IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`BROADCOM LIMITED, BROADCOM
`CORPORATION, AVAGO
`TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., AVAGO
`TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., and LSI
`CORPORATION
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 2:16-cv-134
`
`Hon. Rodney Gilstrap
`
`BROADCOM LIMITED, BROADCOM CORPORATION,
`AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC.,
`AND LSI CORPORATION’S PATENT RULE 3-3 INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`Pursuant to Patent Rule 3.3 of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas,
`
`and the Docket Control Order entered in this case, Defendants Broadcom Corporation,
`
`Broadcom Limited, Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., Avago Technologies, Ltd., and LSI
`
`Corporation (collectively “Defendants”) hereby provides their Invalidity and Unenforceability
`
`Contentions (“Invalidity Contentions”). Broadcom Ltd. and Avago Ltd. provide these
`
`disclosures subject to and without waiving their Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P 12(b)(2)
`
`and 12(b)(6) for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 47). Nothing herein shall be construed
`
`as an admission that either defendant Broadcom Ltd. or defendant Avago Ltd. is subject to
`
`personal jurisdiction in this Court, or that Plaintiff has stated a claim upon which relief can be
`
`granted.
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 229
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1037
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01249
`
`TSMC Exhibit 1039E
`TSMC v. IP Bridge
`IPR2016-01264
`
`

`

`I.
`
`GENERAL STATEMENTS AND OBJECTIONS
`
`A.
`
`Infringement Contentions and Asserted Claims
`
`Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 (“Plaintiff” or “IP Bridge”) has served Defendants
`
`with its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions1 (IP Bridge’s
`
`“Infringement Contentions”) alleging infringement of the following patents: U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,538,324 (“the ’324 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 6,197,696 (“the ’696 patent”); U.S. Patent No.
`
`RE41,980 (“the ’980 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,126,174 (“the ’174 patent”); U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,354,726 (“the ’726 patent”); and U.S. Patent No. RE43,729 (“the ’729 patent”) (collectively,
`
`the “Asserted Patents”). Based on its Infringement Contentions, IP Bridge asserts infringement
`
`of the following claims:
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`claims 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 of the ’324 patent;
`claim 13 of the ’696 patent;
`claims 18, 19, 30-36 and 47-51 of the ’980 patent;
`claims 1, 4, 5, 8-12 and 14 the ’174 patent;
`claims 1, 4, 8-10, 17-24, 26-28, 43, 46, 49, 50 and 52-62 of the ’726 patent; and
`claim 21 of the ’729 patent.
`
`(collectively, the “Asserted Claims”.)
`
`Defendants reserve the right to amend these disclosures and associated document
`
`production, should IP Bridge provide any information that it failed to provide in their
`
`Infringement Contentions, should IP Bridge amend its Infringement Contentions in any way, or
`
`should additional prior art come to light based on any clarification by IP Bridge of its
`
`Infringement Contentions. To the extent that IP Bridge’s Infringement Contentions and
`
`accompanying claim charts lack the specificity required to inform Defendants of the specifics of
`
`1 Nothing herein should be construed as a waiver of Defendants’ objections to IP Bridge’s Infringement Contentions
`for failure to comply with the Local Patent Rules.
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 229
`
`

`

`certain aspects of IP Bridge’s infringement positions, Defendants provide these Invalidity
`
`Contentions consistent with the case schedule currently in place but do so without waiving any
`
`right to receive from Plaintiffs such full and complete specific infringement disclosures as should
`
`have been provided from the outset. Defendants’ compliance with the current schedule should
`
`not be viewed as a waiver of any rights in regard to IP Bridge’s Infringement Contentions,
`
`including its claim charts. Furthermore, if IP Bridge revises its Infringement Contentions,
`
`including any of its claim charts, to address any deficiencies that have been or may be identified
`
`by Defendants, Defendants reserve the right to amend or supplement their Invalidity
`
`Contentions.
`
`B.
`
`Claim Construction
`
`The Court has not yet construed the disputed terms of the Asserted Claims in the current
`
`case. Accordingly, after such constructions are known, and for all other permissible reasons,
`
`Defendants reserve the right to identify other art or to supplement their disclosures or contentions
`
`in accordance with P. R. 3-6. Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions are based, at least in part, on
`
`their present understanding of the Asserted Claims in light of the claim constructions IP Bridge
`
`appears to be asserting based on IP Bridge’s Infringement Contentions (to the extent IP Bridge’s
`
`assertions can be understood) without regard to whether Defendants agrees with such claim
`
`constructions.
`
`Defendants take no position on any matter of claim construction in these Invalidity
`
`Contentions. If the Invalidity Contentions are consistent with or implicit in IP Bridge’s
`
`Infringement Contentions, no inference is intended or should be drawn that Defendants agree
`
`with such claim constructions. Any statement herein describing or tending to describe any claim
`
`element is provided solely for the purpose of understanding the relevant prior art. Defendants
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 229
`
`

`

`expressly reserve the right to propose any claim construction it considers appropriate and/or to
`
`contest any claim construction they consider inappropriate.
`
`In addition, because the Court has not yet construed the terms of the Asserted Claims,
`
`Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions are sometimes made in the alternative and are not necessarily
`
`intended to be consistent with each other. Further, by including in this disclosure prior art that
`
`would be anticipatory or render a claim obvious based on a particular scope or construction of
`
`the claims, including constructions applied by IP Bridge in its Infringement Contentions,
`
`Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions are not, and should in no way be seen as, adoptions or
`
`admissions as to the accuracy of such scope or construction. Consistent with the Patent Rules
`
`and/or orders of the Court, specifically Patent Rule 3-6, Defendants reserve all rights to further
`
`supplement or modify these Invalidity Contentions, including without limitation, the prior art and
`
`grounds of invalidity set forth herein, upon the discovery of additional prior art references from
`
`any source, after the Court has construed the asserted claims, and if IP Bridge is permitted at any
`
`time to amend its contentions—including its final contentions—at any reasonable time thereafter.
`
`C.
`
`Ongoing Discovery and Disclosures
`
`Discovery in this case is in its early stages, and Defendants’ investigation into the
`
`invalidity and unenforceability of the Asserted Patents, including Defendants’ search for prior
`
`art, is ongoing. Defendants reserve the right to supplement their Invalidity Contentions
`
`including, without limitation, adding additional prior art and grounds of invalidity or
`
`unenforceability. Defendants’ reservation of rights to incorporate additional prior art and
`
`invalidity claim charts includes, but is not limited to, claim charts based on materials obtained in
`
`response to subpoenas.
`
`Defendants specifically reserve the right to rely on discovery and papers and evidence
`
`filed, served, or submitted by IP Bridge in connection with this litigation. Additionally,
`4
`
`Page 4 of 229
`
`

`

`Defendants reserve the right to present additional prior art or evidence of prior art located during
`
`the course of third-party discovery or further investigation, and to amend or supplement their
`
`Invalidity Contentions to the extent that such discovery or investigation yields information
`
`forming the basis for such contentions.
`
`D.
`
`Other Defenses
`
`These Invalidity Contentions are generally limited to Defendants’ current positions
`
`regarding the grounds of invalidity specifically called for in Patent Rule 3-3 of the Eastern
`
`District of Texas. Defendants reserve the right to assert and pursue all other defenses, including
`
`those based on grounds of invalidity, that may be available, including all of the affirmative
`
`defenses pled in any of Defendants’ answers, or any other grounds.
`
`E.
`
`Additional Contentions
`
`Defendants incorporate by reference as if fully set forth herein all grounds of previously
`
`asserted against the patents. In particular, Defendants incorporate by reference all prior art
`
`references and grounds of invalidity set forth in the invalidity contentions provided in any action
`
`against the Asserted Patents, including Panasonic Corporation v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
`
`Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-1668 (E.D Tex.).
`
`II.
`
`P. R. 3-3(A) IDENTIFICATION OF PRIOR ART
`
`Each of the Asserted Claims of the Asserted Patents are anticipated and/or rendered
`
`obvious by the prior art identified below. Pursuant to P. R. 3-4(b), Defendants are producing
`
`herewith a copy or sample of the prior art identified below, to the extent copies of such prior art
`
`have not already been produced and to the extent such copies or samples are available to
`
`Defendants and can be produced at this time.
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 229
`
`

`

`A.
`
`Prior Art Patents and Patent Publications
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`6,346,745 (“Nogami”)
`5,893,752 (“Zhang”)
`6,136,682 (“Hegde”)
`0818817 (“Satitpunwaycha”)
`5,561,326 (“Ito”)
`5,652,464 (“Liao”)
`5,780,908 (“Sekiguchi”)
`5,869,902 (“Lee1”)
`5,793,112 ("Hasegawa")
`5,310,602 ("Li")
`5,900,672 ("Chan")
`6,090,702 ("Okamoto")
`5,899,740 ("Kwon")
`6,887,353 (“Ding”)
`5,882,399 (“Ngan”)
`5,895,267 (“Zhao”)
`5,391,517 (“Gelatos”)
`4,990,997 (“Nishida”)
`6,033,983 (“Lee2”)
`6,750,500 (“Agarwal”)
`5,723,382 (“Sandhu”)
`6,157,647 ("Husak")
`6,294,836 ("Paranjpe")
`6,069,073 ("Kim1")
`6,136,682 (“Hegde”)
`5,506,449 ("Nakano")
`6,103,609 ("Lee3")
`5,985,759 ("Kim2")
`6,541,371 ("Ashtiani")
`6,495,461 ("Tsubouchi")
`6,984,891 ("Ahn")
`6,881,667 ("Sandhu")
`5,882,738 ("Richard")
`
`No.
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`29
`30
`31
`32
`33
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Feb. 12, 2002
`U.S.
`Apr. 13, 1999
`U.S.
`Oct. 24, 2000
`EP
`Jan. 14, 1998
`U.S.
`Oct. 1, 1996
`U.S.
`Jul. 29, 1997
`U.S.
`Jul. 14, 1998
`U.S.
`Feb. 9, 1999
`U.S.
`Aug. 11, 1998
`U.S.
`May 10, 1994
`U.S.
`May 4, 1999
`U.S.
`Jul. 18, 2000
`U.S.
`May 4, 1999
`U.S.
`May 3, 2005
`U.S.
`Mar. 16, 1999
`U.S.
`Apr. 20, 1999
`U.S.
`Feb. 21, 1995
`U.S.
`Feb. 5, 1991
`U.S.
`Mar. 7, 2000
`U.S.
`Jun. 15, 2004
`U.S.
`Mar. 3, 1998
`U.S.
`Dec. 5, 2000
`U.S.
`Sep. 25, 2001
`U.S.
`May 30, 2000
`U.S.
`Oct. 24, 2000
`U.S.
`Apr. 9, 1996
`U.S.
`Aug. 15, 2000
`U.S.
`Nov. 16, 1999
`U.S.
`Apr. 1, 2003
`U.S.
`Dec. 17, 2002
`U.S.
`Jan. 10, 2006
`U.S.
`Apr. 19, 2005
`U.S.
`Mar. 16, 1999
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`34
`35
`36
`37
`38
`39
`40
`41
`
`No.
`42
`43
`44
`45
`46
`47
`48
`49
`50
`51
`52
`53
`54
`55
`56
`57
`58
`59
`60
`61
`62
`63
`64
`65
`66
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`6,156,647 ("Hogan2")
`6,887,353 (“Ding”)
`5,668,411 ("Hong")
`6,242,804 ("Inoue2")
`11067686
`288171
`6,139,699 ("Chiang")
`2298657 ("Cho")
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,197,696
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`5,828,096 ("Ohno")
`6,043,145 ("Suzuki")
`5,612,254 ("Chun Mu")
`5,801,443 ("Ohno1")
`6,593,230 ("Kuroda")
`5,827,778 ("Yamada")
`5,721,157 ("Sunada")
`5,739,579 ("Chiang")
`5,926,732 ("Matsuura")
`5,728,595 ("Fukase")
`6,040,242 ("Kakehashi")
`6,069,400 ("Kimura")
`5,976,972 ("Inoharra")
`6,107,191 ("Han")
`5,592,024 ("Aoyama")
`6,340,435 ("Bjorkman")
`5,635,423 ("Huang")
`5,614,765 ("Avanzino")
`6,143,646 ("Wetzel")
`6,140,226 ("Grill")
`5,882,996 ("Dai")
`5,741,626 ("Jain")
`6,140,226 ("Grill")
`5,990,015 ("Lin")
`4,789,648 ("Chow")
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Dec. 5, 2000
`U.S.
`May 3, 2005
`U.S.
`Sep. 25, 2001
`U.S.
`Jun. 5, 2001
`Japan
`Feb. 9, 2012
`Taiwan
`Oct. 11, 2011
`U.S.
`Oct. 31, 2000
`U.K.
`Nov. 9, 1996
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Oct. 27, 1998
`U.S.
`Mar. 28, 2000
`U.S.
`Mar. 18, 1997
`U.S.
`Sep. 1, 1998
`U.S.
`Jul. 15, 2003
`U.S.
`Oct. 10, 1198
`U.S.
`Feb. 24, 1998
`U.S.
`Apr. 14, 1998
`U.S.
`Jul. 20, 1999
`U.S.
`Mar. 17, 1998
`U.S.
`Mar. 21, 2000
`U.S.
`May 30, 2000
`U.S.
`Nov. 2, 1999
`U.S.
`Aug. 22, 2000
`U.S.
`Jan. 7, 1997
`U.S.
`Jan. 22, 2002
`U.S.
`Jun. 3, 1997
`U.S.
`Mar. 25, 1997
`U.S.
`Nov. 7, 2000
`U.S.
`Oct. 31, 2000
`U.S.
`Mar. 16, 1999
`U.S.
`Apr. 21, 1998
`U.S.
`Oct. 31, 2000
`U.S.
`Nov. 23, 1999
`U.S.
`Dec. 6, 1988
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`67
`68
`69
`70
`
`No.
`71
`72
`73
`74
`75
`76
`77
`78
`79
`80
`81
`82
`83
`84
`85
`86
`87
`88
`89
`90
`91
`92
`93
`94
`95
`96
`97
`98
`99
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`6,100,184 (“Zhao”)
`6,103,616 (“Yu”)
`6,127,263 (“Parikh”)
`5,173,442 (“Carey”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE41,980
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`07201985 (“Tadashi”)
`5,449,948 (“Inoue”)
`5,548,159 (“Jeng”)
`4,808,552 (“Anderson”)
`4,622,576 (“Buynoski”)
`6,188,125 (“Havemann”)
`5,886,410 (“Chiang”)
`5,834,845 (“Stolmeijer”)
`5,578,523 (“Fiordalice”)
`5,294,295 (“Gabriel”)
`5,036,383 (“Mori”)
`4,733,289 (“Tsurumaru”)
`4,978,420 (“Bach”)
`4,394,678 (“Winchell”)
`5,430,329 (“Harada”)
`6,060,378 (“Rolfson”)
`5,825,078 (“Michael”)
`5,612,254 (“Mu”)
`5,719,087 (“Chen5”)
`5,470,802 (“Gnade”)
`4,933,305 ("Kikkawa")
`5,136,364 ("Byrne")
`5,036,383 (“Mori”)
`5,248,903 ("Heim")
`5,589,523 ("Sawaoka")
`JPH06318590 (“Mitsumasa”)
`4,761,386 (“Buynoski”)
`5,055,906 (“Mase”)
`5,256,597 (“Gambino”)
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Aug. 8, 2000
`U.S.
`Aug. 15, 2000
`U.S.
`Oct. 3, 2000
`U.S.
`Dec. 22, 1992
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`Japan
`Aug. 4, 1995
`U.S.
`Sep. 12, 1995
`U.S.
`Aug. 20, 1996
`U.S.
`Feb. 28, 1989
`U.S.
`Nov. 11, 1986
`U.S.
`Feb. 13, 2001
`U.S.
`Mar. 23, 1999
`U.S.
`Nov. 10, 1998
`U.S.
`Nov. 26, 1996
`U.S.
`Mar. 15, 1994
`U.S.
`Jul. 30, 1991
`U.S.
`Mar. 22, 1988
`U.S.
`Dec. 18, 1990
`U.S.
`Jul. 19, 1983
`U.S.
`Jul. 4, 1995
`U.S.
`May 9, 2000
`U.S.
`Oct. 20, 1998
`U.S.
`Mar. 18, 1997
`U.S.
`Feb. 17, 1998
`U.S.
`Nov. 28, 1995
`U.S.
`Jun. 12, 1990
`U.S.
`Aug. 4, 1992
`U.S.
`Jul. 30, 1991
`U.S.
`Sep. 28, 1993
`U.S.
`Dec. 31, 1996
`Japan
`Nov. 15, 1994
`U.S.
`Aug. 2, 1988
`U.S.
`Oct. 8, 1991
`U.S.
`Oct. 26, 1993
`
`8
`
`Page 8 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`100
`101
`102
`103
`104
`105
`106
`107
`108
`109
`
`No.
`110
`111
`112
`113
`114
`115
`116
`117
`118
`119
`120
`121
`122
`123
`124
`125
`126
`127
`128
`129
`130
`131
`132
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`5,394,013 (“Oku”)
`5,523,626 (“Hayashi”)
`5,525,546 (“Harada”)
`5,659,201 (“Wollesen”)
`5,677,239 (“Isobe”)
`5,698,894 (“Bryant”)
`5,981,374 (“Dalal”)
`6,747,339 (“Mukai”)
`5,510,653 (“Fujiki”)
`JPH08124929 (“Hide”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,126,174
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`5,955,770 (“Chan1”)
`5,847,465 (“Liou”)
`5,539,229 (“Noble”)
`5,798,278 (“Chan2”)
`5,346,836 (“Manning”)
`5,134,085 (“Gilgen”)
`5,312,768 (“Gonzalez”)
`5,679,589 ("Lee4")
`5,021,353 ("Lowrey")
`5,349,229 ("Wei")
`4,958,213 ("Eklund")
`4,844,776 ("Lee5")
`4,957,590 ("Douglas")
`5,026,666 ("Hills")
`5,039,625 ("Reisman")
`5,153,145 ("Lee6")
`5,210,047 ("Woo")
`5,320,975 ("Cederbaum")
`5,381,302 ("Sandhu")
`5,654,213 ("Choi")
`5,683,921 ("Nishio")
`5,698,902 ("Uehara")
`5,714,413 ("Brigham")
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Feb. 28, 1995
`U.S.
`Jun. 4, 1996
`U.S.
`Jun. 11, 1996
`U.S.
`Aug. 19, 1997
`U.S.
`Oct. 14, 1997
`U.S.
`Dec. 16, 1997
`U.S.
`Nov. 9, 1999
`U.S.
`Jun. 8, 2004
`U.S.
`Apr. 23, 1996
`Japan
`May 17, 1996
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Sep. 21, 1999
`U.S.
`Dec. 8, 1998
`U.S.
`Feb. 8, 2005
`U.S.
`Aug. 25, 1998
`U.S.
`Sep. 13, 1994
`U.S.
`Jul. 28, 1992
`U.S.
`May 17, 1994
`U.S.
`Oct. 21, 1997
`U.S.
`Jun. 4, 1991
`U.S.
`Sep. 20, 1994
`U.S.
`Sep. 18, 1990
`U.S.
`Jul. 4, 1989
`U.S.
`Sep. 18, 1990
`U.S.
`Jun. 25, 1991
`U.S.
`Aug. 13, 1991
`U.S.
`Oct. 6, 1992
`U.S.
`May 11, 1993
`U.S.
`Jun. 14, 1994
`U.S.
`Jan. 10, 1995
`U.S.
`Aug. 5, 1997
`U.S.
`Nov. 4, 1997
`U.S.
`Dec. 16, 1997
`U.S.
`Feb. 3, 1998
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`133
`134
`135
`136
`137
`138
`139
`140
`141
`142
`143
`144
`145
`146
`
`No.
`147
`148
`149
`150
`151
`152
`153
`154
`155
`156
`157
`158
`159
`160
`161
`162
`163
`164
`165
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`5,726,479 ("Matsumoto")
`5,733,812 ("Ueda")
`5,830,797 ("Cleeves")
`5,976,939 ("Thompson")
`6,165,826 ("Chau")
`6,297,110 ("Chan")
`6,664,156 ("Ang")
`5,153,145 ("Lee7")
`5,069,747 ("Cathey")
`6,057,237 (“Ding”)
`5,030,585 (“Gonzalez”)
`4,506,434 (“Ogawa”)
`5,521,422 (“Mandelman”)
`5,702,976 (“Schuegraf”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,354,726
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`7,883,979 (“Chen1”)
`7,002,209 (“Chen2”)
`5,877,095 (“Tamura”)
`5,448,096 (“Kohno”)
`7,288,447 (“Chen3”)
`7,098,536 (“Yang”)
`7,193,269 (“Toda”)
`2005/0064687 (“Chidambarrao1”)
`6,974,981 (“Chidambarrao2”)
`7,678,641 (“Mori”)
`6,057,237 (“Ding”)
`2005/0116360 (“Huang2”)
`6,939,814 (“Chan”)
`7,939,413 (“Chong”)
`2003/0181005 ("Hachimine")
`7,361,539 ("Chen4")
`5,233,212 ("Ohi")
`2007/0269992 ("Yang")
`2003298046 ("Onodera")
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Mar. 10, 1998
`U.S.
`Mar. 31, 1998
`U.S.
`Nov. 3, 1998
`U.S.
`Nov. 2, 1998
`U.S.
`Dec. 26, 2000
`U.S.
`Oct. 2, 2001
`U.S.
`December 16, 2003
`U.S.
`Oct. 6, 1992
`U.S.
`Dec. 3, 1991
`U.S.
`May 2, 2000
`U.S.
`Jul. 9, 1991
`U.S.
`Mar. 26, 1985
`U.S.
`May 28, 1996
`U.S.
`Dec. 30, 1997
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Feb. 8, 2011
`U.S.
`Feb. 21, 2006
`U.S.
`Mar. 2, 1999
`U.S.
`Sep. 5, 1995
`U.S.
`Oct. 30, 2007
`U.S.
`Aug. 29, 2006
`U.S.
`Mar. 20, 2007
`U.S.
`Mar. 24, 2005
`U.S.
`Dec. 13, 2005
`U.S.
`Mar. 16, 2010
`U.S.
`May 2, 2000
`U.S.
`Jun. 2, 2005
`U.S.
`Sep. 6, 2005
`U.S.
`May 10, 2011
`U.S.
`Sep. 25, 2003
`U.S.
`Apr. 22, 2008
`U.S.
`Aug. 3, 1993
`U.S.
`Nov. 22, 2007
`Japan
`Oct. 17, 2003
`
`10
`
`Page 10 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`166
`167
`168
`169
`170
`171
`172
`173
`174
`175
`176
`177
`178
`179
`180
`181
`182
`183
`184
`185
`186
`187
`188
`
`No.
`189
`190
`191
`192
`193
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`7,423,330 ("Satoh")
`7,419,857 ("Choi")
`7,081,395 ("Chi")
`7,268,024 ("Yeo")
`7,319,258 ("Yang")
`7,354,806 ("Doris")
`7,470,973 ("Takao")
`8,106,467 ("Shima")
`7,009,226 ("Sun")
`2006/0234455 ("Chen6")
`2006/0099793 ("Yang")
`7,394,120 ("Yamasaki")
`6,504,190 ("Haematsu")
`6,635,935 ("Makino")
`2004/0099900 ("Tadashi")
`6,841,400 ("Matsumoto2")
`7,776,695 ("Arnold")
`2007/0249127 ("Mora")
`2007/0090416 ("Doyle")
`7,015,539 ("Ozawa")
`6,391,732 (“Gupta”)
`6,432,784 (“Yu1”)
`2008/0296633 (“Adams”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE43,729
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`5,963,744 ("Slavenburg ")
`5,500,812 ("Saishi")
`5,930,159 ("Wong")
`5,675,526 ("Peleg")
`5,822,232 (“Dulong”)
`
`194
`
`8,190,867 (“Peleg III”)
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Sep. 9, 2008
`U.S.
`Sep. 2, 2008
`U.S.
`Jul. 25, 2006
`U.S.
`Sep. 11, 2007
`U.S.
`Jan. 15, 2008
`U.S.
`Apr. 8, 2008
`U.S.
`Dec. 30, 2008
`U.S.
`Jan. 31, 2012
`U.S.
`Jul. 12, 2004
`U.S.
`Apr. 19, 2005
`U.S.
`May 11, 2006
`U.S.
`Jul. 1, 2008
`U.S.
`Jan. 7, 2003
`U.S.
`Oct. 21, 2003
`U.S.
`May 27, 2004
`U.S.
`Jan. 11, 2005
`U.S.
`Aug. 17, 2010
`U.S.
`Oct. 25, 2007
`U.S.
`Apr. 26, 2007
`U.S.
`Jan. 5, 2004
`U.S.
`May 21, 2002
`U.S.
`Aug. 13, 2002
`U.S.
`Dec. 4, 2008
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`U.S.
`Oct. 5, 1999
`U.S.
`Mar. 19, 1996
`U.S.
`Jul. 27, 1999
`U.S.
`Oct. 7, 1997
`U.S.
`Issued October 13, 1998
`based upon application Ser.
`No. 08/609,601, filed March
`1, 1996.
`Issued May 29, 2012 based
`upon application Ser. No.
`08/349,047, filed December 2,
`
`U.S.
`
`11
`
`Page 11 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`
`Patent No. / Publication No.
`
`195
`
`5,734,874 (“Van Hook”)
`
`196
`
`5,768,429
`
`197
`
`5,815,164
`
`198
`199
`200
`201
`202
`203
`204
`205
`206
`
`5,757,867
`5,734,879
`5,801,977
`5,915,109
`5,896,493
`3,930,232
`4,722,066
`4,519,031
`5,802,336
`
`B.
`
`Prior Art Publications
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,538,324
`
`U.S.
`
`Country of Origin Date of Issue / Publication
`1994
`Issued March 31, 1998 based
`upon application Ser. No.
`08/236,572, filed April 29,
`1994.
`Issued June 16, 1998 based
`upon application filed
`November 27, 1995
`Issued September 29, 1998
`based upon application filed
`November 27, 1995
`June 16, 1998
`March 31, 1998
`September 1, 1998
`June 22, 1999
`April 20, 1999
`December 30, 1975
`January 26, 1988
`May 21, 1985
`September 1, 1998
`
`U.S.
`
`U.S.
`
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`U.S.
`
`No.
`
`Title
`
`207
`
`208
`
`CVD and PVD
`Transition Metal
`Nitrides as
`Diffusion Barriers
`for Cu
`Metallization
`("Sun1")
`Tantalum Silicide
`Sputtering Target
`Material for
`Amorphous Ta-Si-
`N Diffusion
`Barrier for Cu
`Metallization
`("Ivanov")
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Date of
`Publication
`Oct. 21-23,
`1998
`
`S.C. Sun.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003534
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003531
`
`IEEE – Proceedings
`of the 1998 5th
`International
`Conference on Solid-
`State and Integrated
`Circuit Technology
`
`IEEE - Proceedings
`of the IEEE 1998
`International
`Interconnect
`Technology
`Conference
`
`Jun. 1-3,
`1998
`
`E. Ivanov
`
`12
`
`Page 12 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`
`Title
`
`209
`
`210
`
`211
`
`Sputtering of
`Tantalum-Based
`Diffusion Barriers
`in Si/Cu
`Metallization:
`Effects of Gas
`Pressure and
`Composition
`("Stavrev")
`Tantalum as a
`diffusion barrier
`between copper
`and silicon: Failure
`mechanism and
`effect of nitrogen
`additions
`(“Holloway”)
`Properties of
`reactively sputter-
`deposited Ta-N
`thin films (“Sun2”)
`
`Author(s)
`
`Date of
`Publication
`Oct. 2, 1995 M. Stavrev et
`al.
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Applied Surface
`Science
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_002120
`
`1992
`
`K. Holloway
`et al.
`
`Journal of Applied
`Physics
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001766
`
`1993
`
`X. Sun et al.
`
`Thin Solid Films
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001778
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,197,696
`
`Date of
`Publication
`1997
`
`1997
`
`No.
`
`Title
`
`212
`
`213
`
`“Damascene
`copper
`interconnects with
`polymer ILDs”
`("Price")
`“Ultra-Low
`Resistance Direct
`Contact Cu Via
`Technology Using
`In-situ Chemical
`Vapor Cleaning,”
`("Tsuchiya")
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`David T.
`Price, Ronald
`J. Gutmann,
`Shyam P.
`Murarka,
`Y.Tsuchiya et
`al.
`
`Elsevier Science,
`Thin Solid Films
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_000471
`
`Symposium on VLSI
`Technology Digest of
`Technical Papers
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_000487
`
`13
`
`Page 13 of 229
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 7,126,174
`
`Date of
`Publication
`1991
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`W.S.
`Lindengerger
`et al.
`
`IEEE 1991 VLSI
`Tech. Symp. Digest
`of Technical Papers
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001337
`
`Jul. 1995
`
`R.W. Mann et
`al.
`
`IBM Journal of
`Research
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001322
`
`No.
`
`Title
`
`214
`
`215
`
`Submicron
`Mechanically
`Planarized
`Shallow Trench
`Isolation With
`Field Shield
`("Lindenberger")
`Silicides and
`Local
`Interconnections
`for High-
`Performance VLSI
`Applications
`("Mann")
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,354,726
`
`No. Title
`
`216
`
`217
`
`218
`
`219
`
`220
`
`Stress Modeling of
`Nanoscale
`MOSFET ("Shah")
`
`IntelR Core™ Duo
`T2300 ‘Yonah’
`Microprocessor
`Structural Analysis
`--- Chipworks Rev.
`1.0 February 21,
`2006 SAR-0602-
`802
`State of the Art in
`Transistors
`("Bohr")
`Strain Modeling in
`Advanced
`MOSFET Devices
`("Cea")
`Strain for CMOS
`Performance
`Improvement
`("Chan")
`
`Date of
`Publication
`2005
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Shah
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003668
`
`Feb. 21,
`2006
`
`Chipworks
`
`Chipworks
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001242
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`Bohr
`
`Cea
`
`2005
`
`Chan
`
`14
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_000574
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_000576
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_000586
`
`Page 14 of 229
`
`

`

`No. Title
`
`222
`
`223
`
`221 Mechanical and
`Electrical Analysis
`of Strained Liner
`Effect in 35 nm
`Fully Depleted
`Silicon-on-
`Insulator Devices
`with Ultra Thin
`Silicon Channels
`("Gallon")
`Strained Si, SiGe,
`and Ge Channels
`for High-Mobility
`Metal-Oxide-
`Semiconductor
`Field-Effect
`Transistors
`("Lee8")
`Comparision of
`Threshold-Voltage
`Shifts for Uniaxial
`and Biaxial
`Tensile-Stressed n-
`MOSFETs ("Lim")
`224 Mobility-
`Enhancement
`Technologies
`("Wee")
`Strained Ultrahigh
`Performance Fully
`Depleted
`nMOSFETs With
`ft of 330 GHz and
`Sub-30-nm Gate
`Lengths ("Singh")
`226 Dual Stress Liner
`for High
`Performance sub-
`45nm Gate Length
`SOI CMOS
`Manufacturing
`("Yang")
`Toward a
`Methodology for
`Manufacturability-
`Driven Design
`
`225
`
`227
`
`Date of
`Publication
`2006
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Gallon
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003648
`
`2005
`
`Lee
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_000594
`
`2004
`
`Lim
`
`2005
`
`Wee
`
`2006
`
`Singh
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003655
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003658
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003755
`
`2004
`
`Yang
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_003806
`
`2004
`
`L. Capodieci,
`et al.
`
`Proceedings - Design
`Automation
`Conference
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001826
`
`15
`
`Page 15 of 229
`
`

`

`No. Title
`
`Date of
`Publication
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`228
`
`Rule Exploration
`(“Capodieci”)
`
`Intel
`BX80546PG2800E
`Pentium® 4
`Prescott
`Microprocessor
`Structural Analysis
`
`Apr. 12,
`2004
`
`Chipworks
`
`Chipworks
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001832
`
`U.S. Patent No. RE43,729
`
`No. Title
`
`230
`
`229 Accelerating
`Multimedia with
`Enhanced
`Microprocessors
`("Lee9")
`Intel's MMX
`Speeds
`Multimedia
`("Gwennap")
`231 UltraSPARC I: A
`Four-Issue
`Processor
`Supporting
`Multimedia, ,
`(“Tremblay I”)
`232 VIS Speeds New
`Media Processing,
`(“Tremblay II”)
`
`233 UltraSPARC-I
`Data Sheet High-
`Performance 64-
`Bit RISC
`Processor,
`(“UltraSPARC
`Data Sheet”)
`234 UltraSPARC-I
`Data Sheet High-
`Performance 167
`& 200 MHz 64-bit
`
`Date of
`Publication
`Apr. 1995
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Ruby Lee
`
`IEEE Micro, April
`1995, pp. 22-32
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005010
`
`Mar. 5, 1996
`
`Gwennap
`
`April 1996
`
`August 1996
`
`May 1995
`
`October 1996
`
`Marc
`Tremblay
`and J.
`Michael
`O’Connor
`
`Marc
`Tremblay,
`et. al.,
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`16
`
`Microprocessor
`Report, Volume 10,
`Number 3, March 5,
`1996
`IEEE Micro Volume
`16, Issue 2, pp. 42-
`50, April 1996,
`published by IEEE
`
`IEEE Micro Volume
`16, Issue 4, pp. 10-
`20, August 1996,
`published by IEEE
`SPARC Technology
`Business, a division
`of Sun Microsystems,
`Inc., 2550 Garcia
`Avenue, Mountain
`View CA 94043
`
`SPARC Technology
`Business, a division
`of Sun Microsystems,
`Inc., 2550 Garcia
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001352
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_012001
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010568
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_011925
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_011961
`
`Page 16 of 229
`
`

`

`No. Title
`
`Date of
`Publication
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`237
`
`RISC Processor,
`STP1030A,
`(“UltraSPARC
`Data Sheet II”)
`235 UltraSPARC and
`New-Media
`Support Real-time
`MPEG2 Decode
`with the Visual
`Instruction Set
`(VIS), Sun
`Whitepaper 95-
`028,
`236 UltraSPARC The
`Visual Instruction
`Set (VIS) On Chip
`Support for New-
`Media Processing,
`Sun Whitepaper
`95-022,
`SPARC Assembly
`Language
`Reference
`Manual, possibly
`part no. 802-1947,
`(“SPARC
`Assembly
`Manual”)
`238 UltraSPARCIIi
`User’s Manual,
`(“UltraSPARC IIi
`Manual”)
`The UltraSPARC
`User’s Manual
`published by Sun
`Microsystems,
`Part No. 802-
`7220-02 (“UUM”)
`240 UltraSPARC-II
`Application Note,
`Part Number 802-
`7254-01,
`SPARCEngine
`Ultra AX, Sun
`Microelectronics,
`
`239
`
`241
`
`Avenue, Mountain
`View CA 94043
`
`no later than
`June 26, 1996
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun Microsystems
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_012146
`
`no later than
`June 6, 1996
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun Microsystems
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_012138
`
`1995
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun Microsystems
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010847
`
`October 1997
`
`July 1997
`
`July 1996
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun
`Microelectro
`nics
`
`Sun
`Microelectro
`nic
`
`17
`
`Sun Microsystems,
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010965
`
`Sun Microsystems
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_011517
`
`Sun Microelectronics DEFS_PRIORART
`_010697
`
`Sun Microelectronics DEFS_PRIORART
`_010845
`
`Page 17 of 229
`
`

`

`No. Title
`
`242
`
`243
`
`244
`
`PBN-0006-01.
`
`Printouts from
`Sun Microsystem
`website acquired
`via Internet
`Archive
`(www.archive.org
`)
`Printouts from
`Intel Corp.
`website acquired
`via Internet
`Archive
`(www.archive.org
`)
`Intel MMX
`Technology
`Developers Guide,
`
`245
`
`Intel Architecture
`MMX™
`Technology
`Programmer’s
`Reference
`Manual, Order
`No. 243007-002
`246 MMX Technology
`Extension To The
`Intel Architecture,
`(“Peleg” or “Peleg
`I”)
`
`247
`
`Intel Pentium
`Processor Family
`Developer’s
`Manual, Order
`Number 241428,
`(“Family
`
`Date of
`Publication
`
`1995-1997
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Sun
`Microsyste
`ms
`
`Sun Microsystems
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_012121 - 12138
`
`1995-1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`March 1996
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`March 1996,
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`August 1996
`
`Peleg et al.,
`
`1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`IEEE Micro, Volume
`16, Issue 4, August
`1996, Page 42-50,
`published by IEEE
`Computer Society
`Press, Los Alamitos,
`CA, USA
`Intel Corp.
`
`18
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010163 – 10276,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005362,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009588 - 9817
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010435,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010484,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005376 – 05425,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005516
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005276 – 05361,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009588,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005565
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010533,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005708,
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_007163
`
`Page 18 of 229
`
`

`

`No. Title
`
`Manual”)
`
`Date of
`Publication
`
`248
`
`Intel MMX for
`Multimedia PCs,
`
`January 1997
`
`249
`
`1997
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Peleg, et. al., COMMUNICATION
`S OF THE ACM
`January 1997/Vol.
`40, No.1, pp. 25-38,
`(“Peleg II”)
`Published by
`ACM/IEEE.
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_008779
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_007772
`
`Intel Architecture
`Optimization
`Manual, Order
`Number 242816-
`003,
`(“Optimization
`Manual”)
`250 MMX™
`Microarchitecture
`of Pentium®
`Processors With
`MMX Technology
`and Pentium® II
`Microprocessors,
`Intel Technology
`Journal Q3 ’97
`(1997) (“Kagan”)
`Intel Architecture
`Software
`Developer’s
`Manual Volume 1:
`Basic
`Architecture,
`Order Number
`243190, (“Basic
`Architecture
`Manual”)
`Intel Architecture
`Software
`Developer’s
`Manual Volume 2:
`Instruction Set
`Reference
`Manual, Order
`Number 243191,
`(“ISR Manual”)
`
`251
`
`252
`
`Q3 ’97 (1997) Kagan, et.
`al.,
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_008771
`
`1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_007922
`
`1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_008205
`
`19
`
`Page 19 of 229
`
`

`

`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Date of
`Publication
`June 1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`January 1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`June 1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`January 1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_008822
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009562
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009531
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009588
`
`January 8,
`1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009800
`
`No. Title
`
`253
`
`254
`
`255
`
`256
`
`257
`
`258
`
`Intel PENTIUM®
`PROCESSOR
`WITH MMX™
`TECHNOLOGY
`datasheet
`Intel Pentium
`Processor with
`MMX Technology
`Performance
`Brief, Order
`Number 24328601
`Intel Pentium
`Processor with
`MMX Technology
`Performance
`Brief, Order
`Number 24328604
`Intel Pentium®
`Processor
`Specification
`Update, Release
`Date: January,
`1997, Order
`Number 242480-
`024
`Intel Introduces
`The Pentium®
`Processor With
`MMX™
`Technology, Press
`Release,
`Intel Unveils
`P55C
`Architecture,
`November 1, 1996
`
`November 1,
`1996
`
`HPC wire.
`
`259 New chip begs
`new questions,
`
`October 22,
`1996
`
`CNET
`
`260 Computer
`Organization &
`Design The
`Hardware
`
`1994
`
`Patterson et
`al.,
`
`20
`
`HPCwire.
`(http://www.hpcwire.
`com/1996/11/01/
`intelunveilsp55carchi
`tecture/)
`CNET.
`http://www.cnet.com/
`news/
`newchipbegsnewques
`tions/.
`Morgan Kaufman
`Publishers, Inc.
`(1994)
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009806
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_009813
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006658,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006654,
`
`Page 20 of 229
`
`

`

`No. Title
`
`Date of
`Publication
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`Bates No.
`
`Software
`Interface,
`(“Patterson”)
`
`261
`
`262
`
`IEEE Std 100-
`1996, The IEEE
`Standard
`Dictionary of
`Electrical and
`Electronics Terms,
`Printout from
`IEEE database
`identifying
`citations to
`Patterson
`263 March 5, 1996
`Intel MMX Press
`Release.
`
`(approved
`December 10,
`1996)
`
`IEEE
`
`1995-1997
`
`IEEE
`
`Published by the
`Institute of Electrical
`and Electronics
`Engineers, Inc.
`(approved December
`10, 1996)
`IEEE
`
`March 5, 1996
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`264
`
`Internet Archive
`declaration (with
`attached pages
`from archive.org)
`
`4/15/2016 with
`attachments
`from 1995-
`1997
`
`Chris Butler
`
`Internet Archive
`(www.archive.org)
`
`265
`
`IPR Petition 2016-
`00826
`
`04/19/2016
`
`PTAB
`
`PTAB
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006572,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005717
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006580,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006246
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006572,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006456
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_010263,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006249
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005076 – 5275,
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_006263 – 6571
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_005428 -
`
`As to All Asserted Patents
`
`No.
`
`Title
`
`266 VLSI Fabrication Principles
`("Ghandhi")
`Physics of Semiconductor
`Devices ("Sze")
`
`267
`
`Date of
`Publication
`1983
`
`1981
`
`Author(s)
`
`Publisher
`
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001709
`DEFS_PRIORART
`_001371
`
`C.
`
`Prior Art Offers for Sale and Public Uses Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
`
`No.
`P1
`
`P2
`
`Title
`IntelR Core™ Duo T2300
`Microprocessor (“Yonah”)
`Intel Pentium® 4 2.8E 90nm February or March, 2004
`
`Date of First Offer/Use
`January, 2006
`
`Identity of Seller/User
`Intel Corp.
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`21
`
`Page 21 of 229
`
`

`

`No.
`
`P3
`
`P4
`
`P5
`
`P6
`
`P7
`P8
`
`Title
`Microprocessor (“Prescott”)
`Intel Pentium II CPU 9706
`("Klamath")
`IBM Motorola MPC750
`("Arthur")
`Intel Pentium with MMX
`Technology
`Intel Pentium II with MMX
`Technology
`UltraSPARC-I
`UltraSPARC-II
`
`Date of First Offer/Use
`
`Identity of Seller/User
`
`Jan. 7, 1997
`
`Sep. 7, 1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`IBM/Motorola
`
`Late 1995, early 1996
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`Early 1997
`
`Intel Corp.
`
`October 2, 1995
`October 11, 1995
`
`Sun Microsystems
`Sun Microsystems
`
`Defendants’ invalidity contentions for the invalidating systems are based upon documents
`
`and other manuals authored or invented by the identified seller/user or its employees (e.g., Intel
`
`Corp. and Sun Microsystems). Due to the long gap between the filing date of many of the
`
`applications for the Asserted Patents—including the 19 year gap between the 1997 filing date of
`
`the application of RE43,729 and the filing of the present lawsuit (which is directly attributable to
`
`Plaintiff’s inexcusable delay for filing the present lawsuit which has prejudiced Defendants’
`
`ability to defend themselves in this action)—additional materials related to these products are
`
`likely to be in the possession of third parties such as the identified seller/users. For example, the
`
`manua