surfacing Techniques
`
`ti. Manual Metal Arc (MMA);
`Weld Surfacing Techniques I a: Oxy-acetylene;
`c. Metal
`lnert—gas (MIG; d. Tungsten inert-gas{TlG);
`a. submerged are
`a. 1.Parent metal, 2. Weld metal, 3. Filler rod. 4. Blowplpe nozzle
`(introducing oxy-
`acetylene gas mixture, 15. Welding direction
`b. 1,2 ,t5 ~ as in a; 5. Slag, 6. Consumable electrode (core wire with a flux cover),
`7. Gas shield, 8. weld pool
`c. 1,2,B,7,8,t5 as in a,b above; the consumable electrode is fed through a contact
`which also carries the protective shielding gas supply
`d.
`i,2,3,7,8,t5 — as in a,b, above; 9. Non»-consumable electrode with a supply of
`shielding gas in a co-axial tube. 13. see ‘:2’ below.
`e. 1,2,5,8,15 - as in a, b above;
`10. Excess weld metal, 11. Granular Flux, 12. Flux
`Tube feed, 13. Gas shield, 14. Arc submerged in the excess weld pool
`
`tube
`
`110
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`MMA and MIG methods are more versatile and sturdy, capable of
`very high deposition rates. Vertical or overhead runs are possi-
`ble and on~site operations. The flux~cored arc welding method can
`give thicker deposits and higher deposition rates using flexible
`feed wire packed with its flux and additives. A fully mechanised
`but strictly workshop method is submerged—arc welding. Granular
`flux is deposited ahead of a continuous wire and the arc submer—
`ges, under the flux resulting in a weld surface requiring mimimum
`finish. Friction welding or surfacing is performed by pressing a
`rotating metal rod with its axis at right angles to a laterally
`moving substrate.
`
`A multiple strip weld surfacing schematic is shown in Fig. 6522.
`
`4. strip sheet electrodes
`3. are
`2. weld overlay
`1. Parent metal
`passed through feed rollers 5. are current source
`
`Flg.6~22. Schematic of multiple strip weld surfacing
`
`5.7.5. WELD COATED FIEISH
`
`Weld coated surfaces are usually wavy and slightly convoluted
`ending with a surface roughness of up to 2 mm difference between
`the maximum and minimum thickness. The wave nature is due to the
`electrode of a limited width having to pass to and fro on the
`work surface. Surface tension of the weld pool settling on the
`substrate which subsequently solidifies as the electrode passes
`on, causes an unevenness in the weld—coated surface.This sur~
`face roughness requires to be smoothed out by machining, grind-
`ing, polishing, or light abrading, For components like bulldozer
`blades or rock Crushers this may not be necessary, but it is
`essential for gear wheels or valve seats.
`
`Shrinkage effects during cooling can distort the coated component
`as stresses are created.lBending for instance, can be countered
`by offering the work pre—bent
`in the opposite direction along the
`same axis. Where thick layers or heavily restrained coatings are
`involved cracking is a possible or
`inevitable hazard. This can be
`compensated by applying an intermediate coat of soft~meta1
`(ductile) and by intermittent applications with pre-heating of
`components especially when hard and brittle alloys are deposited.
`
`286
`
`111
`
`

`
`COATINGS : LST:RSP:SPRAYING :WELDING:CLADDING 8: DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`6 . 3 . CLAD SURFACIEEG
`
`Cladding is a broad term used which includes methods such as
`explosive impact and magnetic impact bonding, or hot isostatic
`pressing (HIP) or cladding {BIC}, or mechanical bonding such as
`extrusion. This would introduce an overlapping between cladding
`and diffusion bonding when the above methods have to categorized.
`
`Cladding methods can be classified on the basis of the speed with
`which substrate to coating material bonding can be achieved.
`Table 6:13 shows the three groups with the bonding they achieve
`and other details (Bucklow l983). In general, the substrate is
`referred to as the backing plate and the coating material is
`called the flyer plate. Ferrous materials form the most handled
`clad components, with Ni-based alloys coming second. Other clad-
`ding alloys like Co alloys on steel are less used, chiefly in
`view of cost and availability. More detailed information may be
`had from the references appended (Bucklow 1983; Edmonds 1978;
`Bahrani
`l978; Bahrani
`l967}.
`
`Amongst the cladding methods listed, rolling and extrusion proce-
`sses are perhaps the most widely applied. Explosive bonding was
`accidentally discovered in 195?; hot isostatic pressing (HIP) and
`electromagnetic impact bonding (EMIB) are comparatively new;
`diffusion bonding process spans the early 20th century ferrous
`technology to date on Ni— base and other high temperature alloys
`for special applications. Some of the outstanding features of the
`above processes will be given in the following sections.
`
`538.1. ROLLIEG & EXTRUSI%
`
`This is the most economical of all cladding methods and the
`restriction in rolling and extrusion to sizes of components is
`only shop—capacity dependent. Both rolling and extrusion methods
`are practised for ferrous alloys with a wide variety of composi-
`tions and applications and for a number of Ni—based alloy/ferrous
`alloy combinations, Al~alloys
`and others have also been devet
`loped to meet
`increasing requirements for corrosion and oxidation
`resistance for ambient and high temperature applications in a
`variety of sulphur and chloride containing environments, and for
`high temperature uses ranging over energy, aviation and nuclear
`industries. Type 310 steel coextruded with 5OCr~5ONi alloy has
`been reported to have very good service under hot corrosion
`conditions in boiler systems (Meadowcroft 1987). Both rolled and
`extruded composite materials are only demand—limited, with the
`normal metallurgical limitations. Cladding materials are usually
`strip form, but powders can be employed quite effectively (Sugano
`et al l968L
`
`112
`
`

`
`TABLE 6:13 (L.H.S.)
`
`CLADDINS PROCESSES
`
`Group A
`UlTra—rapid cladding
`
`Process
`
`(6) Explosive
`Cladding
`
`(ll) Elecfromagnaflc
`lmpacf—Bondlng
`(a) Hot
`(b) Cold
`
`Tlme—facTor
`
`Mlcro~seconds
`
`Micro-seconds
`
`Pressure
`developed
`
`Subsfrafe
`shape
`
`Subsfrafe
`slze
`
`nof given
`
`350 MP8
`
`Simple; sheefs
`
`Simple; Tubes or rings only
`
`15 m2; max 55 m2
`
`<:30O nmz
`
`General
`requlremenf
`
`Thickness 3>lO mm;
`and af leasl 2X
`cladding sheaf
`lhlckness; suf-
`flcienfly ducflla
`
`Sufflclenf sfrengfh To wlTh-
`sTand magnelic discharge
`lmpacf
`
`Cladding
`maferlal
`
`Bonolng
`
`Sheef; reasonably
`ducTlle
`
`Shes? or pre~slnTered powder
`spray
`
`Solid slale, mech-
`anical keylng by
`shear flow,
`impacl
`& scouring acfion,
`afomlc conlacf &
`bonding
`
`Componenls hea-
`fed To recry-
`slaliisafion
`Temperalure;
`high speed
`hof pressure
`diffusion bonding
`
`in explosi-
`As
`ve cladding ~
`alomic keying
`as a resulf of
`a shock wave
`
`Bulky equlpmenf, expensive;
`small shapes resfrlcflon;
`C0mpOnenTS musf have good
`elecfrical conducfivlfy
`
`Safer fhan exploslve cladding
`very fasf
`
`Llmilaflons
`
`Advantages
`
`Comparafively
`lameama~
`subsfrale/clad
`sheets as They are
`easy To handle; Ex-
`ploslve hazard;
`Some maferial de—
`formafion needs
`correction
`
`Very fasf; very
`sfrong 8 confl-
`nuous bonds;
`unllmlled combi-
`nations; very
`lilfle surface
`preparafion
`required
`
`113
`
`

`
`TABLE 5—13 €R.H«S¢)
`
`CLADDENS PRGCESSES
`
`Group B
`Medium-flme claddlng
`
`Rolllng
`
`(ll) Exfruslon
`
`Group C
`Slow cladding
`
`(i) Diffusion-
`bonding
`
`(ll) Ho+ Isosfaflc
`Presslng (HlP)
`
`1-'2 minufes
`
`1-2 minufes
`
`10 mlnufes To >lO hours
`
`variable;
`10-100 N/mmz
`
`IOU-200 MP8
`
`Tube; rods
`
`Simple or complex
`
`Shop-capaclly
`
`Shop-capaclly
`
`Furnace—slze—
`dependenf
`
`Reasonably small
`
`Creep—reslsfan+
`
`Creep—resls+anf
`
`Shes?
`
`Tube or duclile
`
`sheef
`
`Sheef or powder
`
`Shes? or powder
`
`Mechanloal
`
`Mechanical
`
`Me?alEurgical
`
`Mefallurgical
`
`Shape resTrlcTlon;
`Several passes
`required lo ensure only ducfila coa-
`sound bonding.
`Ting maferials can
`Clad maferials
`be handled
`mus? be malleable
`
`Expensive equipmenf and Time consuming;
`uneconomlcal for large componenfs; hlgh
`Technology componenls are usually con-
`sidered for These fwo cladding mefhods
`
`Economical
`
`Leasl expensive;
`several pairs can
`be rolled in a pack;
`also allows com-
`posife rolling
`
`Well suilod for very complex shapes and
`high lechnology componenfs requlring close
`mefallurglcal confrol. HlP can be used for
`mefal—ceramlc bonding
`
`114
`
`

`
`1. Quality check of the two component tube materials
`2. Preparation of a ‘sleeve’ length of each component
`3. Special cleaning of
`the tube intervcontact surfaces
`necessary for a faultless metallurgical bond.
`Accurate surface machining and a thorough removal
`of contamination are vital steps.
`lnter—tube Gap controlled within tight
`
`limits
`
`.
`
`5\.*s~.~I-.'«I-.'~.\.x\\'s-t'~{\\\\~.*~tt
`
`Sleeves
`
`“
`
`“
`
`‘
`
`L
`
`lnter—tube
`
`The sleeves are end—weided to prevent contami-
`nation oiuring further processing
`
`6. The composite billet enters a furnace to bring
`it to extrusion temperature.
`7. Powdered glass is applied on the billet. At the
`extrusion temperature the molten glass acts as
`a iubricant.
`
`inner
`mandrel
`
`An inner mandrel concentric with an outer die
`are aligned as the composite billet bearing the
`lubricant enters the extrusion press (3000 tons)
`
`9. The bitlet undergoes a reduction as well as an
`etongation in the extrusion press.
`
`10. The extruded. clad tube is then cooled, and trimmed
`Further reductions can be carried out by reducing
`either cold or cooler temperatures.
`
`Fig.6—23: Co—Extrusion Process Steps
`
`115
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP':SPRAY:NG:WELDING:CLADDING 8: DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`some of the special features in rolling and or extrusion are:
`
`(i) A thin primary layer of electrodeposit usually ensures a
`better bond between the substrate creep resisting steel and th
`overlay clad material.
`’
`
`(ii) Cladding can be given with the substrate as a sandwich.
`
`(iii) With a parting agent, usually Cr2O3, several composite
`pairs or trios can be packed together in a single thin container
`or "can" of steel and then rolled together» The can is sometimes
`evacuated or back—filled with N2.
`
`(iv) The exposed edges oi the clad/substrate configuration are
`sealed by welding to prevent relaxation stresses from wrenching
`apart the rolled or extruded product.
`
`Covextrusion of clad tube is shown in Fig;6~23,
`
`5.8.2. EXPLOSIVE CLDDING
`
`This technique is also called explosive-welding.An accidental
`discovery in 1957 when a sheet metal got stuck to its die while
`an explosive experiment was carried out led to this method.An
`earlier report on the technique and its mechanism is available
`(Bahrani 1967; Bahrani 1978), and another has appeared in 1987
`(Hardwicke l987L The phenomenon seems to have been noted much
`earlier than 1957 in military circles when shells and metal frag~
`ments were seen to bond with metallic surfaces when impacted at
`certain angles.
`
`the modes of the
`Fig.6—24a,b illustrate schematically one of
`process operation(Bucklow l983L Bonding can be achieved by an
`oblique, or parallel high velocity collision between two plates
`to be joined. Shear and plastic flow are the instantaneous reac-
`tions as the shock wave speeds over the clad plate either at
`supersonic or sub—sonic velocities.
`
`The Method of Explosive Cladding (Bahrani 1967; Hardwicke 1987):
`
`The substrate plate is called the backing plate and the flyer
`plate is the cladding material. The backing plate must be at
`least twice the thickness of the flyer plate, preferably not less
`than 10 microns. Three basic requirements are as follows:
`
`1. The flyer plate is spaced at a ‘stand~of£ gap‘ parallel to the
`plate at a distance greater than its own thickness, or touching
`its edge to the substrate at an oblique angle. When explosion
`occurs the components must be brought
`together over
`this gap to
`collide progressively over the surface area.A collision front
`traverses this surface area.
`
`285
`
`116
`
`

`
`23.. Starting position of fiyer plate
`2. Fiyer—p|ate
`1. Backing plate
`- parallel
`to backing plate 3. Buffer
`4. Explosive
`5. Ftyenpiate after
`deformation by detonated expiosive. The two plates are interlocked
`during the instant of contact.
`
`xx
`’
`xxx
`a(1zv'4'4-F-'—'///2
`
`:'a’J/A‘/3'1’/(‘r'/o’¢‘
`\\‘s\‘x’~.'».
`12/2122
`-.-.
`
`Melt flow and interlocking configuration at
`
`the impact region
`
`Fig.6—24 a,b; Schematic diagram of Explosive Cladding
`
`117
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`is placed on the flyer plate
`2. A protective (buffer) sheet
`(usually rubber) and the explosive is spread on it as a slurry or
`a sheet. The quantity of the explosive must be controlled to
`result in an optimum detonation velocity of, est 2000 m/s for a
`thick plate. Slow explosions fail to secure a good bond and
`larger magnitude could shatter, distort, spell or melt the clad-
`ding. The velocity of the collision front must be below sonic
`velocity in the metals being joined. Shock waves travel
`through
`the materials at the velocity of sound. The subsonic velocity
`level of the collision front ensures that the shock wave precedes
`the bond being formed at the collision front.Failing this pro-
`duces non—bonding or immature bonding in the composite.
`The
`explosion initiates this progressive shock wave which shear
`im-
`pacts the flyer plate to the backing plate.At Suchaahigh speed
`and pressure,
`the surfaces also get heated up and squirt out in a
`scouring action as if they are liquid. The surfaces of both
`contacting faces are pushed out along with any contaminants, e.g.
`oxide layers and atomically clean surfaces look into each other.
`
`3. The interfacial pressure at the collision front must signifi-
`cantly exceed the material yield strength to enable plastic
`deformation.
`
`The collision angle of the flyer and backing plates determines
`the interface wave vortex morphology of the resulting composite.
`The volume of entrapped melt at the interface and the associated
`bond strength depend on the collision angle. A low collision
`angle results in an interlocking with a large vortex and a high
`degree of entrapped material as if it is a frozen melt. If the
`angle is very low the vortices link up and become continuous,
`instead of being discretely isolated,
`and the resulting bond is
`highly undesirable, since, effectively there are three layers of
`uncertain bond strength. The higher the collision angle,
`the more
`undulated the wave form will be with reduced vortices and entrap-
`ped melt. A very steep angle could result in a completly flat
`surface with little or no entrapped melt. The steep angle detona-
`tion configuration was thought commercially noneviable but has
`been achieved and patented (Szecket et al 1985;
`lnal et al l985L
`
`It seems that this process is only suitable for large masses of
`metal, but
`in principle ought to be applicable to any metal—metal
`bond as long as they are not Very brittle, and have simple shapes
`such as sheets,
`tubes, and low convex~conCave radius components -
`crucibles etc. Direct cladding of large areas, for instance 30
`sq.m., have been produced and thin sheet composite cladders
`fusion welded together from 2 metre wide strips. Double sided
`clads, with the cladders bonded simultaneously have also been
`reported. Cup forgings and tube forgings have been streamlined. A
`better understanding of the process has enabled bonding of many
`metals and alloys. Laminar composites of alternating material
`layers of widely divergent mechanical properties have unique
`resistance to fatigue failure. Transition composite joints can be
`produced in tubular or flat form with two dissimilar metals.
`bonding of strictly identical materials (for multi~layer lami-
`
`287
`
`118
`
`

`
`lm_mWmm_____,l__
`
`M.
`
`L
`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`nates) which are almost impossible to diffusion bond, e.g. Al—Li
`alloys, are very successfully explosion bonded.
`Imploded Zr—a1loy
`to outer steel tubes have proved their worth in drilling tube
`service in sour gas oil wells.
`
`The method has been found especially useful to bond normally
`‘mismatched'alloy bi—, tri- and quad—laminates,e.g.a V~20Ti
`bonded to M0 or Nb which itself was bonded to Cu (Kaminsky 1980);
`Pt, V, or Mo bonded to Ni—Cr-Fe~, or Fe—22Cr- alloys for high
`temperature use. Most of the clad materials listed by Gregory
`(1980) can be explosively bonded. A number of alloy combinations
`have emerged. Conversion rolling,
`formerly strictly reserved for
`stainless steel are now common for copper—nickel, all of Ti~base
`alloys, Hastelloys, many nickel alloys and Zr-clads. Zr-alloys
`which used Ti as interlayer, now are clad without it.Aerospace
`transition joints of Ti6Al4V to stainless steel, Al~alloys to Ti-
`alloys, multi-layer laminates of Al-Li alloys rank amongst the
`advances made by explosive cladding (Hardwicke 1987). Particular
`mention may be made of the straight waveless interface of Al
`to
`steel and Ti6Al4V to mild steel (szeoket et al 1985; Inal et al
`1985).
`
`6.9- DIFFUSIO BONEING
`
`A majority of coating processes include heat treatment as an
`intermediate or an ultimate step to ensure a sound substrate to
`deposit bond. Thus, almost all “non~overlay" deposition can be
`termed as diffusion bonds. This section discusses diffusion bond-
`
`ing employed as a primary process unlike its secondary role in
`other deposition techniques.
`
`Diffusion bonding is a solid state method where component parts
`are pressed together and heated to form a bond by interdiffusion.
`Diffusion bonding requires high temperature data of all the
`components used in metallurgical technology for the concerned
`substrate—coating complex. Yet, the least characterized of all
`metallurgical parameters seems to be in the diffusion reaction
`area, e.g. diffusion constants for elements in multi-component
`alloys. Often, simplified or estimated values are extrapolated.
`This is perhaps, one of the important areas where futher fundam-
`ental research is needed.
`
`Diffusion bonding is a slow process because a metallurgical bond
`by elements is achieved between two surfaces in Contact by a
`solid-state diffusion process giving rise to a three~zone compo-
`site. Composition, microstructure, physical, chemical and mecha-
`nical properties are affected and controlled by the duration of
`heat treatment,
`the temperature and the pressure at which the
`process is carried out and the rate and type of cooling given
`subsequently.§me physical, chemical and mechanical properties
`for the composite, such as hardness, stress/strain, oxidation,
`corrosion effects, microstructure etc” help in material selec~
`
`288
`
`119
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`tion and use. These are the parameters which decide diffusion
`bonding as a cladding process. Elliott and Wallach (1981) consi-
`der five main process parameters to be time,
`temperature, pres-
`sure, surface condition and environment. Unless otherwise stated
`diffusion bonding is carried out under vacuum in order to prevent
`inclusions and oxidation.
`
`Diffusion bonding is also termed as solidvstate welding.A few
`useful sources of information are appended: Tylecote 1968; Bartle
`1969; Gerken & Owczarski 1965; Bartle 1978; Ohashi & Hashimoto
`1976; Fielding l978. Drewett
`(l969a,b) discusses diffusion coat~
`ings on steel on a wider context; Derby and Wallach (1982)
`present a theoretical model for solid~state diffusion bonding.
`Diffusion bonding is a suitable technique for joining materials
`which are difficult to join by conventional welding methods (e.g.
`Ti and its alloys) and to achieve bonding on a more commonly used
`material,e.g.stee1.
`
`6.9.1“ PBIERX CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFUSIG BONDIRG
`
`Two material layers can be bonded when brought into elemental
`contact with an applied interfacial pressure at high temperature
`in the region 0.5— 0.8 Tm where Tm is the melting point in deg-
`rees Kelvin, of
`the material being bonded. Often additional
`layers in the fornlof coatings of a few microns, or loose shims
`are interposed to facilitate bonding or
`to act as diffusion
`barriers to specific elements.
`
`The advantages of diffusion bonding are (Derby & Wallach 1982M
`
`(i) Large areas can be joined.
`
`(ii) Metal joining is possible under unconventional situations,
`e.g. space environment, or as part of a superplastic and bonding
`sequence.
`
`(iii) Bonding is possible with minimunadeformation.
`
`(iv) Minimum microstructural damage and stress results while
`keeping a thin diffusion zone and smaller thermal gradients occur
`than in processes like fusion welding.
`
`The disadvantages are:
`
`(i) Poor adherence over large areas due to impurities such as
`oxides or grit at the interface.
`
`(ii) Poor bonding due to interface separation via vacancy concen-
`tration and void formation during diffusionr
`
`(iii) Unknown.therma1 effects on the properties of the bonding
`elements.
`
`289
`
`120
`
`

`
`Hm
`
`“.3
`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP:SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`6.9.2. BONIEG EECHAEISH
`
`Derby and Wallach summarise earlier approaches in their 1982
`review in their model. The presence of an oxide film on the
`substrate is considered an inhibitor but not as rate determining
`to bonding since except for metals with insoluble oxides, e.g.
`Al,
`the oxide dissolves rapidly in the parent metal as bonding
`proceeds. The diffusion layer formed at the interface could be a
`solid—state bonding, purely mechanical, or a phase reaction in a
`solid—state exchange or a eutectic substrate—coating phase trans—
`formed to a solid microstructure on cooling.Surface roughness
`requires data specific to the material considered and generaliza-
`tion is not possible. The authors propose a broader based mecha~
`nism by considering diffusion bonding analogous to pressure sin~
`tering. The proposed six mechanisms of mass transfer are:
`
`l. Surface diffusion from surface sources to a neck.
`2. Volume diffusion from surface sources to a neck.
`
`3. Diffusion along the bond interface from interfacial sources to
`a neck
`. Volume diffusion from interfacial sources to a neck.
`
`4 5
`
`law creep deforming the ridge.
`. Power
`6. Plastic yielding deforming the ridge.
`
`1 and 2 above are surface source related, driven by surface
`curvature differences across the surface of an interfacial void.
`
`3 and 4 consider chemical potential along the bond line as dri-
`ving force while 5 and 6 are gross deformation mechanisms driven
`by applied pressure with some surface tension effects. Five
`process parameters have been interwoven to apply the above six
`mechanisms, namely,
`temperature, pressure, initial surface rough-
`ness,
`initial surface aspect ratio and time.
`
`Computer mapping yields the theoretical data which ironically
`offer limited verification for lack of adequate high temperature
`diffusion and creep data. Almond et al
`(i983) envisage a pressure
`—sinter mechanism in the diffusion bond of hard metal joints,
`lending partial support to the Derby~Wallach model. They consider
`an evaporation—condensation mechanism in the case of WC—Co wear
`resistant bonds.Further experimental work in high temperature
`creep, diffusion and most other physico-mechanical properties is
`needed.
`
`6.9.3.. ROLE OF I YERS IE DIFFUSION BOWING
`
`The practical side of diffusion bonding has side—stepped techni-
`cal difficulties in straight metal—to—metal bonding by using
`intermediate layers.
`
`these prevent oxidation of the substrate
`1. Applied as coatings,
`prior to bonding (Crane 1967; Kammer et al 1969),
`
`290
`
`121
`
`

`
`COATINGS: LST:RSP.'.SPRAYING:WELDING:CLADDING & DIFFUSION METHODS
`
`1 They assist micro-deformation and establish contact between
`faying surfaces (Bartle 1978; Hauser et al 1967),
`
`3. They obviate bonding inhibition caused by contaminant films by
`increasing the rate of their dissolution,
`
`4. They enhance the diffusion rates (Kharchenko 1969; Davis &
`Stephenson l962; Lehrer & Schwartzbart l96l) and,
`
`5. They can minimise Kirkendall void formation and prevent or
`reduce intermetallic phases at the interface (Crane l967L
`
`The above five causes have been inferred in the context of diffe-
`rent diffusion bond pairs. Much more work is required to asso-
`ciate any of these with a proven mechanism (Elliott & Wallach
`1981).
`
`.6.9.4. DIFFUSION BONDED MAT
`
`Aluminium on steels has been an industrial diffusion bond techni-
`
`que for nearly four decades. Aluminizing and chromizing on steels
`over forty years and later on Ni~ base alloys over
`the last
`twenty years have been, consequently, the most investigated of
`all diffusion bond systems. High temperature and/or corrosion
`resistant materials such as Co—, Ti—, Mo—, and W— alloys have
`been investigated more recently. Materials listed by Gregory
`(1980) provide a reasonable cross section. Table 6:14 gives a
`list of elements which may or may not form good diffusion coa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket