throbber
PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS • OCTOBER 2000
`
`1
`
`UTC 2020
`General Electric v. United Technologies
`IPR2016-01289
`
`

`

`Journal of
`Engineering for Gas
`Turbines and Pourer
`
`Published Quarterly by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
`
`VOLUME 122 • NUMBER 4 • OCTOBER 2000
`
`556
`
`505 Preface: Special ICE Section
`TECHNICAL PAPERS-SPECIAL ICE SECTION
`Engine Design
`506 Review of Power Cylinder Friction for Diesel Engines
`D. E. Richardson
`520 Predicted Effects of Cylinder Kit Wear on Blowby and Oil Consumption
`for Two Diesel Engines
`D. E. Richardson and S. A. Krause
`526 A Probabilistic Approach to Engine Balance
`Dinu Taraza
`Intake and Exhaust System Dynamics
`533 Validation of a New TVD Scheme Against Measured Pressure Waves in
`the Inlet and Exhaust System of a Single Cylinder Engine
`M. Vandevoorde, R. Sierens, and E. Dick
`541 Comparison of Algorithms for Unsteady Flow Calculations in Inlet and
`Exhaust Systems of IC Engines
`M. Vandevoorde, J. Vierendeels, R. Sierens, E. Dick, and R. Baert
`549 Two-Dimensional Simulation of Wave Propagation in a Three-Pipe
`Junction
`R. J. Pearson, M. D. Bassett, P. Batten, and D. E. Winterbone
`Influence of the Exhaust System Design on Scavenging Characteristic
`and Emissions of a Four-Cylinder Supercharged Engine
`Ferdinand Trenc, Francisek Bizjan, Brane Sirok, and Ales Hribernik
`562 Performance Simulation of Sequentially Turbocharged Marine Diesel
`Engines With Applications to Compressor Surge
`Pascal Chesse, Jean-Franfois Hetet, Xavier Tauzia, Philippe Roy,
`and Bahadir lnozu
`In-Cylinder Processes
`570
`Intake Flow Structure and Swirl Generation in a Four-Valve Heavy-Duty
`Diesel Engine
`Kern Y. Kang and Rolf D. Reitz
`579 The Separation Between Turbulence and Mean Flow in ICE LDV Data: The
`Complementary Point-of-View of Different Investigation Tools
`Mario Amelio, Sergio Bova, and Carmine De Bartolo
`588 Comparisons of Diesel Spray Liquid Penetration and Vapor Fuel
`Distributions With In-Cylinder Optical Measurements
`Laura M. Ricart, Rolf D. Reitz, and John E. Dec
`596 Relationship Between Visible Spray Observations and DI Diesel Engine
`Performance
`Takashi Watanabe, Susumu Daidoji, and Keshav S. Varde
`Alternative Fuels Combustion and Emissions
`603 Formaldehyde Formation in Large Bore Natural Gas Engines Part 1:
`Formation Mechanisms
`Charles E. Mitchell and Daniel 8. Olsen
`
`(Contents continued on inside back cover)
`
`This journal is printed on acid-free paper, which exceeds the ANSI 239.48-
`1992 specification for permanence of paper and library materials. @?"'
`@ 85% recycled content, including 10% post-consumer fibers.
`
`2
`
`

`

`In recent years, the ever-increasing socioeconomic pressures for developing cleaner and more efficient means for
`converting chemical fuel energy into useful mechanical work have resulted in a dramatic growth in internal
`combustion engine research and development activities. As a natural outcome of this vigorous activity, a large
`number of technical papers dealing with various mechanical aspects of engine design, as well as with the basic
`thermo-fluid engine processes have been presented at the Fall and Spring Technical Conferences organized by the
`Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) Division of ASME. In 1999, the ICE Division has renewed its commitment to
`identify quality papers of long-term reference value for the journal. Therefore, a major section of this issue of the
`ASME JOURNAL FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER is devoted to a selection of the highest quality ICE
`Papers presented at those meetings, and other papers of long-term reference value which were submitted directly to
`the journal. The contributions of the ICE Division Associates, the support of the ICE Executive Committee, and the
`ASME Editorial Staff, and above all the contributions of the authors and referees are gratefully acknowledged.
`The papers that have been included in the special ICE section of this volume have been arranged in four topical
`areas: engine design, intake and exhaust system dynamics, in-cylinder processes, and alternative fuels combustion
`and emissions. As a special note, the lead paper for the ICE section, authored by Dan E. Richardson and entitled
`''Review of Power Cylinder Friction for Diesel Engines,'' was presented at the 1999 Spring Technical Conference,
`Columbus, Indiana. This paper was selected as the most valuable technical paper presented at an ASME-ICE
`Division Meeting during 1999.
`
`Dennis N. Assanis
`Associate Editor
`ICE Division
`
`Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
`Copyright © 2000 by ASME
`
`OCTOBER 2000, Vol. 122 / 505
`
`3
`
`

`

`Kang N. Lee1
`Chemical Engineering Department,
`Cleveland State University,
`Cleveland, OH 44115
`
`Key Durability Issues With
`Mullite-Based Environmental
`Barrier Coatings for Si-Based
`Ceramics
`
`Plasma-sprayed mullite (3 A 120 3 • 2 S iO 2) and mu:l~te!yttria-stabilize1-zirconia (:SZ)
`dual layer coatings have been developed to protect szlzcon-based ~e_ran:,zcs.Jrom envzro~(cid:173)
`mental attack. Mullite-based coating systems show excellent durability zn azr. However, m
`combustion environments, corrosive species such as molten salt or water vapor penetrate
`through cracks in the coating and attack the Si-based ceramics ~long th~ interface. Thus
`the modification of the coating system for enhanced crack-reszstan~e. zs _necess~ry for
`long-term durability in combustion environments. Q_ther key d~rabzlzty zs~ue~ include
`interfacial contamination and coating/substrate bonding. lnterfaczal contammatzon leads
`to enhanced oxidation and interfacial pore formation, while a weak coating/substrate
`bonding leads to rapid attack of the interface by corrosive species, both of which can
`cause a premature failure of the coating. Interfacial contamination can be minimized by
`limiting impurities in coating and substrate materials. The interface may be modified to
`improve the coating/substrate bond. [S0742-4795(00)03203-8]
`
`Introduction
`Silicon-based ceramics are promising candidates for hot section
`structural components of heat engines and heat exchanger tubes
`for industrial furnaces. One potential barrier to such applications
`is their environmental durability. The excellent oxidation resis(cid:173)
`tance of silicon-based ceramics at high temperatures in clean, dry
`oxygen is due to the formation of a solid, protective external silica
`scale. However, the normally protective silica scale can be de(cid:173)
`graded by reacting with impurities, such as alkali salts [1,2] or
`water vapor [3-5].
`Molten Na2S04 can deposit in gas turbine engines operating
`near marine environments or from contaminants in the fuel [ 6].
`The Na2S04 then reacts with the silica to form liquid sodium
`silicate, leading to accelerated degradation of Si-based ceramics
`[1]. In coal-fired combustion environments, combustion gases
`contain low levels of alkali salts because of naturally occurring
`minor alkali components in the coal. These alkali salts can dis(cid:173)
`solve in the silica scale and enhance the transport of oxygen,
`leading to drastically enhanced oxidation [2]. In heat engines, sub(cid:173)
`stantial amounts of water vapor, typically about 10 percent, is
`produced from burning hydrocarbon fuels in air [7]. The water
`vapor reacts with silica, forming gaseous hydroxide species, such
`as Si(OH) 4 [3-5]. In high-pressure combustion environments, the
`higher water vapor pressure generates even higher levels of gas(cid:173)
`eous hydroxide species, resulting in linear volatilization of silica.
`The linear volatilization of silica coupled with the parabolic oxi(cid:173)
`dation of Si-based ceramics results in overall paralinear kinetics
`[ 4], causing rapid degradation of Si-based ceramics. Therefore,
`the realization of the full potential of silicon-based ceramics in
`high temperature structural applications depends on the develop(cid:173)
`ment of environmental protection schemes.
`An external environmental barrier coating is a promising ap-
`
`1Resident Research Associate at NASA Glenn Research Center.
`Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of THE AMERICAN
`SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS for publication in the ASME JOURNAL OF
`ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Paper presented at the Interna(cid:173)
`tional Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Indianapolis, IN, June
`7-10, 1999; ASME Paper 99-GT-443. Manuscript received by !GT! March 9, 1999;
`final revision received by the ASME Headquarters May 15, 2000. Associate Tech(cid:173)
`nical Editor: D. Wisler.
`
`proach to protect Si-based ceramics from environmental attack.
`Mullite is a promising candidate coating material because of its
`close coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) match and good
`chemical compatibility with Si-based ceramics. Researchers at So(cid:173)
`lar Turbines, Inc., San Diego, CA, and Oak Ridge National Labo(cid:173)
`ratory, Oak Ridge, TN, have done pioneering work on applying
`refractory oxide coatings such as alumina, zirconia, yttria, mullite,
`cordierite, etc., on SiC [8,9]. In those studies, mullite was found to
`be adherent and offer the best protection of all the refractory coat(cid:173)
`ings tested. However, those plasma-sprayed mullite coatings
`tended to crack on thermal cycling. Researchers at NASA Glenn
`Research Center, Cleveland, OH, identified the crystallization of
`amorphous phase mullite, which accompanies a volumetric con(cid:173)
`traction, as the main source for the cracking of plasma-sprayed
`mullite coatings [10]. Based on this finding, researchers at NASA
`GRC successfully eliminated most of the amorphous phase mul(cid:173)
`lite from the coating by spraying the mullite while heating the SiC
`substrate above the crystallization temperature of amorphous mul(cid:173)
`lite (-1000 °C) [10].
`These second-generation mullite coatings provide excellent
`protection in air and molten salt environment [10-14]. Mullite
`coatings, however, suffer selective vaporization of silica in the
`presence of water vapor because of its high silica activity
`(0.3-0.4) [11,15,16]. Thus, an environmental overlay coating is
`required when protection from water vapor is needed. Yttria(cid:173)
`stabilized zirconia (YSZ) was selected as a baseline overlay coat(cid:173)
`ing because of its proven performance as a thermal barrier coating
`(TBC) in combustion environments. The mullite coating in the
`mullite/YSZ coating system is somewhat analogous to the bond
`coat in conventional TBC's, in the sense that it provides bonding
`as well as oxidation protection. This paper will discuss the current
`durability issues of second generation mullite-based environmen(cid:173)
`tal coatings on Si-based ceramics and future research directions in
`this area.
`
`Experimental
`Mullite and YSZ coatings were applied by atmospheric pres(cid:173)
`sure plasma spraying onto 2.5X0.6X0.15 cm sintered a-SiC cou(cid:173)
`pons (Hexoloy™, Carborundum, Niagara Falls, NY) and reaction
`bonded silicon nitride (RBSN R. Bhatt, NASA GRC). The SiC
`
`632 / Vol. 122, OCTOBER 2000
`
`Copyright © 2000 by ASME
`
`Transactions of the ASME
`
`4
`
`

`

`substrates were roughened (Ra 2 =5-6 µm) by etching in Na2C03
`to achieve a good mechanical bond [10], whereas RBSN was used
`as processed. Fused mullite powder with the particle size of
`44-74 µm was used (Cerac, Inc., Milwaukee, WI). Typical coat(cid:173)
`ing thickness was 100-200 µm for the mullite coating and 50 µm
`for the YSZ coating. Details of the coating parameters are de(cid:173)
`scribed elsewhere [IO].
`Coated coupons were annealed in air at 1300 °C for 100 h, prior
`to the environmental exposure. Environmental exposures were
`thermal cycling in air, thermal cycling in 90 percent H20/02 at 1
`atm (simulated lean combustion environments) or isothermal ex(cid:173)
`posure in high-pressure burner rigs with or without molten salt.
`Thermal cycling tests in water vapor were to evaluate the long(cid:173)
`term behavior of coatings in lean combustion environments be(cid:173)
`cause high-pressure burner rigs are not suitable for long-term tests
`due to their high operating cost. Thermal cycling was performed
`using an automated thermal cycling furnace. Each thermal cycle
`consisted of 2 h at temperature, rapid cooling to room tempera(cid:173)
`ture, and 20 min at room temperature. Typically, samples reached
`the high temperature within 2 min and the low temperature within
`5 min in each cycle. Molten salt environments were generated
`using a high-pressure burner rig with Jet A fuel containing 2 ppm
`Na at 4 atm.
`Tested samples were mounted in epoxy, polished to 1 µmusing
`diamond suspension, and examined using Scanning Electron Mi(cid:173)
`croscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS).
`
`Environmental Durability
`
`Air. Mullite/YSZ-coated SiC was exposed to a 2 h thermal
`cycling exposure in air at 1300 °C. Figure 1 shows the cross(cid:173)
`section after 500h exposure. Mullite coatings typically developed
`through-thickness cracks, however, they maintained excellent ad(cid:173)
`hesion and provided excellent oxidation protection. Mullite(cid:173)
`coated SiC exhibited a similar behavior under the same exposure,
`indicating that the presence of YSZ overlay coating did not affect
`the coating durability despite the large CTE mismatch between
`the two layers.
`Mullite/YSZ-coated RBSN was exposed to an isothermal oxi(cid:173)
`dation at 1300 °C in air for 50 h. A thick oxide scale and large
`pores developed at the mullite/RBSN interface (Fig. 2). EDS
`showed a significant amount of Mg in the scale. This contamina(cid:173)
`tion by MgO, which is from the RBSN, is responsible for the
`enhanced oxidation and pore formation. Similar enhanced oxida(cid:173)
`tion and pore formation of mullite-coated SiC was observed when
`the system was contaminated by Na20 or K20 from the coating
`processed with a low purity mullite powder [17]. Alkali and alka(cid:173)
`line earth metal oxides are known to degrade the oxidation resis-
`
`2 Average distance from the roughness profile to the mean line
`
`Fig. 2 Mullite/YSZ-coated RBSN after 50 hat 1300 °c in air
`
`tance of Si-based ceramics by enhancing the oxygen transport
`through silica by altering the silica network [18].
`
`Combustion Environments
`
`High Pressure Burner Rig. Uncoated, mullite-coated, and
`mullite/YSZ-coated SiC was exposed to high-pressure burner rig
`(HPBR) under a rich burn condition (equivalence ratio= 1.9) at 6
`atm and 1230 °C. Figure 3 shows the plot of weight change vs.
`time. Uncoated and mullite-coated SiC showed weight loss due to
`the volatilization of silica. The lack of weight change in the
`mullite/YSZ-coated SiC indicated that the YSZ overlay coating
`provided the protection from water vapor. Figure 4(a) shows the
`cross-section of mullite-coated SiC after the high-pressure burner
`rig exposure. Pores are observed at the interface where cracks
`intersected the SiC interface. Enhanced oxidation was observed
`around pores, indicating that water vapor penetrated through the
`cracks and reacted with SiC. The pore formation is attributed to
`the generation of gaseous silicon hydroxide species. The selective
`volatilization of silica from mullite left a porous layer of alumina
`on the surface of mullite (Fig; 4(b)).
`
`Water Vapor Cyclic Furnace. Mullite-coated SiC/SiC (Du(cid:173)
`pont Lanxide, Newark, DE) exposed to 2 h cycle exposure in 50
`percent H20/02 at 1300 °C showed weight loss, whereas mullite/
`YSZ-coated SiC/SiC exhibited parabolic oxidation [19]. The
`weight loss of mullite-coated SiC/SiC was attributed to the selec(cid:173)
`tive volatilization of silica from the mullite. This result is consis(cid:173)
`tent with the weight change behavior of mullite and mullite/YSZ
`coatings in high pressure burner rig (Fig. 3). A similar weight
`
`UicoatedSiC
`
`I
`
`lime (h)
`
`Fig. 1 Mullite/YSZ-coated SiC after 500 h with 2 h cycles at
`1300 °C in air
`
`Fig. 3 Weight change versus time for coated and uncoated
`SiC in HPBR (6 atm, 1230 °C)
`
`Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
`
`OCTOBER 2000, Vol. 122 / 633
`
`5
`
`

`

`Fig. 4 Mullite-coated SiC after 50 h in HPBR (6 atm, 1230 °C)
`
`change behavior is expected for these coatings on sintered SiC in
`water vapor cyclic furnace because the reaction at the surface
`should not be affected by the type of substrates.
`Mullite/YSZ-coated SiC was exposed to 2 h cycle exposure in
`90 percent H20/02 at 1300 °C to evaluate the long-term durability
`in lean combustion environments. Most interfacial areas showed
`excellent adherence with limited oxidation after 100 h. However,
`at some interfacial areas, where through-thickness-cracks inter(cid:173)
`sected the SiC interface, accelerated oxidation initiated (Fig.
`5(a)). After 200 h, accelerated oxidation propagated along the
`entire mullite/SiC interface, forming a thick porous silica scale
`(Fig. 5(b)). Water vapor, the predominant oxidant in a H20/02
`environment, is known to enhance the oxidation of SiC. The silica
`scale formed in high water vapor is porous, allowing the oxidation
`to propagate readily along the interface. The porous scale is at-
`
`tributed to the generation of gaseous silicon hydroxide species.
`This is in contrast to the scale formed in dry air where the scale is
`dense and thus prevents the rapid propagation of oxidation.
`The effect of preoxidation on the coating adherence was evalu(cid:173)
`ated by preoxidizing a SiC coupon at 1300 °C for 100 h in air,
`prior to the application of mullite/YSZ coating. The coated cou(cid:173)
`pon was exposed to 90 percent H20/02 at 1250 °C with 2 h
`cycles. The cross-section after 100 h showed that the entire inter(cid:173)
`face was attacked by water vapor, forming a thick porous silica
`scale (Fig. 6). It is believed that the silica scale from preoxidation
`weakened the mullite/SiC bonding, leading to more rapid penetra(cid:173)
`tion by water vapor than in the coupon without preoxidation. Pre(cid:173)
`oxidation did not affect the durability of the system when exposed
`in air.
`
`Fig. 5 Mullite/YSZ-coated SiC exposed to 2 h cycle exposure
`in 90 percent H20/02 at 1300 °C; (a) 100 h; (b) 200 h.
`
`Fig. 6 Mullite/YSZ-coated SiC after 100 h with 2 h cycles in 90
`percent H20/02 at 1250 °C. The SiC coupon was oxidized for
`100 h in air at 1300 °C prior to the application of coating.
`
`634 I Vol. 122, OCTOBER 2000
`
`Transactions of the ASME
`
`20µm
`
`6
`
`

`

`Fig. 7 Mullite-coated SiC coupon after 50 h in hot corrosion rig at 1000 °c
`
`Hot Corrosion Rig. Uncoated and mullite-coated SiC coupons
`were exposed in a hot corrosion burner rig at 1000 °C for 50 h.
`Prior to the hot corrosion exposure, the coated coupon underwent
`600 one hour thermal cycles at 1200 °C in air to let cracks form.
`Uncoated SiC was severely deformed due to the attack by the
`molten salt, whereas mullite-coated SiC was well preserved (Fig.
`7(a)). Cross-section of the mullite-coated SiC showed that
`mullite/SiC interface was fairly intact (Fig. 7(b)). Only a limited
`attack with glassy reaction products, presumably sodium silicates,
`was observed at the interface where cracks intersected the SiC
`interface (Fig. 7(d)). This is an indication of the penetration of salt
`through some cracks.
`
`Key Issues
`Several key durability issues are identified from the environ(cid:173)
`mental durability test results. They include through-thickness(cid:173)
`cracking, bonding of mullite to the Si-based ceramic, and inter(cid:173)
`face contamination. These key issues will be discussed in this
`section to help elucidate the future research directions to improve
`the coating durability.
`
`Through-Thickness-Cracking. As-sprayed mullite coatings
`are free of macrocracks (crack width > 1 µm). However, on ther(cid:173)
`mal exposure, they develop macrocracks, the size of which can be
`as wide as 5-10 µm. It has been shown in the foregoing section
`that corrosive species, such as molten salt or water vapor, can
`penetrate through these cracks and attack the SiC, leading to ac(cid:173)
`celerated degradation of the system.
`It is believed that the development of through-thickness-cracks
`is due to stresses in the coating. The most likely source for
`stresses is the precipitation of various second phases in the mullite
`coating. Amorphous phase mullite precipitates in the coating due
`to the rapid cooling of molten mullite [10]. Even in the second
`generation mullite coating, it is likely that some residual amor(cid:173)
`phous phase mullite still remains in the coating. Volumetric
`shrinkage results during the crystallization of the residual amor(cid:173)
`phous phase mullite in subsequent thermal exposures. A signifi(cid:173)
`cant amount of alumina also precipitates in the plasma-sprayed
`mullite coating [10]. Plasma-sprayed alumina typically contains
`substantial amount of metastable alumina phases such as
`y-alumina [20]. Volumetric shrinkage results when the metastable
`alumina phases transform to stable a-alumina in subsequent ther(cid:173)
`mal exposures. The precipitation of alumina phase is also accom(cid:173)
`panied by the precipitation of silica-rich phases to maintain the
`chemical balance [10]. Both the alumina and silica-rich phases
`cause CTE mismatch stresses. Thus the precipitation of second
`phases in the mullite coating and the resulting volumetric shrink(cid:173)
`age and CTE mismatch are suggested to be the major sources for
`the stresses in the coating.
`
`Mullite/Substrate Bond. Mullite does not form a strong
`chemical bond with SiC according to our diffusion couple study
`[21]. Thus the mullite/SiC bond of as-sprayed coatings is mainly
`due to mechanical interlocking. The lack of chemical bond may
`be why the oxidation propagates readily along the interface in
`water vapor. Silica scale from preoxidation presumably further
`weakens the interfacial bond, leading to more rapid attack by the
`water vapor.
`
`Contamination.
`Interfacial contamination can degrade the
`coating durability by altering the physical or chemical properties
`of silica scale. Contaminants, such as alkali or alkaline earth metal
`oxides, are known to be most detrimental to the oxidation resis(cid:173)
`tance of Si-based ceramics [7]. They enhance the oxygen transport
`through silica by altering the silica network [18]. They also reduce
`the scale viscosity by forming silicates [22]. Pores develop at the
`interface when gases generated as a result of oxidation bubble
`through the low viscosity silica scale [17]. High interfacial poros(cid:173)
`ity can eventually lead to coating delamination. Contamination
`from coating materials can be minimized by using high purity
`mullite powder or by limiting the addition of alkali or alkaline
`earth metal oxides in the processing of Si-based ceramics [17].
`
`Future Research Directions
`
`Modification of Mullite Coating for Improved Crack Resis(cid:173)
`tance. Second phases that cause cracking may be reduced
`through process optimization. However, it may be impossible to
`completely eliminate all second phases. For example, melt grown
`mullite is always alumina-rich and thus some silica-rich phases
`will always be present to maintain the chemical balance [23,24].
`The free alumina phase is likely due to the incongruent melting of
`mullite and thus may not be completely eliminated by process
`optimization. Other approaches to improve the crack resistance
`include modifying the physical properties of mullite coating or
`sealing the cracks by applying an overlay coating with good crack
`resistance. Figure 8 shows mullite/cordierite-coated SiC after 600
`h with 20 h cycles at 1200 °C in air. Note that the crack stopped
`at
`the cordierite/mullite interface. Plasma-sprayed cordierite
`seems to be more resistant to cracking than plasma-sprayed
`mullite:
`
`Interface Modification for Improved Bonding. The mullite/
`Si-based ceramic interface may be modified to enhance the
`coating/substrate bonding. One example is Mo flash layer. A Mo
`flash layer (1-5 µm) was applied on SiC by sputtering and an(cid:173)
`nealed in Ar-5 percent H2 at 1200-1300 °C for 20- lOOh, prior to
`the application of mullite/YSZ coating. Silicon diffused into the
`molybdenum during the annealing, forming molybdenum silicide
`with varying composition through the thickness [16]. Similar re(cid:173)
`sults were reported in a Mo/SiC diffusion couple study [25,26].
`
`Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
`
`OCTOBER 2000, Vol. 122 / 635
`
`7
`
`

`

`grateful to G.W. Leissler (Dynacs, NASA Glenn Group) for the
`preparation of plasma-sprayed coatings, M. D. Cuy (Dynacs,
`NASA Glenn Group) for the hot corrosion test, R. C. Robinson
`(Dynacs, NASA Glenn Group) for the HPBR test, and R. Bhatt
`(Army) for the supply of RBSN coupons
`
`References
`[l] Jacobson, N. S., Smialek, I. L., and Fox, D.S., 1990, "Molten Salt Corrosion
`of SiC and Si3N4 ," in Handbook of Ceramics and Composites, Vol. 1, Cher(cid:173)
`emisinoff, N. S., ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 99-135.
`[2] Pareek, V., and Shores, D. A., 1993, "Oxidation of Silicon Carbide in Envi(cid:173)
`ronments Containing Potassium Salt Vapor," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74, No. 3,
`pp. 556-563.
`[3] Hashimoto, A., 1992, "The Effect of H,O Gas on Volatilities of Planet(cid:173)
`Forming Major Elements: I-Experimental Determination of Thermodynamic
`Properties of Ca-, Al-, and Si-hydroxide Gas Molecules and Its Application to
`the Solar Nebula," Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 56, pp. 511-532.
`[4] Opila, E. J., and Hann, R., 1997, "Paralinear Oxidation of CVD SiC in Water
`Vapor," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 80, No. 1, pp. 197-205.
`[5] Opila, E. J., Fox, D. S., and Jacobson, N. S., 1997, "Mass Spectrometric
`Identification of Si(OH) 4 from the Reaction of Silica and Water Vapor," J.
`Am. Ceram. Soc., 80, No. 4, pp 1009-1012.
`[6] Pettit, F. S., and Giggins, C. S., 1987, Superalloys II, C. T. Sims, N. S. Stoloff,
`and W. C. Hage, eds., Wiley, New York, p. 327.
`[7] Jacobson, N. S., 1993, "Corrosion of Silicon-Based Ceramics in Combustion
`Environments," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76, No. l, pp. 3-28.
`[8] Price, J. R., van Roode, M., and Stala, C., 1992, "Ceramic Oxide-Coated
`Silicon Carbide for High-Temperature Corrosive Environments," Key Eng.
`Mater., 72-74, pp. 71-84.
`[9] Federer, J. I., 1990, "Alumina Base Coatings for Protection of SiC Ceram(cid:173)
`ics," J. Mater. Eng.,.12, No. 2, pp. 141-149.
`[JO] Lee, K. N., Miller, R. A., and Jacobson, N. S., 1995, "New Generation of
`Plasma-Sprayed Mullite Coatings on Silicon-Carbide," J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,
`78, No. 3, pp:705-710.
`[11] Lee, K. N., Jacobson, N. S., and Miller, R. A., 1994, "Refractory Oxide
`Coatings on SiC Ceramics," MRS Bull., XIX, No. 10, pp. 35-38.
`[12] Lee, K. N., and Miller, R. A., 1996, "Oxidation Behavior of Mullite-Coated
`SiC and SiC/SiC Composites Under Thermal Cycling between Room Tem(cid:173)
`perature and 1200-1400 °C," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79, No. 3, pp. 620-626.
`[13] Lee, K. N., and Miller, R. A., 1996, "Development and Environmental Dura(cid:173)
`bility of Mullite and Mullite/YSZ Dual Layer Coatings for SiC and Si3N4
`Ceramics," Surf. Coat. Technol., 86-87, pp. 142-148.
`[14] Jacobson, N. S., Lee, K. N., and Yoshio, T. Y., 1996, "Corrosion of Mullite
`By Molten Salts," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79, No. 8, pp. 2161-2167.
`[15] Lee, K. N., Miller, R. A., Jacobson, N. S., and Opila, E. J., 1995, "Environ(cid:173)
`mental Durability of Mul!ite Coating/Sic and Mullite-YSZ Coating/SiC Sys(cid:173)
`tems," Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., September-October, pp. 1037-1044.
`[16] Lee, K. N., and Miller, R. A., 2000, "Durability of Mullite/YSZ-Coated SiC in
`90 percent H20/02 ," Adv. Ceram. Matrix Compos., IV, pp. 17-25.
`[17] Lee, K. N., 1998, "Contamination Effects on Interfacial Porosity During Cy(cid:173)
`clic Oxidation of Mullite-Coated SiC," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81, No. 12, pp.
`3329-3339.
`[18] Lamkin, M.A., Riley, F. L., and Fordham, R. L., 1992, "Oxygen Mobility in
`Silicon Dioxide and Silicate Glasses," J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., IO, pp. 347-367.
`[19] Lee, K. N., and Miller, R. A., 1997, "Modification of Mullite-Based Coatings
`on Si-Based Ceramics for Enhanced Durability," H/TEMP Review, III, NASA
`Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, p. 45.
`[20] Heintz, G. N., and Uematsu, U., 1992, "Preparation and Structures of Plasma(cid:173)
`Sprayed y and a-alumina Coatings," Surf. Coat. Technol., SO, pp. 213-222.
`[21] Lee, K. N., 1998, NASA Glenn Research Center, unpublished research.
`[22] Holloway, D. G., 1973, The Physical Properties of Glass, Wykeham Publica(cid:173)
`tions, London, U.K.
`[23] Aksay, I. A., and Pask, J. A., 1975, "Stable and Metastable Equilibria in the
`System Si0rA1203 ," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 58, Nos. 11-12, pp. 507-512.
`[24] Kriven, W. M., and Pask, J. A., 1983, "Solid Solution Range and Microstruc(cid:173)
`ture of Melt-Grown Mullite," J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 66, No. 9, pp. 649-654.
`[25] Martinelli, A. E., and Drew, R. A. L., 1995, "Microstructure Development
`During Diffusion Bonding of a-Silicon Carbide to Molybdenum," Mater. Sci.
`Eng., A, 191, pp. 239-247.
`[26] Martinelli, A. E., Drew, R. A. L., and Berriche, R., 1996, "Correlation Be(cid:173)
`tween the Strength of SiC-Mo Diffusion Couples and the Mechanical Proper(cid:173)
`ties of the Interfacial Reaction Products," J. Mater. Sci. Lett., IS, pp. 307-
`310.
`
`Fig. 8 Mullite/Cordierite-coated SiC after 600 h with 20 h
`cycles at 1200 °C in air
`
`Fig. 9 Mullite/Mo Silicide/YSZ-coated SiC after 500 h with 2 h
`cycles at 1300 °C in 90 percent H20/02
`
`The annealed flash layer was thicker and partially delaminated,
`presumably due to the volume expansion as the silicon diffused
`into the molybdenum. Figure 9 shows the mullite/molybdenum
`silicide/Sic system after 500 h at 1300 °C with 2 h cycles in 90
`percent H20/02 . Excellent durability was observed at some areas
`of the coating where the molybdenum silicide layer remained in(cid:173)
`tact. Even the silica scale at the interface attacked by water vapor
`was thinner than the scale at the unmodified interface, indicating
`that the interfacial modification delayed the water vapor attack.
`This result suggests the potential of interface modification for im(cid:173)
`proving the coating durabi)ity.
`
`Conclusions
`A mullite-based coating system is promising as an environmen(cid:173)
`tal barrier for Si-based ceramics in combustion environments. Key
`durability issues are through-thickness cracking in the mullite
`coating, a _weak mullite/Si-based ceramic bond, and interfacial
`contamination. Improvement of the crack resistance through the
`,F modification of mullite or the application of an overlay coating is
`suggested. Improved bonding may be achieved through the modi(cid:173)
`fication of interface. Interfacial contamination can be minimized
`by limiting impurities in coating and substrate materials.
`
`Acknowledgments
`The author would like to thank R.A. Miller (NASA-Glenn Re(cid:173)
`search Center) for many helpful discussions. The author is also
`
`636 I Vol. 122, OCTOBER 2000
`
`Transactions of the ASME
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket