throbber
Twenty-Two Years of Phase III Trials for Patients With
`Advanced Non—Small—Cell Lung Cancer: Sobering Results
`
`By Oscar S. Breathnach, Boris Freidlin, Barbara Conley, Mark R. Green, David H. Johnson, David R. Ganclara,
`Michael O'Connell, Frances A, Shepherd, and Bruce E. Johnson
`
`fig-pgg: To determine the changes in clinical trials
`and outcomes of patients with advanced-stage non-
`small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated on phase III ran-
`domized trials initiated in North America from ‘I973 to
`‘I 994.
`
`fgt_it_eg_§___a:_1_d' Methods: Phase III trials for patients
`with advanced-stage NSCLC were identified through a
`search of the National Cancer lnstitute’s Cancer Ther-
`apy Evaluation Program database from 1973 to 1994,
`contact with Cooperative Groups, and by literature
`search of MEDLINE. Patients with advanced NSCLC
`
`treated during a similar time interval were also exam-
`ined in the SEER database. Trends were tested in the
`number of trials, in the number and sex of patients
`entered on the trials, and in survival over time.
`Results: Thirty-three phase III trials were initiated
`between 1973 and ‘I994. Twenty-tour trials (73%)
`were initiated within the first half of this period (‘I 973 to
`
`YSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAPY for patients with ad-
`vanced—stage non—small—cell
`lung cancer
`tNSCLC)
`prolongs survival and palliates symptoms compared with
`best supportive care alone.1'2 Meta-analysis of patients with
`advanced NSCLC who were treated with cisplatin-based
`therapy shows a modest improvement in survival.‘ Despite
`systemic chemotherapy,
`lung cancer remains the greatest
`cause of cancer-related mortality within the United Suites.3
`The 5-year survival of patients with advanced-stage NSCLC
`is less than 5%.
`
`From the Lowe Center fix‘ Thoracic Oiicology, Department of/lditlt
`Oncology, Dana-Farber Ccmcer lnrtitrite. and Departmeirls of Medi-
`cine. Brigliam arid Women's Hospital arid Hur'vard A/Iedicul Sc/tool.
`Boston, MA; Biometric Research Branch. Clinical Investigations
`Branch. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer
`Treaimem and Diagnosis. National Cancer Institute, Betliesda, It/AD;
`Cancer and Lxziikemia Group B. CIiicago. IL: Easterii Cooperative
`Oncologv Group. Pittsbwgli. PA.’ Southwest Oncology Group. San
`Antonio, TX: Nortli Central Cancer Treatment Group Philadelpliia.
`PA; and National Cancer Iristitiite M Caricida Clinical Trials Group.
`Kingslart. Ontario, Canada.
`Submitted June 30, 2000; accepted November 20, 2000.
`Address reprint requests to Oscar S. Breatlmacli, MD, Thoracic
`Oncology Program, Di7m'i—F'nrbei‘ Cancer Insriiitte. Ste I234, 44
`Biriney St, Boston, }v!A 02115.
`© 2001 by/lmerican Society ofClinical Oncology.
`0732-183 '/(}.l/1906-173-i’
`
`1983) and accounted for 5,359 (64‘'/.) of the 8,434
`eligible patients. The median number of patients
`treated per arm of the trials rose from 77 (I973 to
`1933) to 121 (1984 to 1994) (P < .0013. Five trials (1 5%)
`showed a statistically significant difference in survival
`between treatment arms, with a median prolongation
`of the median survival of 2 months (range, 0.7 to 2.7
`months).
`Conclusion: Analysis of past trials in North America
`shows that the prolongation in median survival be-
`tween two arms of a randomized study was rarely in
`excess of 2 months. Techniques for improved use of
`patient resources and appropriate trial design for
`phase III randomized therapeutic trials with patients
`with advanced NSCLC need to be developed.
`J Clin Oncal
`l9:l734-l742. 0 20!” by American
`Society of Clinical Oncology.
`
`trials for patients with
`Prior analysis of phase III
`extensive—stage small—cell lung cancer (SCLC) revealed
`that the median of median survival of patients treated on
`phase III trials and of patients recorded within the SEER
`database increased by 2 months between 1972 and 1990.4
`We therefore chose to review all the published North
`American Cooperative Groups and institutional phase III
`randomized therapeutic trials for patients with advanced-
`stage NSCl.C initiated (luring the time period of i973 to
`1994 in order to assess the impact of systemic chemo-
`therapy on survival over time. As platinum-based regi-
`mens were used throughout the period under review, we
`divided the analyzed trials for comparison purposes
`itccortling; to two equivalent time periods: 1973 through
`1983 and 1984 through 1994. Trials assessing combined-
`modality therapy of chemotherapy plus chest irradiation
`were not included in the analysis.
`We investigated whether the number of trials initiated
`had changed, whether the number of patients enrolled on the
`trials had increased or decreased over time, and whether
`
`survival of patients treated on these trials had improved. the
`median and 5-year survival
`information on patients with
`advanced-stage NSCLC from the last 25 years is available
`on the SEER database. This database provides the data with
`which to compare the outcomes of patients with advanced-
`stage NSCLC in both cooperative groups and in a popula-
`tion database.
`
`i734
`
`Journal ol Clinical Oncology, Vol l9, No 6 (March l5), 2001: pp l734~l742
`
`t r
`Downloaded from jcoascopubsorg on October 24, 2010. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`Copyright © 2001 American Society of Clinical Oncology. A ights reserved.
`OSI EXHIBIT 2009
`APOTEX V. OSI
`IPR2016-01284
`
`OSI EXHIBIT 2009
`APOTEX V. OSI
`IPR2016-01284

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket