throbber
ENGINEEffiNG LIBRARY
`DISPLAY PEFJONCAL
`Non-ch:culating until:
`3 2000
`
`1
`
`UTC 2022
`General Electric v. United Technologies
`IPR2016-01289
`
`

`

`Abstracting Services
`This journal is cited by the following Abstracting/Indexing Services: Automatic Subject Citation Alert,
`Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Contents-Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences,
`Engineering Index, FIZ Karlsruhe, Metals Abstracts, PASCAL/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique,
`Physics Abstracts, Physikalische Berichte, Science Citation Index.
`
`International Standard Serial Number 0257-8972
`
`© 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All Rights Reserved
`
`This journal and the individual contributions contained in it are protected by the copyright of Elsevier Science S.A., and the following
`terms and conditions apply to their use:
`
`Photocopying
`Single photocopies of single articles may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws. Permission of the Publisher
`and payment of a fee is required for all other photocopying, including multiple or systematic copying, copying for advertising or
`promotional purposes, resale, and all forms of document delivery. Special rates are available for educational institutions that wish to make
`photocopies for non-profit educational classroom use.
`
`Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier Science Global Rights Department, PO Box 800, Oxford OX5 lDX, UK; phone: (+44)
`1865 843830, fax : (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: permissions@elsevier.co.uk. You may also contact Global Rights directly through
`Elsevier's home page (http://www.elsevier.nl), selecting first 'Customer Support' , then 'General Information', then 'Permissions Query
`Form'.
`
`In the USA, users may clear permissions and make payment through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive,
`Danvers, MA 01923, USA; phone: (978) 7508400; fax: (978) 7504744, and in the UK, through the Copyright Licensing Agency Rapid
`Clearance Service (CLARCS), 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WlP OLP, UK; phone: (+44) 1714365931; fax: (+44) 1714363986.
`Other countries may have a local reprographic rights agency for payments.
`
`Derivative Works
`Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within their
`institutions. Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution.
`
`Permission of the Publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations.
`
`Electronic Storage or Usage
`Permission of the Publisher is required to store electronically any material contained in this journal, including any article or part of an
`article. Contact the Publisher at the address indicated.
`
`Except as outlined above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
`means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Publisher
`
`Address permissions requests to: Elsevier Science Global Rights Department, at the mail, fax and e-mail addresses noted above.
`
`Notice
`No responsibility is assumed by the Publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
`negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein.
`Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made.
`
`Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical (medical) standards, inclusion in this publication does not constitute
`a guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of such product or of the claims made of it by its manufacturer.
`
`Advertising information. Advertising orders and enquiries may be sent to: USA, Canada and South America: Mr Tino de Carlo, The
`Advertising Department, Elsevier Science Inc., 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010-5107, USA; phone: ( + 1) (212) 633
`3815; fax : (+l) (2 12) 633 3820; e-mail: t.decarlo @elsevier.com. Japan: The Advertising Department, Elsevier Science K.K., 9-15
`Higashi-Azabu 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0044, Japan; phone (+81 ) (3) 5561 5033; fax: (+81 ) (3) 5561 5047. Europe and ROW:
`Rachel Leveson-Gower, The Advertising Department, Elseiver Science Ltd, The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5
`1GB, UK; phone: (+44) (1865) 843565; fax: (+44) (1865) 843976; e-mail: r.leveson-gower@elsevier.co.uk.
`
`Printed in The Netherlands
`
`8 The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO 239.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
`
`2
`
`

`

`ELSEVIER
`
`Surface and Coatings Technology 133- 134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`SURIA&E
`&GI/Al/NliS
`IICHNOLDGY
`
`www.el sev ier. nl /1 ocate/surf coat
`
`Current status of environmental barrier coatings for Si-Based
`ceramics
`
`K.N. Lee*
`
`Chemical Engineering Department, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA
`
`Abstract
`
`Silicon-based ceramics are the leading candidates for high temperature structural components in next generation gas turbine
`engines. One key drawback of silicon-based ceramics for such an application is volatilization of the protective silica scale in water
`vapor and the resulting rapid ceramic recession. Therefore, the realization of Si-based ceramics components in advanced gas
`turbine engines depends on the development of protection schemes from water vapor attack. Currently, plasma-sprayed external
`environmental barrier coatings (EBCs) are the most promising approach. In the late 1980s and early 1990s a wide range of
`refractory oxide materials were tested as coatings on Si-based ceramics to provide protection from hot corrosion. After the
`discovery of silica volatilization in water vapor in the early 1990s, the focus of EBC development research has been shifted
`towards the protection from water vapor attack. Experience learned form the earlier coating developmental effort provided the
`foundation upon which more complex and advanced EBC coatings have been developed. This paper will discuss the brief history
`and the current status of EBC development for Si-based ceramics with the main focus on water vapor protection. © 2000 Elsevier
`Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Keywords: Environmental barrier coatings; Si-based ceramics; Mullite-based composite bond coat; BSAS
`
`1. Introduction
`
`One key barrier to the application of advanced sili(cid:173)
`con-based ceramics and composites for hot section
`structural components in gas turbines is their lack of
`environmental durability. Silicon-based ceramics ex(cid:173)
`hibit excellent oxidation resistance in clean, dry oxygen,
`by forming a slow-growing, dense silica scale [1]. How(cid:173)
`ever, the normally protective silica scale can be severely
`degraded by reacting with impurities, such as alkali
`salts [2] or water vapor [3]. Oxide coatings are a promis(cid:173)
`ing approach to providing environmental protection for
`advanced heat engine components because oxides are
`in general more resistant than silicon-based ceramics
`to corrosive environments [4].
`
`* Resident Researcher of NASA Glenn Research Centre MS106-l ,
`21000 Brook Park Road, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland,
`OH 44135, USA. Tel.: + 1-216-433-5634; fax: + 1-216-433-5544.
`E-mail address: kang.n.lee@grc.nasa.gov (K.N. Lee).
`
`There are several key issues that must be considered
`in selecting coating materials [5,6]. Fig. 1 schematically
`shows the key issues. Firstly, the coating must possess
`the ability to resist reaction with aggressive environ(cid:173)
`ments, as well as low oxygen permeability to limit the
`transport of oxygen. Secondly, the coating must possess
`a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) close to that
`of the substrate material to prevent delamination or
`cracking due to CTE mis-match stress. Thirdly, the
`coating must maintain a stable phase under thermal
`exposure. Phase transformation typically accompanies
`a volumetric change, disrupting the integrity of the
`coating. Fourthly, the coating must be chemically com(cid:173)
`patible with the substrate to avoid detrimental chemi(cid:173)
`cal interaction.
`Early coatings work focused on protecting silicon(cid:173)
`based ceramics from molten salt corrosion. Mullite has
`attracted interest as a coating for Si-based ceramics
`mainly because of its close CTE match with SiC. Fig. 2
`shows the evolution of mullite and mullite/ refractory
`
`0257-8972/ 00/ $ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PU: SO 2 5 7 - 8 9 7 2 ( 0 0) 0 0 8 8 9 - 6
`
`3
`
`

`

`2
`
`KN. Lee/ Swface and Coatings Technology 133-134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`Environmental Durability
`
`,::::rrlri:' ~:~·~m~e;b;Ji<,
`
`Fig. 1. Key issues in selecting coating materials.
`
`oxide coating systems. Solar Turbines initiated the de(cid:173)
`velopment of plasma-sprayed refractory oxide coatings
`to protect SiC heat exchanger tubes from hot corrosion
`[7]. Single layer mullite coatings showed the best dura(cid:173)
`bility in thermal cycling and in hot corrosion tests.
`However, plasma-sprayed mullite coatings tended to
`develop cracks during thermal exposure. Corrosive
`species penetrated the cracks and attacked the SiC
`substrates. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
`developed an aqueous slurry process to apply refractory
`oxide coatings containing approximately 50-90 wt. %
`alumina [8]. Coatings containing mullite as the major
`phase performed the best, however, all coatings cracked
`
`and delaminated from the SiC during thermal expo(cid:173)
`sure.
`The NASA Glenn group discovered that plasma(cid:173)
`sprayed mullite contained a large amount of amor(cid:173)
`phous mullite due to the rapid cooling rate during
`solidification [9]. The crystallization of amorphous mul(cid:173)
`lite, accompanying a volumetric contraction, was identi(cid:173)
`fied as the primary source of cracking in plasma-sprayed
`mullite coatings (Fig. 3). Subsequently, a modified
`plasma spraying process was developed at NASA Glenn,
`which successfully eliminated most of the amorphous
`mullite
`from
`the coating. The second-generation
`plasma-sprayed mullite coating exhibited dramatically
`improved thermal shock resistance and durability, re(cid:173)
`maining adherent out to 1200 h at temperatures up to
`1300°C in air [6,10] and out to 150 h at 1000°C in a high
`pressure hot corrosion burner rig [11].
`By the mid 1990s, the volatilization of silica in water
`vapor and the resulting rapid recession of silicon-based
`ceramics emerged as a showstopper for the application
`of silicon-based ceramics in combustion environments
`[3], shifting the focus of coatings research to protection
`
`1985
`1990
`1995
`2000
`l~~~~l·~~~-1~~~~11
`
`• Solar Turbines 171
`(M. van Roode et al)
`- mullite
`- mu lli te/Al,0 3, Y20 3, YSZ
`- air plasma spray
`• ORNL (J. I. Federer) )8)
`- mullite (major phase),
`- mullite (maj or phase)
`/Al20 3 (major phase)
`- aqueous slurry
`
`• mullite showed the best
`performance
`• cracked under thennal
`exposure
`
`• NASA Glenn 19-17)
`(K. Lee et al)
`-mulli te
`- mullite/YSZ, cordi eri te
`- modified pl asma spray
`
`• Boston U. 1181
`(V. K. Sarin et al)
`- mu llite
`-CVD
`
`• ORNL )191
`(J . A. Haynes et a l)
`- mullite
`-CVD
`
`• enhanced crack resistance
`(crystalline mullite)
`• develop segmenta l cracks
`
`• excellent crack resistance
`( dense, crystalline)
`• low deposition rate
`
`• HSR-EPM
`(NASA-GE-PW)
`Current State-of-The Art
`- silicon / modified mullite / BSAS
`- modifi ed plasma spray
`
`Fig. 2. Evolution of mullite and mullite/refractory oxide coating systems.
`
`First generation mullite
`
`Second generation mullite
`
`Fig. 3. Comparison of first generation vs. second-generation plasma-sprayed mullite (48 h, 1000°C, 2 h cycle, air).
`
`i
`
`4
`
`

`

`K.N. Lee / Surface and Coatings Technology 133-134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`3
`
`from water vapor. Mullite was found to lose silica
`through volatilization, leaving a porous alumina layer
`on the surface in simulated combustion environments
`(8-µm-thick porous alumina after 50 h at 1230°C, 6
`atm., gas velocity= 2000 cm/ s) [12] (Fig. 4). Therefore,
`an environmental overlay coating was necessary when
`protection from water vapor was needed. NASA Glenn
`selected yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ; Zr0 2-8 wt. %
`Y20 3) as the baseline overlay coating because of its
`proven performance as a thermal barrier coating in
`combustion environments [11]. Despite the large CTE
`of YSZ, the mullite / YSZ-coated SiC showed excellent
`adherence under thermal cycling in air [6] and sup(cid:173)
`pressed silica volatilization in simulated combustion
`environments [13] (Fig. 5). The mullite/ YSZ system,
`however, developed water vapor-enhanced oxidation
`after approximately 100 h at 1300°C. The enhanced
`oxidation was initiated in areas where cracks in the
`mullite intersected the SiC interface, since water vapor
`transported through the cracks and attacked the sub(cid:173)
`strate [14] (Fig. 6). There was evidence of silica
`volatilization at the bottom of cracks (Fig. 6). Water
`vapor, the predominant oxidant in a H 20 / 0 2 environ(cid:173)
`ment, is known to enhance the oxidation of SiC. The
`silica scale formed in high water vapor is porous, al(cid:173)
`lowing the oxidation to propagate readily along the
`interface. The porous scale was attributed to the gener(cid:173)
`ation of gaseous silicon hydroxide species.
`
`2. Development of current state-of-the-art
`environmental barrier coatings (EBCs)
`
`Key durability issues in the mullite-based coating
`system in water vapor include: (i) through-thickness
`cracking in the mullite; (ii) weak bonding of mullite
`onto silicon-based ceramics; and (iii) interface contami(cid:173)
`nation [13]. Through-thickness-cracks provided a path
`
`Porous
`Alumina
`
`Mullite
`
`• •
`
`-1 10 µm
`
`Fig. 4. Mullite in high-pressure burner rig (50 h, 1230°C, 6 atm.,
`equivalence ratio = 1.9, vgas = 2000 cm/ s).
`
`for water vapor to oxidize the substrate, leading to the
`eventual failure of the system. YSZ overlay coating
`failed to seal the cracks in mullite since YSZ also
`cracked due to the large CTE mis-match between the
`two layers. It is believed that the development of
`through-thickness-cracks in mullite is due to stresses in
`the coating [13]. The presence of second phases, such
`as residual amorphous mullite and alumina, in the
`mullite coating and the resulting volumetric shrinkage
`and CTE mis-match are suggested to be the major
`sources for the stresses in the coating. Mullite does not
`form a strong chemical bond with SiC according to a
`diffusion couple study in our lab [15]. Thus, the mul(cid:173)
`lite / SiC bond of as-sprayed coatings is mainly due to
`mechanical interlocking. Interfacial contamination can
`degrade coating durability by altering the physical and
`
`Mullite/YSZ-Coated SiC
`
`Q,j
`
`---
`M e -0
`CJ
`......
`=ii e -1
`,_,
`=ii = -2
`ell -= u
`....
`-= =ii
`-~
`~
`
`-3
`
`-4
`
`-5
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`50
`60
`Time (h)
`
`70
`
`80
`
`90
`
`100
`
`Fig. 5. Mullite and mullite/ YSZ-coated SiC in high-pressure burner rig (1230°C, 6 atm., equivalence ratio = 1.9, vga s = 2000 cm/ s).
`
`5
`
`

`

`4
`
`KN. Lee / Surface and Coatings Technology I 33- 134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`Fig. 6. Mullite and mullite/ YSZ-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor furnace (200 h, 1300°C, 2 h cycle, 90% H 20 / 0 2 , 1 atm.).
`
`200h, l 300°C, 2h cycle
`
`chemical properties of the silica scale, especially growth
`rate, viscosity and porosity [16].
`The crack resistance of mullite coating can be im(cid:173)
`proved by modifying the physical properties of the
`coating or by sealing the cracks with a crack-resistant
`overlay coating [13). A new, mullite-based composite
`bond coat with substantially improved crack resistance
`and a crack-resistant, low silica activity top coat (BSAS:
`Ba0-Sr0-Al 20 3-Si0 2) were developed under the high
`speed research-enabling propulsion materials (HSR(cid:173)
`EPM) program. Today these coatings are referred to as
`EBCs. Replacing the YSZ top coat in the mullite/ YSZ
`system with BSAS delayed the onset of accelerated
`oxidation in water vapor by a factor of at least two (Fig.
`7). Further improvement in durability was achieved by
`replacing the mullite bond coat with the mullite-BSAS
`
`composite bond coat (Fig. 8), while still further im(cid:173)
`in
`the composite bond
`provement was achieved
`coat/ BSAS duplex coating system (EPM EBC) (Fig. 9).
`The improved water vapor durability with the compos(cid:173)
`ite bond coat and the BSAS top coat was attributed to
`the excellent crack resistance of these coatings.
`It has been shown that EBC durability can also be
`enhanced by improving the adherence through the
`modification of the mullite bond coat/SiC interface
`[17-19]. It was discovered in the HSR-EPM program
`that silicon is an excellent bond layer to improve the
`adherence of mullite onto SiC. EPM EEC-coated MI
`covered with a Si surface layer did not show acceler(cid:173)
`ated oxidation out to 500 hat 1300°C in 90% H 20 / 0 2 ,
`while a thick oxide scale developed on areas without a
`Si surface layer in the same exposure (Fig. 10). Fig. 11
`
`(two different areas of the same coupon)
`
`•
`
`., :>· .,.
`. ..
`..,:~
`., -:
`. .... . . ·.:
`' '-iL
`,
`-:..,. __ ;. :.,·~
`···".'· ..
`
`. ' . ..• . . - . . . . .. ~...
`
`,,4 ,
`
`··BS'AS ..
`. ·•
`'· . ., .
`.1.,,/
`.
`. .
`.
`.M ti
`"'
`,
`~ "Quite : . f •·· ·
`. ··
`' _Jo •. _.· -····-= . ···., · ... ~ . .,,,
`... -
`.-·· ...
`...
`... ...
`
`Fig. 7. Mullite/ BSAS-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor furnace (200 h, 1300°C, 2 h cycle, 90% H 20 / 0 2 , 1 atm.).
`
`,•
`
`~ .
`
`.~ .. ·.
`
`, .. '.: . . 1 ··· ,·00µm ·1
`. ,._•
`...
`
`6
`
`

`

`K.N. Lee / Surface and Coatings Technology 133-134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`5
`
`~ . I\
`
`.
`
`• '
`·" .
`- ~~
`- 1' Modlfl

`• ¥.llllite :. • ·.
`
`Coating Side
`)
`
`(Modified Mullite)
`NSZ on RBSN CMC
`(50hr, /30(J'C, Air)
`
`Fig. 8. Modified mullite/ YSZ-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor fur(cid:173)
`nace (200 h, 1300°C, 2 h cycle, 90% H 20 / 0 2 , 1 atm.).
`
`shows the plot of weight change vs. time for uncoated
`and BPM BBC-coated MI exposed to HPBR at 1200°C.
`
`to silica
`loss due
`Uncoated MI showed weight
`volatilization, while BBC-coated MI showed fairly con(cid:173)
`stant weight, demonstrating its effectiveness in prevent(cid:173)
`ing the silica volatilization. Fig. 12 shows the cross-sec(cid:173)
`tion of BPM BBC-coated MI after the HPBR expo(cid:173)
`sure. Note the excellent durability regardless of the
`presence of Si surface layer in such a short exposure.
`
`3. Summary
`
`A new BBC system, silicon/ mullite-based compos(cid:173)
`ite / BSAS, was developed under the HSR-BPM pro(cid:173)
`gram. Mullite-based composite bond coat and BSAS
`top coat exhibited much improved crack resistance
`compared with mullite and YSZ, respectively, leading
`to dramatically enhanced durability in combustion en(cid:173)
`vironments. A silicon bond layer further improved the
`BBC durability by providing stronger bonding of the
`
`M~Jtified
`.Mullite
`
`. . .
`' •
`
`'· .
`
`. .
`
`. . .
`
`Fig. 9. Modified mullite/ BSAS-coated SiC in cyclic water vapor furnace (200 h, 1300°C, 2 h cycle, 90% H 20 / 0 2 , 1 atm.).
`
`~~)
`
`Modified 1
`Mullite
`""\ ,•· ·-"
`
`Fig. 10. Modified mullite/ BSAS-coated MI in cyclic water vapor furnace (500 h, 1300°C, 2 h cycle, 90% H 20 / 0 2 , 1 atm.).
`
`7
`
`

`

`20
`
`0)
`
`E
`
`Q)
`0)
`c: -20
`co
`.c
`U _40
`+.J
`S -60
`
`-80 ~--'----'----~ ............................. .....__,_,'-'-'---'----'----~---'----'---'----'----'....L...L-'-'-~....L..L~
`25
`0
`50
`75
`100 125 150 175 200
`Exposure Time (hrs)
`Fig. 11. Weight change of coated and uncoated MI in high-pressure
`burner rig (1200°C, 6 atm., equivalence ratio= 0.78, ugas = 2000
`cm/ s).
`
`coating. Durability out to 1000 h in 2-h thermal cycling
`at 1300°C in 90% H 20 / 0 2 and out to 200 h in a high
`pressure burner rig at 1200°C has been demonstrated.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`I am grateful to G.W. Leissler of Dynacs/ NASA
`Glenn for the preparation of plasma spray coatings and
`R.C. Robinson of Dynacs/NASA Glenn for high pres(cid:173)
`sure burner rig tests. I also would like to acknowledge
`HSR-EPM EBC Team Members: J. Smialek, K. Lee, E.
`
`6
`
`K.N. Lee / Swface and Coatings Technology 133- 134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`Modified Mullite/BSAS
`
`Mullite/BSAS
`
`Opila, N. Jacobson and N. Bansal of NASA Glenn
`Research Center, H. Wang, P. Meschter and C. Luthra
`of General Electric Corporate Research & Develop(cid:173)
`ment Center, and H. Eaton and W. Allen of United
`Technology Research Center.
`
`References
`
`[1] N.S. Jacobson, Corrosion of silicon-based ceramics in combus(cid:173)
`tion environments, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76 (1) (1993) 3- 28.
`[2] N.S. Jacobson, J.L. Smialek, D.S. Fox, Molten salt corrosion of
`SiC and Si3N4, in: N.S. Cheremisinoff (Ed.), Handbook of
`Ceramics and Composites, 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1990,
`pp. 99-135.
`[3] E.J. Opila, R. Hann, Paralinear oxidation of CVD SiC in water
`vapor, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (1) (1997) 197- 205.
`[4] W.J. Lackey, D.P. Stinton, G.A. Cerny, AC. Schaffhauser, L.L.
`Fehrenbacher, Ceramic coatings for advanced heat engines -
`a review and projection, Adv. Ceram. Mater. 2 (1) (1987)
`24-30.
`[5] D.W. Graham, D.P. Stinton, Chemical vapor deposition of
`Ta 20 5 corrosion resistant coatings, in: J. Fairbanks (Ed.),
`Proceedings of the 1992 Coatings for Advanced Heat Engines
`Workshop, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1992,
`pp. IV65- IV71.
`[6] K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Development and environmental dura(cid:173)
`bility of mullite and mullite/ YSZ dual layer coatings for SiC
`and Si 3 N4 ceramics, Surf. Coat. Technol. 86/ 87 (1996) 142- 148.
`J.R. Price, M. van Roode, C. Stala, Ceramic oxide-coated
`silicon carbide for high temperature corrosive environments,
`Key Eng. Maters. 72- 74 (1992) 71- 84.
`[8] J.I. Federer, Alumina base coatings for protection of SiC
`ceramics, J. Mater. Eng. 12 (1990) 141-149.
`[9] K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, N.S. Jacobson, New generation of
`plasma-sprayed mullite coatings on silicon-carbide, J. Am.
`Ceram. Soc. 78 (3) (1995) 705-710.
`
`[7]
`
`'
`
`1
`
`•
`
`•
`-liiiil
`
`Fig. 12. Modified mullite/BSAS-coated MI in high-pressure burner rig (1200°C, 6 atm., equivalence ratio= 0.78, u8a, = 2000 cm/s).
`
`8
`
`

`

`KN. Lee/ Surface and Coatings Technology 133- 134 (2000) 1- 7
`
`7
`
`[10] K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Oxidation behavior of mullite-coated sic
`and SiC/ SiC composites under thermal cycling between room
`temperature and 1200- 1400°C, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79 (3)
`(1996) 620- 626.
`[11] K.N. Lee, N.S. Jacobson, R.A. Miller, Refractory oxide coatings
`on SiC ceramics, MRS Bull. 14 (10) (1994) 35- 38.
`[12] K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, N.S. Jacobson, E.J. Opila, Environmen(cid:173)
`tal durability of mullite/ SiC and mullite/ YSZ coating/Sic
`Systems, in: J.B. Watchman (Ed.), Ceramic Engineering and
`Science Proceedings, The American Ceramic Society, Wester(cid:173)
`ville, OH, 1995, pp. 1037- 1044.
`[13] K.N. Lee, Key durability issues with mullite-based environmen(cid:173)
`tal barrier coatings for Si-based ceramics, International Gas
`Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, June 7- 10,
`Indianapolis, IN, paper# T-443, (1999) 99- G.
`[14] K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Durability of mullite/ YSZ-coated SiC
`in 90% H 20 / 0 2 , Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites,
`IV, The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1999, pp.
`17- 25.
`
`[15] K.N. Lee, NASA Glenn Research Center (1994) unpublished.
`[16] K.N. Lee, Contamination effects on interfacial porosity during
`cyclic oxidation of mullite-coated silicon carbide, J. Am. Ceram.
`Soc. 81 (12) (1998) 3329- 3332.
`[17] K.N. Lee, R.A. Miller, Modification of mullite-based coatings
`on Si-based ceramics for enhanced durability, Proceedings of
`the Annual HITEMP Review, Turbine Materials-CMCs, vol.
`III, NASA-Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, paper 45,
`1997.
`[18] M.L. Auger, V.K. Sarin, The development of CVD mullite
`coatings for high temperature corrosive applications, Surf. Coat.
`Technol. 94/ 95 (1997) 46-52.
`J.A. Haynes, K.M. Cooly, D.P. Stinton, R.A. Lowden, W.Y.
`Lee, Corrosion-resistant CVD mullite coatings for Si 3N4 , Cer(cid:173)
`amic Engineering and Science Proceedings, vol. 20(4), The
`American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1999, pp. 355-362.
`
`[19]
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket