`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________
`
`TV MANAGEMENT, INC., d/b/a GPS NORTH AMERICA
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PERDIEM CO., LLC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01061 (Patent 8,223,012)
`IPR2016-01064 (Patent 9,003,499)
`IPR2016-01278 (Patent 9,071,931)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT
`
`
`
`
`
`Overview of the Common Written Description
`
`User defined zones to track objects:
`
`Ex. 1001/the ’012 Patent at 17:4-8
`
`1
`
`
`
`Overview of the Common Written Description
`
`Conveying information using user IDs
`
`The ’012 Patent at 2:18-22
`
`Conveying information using access codes
`
`The ’012 Patent at 7:63-66
`
`2
`
`
`
`Overview of the Common Written Description
`
`Administrators configure information sharing environments
`
`Ex. 1001/the ’012 Patent at 5:41-47
`
`The ’012 Patent at 5:53-55
`
`3
`
`
`
`Overview of Fast (102 reference)
`
`Ex. 1003/Fast at Abstract
`
`Fast at 20:46-51
`
`Fast at 20:57-63
`
`Fast at 20:63-67
`
`Fast at 21:5-7
`
`4
`
`
`
`Overview of Fast (102 reference)
`
`Fast’s hierarchy (FIG. 22)
`
`5
`
`
`
`Overview of Fast (102 reference)
`
`Subscriber’s portal (FIGS. 16A and 16B)
`
`6
`
`
`
`Overview of Fast (102 reference)
`
`Subscriber’s portal (FIGS. 16A and 16B)
`
`Fast at 42:29-35
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`7
`
`
`
`Overview of Fast (102 reference)
`
`Scenario Manager (FIGS. 11A and 11B)
`
`8
`
`
`
`The ’012 Patent’s claims
`
`Representative Claim 1
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.7 (citing Claim 1 of the 012 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`9
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`“administrator” and “first user”
`
`Fast at FIG. 14-2 (page 18)
`
`Petition at p.18
`
`Fast at 38:52-54
`
`10
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`“administrator” and “first user”
`
`Ex. 1014/ Dr. Heppe Declaration at para 30
`
`Ex. 1014 at para 45
`
`Fast at FIG. 16-2
`
`11
`
`
`
`The ’012 Patent’s claims
`
`A First user can also be an administrator
`
`“the mother is an administrator who authorizes herself as
`a first user by setting her own information access code”
`Reply at p.3
`
`012 Patent at 13:22-25
`
`012 Patent at 9:23-26
`
`“an ‘administrator’ and an ‘authorized user,’
`construed according to their broadest reasonable
`interpretation, are not mutually exclusive.”
`(IPR2016-01063, institution decision, paper 20,
`p.10).
`
`12
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`“information access code” equates to Fast’s notification scheme number/name
`
`Institution Decision at p.9
`
`Fast at 34:31-37
`
`Fast at 32:51-56
`
`Fast at 35:46-52
`
`13
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`“information access code” equates to Fast’s User Type
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.13
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`14
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Haney
`
`Haney’s Buddy Groups
`
`Ex. 1005/Haney at Abstract
`
`Haney at 17:55-63
`
`Haney at 17:65-18:1
`
`15
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Haney
`
`Haney’s Buddy Groups
`
`Haney at 19:30-44
`
`Ex. 1009/Dr. Heppe at para 121
`
`16
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Haney
`
`Motivation to combine
`
`Ex. 1009/Dr. Heppe at para 52
`
`Fast at 9:56-61
`
`17
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Haney
`
`Dr. Schonfeld’s opinion (Ex. 2011)
`
`Ex. 2011/Dr. Schonfeld at para 22
`
`Fast at Abstract
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`18
`
`
`
`Other Independent claims of the ’012 Patent
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.8
`
`19
`
`
`
`The ’499 Patent’s claims
`
`Representative Claim 1
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim 1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`20
`
`
`
`The ’499 Patent’s claims
`
`Representative Claim 1
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim 1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`21
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – subscriber level ISE
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing
`Claim 1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Fast at 32:51-56
`
`Fast at 20:46-51
`
`22
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – subscriber level ISE
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Ex. 1010 at para 45
`
`23
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`Fast at 42:31-35
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim 1
`of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`“A POSITA would understand that a subscriber may grant access
`privileges to guardians or rescue personnel who may themselves build
`and manage scenarios. This is shown in Fig. 16, where the subscriber’s
`portal allows a subscriber to “Assign access levels to system users,” and
`then discloses that these users could be any of the user types that could
`also be granted access to the subscriber portal, e.g. guardians.”
`
`Ex. 1010 at para 149
`
`24
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – subscriber level ISE
`
`Fast at FIG. 16-1
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Fast at 16:9-11
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.4
`
`25
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – subscriber level ISE
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Petitioner Reply at p.5
`
`Petitioner Reply at p.6
`
`Fast at 43:1-2
`
`26
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – subscriber level ISE
`
`Fast at 36:36-38
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.4
`
`Fast at 35:17-20
`
`Fast at FIG. 11-1
`
`“Second, we disagree, for the reasons stated in
`connection with claim construction and also stated
`immediately above, that Fast’s “scenario names” are
`not within the broadest reasonable interpretation of
`“event information access codes.” Petition at p.32
`
`27
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – subscriber level ISE
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim 1 of
`the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Fast at 42:35-40
`
`Fast at 35:41-43
`
`Fast at 35:17-20
`
`28
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity – Wholesale level ISE
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Fast at FIG. 22
`
`Fast at 42:36-41
`
`29
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Overview of Zou
`
`Ex. 1005/Zou at FIG. 18e
`
`Ex. 1005/Zou at FIG. 18b
`
`30
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Overview of Zou
`
`Ex. 1005/ Zou at para 0192 (emphasis added)
`
`Ex. 1005/ Zou at para 206 (emphasis added)
`
`Ex. 1010 at para 123
`
`31
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Overview of invalidity – Limitation [K]
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim 1 of the 499
`Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Zou at para 192 (emphasis added)
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at p.17
`
`32
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Overview of invalidity – Limitation [L]
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Petition at p.6
`
`Ex. 1010 at para 142
`
`33
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Overview of invalidity – Limitation [M]
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.8-9 (citing Claim
`1 of the 499 Patent (Emphasis added).
`
`Zou at para 204 (emphasis added)
`
`34
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Dr. Schonfeld’s opinion
`
`Zou at para 0192 (emphasis added)
`
`Ex. 2011 at para 25 (emphasis added)
`
`35
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Motivation to combine
`
`Ex. 1010 at para 57
`
`Fast at 33:1-7
`
`Zou at para 0008
`
`36
`
`
`
`Ground 2: Fast + Zou
`
`Dr. Schonfeld’s opinion (Ex. 2011)
`
`Ex. 2011/Dr. Schonfeld at para 22
`
`Fast at Abstract
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`37
`
`
`
`The ’931 Patent’s claims
`
`Claim 1
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.4-5 (citing Claim 1 of the 931 Patent).
`
`38
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity
`
`39
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity
`
`Fast at FIG. 16-1
`
`Fast at 20:46-51
`
`Fast at 42:47-52
`
`40
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity
`
`Fast at 35:7-11
`
`Fast at 36:17-22
`
`Fast at 42:26-31
`
`Fast at 36:1-4
`
`41
`
`
`
`Ground 1: Anticipation by Fast
`
`Overview of invalidity
`
`Heppe Dec./Ex. 1011 at para 176
`
`Fast at 31:24-29
`
`Fast at 27:38-42
`
`Fast at 32:38-44
`
`42
`
`
`
`The Group Feature of the 931 Patent
`
`Fast discloses the “group feature”
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.17
`
`Fast at 20:63-67 (emphasis added)
`
`Fast at 36:12-16 (emphasis added)
`
`Fast at 35:17-20
`
`43
`
`
`
`The Group Feature of the 931 Patent
`
`Phillips discloses the “group feature”
`
`Ex. 1007/ Phillips at FIG. 32
`
`44
`
`
`
`The Group Feature of the 931 Patent
`
`Phillips discloses the “group feature”
`
`Phillips at 4:63-5:1 (emphasis added)
`
`Phillips at 19:4-17 (emphasis added)
`
`45
`
`
`
`The Group Feature of the 931 Patent
`
`Zou discloses the “group feature”
`
`Zou at para 204 (emphasis added)
`
`46
`
`
`
`The Server Feature of the 931 Patent
`
`Fast discloses the “Server feature”
`
`Fast at 27:38-44
`
`Patent Owner Response at p.25 (emphasis added)
`
`Fast at 31:24-29 (emphasis added)
`
`Fast at 30:63-31:3 (emphasis added)
`
`47
`
`
`
`The Server Feature of the 931 Patent
`
`Phillips discloses the “Server feature”
`
`Phillips at 9:53-63 (emphasis added)
`
`Ex. 1011 at paragraphs 62 and 63
`
`48
`
`
`
`Claims 23 and 24 of the 931 Patent
`
`Fast anticipates claims 23 and 24
`
`Ex. 1001/ 931 patent, claims 23 and 24
`
`Ex. 1011 at paragraphs 230 and 234
`
`49
`
`
`
`Claims 23 and 24 of the 931 Patent
`
`Claims 23 and 24 are obvious
`
`Ex. 1011 at paragraphs 229
`
`Petitioner’s Reply at pp.21-22.
`
`50
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Licensing Evidence Does Not Amount to a
`Secondary Consideration to Rebut the Obviousness Case
`
`In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282, 1293-94 (Fed.
`Cir. 2012) (emphasis added)
`
`Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Case No. 2016-
`1352, at pp.24-25, (Fed. Cir. April 12, 2017)
`
`51
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Alleged Prior Conception
`
`Institution Decision at p. 18
`
`Diem Declaration/ Ex. 2009 at para 13
`
`52
`
`
`
`The ’931 Patent’s claims
`
`Claim 1
`
`Patent Owner Response at pp.4-5 (citing Claim 1 of the 931 Patent) (emphasis added)
`
`53
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing paper and any
`
`supporting materials were served via electronic mail on September 7, 2017, as
`
`agreed to by the parties pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.105, in its entirety on the
`
`following:
`
`Alan Whitehurst AlanWhitehurst@quinnemanuel.com
`Marissa Ducca marissaducca@quinnemanuel.com
`Quinn-PerDiem@quinnemanuel.com
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`777 6th Street NW 11th floor
`Washington, D.C. 20001-3706
`
`Robert Babayi robert@vectoriplaw.com
`Vector IP
`3208 Q St. NW
`Washington D.C. 2007
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON, LLP
`
`
`
`/Vivek Ganti/
` Vivek Ganti
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`3350 Riverwood Pkwy, Suite 800 Registration No. 71,368
`Atlanta, GA 30339
`(770) 953-0995
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: September 7, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
