throbber
1
`
`2
`3
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`13
`14
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`
`PACKAGE INSERT
`
`TARCEVATM
`(erlotinib)
`Tablets
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`RX Only
`
`TARCEVA (erlotinib) is a Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type
`1/Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
`Erlotinib is a quinazolinamine with the chemical name N-(3-ethynylphenyl)-6,7-
`bis(2-methoxyethoxy)-4-quinazolinamine. TARCEVA contains erlotinib as the
`hydrochloride salt which has the following structural formula:
`
`O
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`HN
`
`N
`
`N
`
`• HCl
`
`Erlotinib hydrochloride has the molecular formula C22H23N3O4.HCl and a molecular
`weight of 429.90. The molecule has a pKa of 5.42 at 25oC. Erlotinib hydrochloride is
`very slightly soluble in water, slightly soluble in methanol and practically insoluble
`in acetonitrile, acetone, ethyl acetate and hexane.
`
`Aqueous solubility of erlotinib hydrochloride is dependent on pH with increased
`solubility at a pH of less than 5 due to protonation of the secondary amine. Over the
`pH range of 1.4 to 9.6, maximal solubility of approximately 0.4 mg/mL occurs at a
`pH of approximately 2.
`
`TARCEVA tablets are available in three dosage strengths containing erlotinib
`hydrochloride (27.3 mg, 109.3 mg and 163.9 mg) equivalent to 25 mg, 100 mg and
`150 mg erlotinib and the following inactive ingredients: lactose monohydrate,
`hypromellose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline
`cellulose, sodium starch glycolate, sodium lauryl sulfate and titanium dioxide. The
`tablets also contain trace amounts of color additives, including FD&C Yellow #6 (25
`mg only) for product identification.
`
`OSI 2026
`APOTEX V. OSI
`IPR2016-01284
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`27
`
`28
`
`29
`30
`31
`32
`33
`
`34
`
`35
`36
`37
`
`38
`
`39
`40
`41
`
`42
`43
`44
`
`45
`
`46
`47
`48
`49
`50
`
`51
`52
`53
`54
`55
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`Mechanism of Action and Pharmacodynamics
`
`The mechanism of clinical antitumor action of erlotinib is not fully characterized.
`Erlotinib inhibits the intracellular phosphorylation of tyrosine kinase associated with
`the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Specificity of inhibition with regard to
`other tyrosine kinase receptors has not been fully characterized. EGFR is expressed
`on the cell surface of normal cells and cancer cells.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Erlotinib is about 60% absorbed after oral administration and its bioavailability is
`substantially increased by food to almost 100%. Its half-life is about 36 hours and it
`is cleared predominantly by CYP3A4 metabolism.
`
`Absorption and Distribution
`
`Bioavailability of erlotinib following a 150 mg oral dose of TARCEVA is about 60%
`and peak plasma levels occur 4 hrs after dosing. Food increases bioavailability
`substantially, to almost 100%.
`
`Following absorption, erlotinib is approximately 93% protein bound to albumin and
`alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG). Erlotinib has an apparent volume of distribution of
`232 liters.
`
`Metabolism and Elimination
`
`In vitro assays of cytochrome P450 metabolism showed that erlotinib is metabolized
`primarily by CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP1A2, and the extrahepatic
`isoform CYP1A1. Following a 100 mg oral dose, 91% of the dose was recovered:
`83% in feces (1% of the dose as intact parent) and 8% in urine (0.3% of the dose as
`intact parent).
`
`A population pharmacokinetic analysis in 591 patients receiving single-agent
`TARCEVA showed a median half-life of 36.2 hours. Time to reach steady state
`plasma concentration would therefore be 7 - 8 days. No significant relationships of
`clearance to patient age, body weight or gender were observed. Smokers had a 24%
`higher rate of erlotinib clearance.
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`56
`
`57
`
`58
`59
`60
`61
`62
`
`63
`
`64
`65
`
`66
`
`67
`68
`69
`70
`71
`
`72
`73
`74
`75
`
`76
`
`77
`78
`
`79
`80
`81
`82
`83
`84
`85
`
`Special Populations
`
`Patients with Hepatic Impairment
`
`Erlotinib is cleared predominantly by the liver. No data are currently available
`regarding the influence of hepatic dysfunction and/or hepatic metastases on the
`pharmacokinetics of erlotinib (see PRECAUTIONS - Patients with Hepatic
`Impairment, ADVERSE REACTIONS and DOSAGE AND
`ADMINISTRATION - Dose Modifications sections).
`
`Patients with Renal Impairment
`
`Less than 9% of a single dose is excreted in the urine. No clinical studies have been
`conducted in patients with compromised renal function.
`
`Interactions
`
`Erlotinib is metabolized predominantly by CYP3A4, and inhibitors of CYP3A4
`would be expected to increase exposure. Co-treatment with the potent CYP3A4
`inhibitor ketoconazole increased erlotinib AUC by 2/3 (see PRECAUTIONS -
`Drug Interactions and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION - Dose
`Modifications sections).
`
`Pre- or co-treatment with the CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin increased erlotinib
`clearance by 3-fold and reduced AUC by 2/3 (see PRECAUTIONS - Drug
`Interactions and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION - Dose Modifications
`sections).
`
`CLINICAL STUDIES
`
`TARCEVA as Monotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
`(NSCLC)
`
`The efficacy and safety of TARCEVA was assessed in a randomized, double blind,
`placebo-controlled trial in 731 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC
`after failure of at least one chemotherapy regimen. Patients were randomized 2:1 to
`receive TARCEVA 150 mg or placebo (488 Tarceva, 243 placebo) orally once daily
`until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Study end points included overall
`survival, response rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). Duration of response
`was also examined. The primary endpoint was survival. The study was conducted in
`
`
`
`
`Page 3
`
`
`
`
`

`

`86
`87
`
`88
`89
`90
`91
`92
`93
`94
`
`95
`96
`
`17 countries. About 1/3 of the patients (238) had EGFR expression status
`characterized.
`
`Table 1 summarizes the demographic and disease characteristics of the study
`population. Demographic characteristics were well balanced between the two
`treatment groups. About two-thirds of the patients were male. Approximately one-
`fourth had a baseline ECOG performance status (PS) of 2, and 9% had a baseline
`ECOG PS of 3. Fifty percent of the patients had received only one prior regimen of
`chemotherapy. About three quarters of these patients were known to have smoked at
`some time.
`
`Table 1: Demographic and Disease Characteristics
`
`TARCEVA
`(N = 488)
`N
`(%)
`
`Placebo
`(N = 243)
`(%)
`
`N
`
`
`Characteristics
`Gender
` Female
` Male
`Age (Years)
` <65
` (cid:116)65
`Race
` Caucasian
` Black
` Asian
` Other
`ECOG Performance Status at
`Baseline*
` 0
` 1
` 2
` 3
`Weight Loss in Previous 6
`Months
` < 5%
` 5 – 10%
`
`
`
`
`(34)
`(66)
`
`(63)
`(37)
`
`(77)
`(5)
`(12)
`(6)
`
`
`(14)
`(54)
`(23)
`(9)
`
`
`(68)
`(15)
`
`173
`315
`
`299
`189
`
`379
`18
`63
`28
`
`
`64
`256
`126
`42
`
`
`320
`96
`
`83
`160
`
`153
`90
`
`188
`12
`28
`15
`
`
`34
`132
`56
`21
`
`
`166
`36
`
`(35)
`(65)
`
`(61)
`(39)
`
`(78)
`(4)
`(13)
`(6)
`
`
`(13)
`(52)
`(26)
`(9)
`
`
`(66)
`(20)
`
`Page 4
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`Characteristics
` > 10%
` Unknown
`Smoking History
` Never Smoked
` Current or Ex-smoker
` Unknown
`Histological Classification
` Adenocarcinoma
` Squamous
` Undifferentiated Large Cell
` Mixed Non-Small Cell
` Other
`Time from Initial Diagnosis to
`Randomization (Months)
` <6
` 6 – 12
` >12
`Best Response to Prior Therapy at
`Baseline*
` CR/PR
` PD
` SD
`Number of Prior Regimens at
`Baseline*
` 1
` 2
` 3
`Exposure to Prior Platinum at
`Baseline*
` Yes
` No
`
`TARCEVA
`(N = 488)
`N
`(%)
`52
`(11)
`20
`(4)
`
`
`104
`(21)
`358
`(73)
`26
`(5)
`
`
`246
`(50)
`144
`(30)
`41
`(8)
`11
`(2)
`46
`(9)
`
`
`
`Placebo
`(N = 243)
`(%)
`(12)
`(5)
`
`(17)
`(77)
`(6)
`
`(49)
`(32)
`(9)
`(<1)
`(9)
`
`
`N
`29
`12
`
`42
`187
`14
`
`119
`78
`23
`2
`21
`
`
`63
`157
`268
`
`
`196
`101
`191
`
`
`243
`238
`7
`
`
`454
`34
`
`(13)
`(32)
`(55)
`
`
`(40)
`(21)
`(39)
`
`
`(50)
`(49)
`(1)
`
`
`(93)
`(7)
`
`34
`85
`124
`
`
`96
`51
`96
`
`
`121
`119
`3
`
`
`224
`19
`
`(14)
`(35)
`(51)
`
`
`(40)
`(21)
`(40)
`
`
`(50)
`(49)
`(1)
`
`
`(92)
`(8)
`
` Stratification factor as documented at baseline; distribution differs slightly from
`values reported at time of randomization.
`
` *
`
`
`
`The results of the study are shown in Table 2.
`
`
`
`
`Page 5
`
`
`97
`98
`99
`100
`
`101
`
`

`

`102
`
`Table 2: Efficacy Results
`
`
`
`Hazard
`Ratio (1)
`
`95% CI
`
`p-value
`
`Tarceva
` Median
`6.7 mo
`31.2%
` Median
`9.9 wk
`
`Placebo
`Median
`4.7 mo
`21.5%
`Median
`7.9 wk
`
`8.9%
`Median
`34.3 wk
`
`0.9%
`Median
`15.9 wk
`
`103
`104
`105
`106
`107
`108
`109
`110
`111
`112
`113
`114
`
`0.73
`
`
`0.59
`
`
`
`
`
`0.61 – 0.86
`
`
`<0.001 (2)
`
`
`0.50 – 0.70
`
`<0.001 (2)
`
`
`
`
`
`<0.001 (3)
`
`
`
`Survival
`1-year Survival
`Progression-
`Free Survival
`Tumor
`Response
`(CR+PR)
`Response
`Duration
`
`(1) Cox regression model with the following covariates: ECOG performance
`status, number of prior regimens, prior platinum, best response to prior
`chemotherapy.
`(2) Two-sided Log-Rank test stratified by ECOG performance status, number
`of prior regimens, prior platinum, best response to prior chemotherapy.
`(3) Two-sided Fisher’s exact test
`
`
`Survival was evaluated in the intent-to-treat population. Figure 1 depicts the Kaplan-
`Meier curves for overall survival. The primary survival and PFS analyses were two-
`sided Log-Rank tests stratified by ECOG performance status, number of prior
`regimens, prior platinum, best response to prior chemotherapy.
`
`
`
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`

`

`115
`116
`117
`118
`119
`120
`
`121
`122
`123
`124
`125
`
`Note: HR is from Cox regression model with the following
`covariates: ECOG performance status, number of prior regimens,
`prior platinum, best response to prior chemotherapy. P-value is from
`two-sided Log-Rank test stratified by ECOG performance status,
`number of prior regimens, prior platinum, best response to prior
`chemotherapy.
`
`A series of subsets of patients were examined in exploratory univariate analyses. The
`results of these analyses are shown in Figure 2.The effect of TARCEVA on survival
`was similar across most subsets. An apparently larger effect, however, was observed
`in two subsets: patients with EGFR positive tumors (HR = 0.65) and patients who
`never smoked (HR = 0.42). These subsets are considered further below.
`
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`
`
`
`

`

`126
`127
`
`Figure 2: Survival Hazard Ratio (HR) (Tarceva : Placebo) in Subgroups
`According to Pretreatment Characteristics
`
`128
`
`129
`130
`
`
`
`
`Note: Depicted are the univariate hazard ratio (HR) for death in the TARCEVA
`patients relative to the placebo patients, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the
`
`
`
`Page 8
`
`
`
`
`

`

`131
`132
`133
`134
`135
`136
`
`137
`138
`
`139
`140
`141
`142
`143
`144
`145
`146
`147
`148
`
`149
`150
`151
`152
`153
`154
`155
`156
`
`157
`158
`159
`160
`161
`
`162
`163
`
`HR, and the sample size (N) in each subgroup. The hash mark on the horizontal bar
`represents the HR, and the length of the horizontal bar represents the 95%
`confidence interval. A hash mark to the left of the vertical line corresponds to a HR
`that is less than 1.00, which indicates that survival is better in the TARCEVA arm
`compared with the placebo arm in that subgroup.
`
`
`
`Relation of Results to EGFR Protein Expression Status (as
`Determined by Immunohistochemistry)
`
`Analysis of the impact of EGFR expression status on the treatment effect on clinical
`outcome is limited because EGFR status is known for only 238 study patients (33%).
`EGFR status was ascertained for patients who already had tissue samples prior to
`study enrollment. However, the survival in the EGFR tested population, and the
`effect of TARCEVA were almost identical to that in the entire study population,
`suggesting that the tested population was a representative sample. A positive EGFR
`expression status was defined as having at least 10% of cells staining for EGFR in
`contrast to the 1% cut-off specified in the DAKO EGFR pharmDxTM kit instructions.
`The use of the pharmDx kit has not been validated for use in non-small cell lung
`cancer.
`
`TARCEVA prolonged survival in the EGFR positive subgroup (N = 127; HR = 0.65;
`95% CI = 0.43 – 0.97)(Figure 3) and the subgroup whose EGFR status was
`unmeasured (N = 493; HR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.61 – 0.93)(Figure 5), but did not
`appear to have an effect on survival in the EGFR negative subgroup (N = 111; HR =
`1.01; 95% CI = 0.65 – 1.57)(Figure 4). However, the confidence intervals for the
`EGFR positive, negative and unmeasured subgroups are wide and overlap, so that a
`survival benefit due to TARCEVA in the EGFR negative subgroup cannot be
`excluded.
`
`For the subgroup of patients who never smoked, EGFR status also appeared to be
`predictive of TARCEVA survival benefit. Patients who never smoked and were
`EGFR positive had a large TARCEVA survival benefit (N = 30; HR = 0.27; 95% CI
`= 0.11 – 0.67). There were too few EGFR negative patients who never smoked to
`reach a conclusion.
`
`Tumor responses were observed in all EGFR subgroups: 11.6% in the EGFR positive
`subgroup, 9.5% in the EGFR unmeasured subgroup and 3.2% in the EGFR negative
`
`
`
`
`Page 9
`
`
`
`
`

`

`164
`165
`166
`167
`
`subgroup. An improvement in progression free survival was demonstrated in the
`EGFR positive subgroup (HR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33 – 0.72), the EGFR unmeasured
`subgroup (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.46 – 0.70), and less certain in the EGFR negative
`subgroup (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.59 – 1.39).
`
`168
`
`
`
`169
`
`
`
`
`Page 10
`
`
`
`
`

`

`170
`
`
`
`171
`172
`
`173
`174
`175
`176
`177
`
`178
`
`179
`180
`181
`
`182
`183
`184
`185
`186
`
`
`
`TARCEVA Administered Concurrently with Chemotherapy in NSCLC
`
`Results from two, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, trials in over 1000
`patients conducted in first-line patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC
`showed no clinical benefit with the concurrent administration of TARCEVA with
`platinum-based chemotherapy [carboplatin and paclitaxel (TARCEVA, N = 526) or
`gemcitabine and cisplatin (TARCEVA, N = 580)].
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`
`TARCEVA is indicated for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or
`metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy
`regimen.
`
`Results from two, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, Phase 3 trials
`conducted in first-line patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC showed
`no clinical benefit with the concurrent administration of TARCEVA with platinum-
`based chemotherapy [carboplatin and paclitaxel or gemcitabine and cisplatin] and its
`use is not recommended in that setting.
`
`
`
`
`Page 11
`
`
`
`
`

`

`187
`
`188
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`None.
`
`189
`
`WARNINGS
`
`190
`
`191
`192
`193
`194
`195
`196
`197
`198
`199
`200
`201
`202
`203
`204
`
`205
`206
`207
`208
`209
`210
`
`211
`
`212
`213
`214
`215
`216
`217
`218
`
`Pulmonary Toxicity
`
`There have been infrequent reports of serious Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD),
`including fatalities, in patients receiving TARCEVA for treatment of NSCLC or
`other advanced solid tumors. In the randomized single-agent study (see CLINICAL
`STUDIES section), the incidence of ILD (0.8%) was the same in both the placebo
`and TARCEVA groups. The overall incidence in TARCEVA-treated patients from
`all studies (including uncontrolled studies and studies with concurrent
`chemotherapy) was approximately 0.6%. Reported diagnoses in patients suspected of
`having ILD included pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia, interstitial lung disease,
`obliterative bronchiolitis, pulmonary fibrosis, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
`and lung infiltration. Symptoms started from 5 days to more than 9 months (median
`47 days) after initiating TARCEVA therapy. Most of the cases were associated with
`confounding or contributing factors such as concomitant/prior chemotherapy, prior
`radiotherapy, pre-existing parenchymal lung disease, metastatic lung disease, or
`pulmonary infections.
`
`In the event of acute onset of new or progressive, unexplained pulmonary symptoms
`such as dyspnea, cough, and fever, TARCEVA therapy should be interrupted
`pending diagnostic evaluation. If ILD is diagnosed, TARCEVA should be
`discontinued and appropriate treatment instituted as necessary (see ADVERSE
`REACTIONS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION - Dose Modifications
`sections).
`
`Pregnancy Category D
`
`Erlotinib has been shown to cause maternal toxicity with associated embryo/fetal
`lethality and abortion in rabbits when given at doses that result in plasma drug
`concentrations of approximately 3 times those in humans (AUCs at 150 mg daily
`dose). When given during the period of organogenesis to achieve plasma drug
`concentrations approximately equal to those in humans, based on AUC, there was no
`increased incidence of embryo/fetal lethality or abortion in rabbits or rats. However,
`female rats treated with 30 mg/m2/day or 60 mg/m2/day (0.3 or 0.7 times the clinical
`
`
`
`
`Page 12
`
`
`
`
`

`

`219
`220
`221
`
`222
`
`223
`224
`225
`226
`227
`228
`229
`
`dose, on a mg/m2 basis) of erlotinib prior to mating through the first week of
`pregnancy had an increase in early resorptions which resulted in a decrease in the
`number of live fetuses.
`
`No teratogenic effects were observed in rabbits or rats.
`
`There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women using
`TARCEVA. Women of childbearing potential should be advised to avoid pregnancy
`while on TARCEVA. Adequate contraceptive methods should be used during
`therapy, and for at least 2 weeks after completing therapy. Treatment should only be
`continued in pregnant women if the potential benefit to the mother outweighs the risk
`to the fetus. If TARCEVA is used during pregnancy, the patient should be apprised
`of the potential hazard to the fetus or potential risk for loss of the pregnancy.
`
`230
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`231
`
`232
`233
`234
`235
`236
`237
`
`238
`239
`240
`241
`242
`243
`244
`245
`
`246
`
`247
`248
`249
`
`Drug Interactions
`
`Co-treatment with the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole increases erlotinib
`AUC by 2/3. Caution should be used when administering or taking TARCEVA with
`ketoconazole and other strong CYP3A4 inhibitors such as atanazavir,
`clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir,
`saquinavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin (TAO), and voriconazole (see DOSAGE
`AND ADMINISTRATION - Dose Modifications section).
`
`Pre-treatment with the CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin decreased erlotinib AUC by
`about 2/3. Alternate treatments lacking CYP3A4 inducing activity should be
`considered. If an alternative treatment is unavailable, a TARCEVA dose greater than
`150 mg should be considered. If the TARCEVA dose is adjusted upward, the dose
`will need to be reduced upon discontinuation of rifampicin or other inducers. Other
`CYP3A4 inducers include rifabutin, rifapentin, phenytoin, carbamazepine,
`phenobarbital and St. John's Wort (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION -
`Dose Modifications section).
`
`Hepatotoxicity
`
`Asymptomatic increases in liver transaminases have been observed in TARCEVA
`treated patients; therefore, periodic liver function testing (transaminases, bilirubin,
`and alkaline phosphatase) should be considered. Dose reduction or interruption of
`
`
`
`
`Page 13
`
`
`
`
`

`

`250
`251
`
`252
`
`253
`254
`255
`256
`257
`
`258
`
`259
`260
`261
`262
`263
`
`264
`
`265
`
`266
`267
`268
`269
`
`270
`
`271
`272
`
`273
`
`274
`275
`276
`277
`
`TARCEVA should be considered if changes in liver function are severe (see
`ADVERSE REACTIONS section).
`
`Patients with Hepatic Impairment
`
`In vitro and in vivo evidence suggest that erlotinib is cleared primarily by the liver.
`Therefore, erlotinib exposure may be increased in patients with hepatic dysfunction
`(see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY - Special Populations - Patients with
`Hepatic Impairment and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION - Dose
`Modification sections).
`
`Elevated International Normalized Ratio and Potential Bleeding
`
`International Normalized Ratio (INR) elevations, and infrequent reports of bleeding
`events including gastrointestinal bleeding have been reported in clinical studies,
`some associated with concomitant warfarin administration. Patients taking warfarin
`or other coumarin-derivative anticoagulants should be monitored regularly for
`changes in prothrombin time or INR (see ADVERSE REACTIONS section).
`
`Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
`
`Erlotinib has not been tested for carcinogenicity.
`
`Erlotinib has been tested for genotoxicity in a series of in vitro assays (bacterial
`mutation, human lymphocyte chromosome aberration, and mammalian cell
`mutation) and an in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus test and did not cause
`genetic damage. Erlotinib did not impair fertility in either male or female rats.
`
`Pregnancy
`
`Pregnancy Category D (see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS - Information
`for Patients sections).
`
`Nursing Mothers
`
`It is not known whether erlotinib is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are
`excreted in human milk and because the effects of TARCEVA on infants have not
`been studied, women should be advised against breast-feeding while receiving
`TARCEVA therapy.
`
`
`
`
`Page 14
`
`
`
`
`

`

`278
`
`279
`280
`
`281
`
`282
`283
`284
`285
`286
`287
`
`288
`
`289
`290
`291
`292
`293
`294
`
`295
`296
`
`297
`
`298
`299
`300
`301
`302
`303
`
`304
`305
`306
`307
`
`Pediatric Use
`
`The safety and effectiveness of TARCEVA in pediatric patients have not been
`studied.
`
`Geriatric Use
`
`Of the total number of patients participating in the randomized trial, 62% were less
`than 65 years of age, and 38% of patients were aged 65 years or older. The survival
`benefit was maintained across both age groups (see CLINICAL STUDIES section).
`No meaningful differences in safety or pharmacokinetics were observed between
`younger and older patients. Therefore, no dosage adjustments are recommended in
`elderly patients.
`
`Information for Patients
`
`If the following signs or symptoms occur, patients should seek medical advice
`promptly (see WARNINGS, ADVERSE REACTIONS and DOSAGE AND
`ADMINISTRATION - Dose Modification sections).
`(cid:120) Severe or persistent diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, or vomiting
`(cid:120) Onset or worsening of unexplained shortness of breath or cough
`(cid:120) Eye irritation
`
`Women of childbearing potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant
`while taking TARCEVA (see WARNINGS - Pregnancy Category D section).
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`
`Safety evaluation of TARCEVA is based on 856 cancer patients who received
`TARCEVA as monotherapy and 1228 patients who received TARCEVA
`concurrently with chemotherapy. Adverse events, regardless of causality, that
`occurred in at least 10% of patients treated with TARCEVA and at least 3% more
`often than in the placebo group in the randomized trial are summarized by NCI-CTC
`(version 2.0) Grade in Table 3.
`
`There have been reports of serious ILD, including fatalities, in patients receiving
`TARCEVA for treatment of NSCLC or other advanced solid tumors (see
`WARNINGS - Pulmonary Toxicity, and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION -
`Dose Modifications sections).
`
`
`
`
`Page 15
`
`
`
`
`

`

`308
`309
`310
`311
`312
`313
`314
`315
`
`The most common adverse reactions in patients receiving TARCEVA were rash and
`diarrhea. Grade 3/4 rash and diarrhea occurred in 9% and 6%, respectively, in
`TARCEVA-treated patients. Rash and diarrhea each resulted in study
`discontinuation in 1% of TARCEVA-treated patients. Six percent and 1% of patients
`needed dose reduction for rash and diarrhea, respectively. The median time to onset
`of rash was 8 days, and the median time to onset of diarrhea was 12 days.
`
`Table 3:
`
`Adverse Events Occurring in (cid:149)10% of TARCEVA-treated Patients
`(2:1 Randomization of TARCEVA to Placebo)
`
`
`
`NCI CTC Grade
`MedDRA Preferred
`Term
`Rash
`Diarrhea
`Anorexia
`Fatigue
`Dyspnea
`Cough
`Nausea
`Infection
`Vomiting
`Stomatitis
`Pruritus
`Dry skin
`Conjunctivitis
`Keratoconjunctivitis
`sicca
`Abdominal pain
`
`TARCEVA
`N = 485
`Grade
`3
`
`Any
`Grade
`
`Grade
`4
`
`Any
`Grade
`
`Placebo
`N = 242
`Grade
`3
`
`Grade
`4
`
`%
`75
`54
`52
`52
`41
`33
`33
`24
`23
`17
`13
`12
`12
`12
`
`11
`
`%
`8
`6
`8
`14
`17
`4
`3
`4
`2
`<1
`<1
`0
`<1
`0
`
`2
`
`%
`<1
`<1
`1
`4
`11
`0
`0
`0
`<1
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`<1
`
`%
`17
`18
`38
`45
`35
`29
`24
`15
`19
`3
`5
`4
`2
`3
`
`7
`
`%
`0
`<1
`5
`16
`15
`2
`2
`2
`2
`0
`0
`0
`<1
`0
`
`1
`
`%
`0
`0
`<1
`4
`11
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`<1
`
`316
`317
`318
`319
`320
`321
`
`Liver function test abnormalities (including elevated alanine aminotransferase
`(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and bilirubin) have been observed. These
`elevations were mainly transient or associated with liver metastases. Grade 2 (>2.5 –
`5.0 x ULN) ALT elevations occurred in 4% and <1% of TARCEVA and placebo
`treated patients, respectively. Grade 3 (> 5.0 – 20.0 x ULN) elevations were not
`observed in TARCEVA-treated patients. Dose reduction or interruption of
`
`
`
`
`Page 16
`
`
`
`
`

`

`322
`323
`
`324
`325
`326
`327
`
`328
`329
`330
`
`331
`332
`333
`334
`
`335
`
`336
`337
`338
`339
`340
`341
`342
`
`343
`
`344
`345
`346
`347
`
`348
`
`349
`350
`351
`
`TARCEVA should be considered if changes in liver function are severe (see
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION - Dose Modification section).
`
`Infrequent cases of gastrointestinal bleeding have been reported in clinical studies,
`some associated with concomitant warfarin administration (see PRECAUTIONS -
`Elevated International Normalized Ratio and Potential Bleeding section) and
`some with concomitant NSAID administration.
`
`NCI CTC grade 3 conjunctivitis and keratitis have been reported infrequently in
`patients receiving TARCEVA therapy. Corneal ulcerations may also occur (see
`PRECAUTIONS - Information for Patients section).
`
`In general, no notable differences in the safety of TARCEVA could be discerned
`between females or males and between patients younger or older than the age of 65
`years. The safety of TARCEVA appears similar in Caucasian and Asian patients (see
`PRECAUTIONS - Geriatric Use section).
`
`OVERDOSAGE
`
`Single oral doses of TARCEVA up to 1,000 mg in healthy subjects, and up to 1,600
`mg in cancer patients have been tolerated. Repeated twice-daily doses of 200 mg in
`healthy subjects were poorly tolerated after only a few days of dosing. Based on the
`data from these studies, an unacceptable incidence of severe adverse events, such as
`diarrhea, rash, and liver transaminase elevation, may occur above the recommended
`dose of 150 mg daily. In case of suspected overdose, TARCEVA should be withheld
`and symptomatic treatment instituted.
`
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
`
`The recommended daily dose of TARCEVA is 150 mg taken at least one hour before
`or two hours after the ingestion of food. Treatment should continue until disease
`progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. There is no evidence that treatment
`beyond progression is beneficial.
`
`Dose Modifications
`
`In patients who develop an acute onset of new or progressive pulmonary symptoms,
`such as dyspnea, cough or fever, treatment with TARCEVA should be interrupted
`pending diagnostic evaluation. If ILD is diagnosed, TARCEVA should be
`
`
`
`
`Page 17
`
`
`
`
`

`

`352
`353
`
`354
`355
`356
`357
`
`358
`359
`
`360
`361
`362
`363
`364
`
`365
`366
`367
`368
`369
`370
`371
`372
`
`373
`374
`375
`376
`377
`378
`
`379
`
`380
`381
`
`discontinued and appropriate treatment instituted as necessary (see WARNINGS –
`Pulmonary Toxicity section).
`
`Diarrhea can usually be managed with loperamide. Patients with severe diarrhea who
`are unresponsive to loperamide or who become dehydrated may require dose
`reduction or temporary interruption of therapy. Patients with severe skin reactions
`may also require dose reduction or temporary interruption of therapy.
`
`When dose reduction is necessary, the TARCEVA dose should be reduced in 50 mg
`decrements.
`
`In patients who are being concomitantly treated with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor
`such as atanazavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole,
`nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, troleandomycin (TAO),
`or voriconazole, a dose reduction should be considered should severe adverse
`reactions occur.
`
`Pre-treatment with the CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin decreased erlotinib AUC by
`about 2/3. Alternate treatments lacking CYP3A4 inducing activity should be
`considered. If an alternative treatment is unavailable, a TARCEVA dose greater than
`150 mg should be considered. If the TARCEVA dose is adjusted upward, the dose
`will need to be reduced upon discontinuation of rifampicin or other inducers. Other
`CYP3A4 inducers include rifabutin, rifapentin, phenytoin, carbamazepine,
`phenobarbital and St. John's Wort. These too should be avoided if possible (see
`PRECAUTIONS - Drug Interactions section).
`
`Erlotinib is eliminated by hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion. Therefore,
`caution should be used when administering TARCEVA to patients with hepatic
`impairment. Dose reduction or interruption of TARCEVA should be considered
`should severe adverse reactions occur (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY -
`Special Populations – Patients With Hepatic Impairment, PRECAUTIONS -
`Patients With Hepatic Impairment, and ADVERSE REACTIONS sections).
`
`HOW SUPPLIED
`
`The 25 mg, 100 mg and 150 mg strengths are supplied as white film-coated tablets
`for daily oral administration.
`
`
`
`
`Page 18
`
`
`
`
`

`

`382
`383
`384
`
`385
`386
`387
`
`388
`389
`390
`
`391
`
`392
`393
`
`TARCEVATM (erlotinib) Tablets, 25 mg: Round, biconvex face and straight sides,
`white film-coated, printed in orange with a “T” and “25” on one side and plain on the
`other side. Supplied in bottles of 30 tablets (NDC 50242-062-01).
`
`TARCEVATM (erlotinib) Tablets, 100 mg: Round, biconvex face and straight sides,
`white film-coated, printed in gray with “T” and “100” on one side and plain on the
`other side. Supplied in bottles of 30 tablets (NDC 50242-063-01).
`
`TARCEVATM (erlotinib) Tablets, 150 mg: Round, biconvex face and straight sides,
`white film-coated, printed in maroon with “T” and “150” on one side and plain on
`the other side. Supplied in bottles of 30 tablets (NDC 50242-064-01).
`
`STORAGE
`
`Store at 25°C (77°F); excursions permitted to 15° – 30°C (59° – 86°F). See USP
`Controlled Room Temperature.
`
`
`
`
`Page 19
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Manufactured for:
`OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc., Melville, NY 11747
`Manufactured by:
`Schwarz Pharma Manufacturing, Seymour, IN 47274
`Distributed by:
`Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080-4990
`
`For further information please call 1-877-TARCEVA (1-877-827-2382).
`
`TARCEVA and
`are trademarks of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Melville, NY, 11747, USA.
`©2004 OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Genentech, Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`Page 20
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
` /s/
`---------------------
`Robert Temple
`11/18/04 06:47:27 PM
`
`Page 21
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket