throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 8
`Entered: December 21, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ZTE (USA) INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., HTC CORPORATION, and
`HTC AMERICA, INC.
` Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01277
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, PATRICK M. BOUCHER, and
`TERRENCE W. McMILLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McMILLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Instituting Inter Partes Review and Consolidating with IPR2016-01208
`37 C.F.R. § 42.108 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.122(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`IPR2016-01208
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`We have instituted trial in IPR2016-01208. The Petition herein states that it
`
`“is identical in substance to the petition that Apple Inc. et al. filed on June 20, 2016
`in IPR2016-01208 (‘the Apple proceeding’),” and is “limited to the same claims,
`grounds, arguments, and evidence presented in the Apple proceeding.” Pet. 1.
`Petitioner states that it intends to seek joinder with the Apple proceeding under 35
`U.S.C. § 315(c), 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.22, and 42.122(b). Id.
`For the reasons expressed in our Decision instituting trial in the Apple
`proceeding, we likewise determine that the record in this proceeding establishes a
`reasonable likelihood that Petitioners will prevail in showing that claims 1–10 of
`U.S. Patent No. 7,746,916 B2 (“the ’916 patent”) are unpatentable. We, therefore,
`institute trial as we did in IPR2016-01208, and consolidate the two inter partes
`reviews, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.122(a). A motion for
`joinder is not required.
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314, an inter partes review is
`hereby instituted on the following grounds:
`1. Whether claims 1–3, 5–8, and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102
`as having been anticipated by Zhuang327;
`2. Whether claims 6–8 and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`having been obvious over Zhuang327;
`3. Whether claims 4 and 9 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`having been obvious over Zhuang327 and Popović;
`4. Whether claims 1–3, 5–8, and 10 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103
`as having been obvious over Zhuang327 and Hou; and
`
`

`
`
`IPR2016-01208
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. Whether claims 4 and 9 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
`having been obvious over Zhuang327, Hou, and Popović;
`FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.4, notice is hereby given of the institution of a trial on the grounds of
`unpatentability authorized above; the trial commences on the entry date of this
`Decision; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §315(d) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.122(a), this inter partes review is hereby consolidated with the trial in
`IPR2016-01208;
`FURTHER ORDERED that all future filings are to be made in IPR2016-
`01208, using the combined case caption as attached to this Decision;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner and the Petitioner in IPR2016-01208
`(“Petitioners”) will share all time permitted for depositions and will file all papers,
`except for papers that do not involve the other petitioner, as a consolidated paper,
`and that consolidated papers will not be given additional pages or words unless
`otherwise authorized by the Board;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, if a petitioner wishes to make statements or
`provide information or material separately from the other petitioner in a
`consolidated paper, the paper must identify and attribute such separate statements
`and information or material clearly;
`FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of accessing the electronic record,
`counsel for Petitioner will be added as backup counsel of record of the Petitioner in
`IPR2016-01208 (e.g., by filing an appearance in that case), and that only a single
`attorney may be designated as lead counsel for Petitioners;
`FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Decision shall be entered in the
`record of IPR2016-01208.
`PETITIONER:
`
`

`
`
`IPR2016-01208
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Roberto J. Devoto
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`IPR00035-0006IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`Charles McMahon
`Hersh Mehta
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
`cmcmahon@mwe.com
`hmehta@mwe.com
`
`James Glass
`Kevin Johnson
`Todd Briggs
`John McKee
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Stephen Korniczky
`Martin Bader
`Ericka Schulz
`SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
`skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com
`mbader@sheppardmullin.com
`eschulz@sheppardmullin.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Cyrus Morton
`Ryan M. Schultz
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`rschultz@robinskaplan.com
`
`
`
`

`
`
`IPR2016-01208
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE, INC., HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., MICROSOFT
`CORPORATION, MICROSOFT MOBILE OY, MICROSOFT MOBILE, INC.,
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., and ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
` Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-012081
`Patent 7,746,916 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2016-01277 has been consolidated with this proceeding.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket