throbber
.
`(cid:14)
`Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`
`Current status of environmental barrier coatings for Si-Based
`ceramics
`
`K.N. LeeU
`Chemical Engineering Department, Cle¤eland State Uni¤ersity, Cle¤eland, OH, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`Silicon-based ceramics are the leading candidates for high temperature structural components in next generation gas turbine
`engines. One key drawback of silicon-based ceramics for such an application is volatilization of the protective silica scale in water
`vapor and the resulting rapid ceramic recession. Therefore, the realization of Si-based ceramics components in advanced gas
`turbine engines depends on the development of protection schemes from water vapor attack. Currently, plasma-sprayed external
`(cid:14)
`.
`environmental barrier coatings EBCs are the most promising approach. In the late 1980s and early 1990s a wide range of
`refractory oxide materials were tested as coatings on Si-based ceramics to provide protection from hot corrosion. After the
`discovery of silica volatilization in water vapor in the early 1990s, the focus of EBC development research has been shifted
`towards the protection from water vapor attack. Experience learned form the earlier coating developmental effort provided the
`foundation upon which more complex and advanced EBC coatings have been developed. This paper will discuss the brief history
`and the current status of EBC development for Si-based ceramics with the main focus on water vapor protection. Q 2000 Elsevier
`Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Environmental barrier coatings; Si-based ceramics; Mullite-based composite bond coat; BSAS
`
`1. Introduction
`
`One key barrier to the application of advanced sili-
`con-based ceramics and composites for hot section
`structural components in gas turbines is their lack of
`environmental durability. Silicon-based ceramics ex-
`hibit excellent oxidation resistance in clean, dry oxygen,
`w x
`by forming a slow-growing, dense silica scale 1 . How-
`ever, the normally protective silica scale can be severely
`degraded by reacting with impurities, such as alkali
`w x
`w x
`salts 2 or water vapor 3 . Oxide coatings are a promis-
`ing approach to providing environmental protection for
`advanced heat engine components because oxides are
`in general more resistant than silicon-based ceramics
`w x
`to corrosive environments 4 .
`
`U Resident Researcher of NASA Glenn Research Centre MS106-1,
`21000 Brook Park Road, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland,
`OH 44135, USA. Tel.: q1-216-433-5634; fax: q1-216-433-5544.
`(cid:14)
`.
`E-mail address: kang.n.lee@grc.nasa.gov K.N. Lee .
`
`There are several key issues that must be considered
`w
`x
`in selecting coating materials 5,6 . Fig. 1 schematically
`shows the key issues. Firstly, the coating must possess
`the ability to resist reaction with aggressive environ-
`ments, as well as low oxygen permeability to limit the
`transport of oxygen. Secondly, the coating must possess
`(cid:14)
`.
`a coefficient of thermal expansion CTE close to that
`of the substrate material to prevent delamination or
`cracking due to CTE mis-match stress. Thirdly, the
`coating must maintain a stable phase under thermal
`exposure. Phase transformation typically accompanies
`a volumetric change, disrupting the integrity of the
`coating. Fourthly, the coating must be chemically com-
`patible with the substrate to avoid detrimental chemi-
`cal interaction.
`Early coatings work focused on protecting silicon-
`based ceramics from molten salt corrosion. Mullite has
`attracted interest as a coating for Si-based ceramics
`mainly because of its close CTE match with SiC. Fig. 2
`shows the evolution of mullite and mulliterrefractory
`
`0257-8972r00r$ - see front matter Q 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`(cid:14)
`.
`PII: S 0 2 5 7 - 8 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 8 8 9 - 6
`
`GE-1011.001
`
`

`
`2
`
`K.N. Lee r Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`)
`(
`
`Fig. 1. Key issues in selecting coating materials.
`
`oxide coating systems. Solar Turbines initiated the de-
`velopment of plasma-sprayed refractory oxide coatings
`to protect SiC heat exchanger tubes from hot corrosion
`w x7 . Single layer mullite coatings showed the best dura-
`bility in thermal cycling and in hot corrosion tests.
`However, plasma-sprayed mullite coatings tended to
`develop cracks during thermal exposure. Corrosive
`species penetrated the cracks and attacked the SiC
`(cid:14)
`.
`substrates. Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL
`developed an aqueous slurry process to apply refractory
`oxide coatings containing approximately 50]90 wt.%
`w x
`alumina 8 . Coatings containing mullite as the major
`phase performed the best, however, all coatings cracked
`
`and delaminated from the SiC during thermal expo-
`sure.
`The NASA Glenn group discovered that plasma-
`sprayed mullite contained a large amount of amor-
`phous mullite due to the rapid cooling rate during
`w x
`solidification 9 . The crystallization of amorphous mul-
`lite, accompanying a volumetric contraction, was identi-
`fied as the primary source of cracking in plasma-sprayed
`(cid:14)
`.
`mullite coatings Fig. 3 . Subsequently, a modified
`plasma spraying process was developed at NASA Glenn,
`which successfully eliminated most of the amorphous
`mullite from the coating. The second-generation
`plasma-sprayed mullite coating exhibited dramatically
`improved thermal shock resistance and durability, re-
`maining adherent out to 1200 h at temperatures up to
`w
`x
`13008C in air 6,10 and out to 150 h at 10008C in a high
`w
`x
`pressure hot corrosion burner rig 11 .
`By the mid 1990s, the volatilization of silica in water
`vapor and the resulting rapid recession of silicon-based
`ceramics emerged as a showstopper for the application
`of silicon-based ceramics in combustion environments
`w x3 , shifting the focus of coatings research to protection
`
`Fig. 2. Evolution of mullite and mulliterrefractory oxide coating systems.
`
`.
`(cid:14)
`Fig. 3. Comparison of first generation vs. second-generation plasma-sprayed mullite 48 h, 10008C, 2 h cycle, air .
`
`GE-1011.002
`
`

`
`K.N. Lee r Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`)
`(
`
`3
`
`from water vapor. Mullite was found to lose silica
`through volatilization, leaving a porous alumina layer
`on the surface in simulated combustion environments
`(cid:14)8-mm-thick porous alumina after 50 h at 12308C, 6
`. w
`x (cid:14)
`atm., gas velocitys2000 cmrs 12 Fig. 4 . Therefore,
`.
`an environmental overlay coating was necessary when
`protection from water vapor was needed. NASA Glenn
`(cid:14)
`selected yttria-stabilized zirconia YSZ; ZrO ]8 wt.%
`2
`.
`Y O as the baseline overlay coating because of its
`2
`3
`proven performance as a thermal barrier coating in
`w
`x
`combustion environments 11 . Despite the large CTE
`of YSZ, the mulliterYSZ-coated SiC showed excellent
`w x
`adherence under thermal cycling in air 6 and sup-
`pressed silica volatilization in simulated combustion
`w
`x (cid:14)
`environments 13 Fig. 5 . The mulliterYSZ system,
`.
`however, developed water vapor-enhanced oxidation
`after approximately 100 h at 13008C. The enhanced
`oxidation was initiated in areas where cracks in the
`mullite intersected the SiC interface, since water vapor
`transported through the cracks and attacked the sub-
`w
`x
`(cid:14)
`.
`strate
`14
`Fig. 6 . There was evidence of silica
`(cid:14)
`.
`volatilization at the bottom of cracks Fig. 6 . Water
`vapor, the predominant oxidant in a H OrO environ-
`2
`2
`ment, is known to enhance the oxidation of SiC. The
`silica scale formed in high water vapor is porous, al-
`lowing the oxidation to propagate readily along the
`interface. The porous scale was attributed to the gener-
`ation of gaseous silicon hydroxide species.
`
`2. Development of current state-of-the-art
`(
`)
`environmental barrier coatings EBCs
`
`Key durability issues in the mullite-based coating
`(cid:14) .
`system in water vapor include:
`i
`through-thickness
`(cid:14) .
`ii weak bonding of mullite
`cracking in the mullite;
`(cid:14)
`.
`onto silicon-based ceramics; and iii
`interface contami-
`w
`x
`nation 13 . Through-thickness-cracks provided a path
`
`(cid:14)
`Fig. 4. Mullite in high-pressure burner rig 50 h, 12308C, 6 atm.,
`equivalence ratios1.9, ¤ s 2000 cmrs .
`.
`gas
`
`for water vapor to oxidize the substrate, leading to the
`eventual failure of the system. YSZ overlay coating
`failed to seal the cracks in mullite since YSZ also
`cracked due to the large CTE mis-match between the
`two layers. It
`is believed that
`the development of
`through-thickness-cracks in mullite is due to stresses in
`w
`x
`the coating 13 . The presence of second phases, such
`as residual amorphous mullite and alumina,
`in the
`mullite coating and the resulting volumetric shrinkage
`and CTE mis-match are suggested to be the major
`sources for the stresses in the coating. Mullite does not
`form a strong chemical bond with SiC according to a
`w
`x
`diffusion couple study in our lab 15 . Thus, the mul-
`literSiC bond of as-sprayed coatings is mainly due to
`mechanical interlocking. Interfacial contamination can
`degrade coating durability by altering the physical and
`
`Fig. 5. Mullite and mulliterYSZ-coated SiC in high-pressure burner rig 12308C, 6 atm., equivalence ratios1.9, ¤ s 2000 cmrs .
`.
`(cid:14)
`gas
`
`GE-1011.003
`
`

`
`4
`
`K.N. Lee r Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`)
`(
`
`Fig. 6. Mullite and mulliterYSZ-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor furnace 200 h, 13008C, 2 h cycle, 90% H OrO , 1 atm. .
`.
`(cid:14)
`2
`2
`
`chemical properties of the silica scale, especially growth
`w
`x
`rate, viscosity and porosity 16 .
`The crack resistance of mullite coating can be im-
`proved by modifying the physical properties of the
`coating or by sealing the cracks with a crack-resistant
`w
`x
`overlay coating 13 . A new, mullite-based composite
`bond coat with substantially improved crack resistance
`(cid:14)
`and a crack-resistant, low silica activity top coat BSAS:
`.
`BaO-SrO-Al O -SiO were developed under the high
`2
`3
`2
`(cid:14)
`speed research-enabling propulsion materials HSR-
`.
`EPM program. Today these coatings are referred to as
`EBCs. Replacing the YSZ top coat in the mulliterYSZ
`system with BSAS delayed the onset of accelerated
`(cid:14)
`oxidation in water vapor by a factor of at least two Fig.
`.7 . Further improvement in durability was achieved by
`replacing the mullite bond coat with the mullite-BSAS
`
`.
`(cid:14)
`composite bond coat Fig. 8 , while still further im-
`provement was achieved in the composite bond
`coatrBSAS duplex coating system EPM EBC Fig. 9 .
`(cid:14)
`. (cid:14)
`.
`The improved water vapor durability with the compos-
`ite bond coat and the BSAS top coat was attributed to
`the excellent crack resistance of these coatings.
`It has been shown that EBC durability can also be
`enhanced by improving the adherence through the
`modification of the mullite bond coatrSiC interface
`w
`x
`17]19 . It was discovered in the HSR-EPM program
`that silicon is an excellent bond layer to improve the
`adherence of mullite onto SiC. EPM EBC-coated MI
`covered with a Si surface layer did not show acceler-
`ated oxidation out to 500 h at 13008C in 90% H OrO ,
`2
`2
`while a thick oxide scale developed on areas without a
`(cid:14)
`.
`Si surface layer in the same exposure Fig. 10 . Fig. 11
`
`Fig. 7. MulliterBSAS-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor furnace 200 h, 13008C, 2 h cycle, 90% H OrO , 1 atm. .
`.
`(cid:14)
`2
`2
`
`GE-1011.004
`
`

`
`K.N. Lee r Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`)
`(
`
`5
`
`loss due to silica
`showed weight
`Uncoated MI
`volatilization, while EBC-coated MI showed fairly con-
`stant weight, demonstrating its effectiveness in prevent-
`ing the silica volatilization. Fig. 12 shows the cross-sec-
`tion of EPM EBC-coated MI after the HPBR expo-
`sure. Note the excellent durability regardless of the
`presence of Si surface layer in such a short exposure.
`
`3. Summary
`
`A new EBC system, siliconrmullite-based compos-
`iterBSAS, was developed under the HSR-EPM pro-
`gram. Mullite-based composite bond coat and BSAS
`top coat exhibited much improved crack resistance
`compared with mullite and YSZ, respectively, leading
`to dramatically enhanced durability in combustion en-
`vironments. A silicon bond layer further improved the
`EBC durability by providing stronger bonding of the
`
`Fig. 8. Modified mulliterYSZ-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor fur-
`nace 200 h, 13008C, 2 h cycle, 90% H OrO , 1 atm. .
`(cid:14)
`.
`2
`2
`
`shows the plot of weight change vs. time for uncoated
`and EPM EBC-coated MI exposed to HPBR at 12008C.
`
`Fig. 9. Modified mulliterBSAS-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor furnace 200 h, 13008C, 2 h cycle, 90% H OrO , 1 atm. .
`.
`(cid:14)
`2
`2
`
`Fig. 10. Modified mulliterBSAS-coated MI in cyclic water vapor furnace 500 h, 13008C, 2 h cycle, 90% H OrO , 1 atm. .
`.
`(cid:14)
`2
`2
`
`GE-1011.005
`
`

`
`6
`
`K.N. Lee r Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`)
`(
`
`Opila, N. Jacobson and N. Bansal of NASA Glenn
`Research Center, H. Wang, P. Meschter and C. Luthra
`of General Electric Corporate Research & Develop-
`ment Center, and H. Eaton and W. Allen of United
`Technology Research Center.
`
`References
`
`w x1 N.S. Jacobson, Corrosion of silicon-based ceramics in combus-
`(cid:14) . (cid:14)
`.
`1993 3]28.
`tion environments, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 1
`w x2 N.S. Jacobson, J.L. Smialek, D.S. Fox, Molten salt corrosion of
`(cid:14)
`.
`SiC and Si3N4, in: N.S. Cheremisinoff Ed. , Handbook of
`Ceramics and Composites, 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1990,
`pp. 99]135.
`w x3 E.J. Opila, R. Hann, Paralinear oxidation of CVD SiC in water
`(cid:14) . (cid:14)
`.
`1997 197]205.
`vapor, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 1
`w x4 W.J. Lackey, D.P. Stinton, G.A. Cerny, A.C. Schaffhauser, L.L.
`Fehrenbacher, Ceramic coatings for advanced heat engines }
`(cid:14) . (cid:14)
`.
`a review and projection, Adv. Ceram. Mater. 2 1
`1987
`24]30.
`w x5 D.W. Graham, D.P. Stinton, Chemical vapor deposition of
`(cid:14)
`.
`Ta O corrosion resistant coatings,
`in: J. Fairbanks Ed. ,
`2
`5
`Proceedings of the 1992 Coatings for Advanced Heat Engines
`Workshop, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1992,
`pp. IV65]IV71.
`w x6 K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Development and environmental dura-
`bility of mullite and mulliterYSZ dual layer coatings for SiC
`and Si N ceramics, Surf. Coat. Technol. 86r87 1996 142]148.
`(cid:14)
`.
`3
`4
`J.R. Price, M. van Roode, C. Stala, Ceramic oxide-coated
`silicon carbide for high temperature corrosive environments,
`(cid:14)
`.
`Key Eng. Maters. 72]74 1992 71]84.
`w x8
`J.I. Federer, Alumina base coatings for protection of SiC
`(cid:14)
`.
`ceramics, J. Mater. Eng. 12 1990 141]149.
`w x9 K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, N.S. Jacobson, New generation of
`plasma-sprayed mullite coatings on silicon-carbide, J. Am.
`(cid:14) . (cid:14)
`.
`1995 705]710.
`Ceram. Soc. 78 3
`
`w x7
`
`Fig. 11. Weight change of coated and uncoated MI in high-pressure
`burner rig 12008C, 6 atm., equivalence ratios0.78, ¤ s 2000
`(cid:14)
`gas
`cmrs .
`.
`
`coating. Durability out to 1000 h in 2-h thermal cycling
`at 13008C in 90% H OrO and out to 200 h in a high
`2
`2
`pressure burner rig at 12008C has been demonstrated.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`I am grateful to G.W. Leissler of DynacsrNASA
`Glenn for the preparation of plasma spray coatings and
`R.C. Robinson of DynacsrNASA Glenn for high pres-
`sure burner rig tests. I also would like to acknowledge
`HSR-EPM EBC Team Members: J. Smialek, K. Lee, E.
`
`Fig. 12. Modified mulliterBSAS-coated MI in high-pressure burner rig 12008C, 6 atm., equivalence ratios0.78, ¤ s 2000 cmrs .
`.
`(cid:14)
`gas
`
`GE-1011.006
`
`

`
`K.N. Lee r Surface and Coatings Technology 133]134 2000 1]7
`)
`(
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`w x10 K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Oxidation behavior of mullite-coated sic
`and SiCrSiC composites under thermal cycling between room
`(cid:14) .
`temperature and 1200]14008C, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 3
`(cid:14)
`.
`1996 620]626.
`
`w x11 K.N. Lee, N.S. Jacobson, R.A. Miller, Refractory oxide coatings
`(cid:14)
`. (cid:14)
`.
`on SiC ceramics, MRS Bull. 14 10 1994 35]38.
`w x12 K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, N.S. Jacobson, E.J. Opila, Environmen-
`tal durability of mulliterSiC and mulliterYSZ coatingrSiC
`(cid:14)
`.
`Systems, in: J.B. Watchman Ed. , Ceramic Engineering and
`Science Proceedings, The American Ceramic Society, Wester-
`ville, OH, 1995, pp. 1037]1044.
`w x13 K.N. Lee, Key durability issues with mullite-based environmen-
`tal barrier coatings for Si-based ceramics, International Gas
`Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, June 7]10,
`(cid:14)
`.
`Indianapolis, IN, papera T-443, 1999 99]G.
`w x14 K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Durability of mulliterYSZ-coated SiC
`in 90% H OrO , Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites,
`2
`2
`IV, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1999, pp.
`17]25.
`
`
`
`
`
`x
`w
`.
`(cid:14)
`15 K.N. Lee, NASA Glenn Research Center 1994 unpublished.
`
`w x16 K.N. Lee, Contamination effects on interfacial porosity during
`cyclic oxidation of mullite-coated silicon carbide, J. Am. Ceram.
`(cid:14)
`. (cid:14)
`.
`Soc. 81 12 1998 3329]3332.
`
`w x17 K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Modification of mullite-based coatings
`on Si-based ceramics for enhanced durability, Proceedings of
`the Annual HITEMP Review, Turbine Materials-CMCs, vol.
`III, NASA-Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, paper 45,
`1997.
`
`w x18 M.L. Auger, V.K. Sarin, The development of CVD mullite
`coatings for high temperature corrosive applications, Surf. Coat.
`Technol. 94r95 1997 46]52.
`(cid:14)
`.
`J.A. Haynes, K.M. Cooly, D.P. Stinton, R.A. Lowden, W.Y.
`Lee, Corrosion-resistant CVD mullite coatings for Si N , Cer-
`3
`4
`(cid:14) .
`amic Engineering and Science Proceedings, vol. 20 4 , The
`American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1999, pp. 355]362.
`
`
`
`w x19
`
`GE-1011.007

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket